tracend · June 3, 2016 02:14 · Jun 3, 2016 · Jun 3, 2016 · Jun 2, 2016 · Jun 2, 2016
diff --git a/makesites-insider-201606.md b/makesites-insider-201606.md
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ This defeatist mentality can be overthrown with some good ol' ambition. **The po
 
 At first glance it seems plausible. Once an idea is out there anyone can copy it... In reality though, no one cares about ideas because there's no way of guaranteeing their success. People unanimously are interested in proven solutions. Even law has little regard for intangible concepts. You can only patent an application of an idea, not the idea itself. 
 
-We live in a world of "doing" because that is fundamentally what affects our surroundings. **Ideas can be strong and if you are right you may be successful, but without an application any idea will amount to nothing**. On the same vibe, never care for what others know or what mind games they play. When getting into this field, affecting people is the primary goal. 
+We live in a world of "doing" because that is fundamentally what affects our surroundings. **Ideas can be strong and if you are right you may be successful, but without an application any idea will amount to nothing**. On the same vibe, never care for what others know or what mind games they play. When getting into this field, positively affecting people's lives is the primary goal.
 
 
 ## Big boys know best 
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ Creating open source can become serious business though, like any other enterpri
 
 ## You are not welcomed
 
-Whenever personal gain is prioritized above mutual benefit any collective will turn into an exclusive club. Phenomena like the "[bro culture](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bro_(subculture))" and "[meritocracy](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meritocracy)" are interpretations of that tendency. **The fact that sharing minimizes inherent risk is the at heart of Open Source**. That's why open source needs to be all inclusive and provide a sane narrative that everyone can follow. 
+Whenever personal gain is prioritized above mutual benefit any collective will turn into an exclusive club. Phenomena like the "[bro culture](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bro_(subculture))" and "[meritocracy](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meritocracy)" are manifestations of that tendency. **The fact that sharing minimizes inherent risk is the at heart of Open Source**. That's why open source needs to be all inclusive and provide a sane narrative that everyone can follow. 
 
 Fostering mistrust, promoting authoritative voices and treating developers as followers rather than makers are all red flags for an open source community. Being welcomed is not an issue because no one should be handing out invites. This controlling atmosphere stifles personal creativity and communal productivity; it breeds competitiveness instead of promoting the collaborative spirit. 
 

diff --git a/makesites-insider-201606.md b/makesites-insider-201606.md
@@ -4,37 +4,35 @@ As software is [dominating our modern society](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mar
 
 ---
 
-Before releasing anything as open source, before even writing the first line of code, there are questions haunting any developer's subconscious; even external factors from third-parties and their reactions that can pressure or worse deter anyone from contributing any open source. 
+Before releasing anything as open source, before even writing the first line of code, there are questions haunting any developer's subconscious; more so external factors from third-parties and their reactions that can pressure or worse deter them from contributing any open source. 
 
 
 ## It's not for you 
 
-This is an obvious first: Doubt. Everyone measures reality based on themselves and if someone thinks they can't do something it's comforting to assume that no one else can either. Our society, our bureaucracy even our education system is based on this false assumption of "equality". Many stop themselves from contributing to open source because they have convinced themselves they can't contribute. 
+This is an obvious first: Doubt. Everyone measures reality based on themselves and if someone thinks they can't do something it's comforting to assume that no one else can either. Our society, our bureaucracy even our education system is based on this false assumption of "equality". Many quit from contributing to open source because they have convinced themselves they can't contribute. 
 
-This defeatist mentality can be overthrown with some good'ol ambition. The potential of matching others success is enough reason for some to participate in the open source scene. Even if vanity plays a big role for a good share of developers, it's hardly the best driving force. That's because the creation will always be tempered by the ulterior motive of personal gain. The software will never be unlimited, untethered from personal goals and completely unrestricted. Aiming for a drive that's more altruistic [has been proven](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_distribution) to produce better results. 
+This defeatist mentality can be overthrown with some good ol' ambition. **The potential of matching other's success can be enough reason to participate in the open source scene**. Even if vanity plays a big role for a good share of developers, it's hardly the best drive. That's because the creation will always be tempered by the ulterior motive of personal gain. The software will never be unlimited, untethered from personal goals and completely unrestricted. Aiming for a drive that's more altruistic [has been proven](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_distribution) to produce better results. 
 
 
 ## Your ideas will be stolen
 
-At first glance it seems plausible. Once an idea is out there anyone can copy it. The reality is that no one cares about ideas because there's no way of guaranteeing their success. People unanimously are interested in proven solutions. 
+At first glance it seems plausible. Once an idea is out there anyone can copy it... In reality though, no one cares about ideas because there's no way of guaranteeing their success. People unanimously are interested in proven solutions. Even law has little regard for intangible concepts. You can only patent an application of an idea, not the idea itself. 
 
-Even law has little regard for intangible concepts. You can only patent an application of an idea, not the idea itself. We live in a world of "doing" because that is fundamentally what affects our surroundings. 
-
-Ideas can be strong and if you are right you may be successful, but without an application any idea will amount to nothing. On the same vibe, never care for what others know or what mind games they play. When getting into this field, affecting people is the primary goal. 
+We live in a world of "doing" because that is fundamentally what affects our surroundings. **Ideas can be strong and if you are right you may be successful, but without an application any idea will amount to nothing**. On the same vibe, never care for what others know or what mind games they play. When getting into this field, affecting people is the primary goal. 
 
 
 ## Big boys know best 
 
-Following the previous mindset, it's anyone's best guess how valuable some open source software is when there is no frame of reference, so corporation-backed open source is often believed to be better supported and with better chances of producing quality solutions. This "power in numbers" mentality is as juvenile as it is shortsighted. In the brief history of computer software it's been proven numerous times that individuals with a vision are the major catalysts of change, not corporations with millions in the bank. 
+Following the previous mindset, it's anyone's best guess how valuable some open source software is when there is no frame of reference, so corporation-backed open source is often believed to be better supported and with better chances of producing quality solutions. **This "power in numbers" mentality is as juvenile as it is shortsighted**. In the brief history of computer software it's been proven numerous times that individuals with a vision are the major catalysts of change, not corporations with millions in the bank. 
 
-Like any enterprise though, creating open source can be serious business. Another popular opinion says that once successful you should expect the competition to be after you, and those with the deepest pockets will have the greatest means to obfuscate, undermine, appropriate and in general become obstacles in your way. There's no better advice than to simply seek trust within you. Every day there's going to be something new: some new challenge, some new evolution that changes the game for everyone. Open your mind to retain a unique, different view that will help you always be one step ahead. 
+Creating open source can become serious business though, like any other enterprise. Another popular opinion says that once successful you should expect the competition to be after you, and those with the deepest pockets will have the greatest means to obfuscate, undermine, appropriate and in general become obstacles in your way. **There's no better advice than to simply seek trust within you**. Every day there's going to be something new: some new challenge, some new evolution that changes the game for everyone. Open your mind to retain a unique, different view that will help you always be one step ahead. 
 
 
 ## You are not welcomed
 
-Whenever personal gain is prioritized above mutual benefit any collective will turn into an exclusive club. Phenomena like the "[bro culture](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bro_(subculture))" and "[meritocracy](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meritocracy)" are interpretations of that mindset. **The fact that sharing minimizes inherent risk is the at heart of Open Source**. That's why Open Source needs to be all inclusive and provide a sane narrative that everyone can follow. 
+Whenever personal gain is prioritized above mutual benefit any collective will turn into an exclusive club. Phenomena like the "[bro culture](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bro_(subculture))" and "[meritocracy](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meritocracy)" are interpretations of that tendency. **The fact that sharing minimizes inherent risk is the at heart of Open Source**. That's why open source needs to be all inclusive and provide a sane narrative that everyone can follow. 
 
-Fostering mistrust, promoting authoritative voices and treating developers as followers rather than makers are all red flags for an Open Source community. Being welcomed is not an issue because no one should be handing out invites. This controlling atmosphere stifles personal creativity and communal productivity; it breeds competitiveness instead of promoting the collaborative spirit. 
+Fostering mistrust, promoting authoritative voices and treating developers as followers rather than makers are all red flags for an open source community. Being welcomed is not an issue because no one should be handing out invites. This controlling atmosphere stifles personal creativity and communal productivity; it breeds competitiveness instead of promoting the collaborative spirit. 
 
 
 ## Been there, done that
@@ -47,4 +45,4 @@ If you're creating open source to compete with other developers, for the glory o
 
 ---
 
-Fast-forward to the end and we all like to recycle the many success stories, the "silent" moderate stories and the few [sad stories](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aaron_Swartz) that open source has given us. Any newcomer in this field will have to decide to either go under the wing of someone established, a mentor or corporation and feed from their worth, or make a personal stand. As the first may not be an option for the majority, this leaves them with either an early defeat or a challenge to “prove” themselves... So, "prove" yourself. Do it for you, not the reward.
+Fast-forward to the end and we all like to recycle the many success stories, the "silent" moderate stories and the few [sad stories](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aaron_Swartz) that open source has given us. Any newcomer in this field will have to decide to either go under the wing of someone established, a mentor or corporation and feed from their worth, or make a personal stand. As the first may not be an option for the majority, this leaves them with either an early defeat or a challenge to "prove" themselves... So, "prove" yourself. Do it for you, not the reward.
diff --git a/makesites-insider-201606.md b/makesites-insider-201606.md
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ Like any enterprise though, creating open source can be serious business. Anothe
 
 Whenever personal gain is prioritized above mutual benefit any collective will turn into an exclusive club. Phenomena like the "[bro culture](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bro_(subculture))" and "[meritocracy](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meritocracy)" are interpretations of that mindset. **The fact that sharing minimizes inherent risk is the at heart of Open Source**. That's why Open Source needs to be all inclusive and provide a sane narrative that everyone can follow. 
 
-Fostering mistrust, promoting authoritative voices and treating developers as followers rather than makers are all red flags for an Open Source community. Being welcomed is not an issue because no one should be handing invites. This controlling atmosphere stifles personal creativity and communal productivity; it breeds competitiveness instead of promoting the collaborative spirit. 
+Fostering mistrust, promoting authoritative voices and treating developers as followers rather than makers are all red flags for an Open Source community. Being welcomed is not an issue because no one should be handing out invites. This controlling atmosphere stifles personal creativity and communal productivity; it breeds competitiveness instead of promoting the collaborative spirit. 
 
 
 ## Been there, done that

diff --git a/makesites-insider-201606.md b/makesites-insider-201606.md
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ Like any enterprise though, creating open source can be serious business. Anothe
 
 ## You are not welcomed
 
-Whenever personal gain is prioritized above mutual benefit any collective will turn into an exclusive club. Phenomena like the "[bro culture](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bro_(subculture)" and "[meritocracy](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meritocracy)" are interpretations of that mindset. **The fact that sharing minimizes inherent risk is the at heart of Open Source**. That's why Open Source needs to be all inclusive and provide a sane narrative that everyone can follow. 
+Whenever personal gain is prioritized above mutual benefit any collective will turn into an exclusive club. Phenomena like the "[bro culture](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bro_(subculture))" and "[meritocracy](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meritocracy)" are interpretations of that mindset. **The fact that sharing minimizes inherent risk is the at heart of Open Source**. That's why Open Source needs to be all inclusive and provide a sane narrative that everyone can follow. 
 
 Fostering mistrust, promoting authoritative voices and treating developers as followers rather than makers are all red flags for an Open Source community. Being welcomed is not an issue because no one should be handing invites. This controlling atmosphere stifles personal creativity and communal productivity; it breeds competitiveness instead of promoting the collaborative spirit. 
 

diff --git a/makesites-insider-201606.md b/makesites-insider-201606.md
@@ -29,9 +29,10 @@ Following the previous mindset, it's anyone's best guess how valuable some open
 
 Like any enterprise though, creating open source can be serious business. Another popular opinion says that once successful you should expect the competition to be after you, and those with the deepest pockets will have the greatest means to obfuscate, undermine, appropriate and in general become obstacles in your way. There's no better advice than to simply seek trust within you. Every day there's going to be something new: some new challenge, some new evolution that changes the game for everyone. Open your mind to retain a unique, different view that will help you always be one step ahead. 
 
+
 ## You are not welcomed
 
-Whenever personal gain is prioritized above mutual benefit any collective will turn into an exclusive club. Phenomena like the "[bro culture](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bro_(subculture)" and "[meritocracy](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meritocracy)" are interpretations of that mindeset. **The fact that sharing minimizes inherent risk is the at heart of Open Source**. That's why Open Source needs to be all inclusive and provide a sane narrative that everyone can follow. 
+Whenever personal gain is prioritized above mutual benefit any collective will turn into an exclusive club. Phenomena like the "[bro culture](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bro_(subculture)" and "[meritocracy](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meritocracy)" are interpretations of that mindset. **The fact that sharing minimizes inherent risk is the at heart of Open Source**. That's why Open Source needs to be all inclusive and provide a sane narrative that everyone can follow. 
 
 Fostering mistrust, promoting authoritative voices and treating developers as followers rather than makers are all red flags for an Open Source community. Being welcomed is not an issue because no one should be handing invites. This controlling atmosphere stifles personal creativity and communal productivity; it breeds competitiveness instead of promoting the collaborative spirit. 
 

diff --git a/makesites-insider-201606.md b/makesites-insider-201606.md
@@ -29,6 +29,12 @@ Following the previous mindset, it's anyone's best guess how valuable some open
 
 Like any enterprise though, creating open source can be serious business. Another popular opinion says that once successful you should expect the competition to be after you, and those with the deepest pockets will have the greatest means to obfuscate, undermine, appropriate and in general become obstacles in your way. There's no better advice than to simply seek trust within you. Every day there's going to be something new: some new challenge, some new evolution that changes the game for everyone. Open your mind to retain a unique, different view that will help you always be one step ahead. 
 
+## You are not welcomed
+
+Whenever personal gain is prioritized above mutual benefit any collective will turn into an exclusive club. Phenomena like the "[bro culture](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bro_(subculture)" and "[meritocracy](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meritocracy)" are interpretations of that mindeset. **The fact that sharing minimizes inherent risk is the at heart of Open Source**. That's why Open Source needs to be all inclusive and provide a sane narrative that everyone can follow. 
+
+Fostering mistrust, promoting authoritative voices and treating developers as followers rather than makers are all red flags for an Open Source community. Being welcomed is not an issue because no one should be handing invites. This controlling atmosphere stifles personal creativity and communal productivity; it breeds competitiveness instead of promoting the collaborative spirit. 
+
 
 ## Been there, done that
 

diff --git a/makesites-insider-201606.md b/makesites-insider-201606.md
@@ -9,35 +9,35 @@ Before releasing anything as open source, before even writing the first line of
 
 ## It's not for you 
 
-This is an obvious first. Doubt. Everyone measures reality based on themselves and if someone thinks they can't do something it's comforting to assume that no one else can either. Our society, our bureaucracy even our education system is based on this false assumption of "equality". Many stop themselves from contributing to open source because they have convinced themselves that they can't contribute. 
+This is an obvious first: Doubt. Everyone measures reality based on themselves and if someone thinks they can't do something it's comforting to assume that no one else can either. Our society, our bureaucracy even our education system is based on this false assumption of "equality". Many stop themselves from contributing to open source because they have convinced themselves they can't contribute. 
 
 This defeatist mentality can be overthrown with some good'ol ambition. The potential of matching others success is enough reason for some to participate in the open source scene. Even if vanity plays a big role for a good share of developers, it's hardly the best driving force. That's because the creation will always be tempered by the ulterior motive of personal gain. The software will never be unlimited, untethered from personal goals and completely unrestricted. Aiming for a drive that's more altruistic [has been proven](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_distribution) to produce better results. 
 
 
 ## Your ideas will be stolen
 
-At first glance it seems obvious. Once an idea is out there anyone can copy it. The reality is that no one cares about ideas because there's no way of guaranteeing their success. People unanimously are interested in proven solutions. 
+At first glance it seems plausible. Once an idea is out there anyone can copy it. The reality is that no one cares about ideas because there's no way of guaranteeing their success. People unanimously are interested in proven solutions. 
 
 Even law has little regard for intangible concepts. You can only patent an application of an idea, not the idea itself. We live in a world of "doing" because that is fundamentally what affects our surroundings. 
 
-Ideas can be strong and if you are right you may be successful, but without an application any idea will amount to nothing. On the same vibe, never care for what others know or what mind games they play. When getting into this field, affecting people is our primary goal. 
+Ideas can be strong and if you are right you may be successful, but without an application any idea will amount to nothing. On the same vibe, never care for what others know or what mind games they play. When getting into this field, affecting people is the primary goal. 
 
 
 ## Big boys know best 
 
-Following the previous mindset, it's anyone's best guess how valuable some open source software is when there is no frame of reference and so corporation-backed open source is often believed to be better supported and with better chances of producing quality solutions. This "power in numbers" mentality is as juvenile as it is shortsighted. In the brief history of computer software it's been proven numerous times that individuals with a vision are the major catalysts of change, not corporations with millions in the bank. 
+Following the previous mindset, it's anyone's best guess how valuable some open source software is when there is no frame of reference, so corporation-backed open source is often believed to be better supported and with better chances of producing quality solutions. This "power in numbers" mentality is as juvenile as it is shortsighted. In the brief history of computer software it's been proven numerous times that individuals with a vision are the major catalysts of change, not corporations with millions in the bank. 
 
-Like any enterprise though, creating open source can be serious business. Another popular opinion says that once successful you should expect the competition to be after you, and those with the deepest pockets will have the greatest means to become obstacles in your way. There's no better advice than to simply seek trust within you. Every day there's going to be something new: some new challenge, some new evolution that changes the game for everyone. Open your mind to retain a unique, different view that will help you always be one step ahead. 
+Like any enterprise though, creating open source can be serious business. Another popular opinion says that once successful you should expect the competition to be after you, and those with the deepest pockets will have the greatest means to obfuscate, undermine, appropriate and in general become obstacles in your way. There's no better advice than to simply seek trust within you. Every day there's going to be something new: some new challenge, some new evolution that changes the game for everyone. Open your mind to retain a unique, different view that will help you always be one step ahead. 
 
 
 ## Been there, done that
 
-Once confronted with the fact that there are no new battles, that there have already been generations of developers that have fought and retired, the immediate thought is to wonder what's the point of doing anything, especially repeating something that's been done before.
+Once confronted with the fact that there are no new wars, just different battles; that there have already been generations of developers that have fought and retired; the immediate thought is to wonder what's the point of doing anything, especially repeating something that's been done before.
 
-The answer is simple. Even if software is abundant, the connection you have with your code is unique. Some devs are so close to their code, they can't be disconnected from it no matter how long they are apart. All that matters is that connection to a creation. 
+There's a simple answer to this puzzle. Even if software is abundant, the connection you have with your code is unique. Some devs are so close to their code, they can't be disconnected from it no matter how long they are apart. All that matters is that connection to a creation. 
 
-If you're creating open source to compete with other developers, for the glory or for the reward you will most likely end up bitter and betrayed. **Creating open source is not and should not be a popularity contest**. It's a lifestyle choice and a creation marathon. Those who endure, those who persist are the ones left on top. This requires a selfless devotion like a parent to their children or a monk to their faith.
+If you're creating open source to compete with other developers, for the glory or for the reward you will most likely end up bitter and betrayed. **Creating open source is not a novelty and should not be a popularity contest**. It's a lifestyle choice and a creation marathon. Those who endure, those who persist, are the ones left on top. This requires a selfless devotion like a parent to their children or a monk to their faith.
 
 ---
 
-Fast-forward to the end and we all like to recycle the many success stories, the "silent" moderate stories and the few [sad stories](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aaron_Swartz) that open source has given us. Any newcomer in this field will have to decide to either go under the wing of someone established, a mentor or corporation and feed from their worth, or make a personal stand. As the first may not be an option for the majority, this leaves them with either an early defeat or a challenge to “prove” themselves. So, "prove" yourself. Do it for you, not the reward.
+Fast-forward to the end and we all like to recycle the many success stories, the "silent" moderate stories and the few [sad stories](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aaron_Swartz) that open source has given us. Any newcomer in this field will have to decide to either go under the wing of someone established, a mentor or corporation and feed from their worth, or make a personal stand. As the first may not be an option for the majority, this leaves them with either an early defeat or a challenge to “prove” themselves... So, "prove" yourself. Do it for you, not the reward.
diff --git a/makesites-insider-201606.md b/makesites-insider-201606.md
@@ -40,4 +40,4 @@ If you're creating open source to compete with other developers, for the glory o
 
 ---
 
-Fast-forward to the end and we all like to recycle the many success stories, the "silent" moderate stories and the few [sad stories](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aaron_Swartz) surrounding open source. Any newcomer in this field will have to decide to either go under the wing of someone established, a mentor or corporation and feed from their worth, or make a personal stand. As the first may not be an option for the majority, this leaves them with either an early defeat or a challenge to “prove” themselves. So, "prove" yourself. Do it for you, not the reward.
+Fast-forward to the end and we all like to recycle the many success stories, the "silent" moderate stories and the few [sad stories](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aaron_Swartz) that open source has given us. Any newcomer in this field will have to decide to either go under the wing of someone established, a mentor or corporation and feed from their worth, or make a personal stand. As the first may not be an option for the majority, this leaves them with either an early defeat or a challenge to “prove” themselves. So, "prove" yourself. Do it for you, not the reward.
diff --git a/makesites-insider-201606.md b/makesites-insider-201606.md
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ Ideas can be strong and if you are right you may be successful, but without an a
 
 ## Big boys know best 
 
-Following the previous mindset, it's anyone's best guess how valuable some open source software is when there is no frame of reference and so corporation-backed open source is often believed to be better supported and with better chances of producing quality solutions. This "power in numbers" mentality is as juvenile as it is shortsighted. In the short history of computer software it's been proven numerous times that individuals with a vision are the major catalysts of change, not corporations with millions in the bank. 
+Following the previous mindset, it's anyone's best guess how valuable some open source software is when there is no frame of reference and so corporation-backed open source is often believed to be better supported and with better chances of producing quality solutions. This "power in numbers" mentality is as juvenile as it is shortsighted. In the brief history of computer software it's been proven numerous times that individuals with a vision are the major catalysts of change, not corporations with millions in the bank. 
 
 Like any enterprise though, creating open source can be serious business. Another popular opinion says that once successful you should expect the competition to be after you, and those with the deepest pockets will have the greatest means to become obstacles in your way. There's no better advice than to simply seek trust within you. Every day there's going to be something new: some new challenge, some new evolution that changes the game for everyone. Open your mind to retain a unique, different view that will help you always be one step ahead. 
 

diff --git a/makesites-insider-201606.md b/makesites-insider-201606.md
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ Ideas can be strong and if you are right you may be successful, but without an a
 
 ## Big boys know best 
 
-Following the previous mindset, it's anyone's best guess how valuable some open source software is when there is no frame of reference and so corporation-backed open source is often believed to be better supported and with better chances of producing quality solutions. This power in numbers mentality is as juvenile as it is shortsighted. In the short history of computer software it's been proven numerous times that individuals with a vision are the major catalysts of change, not corporations with millions in the bank. 
+Following the previous mindset, it's anyone's best guess how valuable some open source software is when there is no frame of reference and so corporation-backed open source is often believed to be better supported and with better chances of producing quality solutions. This "power in numbers" mentality is as juvenile as it is shortsighted. In the short history of computer software it's been proven numerous times that individuals with a vision are the major catalysts of change, not corporations with millions in the bank. 
 
 Like any enterprise though, creating open source can be serious business. Another popular opinion says that once successful you should expect the competition to be after you, and those with the deepest pockets will have the greatest means to become obstacles in your way. There's no better advice than to simply seek trust within you. Every day there's going to be something new: some new challenge, some new evolution that changes the game for everyone. Open your mind to retain a unique, different view that will help you always be one step ahead. 
 

diff --git a/makesites-insider-201606.md b/makesites-insider-201606.md
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ Ideas can be strong and if you are right you may be successful, but without an a
 
 ## Big boys know best 
 
-Following the previous mindset, it's anyones best guess how valuable some open source software is when there is no frame of reference and so corporation-backed open source is often believed to be better supported and with better chances of producing quality solutions. This power in numbers mentality is as juvenile as it is shortsighted. In the short history of computer software it's been proven numerous times that individuals with a vision are the major catalysts of change, not corporations with millions in the bank. 
+Following the previous mindset, it's anyone's best guess how valuable some open source software is when there is no frame of reference and so corporation-backed open source is often believed to be better supported and with better chances of producing quality solutions. This power in numbers mentality is as juvenile as it is shortsighted. In the short history of computer software it's been proven numerous times that individuals with a vision are the major catalysts of change, not corporations with millions in the bank. 
 
 Like any enterprise though, creating open source can be serious business. Another popular opinion says that once successful you should expect the competition to be after you, and those with the deepest pockets will have the greatest means to become obstacles in your way. There's no better advice than to simply seek trust within you. Every day there's going to be something new: some new challenge, some new evolution that changes the game for everyone. Open your mind to retain a unique, different view that will help you always be one step ahead. 
 

diff --git a/makesites-insider-201606.md b/makesites-insider-201606.md
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ This defeatist mentality can be overthrown with some good'ol ambition. The poten
 
 ## Your ideas will be stolen
 
-At first glance it seems obvious. Once an idea is out there anyone can copy it. The reality is that no one cares about ideas because there's no way of evaluating their success. People unanimously are interested in proven solutions. 
+At first glance it seems obvious. Once an idea is out there anyone can copy it. The reality is that no one cares about ideas because there's no way of guaranteeing their success. People unanimously are interested in proven solutions. 
 
 Even law has little regard for intangible concepts. You can only patent an application of an idea, not the idea itself. We live in a world of "doing" because that is fundamentally what affects our surroundings. 
 

diff --git a/makesites-insider-201606.md b/makesites-insider-201606.md
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 # Nothing  source matters 
 
-As software is [dominating our modern society in all regards](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marc_Andreessen#Industry_influence), there are various practices, methodologies and business models surrounding its evolution; although the holy grail of software development could be open source. The community, the personal success stories, the historical paradigm shifts that have changed the world many times are all very compelling for young and ambitious developers alike. Open source may seem as alluring to some as it is unobtainable to others... 
+As software is [dominating our modern society](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marc_Andreessen#Industry_influence) in all regards, there are various practices, methodologies and business models surrounding its evolution; although the holy grail of software development could be open source. The community, the personal success stories, the historical paradigm shifts that have changed the world many times are all very compelling for young and ambitious developers alike. Open source may seem as alluring to some as it is unobtainable to others... 
 
 ---
 

diff --git a/makesites-insider-201606.md b/makesites-insider-201606.md
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ Before releasing anything as open source, before even writing the first line of
 
 This is an obvious first. Doubt. Everyone measures reality based on themselves and if someone thinks they can't do something it's comforting to assume that no one else can either. Our society, our bureaucracy even our education system is based on this false assumption of "equality". Many stop themselves from contributing to open source because they have convinced themselves that they can't contribute. 
 
-This defeatist mentality can be overthrown with some good'ol ambition. The potential of matching others success is enough reason for some to participate in the open source scene. Even if vanity plays a big role for a good share of developers, it's hardly the best driving force. That's because the creation will always be tempered by the alterior motive of personal gain. The software will never be unlimited, untethered from personal goals and completely unrestricted. Aiming for a drive that's more altruistic [has been proven](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_distribution) to produce better results. 
+This defeatist mentality can be overthrown with some good'ol ambition. The potential of matching others success is enough reason for some to participate in the open source scene. Even if vanity plays a big role for a good share of developers, it's hardly the best driving force. That's because the creation will always be tempered by the ulterior motive of personal gain. The software will never be unlimited, untethered from personal goals and completely unrestricted. Aiming for a drive that's more altruistic [has been proven](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_distribution) to produce better results. 
 
 
 ## Your ideas will be stolen

diff --git a/makesites-insider-201606.md b/makesites-insider-201606.md
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ Ideas can be strong and if you are right you may be successful, but without an a
 
 ## Big boys know best 
 
-Folowing the previous mindset, it's anyones best guess how valuable some open source software is when there is no frame of reference and so corporation-backed open source is often believed to be better supported and with better chances of producing quality solutions. This power in numbers mentality is as juvenile as it is shortsighted. In the short history of computer software it's been proven numerous times that individuals with a vision are the major catalysts of change, not corporations with millions in the bank. 
+Following the previous mindset, it's anyones best guess how valuable some open source software is when there is no frame of reference and so corporation-backed open source is often believed to be better supported and with better chances of producing quality solutions. This power in numbers mentality is as juvenile as it is shortsighted. In the short history of computer software it's been proven numerous times that individuals with a vision are the major catalysts of change, not corporations with millions in the bank. 
 
 Like any enterprise though, creating open source can be serious business. Another popular opinion says that once successful you should expect the competition to be after you, and those with the deepest pockets will have the greatest means to become obstacles in your way. There's no better advice than to simply seek trust within you. Every day there's going to be something new: some new challenge, some new evolution that changes the game for everyone. Open your mind to retain a unique, different view that will help you always be one step ahead. 
 

diff --git a/makesites-insider-201606.md b/makesites-insider-201606.md
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ This defeatist mentality can be overthrown with some good'ol ambition. The poten
 
 At first glance it seems obvious. Once an idea is out there anyone can copy it. The reality is that no one cares about ideas because there's no way of evaluating their success. People unanimously are interested in proven solutions. 
 
-Even law has little regard for intangible concepts. You can only pattent an application of an idea, not the idea itself. We live in a world of "doing" because that is fundamentally what affects our surroundings. 
+Even law has little regard for intangible concepts. You can only patent an application of an idea, not the idea itself. We live in a world of "doing" because that is fundamentally what affects our surroundings. 
 
 Ideas can be strong and if you are right you may be successful, but without an application any idea will amount to nothing. On the same vibe, never care for what others know or what mind games they play. When getting into this field, affecting people is our primary goal. 
 

diff --git a/makesites-insider-201606.md b/makesites-insider-201606.md
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ This defeatist mentality can be overthrown with some good'ol ambition. The poten
 
 At first glance it seems obvious. Once an idea is out there anyone can copy it. The reality is that no one cares about ideas because there's no way of evaluating their success. People unanimously are interested in proven solutions. 
 
-Even law has little regard for untangible concepts. You can only pattent an application of an idea, not the idea itself. We live in a world of "doing" because that is fundamentally what affects our surroundings. 
+Even law has little regard for intangible concepts. You can only pattent an application of an idea, not the idea itself. We live in a world of "doing" because that is fundamentally what affects our surroundings. 
 
 Ideas can be strong and if you are right you may be successful, but without an application any idea will amount to nothing. On the same vibe, never care for what others know or what mind games they play. When getting into this field, affecting people is our primary goal. 
 

diff --git a/makesites-insider-201606.md b/makesites-insider-201606.md
@@ -40,4 +40,4 @@ If you're creating open source to compete with other developers, for the glory o
 
 ---
 
-Fast-forward to the end and we all know about the many success stories, the "silent" moderate stories and the few [sad stories](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aaron_Swartz) surrounding open source. As a newcomer in this field you have two options. You go under the wing of someone established, a mentor or corporation and feed from their worth. As this may not be an option for the majority, you are either left with an early defeat or a challenge to "prove" yourself. So, "prove" yourself. For you, not the reward.
+Fast-forward to the end and we all like to recycle the many success stories, the "silent" moderate stories and the few [sad stories](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aaron_Swartz) surrounding open source. Any newcomer in this field will have to decide to either go under the wing of someone established, a mentor or corporation and feed from their worth, or make a personal stand. As the first may not be an option for the majority, this leaves them with either an early defeat or a challenge to “prove” themselves. So, "prove" yourself. Do it for you, not the reward.
diff --git a/makesites-insider-201606.md b/makesites-insider-201606.md
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 # Nothing  source matters 
 
-As software is [dominating our modern society in all regards](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marc_Andreessen#Industry_influence), there are various practices, methodologies and business models surrounding its evolution; although the holy grail of software development could be open source. The community, the personal success stories, the historical paradigm shifts that have changed the world many times are all very compelling for young and ambitious developers alike. Open source may seem as alluring to some as unobtainable to others... 
+As software is [dominating our modern society in all regards](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marc_Andreessen#Industry_influence), there are various practices, methodologies and business models surrounding its evolution; although the holy grail of software development could be open source. The community, the personal success stories, the historical paradigm shifts that have changed the world many times are all very compelling for young and ambitious developers alike. Open source may seem as alluring to some as it is unobtainable to others... 
 
 ---
 

diff --git a/makesites-insider-201606.md b/makesites-insider-201606.md
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 # Nothing  source matters 
 
-As software is [dominating our modern society in all regards](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marc_Andreessen#Industry_influence), there are various practices, methodologies and business models surrounding its evolution; although the holy grail of software development is undoubtedly open source. The community, the personal success stories, the historical paradigm shifts that have changed the world many times are all very compelling for young and ambitious developers alike. Open source may seem as alluring to some as unobtainable to others... 
+As software is [dominating our modern society in all regards](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marc_Andreessen#Industry_influence), there are various practices, methodologies and business models surrounding its evolution; although the holy grail of software development could be open source. The community, the personal success stories, the historical paradigm shifts that have changed the world many times are all very compelling for young and ambitious developers alike. Open source may seem as alluring to some as unobtainable to others... 
 
 ---
 
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ Before releasing anything as open source, before even writing the first line of
 
 ## It's not for you 
 
-This is an obvious first. Doubt. Everyone measures reality based on themselves and if someone thinks they can't do something it's comforting to assume that noone else can't either. Our society, our bureaucracy even our education system is based on this false assumption of "equality". Many stop themselves from contributing to open source because they have convinced themselves that they can't contribute. 
+This is an obvious first. Doubt. Everyone measures reality based on themselves and if someone thinks they can't do something it's comforting to assume that no one else can either. Our society, our bureaucracy even our education system is based on this false assumption of "equality". Many stop themselves from contributing to open source because they have convinced themselves that they can't contribute. 
 
 This defeatist mentality can be overthrown with some good'ol ambition. The potential of matching others success is enough reason for some to participate in the open source scene. Even if vanity plays a big role for a good share of developers, it's hardly the best driving force. That's because the creation will always be tempered by the alterior motive of personal gain. The software will never be unlimited, untethered from personal goals and completely unrestricted. Aiming for a drive that's more altruistic [has been proven](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_distribution) to produce better results. 
 

diff --git a/makesites-insider-201606.md b/makesites-insider-201606.md
@@ -40,4 +40,4 @@ If you're creating open source to compete with other developers, for the glory o
 
 ---
 
-Fast-forward to the end and we all know about the many success stories, the "silent" moderate stories and the few [sad stories](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aaron_Swartz) surrounding open source. As a newcomer in this field you have two options. You go under the wing of someone established, a mentor or corporation and feed from their worth. As this may not be an option for the majority, you are either left with an early defeat or a challenge to "prove" yourself. So, "prove" yourself. For yourself first.
+Fast-forward to the end and we all know about the many success stories, the "silent" moderate stories and the few [sad stories](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aaron_Swartz) surrounding open source. As a newcomer in this field you have two options. You go under the wing of someone established, a mentor or corporation and feed from their worth. As this may not be an option for the majority, you are either left with an early defeat or a challenge to "prove" yourself. So, "prove" yourself. For you, not the reward.
diff --git a/makesites-insider-201606.md b/makesites-insider-201606.md
@@ -36,8 +36,8 @@ Once confronted with the fact that there are no new battles, that there have alr
 
 The answer is simple. Even if software is abundant, the connection you have with your code is unique. Some devs are so close to their code, they can't be disconnected from it no matter how long they are apart. All that matters is that connection to a creation. 
 
-If you're creating open source to compete with other developers, for the glory or for the reward you will most likely end up bitter and betrayed. **Creating open source is not and should not be a popularity contest**. It's a lifestyle choice and a creation marathon. Those who endure, those who persist are the ones left on top. This requires a selfless devotion like a tutor to their students or a monk to their faith.
+If you're creating open source to compete with other developers, for the glory or for the reward you will most likely end up bitter and betrayed. **Creating open source is not and should not be a popularity contest**. It's a lifestyle choice and a creation marathon. Those who endure, those who persist are the ones left on top. This requires a selfless devotion like a parent to their children or a monk to their faith.
 
 ---
 
-Fast-forward to the end and we all know about the many success stories, the "silent" moderate stories and a few [sad stories](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aaron_Swartz) surrounding open source. As a newcomer in this field you have two options. You go under the wing of someone established, a mentor or corporation and feed from their worth. As this may not be an option for the majority, you are either left with an early defeat or a challenge to "prove" yourself. So, "prove" yourself. For yourself first.
+Fast-forward to the end and we all know about the many success stories, the "silent" moderate stories and the few [sad stories](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aaron_Swartz) surrounding open source. As a newcomer in this field you have two options. You go under the wing of someone established, a mentor or corporation and feed from their worth. As this may not be an option for the majority, you are either left with an early defeat or a challenge to "prove" yourself. So, "prove" yourself. For yourself first.
diff --git a/makesites-insider-201606.md b/makesites-insider-201606.md
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 # Nothing  source matters 
 
-As software is [dominating in all regards](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marc_Andreessen#Industry_influence) our modern society, there are various practices, methodologies and business models surrounding its evolution; although the holy grail of software development is undoubtedly open source. The community, the personal success stories, the historical paradigm shifts that have changed the world many times are all very compelling for young and ambitious developers alike. Open source may seem as alluring to some as unobtainable to others... 
+As software is [dominating our modern society in all regards](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marc_Andreessen#Industry_influence), there are various practices, methodologies and business models surrounding its evolution; although the holy grail of software development is undoubtedly open source. The community, the personal success stories, the historical paradigm shifts that have changed the world many times are all very compelling for young and ambitious developers alike. Open source may seem as alluring to some as unobtainable to others... 
 
 ---
 
@@ -9,14 +9,14 @@ Before releasing anything as open source, before even writing the first line of
 
 ## It's not for you 
 
-This is an obvious first. Doubt. Everyone measures reality based on themselves and if someone thinks they can't do something it's comforting to assume that noone else can't either. Our society, our bureaucracy even our education system is based on this false assumption of "equality". Many stop themselves from contributing open source because they have convinced themselves that they can't contribute. 
+This is an obvious first. Doubt. Everyone measures reality based on themselves and if someone thinks they can't do something it's comforting to assume that noone else can't either. Our society, our bureaucracy even our education system is based on this false assumption of "equality". Many stop themselves from contributing to open source because they have convinced themselves that they can't contribute. 
 
-This defeatist mentality can be overthrown with some good'ol ambition. The potential of matching other people's success is enough reason for some to participate in the open source scene. Even if vanity plays a big role for a good share of developers, it's hardly the best driving force. That's because the creation will always be tempered by the alterior motive of personal gain. The software will never be unlimited, untethered from personal goals and completely unrestricted. Aiming for a drive that's more altruistic [has been proven](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_distribution) to produce better results. 
+This defeatist mentality can be overthrown with some good'ol ambition. The potential of matching others success is enough reason for some to participate in the open source scene. Even if vanity plays a big role for a good share of developers, it's hardly the best driving force. That's because the creation will always be tempered by the alterior motive of personal gain. The software will never be unlimited, untethered from personal goals and completely unrestricted. Aiming for a drive that's more altruistic [has been proven](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_distribution) to produce better results. 
 
 
 ## Your ideas will be stolen
 
-At first glance it seems obvious. Once an idea is out there anyone can copy it. The reality is that no one cares about ideas because there's no way of evaluating its success. People unanimously are interested in proven solutions. 
+At first glance it seems obvious. Once an idea is out there anyone can copy it. The reality is that no one cares about ideas because there's no way of evaluating their success. People unanimously are interested in proven solutions. 
 
 Even law has little regard for untangible concepts. You can only pattent an application of an idea, not the idea itself. We live in a world of "doing" because that is fundamentally what affects our surroundings. 
 

diff --git a/makesites-insider-201606.md b/makesites-insider-201606.md
@@ -32,12 +32,12 @@ Like any enterprise though, creating open source can be serious business. Anothe
 
 ## Been there, done that
 
-(aka what's the point/purpose)
+Once confronted with the fact that there are no new battles, that there have already been generations of developers that have fought and retired, the immediate thought is to wonder what's the point of doing anything, especially repeating something that's been done before.
 
-All that matters is your connection to your creation. If you're doing it to compete with well-funded corporations, for the glory or for the you will end up bitter and betrayed. This is not a popularity contest. This is a creation marathon. Those who endure, those who persist are the ones left on top. An the ones that remain get to write history... 
+The answer is simple. Even if software is abundant, the connection you have with your code is unique. Some devs are so close to their code, they can't be disconnected from it no matter how long they are apart. All that matters is that connection to a creation. 
 
-The connection you have with your code is unique. So close to your code, no matter how long you got disconnected from it.  
+If you're creating open source to compete with other developers, for the glory or for the reward you will most likely end up bitter and betrayed. **Creating open source is not and should not be a popularity contest**. It's a lifestyle choice and a creation marathon. Those who endure, those who persist are the ones left on top. This requires a selfless devotion like a tutor to their students or a monk to their faith.
 
 ---
 
-There have been many success stories, stretching the truth at variable levels and a few [sad stories](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aaron_Swartz) surrounding open source. As a newcomer in this field you have two options. You go under the wing of someone established, person or corporation and feed from their worth. This may not be an option for the majority. So you are either left with an early defeat or a challenge to "prove" yourself. 
+Fast-forward to the end and we all know about the many success stories, the "silent" moderate stories and a few [sad stories](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aaron_Swartz) surrounding open source. As a newcomer in this field you have two options. You go under the wing of someone established, a mentor or corporation and feed from their worth. As this may not be an option for the majority, you are either left with an early defeat or a challenge to "prove" yourself. So, "prove" yourself. For yourself first.
diff --git a/makesites-insider-201606.md b/makesites-insider-201606.md
@@ -1,37 +1,33 @@
 # Nothing  source matters 
 
-As software is [dominating in all regards](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marc_Andreessen#Industry_influence) our modern society, there are various practices, methodologies and business models surrounding its evolution; although the holy grail of software development is undoubtedly open source. The community, the personal success stories, the historical paradigm shifts that have changed the world many times are all very compelling for young and ambitious developers alike. Open source may seem as alluring to some as unobtainable to others.  
+As software is [dominating in all regards](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marc_Andreessen#Industry_influence) our modern society, there are various practices, methodologies and business models surrounding its evolution; although the holy grail of software development is undoubtedly open source. The community, the personal success stories, the historical paradigm shifts that have changed the world many times are all very compelling for young and ambitious developers alike. Open source may seem as alluring to some as unobtainable to others... 
 
 ---
 
-Before releasing anything as open source, before even writing the first line of code, there are questions haunting any developer's subconscious; even external factors from third-party reactions that can pressure or worse deter anyone from contributing to open source. 
+Before releasing anything as open source, before even writing the first line of code, there are questions haunting any developer's subconscious; even external factors from third-parties and their reactions that can pressure or worse deter anyone from contributing any open source. 
 
 
 ## It's not for you 
 
-This is an obvious first. Doubt. People measure reality based on themselves and if they think they can't do something it's comforting to assume that noone else can either. Our society, our bureaucracy even our education system is based on this false assumption of "equality". Many stop themselves from contributing open source because they have convinced themselves that they can't contribute anything. 
+This is an obvious first. Doubt. Everyone measures reality based on themselves and if someone thinks they can't do something it's comforting to assume that noone else can't either. Our society, our bureaucracy even our education system is based on this false assumption of "equality". Many stop themselves from contributing open source because they have convinced themselves that they can't contribute. 
 
-This defeatist mentality can be overthrown with some good'ol ambition. The potential of matching other people's success is enough reason for some to participate in the open source scene. Even if vanity plays a big role for a good share of developers it's hardly the best driving force. That's because the creation will always be tempered by the alterior motive of personal gain. The software will never be unlimited, untethered from personal goals and completely unrestricted. Aiming for a drive that's more altruistic [has been proven](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_distribution) to produce better results. 
+This defeatist mentality can be overthrown with some good'ol ambition. The potential of matching other people's success is enough reason for some to participate in the open source scene. Even if vanity plays a big role for a good share of developers, it's hardly the best driving force. That's because the creation will always be tempered by the alterior motive of personal gain. The software will never be unlimited, untethered from personal goals and completely unrestricted. Aiming for a drive that's more altruistic [has been proven](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_distribution) to produce better results. 
 
 
 ## Your ideas will be stolen
 
-At first glance it seems obvious. Once an idea is out there anyone can copy it. The reality is that no one cares about ideas because there's have no way of evaluating its success. People unanimously are interested in working solutions. 
+At first glance it seems obvious. Once an idea is out there anyone can copy it. The reality is that no one cares about ideas because there's no way of evaluating its success. People unanimously are interested in proven solutions. 
 
 Even law has little regard for untangible concepts. You can only pattent an application of an idea, not the idea itself. We live in a world of "doing" because that is fundamentally what affects our surroundings. 
 
-Ideas can be strong and if you are right you may be successful, but without an application any idea will amount to nothing. On the same vibe, never care for what others know or what games they play. When getting into this field, affecting people is our primary goal. 
+Ideas can be strong and if you are right you may be successful, but without an application any idea will amount to nothing. On the same vibe, never care for what others know or what mind games they play. When getting into this field, affecting people is our primary goal. 
 
 
 ## Big boys know best 
 
-The Competition will be after you. 
+Folowing the previous mindset, it's anyones best guess how valuable some open source software is when there is no frame of reference and so corporation-backed open source is often believed to be better supported and with better chances of producing quality solutions. This power in numbers mentality is as juvenile as it is shortsighted. In the short history of computer software it's been proven numerous times that individuals with a vision are the major catalysts of change, not corporations with millions in the bank. 
 
-Folowing the previous mindset, it's anyones best guess how valuable any open source software is when there is no frame of reference and so corporation-backed open source is often believed to be better supported and with better chances of producing quality solutions. This power in numbers mentality is as juvenile as it is shortsighted.
-
-Like any enterprise, creating open source can be serious business. 
-
-Seek trust within you... Every day there's going to be something new Open your mind to get that different view
+Like any enterprise though, creating open source can be serious business. Another popular opinion says that once successful you should expect the competition to be after you, and those with the deepest pockets will have the greatest means to become obstacles in your way. There's no better advice than to simply seek trust within you. Every day there's going to be something new: some new challenge, some new evolution that changes the game for everyone. Open your mind to retain a unique, different view that will help you always be one step ahead. 
 
 
 ## Been there, done that

diff --git a/makesites-insider-201606.md b/makesites-insider-201606.md
@@ -1,46 +1,47 @@
 # Nothing  source matters 
 
-A checklist for anyone starting out in the open source scene. 
+As software is [dominating in all regards](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marc_Andreessen#Industry_influence) our modern society, there are various practices, methodologies and business models surrounding its evolution; although the holy grail of software development is undoubtedly open source. The community, the personal success stories, the historical paradigm shifts that have changed the world many times are all very compelling for young and ambitious developers alike. Open source may seem as alluring to some as unobtainable to others.  
 
-Like any enterprise, creating open source can be serious business. 
+---
 
-Seek trust within you... Every day there's going to be something new Open your mind to get that different view
+Before releasing anything as open source, before even writing the first line of code, there are questions haunting any developer's subconscious; even external factors from third-party reactions that can pressure or worse deter anyone from contributing to open source. 
 
-The connection you have with your code is unique. So close to your code, no matter how long you got disconnected from it.  
 
-For the few that used your code you'll be forever trusting who you are
+## It's not for you 
+
+This is an obvious first. Doubt. People measure reality based on themselves and if they think they can't do something it's comforting to assume that noone else can either. Our society, our bureaucracy even our education system is based on this false assumption of "equality". Many stop themselves from contributing open source because they have convinced themselves that they can't contribute anything. 
 
+This defeatist mentality can be overthrown with some good'ol ambition. The potential of matching other people's success is enough reason for some to participate in the open source scene. Even if vanity plays a big role for a good share of developers it's hardly the best driving force. That's because the creation will always be tempered by the alterior motive of personal gain. The software will never be unlimited, untethered from personal goals and completely unrestricted. Aiming for a drive that's more altruistic [has been proven](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_distribution) to produce better results. 
 
-## It's not for you 
 
-Vanity plays a huge role for some; it's their drive.. Your drive should be above that level...
+## Your ideas will be stolen
 
-There have been many success stories, stretching the truth at variable levels and a few [sad stories](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aaron_Swartz). As a newcomer in a field you have two options. You go under the wing of someone established, person or corporation and feed from their worth. This may not be an option for the majority. So you are either left with an early defeat or a challenge to "prove" yourself. 
+At first glance it seems obvious. Once an idea is out there anyone can copy it. The reality is that no one cares about ideas because there's have no way of evaluating its success. People unanimously are interested in working solutions. 
 
-Create an article about what is useful open source, not the open source that’s meant to be promoting people or a bunch of tech demos that are impressive but cannot be reproduced in real world projects, because the code is too rigid, hard-coded or not modularized. 
+Even law has little regard for untangible concepts. You can only pattent an application of an idea, not the idea itself. We live in a world of "doing" because that is fundamentally what affects our surroundings. 
 
+Ideas can be strong and if you are right you may be successful, but without an application any idea will amount to nothing. On the same vibe, never care for what others know or what games they play. When getting into this field, affecting people is our primary goal. 
 
-## You can't do it 
+
+## Big boys know best 
 
 The Competition will be after you. 
 
+Folowing the previous mindset, it's anyones best guess how valuable any open source software is when there is no frame of reference and so corporation-backed open source is often believed to be better supported and with better chances of producing quality solutions. This power in numbers mentality is as juvenile as it is shortsighted.
 
-Talk about people having a hrd-time understanding what is quality open source 
+Like any enterprise, creating open source can be serious business. 
 
-Corporation-backed open source is believed to be better supported…
+Seek trust within you... Every day there's going to be something new Open your mind to get that different view
 
 
 ## Been there, done that
 
-(aka what's the pint/purpose)
+(aka what's the point/purpose)
 
 All that matters is your connection to your creation. If you're doing it to compete with well-funded corporations, for the glory or for the you will end up bitter and betrayed. This is not a popularity contest. This is a creation marathon. Those who endure, those who persist are the ones left on top. An the ones that remain get to write history... 
 
-Never care for what they do, Never care for what they know. Never care for games they play...
-
-
-
-## Big boys know best 
+The connection you have with your code is unique. So close to your code, no matter how long you got disconnected from it.  
 
+---
 
-When getting into this field affecting people should be our primary goal. 
+There have been many success stories, stretching the truth at variable levels and a few [sad stories](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aaron_Swartz) surrounding open source. As a newcomer in this field you have two options. You go under the wing of someone established, person or corporation and feed from their worth. This may not be an option for the majority. So you are either left with an early defeat or a challenge to "prove" yourself. 
diff --git a/makesites-insider-201606.md b/makesites-insider-201606.md
@@ -42,6 +42,5 @@ Never care for what they do, Never care for what they know. Never care for games
 
 ## Big boys know best 
 
-Ultimately, it doesn't matter how much source you release. As with most professions it doesn't matter how much time or effort you put into something. Only how much it affected people's life. All "negative" aspects of open source like theft, appropriation utlimately have the goal of broadening the effect of open source. An altuistic mind understands there is no real downside to open source. 
 
 When getting into this field affecting people should be our primary goal. 
diff --git a/makesites-insider-201606.md b/makesites-insider-201606.md
@@ -2,37 +2,38 @@
 
 A checklist for anyone starting out in the open source scene. 
 
-
-
 Like any enterprise, creating open source can be serious business. 
 
 Seek trust within you... Every day there's going to be something new Open your mind to get that different view
 
-
 The connection you have with your code is unique. So close to your code, no matter how long you got disconnected from it.  
 
 For the few that used your code you'll be forever trusting who you are
 
 
-## The Drive
 ## It's not for you 
 
+Vanity plays a huge role for some; it's their drive.. Your drive should be above that level...
+
 There have been many success stories, stretching the truth at variable levels and a few [sad stories](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aaron_Swartz). As a newcomer in a field you have two options. You go under the wing of someone established, person or corporation and feed from their worth. This may not be an option for the majority. So you are either left with an early defeat or a challenge to "prove" yourself. 
 
 Create an article about what is useful open source, not the open source that’s meant to be promoting people or a bunch of tech demos that are impressive but cannot be reproduced in real world projects, because the code is too rigid, hard-coded or not modularized. 
 
-Vanity 
 
-## The Competition
-## You can do it 
+## You can't do it 
+
+The Competition will be after you. 
+
 
 Talk about people having a hrd-time understanding what is quality open source 
 
 Corporation-backed open source is believed to be better supported…
 
-## The Purpose
+
 ## Been there, done that
 
+(aka what's the pint/purpose)
+
 All that matters is your connection to your creation. If you're doing it to compete with well-funded corporations, for the glory or for the you will end up bitter and betrayed. This is not a popularity contest. This is a creation marathon. Those who endure, those who persist are the ones left on top. An the ones that remain get to write history... 
 
 Never care for what they do, Never care for what they know. Never care for games they play...
@@ -41,8 +42,6 @@ Never care for what they do, Never care for what they know. Never care for games
 
 ## Big boys know best 
 
-
-
 Ultimately, it doesn't matter how much source you release. As with most professions it doesn't matter how much time or effort you put into something. Only how much it affected people's life. All "negative" aspects of open source like theft, appropriation utlimately have the goal of broadening the effect of open source. An altuistic mind understands there is no real downside to open source. 
 
 When getting into this field affecting people should be our primary goal. 
diff --git a/makesites-insider-201606.md b/makesites-insider-201606.md
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ Never care for what they do, Never care for what they know. Never care for games
 
 
 
-## Corps know best 
+## Big boys know best
Original file line number	Diff line number	Diff line change
		@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ Never care for what they do, Never care for what they know. Never care for games



		## Corps know best
		## Big boys know best