Last active
June 24, 2021 07:56
-
-
Save tayvano/4fab15926fc3aae9632bde40cdd0e530 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
This file has been truncated, but you can view the full file.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| 1101540122384691200 2019-03-01 09:50:05 -0700 <econoar> I think fixing the current first auction fee model is extremely important. It's inefficient and a large UX barrier. We can achieve this through a fixed fee type model described by @VitalikButerin in EIP-1559. I've opened up a discussion on @EthMagicians https://t.co/OhwrCEn1jA | 6 replies 11 retweets 69 likes | |
| 1101541816682274816 2019-03-01 09:56:49 -0700 <crn_maximizer> @econoar @VitalikButerin @EthMagicians How much money could casual users save on average every month with EIP-1559? | 1 replies 0 retweets 7 likes | |
| 1101614367055896576 2019-03-01 14:45:06 -0700 <crn_maximizer> @jemenger @RyanSAdams One solution to gentrification is synchronous shard comms, which would eliminate the geographical metaphor. Another is EIP-1559 which keeps gas low and predictable. Without at least one, I don't see how cheap dapps avoid being priced out by high fees when expensive dapps move in. | 1 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1101616725211017216 2019-03-01 14:54:28 -0700 <jemenger> @crn_maximizer @RyanSAdams I was just opening EIP-1559 up today to learn about it... https://t.co/mGCY34fpvT | 0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1101643078077763584 2019-03-01 16:39:12 -0700 <ViniciusLibero> https://t.co/mI84X8facn VitalikButerin I think fixing the current first auction fee model is extremely important. It's inefficient and a large UX barrier. We can achieve this through a fixed fee type model described by @VitalikButerin in EIP-1559. I… https://t.co/IrROJwlf43 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1101737104843800577 2019-03-01 22:52:49 -0700 <econoar> Working on a good explainer article for EIP-1559. Excited about the opportunity to fix the current broken fee auction model which will insure Eth isn’t wasted on gas pricing, fix UX and lots more! | 0 replies 2 retweets 21 likes | |
| 1102585476245045249 2019-03-04 07:03:57 -0700 <cryptow1re> reddit 🤖: Fixing the Ethereum Fee Market (EIP-1559) https://t.co/zbNqPJKxOb | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1102586934159990784 2019-03-04 07:09:44 -0700 <cryptow1re> #ethtrader 🤖: Fixing the Ethereum Fee Market (EIP-1559) https://t.co/468055cY5a | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1102587101793734656 2019-03-04 07:10:24 -0700 <DomainAddress4u> Fixing the Ethereum Fee Market (EIP-1559) via /r/ethereum https://t.co/YxNJSf80zr hot 🔥 in #reddit #ethereum #eth #crypto | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1102592446884663296 2019-03-04 07:31:39 -0700 <DEXAG_TokenWire> Fixing the Ethereum Fee Market (EIP-1559) https://t.co/q50s8oiSdz | 0 replies 1 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1102599363979853824 2019-03-04 07:59:08 -0700 <NassimGhorayeb> EIP-1559 is a great way to make ethereum more user-friendly! Thank you @econoar for the write up. | 0 replies 0 retweets 10 likes | |
| 1102623938327109632 2019-03-04 09:36:47 -0700 <sailbeach> Fixing the #Ethereum Fee Market #EIP1559 https://t.co/vVWOkjzorG #Blockchain #Constantinople #Ether #SmartContracts #ERC20 #Ganache #Truffle #Hyperledger #Solidity #Parity #Bitcoin #BusinessBlockchain #BlockchainForBusiness | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1102672584540336129 2019-03-04 12:50:05 -0700 <the_crypto_feed> /r/ethereum: fixing the ethereum fee market (eip-1559) https://t.co/0116xJ9x27 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1103016675891441664 2019-03-05 11:37:23 -0700 <bitcoinsguide> Ethereum Developer Proposes New EIP-1559 To Slash Gas Fees Down 90% https://t.co/r8m2Ll2v5u Developer Proposes A New EIP To Save 90% Of Ethereum Transaction Costs Every transaction on the second-largest blockchain Ethereum has some cost attached to it. One must pay for doing an… | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1103028793625571328 2019-03-05 12:25:32 -0700 <joshuahjohnson> @EthereumJesus If EIP 1559 makes it in! | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1103504521303478272 2019-03-06 19:55:54 -0700 <econoar> While the main focus of EIP-1559 is to fix pricing inefficiencies and UX issues of the Ethereum fee market, it also has strong economic benefits: -Burns ETH with every transaction, shrinking supply. -Cements ETH being required for fees, killing economic abstraction. | 4 replies 8 retweets 40 likes | |
| 1103840096543924224 2019-03-07 18:09:22 -0700 <econoar> @VitalikButerin @cyounessi1 @_DatMine_ @RyanSAdams @Delphi_Digital *inserts shameless plug for EIP-1559* | 0 replies 1 retweets 10 likes | |
| 1104527133383278593 2019-03-09 15:39:24 -0700 <RaymondDurk> I recommended “Fixing the Ethereum Fee Market (EIP-1559)” on @Medium https://t.co/qiN5G7xLCR | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1104820459013632001 2019-03-10 12:04:58 -0700 <crn_maximizer> @cyber_hokie @EtherSummary @RyanSAdams Interestingly, the EIP1559 fix would actually make gas prices predictable enough that defaults would actually let you pay exactly the right amount. No overpaying. It's only in the current system that defaults are not so good. This would help improve public perception too. | 1 replies 1 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1105067886219939840 2019-03-11 04:28:09 -0700 <sassal0x> This week in crypto - Birthday Edition 🥳 -@ethhub_io bounties launched 😍 -@DharmaProtocol adds support for DAI 💸 -@GetGitcoin details the Gitcoin Torch 🔦 -@jobsincrypto now featured in the newsletter 👨💼 -@econoar details EIP-1559 ⛏️ More 👇 https://t.co/TykGSip6nr | 1 replies 9 retweets 19 likes | |
| 1105184592405786624 2019-03-11 12:11:54 -0700 <econoar> Economic abstraction deals with the idea that something other than the native coin can be used to pay miners. It's technically possible to do this in PoW chains today but is complex. One of my favorite parts of EIP-1559 is it kills EA and makes ETH necessary on the base layer. | 2 replies 3 retweets 24 likes | |
| 1105324045543723008 2019-03-11 21:26:03 -0700 <1cent88> EIP-1559 ガスの最適化 新規ユーザーへの障壁が下がる。 https://t.co/k3bRtAT9Dz | 0 replies 1 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1106574468812546051 2019-03-15 08:14:47 -0700 <TimBeiko> .@VitalikButerin brings up EIP-1559, which he won't be there to talk about. Wondering if we can have remote presenters too. https://t.co/5Lndk7wOV2 | 3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1106579098263003137 2019-03-15 08:33:10 -0700 <mr_ligi> @VitalikButerin @pedrouid @gluk64 @thebitsian @gakonst @ricburton @vikmeup @recmo As far as I see this is not really needed anymore after EIP-1559 right? | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1106623412015759360 2019-03-15 11:29:16 -0700 <econoar> @TimBeiko @VitalikButerin Cannot make Berlin but down to help talk about EIP-1559 too if needed. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1109274556106051585 2019-03-22 19:03:58 -0700 <econoar> While everyone is fretting over a PoW algorithm that’ll have no relevance in 5 years... Let’s focus on EIP-1559. It would allow us to fix the inefficient fee market, make Ethereum more user friendly, kill economic abstraction and lower total issuance %. https://t.co/0HvAKopGBI | 1 replies 16 retweets 99 likes | |
| 1109275399798689797 2019-03-22 19:07:19 -0700 <sassal0x> @econoar EIP-1559 for president! | 0 replies 0 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1110397174427213825 2019-03-25 21:24:51 -0700 <devnullius> EIP 1559：修正以太坊交易费用市场 https://t.co/9BWuUbXe4D | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1111044953164136450 2019-03-27 16:18:53 -0700 <trent_vanepps> @VitalikButerin @zmanian @AFDudley0 @econoar VB lol check your email. been trying to get ahold of you for EIP 1559. or DM | 0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1111630427935121408 2019-03-29 07:05:21 -0700 <econoar> Ethereum core devs call happening now. EIP-1559 is on the agenda for discussion! https://t.co/YPRLaelTKc | 1 replies 4 retweets 23 likes | |
| 1111637033439633408 2019-03-29 07:31:36 -0700 <TimBeiko> Quick comment about EIP-1559, proposed by Vitalik, not being formatted according to the EIP standards. Needs to update that if it is to be considered for Istanbul 😛 https://t.co/DwmRB4Cb9n | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1112849204525850626 2019-04-01 15:48:20 -0700 <devnullius> Ethereum Developer Proposes New EIP-1559 To Slash Gas Fees Down 90% https://t.co/mPMJ6raZ52 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1113025310252064768 2019-04-02 03:28:07 -0700 <devnullius> EIP 1559：修正以太坊交易费用市场 https://t.co/9BWuUbFDd5 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1113172983676325889 2019-04-02 13:14:55 -0700 <devnullius> Eric Conner 知道自己在干啥吗：EIP-1559 的经济学分析 https://t.co/rhKfKuj6WB | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1114748885845417985 2019-04-06 21:37:00 -0700 <imai_ryouji> 現在のEthereumエコシステムでは、「GASの設定」はオークション形式であるがために、適正価格の見積もりが難しい。 Vitalik Buterinが提案する「EIP-1559」は、この問題を解決する。 https://t.co/0MgpOxPW48 | 0 replies 1 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1115363120405307392 2019-04-08 14:17:45 -0700 <econoar> @nicksdjohnson @MolochDAO It definitely could. Although, I need to think of it in the content of eip-1559 proposal too, could be interesting. Although, I know miners would must prefer this proposal than taking a chunk of current rewards. Raising rewards from today is a non-starter to me. | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1116804041349013504 2019-04-12 13:43:27 -0700 <econoar> Get your questions about EIP-1559 in here. | 2 replies 1 retweets 10 likes | |
| 1116813819941216256 2019-04-12 14:22:18 -0700 <0x_____________> if you arent in favor of EIP-1559, then u trippin https://t.co/oE5IWUVCNn | 1 replies 1 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1117908128400412672 2019-04-15 14:50:42 -0700 <trent_vanepps> @VitalikButerin it wld be great if you could confirm your speaking slot for EIP 1559 for the 18th. otherwise I'll give it away (jk, please don't turn off my node 😅) I'm dyin out here. now I'm just going to mass tag and hope someone acts as go-between | 1 replies 1 retweets 10 likes | |
| 1118013388762693632 2019-04-15 21:48:58 -0700 <econoar> EIP-1559 is officially submitted and I look forward to the Berlin discussions around it this week. Let’s try to fix the inefficient fee market! https://t.co/TfKRNvEfPN | 2 replies 8 retweets 25 likes | |
| 1118016713767911424 2019-04-15 22:02:10 -0700 <bmann> #eip1559 Fee Market change for #eth1x now has a PR for an EIP. Discussion here https://t.co/JrxHfu0W2R Thanks @econoar for teaming with @VitalikButerin on this! | 0 replies 0 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1118035493499707392 2019-04-15 23:16:48 -0700 <mattwiIIemsen> 7/ 🧢 @VitalikButerin and @econoar submitted #EIP1559: a way to replace the current "first price auction" fee model in Ethereum, which they believe is "inefficient and needlessly costly to users." The idea was initially floated by Eric back on March 2. https://t.co/PyDCfRpSlc | 1 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1118319751531393024 2019-04-16 18:06:20 -0700 <edmundedgar> Ethereum is already a great platform for L2 systems, but we can make it better with @VitalikButerin's #EIP1559, which would remove a lot of congestion-related fragility. Let's do #EIP1559. https://t.co/yIdUnWcQgi | 0 replies 1 retweets 15 likes | |
| 1118535824650461187 2019-04-17 08:24:56 -0700 <lrettig> @bmann closes out the day with a preview of tomorrow's schedule: Ewasm, @VitalikButerin on EIP1559, @cdetrio on gastoken, @owocki on block rewards, @shemnon on #progpow, @virgilgr on precompiles and Oasis, @recmo, HF schedule planning. See you back here bright and early tomorrow! https://t.co/cnpIAepjqJ | 0 replies 0 retweets 6 likes | |
| 1118791058173853696 2019-04-18 01:19:09 -0700 <trent_vanepps> Good morning beautiful people! Today we are streaming from the Eth Cat Herders account. Topics today include: ProgPow @shemnon EWASM Roadmap @cdetrio EIP 1559 - fee market change @VitalikButerin Gas token - @cdetrio Block reward funding - @owocki https://t.co/W0kaSwAklF | 1 replies 3 retweets 12 likes | |
| 1118801777690914817 2019-04-18 02:01:44 -0700 <trent_vanepps> @ethereum Talks today: ProgPow @shemnon EWASM Roadmap (@cdetrio, team) EIP 1559 - fee market change @VitalikButerin Gas token - @cdetrio Block reward funding - @owocki Blake Precompile - @virgilgr OASIS EIP stewardship proposal - @virgilgr Istanbul HF / 1.x Coordination session | 0 replies 2 retweets 8 likes | |
| 1118810177548050432 2019-04-18 02:35:07 -0700 <bmann> We’ve got @VitalikButerin presenting remotely on #eip1559 Transaction Fee Economics https://t.co/So3WZzpPS9 #coredevsberlin | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1118810985337430016 2019-04-18 02:38:20 -0700 <lrettig> Next up @VitalikButerin joins us remotely to discuss transaction fee economics and EIP1559. Gas pricing today is effectively a "cap and trade" first-price auction which is economically inefficient. Slides: https://t.co/a3hUKRB9mI https://t.co/hafiZAmcsb | 1 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1118826256676605953 2019-04-18 03:39:01 -0700 <bmann> Very interesting point made as part of Q&A after Vitalik’s - #eip1559 is an example of a set of non-major-client proposals. If we want broad proposals and implementations, we need to secure funding for these non-major-client teams #coredevsberlin | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1118941792559407105 2019-04-18 11:18:06 -0700 <MartinLundfall> Tx fees are subject to the same misalignment. Txs incur a social cost on the network as a whole, but only miners get to pocket the fees. Vitaliks analysis of these dynamics https://t.co/vcTyvvx5l7 motivated EIP-1559 https://t.co/byMjYJWpnE which mitigates things slightly | 0 replies 1 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1119717288666640384 2019-04-20 14:39:39 -0700 <0x_____________> @AdamLuciano @econoar fees will be burned if EIP-1559 is added https://t.co/oE5IWUVCNn | 0 replies 0 retweets 6 likes | |
| 1120366513322545153 2019-04-22 09:39:26 -0700 <econoar> I'm really happy with the way Eth 2.0 issuance was proposed, researched, discussed and then tweaked. The latest numbers look really healthy at 30,000,000 ETH staked: -937,500 validators -0.5% network issuance* -5% validator return* *assumes some burn rate due to eip-1559 | 3 replies 11 retweets 73 likes | |
| 1120372507943501824 2019-04-22 10:03:16 -0700 <cryptow1re> reddit 🤖: EIP-1559 - cementing the economic value of ETH https://t.co/gLrwCjeWVd | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1120393916640124933 2019-04-22 11:28:20 -0700 <TrustlessState> @econoar How’s the sentiment around EIP 1559 been? General consensus is...? | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1120585530553581568 2019-04-23 00:09:44 -0700 <DomainAddress4u> EIP-1559 - cementing the economic value of ETH via /r/ethereum https://t.co/TxpAxDk2h3 hot 🔥 in #reddit #ethereum #eth #crypto | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1120730685843488768 2019-04-23 09:46:32 -0700 <ethhub_io> A new EthHub Weekly Recap is live! -EthHub community forum launch -EIP-1559 discussed in Berlin -EY Nightfall announced -@ConsenSys seeks $200mn -Eth 2.0 validator reward increase -@ensdomains upgrade coming -@Dharma_HQ ReFi w/ DeFi -@cdetrio on Eth 1.x https://t.co/Ob8FEYP48V | 1 replies 12 retweets 36 likes | |
| 1120730976198381569 2019-04-23 09:47:41 -0700 <CryptoEliteNews> EthHub Weekly Recap: EthHub community forum, EIP-1559 progress, EY Nightfall, ConsenSys raising mone... On the EthHub Weekly Recap we cover topics from the EthHub Weekly Newsletter . In this episode we discuss the upcoming Ethereal Hackath... #eth #defi https://t.co/w03tBnzfaL | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1122840407950315520 2019-04-29 05:29:49 -0700 <sassal0x> This week in crypto: -@UniswapExchange announces formation of company & funding 🦄 -@MyCrypto supported @Ambo mobile wallet now live on iOS 📱 -@realLedgerwatch announced the formation of a EIP-1559 working group 👨💼 -@MolochDAO updates 👹 Much more 👇 https://t.co/H4bppIj6lR | 3 replies 24 retweets 76 likes | |
| 1123086486390263810 2019-04-29 21:47:38 -0700 <econoar> EIP-1559 update... 1. @VitalikButerin presented the EIP at the Istanbul planning meeting: https://t.co/clNzHF8PZI 2. The presentation deck: https://t.co/sDSjy3g0PN 3. @AFDudley0 has stepped up to lead the working group. 4. Ongoing discussion here: https://t.co/OhwrCEn1jA | 0 replies 10 retweets 36 likes | |
| 1123372971064606721 2019-04-30 16:46:02 -0700 <CryptoEliteNews> EthHub Weekly Recap: EthHub community forum, EIP-1559 progress, EY Nightfall, ConsenSys raising mone... On the EthHub Weekly Recap we cover topics from the EthHub Weekly Newsletter . In this episode we discuss the upcoming Ethereal Hackath... #eth #defi https://t.co/0T48TJwZZb | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1123384453181595648 2019-04-30 17:31:39 -0700 <ethhub_io> A new EthHub Weekly Recap is live! -@ChazSchmidt EGS Garage -More Tether drama -Samsung developing on Ethereum -@UniswapExchange gets funding -ETH 2.0 moving along nicely -EIP-1559 working group (led by @AFDudley0) -Dai stability fee up again https://t.co/DYOT3j1YNl | 2 replies 11 retweets 51 likes | |
| 1125374751986388992 2019-05-06 05:20:23 -0700 <bitcointe> EIP-1559 – cementing the economic value of ETH https://t.co/kEO1d5ebnl | Ethereum (ETH) | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1128293326489247745 2019-05-14 06:37:46 -0700 <econoar> @sassal0x @Ethereum_John @udiWertheimer Also won’t matter once eip-1559 goes in which cements eth at the base layer as required for fees (burned). | 1 replies 2 retweets 16 likes | |
| 1128305992540749824 2019-05-14 07:28:06 -0700 <BlockEnthusiast> Ethereum is reworking how the gas fee market works (EIP-1559). This is a great change that will make gas mechanisms simpler for users, reduce overspending, and reduce delays getting transactions included. Check it out here: https://t.co/pJmRgpAmbI | 0 replies 1 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1128832471318061058 2019-05-15 18:20:08 -0700 <JHancock> @ck_SNARKs @TCRPartyBot More concrete example: Stable transaction fees would be a value-add for wallets. (EIP-1559) There are a lot of wallet orgs in the space. They could get together to fund it. But could they really? Not today. The coordination system doesn’t exist for this. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1128850260623745024 2019-05-15 19:30:49 -0700 <crn_maximizer> @sassal0x @francispouliot_ @La__Cuen @polychaincap The best part is that people will one day pay for their bitcoin transactions in ETH. After EIP 1559, economic abstraction won't technically be possible. So if you move some BTC over to Ethereum (as wrapped BTC), you can pay for BTC tx with your ETH. Welcome to the future 😉 | 2 replies 2 retweets 21 likes | |
| 1129149702677716994 2019-05-16 15:20:42 -0700 <ETHGasStation> Are you experiencing gas price frustrations today? EIP-1559 might be the fix you need. Shoutout to @econoar for his input on the matter! https://t.co/QUiKXN5RJJ #Ethereum | 0 replies 12 retweets 36 likes | |
| 1130368330706165760 2019-05-20 00:03:05 -0700 <k06a> EIP-1559: Replacing current “HIGH VOLATILITY gas price scheme” + “transactions prioritized by EXPLICIT GAS PRICE” with “LOW VOLATILITY gas price scheme” + “transactions prioritized by IMPLICIT GAS PRICE” adjusting base gas price from block to block #fitEIPinTweet @VitalikButerin | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1131710288682659840 2019-05-23 16:55:33 -0700 <sassal0x> @econoar -Better fee estimations from wallets (this will improve with EIP-1559 of course) -Meta-transactions everywhere | 1 replies 1 retweets 12 likes | |
| 1131863675159998464 2019-05-24 03:05:03 -0700 <AurtrianAjian> I just published An Economic Analysis on EIP-1559 https://t.co/Cu8JJdeHfd | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1131942119373975552 2019-05-24 08:16:46 -0700 <TimBeiko> Hudson breaks from the ordered list to get EIP champions on the call to talk about their EIPs. @AFDudley0 says it's unlikely that EIP-1559 ( https://t.co/8jrq0aT4gn) makes it into Istanbul. There is a lot of progress being made, but it's a big change. April fork is likelier. | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1133808396203954178 2019-05-29 11:52:41 -0700 <nanexcool> https://t.co/eIpauEa0f4 EIP 1559: Fee market change for ETH 1.0 chain @VitalikButerin or @econoar can better explain this. Will help make tx gas costs better and more predictable. During last call, people said it was not a trivial change so unsure if it will go in. | 1 replies 0 retweets 10 likes | |
| 1133900078773497856 2019-05-29 17:57:00 -0700 <econoar> @nlw @nanexcool I’ve been helping to push eip-1559. Huge fan of that one. | 2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1133955808771944448 2019-05-29 21:38:27 -0700 <DisruptionJoe> What do you think of this gas fee improvement proposal? @paulcowgill @lisperati @davehoover @conroydave Fixing the Ethereum Fee Market (EIP-1559) | 1 replies 2 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1134490466358104064 2019-05-31 09:02:59 -0700 <trent_vanepps> Want to see EIP 1559 for reals? @econoar / @VitalikButerin RT for reach. @madeof_tin / @AFDudley0 are seeking: 1⃣ Senior Geth Dev : to prototype an experimental client 1⃣ Wallet dev : to make a PoC wallet to accommodate new tx types Or ping James here: https://t.co/jb1Lf4anoy | 5 replies 20 retweets 54 likes | |
| 1134732686801612803 2019-06-01 01:05:29 -0700 <TrustlessState> EIP 1559 = the biggest bull EIP for Ether ever proposed. | 1 replies 5 retweets 19 likes | |
| 1135530239998611456 2019-06-03 05:54:41 -0700 <CryptoEliteNews> EthHub Weekly #64 Curated by Anthony Sassano (@sassal0x) and Eric Conner (@econoar) 📢 Calling All Devs The EIP-1559 working group is in need of a senior Geth developer to prototype an experimental clien... #developer #ethhub #poc https://t.co/oXntqjo6jL | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1135582334495875073 2019-06-03 09:21:41 -0700 <hosseeb> Blockchain fees are broken. In this blog post, I explain the 3 most important proposals on how to improve fees, including the #EOS no-fee model, #Ethereum's EIP-1559 which will probably land this year, and a new proposal from researchers at Cornell. https://t.co/L7pmR1Di8S | 13 replies 43 retweets 120 likes | |
| 1135634804614074370 2019-06-03 12:50:11 -0700 <MihailoBjelic> Nice post on blockchain tx fees with a great explanation of EIP-1559, @econoar and @VitalikButerin's proposal for Ethereum fee market change. @hosseeb 👌 https://t.co/oq9lHtgJUF | 18 replies 49 retweets 139 likes | |
| 1135640176707981317 2019-06-03 13:11:31 -0700 <AlexanderFisher> Very excited about EIP-1559 after reading this article about fee economies. Great work by @VitalikButerin and @econoar on writing this to greatly improve the fee mechanism on #Ethereum | 0 replies 1 retweets 10 likes | |
| 1135941537110601728 2019-06-04 09:09:01 -0700 <RyanSAdams> Excellent article from @hosseeb on crypto transaction fees Worth reading even just to understand the newly proposed Ethereum transaction fee model which may be implemented this year via EIP-1559 https://t.co/VAoQScZIZO | 0 replies 1 retweets 6 likes | |
| 1136272179329425409 2019-06-05 07:02:53 -0700 <nadahalli> This is educational. EIP-1559 is surprisingly elegant. Time to spend more time on https://t.co/cZKiV2OUux. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1136315899676377089 2019-06-05 09:56:36 -0700 <josephjpeters> @tokenstate Transactions aren't a great metric in general. They're not created equal with smart contract platforms. I'm really excited about EIP-1559 since it introduces a new way to manage ETH issuance. ETH is burned with every transaction so as usage goes up, annual issuance gets reduced. | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1136426694724579328 2019-06-05 17:16:52 -0700 <lastmjs> @scott_lew_is Will ETH Gas Station even be needed/necessary once EIP-1559 is implemented? | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1138893178826887168 2019-06-12 12:37:48 -0700 <PhABCD> When will blocks full with front-running transactions by miners frequently out-weight revenue from regular txs? "In 0.5% of all blocks of the Ethereum main chain in Q1 2019 there are txs with a Gas Price of 0." EIP-1559 would help mitigate this problem. https://t.co/7DhGpC49cs | 0 replies 1 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1141110063559581697 2019-06-18 15:26:54 -0700 <lightclients> > Fees spike during periods of high demand, representing a revenue source for the validators but a cost for the users. Apparently this is how the validators will recoup their $10M! It doesn't seem like this system was influenced any by EIP-1559. | 1 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1142087748691615750 2019-06-21 08:11:52 -0700 <TimBeiko> Working group updates now: @AFDudley0 talking about EIP-1559. It's not clear how we can test this, because the current testnets won't work, but we need something bigger than what can run on a single developer setup. Basically, short-lived, public, testnets. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1143676987543867397 2019-06-25 17:26:56 -0700 <josephjpeters> @alexberegszaszi EIP-1559 🥳 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1144043014274240512 2019-06-26 17:41:24 -0700 <sassal0x> ETH is only getting scarcer from here 🚀 -Locked in DeFi -Locked in staking -Locked in DAOs -Lost/frozen (bugs, accidental sends etc) -Lost to slashing/validators going offline -ETH burnt when paying state rent fees -ETH burnt when paying gas fees (EIP-1559) | 36 replies 72 retweets 341 likes | |
| 1146174942276399106 2019-07-02 14:52:55 -0700 <crn_maximizer> @NickSandomeno @spencernoon Gas prices floats. It's not directly tied to price of ETH. There's also EIP 1559 which will make gas prices more predictable while introducing a burn mechanic on each transaction, which further reinforces the SoV property of ether. | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1146211124838313985 2019-07-02 17:16:42 -0700 <NickSandomeno> Two concerns I have about PSoV/SoV (most directly applied to ETH 2.0) that I am looking to solve for: 1. Ability to transcend own eco-system as a SoV 2. Stock to Flow Issue - we can expect ETH consumption (gas fees & burn as per EIP-1559) to rise as a % of "stock"... | 1 replies 1 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1146411589442183168 2019-07-03 06:33:16 -0700 <NickSandomeno> @RyanSAdams Thanks Ryan. I agree tapering issuance will help but I remain concerned about the burn proposed in EIP-1559 which makes any level of issuance (“flows”) larger relative to the circulating supply (“stock”) from the stock-to-flow standpoint. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1146415371135492099 2019-07-03 06:48:18 -0700 <RyanSAdams> @NickSandomeno I see what you're saying now I do not think EIP-1559 will decrease stock significantly at first, if it was implemented today I believe it'd burn something on the order of 10-100k ETH per year Flow from issuance should be close to 1% annual in ETH 2.0, close to Gold | 2 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1146933296556924928 2019-07-04 17:06:21 -0700 <josephjpeters> @VitalikButerin @ck_SNARKs @mysticryuujin Is this EIP-1559 and isn’t it included in the next upgrade this fall? | 0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1147043666042793986 2019-07-05 00:24:55 -0700 <TimBeiko> .@JHancock adds that this ties back to some of the conversation about EIP1559's testing from last AllCoreDevs call. @hudsonjameson said the @ethereum will keep looking into making this happen. https://t.co/Kpu88Bp61h | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1148411230031425537 2019-07-08 18:59:08 -0700 <NickSandomeno> @iamDCinvestor @danheld @sassal0x @IslandHunting @cburniske @Shaughnessy119 @WarcMeinstein @mccannatron @mrjasonchoi @EleniThinks @dgogel @wave_financial @coreyj_miller @danzuller @VisionHill_ @cdixon @skalelabs @gakonst @placeholdervc It doesn’t matter if supply flows are a relatively greater percentage of stock (referencing burn introduced in EIP-1559). | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1148415878008049664 2019-07-08 19:17:36 -0700 <NickSandomeno> @alexgausman @iamDCinvestor @sassal0x @IslandHunting @cburniske @Shaughnessy119 @WarcMeinstein @mccannatron @mrjasonchoi @EleniThinks @dgogel @wave_financial @coreyj_miller @danzuller @VisionHill_ @cdixon @skalelabs @gakonst @placeholdervc That’s what EIP-1559 changes. This is a SoV-supportive change under PoS where ETH will actually be “burned” (destroyed) | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1148973978507104256 2019-07-10 08:15:18 -0700 <Tetranode> @econoar Slow, medium, fast... EIP 1559 pls I'm begging you | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1149295312755970048 2019-07-11 05:32:10 -0700 <scott_lew_is> @cburniske this is essentially correct. same level of security is much cheaper wrt issuance on PoS. if you get scaling, that issuance can be grinded back via fee burning (eip1559) on the torrent of transactions to go to small net positive or small net negative issuance. | 0 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1149341811397185536 2019-07-11 08:36:56 -0700 <TrustlessState> @_Checkmatey_ @BitGo @ck_SNARKs ETH is inflationary on paper, but deflationary in practice. Staking lockup and EIP 1559 engineers ETH to be actively deflationary over time, rather than passively deflationary like BTC. | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1150400230610706432 2019-07-14 06:42:43 -0700 <TrustlessState> @tokenstate Sharding the EVM state rent EIP 1559. The whole gamut | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1150400451508129793 2019-07-14 06:43:35 -0700 <tokenstate> @TrustlessState Paid data storage ~EIP 1559? | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1150403733374681092 2019-07-14 06:56:38 -0700 <TrustlessState> @tokenstate EIP 1559 is algorithmic gas fees. Huge quality of life improvement for gas management, and also burns ETH making it more deflationary and scarce. | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1150755864611033088 2019-07-15 06:15:52 -0700 <scott_lew_is> Ethereum needs to fortify the predictability of the price of ETH within the rules of the protocol. This clown car price action in BTC and ETH is a major drag on almost everything anyone is trying to build. EIP-1559 is the easiest way to do that. | 26 replies 9 retweets 76 likes | |
| 1150759524980183041 2019-07-15 06:30:25 -0700 <PhABCD> @scott_lew_is I'm not sure I understand how EIP-1559 will make ETH price more predictable. Mind sharing your logic? It seems to me that the deflation caused by the amount burnt will have a negligible impact compared to other variables when it comes to ETH's value. | 1 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1150817760903094272 2019-07-15 10:21:50 -0700 <scott_lew_is> @WillSchulz29 @Edward_3210 eip-1559, the fee burner one. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1150825696870248448 2019-07-15 10:53:22 -0700 <trent_vanepps> @CurrencyTycoon @scott_lew_is are you saying the effort is low hanging fruit? designing / speccing and testing EIP 1559 has actually turned to be a significant project.. | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1151112002024214528 2019-07-16 05:51:02 -0700 <PhABCD> @quentinc137 @VitalikButerin @jadler0 @TrustlessState EIP-1559 is meant to help more predictable (in the short/medium term) transaction fees. That being said, as tx cost is based on supply/demand, it's unlikely we will have a way for devs to "guarantee what their smart contracts will cost to run in 1 year". https://t.co/ZoXYSrzqLp | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1151152607483838465 2019-07-16 08:32:23 -0700 <PhABCD> @quentinc137 @VitalikButerin @jadler0 @TrustlessState If you believe raising the limit to 16m gas is what this EIP is about then you misunderstood it. With EIP-1559, the target gas used is 8m gas (same as of today) meaning the BASEFEE will be adjusted such that blocks in average have 8m gas used. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1151170957425483788 2019-07-16 09:45:18 -0700 <PhABCD> @quentinc137 @VitalikButerin @jadler0 @TrustlessState Not a solved problem as I stated in my first reply : 'As tx cost is based on supply/demand, it's unlikely we will have a way for devs to "guarantee what their smart contracts will cost to run in 1 year" ' EIP-1559 makes transaction costs prediction easier on short/medium term. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1151185916821725187 2019-07-16 10:44:45 -0700 <scott_lew_is> @hasufl i think you may have inferred a duality in my perspective that does not exist. not explained in this tweet, but i think anchoring value via mechanisms like eip-1559 (and tx fees to stakers) actually makes moneyness more likely than without it. moneyness is key to a native token. | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1151201612700012544 2019-07-16 11:47:07 -0700 <scott_lew_is> based on my mentions, i can say the bitcoin community is united in not wanting the value of ETH anchored to the growing demand for ETH transactions via EIP-1559. | 4 replies 5 retweets 16 likes | |
| 1151206086399221761 2019-07-16 12:04:54 -0700 <trent_vanepps> @MartyBent @scott_lew_is @MartyBent do you know what EIP 1559 even is? https://t.co/ZttdIoHAu2 | 2 replies 1 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1151405210058838016 2019-07-17 01:16:08 -0700 <BTClovera> @sassal0x Hello @sassal0x what about EIP 1559? is true that you will fixed ETH price's?? | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1151424271627034624 2019-07-17 02:31:53 -0700 <BTClovera> @BtcAndres En cierto mode si, pero a largo plazo esto es irrelevante. Muchos Dev programan en ETH, EIP 1559 ayuda a que las tarifas de transacción sean más predecibles (Corto / mediano plazo) ahora bien, a largo plazo será difícil predecir lo que costará una TX | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1151443770015195136 2019-07-17 03:49:22 -0700 <scott_lew_is> @koeppelmann i need to add tx fees and eip-1559 to mine. just wanted to get the simple version out first. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1151460109765218305 2019-07-17 04:54:17 -0700 <BTClovera> Виталик @VitalikButerin пожалуйста, EIP 1559 это не против децентрализации Цены #ETH??? Цена эфириум не должна быть децентрализаюована ? Спасибо | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1151497954387255298 2019-07-17 07:24:40 -0700 <maqstik> I stumbled upon EIP1559 today -- a proposal to change the fee market in ETH1.0. At @zilliqa, we had a similar idea (which we have implemented) though our motivation was entirely different. It's great to see the same idea being used to solve different problems. https://t.co/cZTd39Rg1A | 3 replies 12 retweets 46 likes | |
| 1151531012456878080 2019-07-17 09:36:02 -0700 <scott_lew_is> @thibm_ @cavernicus @BrianLockhart the long version prolly comes up if you google eip-1559. but the short version is just that a small amount of ETH must be burnt with each transaction. there are some more complex optimizations to try to fix other things, but they are UX related and dont intersect our discussion | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1151822455624699904 2019-07-18 04:54:07 -0700 <sassal0x> @sunnya97 @iamDCinvestor @panekkkk @antiprosynth In addition to baseline fees, there is going to be three other core protocol uses for ETH: -Staking -State rent -Fee burning (EIP-1559) I think a lot of the uses that I outlined in my piece may be replaced with a stablecoin (probably DAI) but, for now, DAI is stable ETH. | 1 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1153689903307190272 2019-07-23 08:34:42 -0700 <econoar> @fubuloubu When I wrote EIP-1559. I wrote a blog about Vitalik's idea first, had many tweet storms and reddit posts (along with discord/telegram). Got feedback, THEN submitted the EIP. | 0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1153719664091860992 2019-07-23 10:32:57 -0700 <econoar> The range is based on how much is staked at any given time and how much is burned each year via eip-1559. https://t.co/msI6a0fuBw | 3 replies 0 retweets 13 likes | |
| 1153727979140370433 2019-07-23 11:06:00 -0700 <josephjpeters> @owocki @econoar @scott_lew_is ETH will be burned when you send a transaction with EIP-1559 I believe so annual issuance should be reduced as usage scales. | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1154411015624417281 2019-07-25 08:20:08 -0700 <josephjpeters> @ck_SNARKs @gadikian @RyanSAdams @TrustlessState As usage increases/decreases on Ethereum, annual issuance will decrease/increase when fees are burned (EIP1559). Factor in PoS where miner revenue is only required to secure the portion of the chain, it's a much more efficient model that is flexible based on market conditions. | 2 replies 1 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1154411584896135170 2019-07-25 08:22:24 -0700 <TrustlessState> EIP 1559 https://t.co/9h38DlODg7 | 1 replies 1 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1154415103250485249 2019-07-25 08:36:23 -0700 <scott_lew_is> @fubuloubu @TrustlessState eip-1559 is a win for miners. i havent prioritized doing a write up, but the economic analysis of the post eip-1559 fee market is flawed. controlling for total throughput, miner fee collection should be nearly identical. and the issuance reduction is 100% win. | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1154840200465436672 2019-07-26 12:45:34 -0700 <harrycanuck> @econoar What happened to EIP 1559? | 2 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1154994089491914752 2019-07-26 22:57:04 -0700 <econoar> @StefanDGeorge @TrustlessState @gnosisSafe Until EIP-1559 :) | 1 replies 0 retweets 6 likes | |
| 1156066875282845696 2019-07-29 21:59:56 -0700 <econoar> @bmann FWIW, because of this, that's how I went about EIP-1559. I studied the idea, tweeted a lot about it, put it on ethresearch, eth-mags and a blog. Waiting a few weeks for feedback then created the EIP. | 2 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1156413915401617408 2019-07-30 20:58:57 -0700 <sassal0x> @alexgausman @NickSandomeno @econoar Burns for ETH would come from EIP-1559 ( https://t.co/v0E91FPUH1), state rent and people being slashed in PoS. Not sure on upper limit or how much ETH will be burned due to these mechanisms but EIP-1559 would ensure a large amount would be. | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1157183863900299265 2019-08-01 23:58:27 -0700 <AFDudley0> @Jihoz_Axie @bmann @realLedgerwatch EIP-1559 was proposed by Vitalik. 😄 | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1157244269058412547 2019-08-02 03:58:28 -0700 <0xTycoon> @kacperwikiel Would be awesome to have EIP-1559 in the next HF or after! Improvements like that not only benefit ETH 1.x but also will follow through to ETH 2.0. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1157302516947832832 2019-08-02 07:49:56 -0700 <TimBeiko> Then, there was a discussion about EIP-1559 ( https://t.co/8jrq0aT4gn). @AFDudley0 and @JHancock shared a report that they have commissioned about the implementation of the EIP ( https://t.co/f3TyZd0ngY). | 1 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1157317465128312837 2019-08-02 08:49:20 -0700 <econoar> An EIP-1559 Implementation Study by @mslipper is out. It has a plan to get the fee market changes into Istanbul. It suggests incentivizating the usage of the new gas pool by making new gas optimized EIPs only available to users of the new pool Thoughts? https://t.co/Xh6bGniShL | 3 replies 4 retweets 15 likes | |
| 1157365624168992769 2019-08-02 12:00:42 -0700 <josephjpeters> @ceterispar1bus @notgrubles Prefer a model where annual issuance is variable based on usage. Look at EIP1559 where ETH is burned with every transaction. This will reduce total issuance as usage (fees) increase. If usage doesn't increase, there's still issuance to pay for validation. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1157369631922937857 2019-08-02 12:16:37 -0700 <NickSandomeno> @econoar @sassal0x Does this take EIP-1559 into account? | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1157401990743433216 2019-08-02 14:25:12 -0700 <CryptoCryptoNe3> EIP-1559 Implementation Study - Feedback appreciated! : ethereum CRYPTO CRYPTO NEWS - https://t.co/1bhFCbfaMS | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1157416593376337920 2019-08-02 15:23:14 -0700 <DomainAddress4u> EIP-1559 Implementation Study - Feedback appreciated! via /r/ethereum https://t.co/3SFa8fsYyr hot 🔥 in #reddit #ethereum #eth #crypto | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1157639802239537152 2019-08-03 06:10:11 -0700 <josephjpeters> @RyanSAdams Technically we will see usage “cap” issuance through burning of ETH. See EIP-1559. There’s a scenario, though unlikely, that net issuance is negative if usage and fees are high enough. | 1 replies 0 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1158454628931067906 2019-08-05 12:08:01 -0700 <EthereumNetw> Week in Ethereum News August 3, 2019 #Ethereum #EIP1559 #ETH2 #lodestar #lighthouse #raiden https://t.co/CV0WqmfDQC | 0 replies 1 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1160407651693539329 2019-08-10 21:28:38 -0700 <AFDudley0> @josephdelong @JonnyRhea @dindjic We can continue with my changes to Vitalik's EIP-1559 I asked Matt Slipper to do the write-up but it's based on my suggestions. https://t.co/PCY9uh6mAV Okay. Your turn? | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1160413126900273152 2019-08-10 21:50:23 -0700 <AFDudley0> @hudsonjameson @josephdelong @JonnyRhea @dindjic You could have that filled with poetry entries, it doesn't say anything about the quality of your code or your contribution to anything. These two are doing a really good job of impressing me with the hiring abilities of @PegaSysEng I'm excited to work with them on EIP-1559 PRs | 2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1160416099101478912 2019-08-10 22:02:12 -0700 <AFDudley0> @hudsonjameson @evertonfraga @josephdelong @JonnyRhea @dindjic @PegaSysEng Yeah, so if EIP-1559 gets implemented. Then @PegaSysEng will be implementing it, which means I'll be working with an organization that employs these people. As I said, I'm excited for the opportunity. | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1161287052928921600 2019-08-13 07:43:03 -0700 <josephjpeters> @TrustlessState @ck_SNARKs @soaltograghy @RyanSAdams The holy grail is adaptive issuance based on usage. This is what EIP1559 is hoping to introduce. Obviously still execution risk, but the theory is strong. It's a tall task for BTC to compete when 21M and PoW is core to the narrative. | 2 replies 0 retweets 8 likes | |
| 1162209257980215302 2019-08-15 20:47:34 -0700 <trent_vanepps> @PelleB I don't think any 1.x proposals aside from EIP 1559 increase throughput, this is going to take some research though I could be mistaken. -state rent -new sync protocols ~ewasm? | 2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1162409376759443456 2019-08-16 10:02:46 -0700 <jemenger> @EthMagicians @metacartel @web3summit @meta_cartel Proposed topics for @Web3Summit on Tuesday 8/20: 👩🔬 Alternateth 👩⚖️ EIP-1559 ⛓️ Interoperability Standards (across chain standards) 🌐 Signaling 💰 Funding of infrastructure projects in a distributed ecosystem | 2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1162421911118155776 2019-08-16 10:52:35 -0700 <JHancock> Who is interested in building EIP-1559 the transaction fee change for Ethereum? Looking for bids for the Geth implementation. Here is the study for reference. https://t.co/eRZTnL3Xpo | 2 replies 8 retweets 23 likes | |
| 1162425399176884225 2019-08-16 11:06:26 -0700 <JHancock> More info EIP-1559, what changes with the fee market for gas, and why we need them. https://t.co/HaS8rQzqcJ | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1162790823852818437 2019-08-17 11:18:30 -0700 <ameensol> Ethereum RFP (because @MolochDAO probably couldn't afford it on our own, oh hey EF) to dev EIP-1559 into Geth. The legendary @mslipper wrote the spec. You can write the code. You can help @ethereum transcend to a new economic reality. You will be amply rewarded 👹💰. | 1 replies 7 retweets 27 likes | |
| 1162811603491774464 2019-08-17 12:41:04 -0700 <kaiynne> @ameensol @MolochDAO @mslipper @ethereum Has anyone written a good counter argument to eip-1559? Assuming this has near universal consensus surely we can coordinate a way to fund this. Do we have any candidates for implementation? | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1163379602065985537 2019-08-19 02:18:06 -0700 <RaymondDurk> When was EIP 1559 rejected? Was the economic arguments against it or did the community want a more thorough analysis of the change? https://t.co/uQD3QpeufO | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1163414771657510912 2019-08-19 04:37:51 -0700 <ThomTwen> The fee market proposed by EIP-1559 adds an element of anticyclical monetary policy to Ethereum. A short thread. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1163934432987930624 2019-08-20 15:02:48 -0700 <josephjpeters> @balajis @TheStalwart It’s projected that by the time ETH2 is at phase 2 (2022), issuance will be around .5% per year compared to BTC at 1.75%. As usage increases, issuance should trend closer to 0 since ETH will be burned with every transaction (see EIP1559). | 6 replies 5 retweets 24 likes | |
| 1164098837822222336 2019-08-21 01:56:05 -0700 <MuteDialog> @SrdanovicPavle @cburniske @ToneVays @jimmysong @giacomozucco Eth will become an increasingly scarce asset with a positive return (after transition to PoS and when minimum burned fees are introduced under EIP1559) | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1164547037234286592 2019-08-22 07:37:04 -0700 <omynuts> @econoar @hudsonjameson Whats the reason for EIP-1559 not being accepted into Istanbul? The ecosystem needs this so bad! | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1164797586487701506 2019-08-23 00:12:40 -0700 <AFDudley0> @edmundedgar @LefterisJP @mhswende @loi_luu A slightly better suggestion might be a mechanism within Istanbul to do this auotmagically unitl EIP-1559 is deployed which puts the gas limit under consensus. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1164798788944289793 2019-08-23 00:17:26 -0700 <AFDudley0> @edmundedgar @LefterisJP @mhswende @loi_luu Have you read EIP-1559? | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1167189377384009728 2019-08-29 14:36:47 -0700 <TimBeiko> @AFDudley0 @econoar @locolocosima @JHancock ... and if you really want to get spicy: having ProgPow and EIP-1559 in the same hardfork would at least unite the entire community behind a single upgrade 😂 | 0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1167520160925790208 2019-08-30 12:31:12 -0700 <econoar> @nicksdjohnson @antiprosynth @EddardZKStark Mainly due to gas market inefficiencies. EIP-1559 can help a lot. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1168706162260201472 2019-09-02 19:03:57 -0700 <dannyryan> @EddardZKStark @benjaminion_xyz @IslandHunting @hudsonjameson @quentinc137 @VitalikButerin EIP 1559 will likely be native to the protocol so validators would have to pay some amount of ETH to burn but could accept fees in whatever they and the market allows | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1168785797706932224 2019-09-03 00:20:23 -0700 <bezantdenier> @notgrubles @TuurDemeester And in addition to this, we have the proposed supply tinkering that is EIP-1559, where parts of ETH transaction fees are actually burned during transactions. It would reduce stock while flow keeps coming. | 1 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1169068469519835143 2019-09-03 19:03:38 -0700 <mhluongo> @ChainLinkGod @alexgausman @keycommando114 @finrekt @ChainlinkLinkie @A55_BLASTER @ChainlinkBull @chainlink @initc3org @bl4ck5unxx @sgoldfed @AriJuels @joeykrug @rleshner @danrobinson @zack_bitcoin @ercwl @RyanSAdams @HeyRhett No, it's like saying "high velocity isn't good for token price". This is an established thing- why subject users to paying with $LINK when it clearly doesn't matter? $ETH has poor economics. Everyone knows, and it's being worked on in EIP-1559 and Eth 2.0. | 2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1169368457026199552 2019-09-04 14:55:40 -0700 <koeppelmann> @nicksdjohnson @PhABCD I think gas tokens played already a positive role in decreasing gas price volatility, see: https://t.co/6SzQIzuo5Q I assume your point is that EIP-1559 would be a much cleaner solution for that? | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1169980396441747456 2019-09-06 07:27:18 -0700 <econoar> @evan_van_ness @koeppelmann @gnosisSafe I think it should always at least be an advanced option. At least until implementations of gas spectrum pricing and/or EIP1559 | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1171464008370511872 2019-09-10 09:42:39 -0700 <econoar> As the Ethereum network remains at full capacity (save us Eth2 🙏), gas prices are moving up. However, given the first price auction mechanism we use, the price moves are wildly inefficient. EIP-1559 can solve this. ICYMI, read more about it here: https://t.co/0HvAKopGBI | 5 replies 20 retweets 89 likes | |
| 1171464030642298887 2019-09-10 09:42:44 -0700 <ADSaturnino> As the Saturn network remains at full capacity (save us Eth2 🙏), gas prices are moving up. However, given the first price auction mechanism we use, the price moves are wildly inefficient. EIP-1559 can solve this. ICYMI, read more about it here: https://t.co/kxWB9ZD5ur | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1171473799897698308 2019-09-10 10:21:33 -0700 <spencernoon> Ethereum's fee market can be optimized (EIP-1559) but don't forget that ETH *already* has a working fee market. Don't fall for concern trolling about "another Cryptokitties situation”—dynamic fees are an unavoidable and healthy consequence of permissionless resource provisioning. | 1 replies 7 retweets 32 likes | |
| 1171478609552232448 2019-09-10 10:40:40 -0700 <cyber_hokie> @NukeManDan @RyanSAdams Agreed, the mechanism for optimizing gas price is flawed which is why eip-1559 is so needed. But it’s still not a function of ETH price itself. Overpayment is a function of the fee market participants and the way gas price scales. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1171517900676456455 2019-09-10 13:16:47 -0700 <econoar> The EIP-1559 working group is looking for help and feedback. Check out this post and see if you can help improve the way Ethereum handles the gas market! https://t.co/AhKh4gUpjO | 0 replies 3 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1171517923543793664 2019-09-10 13:16:53 -0700 <ADSaturnino> The EIP-1559 working group is looking for help and feedback. Check out this post and see if you can help improve the way Saturn handles the gas market! https://t.co/OQix4UBIXn | 0 replies 1 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1172493131268280320 2019-09-13 05:52:01 -0700 <econoar> @koeppelmann It’s extremely frustrating how inefficient the gas market pricing is though. We didn’t just see 20x increase in demand. Save us EIP-1559. | 2 replies 0 retweets 20 likes | |
| 1172493998646337538 2019-09-13 05:55:27 -0700 <koeppelmann> @econoar I am supportive of EIP-1559 and predictable gas prices with little volatility SHOULD be a goal. That being said - even under EIP-1559, a 2x increase in demand can still result in a 20x increase in price. | 2 replies 0 retweets 7 likes | |
| 1172494255073505280 2019-09-13 05:56:28 -0700 <koeppelmann> @econoar This is because supply is basically fixed and additional demand can be only addressed by outpricing previous demand. With EIP-1559 supply can just be increased short-term, not long term. | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1172494861402030080 2019-09-13 05:58:53 -0700 <koeppelmann> @hasufl @econoar EIP 1559 also introduces short term flexible supply - but your argument still holds longer term. | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1173068038372917248 2019-09-14 19:56:29 -0700 <edmundedgar> @ArthurB @nic__carter @spencernoon Or not full most of the time, but have a less dysfunctional fee system like EIP1559 | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1173373716291575808 2019-09-15 16:11:08 -0700 <trent_vanepps> @NepalBlockchain @RyanSAdams ryan wasn't asking whether it was designed to be. but whether people use it as money looking forward to EIP 1559 as well! | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1173986377223958528 2019-09-17 08:45:38 -0700 <econoar> @UncleZachh @loomdart @sassal0x @coinmetrics Well, we'll gain 1024 the throughput so capacity can increase. So it'll go up, how much depends on demand. Then fees will be burned on the network level (assuming eip-1559 gets implemented into eth2) | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1173986548305387520 2019-09-17 08:46:19 -0700 <econoar> @davidiach @loomdart @sassal0x @coinmetrics It sounds like eip-1559 will by default be in eth2 so they will actually be burned (minus any "tips" over the basefee). | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1173988837787222016 2019-09-17 08:55:25 -0700 <econoar> A reminder that in addition to fixing the inefficient gas market, EIP-1559 will introduce a burn mechanism for network fees. Yesterday, 1009 ETH were spent on tx fees. That would be 370,000 ETH (0.35% of supply) a year burnt. This will be in Eth2 by default. | 13 replies 49 retweets 194 likes | |
| 1173988859786518529 2019-09-17 08:55:30 -0700 <ADSaturnino> A reminder that in addition to fixing the inefficient gas market, EIP-1559 will introduce a burn mechanism for network fees. Yesterday, 1009 SATURN were spent on tx fees. That would be 370,000 SATURN (0.35% of supply) a year burnt. This will be in Eth2 by default. | 0 replies 1 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1173999361493258240 2019-09-17 09:37:14 -0700 <ajlopez> Fixing the Ethereum Fee Market (EIP-1559) https://t.co/iosgnPEUx9 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1174040653413736449 2019-09-17 12:21:19 -0700 <Crypto_Patoruzu> Además de arreglar el ineficiente mercado del gas, EIP-1559 introducirá un mecanismo de quema de ETH en costos por uso de la red. Ayer se gastaron 1009 ETH en costos de tx. Eso equivale a 370.000 ETH (0.35% del suministro) al año quemado. Esto estará en Eth2 por defecto. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1174117148270178304 2019-09-17 17:25:16 -0700 <EthfinanceR> Of EIP-1559 and burning fees via /r/ethfinance https://t.co/N1y0BZa9sU $ETH #Ethereum #EthFinance | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1174117190406213632 2019-09-17 17:25:26 -0700 <bitcoinagile> r/ethfinance - Of EIP-1559 and burning fees #Ethereum #EthFinance $ETH https://t.co/OEduKOrPS6 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1174296697196793857 2019-09-18 05:18:44 -0700 <0xTycoon> @crypto_fruit @sassal0x Just like gas is burned in the car's engine, so will ETH be burned when a smart contract is run. 😏 But in all seriousness, EIP-1559 is a step in tackling "Economic abstraction", as critiqued in the following article https://t.co/mbHs2ETwjt | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1174494400614936576 2019-09-18 18:24:20 -0700 <jadler0> @trent_vanepps @phildaian I remember that paper, but it deals with gas pricing and fee auctions, not gas auctions 😂 Auctions for transaction fees are going in a good direction (EIP-1559 championed by @econoar), but I don't see anything for auctions for opcode pricing. | 1 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1174537744900485120 2019-09-18 21:16:34 -0700 <0xTycoon> @scupytrooples The #Ethereum metropolis just added an extra lane 😏 https://t.co/DDDAdioE7X Agree on the fee UX, it can be improved! Here is a proposal to improve it for the next 2 years! (EIP-1559): https://t.co/AApgJoMpxc | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1175065079814877185 2019-09-20 08:12:01 -0700 <TrustlessState> @EdgarAronov @RyanSAdams With EIP 1559, we get larger and larger portions of ETH burn. This protects non-stakers against inflation and exposes non-stakers to the upside of Ethereum growth. It's a great mechanism for fairness | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1175095073635098624 2019-09-20 10:11:12 -0700 <TrustlessState> .@RyanSAdams was invaluable accurately conceptualize Ether as the triple-point asset, especially with regards to the consumable/transformable asset class. I got help from @econoar understanding EIP 1559 and integrating that into the triple-point thesis too. | 2 replies 1 retweets 9 likes | |
| 1175143069705891841 2019-09-20 13:21:55 -0700 <TrustlessState> @jdorman81 @iDecentralized This is where EIP 1559 Comes in, and why I added a qualifier about it at the start of the article. https://t.co/d5JJP8gffj With EIP 1559, the majority of gas IS burned | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1175148528219197440 2019-09-20 13:43:36 -0700 <TrustlessState> @benthecarman @StopAndDecrypt That's an unproven thesis. Not much difference between .5% inflation and 0% inflation. Especially when Ether is constantly being removed from supply by EIP 1559 and DeFi applications. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1175207157723103237 2019-09-20 17:36:35 -0700 <0xTycoon> @cyber_hokie @hudsonjameson @ameensol Which means that if it does come to an actual chain split, we could see totally different results than the vote implied. Anyway, can we forget about progpow and have EIP-1559 please? 😀 | 1 replies 0 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1175473503643979776 2019-09-21 11:14:57 -0700 <TrustlessState> @kacperwikiel @gphummer @scupytrooples @econoar @IslandHunting EIP 1559 | 0 replies 0 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1175554691343642626 2019-09-21 16:37:33 -0700 <0xTycoon> @u_Peng_Fei Thanks! It's good too keep abreast. Lastly, do you know if there any awareness about EIP-1559 (to fix the gas market)? If so, is there any support or opposition? | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1175556985779097606 2019-09-21 16:46:40 -0700 <u_Peng_Fei> @CurrencyTycoon If I understand correctly, EIP-1559 was rejected for the Instabul hardfork? But not sure of the reasoning. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1175560697670823937 2019-09-21 17:01:25 -0700 <0xTycoon> @u_Peng_Fei I was hoping that you'd have more insight. I guess everyone is obsessed around the progpow debate, so good stuff like EIP-1559 gets ignored. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1175718629817630721 2019-09-22 03:28:59 -0700 <drakefjustin> @terencechain @econoar @ethhub_io The logic behind EIP1559 which allows transaction load spikes to be absorbed by the system, leading to less volatile gas markets and smoother UX. | 0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1175734781348405253 2019-09-22 04:33:10 -0700 <tze42> @econoar we have just discussed the EIP1559, which was obviously not integrated into 'Istanbul'. What is the best place to see / hear about the reason for this decision or was it just too late for a proper discussion about it? | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1176141206859812865 2019-09-23 07:28:10 -0700 <0xTycoon> @K_mpec80 @ETHGasStation It's a ponzi scheme that seems to be quite popular in China, fairwin .me (remove the space). See the "Rule" at the top of the page for how it works (but don't play, of course) Anyhow, this is why we need EIP-1559. Many fairwin tx's specify a small gwei price, despite congestion. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1176278922255712257 2019-09-23 16:35:23 -0700 <jemenger> @econoar @kacperwikiel @JHancock @AFDudley0 And there is a recent "working group brief" for EIP-1559, described in this FEM Forum comment. https://t.co/46aQT5s0Pj | 1 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1176487732442480640 2019-09-24 06:25:08 -0700 <TrustlessState> Already chewing on my next article. I love writing so much 🤗. This one is going in @RyanSAdams's Bankless, so sign up for early access to the content! This article is all about @econoar's EIP 1559, and its improvements to Ethereum's monetary policy. Here's a teaser: https://t.co/ReLAAUFyDQ | 2 replies 9 retweets 46 likes | |
| 1176594473507328001 2019-09-24 13:29:17 -0700 <econoar> @gregthegreek EIP-1559 can solve a lot of this. We don't actually have 80x the demand. It's just people not knowing what others will pay so they jack up their prices to get in. | 3 replies 0 retweets 9 likes | |
| 1176624694998360064 2019-09-24 15:29:22 -0700 <mark_stobie> @econoar @gregthegreek Why did EIP-1559 have no champion? It could be the best effort to reward improvement for right now. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1176651444885147648 2019-09-24 17:15:40 -0700 <econoar> Over the past week, fees on Ethereum have been ~1400 ETH/day. Once both EIP-1559 and PoS are implemented, at 10mn total stake, the network would be issuing ~1550 ETH/day and burning ~1400 ETH/day. So, the network would be operating securely at near 0 issuance. | 13 replies 45 retweets 144 likes | |
| 1176653395312046081 2019-09-24 17:23:25 -0700 <VitalikButerin> @econoar Issuing 1550 seems high; remember that if x% of validator's go offline total rewards go down by ~3x %. Though OTOH EIP 1559 does not burn *all* the fees. Still, interesting to know that issuance neutrality is not that far away! | 2 replies 4 retweets 74 likes | |
| 1176655720067956736 2019-09-24 17:32:39 -0700 <TrustlessState> @hasufl @econoar Having both block rewards and transaction fees is like doing an ICO for a blockchain with on-chain dev fund. You only get one. EIP 1559 says validators get block rewards. They can also accept bribes for allowing people to cut the line. But transaction fees go to Ethereum | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1176657008054767616 2019-09-24 17:37:46 -0700 <0xTycoon> @econoar EIP-1559 also fixes the UX by allowing wallets to be more predictable with estimating the gas fee. Right now, specifying a low price is like shooting in the dark. Eliminates the "WhY iS mY CAT nOt bREEDING! WALLET SAID 30m, ITS BEEN 4h NOW!" 😀 | 0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1176660726158483456 2019-09-24 17:52:33 -0700 <0xTycoon> Having a more predictable and stable gas market would not only benefit the user, but also help service providers budget their gas expenses, as it can get tricky. This is your friendly reminder that EIP-1559 can help! See what's it all about here https://t.co/AApgJoMpxc | 0 replies 1 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1176692076064305152 2019-09-24 19:57:07 -0700 <econoar> @BenDiFrancesco @TrustlessState @VitalikButerin @josephjpeters @hasufl This changes a bit in the PoS implementation I guess. EIP-1559 2.0. 😂 | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1176720466964123648 2019-09-24 21:49:56 -0700 <econoar> I won’t be stepping down as “Chief ETH is Money Meme Officer” over EIP-1559. | 2 replies 2 retweets 23 likes | |
| 1176956171795619841 2019-09-25 13:26:32 -0700 <econoar> @josephjpeters Ya I want to start trying to model the eth2 fee market. It's very complex. Yes we add capacity but I expect some shards to crowd and they will have more competitive markets than other. Also eip-1559 in eth2 targets a block size (1/4th I heard) so that's a factor too. | 1 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1177118563318083584 2019-09-26 00:11:49 -0700 <lab10collective> @econoar @josephjpeters When do you expect the integration of EIP1559? The next HF? | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1177412604924268544 2019-09-26 19:40:14 -0700 <0xTycoon> @ethhub_io @iamDCinvestor Thanks! Already found a nice gem (discussing the problem that EIP-1559 aims to address) https://t.co/NQ6N18RLbx | 1 replies 1 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1178627102695837697 2019-09-30 04:06:13 -0700 <0xTycoon> @DegenSpartan Nice..😁 most will be lucky to stack 32. Anyway, from the scarceity angle, the best thing is that a form of EIP-1559 will be on by default in ETH 2.0, thus thousands of ETH will be burning daily. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1178677347987394566 2019-09-30 07:25:53 -0700 <trent_vanepps> @o_rourke inflation as in EOS to accomodate "fee-less" txs only obfuscates it to the end user. a main feature of crypto is auditability and transparency, hidden inflation to block producers is a step backwards. EIP 1559 will add a burn mechanism to ETH1 / ETH2 fee markets. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1179590290685870080 2019-10-02 19:53:35 -0700 <0xTycoon> @CryptoEcon_Li @TrustlessState True.. and with staking and a variation of EIP-1559 in by default, ETH will be an even stronger value capture token! Can you believe it's only ~4 months to staking? Can't wait! 🥳 | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1180121167681740800 2019-10-04 07:03:06 -0700 <NickSandomeno> @alexgausman @zackvoell Definitely have to be a little creative with the application. I actually think it’s pretty straightforward for ethereum w/ EIP-1559’s proposed burn. For Bitcoin I think the UTXO set enables a holistic differentiation of what coins are being used for what purposes. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1180154970760515584 2019-10-04 09:17:25 -0700 <TimBeiko> @jemenger @EthCatHerders State Rent. EIP-1559 (fee market). A new fast/warp sync protocol. EIP-1862 (fixed HF dates). | 0 replies 0 retweets 6 likes | |
| 1180245143518994432 2019-10-04 15:15:44 -0700 <poapxyz> @jemenger @EthCatHerders EIP-1559 | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1181431129490022400 2019-10-07 21:48:25 -0700 <smpalladino> @VitalikButerin going through EIP1559 on setting a base network fee for all txs. This is aimed at improving the gas price marketplace, where users typically overpay. Thi yields a better user experience, where users will have greater assurance of when their tx will be mined. https://t.co/mAQwE8AblL | 1 replies 1 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1181460794774392832 2019-10-07 23:46:18 -0700 <masaoyana> ちょっと長い文章だけど、Ethereum2.0、EIP1559を前提にプラットフォームとしてのEthereumとETHの資産性についての考察 資産性についてサクッとまとめるとETHは ・Capital Asset ・Comsumable Asset ・SoV Asset の３つ全てを満たす資産であると https://t.co/zFYNVIHG3s https://t.co/ypOVo1Xc5b | 1 replies 11 retweets 30 likes | |
| 1181755537664303104 2019-10-08 19:17:30 -0700 <nakajo> eip-1559はむずかしいのよね。。。。 #efdevcon #devcon #devcon5 | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1181757759005446144 2019-10-08 19:26:20 -0700 <nakajo> EIP-1559 は2020年に実装予定。 eth1.0はまだまだ動きつづけないといけないからねぇ。 #efdevcon #devcon #devcon5 | 0 replies 2 retweets 6 likes | |
| 1181759076855771136 2019-10-08 19:31:34 -0700 <cryptoecongames> Interesting new working groups: Finality gadget EIP 1559 https://t.co/HQY4k131fS | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1181760205492604930 2019-10-08 19:36:03 -0700 <bokujyuumai> ProPoWとかに時間割くよりイスタンブールでEIP-1559実装してほしかったです。 イーサリアム2.0の重要性と優先度はわかりますが、レガシーチェーンの後回し具合なんとかしてほしいところ #イーサリアム #Ethereum #仮想通貨 | 1 replies 2 retweets 16 likes | |
| 1181782852825841664 2019-10-08 21:06:03 -0700 <bokujyuumai> EIP-1559の必要性と現在のガスモデルがなぜ問題があるかはサロンにて詳しく解説しています https://t.co/uabAva5Jhe #イーサリアム #Ethereum #仮想通貨 | 0 replies 1 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1181974876376055809 2019-10-09 09:49:05 -0700 <iDecentralized> @TrustlessState @RyanSAdams We need to start a @econoar fund once EIP 1559 goes live, he will have helped make all ETH hodlers incredibly wealthy. | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1182123878698475520 2019-10-09 19:41:10 -0700 <VitalikButerin> @KyleSamani EIP 1559 should make disruptions from spamming lower. Tx fees would still go up from a spam attack, but it would not be a crazy chaotic thing where you have no idea how much you need to pay to get included. | 0 replies 1 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1182177769268142080 2019-10-09 23:15:18 -0700 <romain_rouphael> "From a user’s point of view, ethereum would “feel” the same pre- and post-transition (except that it would feel smoother due to PoS and EIP 1559). Very different code paths would be used to package and broadcast the transaction, but the functionality provided would be the same" | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1182310851832946690 2019-10-10 08:04:08 -0700 <RyanSAdams> New release: The Final Puzzle Piece to ETH’s Monetary Policy Long-awaited article @TrustlessState has been teasing See how EIP-1559 cements ETH as a reserve asset making the best model for money we've seen h/t @VitalikButerin & @econoar for EIP https://t.co/4AaR3tpZRQ | 7 replies 40 retweets 123 likes | |
| 1182312387136778241 2019-10-10 08:10:14 -0700 <TrustlessState> EIP 1559 is the next big thing to happen to Ethereum. I write about its significance and impact to Ethereum's monetary policy in @RyanSAdams' latest edition of #bankless! Get your learn on! #ETHismoney | 3 replies 10 retweets 50 likes | |
| 1182328308316459008 2019-10-10 09:13:29 -0700 <tokenstate> EIP-1559 would give tremendous utility to ETH, creating a better SOV than anything we've seen yet in Crypto. Every micro-transaction would burn supply. ETH could start to have supply reductions if demand is very high. | 0 replies 0 retweets 15 likes | |
| 1182416539590377472 2019-10-10 15:04:05 -0700 <ChainLinkGod> Great article on EIP 1559, a revamp of the fee system that improves UX and features an $ETH burn mechanism that bolsters Ethereum's monetary policy https://t.co/iNGAHrvcqR The only thing missing from that second infographic is the $LINK between Web2 and Web3 ;) https://t.co/RtoYGaSOew | 0 replies 5 retweets 17 likes | |
| 1182452089399607296 2019-10-10 17:25:21 -0700 <masaoyana> David Hoffman @TrustlessState によるEIP1559の解説 なぜEIP 1559 is the last piece of Ethereum’s economic systemなのかが述べられています↓ https://t.co/yoHjqcMoJF | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1182522822993670144 2019-10-10 22:06:25 -0700 <santiagoroel> EIP 1559 is a very interesting proposal by @econoar. Creates a base rate for gas, keeps ETH inflation rate in check by burning the majority of the ETH in the tx fee. Tips can be added on top of the base fee to expedite txs. More network usage = higher base fee = more burn ⛽️ | 0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1182707344117043200 2019-10-11 10:19:39 -0700 <RyanSAdams> Bankless Weekly Actions Recap: - Execute market opportunities - Stake ETH in @Rocket_Pool test - Learn first 7 metrics in the @coinmetrics table - Consider: effect of EIP 1559 on moneyness of ETH? Subscribe as an Early Believer before slots run out! https://t.co/vWv6KL4UYZ | 0 replies 6 retweets 21 likes | |
| 1182754159705149445 2019-10-11 13:25:40 -0700 <Greaves1704> @TrustlessState @RyanSAdams @VitalikButerin @econoar @preston_vanloon @ralexstokes I’m a total noob & I support EIP-1559 because of its deflationary nature. However, if ETH 1.0 can do 1.3M tx per day, if we have 1000 shards, wouldn’t it be 1.3B tx per day capacity? Someone can correct me. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1183834836047298560 2019-10-14 12:59:54 -0700 <iDecentralized> @ethAur44 Digital Ownership made sense before fees were burnt ala EIP 1559, but we still will get those "tips" lol | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1183871595908976640 2019-10-14 15:25:58 -0700 <POVCryptoPod> Dream podcast episode: @RyanSAdams @econoar @VitalikButerin All discuss how Ethereum is emergently replicating a traditional fiat economic platform, but this time: - code instead of humans - crypto instead of fiat Specifically focusing on EIP1559 as the latest development | 1 replies 5 retweets 21 likes | |
| 1184126224479739904 2019-10-15 08:17:46 -0700 <DoubleNSC> @ck_SNARKs @TrustlessState When growth of the Ethereum ecosystem / economy is > new liquid supply it will moon PoS, EIP-1559, lockup for collateral / L2 - reduces liquid supply DeFi, dApps, token usage - increases demand BTC only addresses one side of this equation (+ security uncertainty) Good luck! | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1184209396311744512 2019-10-15 13:48:16 -0700 <Abv_Avg_Joe> @ck_SNARKs If there is seigniorage and ethereum is distributed evenly amongst everyone with the introduction of EIP 1559 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1185888007209009154 2019-10-20 04:58:28 -0700 <blackscale_> @CryptoADavid @antiprosynth While I agree that EIP1559 could be groundbreaking, I have not seen it on the roadmap at all. There seems to be a misunderstanding or at least a good deal of wishful thinking in that article. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1186243477761417216 2019-10-21 04:30:59 -0700 <AlexanderFisher> I'm excited as we get closer to implementing #Ethereum EIP-1559 - burning ETH with each transaction, improving UX, and cementing $ETH economic value. Read: Fixing the Ethereum Fee Market (EIP-1559) https://t.co/KtjSZUJNkx #bitcoin #cryptocurrency https://t.co/EAbMhec10r | 4 replies 17 retweets 52 likes | |
| 1186251512965668866 2019-10-21 05:02:54 -0700 <Ethereum_France> La Semaine d’Ethereum, édition du 20 octobre ‘19 - calme post-devcon avec : - Dai Card - transfert de DAI gratuit sur layer 2 - la politique monétaire ETH décryptée - EIP 1559 : faut-il brûler du gas ? - une appli pour perdre du poids https://t.co/bGASVtT4ZI cc @evan_van_ness | 0 replies 4 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1186270787558240256 2019-10-21 06:19:30 -0700 <0xTycoon> Ethereum needs this EIP badly! It fixes two issues: 1. Improving the UX by having a more predictable gas market. 2. Combats the "economic abstraction" problem by ensuring that gas fees are always paid in cold, hard, $ETH (which gets burned btw! yay!) Support EIP-1559 today! | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1186304370205442054 2019-10-21 08:32:56 -0700 <PhABCD> @spencernoon I don't think EIP-1559 will be part of Istanbul, unless something changed in the last 2-3 weeks. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1186329654614867970 2019-10-21 10:13:25 -0700 <TrustlessState> I just published EIP 1559: The Final Puzzle-Piece to Ethereum’s Monetary Policy https://t.co/5UaPch8wQR EIP 1559 is the final component to Ethereum’s economic system. It solves UX issues with gas management... but it does so much more… 👇🏼Thread👇🏼 | 4 replies 35 retweets 119 likes | |
| 1186329655617310721 2019-10-21 10:13:25 -0700 <TrustlessState> 1/ EIP 1559, introduced by @econoar, is meant to provide wallets and users a much needed improvement to the user-experience of gas management. Knowing how much to spend on gas in order to pay for a transaction is a UX issue that plagues Ethereum and crypto at-large. | 1 replies 0 retweets 7 likes | |
| 1186329656477138948 2019-10-21 10:13:25 -0700 <TrustlessState> 2/ However, EIP 1559 is much bigger than that. The way that EIP 1559 solves the gas-management problem also improves Ethereum’s monetary management system. | 1 replies 0 retweets 8 likes | |
| 1186329657295028227 2019-10-21 10:13:25 -0700 <TrustlessState> 3/ EIP 1559 does two main things: - Establishes “the market rate” Tx fee for block-inclusion This is called 'BASEFEE' - Transactions burn BASEFEE in order to be included in blocks This change to Ethereum’s gas management has significant implications Ethereum's monetary system | 2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes | |
| 1186329666795081728 2019-10-21 10:13:28 -0700 <TrustlessState> 14/ By adding to the scarcity of Ethereum today, Ethereum’s security tomorrow is secured. EIP 1559 puts constant downwards pressure on the supply of ETH. When Ethereum has 1024x shards, then 1024x the amount of ETH will be burned, if chain congestion holds equal. | 1 replies 0 retweets 6 likes | |
| 1186329672176431106 2019-10-21 10:13:29 -0700 <TrustlessState> 15/ EIP 1559 reduces the issuance of ETH. Depending on network congestion, 1559 could burn more ETH than what is issued, reducing inflation to 0 or lower. While more data and modeling is needed, EIP 1559 could effectively kill net ETH issuance. https://t.co/U6T0P05XpQ | 1 replies 0 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1186329673661202434 2019-10-21 10:13:29 -0700 <TrustlessState> While this thread represents the bulk of the article, and its substance, I encourage you to read it in its entirety. There much more said in the full article, such as the new metrics that EIP 1559 brings: - The ETH Burn Rate - ETH Issue/Burn Ratio Check it out! | 1 replies 0 retweets 7 likes | |
| 1186332872564559874 2019-10-21 10:26:12 -0700 <MyCrypto> master thread on eip 1559 🔥 | 0 replies 2 retweets 9 likes | |
| 1186347581649149953 2019-10-21 11:24:39 -0700 <EthfinanceR> EIP 1559: The Final Puzzle-Piece to Ethereum’s Monetary Policy via /r/ethfinance https://t.co/n0kRDIcE4G $ETH #Ethereum #EthFinance | 0 replies 1 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1186353052816687107 2019-10-21 11:46:23 -0700 <scott_lew_is> just like gold's value is secured by its aesthetic beauty, and the dollar's value is secured by the need to pay federal taxes in it, ether's value is secured by the need to have it to use ethereum, but only after eip-1559 is implemented. | 2 replies 5 retweets 17 likes | |
| 1186374797950947329 2019-10-21 13:12:48 -0700 <scott_lew_is> @syfengxamn 1. right now => fee preference on ethereum. 2. right now => biggest network of transacters on ethereum 3. hopefully soon => you need to burn some to do it any transaction w/ eip-1559. 4. hopefully down the road => needed to collect tx fees above eip-1559 and staking rewards. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1186377471270309888 2019-10-21 13:23:25 -0700 <veliko_test3> “EIP 1559: The Final Puzzle-Piece to Ethereum’s Monetary Policy” by David Hoffman https://t.co/eP7lzITTsM | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1186383219161219072 2019-10-21 13:46:16 -0700 <DomainAddress4u> “EIP 1559: The Final Puzzle-Piece to Ethereum’s Monetary Policy” by David Hoffman via /r/ethereum https://t.co/2Zykdtgj2v hot 🔥 in #reddit #ethereum #eth #crypto | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1186417289073233920 2019-10-21 16:01:38 -0700 <r_Ethereum> “EIP 1559: The Final Puzzle-Piece to Ethereum’s Monetary Policy” by David Hoffman #Ethereum https://t.co/q3GYALD1gg | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1186446324847169536 2019-10-21 17:57:01 -0700 <CCassets> 最近話題のEIP1559 たぶんEth2.0になってから採用されると思うんだけど、 TXfeeをネットワーク使用率（50%が閾値（仮））に応じてベースfeeを上下させる。手数料一律化モデル。 | 1 replies 2 retweets 9 likes | |
| 1186449691942146048 2019-10-21 18:10:24 -0700 <CCassets> ネットワーク経済の活性度によって、ETHの価値が上下する構造となる。（供給調節が機能する。） ざっくりした計算だと、EIP1559が導入されるとfeeは今の1/10~1/50程度が標準になる試算。 Eth2.0でのtpsは今の200~500倍という試算。 興味深い経済機構になる。 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1186461374056153088 2019-10-21 18:56:49 -0700 <Crypto_Patoruzu> @JHancock @antiprosynth And wait for just for EIP-1559. When the sum of #DeFi transactions and tx fees burning start causing deflation #ETH Just buy @ETH man... 🤑 (NFA) | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1186501651110268929 2019-10-21 21:36:52 -0700 <FlyGuyInTheSky> Well now you know it #EIP1559 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1186504067448823808 2019-10-21 21:46:28 -0700 <CleanApp> @TrustlessState Irrespective of the merits of EIP 1559, the rhetoric in these slides totally undermines the cause. https://t.co/Ke6aBRw4tV | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1186518996612505600 2019-10-21 22:45:47 -0700 <Obionecoinobi> @hudsonjameson Ethfinance should have a say in the ethereum ecosystem, it seems that the people involved in this reddit group like to ask more questions than shout moon/lambi look to the eip 1559 discussion for reference, just my two gwei | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1186728048143589381 2019-10-22 12:36:29 -0700 <willmorriss4> @TrustlessState Fixing prices is different from using the market rate. The market rate is the rate at which supply equals demand. A fixed rate results in a shortage or a surplus. EIP1559 cannot react to rapid changes in congestion; airdrop spam would be crippling. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1186769479201673217 2019-10-22 15:21:07 -0700 <trent_vanepps> @nlebowitz1 The Ethereum community is actually moving towards doing just this: and adaptive blocksize that also smooths out fee markets. See EIP 1559 https://t.co/ZttdIoHAu2 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1186811476641746945 2019-10-22 18:08:00 -0700 <EthereumNetw> EIP 1559 is the final component to #Ethereum’s economic system. It solves the UX surrounding gas management, but it does so much more… @RyanSAdams https://t.co/P3393vZ11s | 1 replies 5 retweets 15 likes | |
| 1186835902120677376 2019-10-22 19:45:04 -0700 <HashHubResearch> 本日d10n LabのレポートではEIP1559の概要と考察を配信しました。 EIP1559はETHのトランザクション手数料モデル変更とETHの価値を長期的に上昇し続けることに繋がる提案です。 最近注目されている提案で手数料計算モデルとしてだけｓでなく投資家視点でも非常に大きい提案です。 | 0 replies 0 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1186836612530855937 2019-10-22 19:47:53 -0700 <junbhirano> EIP1559の解説。Ethereumのネットワークにおける手数料の考え方が変わる大きい提案です。 | 0 replies 0 retweets 10 likes | |
| 1186888029090152448 2019-10-22 23:12:12 -0700 <HashHubResearch> 今週d10n Labで配信したレポート一覧です。 FTXのレバレッジトークンの設計は取引所の商品設計としても面白いです。他EIP1559の解説や電力系コンソーシアムチェーンなど。 https://t.co/Po7dVIdqPR https://t.co/05LWG2243B | 0 replies 1 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1186948209265934336 2019-10-23 03:11:20 -0700 <HashHubResearch> EIP1559の概要。ETHのトランザクション手数料の計算モデル変更とETHの価値を長期的に上昇し続けることに繋がる提案。 https://t.co/Xfio3HOjGI | 0 replies 1 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1186951950559936513 2019-10-23 03:26:12 -0700 <shingen_crypto> EIP1559は熱いですね。 確かにMinerやValidatorにFeeを配るより、全体の価値を底上げして開発者含めて関係者へ報いる方がより良い形といえるかも。 | 0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1187029439349084165 2019-10-23 08:34:06 -0700 <TrustlessState> EIP 1559: The a Final Puzzle-Piece to Ethereum’s Monetary Policy https://t.co/5UaPch8wQR | 1 replies 3 retweets 10 likes | |
| 1187118136924856320 2019-10-23 14:26:34 -0700 <econoar> It looks like I missed a lot of good discussion around EIP-1559 mainly led by @TrustlessState and @RyanSAdams. Just to be clear, the plan is indeed to have this in by default in eth2. Also here is my original quick explainer article about it. https://t.co/0HvAKopGBI | 6 replies 11 retweets 63 likes | |
| 1187118664794984454 2019-10-23 14:28:39 -0700 <AndrewDARMACAP> @econoar @TrustlessState @RyanSAdams I’m all for EIP 1559! | 0 replies 1 retweets 10 likes | |
| 1187194503330877441 2019-10-23 19:30:01 -0700 <aomra_00> ETHの手数料がバーンされる提案ていいなぁ。 いっぱい燃えないかなぁ笑 #EIP1559 | 0 replies 0 retweets 7 likes | |
| 1187246185670742016 2019-10-23 22:55:23 -0700 <EthereumNetw> Check out this thread to learn all about EIP 1559, how it improves UX and solidifies ETH’s monetary policy by burning part of the transaction fees. By @econoar and @TrustlessState | 0 replies 4 retweets 8 likes | |
| 1187291564437057537 2019-10-24 01:55:42 -0700 <martinkrung> Lets do this, go EIP 1559, go! | 0 replies 1 retweets 10 likes | |
| 1187316923853393920 2019-10-24 03:36:28 -0700 <AFDudley0> @koeppelmann @edmundedgar @econoar @TrustlessState @RyanSAdams If we have an issue with opcode costs, we will need to hard fork much faster than we did previously, since dapp devs probably won't have the ability to mitigate. I wanted to have someone simulate some of these conditions, I hope that still happens. EIP-1559 is a huge change. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1187402967743221760 2019-10-24 09:18:23 -0700 <econoar> It seems there are a few open (and good) questions people have around EIP-1559, especially around the “tip” that goes to miners. I’ll work on an FAQ article next week to clear up any confusion. | 2 replies 3 retweets 13 likes | |
| 1187406803811717120 2019-10-24 09:33:37 -0700 <econoar> Dapp UX has improved so much. Most DeFi apps feel easier than CeFi. The issue with UX for adoption is much deeper. Gas pricing, WETH, confusing addresses, seed phrases and more... The good news is most of these have solutions coming. EIP-1559, ENS and smart contract wallets. | 3 replies 11 retweets 97 likes | |
| 1187409577899253762 2019-10-24 09:44:39 -0700 <SavantSpecter> @econoar Is there thought around what total miner compensation will be with EIP1559? Aka what the sum of total tips will be on the network? | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1187478932737515520 2019-10-24 14:20:14 -0700 <TrustlessState> The cool thing about Ethereum’s monetary policy: With EIP 1559, ‘necessary issuance’ can actually be negative. | 2 replies 4 retweets 27 likes | |
| 1187521399218491392 2019-10-24 17:08:59 -0700 <CryptoADavid> @RyanSAdams This is awesome. Between EIP 1559 + Monetary policy + Transaction growth +defi growth + dapps = $ETH can easily be in the thousands of dollars in a few short years. I stand by my prediction of $4000+ by end of 2021 #ethereum | 2 replies 1 retweets 18 likes | |
| 1187527815945539584 2019-10-24 17:34:29 -0700 <POVCryptoPod> Fight Night IX: Wyre & On-Ramps, EIP 1559, Ether Seigniorage, New Sharding Spec Available first on YouTube! Check it out ahead of podcast release! https://t.co/sZH7BPzxRk Topics: - @sendwyre’s new on-ramp! - EIP 1559; Seniorage for ETH holders? - @econoar - New sharding spec | 3 replies 5 retweets 8 likes | |
| 1187536412070907904 2019-10-24 18:08:38 -0700 <0xTycoon> @econoar lol, wat? seigniorage? EIP-1559 is mostly to improve the UX for the user. Wallets will be able to predict the gas prices better, stops "why is my kitty not breeding, wallet said 1 minute, it's been 4 hours!" Get'em Eric! | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1187559940967284737 2019-10-24 19:42:08 -0700 <ChainNewscom> 【经济学分析以太坊 EIP-1559 提案的荒谬之处】该提案只会让用户为了交易而付出的费用变得更多，因为不仅矿工要钱，协议也在向用户收税。 https://t.co/on3PzwwVkr | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1187781269402161152 2019-10-25 10:21:37 -0700 <TrustlessState> Get your EIP 1559 content here!! Plus some other good banter, surrounding ETH staking, etc | 0 replies 3 retweets 6 likes | |
| 1187955347551469569 2019-10-25 21:53:20 -0700 <th_sat> 新たな手数料体系EIP1559の解説。現状のGas設定から、BASEFEE（ネットワーク混雑状況により自動決定）と tip（急ぎたいときの追加フィー）を払うモデルへの転換を図るもの。 https://t.co/CJGQGbbzrj | 0 replies 1 retweets 8 likes | |
| 1188049365992202243 2019-10-26 04:06:56 -0700 <Cheirut> @marcoJcosta @checksum0 @cgcardona We agree on this...there should be a better approach. Look up EIP 1559 https://t.co/vu48P1wuYM | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1188259296808558592 2019-10-26 18:01:07 -0700 <cipepser> EIP1559でプレミアがバーンされるのってblock producerやるインセンティブあるんです？ETHもっておけばいいのでわざわざproducerになる必要があるのかわかっていない。 | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1188523659628929034 2019-10-27 11:31:36 -0700 <POVCryptoPod> Sundays are for YouTube! Once the ball game is over, check out some un-released podcast episodes, available on our YouTube channel! Subscribe to get that early access! Fight Night IX: https://t.co/sZH7BPzxRk -@sendwyre -EIP 1559 -Ether seigniorage with Staking | 1 replies 1 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1188549850746494977 2019-10-27 13:15:41 -0700 <Syncubate> @antsankov I think #ethereum can employ some combo of the above as it irons out its MNI approach to monetary supply. A max ceiling on the annual % increase of the supply would be a good start for setting limits. EIP 1559 also seems akin to a stock buyback by burning ETH from transactions. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1188550557847474176 2019-10-27 13:18:29 -0700 <karmawithdharma> @TrustlessState - If you ever get curious - What would a stock to flow of ETH look like and how does EIP 1559 impact this? | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1188622469378260998 2019-10-27 18:04:14 -0700 <DaxTaran> @koeppelmann @socrates1024 @RyanSAdams @PeterSchiff EIP 1559, Ethereum monetary policy, I would suggest doing some googling on these two topics. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1188809892439711745 2019-10-28 06:29:00 -0700 <musatheredguard> @MashuriBC @omarcantos @RyanSAdams Look up transaction fees and EIP-1559 | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1188842226845138944 2019-10-28 08:37:29 -0700 <trent_vanepps> @ercwl @killerstorm @hasufl @MrHodl @hexlib @edixonve @zndtoshi @RainDogDance EIP 1559 burn could potentially offset issuance | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1188857377782550536 2019-10-28 09:37:41 -0700 <apruden08> @econoar maybe I missed this, but what happened to EIP-1559? Just saw that it is out for Istanbul. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1189195624031244288 2019-10-29 08:01:45 -0700 <POVCryptoPod> Fight Night IX: Wyre & On-Ramps, EIP 1559, Ether Seigniorage, New Sharding Spec https://t.co/yXzSYGK7Am David and Christian go through recent news and developments in the crypto-space! TOPICS👇🏼👇🏼 | 1 replies 3 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1189195624928837632 2019-10-29 08:01:45 -0700 <POVCryptoPod> @sendwyre releases new on-ramp vehicle that allows instant delivery - Christian’s concerns about EIP 1559 and how it takes from the users and gives to the stakers - New sharding spec design released by Vitalik. Does this delay ETH 2? - Christian’s bet that Phase 0 will be delayed | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1189237935834574849 2019-10-29 10:49:53 -0700 <POVCryptoPod> On Wednesday, a dual-panel between @RyanSAdams and @econoar discussing - EIP 1559 - how Ethereum is building a parallel economy model, to a traditional national state economy | 1 replies 2 retweets 8 likes | |
| 1189332834206601216 2019-10-29 17:06:59 -0700 <th_sat> LayerX Newsletter for Techのリンク編では、「仮想通貨交換所Zaif、取引所間の即時決済行う「SETTLENET」に参加」や「新たな手数料体系EIP1559の解説」「Avalancheについて」などを紹介しています。 https://t.co/HZIfae8HOG | 0 replies 1 retweets 6 likes | |
| 1189340240487604225 2019-10-29 17:36:24 -0700 <TrustlessState> @rob_mose @ck_SNARKs The big differences is that BR + EIP1559 can actually make a blockchain that has negative issuance in its best-case scenario | 2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1189885839775371264 2019-10-31 05:44:25 -0700 <META_DREAMER> Just because the architecture is not fully there yet, doesn’t mean we just sit on our asses and wait. There’s a lot of work that can be done in the meantime today while we wait for things like EIP1559. You don’t skate to where the puck is now, you skate to where the puck is going | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1189974382887817217 2019-10-31 11:36:16 -0700 <DoubleNSC> @spencernoon Jenny I've got your number! EIP-1559 | 1 replies 1 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1190031407852261378 2019-10-31 15:22:52 -0700 <econoar> Vitalik just posted “Skinny EIP-1559”. “This is a proposal to implement a greatly simplified transaction fee reform mechanic that is intended to have similar (though slightly less optimal) effects to EIP 1559 but at ~1/5 the implementation complexity.” https://t.co/DyNFO15MXn | 3 replies 26 retweets 97 likes | |
| 1190101717347647489 2019-10-31 20:02:15 -0700 <veliko_test3> Skinny EIP 1559 -- vbuterin https://t.co/Q1mbo0r9Aa | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1190106472572698624 2019-10-31 20:21:08 -0700 <DomainAddress4u> Skinny EIP 1559 -- vbuterin via /r/ethereum https://t.co/ZNnQJdLl42 hot 🔥 in #reddit #ethereum #eth #crypto | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1190122906526859264 2019-10-31 21:26:26 -0700 <EthfinanceR> Vitalik proposes "Skinny EIP 1559" via /r/ethfinance https://t.co/24JTI2brO6 $ETH #Ethereum #EthFinance | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1190134670832414720 2019-10-31 22:13:11 -0700 <CryptoCryptoNe3> Skinny EIP 1559 -- vbuterin CRYPTO CRYPTO NEWS - https://t.co/DpifT2U9k0 https://t.co/EzUQHOLFj0 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1190157040292777984 2019-10-31 23:42:05 -0700 <CryptoTraderPro> Crypto Panic: Skinny EIP 1559 -- vbuterin https://t.co/2TsgyhuL6p 🙋Crypto Cashflow via → https://t.co/2p1Vt5799c | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1190197646809423872 2019-11-01 02:23:26 -0700 <the_crypto_feed> /r/ethereum: skinny eip 1559 -- vbuterin https://t.co/5xnTruLod4 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1190267502972063744 2019-11-01 07:01:01 -0700 <ETHGasStation> Meet Skinny EIP 1559 by @VitalikButerin: "This is a proposal to implement a greatly simplified transaction fee reform mechanic that is intended to have similar (though slightly less optimal) effects to EIP 1559 but at ~1/5 the implementation complexity." https://t.co/ReDhxQjsIp | 0 replies 4 retweets 9 likes | |
| 1190286801321287680 2019-11-01 08:17:42 -0700 <TimBeiko> There's a request to bless EIP-1559, which was authored by @VitalikButerin a while back, and that @econoar / @AFDudley0 have been championing & working on. | 1 replies 1 retweets 6 likes | |
| 1190308608032071680 2019-11-01 09:44:21 -0700 <antiprosynth> @TimBeiko @cyber_hokie I don't think I've seen anyone complain or make strong arguments beyond technical considerations against EIP 1559, state rent or the transition to ETH 2.0. I think that is the main difference. | 1 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1190658011984879618 2019-11-02 08:52:46 -0700 <danfinlay> I may not be understanding eip 1559 right, so would love more eth friends weighing this option. | 1 replies 5 retweets 11 likes | |
| 1191052120750874624 2019-11-03 09:58:48 -0700 <TrustlessState> @antiprosynth @econoar @ck_SNARKs @DoubleNSC @CryptoEcon_Li I would consider things like EIP 1559, and the variable issuance algorithm as dynamic components of Ethereum that ensure a balance between security of the chain and hardness/soundness of the asset | 2 replies 2 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1191307222959001601 2019-11-04 02:52:30 -0700 <CarrascosaCris_> Fixing the Ethereum Fee Market (EIP-1559) - Eric Conner. “The idea is to start with a BASEFEE amount which is adjusted up and down by the protocol based on how congested the network is” https://t.co/khUDnk5502 | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1191397868537569281 2019-11-04 08:52:41 -0700 <Ethereum_France> La Semaine d’Ethereum, 3 novembre : - L’EIP 1559 perds du poids et de la complexité - 🚀 Eth2 : maj de clients, specs v0.9 finalisées - ⚔️ Ethereum vs Fabric vs Corda - 💸 Tether migre en ERC20 - DeFi : bZx, Dharma, Maple... https://t.co/U8QBr6odIX cc @evan_van_ness | 0 replies 5 retweets 6 likes | |
| 1191658417053671425 2019-11-05 02:08:01 -0700 <EthereumNetw> Skinny EIP 1559 @VitalikButerin #ETHEREUM https://t.co/KIbTKqLca6 | 0 replies 4 retweets 15 likes | |
| 1191711043149430784 2019-11-05 05:37:08 -0700 <_sgtn> 今日の #ethfuk では - fee market (Skinny EIP1559) - Plasmaのrunning costのrisk hedge - 利他主義と功利的利他主義の違い - BitcoinのSecurity Assumptionからくる設計の癖 - EthereumのBitcoin化がみられる箇所 - zk-SNARKsでstakerに匿名性を持たせる技術 などをざっくばらんに話しました | 1 replies 1 retweets 8 likes | |
| 1191764873421582336 2019-11-05 09:11:02 -0700 <ethhub_io> EthHub Weekly Recap #86 -@austingriffith brings Burner Wallet to @splunk conf -@BitMEXdotcom email leak -@maplefinance smart bonds -@VitalikButerin writes skinny EIP-1559 -@NodarJ announced DeFiZap -@UniswapExchange turns 1 -Is Ethereum unforkable? https://t.co/pqKk4RCAh3 | 0 replies 16 retweets 42 likes | |
| 1192078248177483776 2019-11-06 05:56:16 -0700 <0xEther> @ChrisBlec @Khnum_0 @antiprosynth - ETH futures - Beacon Chain (deposits soon) - ETH 2 (issuance drop + green narrative) - EIP 1559 - MCD - DSR - Halving - China/USA blockchain race - Libra It's unsustainable for $ETH to trade horizontally on these factors. Nov/Dev bulls could well break it. | 0 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1192122600433995777 2019-11-06 08:52:31 -0700 <sassal0x> @harrycanuck The yearly issuance under Eth2 should be 0.5% or less. Then throw in ETH burned via EIP-1559, lost/locked ETH, ETH locked in DeFi/DAOs/etc (the growth in that is already higher than ETHs current 5%+ issuance) and ETH lost to slashing. This *could* put issuance at 0% or less. | 1 replies 1 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1192253469173932033 2019-11-06 17:32:32 -0700 <galloway_the> @bitfalls @antiprosynth @FigoFinozeros Good article! There has recently been discussions with regards to EIP 1559 about a minimum gas price of 1 Gwei before miners stop accepting blocks due to the risk of uncles. Is 1 gwei per Gas the low limit or could that be modified by changing the gas limit or something else? | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1193420514548600833 2019-11-09 22:49:58 -0700 <nickwh8te> My milestones so far: 30% ☑️ on NFT game, brought on @mattdlockyer as in-house #blockchain gaming lead 💥 70% ☑️ on #staking design, research on EIP 1559, target staking rate, first draft in review ✍️ 20% ☑️ on #CMO, job description ready, now push into hiring channels 📢 https://t.co/613H1ilxx0 | 3 replies 5 retweets 21 likes | |
| 1193706933787619334 2019-11-10 17:48:05 -0700 <0xTycoon> @BobMcElrath Sure. In ETH 2.0, each transaction will burn some Ether, effectively destroying it. EIP-1559 has also been drafted to retrofit this in to ETH 1.x too. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1194422695263383552 2019-11-12 17:12:16 -0700 <AnselLindner> EIP1559 Perpetual spigot for stakers (32+ eth) Perpetual fees for non-stakers Little guy blah blah. | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1194780585484521472 2019-11-13 16:54:24 -0700 <AnselLindner> 5/ Now we have the new EIP 1559 proposal. Perpetual inflation to stakers + penalize usage with burning. Yet more incentive to hoard through staking. | 1 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1195043602201792514 2019-11-14 10:19:32 -0700 <CryptoADavid> @tokenstate @UniswapExchange @coinbase @ParadexIO Wait until EIP 1559 👌👌🔥 | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1195478893064441856 2019-11-15 15:09:13 -0700 <Metropolis1987> @pet3rpan_ @MolochDAO EIP-1559 | 0 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1195509581386014722 2019-11-15 17:11:10 -0700 <pedrouid> @pet3rpan_ @MolochDAO EIP-1559 | 1 replies 0 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1195956701473562626 2019-11-16 22:47:52 -0700 <lastmjs> @Foobazzler @sassal0x @IslandHunting @cburniske I'm not sure if will be like that exactly. Not with EIP-1559, I believe it is. Gas will be burned | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1196075002317230080 2019-11-17 06:37:57 -0700 <AFDudley0> @kacperwikiel @MPtherealMVP oh, I was referring more to vulcanizeDB than EIP-1559. I feel Lightning Network has similar funding issues. Raiden Network had to sell a token, etc etc. | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1196098309225623552 2019-11-17 08:10:34 -0700 <GregusJakub> @marco_peereboom @cburniske No cap is not a problem as total network issuance is very low (even lower than btc inflation until 2028, except of very unlikely situation when is staked 100M of ETH). Counterintuitively with implementation of EIP-1559 ethereum can become deflationary as fees will be burned. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1196146531985973248 2019-11-17 11:22:11 -0700 <hugofirefreire> @cburniske @marco_peereboom And with EIP-1559 (Fee market change) you will burn some #eth in every transaction so this will make a good combo too IMO https://t.co/VT8pvZ5FoB | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1196212154178981888 2019-11-17 15:42:56 -0700 <Crypto_Patoruzu> @LocalEthereumES Yo creo que sí. Y con ETH 2.0, la implementacion del EIP 1559 y demás maravillas que están desarrollando, no queda otra que ir para arriba. Y con fuerza. | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1196246968542085125 2019-11-17 18:01:17 -0700 <VitalikButerin> @ofnumbers "In equilibrium, the blockchain maintains only users relatively insensitive to payment confirmation delays." I think EIP 1559 pretty much completely solves this, and makes delays one block for most users. | 2 replies 6 retweets 15 likes | |
| 1198280655626330112 2019-11-23 08:42:25 -0700 <Greaves1704> @DefiRate @MakerDAO @Gemini @SetProtocol @tokensets @synthetix_io Basically ~4% of all ETH now locked in smart contracts. now add in future defi growth + staking + more utility use once scalability arrives + EIP 1559. Very tasty | 0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1198356887936176128 2019-11-23 13:45:21 -0700 <econoar> I think people really underestimate how truly inhibiting the current gas market is for Ethereum. I’d argue it’s the #1 UX barrier to more adoption. Luckily eth2 will attempt to address a lot of this with an eip1559 style fee market and added capacity resulting in cheaper fees. | 5 replies 8 retweets 86 likes | |
| 1198378727895420928 2019-11-23 15:12:08 -0700 <FrancescoRenziA> @econoar @JimmyRagosa Was really impressed with EIP 1559. What are the main impediments? | 2 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1198384699787399169 2019-11-23 15:35:51 -0700 <FrancescoRenziA> @econoar @JimmyRagosa I hope all is not lost. EIP1559 is super important. Happy to help any way I can. Maybe a funding campaign on next GitCoin round? | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1198844906325893126 2019-11-24 22:04:33 -0700 <2mizeen> @econoar @DeanEigenmann @twobitidiot Can it work similar to the fee market in eth 2 with a bit of block rewards and a bit of tx fees with eip 1559 like burn included? | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1198847993719353345 2019-11-24 22:16:49 -0700 <0xTycoon> Quick! Quick! While everyone is busy looking at the charts in disbelief, let's get EIP-1559 in to the next Ethereum hard fork after Istanbul! 😉 | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1199001728919592960 2019-11-25 08:27:43 -0700 <Jihoz_Axie> @alexgausman Eip 1559 save us | 0 replies 1 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1199176128348356613 2019-11-25 20:00:43 -0700 <masaoyana> DeFiエコシステム概要（イーサリアム） DeFiの全体像をザクっと知りたい方向けの記事です Etherはマネー？→EIP1559サラッと DAIについて→DeFiプロダクトで可能なこと マネーレゴの概念→Instadapp、Argent紹介 ネットワーク効果（dappの相互作用）→Uniswap紹介 https://t.co/a5dOQUNCcs | 0 replies 4 retweets 10 likes | |
| 1200467847807488001 2019-11-29 09:33:33 -0700 <MatrixLegacy> @antiprosynth @BambouClub Yeah $ETH may develop better monetary characteristics down the road with EIP 1559. The optionality of $ETH is looking pretty good vs $BTC unless there's some technological breakthrough that scales $BTC in a significant way. | 2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1200473206886453249 2019-11-29 09:54:50 -0700 <antiprosynth> @MatrixLegacy @BambouClub EIP 1559 is just one factor even. The asymmetric security model of proof of stake allows for far lower issuance for similar degree of security, and DeFi as well as staking causes auditable lockup of ETH supply. Add slashing to that and actual issuance rate will be less than zero. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1200527736055287808 2019-11-29 13:31:31 -0700 <stse> https://t.co/cQVcuKpAKN @harmonyprotocol token economic model issuance rates: 1.7% in 2050 (bitcoin 0%, zcash 42%) staking target: 35% (cosmo 66%, polkadot 50%) validator yield: 10.6% in 2022 at 35% stakes fee market: eip 1559, storage rent excel code at https://t.co/RHk8UNowlM | 0 replies 8 retweets 28 likes | |
| 1200641725204615168 2019-11-29 21:04:28 -0700 <Harmony_CN1> #每日Harmony同步更新 https://t.co/RhbppCTe8J 通证经济模型 发行率：2050年为1.7%（比特币0％，zcash 42％） 质押目标：35％（cosmos 66％，polkadot50％） 验证者收益率：2022年35%的质押可获得10.6%的收益 收费市场：eip 1559，托管租赁 Excel数据表请查阅： https://t.co/Uv7IUR8oYx | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1202269336909631489 2019-12-04 08:52:01 -0700 <RyanSAdams> @TimBeiko 1. Eth2 2. Finality gadget 3. Stateless for eth1 4. Eip 1559 | 1 replies 1 retweets 11 likes | |
| 1202272518926667777 2019-12-04 09:04:40 -0700 <RyanSAdams> @TimBeiko Also agreed Another way to slice it is to look at the ROI of each Both Finality Gadget and EIP 1559 have a tangible, quantifiable ROI (in terms of issuance reduction / burning) The ETH long-term investor community can get excited about ROI and help fund if well coordinated | 0 replies 2 retweets 10 likes | |
| 1202313969668689920 2019-12-04 11:49:22 -0700 <trent_vanepps> @hosseeb in that AMA you said "But if ETH 2.0 goes down the road of pure deflation + txn fees (which I guess is now on the roadmap?), that sounds more problematic to me." EIP 1559 would cancel out some issuance but not all, are you familiar with the effort? | 1 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1202963066364710912 2019-12-06 06:48:39 -0700 <sassal0x> @CryptoParent @H3nr1c0V @tokensets @felix2feng Here's hoping we get EIP-1559 soon so that we have better fee estimation across the entire Ethereum network 🙏 | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1203018434813890560 2019-12-06 10:28:40 -0700 <hosseeb> @trent_vanepps I am familiar, actually wrote a blog post about it a while back: https://t.co/MgwvStQm7e I wasn't aware that EIP-1559 affected issuance though? | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1203141222598086656 2019-12-06 18:36:35 -0700 <boston_gamer> @econoar Nothing wrong if the change serves other purposes. By this logic, you should feel uneasy about EIP 1559. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1204020282010157056 2019-12-09 04:49:39 -0700 <0xTycoon> @stacking_gwei But wait, there's more ✅ lower inflation (stakening before halvening) ✅ improved gas market & ETH economics (EIP-1559 baked in) | 0 replies 1 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1204104699315539968 2019-12-09 10:25:06 -0700 <econoar> It looks as if @AFDudley0's team has been building out the implementation for EIP-1559 and is nearly done. https://t.co/voE49ao4Jw | 5 replies 10 retweets 95 likes | |
| 1204110645735636993 2019-12-09 10:48:43 -0700 <meeseeking> Whoa where did this come from? Was this a Christmas surprise you got for everyone and forgot about and just left under the tree? Great gift, Rick Claus! #Ethereum #eip1559 | 0 replies 1 retweets 13 likes | |
| 1204250369657724928 2019-12-09 20:03:56 -0700 <MayatoHattori> EIP-1559の開発進んでいるのか！すごい！ | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1204860587672559616 2019-12-11 12:28:43 -0700 <JaEsf> @adam3us @factcheckmypost @ercwl @peterktodd Uhh like most obviously the ZK Sync work that started this thread. Or other rollup work, Casper FFG, Uniswap, MakerDAO, EIP 1559, ... | 1 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1205192553873756162 2019-12-12 10:27:50 -0700 <TheCryptoTrans> @Arthur_0x I haven’t had one day where I didn’t see an ETH is money tweet. But we need EIP-1559, or some version of it. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1205483535513137157 2019-12-13 05:44:06 -0700 <TimBeiko> Back to live-tweet another @ethereum #AllCoreDevs this week. Don't have to stream it, so I should at least get the tweets right 😅 Starting in ~20 minutes. Big agenda: Ice Age, EIP-1559, EIP-1962. See you soon 👋🏻 Agenda: https://t.co/fYbEtNC2Iq Stream: https://t.co/4shXDdH9YT | 3 replies 5 retweets 34 likes | |
| 1205493284002500612 2019-12-13 06:22:50 -0700 <TimBeiko> And now, we're discussing the Eligible For Inclusion (EFI) EIPs: First up is EIP-1559! | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1205497856179744768 2019-12-13 06:41:00 -0700 <TimBeiko> @peter_szilagyi @AFDudley0 @hudsonjameson @EthMagicians And that's it for EIP-1559! Now we're discussing EIP-1962 😄 One roadblock on the implementation: how to measure the gas cost for a precompile call to a particular curve family. The original approach, described in detail on the call, failed 😞 | 1 replies 1 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1206561989708963842 2019-12-16 05:09:29 -0700 <Ethereum_France> - $ Maker corrige une faille de gouvernance - ⏳@SablierHQ est live - 🏦 Propriété @RealTPlatform vendue - 💸 Frais de transaction révisés (EIP 1559) - 💥 Prêt sans collatéral en #DeFi … et bcp d’autres choses ! https://t.co/MUxxNgbkbK @Evan_van_ness | 0 replies 2 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1206642041226174471 2019-12-16 10:27:35 -0700 <scott_lew_is> The nearly straight down chart over the last 20 months should make it clear that our strategic priors need to be iterated. EIP-1559 isn't a fix for current problems. It's just a START. It needs to be done as quickly as is feasible/ | 3 replies 2 retweets 29 likes | |
| 1206645125658611712 2019-12-16 10:39:50 -0700 <davidiach> @scott_lew_is This 💯! It's cool that we managed to lock 2.7m ETH in DeFi so far, but in the last year we have also added 5.1m ETH to the supply as mining rewards. We need EIP-1559 and we need PoS. | 1 replies 1 retweets 15 likes | |
| 1206750456896081921 2019-12-16 17:38:23 -0700 <willmorriss4> @scott_lew_is EIP 1559 incentivizes miners to fill blocks with their own fake transactions. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1206959653952860160 2019-12-17 07:29:40 -0700 <SgtHodl> @scott_lew_is Whats EIP 1559? | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1206995784408977409 2019-12-17 09:53:14 -0700 <scott_lew_is> A healthy blockchain community needs more stability than that. The way you get stability is by securing the value to anchor points. The most obvious anchor points are burning a base fee a la EIP-1559 and a second protocol change to a large portion of the miner/staker tips. | 3 replies 2 retweets 20 likes | |
| 1207025391682146305 2019-12-17 11:50:53 -0700 <scott_lew_is> @nicksdjohnson seems a bit strawman-y here. i specifically said that eip-1559 was just a start and alone would not fix much. i don't think i have to do a guest lecture on how markets works in order to talk about markets on twitter, but i may at some point in the future, regardless. | 2 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1207065973011951616 2019-12-17 14:32:08 -0700 <NapoleonBlum> @scott_lew_is If you are talking of a slightly modified EIP-1559 for ETH1.0 i'm 100% behind you in my opinion it would be much more safer and healthier than lowering the current block reward. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1207103741729660929 2019-12-17 17:02:13 -0700 <Shizcrey> @nicksdjohnson @iamDCinvestor @scott_lew_is Agreed here. Should never do something simply for the sake of narratives. Bitcoin can survive off memes, give them that use case. Don't try to emulate it. Does EIP-1559 make Ethereum better? Not "does EIP-1559 inflate our bags?" | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1207230820215209984 2019-12-18 01:27:11 -0700 <CCassets> ふーさんの2年前の予言すげーｗ EIP1559でこれが現実になろうとしている☆ | 0 replies 2 retweets 16 likes | |
| 1207250280951103488 2019-12-18 02:44:31 -0700 <RooT_689> EIP1559？ https://t.co/x31nhBuB8S | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1207276836822011904 2019-12-18 04:30:02 -0700 <LongShortFundin> @omarcantos @antiprosynth @davecraige @rosscopaddison @onchainfx Just noticed your last sentence, "Once users hop in, price and security will follow". This is untrue. Network usage for Ethereum right now has 0 relationship with value capture in the native $ETH asset. EIP1559 needs to be implemented asap. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1207287296736866307 2019-12-18 05:11:36 -0700 <omarcantos> @KeithLeaff @antiprosynth @davecraige @rosscopaddison @onchainfx Well, as long as you need eth to pay for fees... more usage -> more fees -> more eth demand -> number go up Not my area of expertise btw. EIP1559 sounds really good to me. I thought it was going to be implemented in Istanbul. Not sure why it didn't make it. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1207401210724012032 2019-12-18 12:44:15 -0700 <CoinGapeMedia> #Ethereum EIP 1559 Could Stabilize Ethereum but Will it Help spur $ETH Demand? https://t.co/qQPQP2gtnX | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1207401676434362368 2019-12-18 12:46:06 -0700 <CryptoBitsNews1> EIP 1559 Could Stabilize Ethereum but Will it Help spur ETH https://t.co/gJmkLjlB2T #Bitcoin #Bitcoinnews #BTC #Crypto #Cryptocurrency #Cryptonews #digitalcurrency #Ethereum #hodl #Litecoin | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1207402132577673216 2019-12-18 12:47:55 -0700 <Blockboard_news> Ethereum: EIP 1559 Could Stabilize Ethereum but Will it Help spur ETH Demand? - https://t.co/t3gUGp7HCs | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1207402133504643074 2019-12-18 12:47:55 -0700 <Blockboard_news> Ethereum: EIP 1559 Could Stabilize Ethereum but Will it Help spur ETH Demand? - https://t.co/fDKFMsrOXy | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1207403074823827456 2019-12-18 12:51:40 -0700 <thecryptokeepr> Ethereum: EIP 1559 Could Stabilize Ethereum but Will it Help spur ETH Demand? >>@ https://t.co/XHilV5pLSv || $btc $eth $ltc $xrp $vet https://t.co/cYik8adLuS | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1207407221203783681 2019-12-18 13:08:08 -0700 <0xzxcom> 以太坊：EIP 1559可以稳定以太坊，但是否会刺激以太坊需求？ https://t.co/OJhFaOCw0t https://t.co/CJHxpquxma | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1207407524124729346 2019-12-18 13:09:20 -0700 <CryptoNewswire> EIP 1559 Could Stabilize Ethereum but Will it Help spur ETH Demand? - https://t.co/Z8V9EKMI0a $BTC $ETH #fintech #investing #cryptocurrencies | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1207408747880091650 2019-12-18 13:14:12 -0700 <bitcoinschannel> EIP 1559 Could Stabilize Ethereum but Will it Help spur ETH Demand? - https://t.co/ITaCLRuraX | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1207443689267556352 2019-12-18 15:33:03 -0700 <CryptoTelegram_> Ethereum: EIP 1559 Could Stabilize Ethereum but Will it Help spur ETH Demand? https://t.co/96rgXxcoe6 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1207446833053589504 2019-12-18 15:45:32 -0700 <hashfeedio> Ethereum: EIP 1559 Could Stabilize Ethereum but Will it Help spur ETH Demand? #AltcoinNews #EIP1559 https://t.co/r6QibnfNuu https://t.co/M7H4OtkJpY | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1207548756222070785 2019-12-18 22:30:33 -0700 <0xTycoon> @sassal0x Low, lower than bitcoins's, near 0 inflation - for the same level of security & even better decentralization. (Assuming EIP 1559 will be baked in) | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1207572052472991744 2019-12-19 00:03:07 -0700 <RssBit> #Crypto #News: "Ethereum: EIP 1559 Could Stabilize Ethereum but Will it Help spur ETH Demand?" https://t.co/BJaKg0UZaI | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1207573824193155072 2019-12-19 00:10:09 -0700 <bitcns> Ethereum: EIP 1559 Could Stabilize Ethereum but Will it Help spur ETH Demand? https://t.co/PobXJ8jvaH | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1207574421264834560 2019-12-19 00:12:32 -0700 <BeCrusaders> Ethereum: EIP 1559 Could Stabilize Ethereum but Will it Help spur ETH Demand? https://t.co/TXaHiLTtjd | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1207576846331793410 2019-12-19 00:22:10 -0700 <crypto_fury> Ethereum: EIP 1559 Could Stabilize Ethereum but Will it Help spur ETH Demand? https://t.co/7ncYHL4qsq | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1207580660581441536 2019-12-19 00:37:19 -0700 <BitBoxNews> Ethereum: EIP 1559 Could Stabilize Ethereum but Will it Help spur ETH Demand? https://t.co/eOv74jYu8E | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1207589928076554240 2019-12-19 01:14:09 -0700 <johnmorganFL> #Ethereum: EIP 1559 Could Stabilize #Ethereum but Will it Help spur #ETH Demand? https://t.co/UMKQtM8U9u https://t.co/9dWtZDgRrm | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1207624163340378112 2019-12-19 03:30:11 -0700 <0xTycoon> @MuteDialog But is it compatible with EIP1559? I.e. base-fee would get burned,.. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1207792640118251520 2019-12-19 14:39:39 -0700 <0xTycoon> @koeppelmann @sassal0x @antiprosynth I'm more optimistic on stakers earning from block rewards rather than fees, considering EIP-1559 will be baked in to ETH 2.0 | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1207805935231455232 2019-12-19 15:32:29 -0700 <Digikaze> New post: Ethereum: EIP 1559 Could Stabilize Ethereum but Will it Help spur ETH Demand? https://t.co/6xIV3o3mSp | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1207897271108456448 2019-12-19 21:35:25 -0700 <LongShortFundin> @gautamchhugani Fuel is burned when used, $BNB doesn't. $BNB used for network fees goes back to validators whom will have to sell at some point. Instead, and similar EIP-1559 of $ETH should be implemented so that $BNB can capture value, by burning a small amount whenever it's used for fees. | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1208180798794297344 2019-12-20 16:22:04 -0700 <econoar> @mdudas @gnosisSafe Thanks. I’d definitely agree with current fee UX being the top issue. It’s why I’m so supportive of eip-1559 which will help a lot. | 0 replies 0 retweets 15 likes | |
| 1208556636463198208 2019-12-21 17:15:30 -0700 <CCassets> Eth1.0スケーリングは、 EIP1559が実装されれば16Mgasのブロックガスリミットになる。 gasfeeを度外視するばらば、 最大で約250~300万TX/日が処理上限になる。 ぜんぜん足りなさそうｗｗ | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1209941985479536646 2019-12-25 13:00:23 -0700 <AFDudley0> LOL sigh. Hopefully, we can get EIP-1559 in production soon. | 0 replies 0 retweets 7 likes | |
| 1210588463273259012 2019-12-27 07:49:15 -0700 <musatheredguard> @B0b0lf0 @antiprosynth Tether didn't move to ethereum because it was cheaper, they moved because of the network effects and infra built around ethereum. Value capture will be enshrined at the protocol level with EIP-1559 | 1 replies 5 retweets 19 likes | |
| 1210685205263990784 2019-12-27 14:13:41 -0700 <sassal0x> 5/ March: -@setprotocol introduces Strategy Enabled Tokens -@defipulse goes live -@econoar proposes EIP-1559 -@molochdao rises | 1 replies 1 retweets 32 likes | |
| 1210685634613874688 2019-12-27 14:15:23 -0700 <sassal0x> 30/ November: -@splunk uses the Burner Wallet at their conference -@maplefinance introduced -@vitalikbuterin proposes skinny EIP-1559 -@defi_zap released by @nodarj and team -@gnosis launches Sight prediction market | 1 replies 3 retweets 16 likes | |
| 1211023737434148864 2019-12-28 12:38:53 -0700 <ChainLinkGod> @iDecentralized @DLTPandu $ETH valuation is important for security true, but the tokenomics for $ETH are quite flawed right now, EIP 1559 and staking will help no doubt, but it still stands that $LINK will capture more of the value of a Smart Contract as without a secure trigger, the contract is worthless | 1 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1211025151711563777 2019-12-28 12:44:30 -0700 <ChainLinkGod> @iDecentralized @DLTPandu The question is where will the value of the contract accrue ETH benefits indirectly from usage of the network (directly with EIP 1559), but LINK benefits directly from the downward velocity of staking on each contract's data request | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1211237156414357504 2019-12-29 02:46:56 -0700 <0xTycoon> @paddypisa EIP-1559 fixes this | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1211288024375414790 2019-12-29 06:09:04 -0700 <Greaves1704> @Febrocas @antiprosynth @OmerPeleg1 @davidiach My understanding is that inflation will be around 3-4% from staking but will be offset as part of fees are burnt. This is outlined in EIP-1559. | 2 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1211320522899959808 2019-12-29 08:18:12 -0700 <Greaves1704> @antiprosynth @Febrocas @OmerPeleg1 @davidiach Do we have any idea how much deflation could occur per year from burning fees on EIP-1559 @antiprosynth? | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1212470293039443969 2020-01-01 12:26:59 -0700 <fubuloubu> And actually, with EIP1559, issuance would *reduce* by a bit with every transaction, so issuance may eventually tend negative. There will be 21m BTC, but there *may* eventually be 21m ETH 🤔 (If we look at astronomical timescales like 100 years lol) | 0 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1212591452712132608 2020-01-01 20:28:25 -0700 <0xTycoon> @econoar Save the "ETH is Money" fork for when EIP1559 is in! | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1212827402662842369 2020-01-02 12:06:00 -0700 <ChainLinkGod> @RyanSAdams Besides PoS & DeFi lockup + EIP1559 burning, what can be implemented in ETH2 to make $ETH more scarce/desirable to own/lockup? | 2 replies 2 retweets 11 likes | |
| 1213077759980736512 2020-01-03 04:40:50 -0700 <0xTycoon> Which is more likely? (Assuming EIP-1559 is to be accepted) There may.... | 2 replies 4 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1213194620307304448 2020-01-03 12:25:12 -0700 <econoar> @max_bronstein Mostly agree. Dapp level UX has come a long way and I’d argue many defi apps have better UX than cefi. However, Ethereum has large UX issues still, mainly the fee market and seed phrases. Eip-1559 can help solve feed and SC wallets seed phrases. But we need to fix those. | 1 replies 0 retweets 7 likes | |
| 1213223242535596032 2020-01-03 14:18:56 -0700 <joshuahjohnson> @PhABCD @owocki @KyleSamani Once EIP 1559 comes out I don’t think this would be sustainable. But it would be great for the ETH price so I would still expect to see versions of this pop up. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1213224930466312194 2020-01-03 14:25:38 -0700 <PhABCD> @joshuahjohnson @owocki @KyleSamani EIP 1559 does not solve the problem at hand. EIP-1559 makes it easier to use the correct current gas price, but if 99% of the blocks are for a Ponzi scheme, there is not much EIP-1559 can help with. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1213235781793243137 2020-01-03 15:08:45 -0700 <0xTycoon> @mysticryuujin @antiprosynth I'd say P = 0 for BTC. P > 0 for ETH. But for a very tiny, tiny, P. This is assuming EIP-1559 in particular, and then slashings, lost keys / abandoned coins, coins locked in contracts and so on. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1213249065799938048 2020-01-03 16:01:33 -0700 <ChainLinkGod> @Foobazzler Ah gotcha, yeah $ETH performance has been quite shitty, no real reason to buy any right now other than speculation of the future, but that's just a tokenomics issue, hopefully will be improved w/ PoS + EIP1559 | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1213260634399264768 2020-01-03 16:47:31 -0700 <ChainLinkGod> @Foobazzler @cryptoarsenal By the time those large companies use Ethereum Mainnet we'll have PoS lockup, EIP1559 burning, L1 sharding, and continued #DeFi lockup of $ETH | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1213267562219225088 2020-01-03 17:15:02 -0700 <ChainLinkGod> @Foobazzler @cryptoarsenal @ConsenSys Some directly will, all of them indirectly Trillions cannot flow through Ethereum without there being enough economic bandwidth to utilize, but the question you're asking is how do we raise that bandwidth Answer is still PoS+DeFi lockup, eip1559 burn, and a good narratives | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1213313027744944128 2020-01-03 20:15:42 -0700 <notgrubles> @kiyoaki0 @ercwl I think Eric is referring to EIP-1559 which seems to allow miners to adjust transaction fees and for some reason ETH is burned in the process? | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1213896357301358592 2020-01-05 10:53:39 -0700 <TheCryptoTrans> @econoar When is a version of EIP-1559 coming? | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1213898048226516992 2020-01-05 11:00:22 -0700 <econoar> @ph_lux It uses the eip1559 model so the entire basefee is burned. Validators keep the “tip”. https://t.co/hDFC8uzFA0 | 1 replies 0 retweets 6 likes | |
| 1213940388320276480 2020-01-05 13:48:37 -0700 <econoar> @taoteh1221 Only the basefee is burned on the tx fees. Any “tip” above is kept. Same as eip1559 | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1214096164976508928 2020-01-06 00:07:37 -0700 <coinyon> @econoar @Rewkang @mrjasonchoi For all those who want to know more about the upcoming fee burn, check EIP 1559: https://t.co/41kU3MdMHK | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1214226383221731328 2020-01-06 08:45:03 -0700 <WilsonWithiam> 3/ Beyond facilitating the switch to ETH 2.0, proponents think keeping the bomb in check forces node operators to keep their clients up to date & can incentivize miners to accept upgrades with block reward reductions (see: @VitalikButerin and @econoar's EIP 1559) | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1214623761590304781 2020-01-07 11:04:06 -0700 <dmihal> @antiprosynth @dytfin @laurashin @alpackaP @hosseeb Proof of Stake and EIP1559 are awesome, but they're hypothetical. That's why I said ETH has the potential to be better than BTC, but it hasn't reached that point yet. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1215390701715886086 2020-01-09 13:51:38 -0700 <scott_lew_is> @dao_chairman EIP-1559 is a good start in the right direction. | 1 replies 2 retweets 23 likes | |
| 1215393512083968000 2020-01-09 14:02:48 -0700 <night_ivy> Yes exactly. We need EIP 1559. Gas should not all flow back to Miners, some of it needs to burn. | 0 replies 1 retweets 14 likes | |
| 1215415390089515008 2020-01-09 15:29:44 -0700 <ChainLinkGod> @dao_chairman @scott_lew_is Currently? It goes to the miner(s) of the block your transaction was in With EIP1559 a portion of it will be permanently burned | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1215426639011643393 2020-01-09 16:14:26 -0700 <scott_lew_is> @cyber_hokie eip-1559 for now. i dont think there is time for much more that before staking starts. | 0 replies 0 retweets 10 likes | |
| 1215426759430197248 2020-01-09 16:14:55 -0700 <scott_lew_is> @kacperwikiel i think eip-1559 is moving along. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1215699272416595969 2020-01-10 10:17:47 -0700 <scott_lew_is> @TheStalwart thats completely wrong. i can explain, and im sure you will get it, bc analogous mechanism exist in traditional finance. have you read how coin burning in the context of ethereum works? (mainly via eip-1559, a proposal to change the protocol) | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1215753294477324288 2020-01-10 13:52:27 -0700 <jemenger> Do you have any feedback about the EIP-1559 implementation in geth by Vulkanize? Post it to this @EthMagicians discussion. https://t.co/2WTsR557fa | 0 replies 8 retweets 14 likes | |
| 1216571696750026753 2020-01-12 20:04:29 -0700 <edmundedgar> How much gas should a typical Ethereum block be hard-coded to use? #eip1559 | 2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1216946634841632776 2020-01-13 20:54:22 -0700 <trent_vanepps> @edmundedgar i think this is leaving out some context, some people might not be familiar with how EIP 1559 operates in this regard. network norms would of course agree this should not be hard-coded | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1216967227255087105 2020-01-13 22:16:11 -0700 <CCassets> そしてEIP1559は、デフレとインフレをコントロールし得る。 ネットワークの利用が過熱するとデフレ傾向になってSoV性を高めて抑制する、 ネットワークの利用が鈍化するとインフレ傾向になって利用を促進する。 実体経済で人間が判断しているようなことが、プロトコルで定義できるわけやん？ | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1216976720802091009 2020-01-13 22:53:55 -0700 <gaxiiiiiiiiiiii> EIP1559とな | 1 replies 1 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1217134840233046017 2020-01-14 09:22:13 -0700 <evan_van_ness> #MuchClicked * @EliBenSasson zk universe * @AttestantIO eth2 validator costs * @OrchidProtocol decentralized VPN launch * @jessewldn progressive decentralization * @IoKomgo 700m trade finance volume * @IanSNorden EIP1559 implementation * @BrianBrooksCB crypto regulation themes | 0 replies 7 retweets 9 likes | |
| 1217180775663034368 2020-01-14 12:24:45 -0700 <ncchan93> @DriguezAdrien @crypt0snews Eip 1559 coming with 2.0 most likely. Which means lower TX fees for network usage, burns some eth out of existence, and much lower annual issuance. Win win win | 2 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1217568201107804164 2020-01-15 14:04:15 -0700 <CoastalDegen> @therealwhodunit @Madbreaks @sk_yy7 @AdamScochran Also worth noting eth doesnt have the best tokenonmics at present. This is changing with PoS (2.0 phase 1 launching first half this year) and EIP 1559 will also add an additional fee burn. These two combined + value capture of a rapidly developing ecosystem should shake this up. | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1217649914810970112 2020-01-15 19:28:57 -0700 <iamDCinvestor> @C2DaJMan @IslandHunting Proposals like EIP-1559 on Ethereum, maintaining issuance but allowing for fee burn, are way more responsible and sustainable. Repeatedly slashing issuance makes for a great meme, but it makes for a terrible security guarantees in perpetuity. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1217889377868636160 2020-01-16 11:20:29 -0700 <econoar> This will likely happen in eth1 as well with recent progress made on eip-1559. | 3 replies 0 retweets 26 likes | |
| 1217902180956549121 2020-01-16 12:11:22 -0700 <josephjpeters> @crypt0snews Then add in issuance being cut with the move to PoS and actual inflation being reduced as usage increases (EIP1559).... | 0 replies 0 retweets 7 likes | |
| 1217967059302137856 2020-01-16 16:29:10 -0700 <ProficieNtOCE> @econoar What's the best place to follow for EIP-1559 updates? | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1218063175637176321 2020-01-16 22:51:06 -0700 <TheCryptoTrans> @econoar Estimated ETA on a mainnet implementation of EIP-1559? If you had to honestly guess. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1218264318296260609 2020-01-17 12:10:22 -0700 <Badboybubby5> @stunad620 @crypt0snews @I_AmCrypto_King Oh bitcoiner...What happens when proof of stake comes in issuance goes to 1-2% per year due to not having to fund large wasteful mining farms and EIP 1559 comes in and inflation effectively goes to zero . Looks a lot better then a security budget that is halved every year . | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1218326811962003456 2020-01-17 16:18:42 -0700 <clint_ethwood> Bitcoin will still grow, and might even lead this next bull market, but expecting it to grow faster than Ethereum is not a safe assumption. If you ignore DeFi, EIP-1559, staking and the ever increasing utility of the network at this point, you're burying your head in the sand. | 0 replies 4 retweets 10 likes | |
| 1218803971633975296 2020-01-18 23:54:45 -0700 <santiagoroel> @jacobkostecki I think ETH accrues value (esp. w/ EIP 1559) as DeFi grows and network bandwidth utilization increases. Also, Plaid has good lock in & value prop but 50x revenue...🙄 price is not necessarily indicative of value accrual mechanism | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1219015473746059266 2020-01-19 13:55:11 -0700 <DeFiDaJo> @ConsenSysAcad @twigwam @prylabs The deflationary aspect when coupled with eip-1559 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1219632010899132418 2020-01-21 06:45:05 -0700 <nanexcool> Account abstraction is more important to me right now than whatever else may be coming to Ethereum 1.x (ok, maaaaaybe EIP-1559). Where the hell is PAYGAS opcode?!?!? Can I help? Can @MolochDAO help? I'm lighting the beacons 🔥 https://t.co/oFSaDG7a0u | 7 replies 7 retweets 57 likes | |
| 1219643071081721863 2020-01-21 07:29:02 -0700 <pedrouid> Agreed!👌Both EIP-859 (account abstraction) and EIP-1559 (fee market change) would improve Ethereum UX dramatically! | 2 replies 2 retweets 32 likes | |
| 1219686620015792129 2020-01-21 10:22:05 -0700 <ChazSchmidt> @ChrisBlec They aren't buying BTC to secure that trustless peg. They are buying ETH. That ETH is then off the market and cannot be used to pay fees. Unless ETH has been completely abtracted away and EIP1559 never starts burning, there will always be technical or economic friction IMO | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1219732899873927168 2020-01-21 13:25:59 -0700 <aliatiia_> EIP1559 aims to minimize fee market inefficiency by regulating the *supply* side in-protocol (cost of block space thru auto-adjusted `BASEFEE`). What if, instead, it does so by maximizing market *information*: create an actual fee market by tokenizing gas Cc @VitalikButerin | 2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1219732905561329666 2020-01-21 13:26:00 -0700 <aliatiia_> EIP1559: https://t.co/CrXWW5nxJu | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1219740507028455425 2020-01-21 13:56:13 -0700 <aliatiia_> Oh and the fee burning part of EIP1559 can be moved into its own EIP and modeled/implemented/tested seperately Cc @econoar | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1219894398428700672 2020-01-22 00:07:43 -0700 <edmundedgar> We aggravate this problem if we start burning miners' fees, a la EIP1559. Losing fees makes the security worst-case worse, so we'd need a higher block reward to compensate, resulting in more ETH issuance, not less | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1219895128078176256 2020-01-22 00:10:37 -0700 <edmundedgar> What we could do instead is fix the fee market like EIP1559 does, but instead of burning most of the fees, put them in a pool shared among all miners (not just the guy who mined the block they were in). That way we can secure the network with transaction fees even if $ETH drops. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1219970425498763265 2020-01-22 05:09:50 -0700 <RyanSAdams> Two main resource consumers on Ethereum: 1) Economic Bandwidth consumers (ETH) 2) Blockspace consumers (gas) Different stakeholders. Notice DyDx is the only project to appear on both lists 1 is most aligned w/ ETH holders & network security EIP1559 aligns 2 w/ needs of 1 🔥 https://t.co/zi4LgKzzxB | 1 replies 3 retweets 29 likes | |
| 1220052407310110720 2020-01-22 10:35:36 -0700 <ChainLinkGod> @antiprosynth @1971Bubble @defipulse PoS will greatly lower issuance (even lower than BTC after this year's halvening) and EIP1559 will burn a portion of TX fees so issuance might even be negative! | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1220429586795843585 2020-01-23 11:34:22 -0700 <trent_vanepps> @TrustlessState @takenstheorem @panekkkk you mean gas limit, as in the max size a block can be, related to # of tx and measured in bytes. it's been stable since jan '18. gas limit has only changed ~10x under EIP 1559, GL would def change more https://t.co/n32ptj1Xa1 https://t.co/DghvMu4xqS | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1220452991423209488 2020-01-23 13:07:22 -0700 <davidiach> Hey @econoar, is there a website where I can track how much ETH would have been burned if EIP-1559 had been implemented? | 1 replies 1 retweets 13 likes | |
| 1220703479032963072 2020-01-24 05:42:43 -0700 <TimBeiko> As you can see, the agenda is *packed*: UNGAS, networking upgrades, time based upgrades, precompiles, EVM changes, RPC, and, just maybe, EIP-1559! See you soon 👋🏻📺 https://t.co/qeMlVurCoC | 1 replies 1 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1220724798168403970 2020-01-24 07:07:26 -0700 <CCassets> インフレ率の極めて低い（0.数%）トークンディストリビューションモデル（EIP1559によるfeeBurnも併用）で、利回り5%~前後って、 コモディティの常識を変える価値提案だと思う。 Ethereumは暗号通貨の次の時代を先導できると思う。 | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1220747062167461888 2020-01-24 08:35:54 -0700 <TimBeiko> @jasoncarver @shemnon @EthMagicians @MolochDAO Then we had a quick conversation about EIP-1559. None of the champions were on the call, but @JHancock brought up a potential attack vector where miners could collude to adjust the BASEFEE and tip in their favor over time. | 1 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1220776947271245825 2020-01-24 10:34:39 -0700 <anapheys> 3/ That's why I'm pro Ethereum EIP 1559. Creates a true burn on all ETH transactions. @TrustlessState https://t.co/zMlVFUfOiI | 0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1220781380872933376 2020-01-24 10:52:16 -0700 <DeFiDaJo> @twobitidiot @scott_lew_is Interestingly, this is why eip-1559 is a critical component for scaling Ethereum | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1220787810036113408 2020-01-24 11:17:49 -0700 <ChainLinkGod> @TheBankOfLumi @twobitidiot @scott_lew_is Currently it's #DeFi, ~3% of all circulating $ETH has already been locked up, PoS will also lock up more $ETH, and EIP1559 will burn some of the $ETH used for gas, value accrual won't be a problem in the long run, but I agree adoption is key for this to work https://t.co/pBIpa5OWM4 | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1221209335239282689 2020-01-25 15:12:49 -0700 <ChazSchmidt> @bitdvd For the record, I like what the @renprotocol team is building. It's just my personal belief that Bitcoin has ceded smart contracts etc. to Ethereum and if things don't change BTC will also cede its "SoV" to ETH (EIP1559+Staking+min issuance). Ask the many corps building on ETH. | 1 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1221932533027307527 2020-01-27 15:06:32 -0700 <TrustlessState> Can’t wait for a 3rd green column to be added here with EIP 1559: ETH burn rate. | 2 replies 11 retweets 75 likes | |
| 1221970386973347841 2020-01-27 17:36:58 -0700 <_Checkmatey_> @TrustlessState EIP1559 feels like - A game rigged by holders of today - A game rigged against future holders - At odds with non-staking users - Headed for inaccessible fees in $ - Yet another monetary experiment - A recognition that ETH in its current form is not attractive for value accrual. | 3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1221971142539382785 2020-01-27 17:39:58 -0700 <TrustlessState> @_Checkmatey_ EIP 1559 is a mechanism that specifically returns value to non-stakers. I write about this in my article on Wednesday and also here: https://t.co/apZdALwlkf It really doesn't feel like much of an expirment. It's just burning instead of paying ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1221972074064990208 2020-01-27 17:43:40 -0700 <TrustlessState> @_Checkmatey_ I'm not sure you understand the economics behind it. EIP 1559 won't make fees more expensive. Burning won't make fees more expensive. The only thing that makes fees more expensive is congestion. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1221979999974019072 2020-01-27 18:15:09 -0700 <VitalikButerin> @SDLerner @jadler0 @cyber_hokie @_JohnWhelan @Blockstream Being the most neutral base asset for apps on the ethereum platform, plus txfees part burned though EIP 1559 part given to stakers | 0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1222075509275840518 2020-01-28 00:34:41 -0700 <dnsvckvc> @TrustlessState @_Checkmatey_ I too think EIP 1559 is a mistake. It shifts returns from stakers to all token holders, thereby makes DeFi returns even more attractive compared to staking | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1222077499951276032 2020-01-28 00:42:35 -0700 <_Checkmatey_> @dnsvckvc @TrustlessState I disagree with that take. EIP1559 just creates the same baseline. If everyone benefits, it is just the new zero. Stakers continue to benefit from burn AND block rewards. Stakers will thus be able to afford fees (constant ETH inflows) whilst average users get priced out. | 2 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1222107047824478208 2020-01-28 02:40:00 -0700 <VitalikButerin> @AdamScochran I actually think that despite being platform-security-first ETH has a quite fine "monetary policy" 🤣 Social norm: "minimum necessary issuance" Implementation now: 2 ETH per block, ~4.7m/year Implementation in ETH2: k * sqrt(eth_staked) - eip_1559_burn, theoretical max ~2m/year | 6 replies 17 retweets 104 likes | |
| 1222123090072743937 2020-01-28 03:43:45 -0700 <_Checkmatey_> @TrustlessState @dnsvckvc It just sets a new zero. Stakers can more easily afford fees to capitalise on DeFi opportunities and increase capital. Non stakers have the opposite problem. They much consider the repercussions of the 'wire transfer' fee before engaging. EIP1559 leads to stakers == bankers | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1222188735833485313 2020-01-28 08:04:36 -0700 <TonyIJArthur> EIP-1559 ! | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1222541050188894208 2020-01-29 07:24:34 -0700 <TrustlessState> There are other Equity Characteristics as well! - The BASEFEE of EIP 1559 is a Stock-Buyback mechanism. Stronger revenue from block-space sale generates more funds for stock-buybacks! | 1 replies 0 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1222808710151647232 2020-01-30 01:08:09 -0700 <Ethereum_John> @parman_the @bitcoinpasada @danheld @madcapslaugh Eth locked in DeFi acts as a SoV and reduces available supply. When locked in makerdao, creates Dai stablecoin =MoE and UoA= better $. EIP1559 to burn eth w every txn. Also staking to ⬇️ issuance (below BTC’s) + ⬆️ lockup. Many ways to lockup eth. All add scarcity to supply 📈 | 2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1222813101369675777 2020-01-30 01:25:36 -0700 <Tetranode> @parman_the @bitcoinpasada @danheld @madcapslaugh Your math is wrong. A percentage of people using it for utility will stick to it as a store of value. This is not even taking into account the EIP-1559 bonfire... Sounds like Ethereum keeps you up at night, want to dump BTC for ETH? | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1222988235175010305 2020-01-30 13:01:31 -0700 <RyanSAdams> Bank stablecoins like USDC aren't parasitic to ETH True they don't use ETH as economic bandwidth, but they also don't require Ethereum-level security They do use blockspace, which increases ETH scarcity (EIP-1559) They also attract Ethereum users, some of whom buy ETH Net win | 3 replies 8 retweets 82 likes | |
| 1222998842351726592 2020-01-30 13:43:40 -0700 <DeFiDaJo> @Tetranode @parman_the @bitcoinpasada @danheld @madcapslaugh What’s the latest on the timeframe for eip1559 implementation? | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1223093421126176768 2020-01-30 19:59:30 -0700 <DeFiDaJo> Combined with the repercussions of eip-1559 👉 game over | 1 replies 0 retweets 9 likes | |
| 1223195540189409280 2020-01-31 02:45:17 -0700 <TheCryptoTrans> @DeFiDaJo When is EIP-1559 or a simplified version of it going to be implemented in an upgrade? Thanks. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1223226290863595520 2020-01-31 04:47:28 -0700 <epick362> @kingcappuccinos @ncchan93 @RyanWatkins_ @MakerDAO @Tether_to @PaxosStandard @Gemini @centre_io @TrustToken @ethereum @MessariCrypto Owning Ether is equal to owning a stake in the success of Ethereum. Gas fees are paid in Ether and once EIP-1559 some of the fees also get burnt. Stablecoins need Ether, therefore the value of Ether will increase as its scarcity increases. | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1223645520255733765 2020-02-01 08:33:20 -0700 <DeFiDaJo> @AnselLindner @ck_SNARKs With the reducing inflation turning deflationary, loss of liquidity from staking, burns from eip-1559, there actually might be a problem where eth continually accrues value at an exponential rate | 2 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1223955062558482433 2020-02-02 05:03:21 -0700 <Status004> Imagine having doubts on $ETH capital inflows without even consider -#defi supply-demand ratio implications -cryptoeconomics model changes(eip 1559 eth burn) -structural changes(pos) - intrinsic eth ecosystem authenticity @ethereum | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1224040124738088962 2020-02-02 10:41:21 -0700 <Greaves1704> @AmsterdamMaste1 @tayvano_ @antiprosynth Net issuance could be net zero or deflationary if you include EIP-1559. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1224188563140464641 2020-02-02 20:31:12 -0700 <ChainLinkGod> @balwiles Good question, besides staking I believe DeFi will suck up a lot of circulating ETH, there's currently already 3% of entire supply locked in DeFi! I believe this number will only grow, and add ontop of that EIP1559 fee burning, issuance could even end up being negative https://t.co/m4fTKBZFDz | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1224403285538496514 2020-02-03 10:44:26 -0700 <meeseeking> @theog__ @econoar Once PoS finality happens, before Phase 1 of ETH 2 so sometime in the next 18mos, issuance starts to drop towards < 1%. And then w EIP-1559, all fees get BURNT. It should effectively lead to supply being capped and ranging from -1% to 1% growth per year. Minimal viable issuance. | 1 replies 0 retweets 6 likes | |
| 1224403442510303238 2020-02-03 10:45:03 -0700 <meeseeking> @rektonomicon @econoar Once PoS finality happens, before Phase 1 of ETH 2 so sometime in the next 18mos, issuance starts to drop towards < 1%. And then w EIP-1559, all fees get BURNT. It should effectively lead to supply being capped and ranging from -1% to 1% growth per year. Minimal viable issuance. | 0 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1224561194306097157 2020-02-03 21:11:54 -0700 <0x_____________> @DefiCustody @kaiynne Gas will be burned with EIP 1559 | 1 replies 1 retweets 10 likes | |
| 1224632042295525377 2020-02-04 01:53:26 -0700 <hugofirefreire> @BijanMassoumi @ChainLinkGod @CdennehyChris @0x_____________ @DefiCustody @kaiynne “As an alternative, EIP-1559 proposes a BASEFEE, which would make the experience of paying for transaction fees so much smoother.” https://t.co/VT8pvZ5FoB | 0 replies 0 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1224681031879491584 2020-02-04 05:08:06 -0700 <DeFiDaJo> EIP-1559 is a critical catalyst that will launch $eth to ATH. This + Eth2 mechanics yields a DEFLATIONARY economic model that, unlike btc’s 21m cap, doesn’t weaken network security. Once this is widely understood the price ramifications will be insane. + privacy: @aztecprotocol | 2 replies 22 retweets 75 likes | |
| 1224684658463596544 2020-02-04 05:22:30 -0700 <swap_psycho> Central banks planning to use and build CBDCs on Ethereum would be great. EIP 1559 will burn Eth, essentially paying a tax to every Eth holder by making it more scarce. Feel free to promote your centralized shit coin on Eth. It'll just make us richer. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1224696843034075136 2020-02-04 06:10:55 -0700 <PhABCD> @sassal0x @kaiynne @econoar I would be really interested in hearing what you have to say about EIP-1559 @tarunchitra. I'm particularly interested in miners behaviors with this fee scheme. Will they coordinate and force the basefee to be low and tips to be higher? | 2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1224703060729049088 2020-02-04 06:35:38 -0700 <ShadySlimFast> @caltrades_ EIP 1559, https://t.co/eTn4ind8va Most stuff kinda old but its still in this doc here so I think its on the way still. | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1224709753160466432 2020-02-04 07:02:13 -0700 <econoar> @ShadySlimFast @caltrades_ Yup, eip1559 is for eth1 side. It’s also in eth2 phase 1. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1224722416535912449 2020-02-04 07:52:33 -0700 <0xTycoon> @PhABCD @sassal0x @kaiynne @econoar @tarunchitra In EIP-1559, gas block limit voting is scrapped & instead the miners must target 8 million. The BF is based on how congested the network is. The BF increments are constrained too, making it predictable between blocks - big win for wallet UX! | 2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1224773805547118593 2020-02-04 11:16:45 -0700 <mr_ligi> @nicksdjohnson I fully agree - really sad to read stuff like this. Still think EIP-1559 is a great idea and would improve ethereum UX. | 1 replies 0 retweets 6 likes | |
| 1224774764889284608 2020-02-04 11:20:33 -0700 <PhABCD> @nicksdjohnson @nicksdjohnson What do you think the following concern regarding EIP-1559? It feels like with some moderate amount of coordination, miners could push the BASEFEE down to favor tipping, which would defeat the purpose of the EIP. https://t.co/TifB20qpOe | 2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1224787889684246528 2020-02-04 12:12:43 -0700 <econoar> If you're interested in EIP-1559 or have questions/concerns about it, try to direct discussion to the following thread. A lot of the discussion I see taking place this week has already been covered. https://t.co/OhwrCEn1jA | 3 replies 7 retweets 31 likes | |
| 1224790696013508609 2020-02-04 12:23:52 -0700 <spencernoon> Simple, elegant value capture. This is coming to ETH soon with EIP-1559. | 5 replies 7 retweets 47 likes | |
| 1224855821592465408 2020-02-04 16:42:39 -0700 <DeFiDaJo> @spencernoon @TrustlessState Not implementing eip1559 would be a calamitous disaster. It must be implemented | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1224860635546079232 2020-02-04 17:01:46 -0700 <DefiMoon> @factcheckmypost @ChrisBlec Eth will have minimal, maybe even 0 inflation soon after EIP 1559 https://t.co/YLNAP3hoHX | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1224868438566326272 2020-02-04 17:32:47 -0700 <edmundedgar> @CarlGocht @spencernoon Currently miners get paid more from the bidding war that occurs when blocks are full. If EIP1559 functions as intended they will no longer get this extra money, because the base fee, which they don't get, will regulate demand so that blocks don't become full. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1224875036600762368 2020-02-04 17:59:00 -0700 <Tetranode> @sassal0x @RyanSAdams I find #MKR fits the gold narrative better than $ETH. It's effectively a dwindling supply right now. ... one day ETH may become digital gold, that day is after the 1.x chain migrates to 2.x, and we see negative inflation via EIP-1559. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1224892314251714561 2020-02-04 19:07:39 -0700 <kaiynne> @SpartanBlack_1 ETH (EIP-1559) | 1 replies 0 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1224983174754766849 2020-02-05 01:08:42 -0700 <Crypto_Briefing> A recent proposal (EIP 1559) from @VitalikButerin and @econoar proposes that a portion of the fees sent to #Ethereum miners should be burned. The recommendation would benefit all ETH holders by way of cutting the overall supply. https://t.co/jNCiEPAPKf | 0 replies 5 retweets 14 likes | |
| 1225142503495651329 2020-02-05 11:41:49 -0700 <TrustlessState> ETH Locked in DeFi ✅ Staking ⭕️ EIP 1559 ⭕️ Sub-0.5% Issuance ⭕️ Only one of Ether's value-capture mechanisms currently is live. $200 ETH reflects 1/4 pretty well. | 1 replies 11 retweets 83 likes | |
| 1225163423513706497 2020-02-05 13:04:57 -0700 <FigoETH> @Mouhakami881 @crypt0snews Soon Ethereums issuance will not only be lower than Bitcoins, but it's supply will also be declining (not only be capped) due to lockup in DeFi, staking in ETH 2.0 and fee burn by EIP-1559. Far better SoV mid-longterm. https://t.co/uvT2uEAJGD | 4 replies 6 retweets 25 likes | |
| 1225164116190359552 2020-02-05 13:07:42 -0700 <Ride0rDai> @TrustlessState With EIP 1559 ETH will become the web stack’s digital oil - being consumed for every transaction. https://t.co/EdgQn6wzGd | 0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1225220547841331201 2020-02-05 16:51:56 -0700 <BitcoinGeo> $ETH #Ethereum is going to fucking pump so hard once EIP 1559 burning mechanism gets released this year with ETH 2.0 ! @VitalikButerin @econoar 🤟🚀🚀 https://t.co/QlCjsXxwnY | 0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1225237431991054336 2020-02-05 17:59:02 -0700 <CindiKit> Tipers. com Domain Available https://t.co/ahgZmpjTa7 #Ethereum #EIP1559 #Blockchain #Constantinople #Ether #SmartContracts #ERC20 #Ganache #Truffle #Hyperledger #Solidity #Parity #Bitcoin #BusinessBlockchain #BlockchainForBusiness #defi #staking #pos #basefee #eip #eth #mining https://t.co/Z1BoYpCUyr | 0 replies 1 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1225262890237583360 2020-02-05 19:40:11 -0700 <DaveLevine0com> @DoveyWan Digital oil is not the narrative. Burning ETH is only one use. It is also staked as a capital asset that earns income and it's an SOV once POS with EIP-1559 makes it a deflationary money with lower overall issuance than Bitcoin! (Issuance from staking = burning from tx fees) | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1225285983324651520 2020-02-05 21:11:57 -0700 <Zima_Crypto> A very good explanation of Ethereum's upcoming EIP-1559 that will cause ETH to be burned on every transaction, counteracting inflation: https://t.co/5vVNTjr4L1 | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1225328769809838080 2020-02-06 00:01:58 -0700 <gldnXross> Is #EIP1559 (ETH burns for every transaction) news starting to be priced into $ETH? | 4 replies 4 retweets 21 likes | |
| 1225338883740700672 2020-02-06 00:42:10 -0700 <CHalexov2016> BTW ALL! You need to understand that $eth #ethereum future Circulation supply may never go over 110-112milion after @ethereum upgrade 100% on ETH2 with great proposal by @econoar best EIP 1559 as gas/fee burning sistem! The real burning 🪐🤝 Milions/bilions transacions coming.. https://t.co/uj2Eikvgc9 | 1 replies 0 retweets 6 likes | |
| 1225346083829796864 2020-02-06 01:10:46 -0700 <CHalexov2016> EIP 1559: The Final Puzzle-Piece to Ethereum’s Monetary Policy https://t.co/HE5nkGaQSq | 0 replies 1 retweets 6 likes | |
| 1225357931559800833 2020-02-06 01:57:51 -0700 <edmundedgar> PS Fee market reform a la EIP1559 might increase total fees, which might be good, but you can do it without the burn, it'll probably work better | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1225358770395635719 2020-02-06 02:01:11 -0700 <FlyGuyInTheSky> A must watch... EIP1559 and the effects it will have on $Eth give the video time or scroll forward. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1225377866071887872 2020-02-06 03:17:04 -0700 <FlyGuyInTheSky> @MarkHannaBTC Keep dreaming.... $Etc only got to $46 when $Eth was $1432 ... people are speculating on Etc to accumulate Eth 😉 look up #EIP1559 #Eth32POS Noobs like to buy whole tokens it makes them feel good and rich. | 1 replies 1 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1225421431640645632 2020-02-06 06:10:11 -0700 <RyanBerckmans> Here's a new essay where I try to explain why Eth1.5 will have a huge, positive impact on the price of ETH. And why burning gas in EIP-1559 won't. https://t.co/Osx5dqPBrr | 3 replies 10 retweets 63 likes | |
| 1225421874550726656 2020-02-06 06:11:56 -0700 <_Checkmatey_> @krugman25 @sassal0x If it was a guarantee that 2.0 ships, EIP 1559 works as designed and Ethereum had already achieved sound money candidate status, the price would be 10x today right? Why isn't it? Risk and uncertainty. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1225424860479774721 2020-02-06 06:23:48 -0700 <Ride0rDai> @_dwasse @antiprosynth EIP 1559 will solidify the demand for ETH and make ethereum just as “deflationary” as bitcoin if not even more. https://t.co/ETFVKHIbhL | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1225425069012389890 2020-02-06 06:24:38 -0700 <davidiach> @RyanBerckmans You only make the case that EIP-1559 won’t have an impact on the *market cap* of ETH. But if the market cap stays the same even though some ETH gets burned, it follows that the price of ETH will go up in that scenario. | 2 replies 0 retweets 8 likes | |
| 1225425781360386048 2020-02-06 06:27:28 -0700 <tokenstate> Regarding ETH price it should go right back up to last summer's high just under $400, consolidate then break upwards towards ATH consolidate Then make new highs into next year. I'd be very surprised if the ATH isn't taken out within 6 months from now Once EIP-1559 🔥 goes live. | 3 replies 1 retweets 24 likes | |
| 1225448178176155651 2020-02-06 07:56:28 -0700 <CHalexov2016> Ethereum’s EIP-1559, Eth2, and the price of ETH - Ryan Berckmans - Medium https://t.co/TqDlqq1O7p | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1225450318370082827 2020-02-06 08:04:58 -0700 <Status004> EIP 1559 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1225494502154129408 2020-02-06 11:00:32 -0700 <Blockchain_Bane> @gldnXross You got a quick Tweet sized summary of #EIP1559? & is it releasing with ETH 2.0 this summer? | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1225557465716154368 2020-02-06 15:10:44 -0700 <TrustlessState> @RyanBerckmans @PlanetaOTC @edmundedgar Where is this belief that EIP 1559 increases total fee cost coming from | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1225570370905919488 2020-02-06 16:02:01 -0700 <RyanBerckmans> 8/ EIP 1559 is awesome. Burning fees is awesome. I support burning fees. But, we shouldn't expect the act of burning fees to increase the market cap of ETH. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1225575878454804482 2020-02-06 16:23:54 -0700 <econoar> @RyanBerckmans @edmundedgar @TrustlessState Everyone has focused on the fee burn aspect of eip1559 but that’s not the main intention of the eip at all. The core goal is to fix the atrocious UX for the current fee market. Also, having known/set issuance (security) is much more valuable than relying on variable fees. | 4 replies 0 retweets 9 likes | |
| 1225585115801300992 2020-02-06 17:00:36 -0700 <TrustlessState> For those of you who think that Ethereum marketing doesn't work, @ChicoCrypto (72k subscribers) just made a video illustrating EIP 1559 and its impact on Ethereum's monetary policy with a video /w 20k views. The video clearly leveraged both mine and Erics articles about it. | 9 replies 15 retweets 163 likes | |
| 1225591780063825920 2020-02-06 17:27:05 -0700 <josephjpeters> @celiawan2 Crypto economics of ETH2 are interesting, particularly the dynamic nature of the issuance schedule based on staking participation combined with the new fee market proposal found in EIP1559. | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1225596244690644992 2020-02-06 17:44:49 -0700 <Syncubate> In this manner, #EthereumClassic's monetary policy would distinguish itself from both BTC and ETH... From BTC in the sense that transaction fee burning would be in play (ETH may implement this with EIP-1559). And from ETH in the sense that it would have a preset emission model. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1225638374729379841 2020-02-06 20:32:14 -0700 <veliko_test3> Burning gas in EIP-1559 will have no effect on the price of ETH. Getting rid of proof of work will have a huge, upward impact on the price of ETH! https://t.co/HMY8k8r11x | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1225645720788582401 2020-02-06 21:01:25 -0700 <FlyGuyInTheSky> This is the burn effect #EIP1559 🔥 One will have it the other won’t. Yes I know $etc has risen strongly but it’s amazing what the debate has highlighted. A scarcer $eth and that much quicker than anyone thought. https://t.co/gz0HPsEHBj | 2 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1225688115248939008 2020-02-06 23:49:53 -0700 <gphummer> @jdorman81 @Rewkang You're approaching it as a CFA charterholder studying abstract correlations and past performance rather than a forward-looking tech investor analyzing fundamentals. A few reasons ETH will outperform: EIP-1559, ETH 2.0, rollups, DeFi, continued network effect entrenchment, etc. | 3 replies 0 retweets 6 likes | |
| 1225701040281907200 2020-02-07 00:41:15 -0700 <edmundedgar> @koeppelmann Benefits: * Fix the fee market * You can still respond quickly like with the Shanghai gas limit cut, unlike current EIP1559 * Miners get reliably paid, protected against high tx value + low ETH value, which IMHO is very dangerous rn * If they play silly buggers we can spank them | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1225737704840757248 2020-02-07 03:06:56 -0700 <Teutonium> #Ethereum is evolving fast, and the possibilities for $ETH are changing too! EIP1559, PoS, DeFi https://t.co/c4p0qGyVzi #Steem $steem #crypto $btc | 0 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1225738635229700096 2020-02-07 03:10:38 -0700 <CHalexov2016> Real soon in 2020 we will see $eth #ethereum at last year ath price (350-360$) and overtake it. Btw i feel we will hit 250-300$ before in Q2 eth2 go live with POS 🤝 + EIP 1559 is coming in 2020! Real burn of coin🪐🤝✔️ see you at 500$ + btw DYOR + SUB -0.5% issuance 🪐 ETH2🏆 https://t.co/6cBfJL8AZK | 0 replies 0 retweets 6 likes | |
| 1225740012240564225 2020-02-07 03:16:06 -0700 <TokenJay> Ethereum EIP 1559 - near zero inflation with robust network security https://t.co/sV9bTvUOwT #CryptoCurrency (from Reddit) https://t.co/4lURvffNqS | 0 replies 1 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1225740071229325312 2020-02-07 03:16:20 -0700 <bitcoinagile> r/CryptoCurrency - #ethereum EIP 1559 - near zero inflation with robust network security #CryptoCurrency https://t.co/IiTSSPH6jC | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1225741770907979776 2020-02-07 03:23:06 -0700 <CryptoTraderPro> Ethereum EIP 1559 - near zero inflation with robust network security https://t.co/OsXUGPPiOz ⟶ via https://t.co/Ko6HQzkpz1 https://t.co/5KHJKVqWPR | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1225754423336542208 2020-02-07 04:13:22 -0700 <coincocoon> Ethereum EIP 1559 - near zero inflation with robust network security https://t.co/1IGThsPut9 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1225755020282519555 2020-02-07 04:15:44 -0700 <MrJ3NKS> @APompliano Defi Lockup + Staking + EIP 1559 = ETH 💥🚀 | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1225755902155862017 2020-02-07 04:19:15 -0700 <CryptoNDaily> Ethereum EIP 1559 - near zero inflation with robust network security /r/CryptoCurrency https://t.co/UEGRC7cfde https://t.co/YbYAiIk6Np | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1225764110857580544 2020-02-07 04:51:52 -0700 <librco> Ethereum EIP 1559 – near zero inflation with robust network security : CryptoCurrency https://t.co/pYvQKPmzAU | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1225768032783478785 2020-02-07 05:07:27 -0700 <crypto___king> Ethereum EIP 1559 - near zero inflation with robust network security #cryptoking | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1225773649321431040 2020-02-07 05:29:46 -0700 <_crypto_crack> Another interesting take around EIP-1559, also with good arguments in the replies. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1225803862298284038 2020-02-07 07:29:49 -0700 <TimBeiko> @mhswende @wighawag @greg_colvin @jbaylina @hudsonjameson @aztecprotocol @CodaProtocol @GuthL @StarkWareLtd @JHancock @ElectricCoinCo @gregthegreek @shemnon @alexberegszaszi I asked about EIP-1559. It's been updated to only require one fork vs. two. @JHancock says he'd like to see it run on testnets for a long time to before we include it in an upgrade. | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1225804279086243840 2020-02-07 07:31:29 -0700 <CryptoCurrNews> Ethereum EIP 1559 - near zero inflation with robust network security + https://t.co/JqW2hhLxhR #cryptocurrency #crypto #blockchain | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1225810389666955265 2020-02-07 07:55:46 -0700 <AndrewDARMACAP> @jdorman81 as a next generation decentralized World Wide Web. It will need $eth to for every computation and storage step. Also EIP-1559 will start the process of supply reduction. Also 95% of engineers build on @Ethereum. I respect your capital markets thinking, but your missing | 1 replies 2 retweets 31 likes | |
| 1225828453024444416 2020-02-07 09:07:32 -0700 <ledgermex> “EIP 1559: The Final Puzzle-Piece to Ethereum’s Monetary Policy” by @TrustlessState https://t.co/x393oXf4q4 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1225835377929273344 2020-02-07 09:35:03 -0700 <JHancock> @iamDCinvestor They would certainly be harder to maintain. We can also observe that it is happening under the EIP-1559 fee market. https://t.co/fskPiQVX51 | 1 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1225849235175804928 2020-02-07 10:30:07 -0700 <DastardlyDaniel> @MattAboody @TurnipShortLife This. ETH2 32 ETH neet node hype + lesser known changes coming like EIP1559. 6-7x to ATH and ETH has come a long way since then with more useful dApps being added every day. Easily $300-400 EOY | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1225885280059756547 2020-02-07 12:53:21 -0700 <QtBoris> Ethereum EIP 1559 - near zero inflation with robust network security https://t.co/Gp4FuoRvmG #development #blockchain #tech | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1225885610604482560 2020-02-07 12:54:40 -0700 <hudsonjameson> 1/ Update on EIP-1559 from my understanding (this is the EIP that changes the fee structure in ETH 1.0). @vulcanizeio has completed their implementation in geth and are updating the EIP to match the latest spec. It will still need to go through more scrutiny by core devs | 2 replies 22 retweets 94 likes | |
| 1225921384540336133 2020-02-07 15:16:49 -0700 <edmundedgar> @JHancock @pyskell @_prestwich @trent_vanepps EIP1559 hard-codes the gas limit and the protocol sets miner fees, rightly or wrongly there's not much left for them to game, unless they make a cartel | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1226045031724847104 2020-02-07 23:28:09 -0700 <FigoETH> @Evan_ss6 @jdorman81 @AndrewDARMACAP @ethereum I think on a risk adjusted basis ETH is currently very attractive. - Undervalued based on the fundamentals compared to other SC platforms / Bitcoin - Profits from every project building on top of it (EIP-1559 coming soon) - Thoughtful monetary policy (SoV) | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1226048181584056330 2020-02-07 23:40:40 -0700 <omynuts> @hudsonjameson @vulcanizeio maybe the real EIP-1559 was the friends me made along the way | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1226058392747245571 2020-02-08 00:21:14 -0700 <CryptoCurrNews> Ethereum EIP 1559 - near zero inflation with robust network security + https://t.co/JqW2hhLxhR #cryptocurrency #crypto #blockchain | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1226077506127761409 2020-02-08 01:37:11 -0700 <FigoETH> @svitekpavel Don't you think that at that point of time (imo earlier like 3-5 years) ETH position as SoV is more suitable than Bitcoins (Defi lockup, staking, EIP-1559 feeburn)? But perhaps as hedge against some ETH catastrophy ;-) | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1226079550100123653 2020-02-08 01:45:18 -0700 <pierrelepair> EIP-1559 + DEFI locked-in thru the roof. #ETH. Bullish | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1226164825992179713 2020-02-08 07:24:10 -0700 <DeFiDaJo> @iamDCinvestor @IslandHunting The eip-1559 factor is an absolute game changer as well | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1226243952858271744 2020-02-08 12:38:35 -0700 <CHalexov2016> Hey @VitalikButerin @ethereumJoseph @econoar @sassal0x and other.. what if you add some proposal to ETH2 that maybe 2,3 or 5% from burning gas/fee from EIP 1559 go into some Ethereum Charity and we can vote with wallets of pos who receive it from Charity list? Lets donate 🪐🪐 https://t.co/jQB2ZUCAr5 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1226275097423622149 2020-02-08 14:42:20 -0700 <DastardlyDaniel> @joejszabo @crunkinpillson Checkout EIP1559. ETH will end up with inflation near zero on ETH2. Additionally the staking reward tables/calculators you see don't account for the the tips validators can receive either. ETH/BTC will likely be at 28:1 or lower by EOY IMO LINK/ETH is a winning folio | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1226405397864570881 2020-02-08 23:20:07 -0700 <CHalexov2016> @IvanOnTech Come on guys only 32 $eth before eth2 go live. Please Ivan tell them about EIP 1559 too .. real ETH burn sistem 🤝🪐🪐🪐🪐 https://t.co/zu2KWIC4Pq | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1226449194749222912 2020-02-09 02:14:09 -0700 <CHalexov2016> @IvanOnTech Go go Ivan tell your followers.. only 32 $eth to hodl . Explain them eip 1559 🪐🤝 https://t.co/mhyurLblcD | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1226563017992699905 2020-02-09 09:46:26 -0700 <CHalexov2016> Eth2 will bring eip 1559 gas burn.. real coin burn. $eth | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1226592176966074368 2020-02-09 11:42:18 -0700 <CHalexov2016> Last year $eth #ethereum price 7th feb 2019 was 122$ and today 09. 02. 2020 is 227$ ! Last year ATH for eth was 360/370$ ... lets see what price will bring eth2 with pos (stakeing) and Eth gass burn eip 1559 🪐🤝 i feel 500$+ easy end of 2020 with bacon chain 🤝🪐✔️ https://t.co/vw6WEMo8RE | 0 replies 3 retweets 9 likes | |
| 1226683654509744129 2020-02-09 17:45:48 -0700 <blockchain_hub> 이더리움 2.0 과 가격 상승 이유 - EIP1559 : https://t.co/6TUuzareyg #ICOROOTS #블록체인허브 #비트코인전망 #비트코인시세 #가상화폐 #암호화폐 #블록체인 #비트코인 #이더리움 #ICO #코인마켓캡 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1226823878867025920 2020-02-10 03:03:00 -0700 <CHalexov2016> $eth #ethereum eth2 pos and eip 1559 will be interested! 🪐 | 0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1226833875328012288 2020-02-10 03:42:44 -0700 <CHalexov2016> Ethereum stakeing #pos is coming! + #defi and eip1559 coin burn sistem! Ethereum circulation supply will dump in future! 🪐✔️ | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1226933131242065922 2020-02-10 10:17:08 -0700 <trent_vanepps> @fin2thepeople oh, yes EIP 1559. yup, it's definitely legit. see the latest pull request here: https://t.co/jy3JfY4hn2 | 0 replies 0 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1227262305219399680 2020-02-11 08:05:09 -0700 <ethhub_io> EthHub Weekly Recap #100 🥳 -DeFi hits $1bn -SEC commissioner proposes 3yr safe harbor for ICOs -@PoolTogether_ raises $1mn -EIP-1559 update -@Dharma_HQ introduces dToken -@daveytea creates first collateral swap -@trent_vanepps top 5 eth2 misconceptions https://t.co/n8TE8Kt62w | 2 replies 8 retweets 38 likes | |
| 1227276669293146112 2020-02-11 09:02:14 -0700 <veliko_test3> Into the Ether - EthHub Weekly #100: $1bn in DeFi, Eth2 AMA, 3-year SEC safe harbor, PoolTogether raises $1mn, EIP-1559 update, Dharma introduces dToken, first collateral swap on Ethereum and top 5 eth2 misconceptions https://t.co/WfpeIHnT8G | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1227285308913410049 2020-02-11 09:36:34 -0700 <0xMidnight> @AFDudley0 You ask how stakers make money given inflation, suggesting active participation is a requirement for retaining your purchasing power, but given eth2's issuance mechanism and Vulcanize's work on implementing EIP-1559 it seems to be a very different situation than, say, Tezos. | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1227293514137866240 2020-02-11 10:09:10 -0700 <AFDudley0> @0xMidnight EIP-1559 is pretty complicated in how it relates to this stuff, the relationship it has to ETH2 is quite subtle. I think Vitalik's suggestion of having no inflation at all in ETH2 is more relevant :D I think Tezos should look to stop printing coins as well.... | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1227331265822679041 2020-02-11 12:39:11 -0700 <EthfinanceR> Into the Ether - EthHub Weekly #100: $1bn in DeFi, Eth2 AMA, 3-year SEC safe harbor, PoolTogether raises $1mn, EIP-1559 update, Dharma introduces dToken, first collateral swap on Ethereum and top 5 eth2 misconceptions via /r/ethfinance https://t.co/O3slux8w0n $ETH #Ethereum #Et… | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1227529695429877760 2020-02-12 01:47:40 -0700 <Dexter_Valkyrie> Just keep "EIP-1559" on your handle as a constant reminder not to sell at $1,500. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1227539679244763137 2020-02-12 02:27:20 -0700 <0xTycoon> @antiprosynth @jaybny I agree. Also with inflation below %1 and EIP-1559 in ETH 2.0, then there's really no argument 😉 | 0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1227596350302322689 2020-02-12 06:12:32 -0700 <Teutonium> @IamCryptoWolf You only need to know two things atm to be more bullish... DeFi pulse and EIP1559 BTW check out the ETHBTC chart on the monthly, MACD seems to be starting to roll up and we might see a bullish cross mid 2020 | 0 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1227651539071897602 2020-02-12 09:51:50 -0700 <weedcoder> @gillesCadignan @AlbinCAUDERLIER eip-1559 | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1227705570775457796 2020-02-12 13:26:32 -0700 <CHalexov2016> Eth2 is coming and $eth price keep rise. Soon we will see #pos and #defi lock over 50% of ethereum and eip1559 bring 0 inflation in ETH. 🪐🪐🪐🪐🪐🪐🪐🪐 https://t.co/IJ3Q4sed1N | 1 replies 1 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1227717428559466496 2020-02-12 14:13:39 -0700 <_M_1_k_3_> @iExecMonopoly @CryptoOddish A lot of hodlers are gonna suffer from EIP-1559. Not eth hodlers of course 😁 | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1227726711111999489 2020-02-12 14:50:32 -0700 <DeFiDaJo> EIP-1559 is the btc killer Eth2.0 is the btc killer Use cases is the btc killer DeFi is the btc killer Enterprise adoption is the btc killer ... | 3 replies 8 retweets 59 likes | |
| 1227801358461538304 2020-02-12 19:47:09 -0700 <andrew_bakst> When is EIP-1559 being implemented? | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1227850780066975745 2020-02-12 23:03:32 -0700 <CHalexov2016> Btw @EthereumDenver is coming. 24h left. Stock some $eth #ethereum before its add some more $ in price. Why pay over 300-400$ if you can buy under 300$ . Eth2 is coming! Eip1559 aka Eth burn gas is coming, pos aka stakeing is coming, 160k tps coming, onemiliondevs coming..2020 🪐 | 1 replies 1 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1228015144145506304 2020-02-13 09:56:40 -0700 <Teutonium> @FJ_Kirk @Foobazzler @antiprosynth @spencernoon @tzstats I'm right now building my $ETH bag up... after it I might go for some Tezos since I do like the progress, I do however, think that the tokenomics need to be worked a lot, maybe get a burn mechanism in the tx fees like ETH wants to implement with EIP1559, that would be rly good | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1228057587536412673 2020-02-13 12:45:19 -0700 <scupytrooples> @sassal0x @GrayscaleInvest @ethhub_io @econoar Also crypto YT is catching onto EIP1559. Word is getting out how bullish eth fundamentals and monetary policy is. | 0 replies 1 retweets 8 likes | |
| 1228093780844261376 2020-02-13 15:09:08 -0700 <Teutonium> /1 #Ethereum changing to PoS means that: More supply will be locked Less $ETH dumping to pay the electric bills Less inflation needed to pay for security EIP1559 on #Ethereum means that: More transactions = more burned $ETH = less supply = higher price per ETH. | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1228175475966562304 2020-02-13 20:33:46 -0700 <0xTycoon> @muellerberndt @badcryptobitch Haha, I like it - although I'd probably convert my air-dropped BTC to ETH in a jiffy! Anyhow, they will be paying the ETH holders for the privilege of accessing higher security & decentralization through EIP-1559 anyway. 😋 | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1228429345796083714 2020-02-14 13:22:33 -0700 <pythianism> 2/3 Why now? JPM/ConsenSys deal going through is an unfathomably big event signaling a shift to public chains with ETH as the winner ETH 2 phase 0 staking signals a new economic value prop for eth EIP 1559 starts to give institutions a valuation heuristic for assessing TAM | 4 replies 3 retweets 85 likes | |
| 1228455828300038145 2020-02-14 15:07:47 -0700 <TheCryptoLark> @CraZyBad1234 @Altcoinbuzzio I think this is frequently misunderstood. Yearly inflation is dropping under 0.5% in phase 1.5 of the upgrade. That is lower than bitcoin will be until 2032. Plus eip 1559 may introduce burning | 1 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1228468793740890112 2020-02-14 15:59:18 -0700 <0xTycoon> @ARythmist @econoar PoS in ETH 2.0 locks money in, creates skin in the game. It's also not the only coin-locker though (see #DeFi). But the real deal may be EIP-1559, where fees from $ETH tx will be burned, cementing Ether's role as a reserve currency | 1 replies 0 retweets 7 likes | |
| 1228501697460346880 2020-02-14 18:10:03 -0700 <DeFiDaJo> @ARythmist @econoar Eth2.0 with pos has superior economic and security models compared to btc. More secure, and with eip-1559, and a multitude of other factors, will appreciate significantly compared to btc. It's not a matter of if, but when eth wrecks btc | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1228567062332624896 2020-02-14 22:29:47 -0700 <begcoins> @iam__vance EIP1559 is a very big deal | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1228600037149741057 2020-02-15 00:40:49 -0700 <CHalexov2016> @IvanOnTech Eip 1559 Ivan 🤝🪐 | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1228602233228537856 2020-02-15 00:49:33 -0700 <RichardHeartWin> @IvanOnTech EIP-1559 | 1 replies 0 retweets 11 likes | |
| 1228606111676157953 2020-02-15 01:04:58 -0700 <mugeimunou> ビーコンチェーンが実装されたらステーキングしてみよかな。420万ETHのステーキングとして年率7.2%か。 gasからBASEFEEに手数料が変更され、手数料部分はバーンされその分をステーキング報酬にされるのでインフレも軽減（EIP-1559）。面白そう。#イーサリアム https://t.co/vUzsrLB9ds | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1228635126881538049 2020-02-15 03:00:15 -0700 <babylon_eth> @RichardHeartWin @IvanOnTech The EIP 1559 does good things for staking those 32 ether also. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1228655185821675520 2020-02-15 04:19:58 -0700 <babylon_eth> @ethAur44 @ethereum You forget to include a different staking model woth EIP 1559 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1228655549195010048 2020-02-15 04:21:24 -0700 <GabiCryptoKing> Tbh I personally believe 10K is too much but 3-5K is very much possible in #BullRun $ETH Very well explained by @IvanOnTech 👏🏼👏🏼 https://t.co/cN3hVOnKYT Upcoming Pos Defi LockUp Eetherum 2.0 EIP 1559 https://t.co/YpwOdH4Gnr | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1228715408011808768 2020-02-15 08:19:16 -0700 <Teutonium> @MMcrypto No fixed supply doesn't matter as much as low inflation, which $ETH will have after the move to PoS, and even that extremely low inflation can actually turn into deflation with EIP1559. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1228775470000300032 2020-02-15 12:17:56 -0700 <begcoins> @AnondranCrypto EIP-1559 will make Eth an SoV coin. Have you read about it? Barry just read the paper about it. | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1228776151599828993 2020-02-15 12:20:38 -0700 <begcoins> @spencernoon @GrayscaleInvest If you haven't read about the EIP-1559 upgrade then hold your opinion about Eth until you do. Eth 2.0 plans to make Eth a SoV coin 🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀 | 0 replies 1 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1228776402176004096 2020-02-15 12:21:38 -0700 <begcoins> @BakktstreetBoys @spencernoon @sassal0x @GrayscaleInvest EIP-1559 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1228829246417756161 2020-02-15 15:51:37 -0700 <Agusx1211> @pabwass @econoar The only diff between ETH and BTC is that BTC has a more "limited" monetary policy, but at this moment it's not clear which one is better, ETH may have "infinite issuance" but has clear boundaries for it's inflation (compared to fiat, that definitely has value), let aside EIP1559 | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1228877142127022080 2020-02-15 19:01:56 -0700 <harithk17> https://t.co/avReOMBuAB A fan of @karl_dot_tech unique speaking style since ethcc 2018 (yeahhh! stickers!) Talk flew over my head though - couldn't we just implement EIP1559 and channel a % of burnt fees to funding grants? Probably missed a nuance. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1228897302275919872 2020-02-15 20:22:03 -0700 <DeFiStandard> gracias a mecanismos compensatorios como la quema de fees contemplada en el eip-1559. Para aquellos que no hablen inglés y quieran saber más sobre el tema: https://t.co/52q7zkbNWI | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1228970297665126402 2020-02-16 01:12:06 -0700 <VillaNivla> @TheRealKenRon @sunnydecree You mean EIP1559? | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1229071242566782976 2020-02-16 07:53:13 -0700 <BitcoinCartoon> @KennethMelvin17 @SatoshiLite @ethereum your bias make you ignore innovation Ethereum has going on even beyond 2.0 with EIP 1559, monetary policy, NFTs. Best case for BTC is to survive on the ETH chain. Some of the token mechanics of DeFi alone are legit empowering. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1229129226059579392 2020-02-16 11:43:38 -0700 <Tetranode> @krugman25 @nigeon True, but the information assymetry is so high that the market practically treats these things we saw on the roadmap, as black swans. The shock from the choo choo train of deposit contract, phase 0, phase 1 w/ EIP-1559 l, phase 2 will take the market for a ride. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1229189037879156747 2020-02-16 15:41:18 -0700 <DeFiStandard> En el caso de Eth 2.0, y en caso de que el eip-1559 se implemente, los block rewards dejarían de tener un efecto dilutivo si su emisión se compensa con la quema de fees. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1229282161792032772 2020-02-16 21:51:20 -0700 <FlyGuyInTheSky> @YORK780 @asegpi @cointradernik $Eth does not have a fixed inflation rate #EIP1559 | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1229378723863883776 2020-02-17 04:15:03 -0700 <Badboybubby5> @qShaneDouglas @TraderCobb @danny_knight @roryhighside I don’t think the word overtake was used . I am a big believer in btc and what the robust security network it has developed is worth . However If you want to talk about ethereum and the big IFS of POS, sharding , EIP1559, defi , nightfall , Aztec. I can allieviate ur maximalism | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1229684941832826880 2020-02-18 00:31:51 -0700 <IvanOnTech> ETHEREUM $10K TARGET ✅ Ethereum PoS inflation cut ✅ EIP 1559 fee market change ✅ DeFi will go from billions to trillions and that switch will require economic bandwidth (cred @RyanSAdams) ✅ DeFi legos are combined to achieve exponential progress #NotFinancialAdvice | 28 replies 52 retweets 294 likes | |
| 1229685810766594049 2020-02-18 00:35:18 -0700 <ActaNonVerba888> @IvanOnTech @RyanSAdams Is eip 1559 confirmed? When will it be implemented? | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1229851454434893824 2020-02-18 11:33:30 -0700 <CHalexov2016> Be smart and hodl just 32 $eth #ethereum if you cant stock more! Eth2 is coming! #defi is every day stronger! Proff of stake aka POS is ready to go live! Btw gas burn by eip 1559 is ready too! And all big players build only on trusted @ethereum & @Consensys 🤝🪐✔️ https://t.co/IkeTGPHdP4 | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1229929145209147392 2020-02-18 16:42:13 -0700 <CryptoFletch> @LShillver @SHILLERSrUS @manzoli_kenneth @RyanXander3 Trust me when EIP 1559 gets implemented this summer for Ethereum it will definitely have a lower supply than Neblio in the coming years😉 | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1229948615038160896 2020-02-18 17:59:35 -0700 <scupytrooples> @mflaxman Eth 2.0 monetary policy is solid af. The issuance is 1-2% annually depending on the number of stakers, but it’s real issuance will be <1% or even negative thanks to EIP-1559 (which burns the majority of transaction fees). | 0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1229993196219797504 2020-02-18 20:56:44 -0700 <Ride0rDai> @antiprosynth EIP 1559 is the real game changer which allows Ethereum’s monetary policy to surpass Bitcoin’s fixed supply monetary policy. | 0 replies 0 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1230006725870325760 2020-02-18 21:50:30 -0700 <Teutonium> @TokenVision99 $BTC = OFC! $VET = same reasons has you, plus one of the few tokenomics that make sense... $CEL = A business with cashflow is always great to hodl... $ETH = starting this bag right now, EIP1559 looks SOLID! $STEEM and $BAT= I like blogging, so I got both of these through blogging | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1230014682699833344 2020-02-18 22:22:07 -0700 <Teutonium> @oAcido Etherians are more worried atm with DeFi, ETH2.0, EIP1559, which makes sense since instead of talking about the flippening, they are making sure it will happen by adding these. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1230136001948983298 2020-02-19 06:24:12 -0700 <CHalexov2016> Looks like $eth #ethereum will soon bring next 50-60% rise... next stop will be 400-500$ before $btc halving and ETH2 reliese with POS and gas burn proposal eip 1559 🤝🪐✔️ not bad at all. Btw eth have 24 bilion $ volume! You can always take 1 milion $ out with no price crash! 😜 https://t.co/UFYTsV4KRi | 0 replies 0 retweets 7 likes | |
| 1230341836893499393 2020-02-19 20:02:07 -0700 <4Tendies> @therealwhodunit @RyanSAdams Yeah it won’t be token economics driven until staking and eip 1559 are live, but once they are and inflation is under 1 percent plus eth burn on transaction, I think it will positively affect price. | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1230378753471197184 2020-02-19 22:28:48 -0700 <Teutonium> @RyanSAdams Tbh without PoS and EIP1559 Ethereum having more transactions wouldn't increase the price by much... with EIP1559 more tx means a better price. Thats the beauty of the system. If only the tokenomics had been changed years ago... | 2 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1230458619117920257 2020-02-20 03:46:10 -0700 <antiprosynth> @edmundedgar @koeppelmann I think you need to read EIP 1559 a bit more carefully :) https://t.co/FqKnlHyLgD | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1230565753432100864 2020-02-20 10:51:53 -0700 <Teutonium> @lastmjs @RyanSAdams More transactions would only mean the ETH going to the miners via tx fees to be dumped on the market to pay for their mining rigs... EIP1559 and PoS change this. There is an incentive to hodl, incentive that isn't like some coins have that is basically a HODL religion. | 0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1230754065572720640 2020-02-20 23:20:10 -0700 <4Tendies> @original_joes @4_bandiera @TrustlessState Currently fees go to miners. Value is moving from holders to miners. Under pos and more importantly eip 1559, a base fee of every transaction will be burned in ether. This upgrade also makes it so all fees are paid in ether. This will benefit all hodlers and should increase price | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1231072021137838080 2020-02-21 20:23:36 -0700 <CryptoFletch> @manzoli_kenneth @LShillver @RyanXander3 @SHILLERSrUS The bitcoin halving has nothing to do with Ethereum lol. Ethereum will moonshot this year because of De-FI, Enterprise Alliance, Ethereum 2.0, and EIP 1559. | 3 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1231228241572028419 2020-02-22 06:44:22 -0700 <JHancock> @0xEffAlt @ph_lux @phildaian 1) Manipulating fees on the current market is difficult to observe. I agree. When we change to EIP-1559 it will be easy to see. I worry about an ideological split at that time due to different views on how to handle the problem, or even if it is a problem. | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1231254610117087233 2020-02-22 08:29:09 -0700 <koeppelmann> Let’s talk about EIP 1559, how to phase out POW and how the first steps of the transition to Eth 2.0 will work exactly. Talking about #ProgPoW now which was already clearly rejected is a huge wast of scarce community attention. | 5 replies 19 retweets 142 likes | |
| 1231276003848343553 2020-02-22 09:54:09 -0700 <0xEffAlt> @JHancock @ph_lux @phildaian Ok, thanks for your answers! ProgPow makes more sense to me now. I would still be slightly against until we have EIP-1559, then the answers to the fee manipulation questions should be the deciding factor imo. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1231295035855048706 2020-02-22 11:09:47 -0700 <thejacobianlife> @hasufl @JHancock If Ethereum wasn't transitioning to PoS, I'd agree with 1. I think the transition to ETH2 makes it more nuanced. I sorta agree with 2 but at the same time, aren't issuance changes and EIP-1559 doing the same? | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1231384055477784576 2020-02-22 17:03:31 -0700 <econoar> @liamaharon @sassal0x eip-1559 stateless clients continued syncing optimizations there are countless things to work on | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1231429555656617985 2020-02-22 20:04:19 -0700 <danfinlay> I’m against eip-1559 gas fees for #Ethereum. I started drafting a larger piece on why, but a simple key point emerged from the writing exercise, so I shared it: https://t.co/IFvgSFMgKg | 3 replies 8 retweets 18 likes | |
| 1231429556789116928 2020-02-22 20:04:19 -0700 <danfinlay> I think more wallet devs should get familiar with eip-1559, who I expect have the most real-world experience supporting users through transactions. It has been assigned its champion! (Great meeting you @JHancock 😉) @MyCrypto @ethstatus @authereum | 0 replies 2 retweets 7 likes | |
| 1231445158433935360 2020-02-22 21:06:19 -0700 <VitalikButerin> @danfinlay In exceptional cases, sure, the escalator can give better performance. But EIP 1559 is all about making things better for people in the normal case! The escalator OTOH inherently doesn't do a good job of getting txs included in a single block, which is 1559's key goal. | 3 replies 0 retweets 32 likes | |
| 1231526609078771712 2020-02-23 02:29:58 -0700 <0xTycoon> @econoar EIP-1559 > ProgPoW | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1231579551576330241 2020-02-23 06:00:21 -0700 <CarlGocht> @danfinlay To me it seems like EIP-1559 makes txs more expensive by default, which I am not totally against especially with the number of shards we currently expect, but that is not how 1559 is marketed at all | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1231588228047785984 2020-02-23 06:34:50 -0700 <CHalexov2016> If in 2017/2018 fake scam #ico fomo push $eth #ethereum to crazy 1400$ ... what will happen in 2020/21 to ETH with ... #defi #pos #miliondevs #miliontokens #tokanize #160ktps #zksnark #sto #gasburn #eip1559 with full ETH2 reliese by @ethereum & @Consensys teams and all devs. 🪐🪐 | 0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1231630422792163328 2020-02-23 09:22:30 -0700 <meeseeking> @JHancock @iamDCinvestor @harrycanuck @CaptainCrypto33 Happy to not have EIP 1559 on ETH 1x then (despite thinking EIP 1559 is great). Horse trading EIP 1559 for ProgPOW is bad process and a bad precedent. | 0 replies 0 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1231750519162425346 2020-02-23 17:19:43 -0700 <edmundedgar> The current plan for EIP1559 is to kill miner gas voting and replace it with core-dev-governed hard forks. This failed horribly for bitcoin, but we're hoping it'll work for us. But looking the ProgPow situation, is anyone really confident about that? #AreYouFeelingLucky | 1 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1231897798938771458 2020-02-24 03:04:57 -0700 <masaoyana> @shingen_crypto eth is moneyはシンプルだけど、何故そうなのかを伝えるにはDeFiエコシステムやeip1559とか…で複雑で伝播しにくいですよねw ゴールドみたいに、みんなが既に共有している物語を連想させるようなシンプルなMemeの必要性を感じます | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1231979457562337281 2020-02-24 08:29:26 -0700 <DeFi_Dad> @intocryptoast They are but EIP1559 will help to resolve this! Right @econoar? | 1 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1231983348089786368 2020-02-24 08:44:53 -0700 <undefinedza> @DeFi_Dad @intocryptoast @econoar When EIP1559? 🚀 | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1231998167471648768 2020-02-24 09:43:47 -0700 <intocryptoast> Since EIP1559 doesn't seem like it's coming, I feel like I've come up with a nice solution for wallets like @metamask_io to integrate. Pay lowest possible fee but input longest time willing to wait. When that time comes, resend the tx at a higher price. | 3 replies 1 retweets 16 likes | |
| 1231999632210874370 2020-02-24 09:49:36 -0700 <adamscochran> @intocryptoast @metamask_io What changed with EIP1559 - it seemed to have broad support? | 1 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1232096756160053248 2020-02-24 16:15:32 -0700 <edmundedgar> EIP1559 summary: Typical confirmation time: ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ -> Usually next block Miner revenue: Block reward + congestion fees -> Block reward + buttons DoS resistance: Can do emergency reductions -> Hope nothing bad happens Capacity limit governance: Miner voting -> Ninjas | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1232306395988385798 2020-02-25 06:08:34 -0700 <edmundedgar> Hard fork core dev consensus currently consists of multiple nested layers of bitterness and confusion. Anyone who wants to move capacity management from miner voting to this needs their head examined - and that's apparently basically everyone, EIP1559 is wildly popular | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1232332617107685376 2020-02-25 07:52:46 -0700 <0xTycoon> Well, I'm getting attrited of this #ProgPow thing. It would be awesome if we could debate EIP-1559 instead! It's been implemented for geth already. Who's on board to get it active for Berlin? https://t.co/OvUStuD29t | 0 replies 3 retweets 16 likes | |
| 1232395475765977089 2020-02-25 12:02:32 -0700 <danfinlay> @intocryptoast @metamask_io That’s very similar to the escalator algorithm, an approach that I think is superior to EIP 1559, personally, although I’m hoping to collect more data to help determine so. https://t.co/N9unhFgVDY | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1232410160171233281 2020-02-25 13:00:53 -0700 <pedrouid> Where there is a will there is a way. But a better phrasing is... where there is money there is a way. EIP-1559 (and others) improves UX on Ethereum by ten-fold. Yet it was ProgPow that got heavily funded to research, develop and audit to move forward. #NoProgPow | 5 replies 5 retweets 44 likes | |
| 1232414568082804736 2020-02-25 13:18:24 -0700 <fubuloubu> @pedrouid I really don't think this is fair, the *community* demanded an audit of ProgPoW, and that's what organizations like the EF paid for. Research and development was mostly the authors, so no "Ethereum" funds really paid for it. No one re-allocated funds to ProgPoW over EIP-1559 | 0 replies 0 retweets 7 likes | |
| 1232451586254749697 2020-02-25 15:45:30 -0700 <DaxTaran> @intocryptoast @metamask_io What happened to EIP 1559? I thought tx fee burn was going to be standard in Eth2, did that change? | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1232451690227322880 2020-02-25 15:45:55 -0700 <LamboWhale> @auditmeplease @XenosVk @RichardHeartWin Ahhh, yes EIP-1559, just throw in scarcity bc that's the only thing ETH was missing, #Bitcoin is prepared for the day nation states or groups of attackers come after it, number of nodes and size of chain will one day prove why Bitcoin is king...eth longevity chances not as high | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1232496257798524929 2020-02-25 18:43:01 -0700 <econoar> @nicksdjohnson @iamDCinvestor @cyounessi1 @MakerDAO @nanexcool @ethereum I think a good example is eip1559. I wrote a medium post, put it on twitter, put it on reddit and all that before it was even brought to ACD. Now people are well aware of it. This should happen for all EIPs! Even if they are boring as hell. | 2 replies 0 retweets 7 likes | |
| 1232524673880977408 2020-02-25 20:35:56 -0700 <econoar> @edmundedgar @scott_lew_is I don’t have capacity to debate eip1559 rn 😂 | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1232557237924704259 2020-02-25 22:45:19 -0700 <FlyGuyInTheSky> No #EIP1559? Why not just pull the plug out of the $eth price. 😐 beyond me. https://t.co/5zFe7w6LkF | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1232557792692756480 2020-02-25 22:47:32 -0700 <FlyGuyInTheSky> It’s not as if people didn’t know about it and see it’s potential. #EIP1559 October 2019 | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1232561996303863809 2020-02-25 23:04:14 -0700 <FlyGuyInTheSky> @calchulus @MakerDAO #EIP1559 would have been much better. But some people haven’t got a clue. If all those positions get liquidated all that $Eth will flood the market.... | 0 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1232764664905420800 2020-02-26 12:29:34 -0700 <RyanBerckmans> 3/3 I'd add the suggestion that we might explore objective standards for public experimental validation of EIP hypotheses. For example, I'm hopeful that a software model of Ethereum monetary policy could help better predict and educate the community on the effects of EIP 1559. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1232850011186008069 2020-02-26 18:08:42 -0700 <0xTycoon> @OhGodAGirl ❌ #YesProgPoW ❌ #YesASICs ✅ #YesPoS + EIP-1559 | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1233958436875800577 2020-02-29 19:33:11 -0700 <TaoDang87> @Venom20004 @Arthur_0x There is a decent chance some defi tokens go loco in the next year or two. Eth 2.0 and staking Defi growing very quickly Eip 1559 | 0 replies 1 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1233977361013469185 2020-02-29 20:48:23 -0700 <JHancock> @owocki @quentinc137 For some context. Geth has 322377 lines of code over 902 Go files. EIP 1559 PR +7990, -1405 out of 84 files. Progpow PR Less than 40 lines of code <not a Progpow statement, just context> | 3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1233992662971117569 2020-02-29 21:49:11 -0700 <edmundedgar> @JHancock @owocki @quentinc137 Not to mention, EIP1559 also rips up the current (working) method of capacity management and replaces it with... the incoherent mess of a process we're currently experiencing, every time we need to change the gas target | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1234130655547666432 2020-03-01 06:57:31 -0700 <KaiBakker> @owocki As @VitalikButerin suggested a change in the feemarket with eip1559, so people dont have to think about the fee to be paid. https://t.co/1EBISfQGR2 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1234612874426761216 2020-03-02 14:53:41 -0700 <scupytrooples> @danheld Eth is, in fact, money. Issuance policy in Eth2 is solid. Please do check out EIP-1559. | 2 replies 1 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1234636772874653696 2020-03-02 16:28:39 -0700 <scupytrooples> @APompliano Eth issuance and inflation has only gone down. With ETH2 and EIP-1559, majority of fees are burnt and issuance will be no more than ~1% and even possibly negative if there is enough transaction volume. | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1234742974053076998 2020-03-02 23:30:40 -0700 <Ada_LoveLace10> @APompliano You got it all wrong Pomp, obviously you haven't seen the EIP 1559 which will be implemented during ETH 2.0 transition. “EIP 1559: The Final Puzzle-Piece to Ethereum’s Monetary Policy” https://t.co/TVTvdT0YLT | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1234867247774126081 2020-03-03 07:44:29 -0700 <claudio_who> @RyanSAdams @APompliano @benjzx If we take into consideration the effects on Ethereum's fees once both EIP-1559, submitted by @econoar, and POS are implemented: "... the network would be operating securely at near 0 issuance", according to Eric Conner. That looks like "sound money" to me | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1235351299161354240 2020-03-04 15:47:56 -0700 <JHancock> ***Transparency Update*** I created a Substack email list for sharing Updates on EIPs and the status of upcoming Ethereum Network Upgrades. The first will be an update on EIP-1559. Shout out to @trent_vanepps for writing it with me. https://t.co/BR7sphOL7a | 12 replies 26 retweets 93 likes | |
| 1235352098755182593 2020-03-04 15:51:06 -0700 <nanexcool> @JHancock EIP 1559 Fee Market Anything with account abstraction please | 2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes | |
| 1235352761346097152 2020-03-04 15:53:44 -0700 <JHancock> @nanexcool EIP 1559 is going to be the first one! i'll pass the second onto @VitalikButerin . He recently wrote an updated proposal, so there may be more to share there. | 1 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1235804350246576128 2020-03-05 21:48:11 -0700 <JHancock> EIP Update Issue 1: EIP 1559 Fee market change for Eth 1.0 Where we were, where we are, and additional work ahead. Leave your questions below! https://t.co/kCSiiHqD5v | 5 replies 16 retweets 76 likes | |
| 1235808372244361222 2020-03-05 22:04:10 -0700 <0xTycoon> Nice to see EIP-1559 moving forward a lot and getting some much needed ❤️! | 0 replies 3 retweets 12 likes | |
| 1235831747297697793 2020-03-05 23:37:03 -0700 <HashSpike> EIP Update Issue 1: EIP 1559 "The implementation study was then used to create the Geth PoC we have today. The next step is to take the implementation and update the specification to match, and then to verify that the spec and the implementation say the same thing. " | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1235833326352470016 2020-03-05 23:43:20 -0700 <HashSpike> Now that we have the EIP 1559 Update Issue 1 from @JHancock, it would be good to review what the objectives of the proposal are: "EIP 1559 does two main things: 1. Establishes “the market rate” for block inclusion 2. Burns the majority of the ETH in the transaction fee" | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1235834245643296768 2020-03-05 23:46:59 -0700 <HashSpike> If you don't like reading, and would rather watch a video explaining EIP 1559, do check out @ChicoCrypto's explanation on the video linked below: https://t.co/89smTuRORs | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1235860288156479488 2020-03-06 01:30:28 -0700 <Pol_Lanski> With EIP 1559, a portion of transaction fees will be burned, which will make ETH a circuit token. (❗️❕‼️ ) 5/X | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1235921079723536385 2020-03-06 05:32:02 -0700 <nanexcool> @JHancock There were discussions that EIP 1559 was too difficult to implement and @VitalikButerin wrote about "Skinny EIP 1559" https://t.co/mT8S1C5v9C Which version will be implemented? (Looks like regular 1559) | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1235941524833210369 2020-03-06 06:53:16 -0700 <PhABCD> EIP-1559 is a massive change. It's entirely possible that it does not work as expected (reduce volatility in fees). For this, analytical and numerical analyses are needed. I suggest we offer a grant to @gauntletnetwork, team of professionals at analyzing economical systems. | 4 replies 6 retweets 50 likes | |
| 1235943618399084549 2020-03-06 07:01:36 -0700 <PhABCD> The benefit could be not only to discover some holes in the current specification, but also perhaps find ways to simplify and/or improve EIP-1559. To be clear, this would not be a *code* audit, but an audit of the mechanisms design to make sure EIP-1559 is theoretically sound. | 0 replies 0 retweets 6 likes | |
| 1236032299076120577 2020-03-06 12:53:59 -0700 <RyanBerckmans> @PhABCD @gauntletnetwork We might benefit from simulating EIP-1559 in addition to whiteboard economic analysis. I started a simulation, https://t.co/Okn7a9ZSB6, but am not a modeling expert and spent only a day on it. It's open source https://t.co/eTcklEZsmM | 1 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1236033624618786817 2020-03-06 12:59:15 -0700 <Teutonium> @VechainW Well, their move to PoS + ZKsnarks + EIP1559 looks promising. I think that not looking at other blockchains to see if there is development in the tech can be very damaging to our own projects and actually slow us down. What if they are doing something that we can do better!? | 2 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1236049015797690369 2020-03-06 14:00:24 -0700 <dankrad> @RyanBerckmans @PhABCD @gauntletnetwork That's right, however, the need to pay for security in terms of validator rewards is independent from fees. EIP-1559 nicely separates the two concerns (1) rate limiting the network (to make validation possible) (2) paying validators/miners for security. | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1236077486691225611 2020-03-06 15:53:32 -0700 <AFDudley0> @maurelian_ @angela_walch @jadler0 The geth stuff could be upstreamed one day, but right now that engineer is busy with other stuff and it would take a moderate effort to get it upstreamed. EIP-1559 comes first. | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1236319469804404737 2020-03-07 07:55:05 -0700 <CapitanGokkun> @JHancock @trent_vanepps When eip 1559 updates? | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1236773806972080128 2020-03-08 15:00:28 -0700 <elusivechad> @methmapicstutor @Unknown_Essence And burning with EIP 1559 | 0 replies 0 retweets 6 likes | |
| 1237306772936933376 2020-03-10 02:18:17 -0700 <CHalexov2016> Can you imagine $eth #ethereum same time lock in #defi + #pos !? Circulation supply of Eth2 will be real low! From today 100% its can drop on 10-20% only or les! + pos inflaction will be close to 0 with eip 1559! Bilions of $ real fiat money will push @ethereum to trilion $ 🪐 | 1 replies 3 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1238039555590283267 2020-03-12 02:50:06 -0700 <koeppelmann> those are the moments I wish we already had EIP 1559 in place. | 3 replies 0 retweets 17 likes | |
| 1238051349511778305 2020-03-12 03:36:58 -0700 <realLedgerwatch> @koeppelmann Lets create a fork with POS and EIP-1559 and see who joins :) | 1 replies 0 retweets 7 likes | |
| 1238085891660427264 2020-03-12 05:54:13 -0700 <el33th4xor> One of them is our work, linked below. It maximizes global welfare. @Avivz78 and colleagues have another worthy proposal. And EIP-1559 proposes another, more miner driven approach. https://t.co/920O0HZh40 | 2 replies 1 retweets 13 likes | |
| 1238087977282174983 2020-03-12 06:02:31 -0700 <jadler0> @_Ed1990_ @paddypisa Nothing. EIP-1559 is meant to flatten out short-term volatility. If demand for block space is consistently higher than supply, then gas price will go up irrespective of EIP-1559. | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1238095447010553857 2020-03-12 06:32:11 -0700 <VitalikButerin> ceterum censeo EIP 1559 esse aedificandum | 21 replies 12 retweets 66 likes | |
| 1238095635011776513 2020-03-12 06:32:56 -0700 <kutlusoy> @VitalikButerin But I think that we have to build EIP 1559 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1238097737897463813 2020-03-12 06:41:18 -0700 <VitalikButerin> @_Ed1990_ @paddypisa Pending for a long time..... 😢 Though it EIP 1559 gets built the transactions would be pending for a lower time :) | 0 replies 1 retweets 7 likes | |
| 1238156633072599040 2020-03-12 10:35:19 -0700 <Lanfra68> @iamDCinvestor @econoar I think EIP-1559 is the most stupid thing ever. Please nobody try to trade it for EIP-1057. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1238219103187488768 2020-03-12 14:43:33 -0700 <veliko_test3> EIP 1559 when?!?! https://t.co/10yeRLjPTU | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1238225256499814400 2020-03-12 15:08:00 -0700 <LefterisJP> @econoar you can add today's incident write up in the motivation section of eip 1559 🙃 https://t.co/40dD4WVlEs | 1 replies 2 retweets 14 likes | |
| 1238228219691560960 2020-03-12 15:19:47 -0700 <willmorriss4> @LefterisJP @econoar EIP 1559 would not have helped | 1 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1238277938077827072 2020-03-12 18:37:21 -0700 <0xTycoon> On days like this, the #Ethereum gas market is totally unpredictable! Wallets are making incorrect gas suggestions, left right and center. It's not very good UX. This is why we need EIP-1559 for $ETH! | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1238297514949804033 2020-03-12 19:55:08 -0700 <DeFi_Dad> If there were ever a day to prove why we need EIP-1559 implemented, it’s today. https://t.co/3bwKOIrhfQ | 0 replies 0 retweets 8 likes | |
| 1238345607435055104 2020-03-12 23:06:14 -0700 <willmorriss4> @JHancock @Crypt0Phil @LefterisJP @econoar We would have also had congestion with 1559. The effective gasprices would be the same because of the tip feature. It would be a while before the base fee catches up to the market price, after which eip1559 would start to do more harm than good. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1238346150266077185 2020-03-12 23:08:24 -0700 <willmorriss4> @JHancock @Crypt0Phil @LefterisJP @econoar "after which eip1559 would start to do more harm than good" | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1238351178062127110 2020-03-12 23:28:22 -0700 <JHancock> @willmorriss4 @Crypt0Phil @LefterisJP @econoar The equilibrium is half empty, and remember that 1/2 of an EIP-1559 block = 1 full block today. So if it was today, there would be higher bandwidth because it could go over 10million instead of it being a hard cap. | 2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1238354053282713600 2020-03-12 23:39:48 -0700 <willmorriss4> @JHancock @Crypt0Phil @LefterisJP @econoar I'm for changing the mechanism by which the block gas limit changes, but I cannot support a minimum gas price. The expanded bandwidth allowed by eip1559 is temporary and insufficient. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1238358823506710529 2020-03-12 23:58:45 -0700 <phil_eth> @JHancock @willmorriss4 @LefterisJP @econoar So instead we really introduce a hard cap with EIP 1559 at 16M? How is that gonna fix things? | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1238373094839824385 2020-03-13 00:55:28 -0700 <phil_eth> @JHancock @willmorriss4 @LefterisJP @econoar Well technically EIP 1559 changes the gas limit to 16M max. Maybe you you dont want to increase the avg block size/gas consumption. What I dont see is that how EIP 1559 fixes congestion in high demand situation like everyone wants to close their cdp at once. | 2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1238422686696476673 2020-03-13 04:12:31 -0700 <edmundedgar> If #EIP1559 had been in place over the last couple of days miner revenue would have abruptly halved while juicy opportunities to rob #defi by censorship or reorgs increased. This seems... risky. Do the fee market reform, but keep giving the miners the base fees. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1238436711618826240 2020-03-13 05:08:15 -0700 <LeonPedretti> Is Eip 1559 official merged in Berlin ? and when Berlin ? @econoar @sassal0x | 0 replies 2 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1238453043164839936 2020-03-13 06:13:09 -0700 <veliko_test3> Fees in Block 9660464 were higher than the block reward. Time for EIP 1559? https://t.co/WTrKUbRfJN | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1238465976061980672 2020-03-13 07:04:32 -0700 <edmundedgar> Volume on chain is 🚀 Value of the block reward is 💩 Cheap reorg or censorship attacks are 😱 Let's fix EIP1559 so it improves the fee market without burning the fees that are keeping the network safe. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1238488396789506053 2020-03-13 08:33:38 -0700 <JHancock> @alexberegszaszi EIP-1559 would have helped to reduce mempool... probably. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1238650843240394752 2020-03-13 19:19:08 -0700 <0xTycoon> The reason why MakerDAO failed yesterday was due to the price oracles, who didn't know what gas price to use for their $ETH transactions. I wish there was a more predictable way to determine the gas price... Is there any solution for this? 🤔 👀 EIP-1559 | 0 replies 1 retweets 6 likes | |
| 1238717782407159809 2020-03-13 23:45:08 -0700 <EthfinanceR> EIP 1559 update. https://t.co/xL1o7KcM4U | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1238883698289692674 2020-03-14 10:44:25 -0700 <DeFi_Dad> @MarkyGoldstein @metamask_io @defiopfi @Dharma_HQ @argentHQ @econoar Psssssst EIP-1559 👍 | 0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1238944601571901440 2020-03-14 14:46:26 -0700 <marek_> With all the recent gas price volatility and long transaction times, I'm thankful that we implemented EIP 1559 in the @CeloOrg network. Hopefully, it can provide some useful data points for the wider community when Celo launches. | 0 replies 3 retweets 15 likes | |
| 1238965259018395650 2020-03-14 16:08:31 -0700 <RaymondDurk> EIP Update Issue 1: EIP 1559 by @JHancock https://t.co/3YKyNa7MbC | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1239059152875462658 2020-03-14 22:21:37 -0700 <IslandHunting> I was very offended by GasToken, but then I realized, gas token actually temporarily increases the bandwidth of Ethereum when needed. EIP-1559 will do the same thing much more efficiently, and some other very important things for the protocol too. | 2 replies 1 retweets 18 likes | |
| 1239146918497812481 2020-03-15 04:10:22 -0700 <Zima_Crypto> @IslandHunting @tomo1e @econoar @VitalikButerin ETH2 phase 2 for gastoken or for EIP-1559, or both? | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1239267938919747585 2020-03-15 12:11:15 -0700 <Deathpup1> @tokenstate lets make it after EIP 1559 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1239626465160937472 2020-03-16 11:55:55 -0700 <cyber_hokie> @RyanMilb @Chalet_spar Someone pointed out the move from LMSR to bid/ask was a mistake. But the gas prices demanded it. I wonder if EIP-1559 would have been beneficial here. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1239672395771695104 2020-03-16 14:58:25 -0700 <marek_> 1) Oracles: One issue that contributed to #BlackThursday was that oracle updates were not getting mined. Celo implements EIP1559 which reduces gas price and transaction length volatility in times of contention, which will help oracle updates get through. | 1 replies 0 retweets 8 likes | |
| 1240307349497303041 2020-03-18 09:01:30 -0700 <jadler0> @harrycanuck @realLedgerwatch Not really! Not until EIP-1559 at least. Miners at this time can accept any currency as fee, even filthy fiat. | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1240373882386817029 2020-03-18 13:25:53 -0700 <toethmooonguy> EIP 1559 update. https://t.co/Lh6q3okTMG | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1240380340264452097 2020-03-18 13:51:32 -0700 <RyanSAdams> If Ethereum pulls off this roadmap 🚀 Big wins before sharding: Scaling transactions: ✅Rollups Scaling state: ✅Eth1 light-client Scaling economic bandwidth: ✅ETH staking ✅Issuance to ~1% (🔪 PoW) ✅Burn ETH w/ usage (EIP-1559) UX: ✅Account abstraction ✅Fee mkts+ HUGE | 4 replies 33 retweets 177 likes | |
| 1240695374743928832 2020-03-19 10:43:23 -0700 <coinpimp> @SlayerShill @gHeidenreich @WSBgod If you actually do your own research you'd see that ETH has EIP-1559 which will burn excess mining fees and possibly see a near 0 inflation rate. With ETH being a reserve asset in DeFi, Proof of Stake, and other similar vehicles we may actually see ETH become deflationary. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1240797994875789315 2020-03-19 17:31:09 -0700 <RyanBerckmans> 1/10 Ethereum's EIP-1559 will be a huge upgrade for mass-market and advanced users. Here's an explanation from a user perspective. TL;DR EIP-1559 makes gas pricing automatic and reliable. Thread 👇 | 2 replies 21 retweets 89 likes | |
| 1240797996360622081 2020-03-19 17:31:09 -0700 <RyanBerckmans> 2/10 Today in Ethereum, without EIP-1559, users are presented with a choice to pick a gas price for each transaction, and have an incentive to pay attention to this, because only they know if they want that transaction to confirm in 30 seconds or are willing to wait 3 minutes... | 1 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1240797999091126273 2020-03-19 17:31:10 -0700 <RyanBerckmans> 4/10 Also, without EIP-1559, if the user picks a gas price for their transaction to confirm in 30 seconds, they may actually end up waiting a lot longer if the Ethereum network is congested. The time estimates can be extremely inaccurate when the network is congested. | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1240797999967735809 2020-03-19 17:31:10 -0700 <RyanBerckmans> 5/10 EIP-1559 adds the concept of a "system gas price". | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1240798000806576129 2020-03-19 17:31:10 -0700 <RyanBerckmans> 6/10 With EIP-1559, users never or rarely need to pick a gas price for any transaction, because their transactions will almost always confirm in 30 seconds at the current system gas price. | 1 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1240798001666424832 2020-03-19 17:31:11 -0700 <RyanBerckmans> 7/10 Rarely, EIP-1559's current system gas price may be too high, in which case the UI can warn the user before they sign the transaction. This avoids any unexpectedly long wait and then the user may optionally pay extra or wait until the system gas price goes back down. | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1240798002614321153 2020-03-19 17:31:11 -0700 <RyanBerckmans> 8/10 EIP-1559 preserves the capability for users to set an extremely high gas price to ensure their transactions are confirmed immediately. This is very important for advanced users and platform providers such as Maker. | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1240798003767754752 2020-03-19 17:31:11 -0700 <RyanBerckmans> 9/10 Also, EIP-1559 adds tools for advanced users and software developers to reliably and cheaply control the time for a transaction to confirm, especially if the Ethereum network is congested. | 1 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1240798004984139777 2020-03-19 17:31:11 -0700 <RyanBerckmans> 10/10 It'll be a great day when EIP-1559 is launched. You can see it in Vitalik's roadmap for the next 5-10 years of Ethereum. https://t.co/LcWpw3w4uu | 2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes | |
| 1240841031853256705 2020-03-19 20:22:10 -0700 <RyanBerckmans> @hackdomTEX I'm not a contributor to EIP-1559 or sure when it may launch. If you want to learn more I'd start here https://t.co/yrRTUAfXQT | 2 replies 1 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1240922601511432193 2020-03-20 01:46:18 -0700 <5dayoldburrito> @RyanBerckmans I hope he doesn’t mean it takes 5 years to implement EIP 1559 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1241428184899506177 2020-03-21 11:15:18 -0700 <ReadReed> @RyanBerckmans @hackdomTEX Shout out to @econoar for championing EIP-1559 | 0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1242667341202092032 2020-03-24 21:19:16 -0700 <josephch> Ethereum 2020: A Roadmap and Outlook https://t.co/9omsBvEOJZ The Beacon Chain and BLS12-381 precompile look likely for 2020. If EIP 1559 & account abstraction get owners soon, maybe they'll make it too. There's plenty of parallel work happening but too long for one article. | 10 replies 37 retweets 113 likes | |
| 1242682595785097218 2020-03-24 22:19:53 -0700 <ChainLinkGod> @Jihoz_Axie And with EIP 1559 each stablecoin/token transfer burns some ETH potentially making Ethereum's net issuance negative ;) | 2 replies 1 retweets 16 likes | |
| 1242723867195404288 2020-03-25 01:03:53 -0700 <0xTycoon> @Jihoz_Axie Exactly. Though rather than decreasing issuance, fees will be burned as per EIP-1559 which is part of the ETH 2.0 spec Meanwhile issuance is going to be very low anyways, most likely under %1 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1242904389951635461 2020-03-25 13:01:13 -0700 <niran> @VitalikButerin I like the goal, but will it work? Why would users choose L2s/apps that redirect the surplus instead of returning it to the users like a co-op does, or using the surplus to burn a token they hold like EIP1559 does? | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1243183705256067073 2020-03-26 07:31:07 -0700 <moon30011986> ethereumRT josephch: Ethereum 2020: A Roadmap and Outlook https://t.co/rQYFs0NtgL The Beacon Chain and BLS12-381 precompile look likely for 2020. If EIP 1559 & account abstraction get owners soon, maybe they'll make it too. There's plenty of parallel work happening but too long… https://t.co/chgR4Yh5uH | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1244317719945756674 2020-03-29 10:37:17 -0700 <AlexMasmej> Why Ethereum 2 is huge: 📈 ETH price will rise because of low issuance; PoS/EIP-1559 provide better security & decentralization too 💡 New types of dapps will flourish: from EVM ➡️ *VM + SC-meta-tx ⏰ Best timing (global crisis) Great piece by @0xKiwi_ https://t.co/LV9XQBJAOx | 1 replies 15 retweets 27 likes | |
| 1244642120956182529 2020-03-30 08:06:20 -0700 <scupytrooples> @vladolariu @DeFi_Dad @sassal0x @claverus85 If eth2 runs near capacity, Ethereum could actually be deflationary, and even harder than bitcoin. Read up on EIP-1559. TLDR, majority of gas fee gets burned. So if tx volume is high enough, burn rate > issuance rate. | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1244981485146238976 2020-03-31 06:34:51 -0700 <0x_Lucas> EIP 1559 will make network transactions a net consumer of economic bandwidth | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1245007509225721862 2020-03-31 08:18:15 -0700 <AlexMasmej> About EIP-1559: “elegance involves burning some fees which counterbalances inflation of ETH without greatly diminishing miner rewards. There’s been some work since the EIP was proposed almost a year ago” “Unfortunately, there is no current owner.” No owner, really?? @econoar? | 2 replies 1 retweets 6 likes | |
| 1245050230543994882 2020-03-31 11:08:01 -0700 <StakeETH> @TimBeiko @econoar @AlexMasmej @PegaSysEng @AlexMasmej The model below includes an EIP 1559 simulation. Current analysis does not include transaction fees as it is for Phase 0 - the next iteration will be from 10MM - 30MM ETH staked and include TX fee's / burn https://t.co/2352XRNXJ7 | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1245321511239659520 2020-04-01 05:05:59 -0700 <AlexMasmej> @JordiMorris1 Does Constantinople add a new issuance model and EIP1559? No! | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1245332192097644544 2020-04-01 05:48:26 -0700 <Daniel85Reiss> @zndtoshi @mikedemarais @VitalikButerin less than the 110 million ethers we currently have. ETH is deflationary. Please read EIP 1559. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1245332649515892737 2020-04-01 05:50:15 -0700 <zndtoshi> @Daniel85Reiss @mikedemarais @VitalikButerin First link says this: EIP 1559: Fee market change for ETH 1.0 chain What is ETH? 1.0 or 2.0? | 2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1246593552198533123 2020-04-04 17:20:38 -0700 <VitalikButerin> @JHancock @_prestwich @KamesCG And EIP 1559 *is* a actually totally not eth2-related improvement to.... fee markets. | 0 replies 0 retweets 7 likes | |
| 1246768009324171266 2020-04-05 04:53:51 -0700 <VitalikButerin> @_prestwich @KamesCG > state rent Statelessness won out because it's better for devex. > faster clients Already happening. Eth1 clients much better than 2 years ago. > fee markets EIP 1559? Account abstraction? Both in the works. > other incremental improvements Like the state network? | 1 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1247154210153451521 2020-04-06 06:28:29 -0700 <NipolNIpol> These lobbies will be a factor that many people use Dai. Instead of adding new collateral. For Ethereum, it will be even clearer when EIP-1559 is applied. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1247542140583862279 2020-04-07 08:09:59 -0700 <ChengYilun> .@VitalikButerin says ETH 1.x teams have made considerable progress on EIP 1559, state tree format change, and witness size reduction. He also pinpoints ETH2's potential security vulnerabilities and research areas that should be prioritized for ETH2 phase 2 and beyond | 0 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1247641959801294848 2020-04-07 14:46:37 -0700 <ChainLinkGod> @if_singularity @RyanSAdams @vladolariu @antiprosynth As DeFi and PoS lock up swallows the circulating supply of ETH, it will indeed be scarce and with EIP 1559, issuance can actually become negative while still having a predictable security budget | 1 replies 2 retweets 6 likes | |
| 1247644852491337730 2020-04-07 14:58:07 -0700 <VanHeuer> @ChainLinkGod @antiprosynth @if_singularity @RyanSAdams @vladolariu when will EIP 1559 be released? | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1248019073671127041 2020-04-08 15:45:08 -0700 <TokenBrice> @benjaminjwhitby @econoar @sassal0x @future_tunking @ethlorenz Would be awesome to have a full one on gas, loads of us half wiggle who haven't dabbled with dapp development don't really know what's up there ➡ Chat with GST ➡ How to streamline gas management for end users? ➡ Your inputs on EIP1559 & its impacts on the gas price/market | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1248019662031347712 2020-04-08 15:47:29 -0700 <auryn_macmillan> If you could ask a question of the @ethereum community, in the form of "Should ethereum...?", what would it be? e.g. " should Ethereum implement #EIP1559?" | 2 replies 4 retweets 16 likes | |
| 1248273748576423938 2020-04-09 08:37:08 -0700 <ChainNewscom> 【tBTC 并不会挑战 ETH 地位，反而有利于其价值累积】诸如 EIP1559 之类机制的未来实现会进一步加强 ETH 作为网络不可缺少资产的地位。 https://t.co/JOcveFIzRp | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1248601721347153921 2020-04-10 06:20:22 -0700 <RyanSAdams> Connecting some dots... Ethereum is winning stablecoins, maybe next it wins social media coins And when you use a coin on Ethereum in Eth2 you pay ETH holders: - once if their holding ETH (EIP1559) - twice if they're staking ETH Yah, I think value will accrue to ETH | 3 replies 13 retweets 45 likes | |
| 1248679781434040323 2020-04-10 11:30:33 -0700 <PhABCD> Anyone still interested in EIP-1559? Doesn't seem to be pushed much anywhere. In my opinion, the best way to speed up its adoption is to have an independent team do a thorough system dynamic review. Once we have this, hardfork discussions on 1559 will be much easier. | 1 replies 7 retweets 34 likes | |
| 1248709950953738240 2020-04-10 13:30:26 -0700 <VitalikButerin> @PhABCD There are quite a few people working on EIP 1559! See eg. analysis by @barnabemonnot https://t.co/azLitevlzu | 1 replies 0 retweets 21 likes | |
| 1248780551311388672 2020-04-10 18:10:59 -0700 <danfinlay> @PhABCD @VitalikButerin @barnabemonnot I'd love to see a RIG analysis against the escalator algorithm, for completeness. I really suspect under systematic analysis it out-performs EIP-1559 under a variety of conditions. I've opened an EIP. https://t.co/PAzNGUK7xA | 2 replies 1 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1249697220284182528 2020-04-13 06:53:30 -0700 <Gargant34260060> @AlexanderFisher @JHancock @ETHGasStation Yes they do pay our miners 👍 but if eip1559 was in place they might be paying more to the ecosystem as a whole not just the miners | 2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1249727272967340033 2020-04-13 08:52:55 -0700 <pcaversaccio> EIP 1559 is perhaps one of the most anticipated upgrades to the economic model of #Ethereum. Proposed by @VitalikButerin, the mechanism seeks to replace the first-price auction model governing the current fee market for transaction inclusion. https://t.co/A86lFFYrES | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1249738429086281728 2020-04-13 09:37:15 -0700 <veliko_test3> EIP 1559 is perhaps one of the most anticipated upgrades to the economic model of Ethereum. Proposed by Vitalik Buterin in his Blockchain Resource Pricing paper, the mechanism seeks to replace the first-price auction model governing the current fee mar... https://t.co/C4gEdBRjnp | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1249739026661244928 2020-04-13 09:39:37 -0700 <AlexanderFisher> @Gargant34260060 @JHancock @ETHGasStation Speaking of 1559. I hadn't caught this report released 10 days ago because the world was burning, but very interesting work to begin simulating the effects of 1559! EIP 1559: A transaction fee market proposal https://t.co/bPc6whH7Zt | 1 replies 3 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1249739691370283011 2020-04-13 09:42:16 -0700 <econoar> Great writeup and simulations on EIP-1559 done by @barnabemonnot of the Robust Incentives Group at the EF. | 1 replies 6 retweets 16 likes | |
| 1249753513174929409 2020-04-13 10:37:11 -0700 <r_Ethereum> EIP 1559 is perhaps one of the most anticipated upgrades to the economic model of Ethereum. Proposed by Vitalik Buterin in his Blockchain Resource Pricing paper, the mechanism seeks to replace the first-price auction model governing the current fee marke… https://t.co/RzMWoOgHcg | 1 replies 17 retweets 41 likes | |
| 1249764573193928711 2020-04-13 11:21:08 -0700 <spencernoon> @austingriffith @danfinlay Not that I'm aware of but maybe! Out of band payments were originally introduced to me by @ArthurB, who I saw mention them on Twitter some time ago, and this idea came to me while reading this awesome EIP 1559 analysis by @barnabemonnot: https://t.co/ODWiONKvQW | 2 replies 1 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1249791137889452032 2020-04-13 13:06:41 -0700 <the_crypto_feed> /r/ethereum: eip 1559 is perhaps one of the most anticipated upgrades to the economic model of ethereum. proposed by vitalik buterin in his blockchain resource pricing paper, the mechanism.. https://t.co/W5iLyZACwe | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1249843054086746113 2020-04-13 16:32:59 -0700 <barnabemonnot> @danfinlay @spencernoon @austingriffith @ArthurB Thanks! I saw somewhere (not related to eip1559 necessarily) the idea of out-of-band payments as a counterstrategy for miners in a mechanism where for instance the mining rewards are split over several successive blocks. I agree that it is a concern we need to look into | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1249967752401555457 2020-04-14 00:48:30 -0700 <DomainAddress4u> EIP 1559 is perhaps one of the most anticipated upgrades to the economic model of Ethereum. Proposed by Vitalik Buterin in his Blockchain Resource Pricing paper, the mechanism seeks to replace the first-price auction model governing the current fee market for transaction inc… | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1249968299997188097 2020-04-14 00:50:40 -0700 <0xTycoon> @spencernoon @MikeAbundo No thanks. I'd rather have EIP-1559 or something similar. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1250050132617375744 2020-04-14 06:15:51 -0700 <evan_van_ness> #MostClicked * @barnabemonnot eip1559 fee mkt sim * @dannyryan design to turn off PoW * @reddit ERC20 karma * @MakerDAO top 10 Dai use cases * @a16z crypto biz model benefits * @adrianmcli ethersjs vs web3js * @etherchain_org eth2 explorer chart explainer * @Rocket_Pool GUI shots | 0 replies 7 retweets 20 likes | |
| 1250090832574722048 2020-04-14 08:57:34 -0700 <etherchain_org> With EIP1559 the plan is to burn ETH with every transaction. Do you think it's a good idea to jeopardize the security of the network this way? *Theoretically* the value of ETH should increase,...but what if not? #Ethereum https://t.co/IqoHMTCwyV | 4 replies 2 retweets 7 likes | |
| 1250219041764962304 2020-04-14 17:27:02 -0700 <mattmeek_> I love EOS but today I sold most of my EOS and converted it to ETH. I am just failing to see how it competes with ETH in value accrual. ETH: Defi (locking up Eth) EIP1559 (Burn Fees) Staking EOS: Defi (not really there yet) No EIP1559 equivalent Not competitive with Staking | 40 replies 21 retweets 180 likes | |
| 1250223626520891393 2020-04-14 17:45:15 -0700 <mattmeek_> @TrustlessState @c4chaos @tokenstate @RyanSAdams Definitely. This is the right direction IMO and will only further solidify the community around ETH. Staking, EIP1559 and the DeFi momentum definitely swung me from a 50-50 ETH-EOS split to 95-5. Im sure it will swing others too. Still love EOS but not for value accrual | 2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1250383114972651520 2020-04-15 04:19:00 -0700 <QuickNode> Anticipated #ethereum upgrade, EIP 1559: Proposed by @VitalikButerin in his #Blockchain Resource Pricing paper, the mechanism seeks to replace the first-price auction model governing the current fee market for transaction inclusion. https://t.co/1RfZkJPo8q https://t.co/R84HeTHNTA | 0 replies 3 retweets 6 likes | |
| 1250531710388670464 2020-04-15 14:09:28 -0700 <willmorriss4> @mattmeek_ EIP1559 isn’t going to happen, thankfully. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1250581744773808134 2020-04-15 17:28:17 -0700 <CryptoEliteNews> EIP 1559 is perhaps one of the most anticipated upgrades to the economic model of Ethereum. Proposed... #auction #blockchain #economic #ethereum https://t.co/WKsnj9n60q https://t.co/YTQLNmPpbP | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1250844921864622081 2020-04-16 10:54:03 -0700 <zetaseek> @umurbasar @TrustlessState @antiprosynth On top of this issuance reduction, Eth2 intends to replace the fee auction market and gas prices from transaction fees with a different strategy called EIP1559. You don’t need to understand how it works, but just know the majority of fees spent will be burned in this model. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1250852186122264576 2020-04-16 11:22:55 -0700 <WilsonWithiam> @pyskell @MessariCrypto It would be an interesting development, and I wouldn't be surprised if it eventually was the case... if it weren't for EIP 1559, which would lock in ETH as the only form of payment for transaction fees if implemented. | 1 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1250871907769032705 2020-04-16 12:41:17 -0700 <FigoETH> @danheld @robustus I don't see it that way. In my opinion ETH will be a relevant global SoV in 2030 by Ethereum becoming a global settlement layer and ETHs other characteristics (Staking, collateral for DeFi, EIP 1559). More like a new global reserve currency. | 2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1250904920162594816 2020-04-16 14:52:28 -0700 <ChainLinkGod> @antiprosynth @AaveAave Then you are heavily misinterpreting what I am saying, something that is not 100% bullish on ETH is not an attack, just an observation, look at my ENS name ETH will do just fine with PoS, EIP 1559, and it's share of collateral in DeFi | 1 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1250934245717139457 2020-04-16 16:49:00 -0700 <DoubleNSC> @kyletorpey @nic__carter @IamNomad Having enough economic activity to justify self-sufficient security with reasonable fees is the point.. If fees are low enough per txn and high in aggregate, you can reduce issuance. Potentially to 0 or negative (through deflationary burning)!! EIP-1559 https://t.co/I3Mk4CZz7j | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1250941029920002050 2020-04-16 17:15:57 -0700 <adamscochran> 34/50 Finally we have our last, and perhaps most important reason for ETH2.0 driving critical growth: Reason #7: Burning for Flat Supply with EIP-1559: EIP-1559 ( https://t.co/VCSz7UON0F) is a way to change the fees on the Ethereum blockchain take place. https://t.co/Pqo1vEm3RX | 1 replies 1 retweets 26 likes | |
| 1250951096778067969 2020-04-16 17:55:57 -0700 <musatheredguard> @BambouClub Staking is happening, development is ongoing. There are other ways to establish ETH captures some of the value flowing through it. EIP-1559(dev in progress) will require some ETH to be burned on every transaction, instead of just going to miners | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1250953826623864833 2020-04-16 18:06:48 -0700 <max_bronstein> @nic__carter @BambouClub @AviFelman In terms of doing so directly through crypto, I’m not sure there’s much. You’ll get narrative juice from EIP-1559. You could short BTC/Stablecoin and then long BTC/Foreign Stablecoin, but not sure if infra is there. Best strong dollar plays are outside crypto. | 2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1250957478705139712 2020-04-16 18:21:19 -0700 <moigottweets> @kyletorpey @nic__carter @IamNomad @reginatto @TornadoCash With EIP 1559 Incoming I hope they do. They pay fees which get burn and increase sacrcity | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1250985982582800384 2020-04-16 20:14:35 -0700 <cryptobenny3> EIP1559 pwease $ETH | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1250991291648729088 2020-04-16 20:35:40 -0700 <leokcheng> ETH 2.0 is bullish for many reasons. @AdamScochran sums it all up nicely in this 🧵 Supply Reduction: Staking -> Supply Shock -> FOMO; ETH BASEFEE Burn (EIP1559) Demand Increase: Utility in network + Staking I'm stacking more $ETH. | 0 replies 2 retweets 7 likes | |
| 1251176019978936320 2020-04-17 08:49:43 -0700 <Gargant34260060> @TimBeiko @greg_colvin @OhGodAGirl Thanks for a great effort to record the discussion- but just a small note that there seems no real prioritisation of eip’s & focus on implementing what matters, an example is the apparent lack of drive by anyone on the acd calls to push fwd the impactful eip - 1559 | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1251182700775514112 2020-04-17 09:16:16 -0700 <CapitanGokkun> @TimBeiko Eip 1559 on Berlin? | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1251512709520273408 2020-04-18 07:07:36 -0700 <veliko_test3> What is the incentive for miners to include transactions in the block under EIP-1559? https://t.co/doyET0IH31 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1251711733212708864 2020-04-18 20:18:27 -0700 <tokenstate> Don't forget ETH will slash inflation by 80% once POS is stabilized. (AKA block finality) Then EIP-1559 fee burns 🔥 $5000 or more ETH within next 18 months IMO. | 1 replies 0 retweets 17 likes | |
| 1251781442465562625 2020-04-19 00:55:27 -0700 <DomainAddress4u> What is the incentive for miners to include transactions in the block under EIP-1559? via /r/ethereum https://t.co/cow8cwov9c hot 🔥 in #reddit #ethereum #eth #crypto | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1251958495089324033 2020-04-19 12:39:00 -0700 <mattmeek_> Dash and Ethereum lead this race! Value Accrual for Dash: - Staking (masternodes) - Dash Investment Foundation (burns dash/holds equity for masternodes) Value Accrual for ETH: - Staking - EIP1559 (burn fees) - DeFi (locks up ETH) ETHs well known, Dash is a sleeping giant | 1 replies 9 retweets 34 likes | |
| 1251982870601625602 2020-04-19 14:15:51 -0700 <Rewkang> Curious about the latest with EIP 1559 - the proposed improvement for the Ethereum Transaction Fee Market? @barnabemonnot has an update with some intense research & modeling 👇 https://t.co/9GefeApHfk | 2 replies 2 retweets 17 likes | |
| 1252267860879126531 2020-04-20 09:08:18 -0700 <niran> @RyanSAdams @meeseeking @tokenterminal ETH gets discounted due to an uncertain maximum supply. With EIP 1559, it's possible to set a maximum supply with predictable security subsidies. https://t.co/9HVq62rXl6 | 0 replies 0 retweets 6 likes | |
| 1252454854343229440 2020-04-20 21:31:21 -0700 <Thoth123456> @jeitoapp @intocryptoverse EIP 1559 will fix inflation for ETH. https://t.co/TH8AvWh6Hk | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1253019606211534854 2020-04-22 10:55:28 -0700 <0xEthereum_> We NEED a new fee mechanism like the one proposed in EIP1559. I would imagine to an outsider our current system seems kind of scammy given the amount of control miners have. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1253027432631853057 2020-04-22 11:26:34 -0700 <FigoETH> Why I don't think this is reasonable: - You can't stake USDT in ETH 2.0 and earn interest - USDT is not a trust minimized collateral the same way ETH is. Protocols like MKR can use it only to a small degree. - USDT doesn't get burned due to EIP 1559 | 1 replies 2 retweets 10 likes | |
| 1253180470424039424 2020-04-22 21:34:41 -0700 <Gargant34260060> @willprice221 @twigwam @ethereum @flipsidecrypto This is why eip 1559 matters @hudsonjameson | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1253380306276544512 2020-04-23 10:48:46 -0700 <Gargant34260060> @LefterisJP This is why we need EIP 1559 | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1253415515269156864 2020-04-23 13:08:40 -0700 <BiggBillBrasky> @TrustlessState @BanklessHQ Great overview. I’m having trouble finding a timeline for EIP 1559. How close is it to being implemented? Is there an agreed upon timeframe of when we might see it? | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1253426863885611009 2020-04-23 13:53:46 -0700 <CHalexov2016> @avrare @ethereum Not much sunce if they add eip 1559 .. its gas burn proposal so... | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1253568008854831112 2020-04-23 23:14:38 -0700 <Cbranco13> [Bitfly Accuses EIP1559 Of Jeopardizing Network Security And Vitalik Dismisses It] Bitfly just twee... https://t.co/Qo7qkrlZBE https://t.co/Hqa8Qn0tQG | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1253576868588146688 2020-04-23 23:49:50 -0700 <mark91014> [Bitfly Accuses EIP1559 Of Jeopardizing Network Security And Vitalik Dismisses It] Bitfly just twee... https://t.co/9WvJTDbhI2 https://t.co/UApEqISd1Q | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1253672945001607168 2020-04-24 06:11:36 -0700 <c771e2ee9be6448> @IamCryptoWolf EIP 1559 taken into account? | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1253716967900487682 2020-04-24 09:06:32 -0700 <AndrewDARMACAP> When is the timeline for eip-1559 inclusion? @econoar @VitalikButerin @dannyryan @hudsonjameson | 5 replies 6 retweets 37 likes | |
| 1253720104249864203 2020-04-24 09:19:00 -0700 <econoar> @DeFiDaJo @AndrewDARMACAP @VitalikButerin @dannyryan @hudsonjameson While progpow is annoying, it's pretty much just a political topic at this point. eip1559 is a very complex change to the entire system. It requires a lot of research, modeling, testing and eventual development. That requires bodies and funding. | 1 replies 0 retweets 14 likes | |
| 1253722515563831300 2020-04-24 09:28:35 -0700 <CHalexov2016> @econoar @DeFiDaJo @AndrewDARMACAP @VitalikButerin @dannyryan @hudsonjameson So i see no eip 1559 😊😂😂😂 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1253737006208819201 2020-04-24 10:26:10 -0700 <0xEthereum_> @AndrewDARMACAP @econoar @VitalikButerin @dannyryan @hudsonjameson Mini-conspiracy theory: the whales know eip1559 could be the straw that breaks the camels back in regards to ETH price takeoff, but they want to accumulate as much as they can before ETH2 launch this Summer. So they don’t publicly push launching it on ETH1. I mean, smart right?🤪 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1253741165544763394 2020-04-24 10:42:41 -0700 <DeFi_Dad> @Billy_Luedtke Wen EIP1559 moon bro? | 0 replies 1 retweets 8 likes | |
| 1253749196261228544 2020-04-24 11:14:36 -0700 <econoar> @Dogetoshi ETH is oil actually can be somewhat relevant again after eip-1559 since some eth will actually be burnt. | 2 replies 0 retweets 7 likes | |
| 1253751290628202496 2020-04-24 11:22:55 -0700 <Dogetoshi> With EIP-1559 you burn ETH. If ETH is money, you're burning money. https://t.co/PRGyxvs0P2 | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1253751580551249920 2020-04-24 11:24:05 -0700 <ethereumita> @econoar @Dogetoshi any news about eip1559 integration ? Berlin ? | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1253760171458744322 2020-04-24 11:58:13 -0700 <econoar> The first EIP-1559 Implementers' Call will occur next week. https://t.co/5jum6duLyO | 10 replies 36 retweets 170 likes | |
| 1253766034806337536 2020-04-24 12:21:31 -0700 <Arthur_0x> EIP-1559 need to happen so that there is a direct mechanism to feedback the fundamentals of the network into the value of ETH itself. | 1 replies 0 retweets 28 likes | |
| 1253820026513027073 2020-04-24 15:56:03 -0700 <PaulESamson> Vitalik Buterin Dismissed #Bitfly’s Claims Over #EIP1559 of Jeopardize Network Security - #Blockchain #ETH #Ethereum #EthereumNews #Multilinear #ZKPsSNARKs - https://t.co/lfCvyMWHZB | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1253821666091692038 2020-04-24 16:02:34 -0700 <ncchan93> @_Checkmatey_ @WestCoastWalka @CryptoGour @TrustlessState @RyanSAdams Can you explain more? Why will inflation be high if the prices rise exponentially, more ppl will stake even with low yield. And with eip 1559 burn wouldn't that eventually cancel out? | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1253822303848165376 2020-04-24 16:05:06 -0700 <_Checkmatey_> @ncchan93 @WestCoastWalka @CryptoGour @TrustlessState @RyanSAdams The curve is exponential. 1 eth becomes 1.1 --> 1.5 --> 3 etc. More ETH in circulation == more issuance to keep the same %ROI. EIP1559 is assumption that needs to be tested in the wild. I suspect it will be exactly the same effect as BTC fees, USD cost prohibitive for avg user. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1253836504591458305 2020-04-24 17:01:32 -0700 <ColeGotTweets> EIP-1559 will drastically improve the economics of $ETH by burning a portion of ETH in every transaction. When implemented, Ethereum network usage will result in direct value accrual. | 7 replies 32 retweets 179 likes | |
| 1253841900165115905 2020-04-24 17:22:58 -0700 <tokenstate> @econoar EIP-1559 🔥🔥🔥 | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1253905630018109444 2020-04-24 21:36:13 -0700 <BTCstJournal> Vitalik Buterin Dismissed Bitfly’s Claims Over EIP1559 of Jeopardize Network Security https://t.co/DKlXHf6rki #bitcoin https://t.co/xYVtnYvth1 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1253959731170799617 2020-04-25 01:11:12 -0700 <9dai_5> Ethereumにおけるガス代の大幅削減（ベースとチップに分ける考え方）を提案して話題を読んでいたEIP-1559について、日本時間4/30 23:00（JST）から実装を行う人達による議論が開始するようですね。 | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1254000716890292225 2020-04-25 03:54:03 -0700 <edmundedgar> Somehow in Ethereum economics both printing money and burning it (EIP1559) and printing money and giving it away (beacon chain staking) will make the number go up | 2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1254010330428182528 2020-04-25 04:32:15 -0700 <fnietom> It is 2020 and Ethereum people still don't understand the purpose of tx fees! Or why burning them is a bad idea. https://t.co/UBCrurdZRg EIP-1559 is a clear example of the Rube Goldberg machine nightmare Ethereum represents. | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1254011442497564672 2020-04-25 04:36:40 -0700 <intcryptonews> EIP 1559 (gas burning) Implementation Call Next Week! International CryptoCurrency News https://t.co/w7yiijbJrm | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1254011553508179968 2020-04-25 04:37:07 -0700 <veliko_test3> EIP 1559 (gas burning) Implementation Call Next Week! https://t.co/esYJJiisxI | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1254058431419465730 2020-04-25 07:43:23 -0700 <r_Ethereum> EIP 1559 (gas burning) Implementation Call Next Week! #Ethereum https://t.co/8M7fSN6P4L | 0 replies 1 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1254059268648701952 2020-04-25 07:46:43 -0700 <bigrkg> After #Ethereum 2.0 upgrade, The scarcity and demand of #Ether will depend on these 3 pillars : 1 - Staked ETH: The amount of Ether that is being staked to the network 2 - Burnt ETH: The amount and rate of Ether that has been/is being burnt in transaction fees. ( #EIP1559 ) | 1 replies 1 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1254072730736930817 2020-04-25 08:40:13 -0700 <Tetranode> @alexgausman @edmundedgar https://t.co/meOtZBrhJM @edmundedgar Fee burning has always been planned as part of 2.0's architecture. I recall @drakefjustin mentioning that 2.0 phase 1 will feature the equivalent of EIP-1559. https://t.co/qZM4iGyvyS | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1254073442829324291 2020-04-25 08:43:02 -0700 <NcsVentures> #NetworkSecurity | #computernetworks | Vitalik Buterin Dismissed Bitfly’s Claims Over EIP1559 of Jeopardize Network Security https://t.co/t2u0e45p61 https://t.co/jMYqzdqnqA | 0 replies 1 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1254078343324065793 2020-04-25 09:02:31 -0700 <cryptodiario> @ck_SNARKs @Fiskantes would boost the tx fee market in Ethereum, increase validator returns (or offset the dilution ratio if fee burns are approved via eip1559), creating a positive feedback loop which will push the price of ETH higher. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1254142607623503873 2020-04-25 13:17:53 -0700 <ChainLinkGod> @Foobazzler @chainlink @AaveAave It will be all of them :) Just like how the value of Ether will come from PoS, EIP1559, and DeFi lockup, the value of Link will come from staking, payments, and DeFi lockup Higher price = higher economic bandwidth | 0 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1254172803865235456 2020-04-25 15:17:52 -0700 <PiPrimePi> @danheld I have high hopes for Eth. I have a half position in size, and am long. EIP-1559 reminds of when we were kids playing games we made up and changed the rules as we went along because we didn’t know anything about making up games. @DanHeld is spot on here. Kiddies playing. | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1254183563722919942 2020-04-25 16:00:37 -0700 <tokenstate> @jimbo_mr @econoar Validators not miners, are highly incentivized to only accept EIP-1559 b/c of their ETH stake. This is extremely bullish for the price of ETH. | 1 replies 0 retweets 8 likes | |
| 1254196965157601281 2020-04-25 16:53:53 -0700 <AlexMasmej> Yet another reason, beyond EIP-1559, stablecoin trading volume exploding, ETH 2 industry-level excitement, personal tokens, future, derivatives etc etc the bullish list NEVER ends This is not not financial advice: ETH will be the single best investment of the decade, beating VC | 0 replies 4 retweets 17 likes | |
| 1254198984056336384 2020-04-25 17:01:54 -0700 <nicksdjohnson> Everyone is talking about EIP 1559 again, but I still haven't seen a satisfactory analysis that shows it will function as desired. | 7 replies 7 retweets 43 likes | |
| 1254208967154241536 2020-04-25 17:41:34 -0700 <RichardHeartWin> Satoshi built the first #crypto #Pumpamentals into #Bitcoin with the reducing inflation rate every 4 years. #Ethereum is working on catching up to HEX, trying to build staking and coin burning (eip-1559.) They know programmed scaricty pumps price. HEX is just ahead. | 3 replies 8 retweets 65 likes | |
| 1254212903546187777 2020-04-25 17:57:13 -0700 <0xTycoon> @nicksdjohnson Indeed. EIP-1559 is also in the ETH 2.0 spec. Anyhow, even if miners would be able to drive down the base fee, the big advantage would be that wallets would be able to accurately estimate the gas price. Also, the "tip" could be hidden from the user. | 2 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1254214287049936896 2020-04-25 18:02:42 -0700 <garenontheblock> @econoar How does EIP-1559 mitigate against txns that send additional value via smart contract, Eth or tokens, to an address owned by a validator? Especially wrapped in a stark... | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1254216493094461440 2020-04-25 18:11:28 -0700 <edmundedgar> @nicksdjohnson I've been thinking of writing up an EIP for miner-driven fee reform: Same as EIP1559, but pool basefee among miners. Fun thing about this is it can be soft-forked without the cooperation of users or devs, either without EIP1559 or with it, but set under the target as you suggest | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1254228831583559687 2020-04-25 19:00:30 -0700 <Teutonium> @Febrocas @econoar Miners aren't taking ETH, if I'm not mistaken EIP 1559 burns tx fees, so miners/stakers are not getting that ETH. And if other tokens were used in EIP1559 it would reduce the other token's supply and the network wouldn't get more secure because of ETH burning. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1254235687550955521 2020-04-25 19:27:45 -0700 <BitcoinCartoon> @KeiserReport @realmaxkeiser Are you up to date on EIP 1559 burn? https://t.co/LG9z5MjtP1 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1254288755491401728 2020-04-25 22:58:37 -0700 <the_crypto_feed> /r/ethereum: eip 1559 (gas burning) implementation call next week! https://t.co/ff9etlaYR4 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1254325938806013953 2020-04-26 01:26:22 -0700 <_Checkmatey_> Doesnt EIP1559 just enrich stakers further? Analogue to today's cronny capitalism: - Holders are diluted by inflation - the poor spend and thus burn - the elite (stakers) accumulate at low cost - the elite set and change the rules Serious question, trying to see how it's fair | 3 replies 0 retweets 20 likes | |
| 1254325944937897985 2020-04-26 01:26:24 -0700 <Eth_Dev_News> The first EIP-1559 Implementers' Call will occur next week. https://t.co/DR3ac1n3e5 | 0 replies 1 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1254331997339766784 2020-04-26 01:50:27 -0700 <DomainAddress4u> EIP 1559 (gas burning) Implementation Call Next Week! via /r/ethereum https://t.co/fbz1lw0I4c hot 🔥 in #reddit #ethereum #eth #crypto | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1254410517390733313 2020-04-26 07:02:27 -0700 <CHalexov2016> We really need eip 1559 proposal dear @VitalikButerin @ethereumJoseph @preston_vanloon @prylabs @ethnimbus @econoar @dannyryan @benjaminion_xyz with @ethereum & @Consensys .. lets burn all new born/staked $eth #ethereum ... lets supply stay under 120 milion forever. 🤝🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1254411301813653504 2020-04-26 07:05:34 -0700 <auryn_macmillan> @nicksdjohnson I made a @BurnSignal poll for this, you should weigh in their as well. "Should Ethereum implement a fee market change for ETH 1.0 (EIP-1559)?" It's currently pointing to "YES", but there aren't many votes yet, so the outcome could easily be changed. https://t.co/dUVUNuT0IX | 1 replies 1 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1254424508561190913 2020-04-26 07:58:03 -0700 <TrustlessState> @genoplivning @ercwl @zackvoell EIP 1559 is far from a pumpamental feature, it’s motivation is actually simply just better UX with paying transaction fees | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1254438914053468160 2020-04-26 08:55:18 -0700 <AndreMosin> EIP 1559 esta chegando! ETH vai pra lua. Quer saber mais? assista esse vídeo que eu explico como isso influencia: https://t.co/HmdJDv3TEV | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1254439053342244865 2020-04-26 08:55:51 -0700 <stonecoldpat0> @edmundedgar I've spent some time thinking about EIP-1559, but I'm not convinced it will do anything meaningful by burning coins. I feel like the "tip" would just go up. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1254453577923223553 2020-04-26 09:53:34 -0700 <gadikian> @econoar Got a link to eip-1559? What's it do? Eth2 is.... Shit. Kinda interesting. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1254455194009718786 2020-04-26 09:59:59 -0700 <tokenstate> @masterofzoom1 I believe staking alone will drive it past ATH + the massive utility value w/ fee burning EIP-1559 | 3 replies 0 retweets 8 likes | |
| 1254455838267359232 2020-04-26 10:02:33 -0700 <dankrad> @paddypisa @edmundedgar The point is that there are two different limits -- peak capacity (max throughput of nodes) and average capacity. EIP1559 aims for better usage of *average* capacity. You cannot run the network continuously at peak capacity, because then nodes could *never* catch up! | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1254456089619451904 2020-04-26 10:03:33 -0700 <dankrad> @paddypisa @edmundedgar You fundamentally misunderstand how EIP1559 works. If people keep increasing tips to make block proposers squeeze more transactions in, the block fees (which are burnt) will rise *indefinitely*. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1254463145969664001 2020-04-26 10:31:35 -0700 <dankrad> @paddypisa @edmundedgar There are two things wrong with you analysis. 1. EIP1559 will prevent fees from even getting that high, because pricing is based on average demand over a longer timescale, not peak demand 2. EIP1559 makes sure that it is always a net positive for a miner to include a transaction | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1254487972235431936 2020-04-26 12:10:14 -0700 <dankrad> @paddypisa @edmundedgar @Avivz78 @nirenzang Can you please explain to me what advantage this idea has compared to EIP1559? | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1254490881945714688 2020-04-26 12:21:48 -0700 <dankrad> @paddypisa @edmundedgar @Avivz78 @nirenzang But EIP1559 will achieve the same! That's what FEECAP is for! And it deals with sudden shocks better because it allows some blocks to grow above the target size! | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1254491928495886339 2020-04-26 12:25:57 -0700 <dankrad> @paddypisa @edmundedgar @Avivz78 @nirenzang Also here the EIP1559 mechanism is superior: It makes miner revenue almost independent from transactions. As it should be, because security should not depend on transaction fees. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1254522483027382272 2020-04-26 14:27:22 -0700 <undefinedza> @ericjuta EIP1559 🤞 | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1254604224521854977 2020-04-26 19:52:11 -0700 <JayeHarrill> EIP-1559 is cool https://t.co/KquQtYnRK1 | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1254697423139635201 2020-04-27 02:02:31 -0700 <dankrad> @edmundedgar @paddypisa @Avivz78 @nirenzang Assume you mean this? "Equally, Ethereum could lose currency value, reducing the value of block rewards, but still be a viable system thanks to transaction fees." That seems incorrect to me. If we end up with this state in EIP1559, we would just increase block rewards... | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1254707805115695105 2020-04-27 02:43:46 -0700 <edmundedgar> @dankrad @paddypisa @Avivz78 @nirenzang On 2: I'm not advocating zero block rewards, I'm saying having both is more robust. However to fix EIP1559 I'd propose a fee pool (fees spread among miners of the next x blocks) which also helps with the "what if nobody wants to move the chain forward" problem | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1254713222382436353 2020-04-27 03:05:18 -0700 <dankrad> @edmundedgar @paddypisa @Avivz78 @nirenzang It's better than status quo, but how is it better than "vanilla" EIP1559? That doesn't have this instability. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1254714785884590081 2020-04-27 03:11:31 -0700 <edmundedgar> @dankrad @paddypisa @Avivz78 @nirenzang Vanilla EIP1559 has the problem we've been discussing, where the cost of security may become insufficient at any moment because ETH drops and/or value-transacted goes up, and a hard fork response is too slow. Only fees bad, only block rewards bad, having both is more robust. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1254715624556822528 2020-04-27 03:14:51 -0700 <dankrad> @edmundedgar @paddypisa @Avivz78 @nirenzang Well, but your supposed "solution" doesn't work! It creates an unstable chain. You just showed that they *both* don't solve the problem. So it's still strictly inferior to vanilla EIP1559. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1254716780930412549 2020-04-27 03:19:26 -0700 <edmundedgar> @dankrad @paddypisa @Avivz78 @nirenzang You risk an unstable chain in the extreme case where the block reward is extremely teensy, and X is too small. But without fees (ie vanilla EIP1559 working as intended) if the block reward is extremely teensy, you're already dead. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1254717649721995264 2020-04-27 03:22:53 -0700 <dankrad> @edmundedgar @paddypisa @Avivz78 @nirenzang Well if they both don't work then you can't really claim your supposed solution is better. Make a table of all the possible regimes, and your solution has to work in at least one case where EIP1559 doesn't in order to not be *strictly inferior*. And, consider that if ETH drops... | 2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1254748217054392320 2020-04-27 05:24:21 -0700 <0xTycoon> @G_maker $BTC has nothing going for it except the halving. Issuance reduction to 2% $ETH issuance will go to below 1% once ETH 2.0 launches. On top of constant #defi growth, staking, and EIP-1559... The choice from an investment point of view is simple. 😉 | 0 replies 1 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1254776509337759751 2020-04-27 07:16:47 -0700 <dankrad> @edmundedgar @paddypisa @Avivz78 @nirenzang Basically, you have to show that for a given block reward B, adding transaction fees epsilon increases stability for some range of epsilons. Unless you can do that, I think all epsilons lead to less security. And thus EIP1559 is the most stable rule. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1254777189410590724 2020-04-27 07:19:29 -0700 <colingplatt> @josephdelong @pyskell DeFi won't be sustainable unless ProgPoW is activated, also EIP-1559 will kill DeFi | 2 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1254809444069842950 2020-04-27 09:27:39 -0700 <colingplatt> Is there an anti EIP-1559 contingent, if so what's the hypothesis? | 1 replies 1 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1254882948651732994 2020-04-27 14:19:44 -0700 <Sol68635937> @chrisbelltoken 3 more days: EIP1559 implementer call on April 30. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1254908429103255554 2020-04-27 16:00:59 -0700 <Consensys> If you're working on UX around gas management, keep EIP-1559 on your radar. #Ethereum https://t.co/SB5T7HR5IB | 1 replies 13 retweets 30 likes | |
| 1254955378938228737 2020-04-27 19:07:32 -0700 <POVCryptoPod> Just finished recording with @VitalikButerin! - Competition to be internet money. Exists? - Immaculate conception vs ICO. Big deal? - EIP1559 economics. Poor for growth? - Asset serving the chain vs Chain serving the asset? - Hardforks and Ethereum. When breakup? Out tomorrow! https://t.co/baitYDVVEE | 7 replies 26 retweets 168 likes | |
| 1255008246546530304 2020-04-27 22:37:37 -0700 <CHalexov2016> Yes #ethereum need EIP -1559 dear @ethereum @Consensys and all team around @dannyryan @VitalikButerin @ethereumJoseph @prylabs @ethnimbus @benjaminion_xyz @preston_vanloon @econoar and other. 🤝🕷🕷🕷🕷 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1255085498604888065 2020-04-28 03:44:35 -0700 <CHalexov2016> Yeah soon #ethereum $eth turn into eth2 with great EIP-1559 proposal 🤝🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷 @prylabs @ethnimbus @dannyryan @ethereum @Consensys @VitalikButerin @preston_vanloon @econoar and other.. well done! Few bilion eth2 wallets in few years 🤝🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷... | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1255118275547025410 2020-04-28 05:54:50 -0700 <DarkCryptoLord> 1/ If there's one coin that I'm extremely bullish on, it's $ETH - the King of all Shitcoins. A lesser known event that is gonna happen on the 30th April is the EIP1559 implementation call. https://t.co/stHHFdrpr5 | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1255118277803569158 2020-04-28 05:54:51 -0700 <DarkCryptoLord> 2/If EIP1559 gets implemented, it's a new era for $ETH as the current gas fee system we knew would be over. Tl;dr - Base fee will replace auction-based fees and they are always burned after a successful tx. https://t.co/RUaUQOtdjT https://t.co/nXmsaOEsTB | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1255135503008927750 2020-04-28 07:03:17 -0700 <POVCryptoPod> - Do we ever calcify Ethereum? - EIP 1559 and its impact on Ether monetary policy. Better than Austrian economics? - Does the asset serve the chain or does the chain serve the asset? - Does the growth of Blockchains come at the cost of Governments? - Sovereign Individual stuff! | 1 replies 1 retweets 6 likes | |
| 1255166399678345216 2020-04-28 09:06:04 -0700 <lastmjs> @dondaryl20 @boxmining @prylabs The inflation on Ethereum 2 may be between 0-1%. Look into the staking rewards charts and EIP-1559 https://t.co/2UzN8SKiMx | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1255222031949455368 2020-04-28 12:47:07 -0700 <Andre96190713> @Altcoinbuzzio EIP 1559 | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1255225266579935235 2020-04-28 12:59:59 -0700 <Andre96190713> @Altcoinbuzzio EIP-1559 Implementers' Call 1 The purpose of this call is for various teams/individuals working on aspects of EIP-1559 to discuss the implementation plan and next steps to move the EIP forward. Meeting Date/Time: Thursday 30 Avril 2020, 14:00 UTC Meeting Duration 1.5 hours | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1255270170353905664 2020-04-28 15:58:25 -0700 <0x_Lucas> Things that consume economic bandwidth: - DeFi - DAOs - Staking - EIP 1559 Ethereum’s gonna need a lot of it Maybe even trillions... https://t.co/grEKq9NmIb | 0 replies 1 retweets 6 likes | |
| 1255332342148878339 2020-04-28 20:05:27 -0700 <adamscochran> 25/109 Those early returns don't account for EIP-1559 burning, or increase in ETH price. And as we know, ETH2.0's roll out will cause some serious price action: https://t.co/WnGzIzeLzF | 1 replies 5 retweets 59 likes | |
| 1255360755509198850 2020-04-28 21:58:22 -0700 <DeFi_Dad> @iampickleband @VitalikButerin @RyanSAdams @hosseeb @sassal0x @TrustlessState @spencernoon @mrjasonchoi @ethereumJoseph Oh oh I know! ETH is a SoV and it’s decreasing Minimum Necessary Issuance along with EIP1559 will further ensure its scarcity, and have effects on the price. And these realities are clearly not priced in as Ethereum continues going parabolic in utility while price is flat.👇🏼 https://t.co/zcVkCZXqEF | 1 replies 1 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1255364435599863810 2020-04-28 22:12:59 -0700 <TrustlessState> @DeFi_Dad @iampickleband @VitalikButerin @RyanSAdams @hosseeb @sassal0x @spencernoon @mrjasonchoi @ethereumJoseph If validators are not selling any new ETH, then there is no more ETH being added to the supply, and we can effectively assume ETHs supply is then capped. Then, we can start talking about ETH burn in EIP1559, and then ETH deposited into DeFi. | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1255482954261954568 2020-04-29 06:03:56 -0700 <CHalexov2016> Please vote YES for EIP -1559 #etherrum that will happen 30. April dear @preston_vanloon @VitalikButerin @ethereumJoseph @dannyryan @econoar @ethnimbus @prylabs @sassal0x @RyanSAdams @Consensys @ethereum and other team that will vote. #ethereum $eth really need it.. 🤝🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷 | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1255545623442386945 2020-04-29 10:12:58 -0700 <DarkCryptoLord> $ETH +12.5% Let's frigging get back to $300 before Vitalik implements EIP1559 burning protocol! https://t.co/cpUs2QsUt3 | 0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1255838644503543809 2020-04-30 05:37:19 -0700 <veliko_test3> Vitalik discusses EIP 1559, Bitcoin versus Ethereum in the future, the use of Ether as money and more on POV podcast. https://t.co/9pDXKnDPxh | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1255840191480311808 2020-04-30 05:43:28 -0700 <r_Ethereum> Vitalik discusses EIP 1559, Bitcoin versus Ethereum in the future, the use of Ether as money and more on POV podcast. #Ethereum https://t.co/hFySB5CpHk | 0 replies 1 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1255852443050655744 2020-04-30 06:32:09 -0700 <TimBeiko> The first @ethereum EIP-1559 call is happening in ~30 minutes 🎉 We'll have different client teams working on the EIP come together to share progress and potential next steps. There will also be a counter-proposal presented ( https://t.co/pAOTlUuZjf) 👀 | 3 replies 37 retweets 145 likes | |
| 1255853777653059586 2020-04-30 06:37:27 -0700 <CHalexov2016> Lets go @ethereum EIP -1559 proposal voting. Thanks @TimBeiko @VitalikButerin @preston_vanloon @econoar @RyanSAdams and other... we need that proposal 🤝🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷 #ethereum | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1255856289495822337 2020-04-30 06:47:26 -0700 <profits_bitcoin> $BTC Vitalik discusses EIP 1559, Bitcoin versus Ethereum in the future, the use of Ether as money and more on POV podcast. https://t.co/OHkYUQopXb https://t.co/vmrUeDdzAo | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1255861810378551298 2020-04-30 07:09:23 -0700 <CHalexov2016> @TimBeiko @ethereum @VitalikButerin @preston_vanloon @econoar @RyanSAdams So eip1559 will be add yo eth 100%? | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1255862171726155776 2020-04-30 07:10:49 -0700 <LUKACACIC> burn $ETH 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 #EIP1559 | 6 replies 9 retweets 106 likes | |
| 1255862207180652546 2020-04-30 07:10:57 -0700 <LUKACACIC> @TimBeiko @ethereum burn $ETH 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 #EIP1559 | 0 replies 0 retweets 11 likes | |
| 1255871164448194560 2020-04-30 07:46:33 -0700 <jarzoombek> @RyanSAdams EIP - 1559 is about burning fees? Could you please write few words about it? | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1255872473444352000 2020-04-30 07:51:45 -0700 <RyanSAdams> @jarzoombek Yes. Here you go! EIP1559 narrative overview: https://t.co/4AaR3tpZRQ How it's a core pillar of ETH fundamentals: https://t.co/HiHFiXrnyA Podcast version of the above: https://t.co/Zje5FYBzQh | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1256122029780152321 2020-05-01 00:23:24 -0700 <DomainAddress4u> Vitalik discusses EIP 1559, Bitcoin versus Ethereum in the future, the use of Ether as money and more on POV podcast. via /r/ethereum https://t.co/uMYsvqdPCA hot 🔥 in #reddit #ethereum #eth #crypto | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1256138380624068608 2020-05-01 01:28:22 -0700 <0x_dvd> @at0mcrypto @iDecentralized A lot of those are transactions with extremely low gas fees that have been sitting there a long time. They get processed slowly. There is scaling with layer 2 solutions already and sharping WIP. Gas fee issues will also be improved with EIP 1559 | 2 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1256141004408676354 2020-05-01 01:38:48 -0700 <the_crypto_feed> /r/ethereum: vitalik discusses eip 1559, bitcoin versus ethereum in the future, the use of ether as money and more on pov podcast. https://t.co/Cyxcnr8XBv | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1256242736539283456 2020-05-01 08:23:02 -0700 <TimBeiko> Next up is my update from the EIP-1559 implementers' call. You can find it on Twitter: https://t.co/cm2xq4m1T6 | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1256264299929952256 2020-05-01 09:48:44 -0700 <keegan_selby> @Billy_Luedtke You covered this but worth calling out explicitly: EIP 1559 introducing a burn mechanism that could flip the issuance rate deflationary. Burning the majority of ETH in the transaction fee would increase scarcity for all ETH holders equally, rather than just benefitting validators | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1256308378348908546 2020-05-01 12:43:53 -0700 <danfinlay> While I appreciated being heard with open ears, I feel bad that I've dragged out my criticisms with eip-1559 so long. I want to either strongly articulate my issue or get out of the way. I think I may have boiled down to an essential problem: | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1256308393272197121 2020-05-01 12:43:56 -0700 <danfinlay> This relates not just to eip-1559, but to the earlier paper by Vitalik, where he suggests a type of uniform-price auction that accepts the lowest bid price: https://t.co/yn4wS5XODc | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1256385250768203776 2020-05-01 17:49:20 -0700 <CCassets> EIP1559がEth2.0でも適用できるだろうし、実質的にデフレモデルになるとも言える。 それも需給循環という自然作用によって。 デジタル資源としてのEtherの供給モデルは、新しい秩序と価値観を提案することになっていくと思う。 | 0 replies 1 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1256586331297329152 2020-05-02 07:08:22 -0700 <4Tendies> @sassal0x All I’m gonna say is this is why we need eip 1559. Projects that piggy back off eth should pay fees and increase the value of the underlying blockchain :) | 0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1256617737385697283 2020-05-02 09:13:10 -0700 <econoar> EIP-1559 call summary ICYMI. | 0 replies 7 retweets 23 likes | |
| 1256672285538357248 2020-05-02 12:49:55 -0700 <hausbauss> @DavidStOnge @skwp @nic__carter @saifedean @edstromandrew @pierre_rochard @francispouliot_ @brave 1/ EIP 1559 will ensure that a fraction of the transaction fee is permanently burned, so yes it is a consumable asset. But you can also loan it out and earn interest, making it a capital asset. And SC value accrues to the underlying protocol, making ETH a SoV. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1256901710196248577 2020-05-03 04:01:34 -0700 <roccodallas> Ethereum: Will implementation of 'EIP 1559' solve coin's monetary policy issues? https://t.co/4qpDwc8iZx #Bitcoin #Ethereum #Technology #Adoption https://t.co/IC9aucgm4b | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1256902098857459718 2020-05-03 04:03:07 -0700 <CryptoAmb> Ethereum: Will implementation of 'EIP 1559' solve coin's monetary policy issues? https://t.co/NxIdV3pn9s | 0 replies 3 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1256902337144270849 2020-05-03 04:04:03 -0700 <thecryptokeepr> Ethereum: Will implementation of 'EIP 1559' solve coin's monetary policy issues? >>@ https://t.co/fsd3kaHw5I || #btc #eth #xrp #altcoin #crypto | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1256903433082351628 2020-05-03 04:08:25 -0700 <ambcrypto_sp> Ethereum: ¿La implementación del 'EIP 1559' resolverá los problemas de política monetaria de la moneda? https://t.co/YR0iVGDcY8 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1256903968166260736 2020-05-03 04:10:32 -0700 <thecsstreet> ◼️AMB Crypto | Ethereum: Will implementation of 'EIP 1559' solve coin's monetary policy issues? https://t.co/Gv8lP1Mtkk #Bitcoin #Ethereum #Technology https://t.co/MH6e9iqj0g | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1256904836416548865 2020-05-03 04:13:59 -0700 <PaulESamson> #Ethereum: Will implementation of 'EIP 1559' solve coin's monetary policy issues? - #Adoption #Bitcoin #HideCryptopanic #News #Social #Technology #TradingView - https://t.co/bXwK1tnEtR | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1256906698507399170 2020-05-03 04:21:23 -0700 <CryptoAbsorbed> Ethereum: Will implementation of 'EIP 1559' solve coin's monetary policy issues? https://t.co/jQe2Lie5cf | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1256910086594838528 2020-05-03 04:34:51 -0700 <Coinboard> Ethereum: Will implementation of 'EIP 1559' solve coin's monetary policy issues? https://t.co/0DlbjlVe5u via @CryptoAmb #cryptocurrency #bitcoin https://t.co/IAuuPqxp48 | 0 replies 1 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1256914953673617408 2020-05-03 04:54:11 -0700 <CryptoNewswire> Ethereum: Will implementation of 'EIP 1559' solve coin's monetary policy issues? - https://t.co/SgdIoJgnS3 $BTC $ETH #fintech #trading | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1256916553053777920 2020-05-03 05:00:33 -0700 <thecsstreet> Ethereum: Will implementation of 'EIP 1559' solve coin's monetary policy issues? https://t.co/cAYPKfqz16 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1256916882705260546 2020-05-03 05:01:51 -0700 <blockcrypto1> Ethereum: Will implementation of 'EIP 1559' solve coin's monetary policy issues? - https://t.co/ujGvv42xR6 #trading-coin #btc #monero #hodl #cardano #eos #bch #steemit #blockcrypto https://t.co/zu7c5PA1Pe | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1256919823130529793 2020-05-03 05:13:32 -0700 <intcryptonews> Ethereum: Will implementation of 'EIP 1559' solve coin's monetary policy issues? International CryptoCurrency News https://t.co/ElihwiIP6X | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1256920004957745152 2020-05-03 05:14:16 -0700 <bitcoinschannel> Ethereum: Will implementation of 'EIP 1559' solve coin's monetary policy issues? - https://t.co/W5fF5PqP3U | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1256922584693772296 2020-05-03 05:24:31 -0700 <worldnewsdotcom> #Ethereum: Will implementation of 'EIP 1559' solve coin's monetary policy issues? #MonetaryPolicy #BTC #Cryptocurrency https://t.co/p04kQHwJPO https://t.co/4Q7jNcbbNG | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1256929023470571521 2020-05-03 05:50:06 -0700 <hausbauss> @DavidStOnge @skwp @nic__carter @saifedean @edstromandrew @pierre_rochard @francispouliot_ Not quite. The commodity asset properties of ETH come from EIP 1559, which has yet to be implemented. The fees right now are directly parallel to those found on BTC or anything on top But with POS, the dominant character of ETH is not as a commodity but rather capital asset. | 2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1256931649712865280 2020-05-03 06:00:32 -0700 <MonkeyCrypto> Ethereum: Will implementation of ‘EIP 1559’ solve coin’s monetary policy issues?: Ethereum, unlike Bitcoin, does not have a fixed supply. While some see this as a disadvantage for the coin, many others believe that Ethereum’s minimum necessary issuance… https://t.co/slt1nnqGRH https://t.co/RWUPiYjLoN | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1256933828406530049 2020-05-03 06:09:12 -0700 <BitcoinFNewsES> Ethereum: ¿La implementación del ‘EIP 1559’ resolverá los problemas de política monetaria de la moneda? https://t.co/JJxQPdpGnW https://t.co/RJXigxdOQE | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1256966714719440902 2020-05-03 08:19:52 -0700 <johnmorganFL> #Ethereum: Will implementation of 'EIP 1559' solve coin's monetary policy issues? https://t.co/UmiwNo3uXB https://t.co/5hGT1egWeD | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1256975417044590592 2020-05-03 08:54:27 -0700 <Cartosys> @quantumflux88 @cctip_io You know my vote is Ethereum. There's ways around gas. EIP 1559 is coming and will address this. Or just virtually eliminate it with Layer 2. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1256976106139209728 2020-05-03 08:57:11 -0700 <Comp_Sciencee> Will implementation of ‘EIP 1559’ solve coin’s monetary policy issues? #Ethereum via https://t.co/vdaSz7XMf0 https://t.co/chRqiFIbJi | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1257019541059665920 2020-05-03 11:49:47 -0700 <Tian_A1> Ethereum : Will implementation of 'EIP 1559' solve #Coin's [ AMBCrypto ] ETH's concept of minimum viable issuance as the monetary policy raises a few questions . How can one determine what is minimally viable Is that even an . https://t.co/zPoNXafpnC | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1257200247245340672 2020-05-03 23:47:51 -0700 <pcaversaccio> A great FAQ for the EIP 1559 from @VitalikButerin. Give it a read! https://t.co/ckocSkUE9N | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1257202443630325761 2020-05-03 23:56:34 -0700 <r_Ethereum> A great FAQ for the EIP 1559 from Vitalik. #Ethereum https://t.co/iApbBLgMSi | 0 replies 2 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1257205089271513093 2020-05-04 00:07:05 -0700 <veliko_test3> A great FAQ for the EIP 1559 from Vitalik. https://t.co/l8nt5AQFWh | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1257205459452178432 2020-05-04 00:08:33 -0700 <CCassets> EIP1559 FAQ https://t.co/awzm80Gpos | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1257207460936536064 2020-05-04 00:16:31 -0700 <intcryptonews> A great FAQ for the EIP 1559 from Vitalik. International CryptoCurrency News https://t.co/yry5RXCKIK | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1257208454827171841 2020-05-04 00:20:28 -0700 <DomainAddress4u> A great FAQ for the EIP 1559 from Vitalik. via /r/ethereum https://t.co/kIEgamAQem hot 🔥 in #reddit #ethereum #eth #crypto | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1257237273759952897 2020-05-04 02:14:59 -0700 <GODofETH> EIP 1559 is a proposal to reform the Ethereum fee market: https://t.co/OPhiXP1O9O #ethereum #eth #eth2 | 0 replies 1 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1257301076094656512 2020-05-04 06:28:30 -0700 <RyanSAdams> Stablecoins are almost $10b now Bitcoin is $161b I think stablecoins could flippen Bitcoin in the coming years What asset would benefit from this? ETH With EIP1559 Ether becomes more scarce as stablecoins are used | 18 replies 47 retweets 216 likes | |
| 1257307278773911552 2020-05-04 06:53:09 -0700 <crypto_calf> Prediction: if EIP-1559 is implemented it will result in increased fees on Ethereum paid by users | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1257323689701371910 2020-05-04 07:58:22 -0700 <TonyCrypto130> @RyanSAdams Hey Ryan would you explain for us noobs what EIP-1559 brings about? | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1257350466306035715 2020-05-04 09:44:46 -0700 <D_i_L_j_A_L_E> @RyanSAdams Is EIP 1559 is Gasless & specifies as fix transaction cost protocol for Smart contracts ? | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1257356333852119051 2020-05-04 10:08:05 -0700 <econoar> This EIP-1559 FAQ by @VitalikButerin is great. https://t.co/O6XEfdMCNg | 2 replies 27 retweets 65 likes | |
| 1257357168715730950 2020-05-04 10:11:24 -0700 <CHalexov2016> Yeah EIP-1559 is coming! $eth #ethereum | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1257371105343438848 2020-05-04 11:06:46 -0700 <WolfHodl> @RyanSAdams I totally get what you are saying, but it is because of the EIP 1559 which will put ethereum inflation rate under 1%? | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1257392066381914113 2020-05-04 12:30:04 -0700 <aliatiia_> (a) Excitement about EIP1559 is at ATH (b) It's a very "close to the metal" EIP Therefore: more eyeballs on it r needed. Check this debate b/w @danfinlay & @dankrad. Agree w/ Dan: safety of 1559 has not yet been established beyond reasonable doubt https://t.co/oHeOjA4fdq | 1 replies 2 retweets 8 likes | |
| 1257392723612577795 2020-05-04 12:32:41 -0700 <dankrad> @aliatiia_ @danfinlay Nowhere in the debate was the safety of EIP1559 in doubt, was it? | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1257403867383332871 2020-05-04 13:16:58 -0700 <aliatiia_> @danfinlay @dankrad The reputational/PR hit the protocol takes if EIP1559 were to lead to miner collusion warrants using the "unsafe" label | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1257517531650125824 2020-05-04 20:48:37 -0700 <fezbox> @RyanSAdams Have we got a timeline for eip1559? What if eth 2 sees some delays. I hear so much about eip1559 but nothing around timelines. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1257605086114504704 2020-05-05 02:36:32 -0700 <0xTycoon> @BTC_JackSparrow If you must sell, then sell to $DAI, that way you won't have to leave the Ethereum ecosystem! Meanwhile, the rocket will continue on with the launch of phase 1 & 2, plus EIP-1559 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1257609962223595521 2020-05-05 02:55:54 -0700 <D_i_L_j_A_L_E> @RyanSAdams ETH Developers just fail the Big Bankers in Economic planning terms. EIP1559 is going to regulate the whole Economic model of Ethereum monetary system. Complicated to understand 4 guy like me, its sure it will benefit Users & maintain economics balance between Stakers & Issuance. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1257701453428404232 2020-05-05 08:59:28 -0700 <The3D_> If you would chose an EIP to be integrated tomorrow, which one would you choose and why the EIP-1559? | 1 replies 2 retweets 12 likes | |
| 1257978126707064832 2020-05-06 03:18:52 -0700 <ctuka> 【Vitalik: EIP 1559 Will Mitigate Three Problems Facing Ethereum】Ethereum co-founder Vitalik recently draft... https://t.co/EF4QKLNIzz | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1258020214664507393 2020-05-06 06:06:06 -0700 <samstargazer> Bah a simple swap on Ethereum takes ages despite putting in 15 gwei in gas fee. Hope EIP-1559 gets implemented soon and solves this issue. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1258021895049490432 2020-05-06 06:12:47 -0700 <aliatiia_> EIP1559 is risky because it "hardcodedly" entangles three fundamental knobs together: 1) fee market efficiency 2) block size elasticity 3) deflationary monetary policy Gotta decouple | 0 replies 1 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1258094825657663488 2020-05-06 11:02:35 -0700 <thecsstreet> How EIP 1559 Implementation Can Revolutionize Ethereum[ETH], Founder Vitalik Shares Key Benefits https://t.co/wKqi9weHZf | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1258095047972716545 2020-05-06 11:03:28 -0700 <CryptoNews2000> How EIP 1559 Implementation Can Revolutionize Ethereum[ETH], Founder Vitalik Shares Key Benefits http://coingape.com/vitalik-eip-1559-revolutionize-ethereum/ #Ethereum $ETH #EIP1559 #Proposal #Crypto #Blockchain | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1258095353309597699 2020-05-06 11:04:41 -0700 <thecryptokeepr> How EIP 1559 Implementation Can Revolutionize Ethereum[ETH], Founder Vitalik Shares Key Benefits >>@ https://t.co/sp8yQUcyGT || #btc #eth #xrp #altcoin #crypto https://t.co/ZJnqWIPDQ5 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1258096555862585347 2020-05-06 11:09:27 -0700 <CryptoBitsNews1> How EIP 1559 Implementation Can Revolutionize Ethereum[ETH], https://t.co/GzrpMtoP9n #Bitcoin #Bitcoinnews #BTC #Crypto #Cryptocurrency #Cryptonews #digitalcurrency #Ethereum #hodl #Litecoin | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1258110356389593088 2020-05-06 12:04:18 -0700 <CoinGapeMedia> How EIP 1559 Implementation Can Revolutionize #Ethereum, Founder @VitalikButerin Shares Key Benefits https://t.co/RYwZtk9esX | 0 replies 1 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1258123467158740992 2020-05-06 12:56:24 -0700 <PaulESamson> #Ethereum Co-founder Vitalik Buterin Drafts FAQ for #Ethereum’s EIP 1559 - #EIPEthereum #EIP1559 #EthereumsFeeModel #TransactionFee #Transactions - https://t.co/0W0wauOVEA | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1258138047226564608 2020-05-06 13:54:20 -0700 <DaoChemist> @AdamNasa55 @iDecentralized @DewayneCameron9 @ThroneOfCrypto @Richard_Crenna @Kohlhaas13 I like your analogy of blockchains as cars. In that analogy when you mention gas inefficiency which is currently the case indeed. have you looked at the EIP-1559? https://t.co/IQMSESWV9u | 2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1258154401912557568 2020-05-06 14:59:19 -0700 <BTCstJournal> How EIP 1559 Implementation Can Revolutionize Ethereum[ETH], Founder Vitalik Shares Key Benefits https://t.co/yDGPxtNP7D #bitcoin https://t.co/42iof3b0Sp | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1258193185718689793 2020-05-06 17:33:26 -0700 <scupytrooples> What do we want? EIP-1559. When do you want it? Forever ago. | 1 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1258248486975389696 2020-05-06 21:13:11 -0700 <johnmorganFL> How EIP 1559 Implementation Can Revolutionize #Ethereum[#ETH], Founder Vitalik Shares Key Benefits https://t.co/F5WGQRfxjX https://t.co/RLfeMhkZdq | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1258381972889636866 2020-05-07 06:03:36 -0700 <AttestantIO> Charting #Ethereum issuance: EIP-1559 and Ethereum 2 https://t.co/ux0WO2Trrq | 2 replies 8 retweets 15 likes | |
| 1258382869904441345 2020-05-07 06:07:10 -0700 <veliko_test3> Charting Ethereum issuance: EIP-1559 and Ethereum 2 https://t.co/Qj7pR7yyTr | 0 replies 2 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1258383666390216705 2020-05-07 06:10:20 -0700 <r_Ethereum> Charting Ethereum issuance: EIP-1559 and Ethereum 2 #Ethereum https://t.co/o4FLBc6raO | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1258672998984318986 2020-05-08 01:20:02 -0700 <cryptochan> #cryptochan Виталик Бутерин расписал положительное влияние EIP 1559 на экономику Ethereum https://t.co/sSGO9mMzxA | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1258713256564109312 2020-05-08 04:00:00 -0700 <ETHRobot> EIP 1559: The Unfettered Sovereignty of the ETH Economy. This change would allow Ethereum to scale to 1,000,000 tx/sec as a Proof of Work chain without any additional trust or compromise. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1258775645083090946 2020-05-08 08:07:55 -0700 <tokenstate> @nk1tz @keo @ck_SNARKs idk once staking & EIP-1559 w/ lower inflation = scarce High demand is more important imo. See the USD. No cap but worth trillions & trillion. demand > scarcity = higher market cap | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1258779152871612416 2020-05-08 08:21:51 -0700 <TrustlessState> What happens when 4+ companies commit to using less than 30% of Ethereum Blockspace? Include in your answer EIP 1559 | 2 replies 3 retweets 10 likes | |
| 1258820213505617920 2020-05-08 11:05:01 -0700 <TrustlessState> @LUKACACIC @RyanSAdams staking and EIP1559 are the maxigames | 0 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1258975621729759237 2020-05-08 21:22:33 -0700 <cryptor_net> Виталик Бутерин расписал положительное влияние EIP 1559 на экономику Ethereum https://t.co/uDV7KflwDH https://t.co/oKDwNtbsaj | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1258985936295165955 2020-05-08 22:03:32 -0700 <cyber_hokie> @favoredprisoner @Mario_Gibney @elliot_olds @VitalikButerin @hcarpach @safetyth1rd Vitalik couldn’t get eip867 or 999 through for fund recovery, and couldn’t get ProgPoW through if he tried. Vitalik hasn’t taken a position on an EIP except a technically related EIP in almost 2 years (exception being EIP1559 for fee market changes) | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1259195859863875584 2020-05-09 11:57:42 -0700 <GitcoinFeed> . • sastro6969@sastro6969 created Quest: Ethereum EIP 1559 Fee Market https://t.co/JUixZRozFO | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1259196716202389504 2020-05-09 12:01:06 -0700 <owocki> This @gitcoin Quest on EIP 1559 is a fun weekend time-killer (and learning experience)! https://t.co/lBu83gO0Fr https://t.co/u7YzugPI86 | 1 replies 4 retweets 8 likes | |
| 1259214013868634112 2020-05-09 13:09:50 -0700 <GitcoinFeed> . • NASI₿ @bild96 played Quest: Ethereum EIP 1559 Fee Market https://t.co/KSGex57P0o | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1259218400351526918 2020-05-09 13:27:16 -0700 <tokenstate> @cburniske @alexhevans The point still stands EOS has already achieve negative inflation rates after staking, something ETH is dreaming about w/ EIP-1559 & staking. ETH is great but don't forget to include EOS. See my previous tweet on comments. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1259223140187734016 2020-05-09 13:46:06 -0700 <tokenstate> EOS inflation: 1% (annual inflation rate) - REX fees (0.3%) - BP rebates (2.5%) = -1.8% ETH inflation 2.0: 1% (annual inflation rate) - validator fees? (3%) - EIP-1559 transaction burn fees? (0.5%) = -2.5% Both beat BTC with negative inflation rates. Efficiency of staking. | 1 replies 1 retweets 9 likes | |
| 1259233611984715776 2020-05-09 14:27:43 -0700 <GitcoinFeed> . • M Ariev P Guritno@nika-chan played Quest: Ethereum EIP 1559 Fee Market https://t.co/wSoV0aH6Vq | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1259236127396909056 2020-05-09 14:37:42 -0700 <GitcoinFeed> . • zak102@zak102 played Quest: Ethereum EIP 1559 Fee Market https://t.co/6MxpRTuO17 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1259241741221154817 2020-05-09 15:00:01 -0700 <GitcoinFeed> . • NASI₿ @bild96 beat Quest: Ethereum EIP 1559 Fee Market https://t.co/KSGex57P0o | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1259342361898807297 2020-05-09 21:39:51 -0700 <GitcoinFeed> . • saketjee@saketjee played Quest: Ethereum EIP 1559 Fee Market https://t.co/u9uMZxHmnk | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1259342574549995523 2020-05-09 21:40:41 -0700 <GitcoinFeed> . • saketjee@saketjee beat Quest: Ethereum EIP 1559 Fee Market https://t.co/u9uMZxHmnk | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1259347437883293696 2020-05-09 22:00:01 -0700 <GitcoinFeed> . Sunny Agrawal@sunny02091993 beat Quest: Ethereum EIP 1559 Fee Market https://t.co/CjvgRlDyYu | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1259361704065986560 2020-05-09 22:56:42 -0700 <GitcoinFeed> . • Mohamed Hayibor@mohamedhayibor played Quest: Ethereum EIP 1559 Fee Market https://t.co/4V8MQUOnRQ | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1259368500499374085 2020-05-09 23:23:43 -0700 <GitcoinFeed> . subilink@subilink played Quest: Ethereum EIP 1559 Fee Market https://t.co/Vsa5TEO6qE | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1259372554780733440 2020-05-09 23:39:49 -0700 <GitcoinFeed> . subilink@subilink beat Quest: Ethereum EIP 1559 Fee Market https://t.co/Vsa5TEO6qE | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1259505477932679168 2020-05-10 08:28:01 -0700 <IslandHunting> Really good overview of why EIP-1559 is important: https://t.co/thrQNDgr8v Note that I personally would like to see a larger "expansion factor" than 2x, maybe 4-5x under heavy load for up to 24 hours as that would greatly increase the UX of Ethereum on days like black Thursday. | 1 replies 8 retweets 25 likes | |
| 1259512786444357637 2020-05-10 08:57:03 -0700 <owocki> @IslandHunting EIP 1559 gitcoin quest, just launched yesterday https://t.co/JMFFaxG17d | 0 replies 1 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1259518712371187713 2020-05-10 09:20:36 -0700 <stonecoldpat0> @hkalodner @evan_van_ness @AttestantIO i see, gotcha. so if the total tx fee is burnt, then that should probably work ok? e.g. miners have an incentive to increase their % of all coins. but its important to note that something like EIP-1559 does not strictly do that. its still first priced auction with the tip. | 2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1259520051528507392 2020-05-10 09:25:55 -0700 <hkalodner> @paddypisa @evan_van_ness @AttestantIO Yeah 100% agreed that EIP-1559 has some pretty odd behavior. I’m sure you know more about it than I do. I think the only ratio that matters for the attacks in that paper would be the tx fees that only go to a particular miner compared to their reward from inflation funding | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1259528760799432704 2020-05-10 10:00:32 -0700 <stonecoldpat0> @hkalodner @evan_van_ness @AttestantIO for EIP-1559, the current proposal is that: - Deterministically increase the "base burn fee" as long as the blockchain remains congested. So a portion of the fee is burnt, and another portion of the fee is paid to the miner. So the choice opens up for the miner in that case | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1259679151595728896 2020-05-10 19:58:08 -0700 <edmundedgar> Good proposal by @MicahZoltu to unbundle the bit in EIP1559 that throws away the miner gas voting system and switches to BTC/BCH-style core-dev food-fighting: https://t.co/CUDVvDpZAM Doesn't reject that change outright, just moves it to its own EIP so we can decide on the merits | 1 replies 1 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1259780859420454912 2020-05-11 02:42:17 -0700 <Comp_Sciencee> Charting Ethereum issuance: EIP-1559 and Ethereum 2 #Ethereum #ux via https://t.co/vdaSz7Gbns https://t.co/dbFreTZblq | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1259898707614580736 2020-05-11 10:30:34 -0700 <Consensys> The @PegaSysEng team has been hard at work on EIP-1559. Here’s a short demo showing: #HyperledgerBesu, geth mining/processing 1559 blocks and transaction on a small local network. https://t.co/pUxex7Jc7b | 1 replies 11 retweets 45 likes | |
| 1259910404916068354 2020-05-11 11:17:03 -0700 <CHalexov2016> Yeah EIP 1559 for #ethereum $eth will be huge! Well done @PegaSysEng 🤝🕷🕷🕷🕷 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1259919084445204482 2020-05-11 11:51:32 -0700 <ConsenSysQuorum> Our team has been hard at work on EIP-1559 💪 Here’s a short demo showing #HyperledgerBesu and geth mining and processing 1559 blocks and transaction on a small local network ⛓️🎉 Expect more from us on this in the coming months 👀 https://t.co/XvAJNwQrn3 https://t.co/ywZY9XtSDG | 2 replies 21 retweets 56 likes | |
| 1259919728325296128 2020-05-11 11:54:06 -0700 <TimBeiko> Not all core devs spend their time tweeting 😛: @dimahledba has been working on EIP-1559 these past weeks and managed to set up a local testnet between Besu and Geth Party 🎉 Expect more progress on the EIP by the @PegaSysEng in the coming months 😁 | 2 replies 4 retweets 22 likes | |
| 1259919895669673987 2020-05-11 11:54:45 -0700 <CHalexov2016> Yeah! $eth with EIP-1559 proposal will be huge move! Well done @PegaSysEng | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1260028790752731137 2020-05-11 19:07:28 -0700 <GatheringGwei> @DegenSpartan @DeFiDude And then $2150 once they find out about EIP1559 and realise eth is more scarce than btc | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1260078166527242240 2020-05-11 22:23:40 -0700 <GitcoinFeed> . Satya Naveen Vysetty@vsatyanaveen played Quest: Ethereum EIP 1559 Fee Market https://t.co/y9axxvPZnz | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1260078445129691136 2020-05-11 22:24:47 -0700 <GitcoinFeed> . Satya Naveen Vysetty@vsatyanaveen beat Quest: Ethereum EIP 1559 Fee Market https://t.co/y9axxvPZnz | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1260095588684595201 2020-05-11 23:32:54 -0700 <_Checkmatey_> Question for ETH Bulls: Given you cannot presently interact with a single DeFi protocol for less that $0.50-$1.00 in fees, how does your mental model change regarding the system? - Clearly bullish for security - Bull case for ETH 2.0 (if it scales) - EIP1559 drives fees higher | 7 replies 2 retweets 8 likes | |
| 1260105815106531329 2020-05-12 00:13:32 -0700 <_Checkmatey_> @alexgausman Do you think that is an attractive proposition for newcomers? What happens when (not if) fees go up to $1.0? Tether traders will not let up as we enter a bull and it WILL outprice average folk....and that problem will a) be exacerbated by eip1559 and b) be the case for years. | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1260108550258343937 2020-05-12 00:24:24 -0700 <GatheringGwei> @hasufl @ProficieNtOCE With POS alone, issuance should be below 1%. Once EIP1559 is implemented, majority of fees will be burnt, likely bringing ETH close to 0% or even deflationary if the network is widely used. The cool part is that fees can remain low without sacrifing security. https://t.co/tjKqs2esmK | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1260118739435094017 2020-05-12 01:04:54 -0700 <thegrifft> Alternative thought to #eip1559, from @wor in https://t.co/rJPCYYj0go What if we used a #bondingcurve (gas as the token, #ETH in Reserve) to automatically set the #gasPrice. Thoughts? @simondlr @VitalikButerin @realLedgerwatch @econoar @mZargham @lkngtn @billyrennekamp | 0 replies 1 retweets 11 likes | |
| 1260126815986741249 2020-05-12 01:36:59 -0700 <GatheringGwei> @RalphClaytonUk Skip to 27:10 to hear our lord and saviour @VitalikButerin speak on the impact of EIP1559 https://t.co/KblsEkawgH | 1 replies 1 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1260157262116515841 2020-05-12 03:37:58 -0700 <GatheringGwei> @_Checkmatey_ Why do you believe EIP1559 will drive fees higher? It aims to reduce transaction fee volatility, and replace the first-price auction model governing the current fee market for transaction inclusion. Reference: https://t.co/YAL6FHWDjq https://t.co/7w3Liif8f2 | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1260256584971636736 2020-05-12 10:12:38 -0700 <GitcoinFeed> . mabelfincen@mabelfincen played Quest: EIP 1559 Fee Market https://t.co/8fR8D0IzLZ | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1260266651498381312 2020-05-12 10:52:38 -0700 <GitcoinFeed> . • twintbeast@twintbeast played Quest: EIP 1559 Fee Market https://t.co/NA7pBvqiGN | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1260298891884281857 2020-05-12 13:00:45 -0700 <GitcoinFeed> . Pooja Ranjan@poojaranjan beat Quest: Ethereum EIP 1559 Fee Market https://t.co/bH2ljfoGyg | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1260304930872516608 2020-05-12 13:24:45 -0700 <GitcoinFeed> . • NASI₿ @bild96 played Quest: EIP 1559 Fee Market https://t.co/KSGex57P0o | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1260315991227142144 2020-05-12 14:08:42 -0700 <GitcoinFeed> . • hanna Timur@hanaa8 played Quest: Ethereum EIP 1559 Fee Market https://t.co/ng62zvOsHy | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1260386490946711552 2020-05-12 18:48:50 -0700 <econoar> EIP-1559 fixes this. | 4 replies 4 retweets 36 likes | |
| 1260392509798117379 2020-05-12 19:12:45 -0700 <ChainLinkGod> @econoar *except during high network congestion where fees revert back to a highest price market Don't get me wrong, EIP-1559 is an absolute net positive for UX, network security, and tokenomics, it just doesn't solve all the headaches | 2 replies 0 retweets 9 likes | |
| 1260417106547531776 2020-05-12 20:50:30 -0700 <aliatiia_> 8/8 Of course this only works if the base protocol recognizes and accepts GAS tokens. Besides access to credit, tokenizing GAS can open a few doors when it comes to the fee market issues EIP1559 aims to tackle. But that's left for a future post. /fin | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1260464380963098627 2020-05-12 23:58:21 -0700 <ChainLinkGod> @econoar EIP-1559 helps prevent overpaying during normal network activity very true, but I still worry about edge cases where Ethereum network congestion causes massive gas price spikes and Chainlink nodes *have* to overpay to ensure updates get processed quickly https://t.co/Fk1NeUQzrS | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1260465069021900807 2020-05-13 00:01:05 -0700 <ChainLinkGod> @econoar Massive gas price spikes from network congestion directly correlates with massive price movements, which is the most crucial time for timely and reliable oracle updates! EIP-1559 unfortunately does not solve these edge cases | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1260484588457074688 2020-05-13 01:18:39 -0700 <GitcoinFeed> . • dawg@le-dawg played Quest: Ethereum EIP 1559 Fee Market https://t.co/EZRGPKphls | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1260503338644275203 2020-05-13 02:33:09 -0700 <nicksdjohnson> I don't want to dogpile James, but this is emblematic of the problems I see with this rush to implement and deploy EIP 1559. You absolutely cannot make a change like this by the seat of your pants; we should *know* the equilibrium strategies before we even start. | 3 replies 1 retweets 16 likes | |
| 1260504264830586880 2020-05-13 02:36:50 -0700 <stonecoldpat0> @nicksdjohnson i think the mechanism to self-inspect congestion is actually better for dispute processes. e.g. don't increment deadline if the network is congested. (I had an idea how to do that another way, but the approach in EIP-1559 works too) | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1260506398754029570 2020-05-13 02:45:19 -0700 <stonecoldpat0> @nicksdjohnson but with the EIP-1559 mechanism. You could easily just say: If the base fee is above 20 gwei, then the network is congested. So then you can define some "reasonable fee" that should be paid. | 2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1260511049654177795 2020-05-13 03:03:48 -0700 <TokenBrice> Yes, @Tether_to and other stablecoins are awesome for the volume they generate on #Ethereum However, their adoption translates into a downgrade of the average user experience (higher gas costs / slower tx) Will EIP 1559 enough to resolve the dilemma? 👇 https://t.co/JILnPH1fHc | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1260519100092157952 2020-05-13 03:35:47 -0700 <poojaranjan19> I just won a Eth Guru Kudos by beating the 'Ethereum EIP 1559 Fee Market Quest' on @gitcoin quests. | 0 replies 1 retweets 7 likes | |
| 1260525566005919744 2020-05-13 04:01:29 -0700 <GatheringGwei> @evankaloudis @TrustlessState @ZeusLN Maybe your right in the context of bitcoin, but ultimately i believe Eth will be fast, cheap & reliable on L1 as it does not have to rely of fees for security. Ether also ticks all the boxes of hard money, and will likely be more scarce than btc due to EIP1559 fee burning & POS | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1260600461373177856 2020-05-13 08:59:05 -0700 <stonecoldpat0> @evan_van_ness does eip-1559 represent the block size wars | 2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1260602735260577792 2020-05-13 09:08:07 -0700 <davidiach> @econoar @nicksdjohnson The rush for EIP-1559: https://t.co/wrN913mQor | 0 replies 0 retweets 7 likes | |
| 1260637818885246981 2020-05-13 11:27:32 -0700 <iDecentralized> @cyounessi1 Under PoS and EIP-1559 economics, easily ETH. | 1 replies 1 retweets 7 likes | |
| 1260647055036301313 2020-05-13 12:04:14 -0700 <DoubleNSC> @QWQiao @iamDCinvestor @cyounessi1 Txn fees paid in ETH, not BTC, means higher ETH security (lower BTC sec) = lower issuance when adding value accrual mechs. (EIP-1559 fee burning) Overcollateralized with ETH (b/c ETH = more trustless settlement) >> liquid ETH as economic bandwidth >> lower float >> higher price | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1260647413900906496 2020-05-13 12:05:39 -0700 <GitcoinFeed> . • agoeng57@agoeng57 created Quest: Fixing the Ethereum Fee Market (EIP-1559) https://t.co/CNOC0hLRRC | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1260647663743074304 2020-05-13 12:06:39 -0700 <GitcoinFeed> . kangkolak@kangkolak created Quest: EIP 1559 Fee Market https://t.co/CEpMZTCarS | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1260648665065984000 2020-05-13 12:10:38 -0700 <GitcoinFeed> . robertho12@robertho12 created Quest: EIP 1559 Fee Market https://t.co/Yklx37Rs7r | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1260649265371557888 2020-05-13 12:13:01 -0700 <davidiach> @cyounessi1 2/ But assuming tokenized BTC gets traction, once staking and EIP-1559 is live on Ethereum, bitcoiners will likely burn hundreds of millions of dollars worth of ETH every year to use bitcoin on Ethereum. | 0 replies 0 retweets 8 likes | |
| 1260750871685668864 2020-05-13 18:56:46 -0700 <josephjpeters> @hasufl Bullish for ETH Will bring new DeFi users. More txs will lead to more ETH demand (fees paid in ETH). Increased usage will lead to lower net issuance once EIP1559 is implemented, making ETH more scarce. | 0 replies 1 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1260751111700402176 2020-05-13 18:57:43 -0700 <mrjasonchoi> @cyounessi1 BTC benefits more from massive increase in utility (leeching off entire DeFi ecosystem). Not sure about the “eip1559 tx fee burnt from BTC” narrative. If it happens, stablecoin transfers will probably have a bigger impact than BTC on ETH in the near term. https://t.co/h7JkaFcdsg | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1260790852827242498 2020-05-13 21:35:38 -0700 <GitcoinFeed> . • miscreant1@miscreant1 beat Quest: Fixing the Ethereum Fee Market (EIP-1559) https://t.co/lVJnrQykyz | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1260807205172858882 2020-05-13 22:40:37 -0700 <GitcoinFeed> . • miscreant1@miscreant1 played Quest: EIP 1559 Fee Market https://t.co/lVJnrQykyz | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1260807460475949056 2020-05-13 22:41:37 -0700 <GitcoinFeed> . • miscreant1@miscreant1 beat Quest: EIP 1559 Fee Market https://t.co/lVJnrQykyz | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1260860320823873541 2020-05-14 02:11:40 -0700 <lemiscate> Seems #Ethereum is a bit victim of his own success now. with USDT, #DeFi and now Reddit onboard, blocks are more than full and gasPrice is currently at 37gwei. why EIP-1559 not implemented yet? https://t.co/ReKzxvyHJJ | 3 replies 5 retweets 20 likes | |
| 1260868105296740357 2020-05-14 02:42:36 -0700 <GitcoinFeed> . • twintbeast@twintbeast played Quest: Fixing the Ethereum Fee Market (EIP-1559) https://t.co/NA7pBvqiGN | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1260869899217276929 2020-05-14 02:49:44 -0700 <GitcoinFeed> . • twintbeast@twintbeast played Quest: EIP 1559: The Final Puzzle-Piece to Ethereum’s Monetary Policy https://t.co/NA7pBvqiGN | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1260889945809522689 2020-05-14 04:09:23 -0700 <davidiach> @VillageIdiotDuh @antiprosynth Sure, but don't forget about EIP-1559. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1260910386850627584 2020-05-14 05:30:37 -0700 <GitcoinFeed> . • twintbeast@twintbeast played Quest: EIP 1559 Fee Market https://t.co/NA7pBvqiGN | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1260916310378188800 2020-05-14 05:54:09 -0700 <davidiach> @mysticryuujin @VillageIdiotDuh @antiprosynth If I remember correctly, ETH 2.0 comes with EIP-1559. Remains to be seen if we get it on ETH1.x as well. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1260916678566739969 2020-05-14 05:55:37 -0700 <mysticryuujin> @davidiach @VillageIdiotDuh @antiprosynth The title of the EIP is: EIP 1559: Fee market change for ETH 1.0 chain | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1260979771791552512 2020-05-14 10:06:20 -0700 <H3nr1c0V> @CryptoVanessa no ETH? EIP1559 comming ... | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1261014272303390726 2020-05-14 12:23:25 -0700 <FigoETH> The flaw in these arguments is that they confuse Gas with ETH. You use Gas (denominated in ETH) to have access to the Ethereum blockchain. ETH on the other side is earning interest (PoS), is locked in DeFi and burned with EIP 1559. | 0 replies 1 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1261018951678603267 2020-05-14 12:42:01 -0700 <FigoETH> @jlppfeffer Your argument reduces ETH just to be Gas (paying for transactions). But that is just not the case. ETH is locked in DeFi (reducing supply), will be earning Interest (3-5%) in PoS (starting 2020) and will be burned with EIP 1559 (likely 2020/2021). | 1 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1261072742775914497 2020-05-14 16:15:46 -0700 <lemiscate> @microsponsors with EIP-1559 at least we would have a few ETH burned in the process. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1261078246449348609 2020-05-14 16:37:38 -0700 <RyanSAdams> @jlppfeffer I think this argument ignores ETH’s use as a superior collateral within it’s network, other SoVs can’t compete with ETH’s trust guarantees on Ethereum It also ignores EIP1559, a mechanism that burns ETH with Ethereum transaction use https://t.co/SfG6WPVEv4 | 2 replies 0 retweets 7 likes | |
| 1261121507725475842 2020-05-14 19:29:32 -0700 <ashwinrz> Interesting take considering... 1. All DeFi protocols primarily use ETH as collateral, decreasing its velocity. Quanto perps/synths will further reinforce this trend 3. Total ETH locked will increase as the network migrates to PoS 3. EIP 1559 will decrease ETH inflation | 2 replies 3 retweets 24 likes | |
| 1261188812182446080 2020-05-14 23:56:59 -0700 <edmundedgar> @hitchcott @BobSummerwill I don't really understand why people keep trying to replace miner voting, EIP1559 does this as well. It's working great in practice, core-dev consensus is increasingly fractious, and protocol hard caps have caused a bad-tempered split of both the chains they've been tried on | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1261191564472311810 2020-05-15 00:07:55 -0700 <paulmillr> @zooko Nothing to worry about. Once eip1559 is accepted, all token transactions would require eth to pay for fees. Eth would get burned, which would decrease its supply, which would increase its price. | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1261259959758581760 2020-05-15 04:39:42 -0700 <GitcoinFeed> . Clément@clementpl played Quest: Fixing the Ethereum Fee Market (EIP-1559) https://t.co/vSQRY8Ua4x | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1261260185068134400 2020-05-15 04:40:35 -0700 <GitcoinFeed> . Clément@clementpl beat Quest: Fixing the Ethereum Fee Market (EIP-1559) https://t.co/vSQRY8Ua4x | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1261262747678867456 2020-05-15 04:50:46 -0700 <edmundedgar> @peter_szilagyi So if we do EIP1559 that doubles the peak (albeit it drops back to the average over time), is that currently dangerous for the same reason? | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1261263206246346752 2020-05-15 04:52:36 -0700 <GitcoinFeed> . Adrian Nistor@levelboy beat Quest: Fixing the Ethereum Fee Market (EIP-1559) https://t.co/Z2mNs2Hgjw | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1261278247637188608 2020-05-15 05:52:22 -0700 <LUKACACIC> @CharlieShrem @VitalikButerin EIP 1559 is coming with PoS | 2 replies 0 retweets 13 likes | |
| 1261278365010530304 2020-05-15 05:52:50 -0700 <iamDCinvestor> @ElastosTroll @CharlieShrem @VitalikButerin Issuance is likely necessary to guarantee security for any chain...including Bitcoin. However, under PoS, and possibly sooner under PoW with EIP-1559, we may have fee burn. This could allow for net supply destruction through regular chain use, or at least reduce net issuance. | 2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1261322597037293569 2020-05-15 08:48:36 -0700 <GitcoinFeed> . • yuandri@yuandri played Quest: Fixing the Ethereum Fee Market (EIP-1559) https://t.co/0c7MW5IJv6 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1261322881109078021 2020-05-15 08:49:43 -0700 <GitcoinFeed> . • cagncrm@cagncrm played Quest: Fixing the Ethereum Fee Market (EIP-1559) https://t.co/5OfBprGbe6 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1261339747324096514 2020-05-15 09:56:44 -0700 <Tetranode> Just add EIP-1559 and watch the Ether bonfire. | 0 replies 4 retweets 20 likes | |
| 1261342733689487360 2020-05-15 10:08:36 -0700 <GitcoinFeed> . • MUHAMMAD ADIL RAZA@madilraza played Quest: Fixing the Ethereum Fee Market (EIP-1559) https://t.co/2Ol4sXcLzX | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1261344520626597888 2020-05-15 10:15:43 -0700 <GitcoinFeed> . Vasilios Mavroudis@mavroudisv played Quest: Ethereum EIP 1559 Fee Market https://t.co/LqAgumMqEh | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1261360331432931328 2020-05-15 11:18:32 -0700 <CHalexov2016> @LUKACACIC @CharlieShrem @VitalikButerin Yeah eip 1559 | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1261363149451608064 2020-05-15 11:29:44 -0700 <zooko> @matthew_d_green Good point, Matt, but you can combine this with an EIP-1559 / https://t.co/e8Pq97ALAS type mechanism which *does* hide fees from colluding miners. (Also maybe hiding fees from everyone *other* than colluding miners might be worth doing. Maybe.) | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1261383733619220482 2020-05-15 12:51:32 -0700 <harrycanuck> @alexgausman @DegenSpartan Yeah I also think there’s some nuance in paying out a subgroup of holders a la SNX model that way buybacks only affect few vs all holders Maybe he’s biased 😉 I was thinking about how eth2 staking vs eip1559 creates a similar dynamic Why not have both? 😁 | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1261450450072563713 2020-05-15 17:16:38 -0700 <GatheringGwei> @CharlieShrem @VitalikButerin After POS & EIP1559, Eth will be more scarce than btc, with the possibility of negative issuance if the network is used at scale. And the best part is it can scale onchain 🌈 without having to rely on high fees for security. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1261479802684522496 2020-05-15 19:13:16 -0700 <AttestantIO> Not ideal ~ roll on EIP-1559, #ASAP! (#ETH2.0) | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1261482671986769921 2020-05-15 19:24:40 -0700 <fezbox> @RyanSAdams Gotta get the gas fee situation under control! Fast track eip1559 | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1261504714467753985 2020-05-15 20:52:16 -0700 <TrustlessState> @JBmastercrypto @YungGucciT @argentHQ Also, EIP 1559 fixes this at the protocol level too. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1261506547592593408 2020-05-15 20:59:33 -0700 <JBmastercrypto> @TrustlessState @YungGucciT @argentHQ This is true, but when is EIP 1559 going to be fully implemented? Is it going to take the same amount of time as ETH 2.0? | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1261519640129187840 2020-05-15 21:51:34 -0700 <GitcoinFeed> . Satya Naveen Vysetty@vsatyanaveen played Quest: EIP 1559 Fee Market https://t.co/y9axxvPZnz | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1261519892433399808 2020-05-15 21:52:34 -0700 <GitcoinFeed> . Satya Naveen Vysetty@vsatyanaveen beat Quest: EIP 1559 Fee Market https://t.co/y9axxvPZnz | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1261519893238738945 2020-05-15 21:52:35 -0700 <GitcoinFeed> . Satya Naveen Vysetty@vsatyanaveen played Quest: Fixing the Ethereum Fee Market (EIP-1559) https://t.co/y9axxvPZnz | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1261520144930496519 2020-05-15 21:53:35 -0700 <GitcoinFeed> . Satya Naveen Vysetty@vsatyanaveen beat Quest: Fixing the Ethereum Fee Market (EIP-1559) https://t.co/y9axxvPZnz | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1261531468062355458 2020-05-15 22:38:34 -0700 <Gargant34260060> @TimBeiko @JHancock Maybe eip 1559 and 2515 can go in the same update together | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1261551483742453760 2020-05-15 23:58:06 -0700 <TimHallCH> EIP-1559 on ETH 1.x before ETH 2 Phase 0 would be great <3 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1261607465562456065 2020-05-16 03:40:33 -0700 <GitcoinFeed> . • jboner28@jboner28 played Quest: EIP 1559 Fee Market https://t.co/KwDcCmxYfe | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1261654507831930881 2020-05-16 06:47:29 -0700 <PaulRBerg> I'm late to the EIP-1559 party, but this a neat proposal by @econoar, @VitalikButerin et al. It changes the first price auction model to a floating mechanism w/ a base fee and optional tips. This base fee is burned, putting deflationary pressure on ETH🔥 https://t.co/mSazaUHaqf | 4 replies 3 retweets 34 likes | |
| 1261697408729337858 2020-05-16 09:37:58 -0700 <BurnSignal> @owocki @PaulRBerg @econoar @VitalikButerin @gitcoin You can signal support for EIP 1559 on this @BurnSignal. "Should Ethereum implement a fee market change for ETH 1.0 (EIP-1559)?" https://t.co/p84wOZtTPw | 0 replies 2 retweets 8 likes | |
| 1261701843735863297 2020-05-16 09:55:35 -0700 <GitcoinFeed> . • cagncrm@cagncrm played Quest: Fixing the Ethereum Fee Market (EIP-1559) https://t.co/5OfBprGbe6 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1261712161954361344 2020-05-16 10:36:35 -0700 <GitcoinFeed> . • twintbeast@twintbeast played Quest: EIP 1559 Fee Market https://t.co/NA7pBvqiGN | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1261749283570630656 2020-05-16 13:04:06 -0700 <DeFi_Dad> @PaulRBerg @econoar @VitalikButerin We need EIP1559. What’s stalling this from being implemented? | 0 replies 0 retweets 7 likes | |
| 1261771798581874688 2020-05-16 14:33:34 -0700 <GitcoinFeed> . • Ryan Gordon@ryan-gordon played Quest: EIP 1559 Fee Market https://t.co/lQE86fevtW | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1261838239771443202 2020-05-16 18:57:34 -0700 <GitcoinFeed> . cuchu23@cuchu23 played Quest: Fixing the Ethereum Fee Market (EIP-1559) https://t.co/AdYbTbxDTV | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1261866923454681089 2020-05-16 20:51:33 -0700 <GitcoinFeed> . • NASI₿ @bild96 played Quest: EIP 1559 Fee Market https://t.co/KSGex57P0o | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1261867176333434880 2020-05-16 20:52:33 -0700 <GitcoinFeed> . • NASI₿ @bild96 beat Quest: EIP 1559 Fee Market https://t.co/KSGex57P0o | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1261931101439684608 2020-05-17 01:06:34 -0700 <GitcoinFeed> . Deepthi Naidu@deepthinaidu played Quest: Ethereum EIP 1559 Fee Market https://t.co/DGcdeEExMn | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1262031756066078721 2020-05-17 07:46:32 -0700 <GitcoinFeed> . • NASI₿ @bild96 played Quest: Fixing the Ethereum Fee Market (EIP-1559) https://t.co/KSGex57P0o | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1262034779941167105 2020-05-17 07:58:33 -0700 <GitcoinFeed> . • hanna Timur@hanaa8 $3.03 | +$5.04 beat Quest: Ethereum EIP 1559 Fee Market https://t.co/ng62zw63z6 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1262046102292840448 2020-05-17 08:43:33 -0700 <GitcoinFeed> . • twintbeast@twintbeast played Quest: EIP 1559 Fee Market https://t.co/NA7pBvqiGN | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1262049875933290496 2020-05-17 08:58:32 -0700 <GitcoinFeed> . • twintbeast@twintbeast beat Quest: EIP 1559 Fee Market https://t.co/NA7pBvqiGN | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1262077932870098945 2020-05-17 10:50:02 -0700 <ChainLinkGod> @nullpackets @SergeyEinstein @amadeobrands @S1mbbba @chainlink @WeAreTellor Also looks they don't know about EIP-1559 🤭 | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1262149273187168257 2020-05-17 15:33:30 -0700 <AlexMasmej> @JimmyRagosa I don’t believe it actually matters and the network can be secured with a lower price for sure, especially in the future However, we should have EIP-1559 and other means of making the supply scarce enough to have the price at least naturally correlate with Ethereum’s growth. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1262368219257397248 2020-05-18 06:03:31 -0700 <GitcoinFeed> . • miscreant1@miscreant1 played Quest: EIP 1559 Fee Market https://t.co/lVJnrQykyz | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1262383831287582728 2020-05-18 07:05:33 -0700 <GitcoinFeed> . • miscreant1@miscreant1 played Quest: Ethereum EIP 1559 Fee Market https://t.co/lVJnrQPVX9 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1262389363700379648 2020-05-18 07:27:33 -0700 <GitcoinFeed> . • miscreant1@miscreant1 played Quest: EIP 1559 Fee Market https://t.co/lVJnrQPVX9 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1262418122105073665 2020-05-18 09:21:49 -0700 <Chloethedev> @decentralized89 @tokenstate @iamDCinvestor I would say because cutting your security in half on a set schedule doesn't take into account external factors that are affecting the security of the network while ETH 2.0 with EIP 1559 would allow for issuance to be at whatever level was needed. Hopefully eventually leading -ve. | 1 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1262422101769756674 2020-05-18 09:37:38 -0700 <tokenstate> @decentralized89 @iamDCinvestor Future demand is unknown. The key is to allow utility to expand security. In ETH's case it's the move to POS (staking) & fee burning EIP-1559. POS is necessary b/c of security & efficiency. Requires lower inflation hopefully to a point of net negative issuance. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1262440325848502272 2020-05-18 10:50:03 -0700 <owocki> Current Ethereum Network Gas Price (Y Axis) vs Confirmation Time (x axis) ⛽️ In a sane world this would be a diagonal line from top left to bottom right, but it's not. 📈✨ I'm pretty tired of fielding support requests about this. Long EIP 1559! https://t.co/dXVLWhguuy | 1 replies 6 retweets 41 likes | |
| 1262478514550439949 2020-05-18 13:21:48 -0700 <OnurHSolmaz> Many projects are adopting EIP-1559 like gas price adjustment (e.g. Near), and we need to find another way of addressing this mechanism. Sth like "price floor adjustment" or "price auto-adjustment" | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1262499273020780555 2020-05-18 14:44:17 -0700 <statelayer> Implement EIP1559 now ! #EIP1559 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1262685980261339137 2020-05-19 03:06:11 -0700 <ChainNewscom> 【ETH 未来发行量将如何变化？从 Eth2、EIP-1559、挖矿等角度分析】未来几年，Eth2、EIP-1559、挖矿等因素如何影响 ETH 的发行量？ https://t.co/x6ZAJWbHrc | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1262695127455272967 2020-05-19 03:42:32 -0700 <KryptoAlpha_> In the case of Ethereum: - EIP1559 coming which will actually decrease supply as demand increases - Proof of Stake simulating hoarding These may make it one of the best investment of the new decade. (2/2) | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1262721794710134785 2020-05-19 05:28:30 -0700 <RyanSAdams> High gas is good for Ethereum In the short-term it's painful, but in the medium-term it pushes progress on rollups, gas derivatives, & EIP1559 Our city has too much traffic let's build a monorail Is a better problem than... Our city is a ghost town no one wants to live here | 6 replies 11 retweets 71 likes | |
| 1262736537818509312 2020-05-19 06:27:05 -0700 <amadeobrands> @RyanSAdams EIP 1559 looks as if it might move forward ... https://t.co/761s1PQIqb So far the hard issue is how to model the burn rate etc. What do you think will EIP1559 pass? | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1262821956061020160 2020-05-19 12:06:31 -0700 <GitcoinFeed> . Roshan Karunarathna@madu-rosh played Quest: Fixing the Ethereum Fee Market (EIP-1559) https://t.co/pwb7hfwXxv | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1262854271717998594 2020-05-19 14:14:55 -0700 <tomuky> #Ethereum Improvement Proposal (EIP) 1559 is going to be good. https://t.co/S2zzyLwXRf | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1262916390626918403 2020-05-19 18:21:46 -0700 <Teammoon7> @xsanchezpr @x1shaun22 @jonnylitecoin @LTCFoundation @atari Look at EIP 1559 on eth 2.0 | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1262973952109932545 2020-05-19 22:10:29 -0700 <GitcoinFeed> . Roshan Karunarathna@madu-rosh played Quest: EIP 1559 Fee Market https://t.co/pwb7hfwXxv | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1262995824356843520 2020-05-19 23:37:24 -0700 <samstargazer> downloaded an extension that tracks eth gas price and its super convenient. beats having to check ethgastation every time before executing a transaction. with Eth 2.0 being rolled out in Q3 or Q4, hope EIP 1559 gets implemented soon, can't do much when prices are over 20 gwei | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1263069234780831744 2020-05-20 04:29:06 -0700 <Chloethedev> What if EIP 1559 wasn't about burning valuable $ETH... but about finding valuable funds that are necessary for grant funding for E👀? I'm all for the get rich, economic growth of my tokens kinda thing... But is my immediate personal wealth > security of the chain my wealth is on? | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1263098816137494529 2020-05-20 06:26:39 -0700 <TimBeiko> The second @ethereum EIP-1559 call has been scheduled for next week 🥳 Agenda: https://t.co/bFn6uxtlYb https://t.co/aLQckwCwxw | 0 replies 6 retweets 32 likes | |
| 1263121940719362051 2020-05-20 07:58:32 -0700 <GatheringGwei> @Fiskantes @kaiynne EIP1559 plans to fix this UX issue on eth | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1263173017326112768 2020-05-20 11:21:30 -0700 <GitcoinFeed> . • NASI₿ @bild96 played Quest: EIP 1559 Fee Market https://t.co/KSGex57P0o | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1263191889055891456 2020-05-20 12:36:29 -0700 <GitcoinFeed> . • NASI₿ @bild96 beat Quest: EIP 1559 Fee Market https://t.co/KSGex57P0o | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1263216142396596224 2020-05-20 14:12:52 -0700 <DaoChemist> @mhluongo @VitalikButerin $ETH is at the heart of #DeFi and with EIP-1559 has a very clear value capture. If gov is so crucial for you, why not pick another base layer, like Tezos or Polkadot? There's a ton of base layers to pick from, why build on top of a base you don't like? | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1263216560107290628 2020-05-20 14:14:32 -0700 <mhluongo> @DaoChemist @VitalikButerin EIP 1559 is a big improvement. And no, I like "voice or exit" governance- the others are interesting but not where I want to store my personal wealth. | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1263271644119867394 2020-05-20 17:53:25 -0700 <johnsaipan> @CurrencyTycoon @noshitcoins What happen to your EIP1559...when???? | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1263284258744885250 2020-05-20 18:43:32 -0700 <ncchan93> @hasufl @VitalikButerin @mhluongo Don't u think the lack of opposition is related to promises of lower issuance after the transition to eth 2.0 and eip 1559? | 2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1263301810397167617 2020-05-20 19:53:17 -0700 <ChainLinkGod> @hasufl @VitalikButerin @mhluongo It's very minimal increase especially considering when PoW drops off lowering issuance, combined with EIP-1559 fee burning, net issuance could be <0 https://t.co/UwPJ0bhv6N | 2 replies 1 retweets 6 likes | |
| 1263304036507439106 2020-05-20 20:02:08 -0700 <auryn_macmillan> What would the gas prices look like right now if EIP 1559 was already deployed? | 3 replies 2 retweets 11 likes | |
| 1263339018931941377 2020-05-20 22:21:08 -0700 <ChainLinkGod> @ncchan93 @hasufl @VitalikButerin @mhluongo 10 years for phase1? Nah, a couple years at most imo, it can even be done sooner if need be with tradeoffs, but the small increase until the PoW->PoS switch is minimal and absorbed by eip-1559 https://t.co/uyiVOqik5q | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1263382668500058112 2020-05-21 01:14:35 -0700 <GatheringGwei> @Arthur_0x Yea i would agree that is the best way. I don’t see enough people willing to pay high fees to transact on btc when there are so many alternatives. Big fan of Eth’s perpetual issuance to pay for security w/ EIP1559 fee burning countering the increase in supply | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1263458588699299842 2020-05-21 06:16:16 -0700 <auryn_macmillan> Woke up wanting to finalize some @joincolony tasks, checked @ETHGasStation... oof When #EIP1559? https://t.co/93A7ec0MgO https://t.co/tYnTLJu7lK | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1263460758559559682 2020-05-21 06:24:53 -0700 <hasufl> Does EIP-1559 assume a perpetual block subsidy? It sure seems so, but isn't made clear in the proposal itself | 5 replies 2 retweets 13 likes | |
| 1263461615829164032 2020-05-21 06:28:17 -0700 <TimBeiko> @hasufl Are you talking about Eth2? EIP-1559 isn't really written with that in mind. IIRC Eth2 is supposed to have a similar mechanism, but I don't think it will be the exact same thing. | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1263470988546760706 2020-05-21 07:05:32 -0700 <CarlGocht> @hasufl Whats your opinion on eip-1559? I have had doubts that it is actually efficient or changes anything given that fees really just get renamed to 'tips' with an extra little base fee | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1263472001500545025 2020-05-21 07:09:33 -0700 <BenDMahala> @hasufl Since they plan to have perpetual issuance anyway, just burning the fee seems easiest. What I find interesting is that a coalition of miners could easily do something like EIP-1559 as a softfork in BTC and probably make everyone better off. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1263488594162966528 2020-05-21 08:15:29 -0700 <gakonst> in EIP1559 how is BASEFEE set? the EIP specifies that it's a consensus parameter but doesn't specify how that parameter would get chosen | 1 replies 1 retweets 6 likes | |
| 1263493227270688769 2020-05-21 08:33:54 -0700 <econoar> EIP-1559 Implementers Call #2 is schedule for 5/28 at 14:00 UTC. https://t.co/vvMfD3N66n https://t.co/lFv4GV0Jzd | 1 replies 6 retweets 23 likes | |
| 1263515221223710722 2020-05-21 10:01:18 -0700 <scott_lew_is> @TrustlessState yea, i think its a balance. fee market is just way to volatile to encourage L2. if fees go up 10x more after they are up 10x already, it breaks most L2 schemes too. something like EIP-1559 with a reasonable and stable fee is a better option to achieve this goal. | 0 replies 0 retweets 8 likes | |
| 1263522035000643584 2020-05-21 10:28:22 -0700 <JochemBrouwer96> This is exciting! Hopefully after the Berlin #Ethereum upgrade the next upgrade includes EIP 1559 =) https://t.co/Hf27lR6CaW | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1263577321690324997 2020-05-21 14:08:04 -0700 <auryn_macmillan> @DeFiDude You should vote in this Burn Signal. Should Ethereum implement a fee market change for ETH 1.0 (EIP-1559)? https://t.co/dUVUNuT0IX | 0 replies 1 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1263582659751505921 2020-05-21 14:29:16 -0700 <TimBeiko> @hasufl This is basically the counter EIP-1559 proposal: https://t.co/pAOTlUdnUF | 2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1263627834972672001 2020-05-21 17:28:47 -0700 <JBmastercrypto> Thanks to @TrustlessState and @econoar for their articles on EIP 1559. I finally understood it 100%. It will definitely help Ethereum a bit with the expensive gas problem on ETH 1.0 and it will also help Ethereum's monetary policy as a whole. https://t.co/nZ2ONuqLJD | 2 replies 9 retweets 36 likes | |
| 1263629004193423360 2020-05-21 17:33:26 -0700 <TrustlessState> @JBmastercrypto @econoar Glad it helped! There will be lots to learn (and corrections to be made) when we see EIP1559 out in the wild. | 1 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1263687169484288000 2020-05-21 21:24:34 -0700 <GitcoinFeed> . Satya Naveen Vysetty@vsatyanaveen played Quest: EIP 1559 Fee Market https://t.co/y9axxvPZnz | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1263691781239181312 2020-05-21 21:42:53 -0700 <d3laabs> @econoar EIP 1559 - Network fee based on network demand. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1263708785920466947 2020-05-21 22:50:27 -0700 <GitcoinFeed> . Satya Naveen Vysetty@vsatyanaveen beat Quest: EIP 1559 Fee Market https://t.co/y9axxvPZnz | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1263770931274477568 2020-05-22 02:57:24 -0700 <precyz> Re: EIP 1559 Base gas fees get burned 🔥 ➡️ ETH captures value 📈 | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1263775696528084993 2020-05-22 03:16:20 -0700 <0xTycoon> @antiprosynth Haha! Well, I offered to submit a PR for the bug, but it looks like one of the speedy core devs already beat me to it. Maybe next time! Anyhow, at present I'm an "EIP-1559 Maximalist" on my profile 😎 | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1263812229280882688 2020-05-22 05:41:30 -0700 <GitcoinFeed> . • nextkuro @nextkuro beat Quest: EIP 1559 Fee Market https://t.co/EnnPL3Q70v | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1263839478554206216 2020-05-22 07:29:47 -0700 <auryn_macmillan> @scott_lew_is You should vote in this @BurnSignal. "Should Ethereum implement a fee market change for ETH 1.0 (EIP-1559)?" https://t.co/dUVUNuT0IX | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1263870482228686852 2020-05-22 09:32:59 -0700 <FigoETH> Facts undervalued regarding ETH - along with BTC the only crypto asset approved as commodity by CFTC (regulatory clarity) - clear monetary policy with lower issuance than BTC around 2025 (0.5 - 1 %) - likely deflationary character (DeFi lockup, EIP 1559) | 0 replies 6 retweets 18 likes | |
| 1263880169325879296 2020-05-22 10:11:28 -0700 <GitcoinFeed> . • 7ada@7ada $1.74 | +$3.45 played Quest: Fixing the Ethereum Fee Market (EIP-1559) https://t.co/mTi9vniA7p | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1264168226285432832 2020-05-23 05:16:06 -0700 <shingen_crypto> @tatsuzou12 @GOXGOXGOX2 @cryptophile_btc 合成資産の話は直接的なETHの用途の一例ですね。ICOトークンで信用想像はどんどん無くなっていきます 後はTxの手数料についてはEIP1559が鍵になりますが、これはPoS化した2.0以降でないと厳しいでしょう。これが動くと報酬と手数料バーンが相殺してインフレ率が低下します https://t.co/6XWYbHnKNK | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1264206412995010561 2020-05-23 07:47:51 -0700 <cryptobuddy19> @CHalexov2016 @ethereum @Consensys @baselineproto @prylabs But? EIP1559? | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1264296621547888642 2020-05-23 13:46:18 -0700 <MapleLeafCap> It seems to me EIP1559 turns ETH from water to oil, with a nascent petrochemical infrastructure (defi) to power the 1st tangible real-life use-case of low-cost, permissionless, point-to-point, noncustodial USD transfer. | 1 replies 4 retweets 18 likes | |
| 1264361243890069507 2020-05-23 18:03:05 -0700 <ChainNewscom> 【以太坊创始人 Vitalik：EIP1559 提案可短期缓解 gas 费价格问题，真正解决方案须提高以太坊的可扩展性】链闻消息，庞氏骗局目前已成为以太坊交易费用最大支出之一，这导致 gas 费用在近期大幅上涨，给合法项目带…… https://t.co/aYlnPdJuNI | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1264402011715522567 2020-05-23 20:45:05 -0700 <AttestantIO> EIP-1559 fixes this ... | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1264556159601643520 2020-05-24 06:57:37 -0700 <CHalexov2016> @sassal0x We need gas burn eip-1559 to go live asap 🤝 | 1 replies 1 retweets 8 likes | |
| 1264594417555394560 2020-05-24 09:29:38 -0700 <GitcoinFeed> . • hamza@hamzaghz beat Quest: Fixing the Ethereum Fee Market (EIP-1559) https://t.co/B25t8Z0T28 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1264730223456763909 2020-05-24 18:29:17 -0700 <JBmastercrypto> @VitalikButerin when EIP 1559? #ethereum https://t.co/cbz2P0mfnE | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1264770159652204544 2020-05-24 21:07:59 -0700 <shingen_crypto> @Yamaoka_btc なるほど。確かにまあ現状の手数料はなんとかしたいところありますが、難しいですよね PoS移行後でしょうがEIP1559に期待してます。先は長いですがｗ | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1264825949146812418 2020-05-25 00:49:40 -0700 <svantetobias> #Ethereum does not have halvings like $BTC, but Minimal Necessary Issuance. We stop inflating as soon as it is safe to do so! 1. Ethereum 2 phase 0 2. EIP-1559 3. The end of mining 4. Ethereum 2 phase 2 Read more: https://t.co/kLoY9qk3SS https://t.co/ia3YEazcAY | 1 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1264930430303653889 2020-05-25 07:44:50 -0700 <GatheringGwei> @AriDavidPaul ETH benefits from this as 1. ETH is required for network fees 2. More network activity = more ETH burnt (EIP1559) 3. ETH is held by users who receive payments due to it’s scarcity + Dividends received by staking & since many may hold ETH, it can still be a common form of payment | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1264941581825605632 2020-05-25 08:29:09 -0700 <Marcolevarato> @RyanSAdams @antiprosynth The ETH(Gas) paid for the fees go back to the miners that sells that amount, so its balanced. The price to go organically up needs an imbalance. Burning the fees with the eip 1559, wil create this imbalance. The price can still go up other reasons e.g. demand for borrowing DAI | 0 replies 1 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1264959919041716224 2020-05-25 09:42:01 -0700 <LiamJanssens> @TheCryptoDog when there is an actual date for eth 2.0 phase 0 and for eip 1559 for burning the the tx fees instead of paying them to miners. It will have actual value capture then, can't wait for when that time comes will prob be the catalyst for a crazy run. I miss 2017 | 0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1265130316491964417 2020-05-25 20:59:07 -0700 <0xTycoon> @AriDavidPaul $ETH will always be the king once EIP-1559 is in. This is because it will always be required as payment for gas. | 0 replies 1 retweets 10 likes | |
| 1265139260245434370 2020-05-25 21:34:39 -0700 <0xTycoon> @TheCryptoDog ETH 2.0 launch & EIP-1559 will have people (and dogs) salivating I'm sure 😋 | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1265200664881192962 2020-05-26 01:38:39 -0700 <johnsaipan> @CurrencyTycoon @TheCryptoDog EIP_1559 When? | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1265262991810850849 2020-05-26 05:46:19 -0700 <owocki> just another day running a dApp on the Ethereum network, pre EIP-1559 ... https://t.co/qmwBvWcA7D | 4 replies 4 retweets 31 likes | |
| 1265319337444900866 2020-05-26 09:30:13 -0700 <dankrad> @OffchainLabs @EdFelten Unfortunately MEV is a terrible way to pay miners. Because 1. like transaction fees going to miners, it adds little security but makes chains less stable (see EIP1559 motication); 2. What's even worse than centralizing MEV extraction is centralizing miners. And that's what 1/2 | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1265375378220163073 2020-05-26 13:12:54 -0700 <NapoleonBlum> @DoveyWan So yes and no i would say...I understand your point. But isn't Stablecoin ERC20 ? By indirect valuation shouldn't the ERC20 capitalization always equal or inferior to the capitalization of Ethereum ? + Could EIP 1559 resolve a part of the issues ? | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1265405555666903040 2020-05-26 15:12:49 -0700 <willmorriss4> @owocki @JHancock EIP-1559 would not lower fees, and you would be waiting just as long. If your dapp's transactions don't earn back their fees you will be squeezed out of the main shard. | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1265420169880440833 2020-05-26 16:10:53 -0700 <ShadySlimFast> @QWQiao ETH 2.0 or eip 1559? | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1265434907796332544 2020-05-26 17:09:27 -0700 <AlexSaundersAU> I charted Ethereum's current stock to flow (white) vs where it will sit in the next 1-2 years (black). Inflation will decrease with proof of stake & burning of fees (EIP1559). ETH's monetary policy is evolving. $ETH is becoming better money. 🥇🌐🖥️ Data: https://t.co/3U6tu58ceB https://t.co/0K7PuRJ0nk | 24 replies 45 retweets 207 likes | |
| 1265479519093153792 2020-05-26 20:06:43 -0700 <0x_dvd> @jdorman81 @arca @RyanSAdams @BanklessHQ Main points: collateral for the thriving ecosystem soon about to take off with layer 2 scaling (trillions in derivatives trading will happen on #Ethereum and use permissionpess collateral $ETH), staking coming soon, net negative issuance likely with EIP-1559. What’s not to like? | 0 replies 0 retweets 6 likes | |
| 1265505665658871808 2020-05-26 21:50:37 -0700 <warcapllc> @cryptobuzznews Need Eip-1559 | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1265519122563174400 2020-05-26 22:44:05 -0700 <fubuloubu> Is EIP-1559 "too big to fail" at this point? (A) What are you talking about? This is silly! 🤫 (B) Well, now that you mention it... It may just be 🤔 (C) It's an integral part of the $ETH value accrual narrative! 📈🚀🔥💸🤑 | 0 replies 1 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1265522914092290049 2020-05-26 22:59:09 -0700 <fubuloubu> @Foobazzler Evil Twist! I love it lol But srsly, every time I see a Tweet about why $ETH will accrue value, it always mentions EIP-1559 as one of the key points I'm gonna start blocking "It's happening soon!" from my timeline | 0 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1265593419214151680 2020-05-27 03:39:19 -0700 <shingen_crypto> 国内のイーサリアンは知ってて煽らないけど、実はEIP1559とETH2.0で供給減と手数料Burnの合せ技があるからこういう話になるのは以前から周知の事実。 海外は結構煽るんだよね 笑 価格上昇はセキュリティ上昇や投資促進に繋がる面もあるから大事というのも解るけど、バブルは嫌という気持ちもある | 1 replies 0 retweets 26 likes | |
| 1265603010874322944 2020-05-27 04:17:26 -0700 <CCassets> ぶっちゃけ今Eth1.0にEIP1559入れたら、 手数料上に張り付くかもしれないし、 ブロックGasLimit20Mgasで、Uncle率とか見ながら安全性を確かめる必要がある。 20Mgasで安定していけるなら、またいろいろ話が変わってくる。 | 1 replies 1 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1265823656380416002 2020-05-27 18:54:12 -0700 <hasufl> @pyskell @nicksdjohnson @SavantSpecter @paddypisa no, we're talking about EIP1559 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1265893656776503296 2020-05-27 23:32:21 -0700 <GitcoinFeed> . Deepthi Naidu@deepthinaidu played Quest: Ethereum EIP 1559 Fee Market https://t.co/DGcdeEExMn | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1265934124050776065 2020-05-28 02:13:09 -0700 <realLedgerwatch> @nicksdjohnson @JHancock @hasufl @SavantSpecter @paddypisa I think analogies do not really help here @JHancock 🚦:) The difference between what we have now and EIP-1559 is that as congestion goes on, under EIP-1559, the full blocks will cause BASEFEE to rise, and most txs will be removed from the tx pool when their FEECAP < BASEFEE | 2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1265937488578838531 2020-05-28 02:26:31 -0700 <stonecoldpat0> @realLedgerwatch @nicksdjohnson @JHancock @hasufl @SavantSpecter Ya. So with any.sender is that we will have max gas price queues (bump up to 80 gwei) and republish it every few blocks. Our strategy for EIP1559 doesn't change. So it would just eventually get back in. | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1265937750139768832 2020-05-28 02:27:34 -0700 <stonecoldpat0> @realLedgerwatch @nicksdjohnson @JHancock @hasufl @SavantSpecter What worries me about EIP1559 is that there is a conception that it will help with the congestion we have now (50gwei), but actually it potentially makes it worse. | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1265989911225798662 2020-05-28 05:54:50 -0700 <TimBeiko> .@ethereum EIP-1559 Implementers' call #2 starting in ~1h 🎉 I'll share some high-level takeaways here after the call and we'll have a full transcript available a few days after. Agenda: https://t.co/bFn6uxtlYb | 5 replies 29 retweets 96 likes | |
| 1266019736690843649 2020-05-28 07:53:21 -0700 <RyanWatkins_> Furthermore, the decreased inflation rate is critical in solidifying ETH’s perception as a scarce asset - an issue that has drawn criticism from the Bitcoin community. In fact, with EIP 1559 and PoS, higher fees could lead to ETH's net issuance potentially going negative. | 1 replies 1 retweets 28 likes | |
| 1266027463802531840 2020-05-28 08:24:03 -0700 <TimBeiko> .@barnabemonnot shared some updates on his simulation work combining EIP-1559 and the Escalator Fee proposal: https://t.co/uA4igCSOVw Open questions include what default values should be for users and whether we can look at historical txns to get informative data for these EIPs | 1 replies 1 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1266028261425008641 2020-05-28 08:27:13 -0700 <TimBeiko> We then spent a lot of time discussing @MicahZoltu's PR to the EIP: https://t.co/y8Y0IXHUzB TL;DR: it proposes to *not* move to fix block sizes as part of EIP-1559 and still leave the block size to be decided by miners. | 1 replies 1 retweets 6 likes | |
| 1266028971512213505 2020-05-28 08:30:03 -0700 <TimBeiko> To make sure we keep things clear and preserve the option to make block sizes fixed if needed, Ian from @vulcanizeio will open a new EIP that only proposes this change, and add it as a potential requirement for EIP-1559. We'll then merge Micah's PR and use variable block sizes 👍🏻 | 2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes | |
| 1266029370910662656 2020-05-28 08:31:38 -0700 <TimBeiko> Then, @danfinlay from @metamask_io gave a great design update on how EIP-1559 and the escalator fees alternative would look for users. He'll be sharing a Figma link shortly, and we'll try and gather more wallet feedback on @EthMagicians, but here's a sneak peak 👀 https://t.co/n2cSl4FwZY | 1 replies 13 retweets 61 likes | |
| 1266071838976815104 2020-05-28 11:20:23 -0700 <josephjpeters> @kevinsekniqi @leartulaj So you assume that EIP-1559 won’t happen? | 0 replies 1 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1266072898122416128 2020-05-28 11:24:36 -0700 <DeFiStandard> Será interesante seguir de cerca la ratio marketcap total/comisiones generadas -lo que viene ser un "proxy" de un p/e en el mundo de las finanzas tradicionales 🏦. Cuanto más valor 💰 aloje Ethereum, más comisiones se generan = +dividendos o reducción del supply (EIP1559) | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1266078824875376640 2020-05-28 11:48:09 -0700 <CHalexov2016> @TimBeiko @sina17999516 @iamDCinvestor @ethereum So @TimBeiko this eip 1559 can be add in eth2 before its go live? I or its go live with eth2 phase 0 or phase 1 ? Sorry i am not a tech guy 😇 | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1266084448606486533 2020-05-28 12:10:29 -0700 <bitcoinertoday> [- Youtuber (EN) Ethereum Foundation -] EIP-1559 Implementers’ Call #2 @ethereum https://t.co/a53AGxKtpt | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1266086552662392833 2020-05-28 12:18:51 -0700 <on_ethereum> EIP-1559 Implementers’ Call #2 via @on_ethereum | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1266121595862433792 2020-05-28 14:38:06 -0700 <willmorriss4> @k06a The two primary arguments against increasing the limit are sync time and state size, but miners are also incentivized to constrain block size to keep gasPrice high. Similarly, under EIP-1559 they would be incentivized to constrain block size to keep base fee low. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1266169180983824384 2020-05-28 17:47:11 -0700 <ShadySlimFast> @loomdart eip1559 too will finally tie economic throughput into token value to some degree. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1266189364272476165 2020-05-28 19:07:23 -0700 <antiprosynth> @kevinsekniqi EIP 1559 is coming, dear "friend of Ethereum". | 1 replies 5 retweets 45 likes | |
| 1266197567152492546 2020-05-28 19:39:59 -0700 <mathew_corm> Great progress on EIP-1559 👀 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1266215820851589122 2020-05-28 20:52:31 -0700 <AlexMasmej> I love EIP-1559 Transactions might not be known in advance, but they should be cheaper | 0 replies 1 retweets 6 likes | |
| 1266217962807017473 2020-05-28 21:01:02 -0700 <DeFi_Dad> @TimBeiko doing the work of the Lord with EIP-1559 Implementer calls! Thank you for the super detailed notes. #Ethereum https://t.co/LYhilZkVBh | 0 replies 0 retweets 8 likes | |
| 1266219759835676674 2020-05-28 21:08:10 -0700 <CHalexov2016> Yeah @hudsonjameson lets show the world Core Devs are ready to go live with #eth2 + eip 1559 for #ethereum 🤝🕷 | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1266224756648361984 2020-05-28 21:28:01 -0700 <CHalexov2016> @AlexSaundersAU $eth #ethereum with be real strong with eth2 phase 0 with staking reliese and eip-1559 upgrade! Just watch! 😜🤝 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1266250667263311873 2020-05-28 23:10:59 -0700 <DegenSpartan> btw, BTC has better ponzinomics than ETH ETH does have 2.0 and EIP-1559 that will upgrade it and make it a better ponzi but who knows when this will happen? 2030 maybe | 2 replies 0 retweets 16 likes | |
| 1266318031027867648 2020-05-29 03:38:40 -0700 <CHalexov2016> Dear @Cointelegraph @CoinDesk @TheBlock__ @newsbtc @bravenewcoin do any of your authors or articles understand #ethereum proposal EIP-1559 ? Can world community get some article about it? Yesturday there was a great call by @TimBeiko about it.. DYOR 😜🤝🕷big Thanks | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1266330964575358976 2020-05-29 04:30:03 -0700 <FigoETH> @kevinsekniqi Mechanisms reinforcing the value accrual proposition of ETH: - Staking in PoS with likely 3-5 % and only around 0.5 % issuance - ETH locked up in Defi dapps as no. 1 trustless collateral making it more scarce - ETH burned with EIP1559 making it more scarce | 1 replies 1 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1266333247866384384 2020-05-29 04:39:08 -0700 <iamDCinvestor> @cyber_hokie @kevinsekniqi OP's Tweet is also intellectually dishonest as it ignores the continual development of EIP-1559 on eth1, and the inclusion of very similar mechanisms in the eth2 spec. At least Ava is showing its true colors, clearly for all to see. | 0 replies 0 retweets 7 likes | |
| 1266351218487590917 2020-05-29 05:50:32 -0700 <TimBeiko> @DennisonBertram Short answer is there will be a transition period where both types of Txns will be accepted. Block will gradually go from 0% to 100% EIP-1559-style txns, so wallets and dapps have ample time to migrate. | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1266353629885345792 2020-05-29 06:00:07 -0700 <indiv_0110> EIP1559が取り込まれているわけではないので、ガス代の使用量がEtherの価値に直結するわけではないのだけど、このガス代を払ってでもEthereumを使いたいと思えるユースケースが増えていることが重要。なお、ユーザーにとっては（略 Ethereum Daily Gas Used Chart https://t.co/nhngFbPe99 https://t.co/D6vCxNN9ru | 0 replies 3 retweets 11 likes | |
| 1266379267987800079 2020-05-29 07:42:00 -0700 <FigoETH> Generates interest in PoS ETH: YES (3-5%) Assets/Stablecoins: NOPE Gets burned once EIP 1559 is live ETH: YES Assets/Stablecoins: NOPE Most trustless asset within ecosystem for lockup in Defi ETH: YES Assets/Stablecoins: NOPE (but can also be locked up) | 1 replies 3 retweets 15 likes | |
| 1266405824571813893 2020-05-29 09:27:31 -0700 <Bamfious> @diskandartweet @phish73 @RyanSAdams EIP-1559 is where it is proposed. I think it will be included in a network upgrade after ETH2.0 is live for a while | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1266420206362152960 2020-05-29 10:24:40 -0700 <antiprosynth> @Foobazzler @galloway_the @FigoFinozeros @wmougayar @ethereum I'm not sure empirical evidence agrees with that. See EIP 1559, Ethereum 2.0, ... Very far from ossification. | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1266435608504762368 2020-05-29 11:25:52 -0700 <intocryptoast> Correct me if I'm wrong but with more than enough validators of ETH 2.0 for it to be sufficiently decentralised forever, issuance to be reduced and a burn mechanism introduced with EIP-1559, there's every chance that supply could be much reduced with scaling and cheaper fees? | 0 replies 1 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1266467391040561152 2020-05-29 13:32:10 -0700 <CHalexov2016> Yeah @dannyryan is a great guy and i am sure $eth upgrade to ETH2 is coming real soon! Btw @christine_dkim please do article about yesturday eip 1559 call by devs and @TimBeiko did great tweets... lets all world see ETH2+eip1559 is best combination in 2020 for @ethereum 🤝🕷 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1266472020054769664 2020-05-29 13:50:34 -0700 <CHalexov2016> $eth #ethereum is super cheap! Just wait eth2 staking + eip1559 reliese! Then we will see! This in 2020! But 2021 sharding and few 10k tps... next level of #blockchain 🤝🕷🕷🕷 https://t.co/GrWpV7A8OX | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1266472289777922053 2020-05-29 13:51:38 -0700 <RyanWatkins_> @_geonic @robustus @MessariCrypto Stablecoins - Not the argument, but on this point - stablecoins drive fees, which in the long-run will drive down issuance (with PoS and EIP 1559) Ethereum's security - If those tokens drive fees, i don't see the issue. Maybe you can tell me? | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1266497765804134400 2020-05-29 15:32:52 -0700 <0xTycoon> @hubert_btc @lastmjs The article is wrong because it missed an important detail as mentioned earlier. Most likely the annual issuance will be under %1, assuming 30M $ETH locked & staking. Also the article missed EIP-1559, which is a proposal to burn ETH which each transaction, reducing supply. | 2 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1266512502378168320 2020-05-29 16:31:25 -0700 <crypto4all_net> Ethereum Updates – ETH Futures And Progress On EIP 1559 https://t.co/ACkRxufTJ3 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1266513604389548034 2020-05-29 16:35:48 -0700 <Danamin14> Ethereum Updates – ETH Futures And Progress On EIP 1559 https://t.co/2XyBedui4n | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1266519956465815552 2020-05-29 17:01:03 -0700 <desktrading> Ethereum Updates - ETH Futures And Progress On EIP 1559 - CryptoTicker https://t.co/8nYRhETO3A | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1266523311648849921 2020-05-29 17:14:23 -0700 <9vest> Ethereum Updates – ETH Futures And Progress On EIP 1559 https://t.co/dKjWZVjXLV | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1266581613263159297 2020-05-29 21:06:03 -0700 <CryptoNewsify> Ethereum Updates - ETH Futures And Progress On EIP 1559 - https://t.co/HFT1kPz68l https://t.co/UktUJd2qx4 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1266584201366626306 2020-05-29 21:16:20 -0700 <GitcoinFeed> . Chris Carman@9037568 beat Quest: Fixing the Ethereum Fee Market (EIP-1559) https://t.co/xtiI5tO0hh | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1266596884094889985 2020-05-29 22:06:44 -0700 <CHalexov2016> @AlexSaundersAU Yeah #ethereum as eth2 + eip1559 are ready... | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1266597232771547144 2020-05-29 22:08:07 -0700 <CHalexov2016> Yeah before this crazy #coronavirus will end in the world... eth2 with eip1559 will be live! 😜🕷🤝 #ethereum 🥂🍾🏆 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1266602277999083520 2020-05-29 22:28:10 -0700 <CHalexov2016> $btc & $eth today jump... not bad! But #ethereum is stil super super cheap! Eth price nred to be at least 10% of #bitcoin ... so 0.10 and not only 0.024 btc today 🤪. Eth2+eip1559 are coming! 🤝🕷 https://t.co/vLvSLXOiEh | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1266615222631989249 2020-05-29 23:19:36 -0700 <Tetranode> Black Thur's drop to 90 makes this double-bottom even more PRONOUNCED than when I first posted! BTC's DB is 7mo, ETH is 18mo. Longer the timespan, clearer the signal. The multi-year rally will be driven by Phase0, EIP-1559, Phase1, Phase2, and the whole world. https://t.co/Fu9w0S49kn | 2 replies 4 retweets 13 likes | |
| 1266696165204131847 2020-05-30 04:41:14 -0700 <AlexMasmej> Have we seen any team upgrade their smart contract to save some gas on critical functions, even if it had some tradeoffs? If not, does that mean gas optimizations has less room for improvements than EIP1559, Layer 2 solutions and al? | 1 replies 1 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1266728484405207042 2020-05-30 06:49:40 -0700 <CHalexov2016> Yes true! Its network #blockchain upgrade! Just upgrade of #ethereum ! Not fork 🤪 see you soon on eth2+eip1559 🤝🕷😜 | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1266739607938441221 2020-05-30 07:33:52 -0700 <CHalexov2016> 250$ levels $eth #ethereum for June are here! July is time for eth2+eip1559 to go live! Or somebody know its going live in june? @a4fri & @dannyryan 🤝🕷🚀 https://t.co/7wt7Gdt1F0 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1266741023138549767 2020-05-30 07:39:29 -0700 <CHalexov2016> Still good time to sale you $bch $ltc $bnb $eos $xtz $bsv and buy cheap $eth #ethereum at 235$ levels before in few weeks eth2 go live and staking for eth start and later eip1559 eth gas burn proposal go live! We will see soon ATH for #ethereum! Btw 40 milion + wallets hodl eth🕷 | 0 replies 1 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1266742006065364993 2020-05-30 07:43:23 -0700 <CHalexov2016> Btw @Cointelegraph @CoinDesk @bravenewcoin @TheBlock__ @newsbtc and other.. its $eth #ethereum week! As you know eth2 staking eith eip1559 is going live in few weeks! 🤝 thanks @a4fri @dannyryan @ethereumJoseph @VitalikButerin @preston_vanloon @baselineproto @Consensys 🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷 https://t.co/f7jF1hjWBb | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1266925692534452225 2020-05-30 19:53:18 -0700 <GitcoinFeed> . • Deepthi Naidu@deepthinaidu played Quest: Ethereum EIP 1559 Fee Market https://t.co/DGcdeEExMn | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1266976485614764032 2020-05-30 23:15:08 -0700 <CHalexov2016> Where we go 😜🤝🕷... eth2 is so close! Staking + eip1559 are coming this summer! https://t.co/2o8w7RDeDJ | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1266989726176890881 2020-05-31 00:07:44 -0700 <CHalexov2016> @evan_van_ness hope you are ready for eth2+eip1559 going live next month 😜🤝🕷 $eth #ethereum upgrade is coming. 🤝🕷 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1266993227141349377 2020-05-31 00:21:39 -0700 <CHalexov2016> When $eth #ethereum upgrade to eth2 and pos aka staking go live with eip1559 (gasburn) then all this assets from list will give huge buy support to Eth! Few of this assets/blockchains have no utillity and no usecases and no community! Good luck if you still hodl it! 😜🤝🕷🕷🕷🕷 https://t.co/toZIe2sPlZ | 3 replies 4 retweets 12 likes | |
| 1267048381584748550 2020-05-31 04:00:49 -0700 <CHalexov2016> @a4fri The only question all world interested is, will ETH2 go live in Q2 as its promised few times by @VitalikButerin @ethereumJoseph @Consensys and other or its will be Q3. Also will EIP-1559 go live in Q3 or when? Thanks man and hush respect! Well done! BOW!🤝🕷 | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1267342612622704641 2020-05-31 23:29:59 -0700 <CHalexov2016> #bitcoin & #ethereum at ATH price 11th feb 2020. Today BTC 9550$ and ETH 238$ . Btc halving didnt bring any rise.. but ETH2 phase 0 reliese (staking ) and later eip1559 (gas burn) proposal will push $eth to new 2020 ATH levels... Hope you hodl 32 $eth so you can later stake. 🤝🕷 https://t.co/lTPwEK6gDf | 2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1267389503225946116 2020-06-01 02:36:19 -0700 <TheCurrencyA> Ethereum (ETH) Three Pillars of Scarcity in Bankless Podcast by Ryan and David - Link to Post: https://t.co/JKxZAsWM51 - Tags: #EthereumNews #ethereum #ETH #EIP1559 #ThreePillars #banklesspodcast .@VitalikButerin .@ethereum .@sydneyifergan https://t.co/jWocQkoRRU | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1267402855331311618 2020-06-01 03:29:22 -0700 <SCBuergel> I'm fairly late to join the #EIP1559 discussion, amazing work overall to improve economic efficiencies but some aspects have not really been covered in the technical discussions and are pretty weird https://t.co/NEtuAeAi1T 👇👇👇 | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1267446627058380801 2020-06-01 06:23:18 -0700 <econoar> @SCBuergel Eip1559 is about fixing fee UX first, the fee burn is a nice fall out effect. That said, these protocols are reliant on being economically successful. It’s very important to consider the economics of eth. If it didn’t matter, why not just issue 1000 eth per block? | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1267448245808234497 2020-06-01 06:29:44 -0700 <TimBeiko> Next up was an update from the EIP-1559 Implementers' call (see: https://t.co/quHf7OBZTR) from Besu's 1559 lead, @dimahledba: 1. We'll modify EIP-1559 to not have fixed blocks, and create a separate EIP about making the block sized fixed which can be an optional dependency | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1267448707672428546 2020-06-01 06:31:34 -0700 <TimBeiko> 2. It's not clear if and how EIP-1559 would work on a non-PoW network, this still needs to be discussed. 3. It's not clear if testnets or simulations are the best way to move this EIP forward. We're exploring both now. | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1267454967012454400 2020-06-01 06:56:26 -0700 <barnabemonnot> @onurhsolmaz Working on a similar problem for EIP 1559! One approach I have seen in fee market papers is to take a Poisson process for arrivals with valuations drawn from some CDF. Then agents can be given the choice to join or balk to make the demand endogeneous, avoiding uniform scaling | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1267477411660169216 2020-06-01 08:25:38 -0700 <SCBuergel> @econoar Re economic abstraction I don't see why we couldn't safely run a PoW @xdaichain that's so highly utilized that miners only get paid in $DAI (no block reward inflation) Re EIP1559, I'm worried about #EthIsMoney defeating my #EthereumIsTheMostAmazingTechnologyOfTheCentury meme | 2 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1267620191384592385 2020-06-01 17:52:59 -0700 <_cryptocactus> @RaoulGMI If we consider all the nice projects being built on top of ETH, DEFI, Baseline Protocol, EIP1559 (deflation), ETH 2.0 POS and maybe CBDC, it won't be a surprise to see ETH surpassing BTC's market cap. | 0 replies 1 retweets 7 likes | |
| 1267682092659486720 2020-06-01 21:58:57 -0700 <CHalexov2016> Good to watch to understand gas burn eip1559 proposal by @econoar and @VitalikButerin dev team. https://t.co/bXanPBOcCK https://t.co/whCIDSpYMp | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1267697659801935873 2020-06-01 23:00:49 -0700 <CHalexov2016> @CarpeNoctom btw good video from Chico about $eth eip1559 ... https://t.co/bXanPBOcCK | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1267697886671888390 2020-06-01 23:01:43 -0700 <CHalexov2016> Ethereum $eth longs! Holders know eth2 with eip 1559 is coming! | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1267698990155472896 2020-06-01 23:06:06 -0700 <CHalexov2016> @econoar @ChazSchmidt @StarkWareLtd @mstable_ @BalancerLabs @omgnetworkhq @spencernoon Good video explain about your eip1559 ... https://t.co/bXanPBOcCK | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1267699213007192064 2020-06-01 23:06:59 -0700 <CHalexov2016> @EthereumOnARM @prylabs Great video explain about eip1559 ... https://t.co/bXanPBOcCK | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1267699889816952832 2020-06-01 23:09:41 -0700 <CHalexov2016> @Bloqport Great video about eip1559 eth gas burn! https://t.co/bXanPBOcCK | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1267773724960395264 2020-06-02 04:03:04 -0700 <CHalexov2016> 25% jump/rise for $eth #ethereum in last 7 days! ETH is still real real cheap! ETH2+ eip1559 are coming real soon to ethereum network... devs are ready. 🤝🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷 https://t.co/3XmFgqzeCs | 0 replies 1 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1267779197197484038 2020-06-02 04:24:49 -0700 <CHalexov2016> 2020 ATH for $eth #ethereum is so close! With ETH2 upgrade to staking + eip1559 (eth gas burn) its will happen real soon! Full ETH2 in 2021 will bring $eth few 100 milion users/wallets/dapps! I will be so nice to have some eth also after 5... 10 ... 20 years! 🤝🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷 https://t.co/eFwwaZsXLj | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1267923895732129796 2020-06-02 13:59:48 -0700 <shakks> @sassal0x @DuneAnalytics Can't wait for EIP-1559. Number only going up. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1267999896495243264 2020-06-02 19:01:48 -0700 <santiagoroel> First look at how the EIP-1559 implementation would look like when determining gas price ⛽️ (courtesy of @metamask_io) https://t.co/X4WbhkcJd1 | 0 replies 0 retweets 6 likes | |
| 1268054649652654081 2020-06-02 22:39:22 -0700 <GitcoinFeed> . hesom@hesom played Quest: Fixing the Ethereum Fee Market (EIP-1559) https://t.co/ZHrRc7Kmza | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1268054869383905280 2020-06-02 22:40:14 -0700 <GitcoinFeed> . hesom@hesom beat Quest: Fixing the Ethereum Fee Market (EIP-1559) https://t.co/ZHrRc7Kmza | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1268098367722323969 2020-06-03 01:33:05 -0700 <MorganTBennett> 12/ Lower $ETH issuance would immediately decrease sell pressure. And, unlike the periodic halvings for #Bitcoin, this is not priced in. Together with EIP-1559, the issuance reduction can mitigate a design flaw of ETH1.x and become a powerful positive price driver. 🚀 | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1268098384256282629 2020-06-03 01:33:09 -0700 <MorganTBennett> 23/ A an investor, enthusiast, and believer in #Ethereum, I would strongly support a block subsidy reduction to 0.8 $ETH, alongside a fee market upgrade in the spirit of EIP-1559. | 1 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1268104706158542848 2020-06-03 01:58:16 -0700 <0xTycoon> @iDecentralized Wallets are not that good at predicting the gas price, EIP-1559 fixes this! 😉 | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1268361155581374464 2020-06-03 18:57:19 -0700 <safetyth1rd> @reyvas @JimmyRagosa EIP 1559 has become one with the coronavirus. | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1268375943913132032 2020-06-03 19:56:04 -0700 <CarlGocht> @JimmyRagosa this doesnt really work because ETH2 phase 0 and eip1559 wont help with scaling | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1268436381744971779 2020-06-03 23:56:14 -0700 <CHalexov2016> Btw friends just see what happen with @CardanoStiftung $ada #cardano asset price right after news about its going live soon with POS aka staking! This chain have no utillity/usecase and rise so much! Now just think what will happen with #ethereum pos going live + eip1559+ tps up https://t.co/lwrP9z7P9c | 1 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1268457018022522880 2020-06-04 01:18:14 -0700 <GitcoinFeed> . • Deepthi Naidu@deepthinaidu played Quest: Fixing the Ethereum Fee Market (EIP-1559) https://t.co/DGcdeEExMn | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1268505751678603264 2020-06-04 04:31:53 -0700 <xccybasis> @DTAPCAP 1) rate of return comes Q3 by staking (first of three phases of massive upgrade 2) already seeing amazing scalability by computing off chain (layer 2 OmiseGo, Matic) 3) scalability by rollups already happening 4) EIP 1559 to reduce/burn issuance 5) accelerated adoption, holders | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1268514885442269185 2020-06-04 05:08:11 -0700 <HGerbal> Ponzis, pyramids, and similar schemes are now among the top spenders of #Ethereum transaction fees! While measures like EIP 1559 aim to provide short-term relief for the ether gas price problem, the real solution lies in improving Ethereum’s scalability https://t.co/GaVBKKcats | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1268519159803019264 2020-06-04 05:25:10 -0700 <Psychonaut4975> @YannickLegendre @TheDaoMaker @DappRadar @SimilarWeb @idexio @KyberNetwork @WINkorg @MustacheTommy @1inchExchange @NewdexOfficial @compoundfinance @UniswapRocks Their blockchains permit to use smart contracts with paying basically no fees this way they can basically washtrade their dApps for free EIP1559 will proove to eth-killers that having a relevant fee structure is important for the security and the long-term value of the network🤠 | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1268564577203019781 2020-06-04 08:25:38 -0700 <DegenSpartan> another excellent podcast episode w/ @kyled116 - VCs can NOT sit in BTC / ETH because they cant charge investors to hodl - kyle makes a bullish case for all the grayscale products - ETH staking + EIP-1559 will have "material" impact - as a trader, denominates portfolio in BTC | 3 replies 5 retweets 31 likes | |
| 1268566481555472390 2020-06-04 08:33:12 -0700 <0xTycoon> @1inchExchange @ethereum The limit could probably be increased to 16m, but that would be the maximum. Note that EIP-1559 proposes to abolish the miner-voted limit in favour of 16m max, targeting 10m. (That means the Base Fee would be adjusted up if below 10m, or up if above 10m) | 0 replies 1 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1268573643333701632 2020-06-04 09:01:40 -0700 <0xTycoon> @vdWijden @1inchExchange @VitalikButerin The above link is for EIP-1559. It proposes to abolish the miner-voted "block gas limit" in favour of 16m max, while adjusting what's known as the "Base Fee" to target 10m. (That means the Base Fee would be adjusted up if below 10m, or up if above 10m). | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1268592785214636034 2020-06-04 10:17:43 -0700 <FrancescoRenziA> @lemiscate My thesis is most of these transactions are some sort of miner money laundry scheme. I find it hard to imagine there are thousands of users using metamask to run these scams. Paying real money (ETH) for transactions BURNING fees would make a world of difference. EIP 1559 now! | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1268684830977507329 2020-06-04 16:23:29 -0700 <RyanSAdams> When EIP1559 gets implemented ETH price goes to $1559 1559 for $1559 | 28 replies 19 retweets 185 likes | |
| 1268720025508237312 2020-06-04 18:43:20 -0700 <ejaaz_a> @RyanSAdams EIP1559 is not priced in. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1268770427138179074 2020-06-04 22:03:37 -0700 <hornyak_ki> @RyanSAdams Any ETA on EIP1559 yet? | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1268920898884472836 2020-06-05 08:01:32 -0700 <owocki> @tokenstate @lukestokes EIP 1559 fixes this! | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1269475968181104641 2020-06-06 20:47:11 -0700 <GitcoinFeed> . • Deepthi Naidu@deepthinaidu played Quest: EIP 1559 Fee Market https://t.co/DGcdeEExMn | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1269693594740436993 2020-06-07 11:11:57 -0700 <CHalexov2016> Eth2 is every day closer! Staking + eip1559 gas burn ... see you soon at 0.10 $btc price for 1 $eth friends. | 0 replies 1 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1269742737311461376 2020-06-07 14:27:13 -0700 <elusivechad> @glassnode EIP 1559 NOW!!! Deflation! | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1269744268769460224 2020-06-07 14:33:19 -0700 <elusivechad> ETH's velocity is around 30% daily, while BTC's velocity is closer to 10% daily. In an EIP 1559 world this is big. Few understand this. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1269931014454829057 2020-06-08 02:55:22 -0700 <vjsingh102> Another major upgrade for this would be #EIP1559 which completely overhauls the fee market and creates a native #ETH burn mechanism. Current gas price auction mechanisms are creating a lot of unnecessary price bloat. This has also progressed a lot. https://t.co/8ihEOrS55a | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1269953408783446017 2020-06-08 04:24:21 -0700 <johnsaipan> @CurrencyTycoon When EIP-1559 ? | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1269994872737423361 2020-06-08 07:09:07 -0700 <0xTycoon> @johnsaipan EIP-1559 won't be in anytime soon, the priority is on ETH 2.0 phase 0. Although, the momentum for it has increased and there's been two "Implementers' Calls" on it already, and so far the devs are getting a feel for the specification and refining it. | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1269995715905720327 2020-06-08 07:12:28 -0700 <0xTycoon> @johnsaipan Here's a FAQ on EIP-1559 https://t.co/hcjLLO4T1V Also details of the last dev 2 calls call 1 https://t.co/hf0BFcUtaV call 2 https://t.co/WQB9NCOH13 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1270055292059910145 2020-06-08 11:09:12 -0700 <CHalexov2016> 2020 $eth #ethereum chart! With staking.. we will soon see new 2020 ATH for #eth this year. Eth2 upgrade is coming real soon! Staking+eip1559 gas burn 🤝🕷🪐🪐🪐 good luck friends 😜 https://t.co/FpGGD4L32r | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1270059811103801346 2020-06-08 11:27:10 -0700 <gregzaj1> @RyanSAdams EIP-1559 Name ideas: Fahrenheit 1559? Bradbury? | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1270060191250145288 2020-06-08 11:28:40 -0700 <vjsingh102> #Ethereum's slowest transaction costs are now officially much higher than that of #Bitcoin. There was a time when I would choose the former over the latter for value transfer because of the transaction costs. Times are a-changing. Eagerly waiting for #EIP1559. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1270084815140814853 2020-06-08 13:06:31 -0700 <caioinveste> EIP 1559: The Final Puzzle-Piece to Ethereum’s Monetary Policy by @TrustlessState https://t.co/245FZUUDV7 | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1270156451802120192 2020-06-08 17:51:11 -0700 <ShadySlimFast> @StakeSats with staking and eip 1559 its at its most interesting, just haven't found the same core belief as BTC yet. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1270297289009975297 2020-06-09 03:10:49 -0700 <Cretters> @JimmyRagosa what's a good succinct (article) explanation of eip 1559? | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1270362687181029376 2020-06-09 07:30:41 -0700 <antiprosynth> @coincodecap @tradingview Here's a great explanation: What's still missing from that explanation is the impending implementation of EIP 1559: https://t.co/mlioy7Z6oR https://t.co/muvaqV8cqb | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1270413157278744576 2020-06-09 10:51:14 -0700 <POVCryptoPod> 141 - @kyled116 of Three Arrows Capital share his insights with the current state of BTC & ETH markets - Post-halving Bitcoin - Investing in @DeribitExchange and @TheRealBlockFi - Staking + EIP1559 -> ETH Narrative - Traders denominate in BTC - @GrayscaleInvest is a vacuum | 1 replies 4 retweets 15 likes | |
| 1270436402883448838 2020-06-09 12:23:36 -0700 <CHalexov2016> @TheCryptoCactus 500$ + .. just start pos and stop pow .. + add eip1559 and later 160 tps... i see easy 1000$+ | 0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1270443798636740609 2020-06-09 12:52:59 -0700 <FinRipae> I am completely fascinated by EIP 1559, and as always, @TrustlessState does a great job of breaking it all down here: https://t.co/Y5aB3cc1kZ | 0 replies 7 retweets 12 likes | |
| 1270451402377224204 2020-06-09 13:23:12 -0700 <CHalexov2016> Come on @dannyryan @preston_vanloon @prylabs @ethnimbus @VitalikButerin @ethereumJoseph and other.. i think its time for eth2 and staking reliese counter to go live.. so all can see when we will be able to stake $eth #ethereum 🤝🕷 and yeah also counter for eip1559 is welcome.🕷 | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1270580907255238657 2020-06-09 21:57:49 -0700 <__Meir__> @BanklessHQ @nic__carter I was surprised when you nodded in agreement when he said that Eip 1559 might not be effective because it might not cause users to buy more Eth. Isn't the point that it gives miners less eth to sell? | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1270618430501240833 2020-06-10 00:26:55 -0700 <Fiskantes> @kiri79818724 @tokenterminal Ofc, this just serves as a projection/assumption base for future - PoS + EIP 1559 that will transit the value capture to ETH stakers and holders in general. https://t.co/TrDR1EzKsI | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1270663401937817600 2020-06-10 03:25:37 -0700 <CHalexov2016> @IvanOnTech 6)eip1559 gas burn | 0 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1270680070009618438 2020-06-10 04:31:51 -0700 <VitalikButerin> @BanklessHQ @RyanSAdams @nic__carter ... What EIP 1559 *does* change is it removes the aspect that these coins go into the hands of a miner who will often sell them. | 2 replies 5 retweets 22 likes | |
| 1270707959429918720 2020-06-10 06:22:40 -0700 <the_crypto_feed> deribit insights: analysis of eip-1559 https://t.co/MMF4kgLnKR | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1270708840644870144 2020-06-10 06:26:10 -0700 <gakonst> EIP1559 is one of Ethereum's most anticipated changes. However, it's been met with skepticism for not having received rigorous enough analysis. @hasufl and I analyzed the proposal for @DeribitInsights: https://t.co/mgsyn6ttgp | 5 replies 18 retweets 97 likes | |
| 1270708992629706752 2020-06-10 06:26:47 -0700 <hasufl> EIP-1559 is one of Ethereum's most anticipated changes. If implemented, it would have far-reaching consequences for users, miners, and even the security of Ethereum itself. A comprehensive analysis from @gakonst and me for @DeribitInsights is out now. https://t.co/YJOwcXe3DA | 28 replies 173 retweets 550 likes | |
| 1270709640679100418 2020-06-10 06:29:21 -0700 <cryptow1re> reddit 🤖: Analysis of EIP-1559 - Deribit Insights https://t.co/cYxL5x0kWE | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1270710698763575297 2020-06-10 06:33:33 -0700 <DeribitExchange> A comprehensive analysis of EIP-1559, one of Ethereum's most anticipated changes. By @gakonst and @hasufl Out now on: @DeribitInsights https://t.co/DXXhqQDGwD | 0 replies 3 retweets 10 likes | |
| 1270711001080463362 2020-06-10 06:34:45 -0700 <DeribitInsights> EIP-1559 is one of Ethereum's most anticipated changes. If implemented, it would have far-reaching consequences for users, miners, and even the security of Ethereum itself. A comprehensive analysis from @gakonst and @hasufl is out now. https://t.co/qgOJnuyLar | 0 replies 3 retweets 6 likes | |
| 1270711641295015936 2020-06-10 06:37:18 -0700 <veliko_test3> Analysis of EIP-1559 - Deribit Insights https://t.co/n3cwOCSM7N | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1270712759835955200 2020-06-10 06:41:45 -0700 <hasufl> In our opinion, you should learn about EIP-1559 even if you don't care about Ethereum at all. Elastic blocksize caps and congestion control systems could become an important building block in securing Bitcoin post block subsidy. | 11 replies 8 retweets 81 likes | |
| 1270713378168684545 2020-06-10 06:44:12 -0700 <sassal0x> This is the best write-up I've seen on EIP-1559 (the proposed new fee market mechanism for Ethereum). I highly recommend giving it a read. https://t.co/V9LV83avuI | 3 replies 29 retweets 101 likes | |
| 1270713505197375492 2020-06-10 06:44:43 -0700 <edmundedgar> @hasufl Soft-fork EIP1559 substituting a miner fee pool for the burn, makes bitcoin sustainable and has the benefit that it can be implemented purely by the miners, no need to persuade devs or users | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1270718301899853825 2020-06-10 07:03:46 -0700 <intcryptonews> Analysis of EIP-1559 - Deribit Insights International CryptoCurrency News https://t.co/yOPRIjUuFC | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1270718530246176768 2020-06-10 07:04:41 -0700 <antiprosynth> @IvanOnTech I think you've been out of the loop a bit, Ivan. Raiden and Plasma are yesterday's news in terms of layer 2 scalability. Also EIP 1559 (fee burning) is missing. | 3 replies 0 retweets 11 likes | |
| 1270720687322198026 2020-06-10 07:13:15 -0700 <VitalikButerin> @troxader @sassal0x Definitely a mistake. I'm expecting EIP 1559 to greatly reduce the rate of things like this happening by reducing the need for users to try to set fees manually. | 19 replies 13 retweets 122 likes | |
| 1270726851372052480 2020-06-10 07:37:44 -0700 <DegenSpartan> excellent rundown of EIP-1559 if you haven't caught up to speed about it yet, then put aside 10 minutes and read this now or later today | 0 replies 1 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1270731679498407936 2020-06-10 07:56:56 -0700 <OisinKyne> The way transaction fees on Ethereum work will be changed as part of the network upgrade known as EIP-1559. Instead of the miners getting all of the fees, they will instead be destroyed, reducing the rate of inflation of Ether, with the option of a miner tip for a faster tx. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1270735749667643394 2020-06-10 08:13:06 -0700 <KiyoshiMatsumo5> Comprehensive review on EIP 1559 on eth regarding token burns and fee structure | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1270739834429214727 2020-06-10 08:29:20 -0700 <Provatidis> Definitely a must read for EIP-1559 | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1270744445693186048 2020-06-10 08:47:39 -0700 <Shaughnessy119> Great work by @hasufl and @gakonst on EIP-1559. To the point analysis on the UX benefits, elastic block size, security and game theory by miners. | 1 replies 4 retweets 16 likes | |
| 1270748888962564097 2020-06-10 09:05:19 -0700 <alextreece1> Great write up on EIP-1559, one of the most meaningful possible developments for public blockchains right now | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1270753945615568899 2020-06-10 09:25:24 -0700 <Fatalmeh> Fine I did my research and I guess it's EIP1559 https://t.co/3qvyYEv5mh | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1270756193825361923 2020-06-10 09:34:20 -0700 <Fatalmeh> although it goes way further than just capping the gas, which could be an easier EIP to implement BUT might slow down acceptance and implementation of EIP 1559 Did I miss something? | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1270761334976716801 2020-06-10 09:54:46 -0700 <bees_neeth> Recommended reading from @gakonst and @hasufl - they've done a great overview of eip-1559 and it's crucial we understand why this is such an important update for the Ethereum ecosystem! | 0 replies 0 retweets 7 likes | |
| 1270777306328584194 2020-06-10 10:58:14 -0700 <PhABCD> EIP-1559 will work as expected and has no downside or risks associated. | 2 replies 3 retweets 12 likes | |
| 1270812267957846017 2020-06-10 13:17:09 -0700 <JBmastercrypto> When $ETH 2.0? When EIP 1559? Someone please tell me! IM TIRED OF THIS HIGH GAS PRICES! | 0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1270816504590807044 2020-06-10 13:33:59 -0700 <StefanDGeorge> The current Ethereum fee market is one major blocker for adoption. @hasufl and @gakonst analyzed how EIP-1559 by @econoar and @VitalikButerin make fees more predictable and helps to resolve network congestion. Worth reading: https://t.co/RWXEiSELqI | 2 replies 18 retweets 74 likes | |
| 1270817446639828993 2020-06-10 13:37:44 -0700 <erichdylus> EIP-1559 has some pretty significant implications for both the UX and economics of #Ethereum, including burning transaction fees and slacking blockspace. Thorough overview by @DeribitInsights here: | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1270822452038381580 2020-06-10 13:57:37 -0700 <hasufl> @danfinlay @_prestwich This risk exists in every blockchain and is not specific to EIP-1559. We have no reason to assume that miners will do *this* specific MASF, but none of the other ones that also seem profitable before considering the reasons I gave. | 1 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1270827042762825728 2020-06-10 14:15:52 -0700 <hessam_salehi> Good EIP-1559 analysis about how this EIP makes fees more predictable. https://t.co/vFPsxAM0Oj | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1270827211285725184 2020-06-10 14:16:32 -0700 <RyanSAdams> "One could say that EIP-1559 assumes a perpetual block subsidy for miners for the protocol to be secure. But the better way of thinking about this would be to say that it makes perpetual block subsidy much more palatable as a design option." Yes. Minimum necessary issuance. | 2 replies 5 retweets 31 likes | |
| 1270827212623818752 2020-06-10 14:16:32 -0700 <RyanSAdams> source: https://t.co/FQUZK1XKRm excellent write up by @hasufl and @gakonst on EIP1559 | 0 replies 2 retweets 7 likes | |
| 1270827940721418240 2020-06-10 14:19:26 -0700 <DeepBlueCrypto> @RyanSAdams EIP 1559 to #Ethereum $1559 | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1270828942019006464 2020-06-10 14:23:25 -0700 <econoar> Me watching everyone slowly fall in love with EIP-1559. https://t.co/0DHXnPlKqh | 5 replies 6 retweets 74 likes | |
| 1270846774803079170 2020-06-10 15:34:16 -0700 <hasufl> @edmundedgar @antiprosynth @StefanDGeorge @gakonst @econoar @VitalikButerin I guess @antiprosynth is saying that even non-stakers passively benefit from EIP-1559. However, this also applies to PoS. Even ETH that doesn’t stake becomes more valuable from a PoW->PoS switch. | 2 replies 0 retweets 10 likes | |
| 1270855950895906816 2020-06-10 16:10:44 -0700 <ashwinrz> Great article by @hasufl on EIP-1559 "(EIP-1559's) ability to set minimum fees in the protocol opens a new design space, ranging from elastic blocksize, perpetual block subsidy, better resistance against economic abstraction, to better auction models going forward." | 0 replies 0 retweets 6 likes | |
| 1270873693288267776 2020-06-10 17:21:14 -0700 <erm_io> @sassal0x A good UX could prevent it by putting cap on fee (at least for the current nature of ETH). If the goal is adoption, avg. users should be protected from such mistakes. EIP-1559 is a good step but I wonder how its tipping feature won’t end up in sth like this. (By capped tipping?) | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1270880110032433152 2020-06-10 17:46:44 -0700 <begcoins> Wrap your mind around EIP-1559 to really understand where $eth is really going. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1270923633091739648 2020-06-10 20:39:41 -0700 <DeFi_Dad> The most important article on #Ethereum in 2020. EIP-1559 means: 🔥A better UX 🔥Better security 🔥Enforce txns burn ETH to ensure its reserve status 🔥Solve for volatility in blockspace demand with a slack mechanism, allowing some blocks to be larger as long as some are smaller | 0 replies 8 retweets 31 likes | |
| 1270942622035570689 2020-06-10 21:55:08 -0700 <longbolilun> The most important article on #Ethereum in 2020. EIP-1559 means: 🔥A better UX 🔥Better security 🔥Enforce txns burn ETH to ensure its reserve status 🔥Solve for volatility in blockspace demand with a slack mechanism, allowing some blocks to be larger as long as some are smaller | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1270945328972341249 2020-06-10 22:05:54 -0700 <agtereshko> Ethereum developers are considering a proposal that would improve transaction fees and help solve network congestion. That proposal, EIP-1559, has been under discussion since April 2019 and has the potential. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1270961510450368512 2020-06-10 23:10:12 -0700 <MyGrowmo> Read my Jun 11 Newsletter featuring “Analysis of EIP-1559 - Deribit Insights” https://t.co/2BgPNEH6oV | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1270985904082096129 2020-06-11 00:47:07 -0700 <webnowcompany> #BTC #GAS #ETH Ethereum developers are considering a proposal that would improve transaction fees and help solve network congestion. That proposal, EIP-1559, has been und...Read more: https://t.co/NzCdOWR65X | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1271003813051236352 2020-06-11 01:58:17 -0700 <TechnocracyA> @lawmaster EIP 1559 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1271009024234962945 2020-06-11 02:19:00 -0700 <stonecoldpat0> @Deathpup1 @svantetobias @sassal0x thankfully even with EIP-1559, I'd think the fee would be in the "tip" and the miner still gets it. lol so there is some way to recover | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1271032295827390464 2020-06-11 03:51:28 -0700 <hasufl> @JHancock Someone accidentally paid a huge fee. If we have to draw a connection to EIP-1559, that wallets can pay the minimum tip most of the time seems to make mistakes like that less likely. Fat-fingering FEE_CAP would have no effect, since FEECAP is the same for everyone. | 1 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1271038340679102465 2020-06-11 04:15:29 -0700 <kumavis_> EIP-1559 fails to replace the single-price auction mechanic | 1 replies 1 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1271046158874525696 2020-06-11 04:46:33 -0700 <nat__top> @yahgwai @UniswapProtocol Great thread! I am trying to get my head around EIP-1559 and the gas token fit in there (if it gets implemented... yeah, it will :)) any thoughts? | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1271046936187949057 2020-06-11 04:49:39 -0700 <shingen_crypto> EIP1559はかなり大きな提案だったが、ここでDerbitによる分析記事が登場。 今のFeeモデルが如何にEthereumの利便性と拡大を妨げているのかを考えればよくわかる。 | 1 replies 1 retweets 11 likes | |
| 1271059062860460034 2020-06-11 05:37:50 -0700 <yangWao> @DennisonBertram @intocryptoast Now it will be because EIP-1559 and ETH2.0 🌝🤔 | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1271061073584517120 2020-06-11 05:45:49 -0700 <CCassets> EIP1559でマイニングFeeはいったいどう変わるの？ざっくりまとめ。（暫定案） 1,TXfeeは全て焼かれます。 2,ブロックサイズ10Mgasを基準に上下12.5%の可変、最大20Mgasブロック 3,ブロック利用率によりfeeが可変。ブロック毎一律。 4, https://t.co/EzzqFZaJS8 | 1 replies 4 retweets 20 likes | |
| 1271065216734736385 2020-06-11 06:02:17 -0700 <CCassets> 今の仕様をEIP1559で置き換えたとすると、 現状マイニングfeeは約0.4ETHほどだから、 可変ブロックサイズは予測になるけど、大凡30%程度の供給ペース削減になると見込める。 仮にEth2.0で同じ仕様で入ると、新規供給よりも焼き込みfeeの方が多くなってデフレトークンになっちゃうね。 | 1 replies 1 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1271067412775854080 2020-06-11 06:11:01 -0700 <CCassets> 今のインフレ率が約4%とするならば、 EIP1559の導入で、 インフレ率2.8%くらいになるのでは？という感じか。 （ちなみにBitcoinのインフレ率は今は1.65%くらい。） Eth1.0はEth2.0が始まるまでに供給半減が予定されている。（インフレ率1.4~2%） Eth2.0では約0.2%程度のインフレ率の予定？ | 0 replies 1 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1271068532772667392 2020-06-11 06:15:28 -0700 <LarryChiang> Lock in a thing. One thing. EIP-1559, #cs183e, #stramgt353 & #EIP1659 seem out there. But a FICO of 800 on a credit line of $300 is at the ❤️ | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1271126104074567685 2020-06-11 10:04:14 -0700 <stonecoldpat0> @dankrad @danfinlay @CurrencyTycoon @hasufl @nicksdjohnson @_prestwich @gakonst Current approach looks to be better. No need to wait for base fee to decrease to include a transaction, can include immediately (even if the miner loses $$ due to not including a higher paid tx). - Reducing impact of bribery for tx inclusion. EIP-1559 is better as you must burn | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1271126532812156929 2020-06-11 10:05:56 -0700 <stonecoldpat0> @dankrad @danfinlay @CurrencyTycoon @hasufl @nicksdjohnson @_prestwich @gakonst - A metric for measuring congestion. What I really like about EIP-1559 is that we now have a single metric for measuring congestion. This doesn't exist in the current system at all. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1271127817137291272 2020-06-11 10:11:02 -0700 <dankrad> @danfinlay @CurrencyTycoon @hasufl @nicksdjohnson @_prestwich @gakonst I don't think so. Basically under EIP1559 the rational strategy (for non-super-urgent, i.e. can wait up to 10 minutes in super-congested times transactions) is setting tip=1 and basefee=whatever you value the transaction at. Very simple. | 2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1271128551216107520 2020-06-11 10:13:57 -0700 <stonecoldpat0> @dankrad @danfinlay @CurrencyTycoon @hasufl @nicksdjohnson @_prestwich @gakonst I dunno about this. It seems like the tip is a way to distinguish transactions with the same maxfee. e.g. i'll include tip=2 > tip=1, if there is space. that is what we plan to do with our relayer when EIP-1559 goes live. set a tip that is slightly higher than others | 2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1271130068786577410 2020-06-11 10:19:59 -0700 <stonecoldpat0> @danfinlay @dankrad @CurrencyTycoon @hasufl @nicksdjohnson @_prestwich @gakonst ahhahahahaa that is so funny. tbh i really hope by the time EIP-1559 is released we have a really good mempool inspector, so we just front-run the top 20m (or so) gas of transactions | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1271130923178831872 2020-06-11 10:23:23 -0700 <dankrad> @danfinlay @CurrencyTycoon @hasufl @nicksdjohnson @_prestwich @gakonst OK, let's do an example. I value my transaction at $2, but for 10 hrs the price is at $10. Neither today nor with EIP1559 can my transaction be included within these 10 hrs. And clearly it wouldn't be fair as it would be replacing transactions paying more. | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1271131249336344576 2020-06-11 10:24:40 -0700 <dankrad> @danfinlay @CurrencyTycoon @hasufl @nicksdjohnson @_prestwich @gakonst So this is not a solvable problem. EIP 1559 solve the problem only when you are willing to pay the market price for transactions, but it's difficult for you to guess what exactly the fair market price would be when your transaction gets included. | 2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1271140570698637312 2020-06-11 11:01:43 -0700 <nicksdjohnson> @dankrad @danfinlay @CurrencyTycoon @hasufl @_prestwich @gakonst Question is, how common is that? It seems to me it's only common during times when network demand is changing - the exact time when this mechanism in EIP1559 fails and it reverts to a first-price auction. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1271151695607758849 2020-06-11 11:45:55 -0700 <stonecoldpat0> @dankrad @danfinlay @CurrencyTycoon @hasufl @nicksdjohnson @_prestwich @gakonst I think there is a subtle difference. In EIP-1559, the miners potentially know your max bid and if they change their behaviour then they can compute their maximum gain If they artificially increase gas price, they can't predict their maximum gain as easily. | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1271161186621554689 2020-06-11 12:23:38 -0700 <aliatiia_> @dankrad @nicksdjohnson @danfinlay @CurrencyTycoon @hasufl @_prestwich @gakonst Evidence for this is staring us in the face: the slightest hiccup in supply (block delay b/c Poisson) and/or demand (spikes due to volatility or scams etc) and users just go crazy with gas prices, they're not waiting. EIP 1559 makes it more costly but honey badger don't care | 2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1271166145333047296 2020-06-11 12:43:20 -0700 <danfinlay> This will probably be the most concise summary of my critique of eip-1559 I write today. Stepping away from the debate if I can, I have other things I want to do! | 0 replies 2 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1271184825270112257 2020-06-11 13:57:34 -0700 <joeybagodon> @thetaseek Bitcoiners seem to care much more about when ETH 2.0 is going to be released than anyone else. The eth/btc rally is being driven by the much bullish news around EIP1559 (ie BASEFEE burns) | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1271187158758539268 2020-06-11 14:06:50 -0700 <bytwork> Проблема масштабируемости #Ethereum решена - (EIP-1559) Ethereum может ввести новую и упрощенную систему комиссий за транзакции с меньшими затратами для пользователей. https://t.co/Wg2GvmttYT | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1271222174720950273 2020-06-11 16:25:59 -0700 <dankrad> @nicksdjohnson @aliatiia_ @danfinlay @CurrencyTycoon @hasufl @_prestwich @gakonst That is simply incorrect. When demand is increasing, your transaction currently may not be included for many hours (which has happened to me many times). That simply won't happen if you are willing to pay the market price in EIP1559. You just have to wait a few minutes at most. | 2 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1271233489937920001 2020-06-11 17:10:57 -0700 <nicksdjohnson> @CurrencyTycoon @dankrad @avsa @hasufl @danfinlay @_prestwich @gakonst EIP 1559 is a proposal for ETH 1.0, which uses PoW. | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1271237526322208770 2020-06-11 17:26:59 -0700 <0xTycoon> @nicksdjohnson @dankrad @avsa @hasufl @danfinlay @_prestwich @gakonst I see. In that case, I would not support EIP-1559 in PoW, or any change to PoW for that matter and I think it's better to abandon PoW than injecting it with steroids 😅 What is your opinion on EIP-1559 for PoS though? | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1271239532281827328 2020-06-11 17:34:57 -0700 <dankrad> @aliatiia_ @nicksdjohnson @danfinlay @CurrencyTycoon @hasufl @_prestwich @gakonst No they aren't. In fact EIP1559 can give you much more transparency into the demand curve by inspecting fee caps. In the status quo you can't do that, and you keep guessing the demand curve, which is the reason for the bad UX. | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1271239747160043520 2020-06-11 17:35:48 -0700 <0xTycoon> @nicksdjohnson @mysticryuujin @dankrad @avsa @hasufl @danfinlay @_prestwich @gakonst Currently you can send a 0 fee transaction and then pay the miner with a credit card or some other token... Economic abstraction is the main problem. EIP-1559 fixes this. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1271241900020977665 2020-06-11 17:44:22 -0700 <dankrad> @aliatiia_ @nicksdjohnson @danfinlay @CurrencyTycoon @hasufl @_prestwich @gakonst Fact 1: Block size elasticity *without the tax* would be impossible Fact 2: The tax is necessary in order to have a gas price oracle, enabling proposals like this: https://t.co/dM95zITItW [which, without EIP1559, simply doesn't work] | 2 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1271246868844961793 2020-06-11 18:04:06 -0700 <0xTycoon> @nicksdjohnson @mysticryuujin @dankrad @avsa @hasufl @danfinlay @_prestwich @gakonst Paying a "mining accelerator" with a credit card? Yes. I actually did that with BTC once 😔 Also re. the problem with GasTokens, wouldn't EIP-1559 put a wrench in it? | 2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1271250361320439809 2020-06-11 18:17:59 -0700 <dankrad> @nicksdjohnson @aliatiia_ @danfinlay @CurrencyTycoon @hasufl @_prestwich @gakonst Lol but that's a different issue. I support that as well. But really the solution is scaling. Maybe the confusion is that EIP1559 isn't about lowering gas prices, but just making them more predictable? | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1271251387494600704 2020-06-11 18:22:04 -0700 <aliatiia_> @dankrad @nicksdjohnson @danfinlay @CurrencyTycoon @hasufl @_prestwich @gakonst Dampen the erratic behavior of users when setting gasPrice or FEECAP/GASPREMIUM under EIP 1559 such that tx's are spread around nicely. Differently: I question the efficacy of BASEFEE as ushering traffic during rush hours. Demand is very inelastic during those periods | 2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1271251454997655552 2020-06-11 18:22:20 -0700 <0xTycoon> @nicksdjohnson @mysticryuujin @dankrad @avsa @hasufl @danfinlay @_prestwich @gakonst But yeah. Right now, what stops miners themselves engaging in mining a gastoken? Basically no extra cost for them... They can then put it on Uniswap. With EIP1559 they will have to pay something | 2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1271263156803756032 2020-06-11 19:08:50 -0700 <0xTycoon> As part of being a Customer Support rep, my job is to discuss some of your issues & concerns with the developers and get them to see your view. I know you guys keep on having problems with estimating gas fees asking when EIP-1559. Here's a thread I've recently participated in | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1271273619633647617 2020-06-11 19:50:24 -0700 <farmwell123> Ethereum's Decentralized Future hinges on EIP 1559 in a major way p2p networks do not build network effects on the backs of high transaction costs | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1271287552759132160 2020-06-11 20:45:46 -0700 <harukatarotaro> あとで続き読む Analysis of EIP-1559 - Deribit Insights https://t.co/N6wMcOnySI | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1271303131499048960 2020-06-11 21:47:40 -0700 <CrespusMaximus> @LeahWald @stevenmcclurg @BeExponential EIP 1559 *ETA before end of 2020* (Ethereum improvement proposal) will enact a max gas limit which won't be egregious. Burning gas(deflationary) = higher ETH price =secure the network. Not to mention scaling upgrades ala zksnarks/rollups Do more research please. Thanks | 0 replies 2 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1271345018448621568 2020-06-12 00:34:07 -0700 <ChainNewscom> 【深入解读以太坊重大热议提案 EIP 1559：用户体验、松弛机制与安全性等】以太坊费率机制最大的问题之一就是费用估算，EIP-1559 试图通过让所有交易尽可能支付相同的费率，来解决这一问题。 https://t.co/0dWttNNOMn | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1271362578552422400 2020-06-12 01:43:54 -0700 <cryptow1re> reddit 🤖: EIP 1559 Aims to Solve Issue of Ethereum Txns with High ETH Fees - Ethereum World News https://t.co/i7squwdZBH | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1271367654868086785 2020-06-12 02:04:04 -0700 <thecsstreet> EIP 1559 Aims to Solve Issue of Ethereum Txns with High ETH Fees https://t.co/8ta90flPch | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1271368314963603457 2020-06-12 02:06:41 -0700 <tron_age> EIP 1559 Aims to Solve Issue of Ethereum Txns with High ETH Fees #blockchain #dlike #cryptocurrency https://t.co/z55F9GTADm | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1271373457863909376 2020-06-12 02:27:07 -0700 <johnmorganFL> EIP 1559 Aims to Solve Issue of #Ethereum Txns with High #ETH Fees https://t.co/nxBkvh38XT https://t.co/VDWuUXdWWt | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1271385020570062848 2020-06-12 03:13:04 -0700 <ChaiNext_> In order to solve the problem of #Ethereum's huge handling fee that has appeared repeatedly recently, the community put forward the EIP 1559 proposal. It is hoped that the basic network fees will be adjusted through network demand to change the current charging model. https://t.co/jAYFQ1bEXk | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1271395466647793666 2020-06-12 03:54:35 -0700 <MeetDotOne> EIP-1559 will be the most expected solution to reduce high #Gas charged cases. #Ethereum #ETH | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1271397475409068033 2020-06-12 04:02:34 -0700 <PumpMoonshot> EIP 1559 Aims to Solve Issue of Ethereum Txns with High ETH Fees - https://t.co/1IQs62xSgK Quick take: Earlier this week, an Ethereum transaction with a $2.6M fee shocked the crypto community.A ... | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1271417248545202176 2020-06-12 05:21:08 -0700 <stonecoldpat0> @dankrad @VitalikButerin @ArthurB @hasufl but there is no guarantee that it is a distribution of feecaps? i'm keeping the example simple to illustrate that EIP-1559 is potentially as mechanism to force miners to process urgent transactions first. | 2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1271422356163047425 2020-06-12 05:41:26 -0700 <stonecoldpat0> @dankrad @VitalikButerin @ArthurB @hasufl base fee* and the proposal in EIP-1559 is just to temporarily increase the networks capacity to compute that base fee. when the max bid ceiling is hit, we just constrain back to the average block size, and then go about clearing the backlog, regardless of its size | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1271423422355169281 2020-06-12 05:45:40 -0700 <stonecoldpat0> @dankrad @VitalikButerin @ArthurB @hasufl I ask that question because one criticism of EIP-1559 is that if you can increase the block size to 20m, why not just do that all the time? Arthurs original point. Its only purpose is to compute the base fee in a way that exploits the mistrust amongst miners. Might be other way | 2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1271424111005270019 2020-06-12 05:48:24 -0700 <stonecoldpat0> @dankrad @VitalikButerin @ArthurB @hasufl At first I thought the intended purpose of EIP-1559 was to optimise for clearing the back log, but it doesn't do that for black thursday - which i think a lot of supports of EIP-1559 believe. just seems wasteful if you can support 15m gas blocks, could just do that all the time | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1271429908108128258 2020-06-12 06:11:26 -0700 <dankrad> @paddypisa @VitalikButerin @ArthurB @hasufl Of course, we can always debate changing the average from 10m to 15m. I'm actually for that. But that's a different and literally completely orthogonal debate, please don't dilute the EIP1559 debate with it. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1271431854751494144 2020-06-12 06:19:10 -0700 <CPOfficialtx> EIP 1559 will fix high Ethereum transaction fee issues, says Buterin - https://t.co/CaR5yFwlow https://t.co/GI93QWs6cn | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1271437053587267585 2020-06-12 06:39:50 -0700 <ArthurB> @dankrad @hasufl I agree that you need at least *some* breathing room and that in principle you can consume that breathing room once in a while without adverse consequences. I don't think that wiggle room is particularly meaningful the elasticity sought by EIP 1559 goes far beyond that. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1271442741763821578 2020-06-12 07:02:26 -0700 <bitlyfool> EIP 1559 will fix high Ethereum transaction fee issues, says Buterin - https://t.co/qRy6CijE8l https://t.co/wd9BkD5HK4 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1271448733876654080 2020-06-12 07:26:15 -0700 <TimBeiko> .@JHancock says the network has been very helpful to drive development discussion and we should do more of them! Again, I agree! I added that I think we should do something similar for EIP-1559. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1271449808201449472 2020-06-12 07:30:31 -0700 <TimBeiko> We had a quick update on EIP-1559: @hudsonjameson said that there was a call to see more formal analysis of it, beyond the modelling currently being done (see this thread: https://t.co/JKTfL7oLbA). If you can help with this, please reach out to me 😄! | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1271460131188944898 2020-06-12 08:11:32 -0700 <SDLerner> @dankrad @paddypisa @VitalikButerin @ArthurB @hasufl Any deviation is public. Any attack requires collusion. When we launched RSK, we decided to keep it simple until a better mechanism was found (if ever). If EIP-1559 turns out to do better, we will propose to add the consensus rule. But I don't think it's better. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1271461730992914433 2020-06-12 08:17:53 -0700 <stonecoldpat0> @dankrad @SDLerner @VitalikButerin @ArthurB @hasufl i mean today, not in EIP-1559 | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1271462110367756291 2020-06-12 08:19:24 -0700 <dankrad> @paddypisa @SDLerner @VitalikButerin @ArthurB @hasufl Isn't this whole argument comparing EIP1559 to their mechanism? | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1271462942907740161 2020-06-12 08:22:42 -0700 <dankrad> @paddypisa @SDLerner @VitalikButerin @ArthurB @hasufl I understand that, but @SDLerner was arguing that his mechanism is superior to EIP1559. I argue that it's not! It's not incentive compatible. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1271464513745887232 2020-06-12 08:28:57 -0700 <stonecoldpat0> @SDLerner @dankrad @VitalikButerin @ArthurB @hasufl thats basically what EIP-1559 is doing in a round-about-way. (not percentage, but it eats into their profit as basefee increases) | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1271464693601906689 2020-06-12 08:29:40 -0700 <stonecoldpat0> @dankrad @SDLerner @VitalikButerin @ArthurB @hasufl i dunno. it just seems like he argued it was an ok solution since they assume honest majority. that is assumed in ethereum right now as well. if it was abused, he could find some solutions around that like EIP-1559. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1271469389964095494 2020-06-12 08:48:19 -0700 <dankrad> @paddypisa @SDLerner @VitalikButerin @ArthurB @hasufl Umm, yes. That is exactly why EIP1559 is designed to be incentive compatible. | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1271481806148317184 2020-06-12 09:37:40 -0700 <joncursi> @RydesaurusRex Yeah, I think you may be right on both points. However, I’m excited for EIP 1559 to land at some point, which would convert #DeFi economic activity directly into $ETH value accrual via tx fee burning. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1271482220864319489 2020-06-12 09:39:19 -0700 <joncursi> Does anyone know when EIP 1559 will launch (months, years)? Is #ETH2 a prerequisite, or will EIP 1559 land on #ETH1 in the interim? 🧐 @BanklessHQ @RyanSAdams @TrustlessState @sassal0x @econoar | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1271484190844911625 2020-06-12 09:47:08 -0700 <PaulESamson> EIP 1559 will fix high #Ethereum transaction fee issues, says Buterin - #Ethereum20 #EthereumNews #EthereumPrice - https://t.co/2VAI83NI4H | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1271526817715769344 2020-06-12 12:36:31 -0700 <AFDudley0> As an author of EIP-1559, I think this does a better of job explaining EIP-1559 than EIP-1559 and all previous documentation of it does. It's short too. | 3 replies 15 retweets 101 likes | |
| 1271574435242356739 2020-06-12 15:45:44 -0700 <antiprosynth> @RydesaurusRex @gavinandresen Yes, but my concern is whether that also leads to ETH value accrual, which is crucial for Ethereum to succeed. EIP 1559 could be the missing link here. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1271627152996384768 2020-06-12 19:15:13 -0700 <johnmorganFL> EIP 1559 will fix high #Ethereum transaction fee issues, says Buterin https://t.co/a6p90YmtXW https://t.co/WdHoOJTLi0 | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1271640945407127558 2020-06-12 20:10:01 -0700 <CryptoTraderPro> 📽️ Crypt0: Craig Wright Was The Mt. Gox HACKER?! | EIP-1559 Is About To CHANGE THE GAME, On Ethereum | 4K NEWS! https://t.co/ZLZPc5UJjD via ⟶ https://t.co/3N04RxOtvM | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1271677445276495879 2020-06-12 22:35:04 -0700 <cryptor_net> Тайна трех транзакций и EIP 1559 https://t.co/Jih1Ez0FpR https://t.co/4J7eTCzURr | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1271685077471301632 2020-06-12 23:05:23 -0700 <btcnewsapp> Craig Wright Was The Mt. Gox HACKER?! | EIP-1559 Is About To CHANGE THE GAME, On Ethereum | 4K NEWS! - Crypt0 TV via BTCnews for iOS https://t.co/FOehylQ1cI | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1271757352484638720 2020-06-13 03:52:35 -0700 <practicaleric> Craig Wright Was The Mt. Gox HACKER?! | EIP-1559 Is About To CHANGE THE ... https://t.co/LwHq2urjVf via @YouTube | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1271780356669276160 2020-06-13 05:24:00 -0700 <ETHPlanet> Analysis of EIP-1559 | EIP-1559:以太坊费用市场的最大变革 @hasufl & @gakonst "EIP-1559 将会带来任何主要区块链网络中用户竞价区块空间方式的最大改变。虽然此提案的规则相对简单，但它将对用户、矿工和钱包提供商将带来重大的变化...” via @UnitimesHQ Full analysis https://t.co/ZZz1eJYlmZ https://t.co/lv5CJ1XBy8 | 0 replies 1 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1271783491055861767 2020-06-13 05:36:27 -0700 <CryptoElGato> Craig Wright Was The Mt. Gox HACKER?! | EIP-1559 Is About To CHANGE THE ... https://t.co/zWZmL4dTNv via @YouTube #bitcoin #crypto | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1271813107673903104 2020-06-13 07:34:08 -0700 <on_ethereum> Analysis of EIP-1559 – Deribit Insights https://t.co/Emvfb3LzvT via @on_ethereum | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1271833637466583040 2020-06-13 08:55:43 -0700 <justanothernod3> @ColeGotTweets @DeFiDaJo EIP 1559? | 0 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1271878157151461376 2020-06-13 11:52:37 -0700 <Crypto_n_derivs> @hasufl @gakonst @DeribitInsights @hasufl great article, 1 question: "miner can also be paid indirectly via MEV. For example, a miner could include a DEX transaction without any fees because he could make money elsewhere by front-running it EIP1559 largely fixes this problem" Does EIP help against frontrunning? | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1271879029742854155 2020-06-13 11:56:05 -0700 <Crypto_n_derivs> @hasufl @gakonst @DeribitInsights I understand that front-running, forks and re-arranging the transactions are incentivised by high fees and/or miner extracted value. Both will be possible and likely almost as common with EIP1559 Does more stable fee market help reduce the burden of these attacks? | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1271896359004708864 2020-06-13 13:04:57 -0700 <austerity_sucks> @iam_gls @ColeGotTweets because of ETH2.0 which ends mining and goes to PoS (with as low as 1.8% reward annually) and EIP 1559 which burns all fees paid on the network. if total fees per year are greater than the 1.8% then it deflates because burning more than printing | 2 replies 2 retweets 27 likes | |
| 1271898001401937921 2020-06-13 13:11:28 -0700 <whalepool> EIP 1559 on Ethereum shows that ETH community, like @justinsuntron & Tron, are really only interested in pumping their token Burning fees rather than disbursing to stakers in ETH2.0 is a desperate attempt to have a deflationary token, contradicting the "gas for dapps" narrative | 5 replies 3 retweets 12 likes | |
| 1271902205101125638 2020-06-13 13:28:11 -0700 <cryptow1re> #ethtrader 🤖: Craig Wright Was The Mt. Gox HACKER?! | EIP-1559 Is About To CHANGE THE GAME, On Ethereum | 4K NEWS! https://t.co/nLEnqSTKsd | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1271902298113839104 2020-06-13 13:28:33 -0700 <TokenJay> Craig Wright Was The Mt. Gox HACKER?! | EIP-1559 Is About To CHANGE THE GAME, On Ethereum | 4K NEWS! https://t.co/TKT0PqKCbX #CryptoCurrency (from Reddit) https://t.co/51PSDwvAqg | 0 replies 1 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1271902430905671682 2020-06-13 13:29:04 -0700 <cryptow1re> reddit 🤖: Craig Wright Was The Mt. Gox HACKER?! | EIP-1559 Is About To CHANGE THE GAME, On Ethereum | 4K NEWS! https://t.co/QEfkwr0gJg | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1271903553838145536 2020-06-13 13:33:32 -0700 <acoindetective> Craig Wright Was The Mt. Gox HACKER?! | EIP-1559 Is About To CHANGE THE GAME, On Ethereum | 4K NEWS! $ETH $GAME https://t.co/Cn4RozBYDY | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1271913759125073920 2020-06-13 14:14:05 -0700 <CryptoTraderPro> Craig Wright Was The Mt. Gox HACKER?! | EIP-1559 Is About To CHANGE THE GAME, On Ethereum | 4K NEWS! https://t.co/19YwGOMwKU ⟶ via https://t.co/Ko6HQzkpz1 https://t.co/vJWDkhGuEG | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1271918800414351362 2020-06-13 14:34:07 -0700 <CryptoCurrNews> [NEW] Craig Wright Was The Mt. Gox HACKER?! | EIP-1559 Is About To CHANGE THE GAME, On Ethereum | 4K NEWS! + https://t.co/QbBrYlSbV2 #bitcoin #btc #cryptocurrency #crypto #blockchain | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1272144175836905473 2020-06-14 05:29:41 -0700 <TalBeerySec> @VitalikButerin @el33th4xor @ittayeyal @drakefjustin @dankrad If we already suggesting a change to fee model (#EIP1559), maybe include some sort of a cap on fees to prevent such attacks and mistakes? https://t.co/8gVRz2kRjR | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1272145106305462273 2020-06-14 05:33:23 -0700 <SpaceCowboy0x> @twobitidiot @cburniske I think enterprise adoption and any big news around CBDCs could give it some big volume. Couple that with Eth 2.0 and EIP 1559 and you got some good stuff going on. That being said, $7,500 Eth just seems high to me. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1272157991463256065 2020-06-14 06:24:35 -0700 <dankrad> @TalBeerySec @GuthL @VitalikButerin @el33th4xor @ittayeyal @drakefjustin I think to a large extent, this will already happen with EIP1559. The only additional thing you could do would be to cap the tip. But I'd argue it would already be less of a problem because the requirement to change defaults to get transactions in would mostly disappear. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1272164606715322380 2020-06-14 06:50:52 -0700 <TalBeerySec> @dankrad @GuthL @VitalikButerin @el33th4xor @ittayeyal @drakefjustin I am not an expert on EIP1559, but attackers are still technically capable of maliciously changing the defaults and sending a huge tip (or by mistake), right? Why not consider capping the tip? | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1272165852310310912 2020-06-14 06:55:49 -0700 <dankrad> @TalBeerySec @GuthL @VitalikButerin @el33th4xor @ittayeyal @drakefjustin The question is why the attacker is even able to "set" a gas price. I assume that right now, many systems would need this ability in order to guarantee getting transactions in. In EIP1559, you can build such a system without allowing manipulation of the tip. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1272176041226915840 2020-06-14 07:36:18 -0700 <Stealthcrypted> @twobitidiot @cburniske You don't need to replicate ico bubble .. ico bubble: inflationary game Eth 2.0 pos/staking DeFi value capture (eth locked) eip1559: deflationary game. New ath vs btc very unlikely anyway | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1272179374503202816 2020-06-14 07:49:33 -0700 <dankrad> @aliatiia_ Sure. BTW, I fear a gas token isn't actually feasible. I think to actually make it work you will need gas futures. Since a gas token cannot represent that demand at certain times may simply exceed supply. Also you need an EIP1559 like mechanism as a gas price oracle. | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1272183569889320961 2020-06-14 08:06:13 -0700 <aliatiia_> @dankrad (I'll start calling it fETH instead of GAS) > demand [..] may simply exceed supply Ya the assumptions is that incentives make fETH:ETH AMM market v deep > need an EIP1559 like mechanism Yes, if tx consumes 21k gas then (1) 21k fETH must be burnt (2) extra tip goes to miner | 2 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1272190073493209088 2020-06-14 08:32:04 -0700 <LeUnderground> @udiWertheimer @ColeGotTweets "EIP 1559, eth 2 staking, layer 2 will reduce Eth production drastically" Meanwhile, in the real world: heh ETH miner goes brrrr | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1272201013718659072 2020-06-14 09:15:32 -0700 <aliatiia_> @dankrad So _protocol_ says "ok, your tx consumes 21k gas, you must give me 21k fETHs and i'll burn it". This is the bus ticket. And the _miner_ says "What's in it for ME? ".So u say "here is a bribe, a bag of fETH, let me cut in line". The bribe is the `GAS_PREMIUM` or 'tip' in EIP1559. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1272201172368142338 2020-06-14 09:16:10 -0700 <shanghaipreneur> @LeoMorozovskii @stevenmcclurg @LeahWald Here is my more general rebuttal about what @beexponential got wrong. 1. They completely whiff on ETH2 2. They don't even mention #DeFi 3. It appears they did not research EIP-1559 Read more on #HIVE's @FinanceLeo https://t.co/IooHDNkrGV | 0 replies 2 retweets 6 likes | |
| 1272232822196051969 2020-06-14 11:21:56 -0700 <ian_keane> @FintechJero When EIP1559 is implemented it will be hyper deflationary. Very few understand this. | 1 replies 0 retweets 11 likes | |
| 1272290512817528833 2020-06-14 15:11:10 -0700 <cburniske> @RydesaurusRex @devilninja777 @FairmintCO Both. Value is stored in the tokens, but that value accrues to ETH over time as the tokens rely on ETH 4 operations. Some tokens will require ETH for formation (ICOs, STOs, DAI, etc, this trend isn’t going away) and all token operations on Ethereum will *burn ETH* per EIP 1559. | 0 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1272406952455397377 2020-06-14 22:53:52 -0700 <MapleLeafCap> @mewn21 Ha ETH for sure. I really like EIP1559 as it basically turns a water-like recyclable resource into oil. BTC has long term problems RE: network security but the world needs a strong-network-effect digital gold — and it serves as a very elegant solution for now. | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1272433396699062273 2020-06-15 00:38:57 -0700 <bneiluj> Impressive post about Analysis of EIP-1559 by @DeribitExchange. Having one of the most advanced crypto derivatives trading platform talking about Ethereum & making great research posts is pretty bullish about $ETH. They've also shared EIP1559 Simulations https://t.co/ezSz2O0Gt5 https://t.co/I2LAO1AnK5 | 2 replies 5 retweets 21 likes | |
| 1272455010039848960 2020-06-15 02:04:50 -0700 <ColdDevil> @hackernoon @pauliusuza @pauliusuza I'm wondering how or if EIP 1559 was considered while designing this project? Shouldn't this completely address the fee issues? This is the EIP: https://t.co/MgmreVsOyL and here is a nice writeup by @TrustlessState https://t.co/KHagZJwiiG @VitalikButerin @econoar | 2 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1272458434839969792 2020-06-15 02:18:26 -0700 <anod1> @hasufl @gakonst Thanks for this analysis. is EIP-1559 only for POW chain like ETH1, or also for POS chain like ETH2 ? | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1272463103100321792 2020-06-15 02:36:59 -0700 <Pickle_cRypto> @WhalePanda You’re a hypocrite. #bitcoin tech is not unique or the best but it has the mindshare and network effects to stay on top. The same applies to $eth relative to other smart contract platforms. Also look into the economics of eip1559 and staking AND defi. $Eth will be scarce. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1272483392051990529 2020-06-15 03:57:36 -0700 <pauliusuza> @ColdDevil @hackernoon @TrustlessState @VitalikButerin @econoar We are closely monitoring all developments related to fees in Ethereum ecosystem. While EIP1559 can theoretically address the some of the issues on the protocol level, we have built something you can readily use today. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1272534442792419328 2020-06-15 07:20:28 -0700 <TimBeiko> Next EIP-1559 Implementers' call has been scheduled 📅 My goals for the call are to (hopefully 😅) get to a decision about how we bundle/don't bundle 1559 & escalator fees, and get agreement on a plan for testing/analyzing the change. The call will be streamed 📺🎉! https://t.co/Ku2zQ6391y | 3 replies 20 retweets 41 likes | |
| 1272545620549607424 2020-06-15 08:04:53 -0700 <avsa> Will EIP1559 actually improve the UX? In theory users would only need to put a predictable fee burn, and only add a tip as an option. But if miners have no incentive to add low tip transactions and fill the block, then we would be back at what we are at the moment. | 2 replies 1 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1272549902103523329 2020-06-15 08:21:54 -0700 <VitalikButerin> @avsa @hasufl Because in the current case tx inclusion is primarily restricted by the gasprice cap, so it actually behaves like an auction, whereas in EIP 1559 miners can include a variable number of transactions. | 0 replies 0 retweets 13 likes | |
| 1272554898807291905 2020-06-15 08:41:45 -0700 <nat__top> In the midst of overwhelming love for EIP-1559 (@econoar), finally someone is questioning what is ACTUALLY innovative in it. I also didn’t get much excited tbh... see how things unfold 🤔 | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1272581870778277891 2020-06-15 10:28:56 -0700 <Chris2pherChase> “Ether is not an investment... it’s digital tungsten”🤦🏼♂️ Imagine running a crypto fund and ignoring all reality $ETH has more -Devs -Use cases -Transactions -ROI (since inception/YTD) -EIP1559 (less inflation) Same people called for 3 digit $BTC in 2018 https://t.co/kPKMjSP6qF | 0 replies 4 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1272622844887945217 2020-06-15 13:11:45 -0700 <evan_van_ness> #MostClicked * @hasufl @gakonst EIP1559 analysis * @IvanOnTech eth2 explainer * @ZenGo TX Pool analyzer * @LimeChainHQ Baseline Protocol explainer * @quickblocks how accurate is @etherscan? * @ofnumbers lingering crypto controversies * @the_matter_labs layer2 evaluation chart | 0 replies 7 retweets 22 likes | |
| 1272672888907157505 2020-06-15 16:30:36 -0700 <econoar> We're going live in 15 minutes for the EthHub Weekly Recap. Topics: -New @gitcoin grants round -@prylabs Onyx testnet -@StarkWareLtd introduces Volition for scaling -@coinbase explores adding more assets -DeFi token value growth -EIP-1559 analysis from @hasufl and @gakonst | 1 replies 7 retweets 30 likes | |
| 1272792615943933963 2020-06-16 00:26:21 -0700 <mbenothman> @CarpeNoctom Thanks, Josh. Fyi, a couple typos: "Phase zero of the herculean task could launch as early as January 2020" and "because ETH 2.0 was ready for deployment, the Ice Age was pushed back". I also rec you add info on EIP 1559 as it's a material change with significant support. | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1272848581481975808 2020-06-16 04:08:44 -0700 <hasufl> In Episode 2 of the Uncommon Core podcast, @zhusu and I talked about the blockspace market. Topics include - what EIP-1559 is and the problems it solves - first-price auctions vs fixed-price sale - EIP-1559 as an oracle for chain congestion https://t.co/BoL8oXRKbB | 2 replies 16 retweets 52 likes | |
| 1272849177601552385 2020-06-16 04:11:06 -0700 <hasufl> Highly recommend this as a companion to the analysis we published on EIP-1559 last week https://t.co/YJOwcXe3DA | 0 replies 1 retweets 10 likes | |
| 1272857248251944961 2020-06-16 04:43:11 -0700 <antiprosynth> @69SmellMyFinger @DaoChemist @ChrisBlec @renprotocol Yes, it does. And a high ETH price is needed: - ETH is the only truly trustless collateral on Ethereum - ETH's market cap puts a cap on the effective value that can be securely settled/stored on Ethereum - EIP 1559 will explicitly accrue value to ETH through usage by fee burning. | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1272905880707764224 2020-06-16 07:56:26 -0700 <Ethlong1> 6d. Upgrading of EVM to eWASM, the engine under-the-hood, to allow greater development outside of Solidity langauge amongst other things 6e. EIP-1559. Whilst not part of the new upgrade, EIP-1559, if implemented will burn fees, thereby limiting future #ETH supply | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1272913275815186432 2020-06-16 08:25:49 -0700 <cryptow1re> reddit 🤖: The 1.x Files: EIP 1559 and the Ethereum Improvement Horizon https://t.co/5607jTEI0n | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1272913467142402049 2020-06-16 08:26:34 -0700 <TokenJay> The 1.x Files: EIP 1559 and the Ethereum Improvement Horizon https://t.co/PjUXTT7Ugk #CryptoCurrency (from Reddit) https://t.co/FtoXesyemr | 0 replies 1 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1272913519688577024 2020-06-16 08:26:47 -0700 <gichiba> EIP 1559 / Escalator: The future of Ethereum is all shiny and chrome https://t.co/IpLTP0fyzH | 12 replies 40 retweets 116 likes | |
| 1272913548868452352 2020-06-16 08:26:54 -0700 <McWhaleMc> "The 1.x Files: EIP 1559 and the Ethereum Improvement Horizon" https://t.co/uGh6uuBvBS | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1272914628503371776 2020-06-16 08:31:11 -0700 <CHalexov2016> The 1.x Files: EIP 1559 and the Ethereum Improvement Horizon | Ethereum Foundation Blog https://t.co/R1VhP0cQIs | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1272914961120079874 2020-06-16 08:32:31 -0700 <DatasesCrypto> The 1.x Files: EIP 1559 and the Ethereum Improvement Horizon https://t.co/BjPa1rDYNT | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1272915155869982725 2020-06-16 08:33:17 -0700 <TobbyKitty> EIP 1559 Can simidimiz.. | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1272915366016987137 2020-06-16 08:34:07 -0700 <acoindetective> The 1.x Files: EIP 1559 and the Ethereum Improvement Horizon $ETH https://t.co/7Wj0FOVm6J | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1272915723510329344 2020-06-16 08:35:32 -0700 <on_ethereum> The 1.x Files: EIP 1559 and the Ethereum Improvement Horizon via @on_ethereum | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1272915913214435329 2020-06-16 08:36:18 -0700 <tron_age> The 1.x Files: EIP 1559 and the Ethereum Improvement Horizon #blockchain #dlike #cryptocurrency https://t.co/k6YIBEwFab | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1272916135395155971 2020-06-16 08:37:10 -0700 <veliko_test3> The 1.x Files: EIP 1559 and the Ethereum Improvement Horizon https://t.co/zBc5TG1lg2 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1272920712106385408 2020-06-16 08:55:22 -0700 <moon30011986> ethereumRT gichiba: EIP 1559 / Escalator: The future of Ethereum is all shiny and chrome https://t.co/cDm3gNtVFw https://t.co/CCltZDErh9 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1272920967816208385 2020-06-16 08:56:23 -0700 <0xTycoon> @gichiba @sassal0x Escalator is a nice idea, much more simple, which is good - but does address the economic abstraction problem? That would probably be a higher priority for some, and it's kinda awesome how EIP 1559 solves both gas predictability & economic abstraction in one. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1272921176608833537 2020-06-16 08:57:12 -0700 <r_Ethereum> The 1.x Files: EIP 1559 and the Ethereum Improvement Horizon #Ethereum https://t.co/qTOIu3vx7X | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1272924661484081158 2020-06-16 09:11:03 -0700 <fortivus> EIP 1559 and the Ethereum Improvement Horizon #Ethereum via https://t.co/V7FfW08zbr https://t.co/0PhRxU1jdX | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1272940938415927297 2020-06-16 10:15:44 -0700 <econoar> EthHub Weekly #118 -New @gitcoin grants round -@prylabs Onyx testnet -@StarkWareLtd introduces Volition for scaling -@coinbase explores adding more assets -DeFi token value growth -EIP-1559 analysis from @hasufl and @gakonst https://t.co/Q8QkrwA4Or | 0 replies 10 retweets 36 likes | |
| 1272941562532712448 2020-06-16 10:18:13 -0700 <hudsonjameson> Check out the new @EthCatHerders Gitcoin grant! The Cat Herders provide bounties for note taking at major Ethereum ecosystem meetings including the Core Developer Meetings and the Eth 2.0 meetings, in addition to other endeavors like organizing a design competition for EIP-1559. | 3 replies 10 retweets 27 likes | |
| 1272944156483166211 2020-06-16 10:28:31 -0700 <RyanSAdams> GET HYPE! @hasufl's coming on @BanklessHQ tomorrow. Episode release next Monday. We'll talk EIP1559, crypto banks, Maker...and most importantly...we'll find out his favorite Rick & Morty episode | 2 replies 10 retweets 51 likes | |
| 1272944570687533059 2020-06-16 10:30:10 -0700 <quasagroup> EIP 1559 and the Ethereum Improvement Horizon #Ethereum via https://t.co/arGOrXVlVe https://t.co/yUtWF3U3VA | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1272946079613554688 2020-06-16 10:36:10 -0700 <dragontoad7th> EIP 1559 and the Ethereum Improvement Horizon #Ethereum via https://t.co/IFbhiOSQAe https://t.co/sSnitERa71 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1272946325085138944 2020-06-16 10:37:08 -0700 <veliko_test3> EthHub Weekly #118: Gitcoin Grants matching live, PryLabs Onyx eth2 testnet, StarkWare introduces Volition, Coinbase explores new assets, DeFi tokens are hot and a great analysis of EIP-1559 https://t.co/JLRbxOZuqF | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1272949947520835585 2020-06-16 10:51:32 -0700 <freegold> @hudsonjameson @EthCatHerders Hudson, can you please put the http for the EIP-1559 in your explanation so others can look it up easily. thanks | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1272950113808166913 2020-06-16 10:52:12 -0700 <lastmjs> @bradmillscan @taha_zafar12 @cburniske 1/ It should also get better with EIP 1559 or other proposals (at least 1 other that I know of) aimed at improving the block fee market. Also, it's not just singular transaction fees that are important to look at, I'd say more important is aggregate fees | 1 replies 0 retweets 7 likes | |
| 1272951889575972865 2020-06-16 10:59:15 -0700 <hudsonjameson> Fresh EIP-1559 explanation: https://t.co/59G7j1T4Fm | 0 replies 2 retweets 12 likes | |
| 1272954550060814337 2020-06-16 11:09:49 -0700 <Ethlong1> 16. Within the next 2 years Ethereum’s inflation will fall below Bitcoin’s. With the implementation of EIP-1559, staking POS and #ETH being locked up in #Defi, etc, #ETH’s supply shock with force higher prices | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1272982970274627585 2020-06-16 13:02:45 -0700 <NathanMontone> EIP-1559 analysis https://t.co/HpC2B8qIJ0 @ethereum $EST | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1272989808370081793 2020-06-16 13:29:55 -0700 <dmihal> @harry_sudock @VitalikButerin @ck_SNARKs @phil_geiger @LastCoinStandng Issuance will depend on the amount of ETH staked, but will likely be less than 1%. When EIP-1559 is implemented, issuance may be less than the amount of ETH burned, making issuance effectively negative. https://t.co/5LN11RJqhk | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1273135037635088386 2020-06-16 23:07:01 -0700 <IdeltoInfo> "The 1.x Files: EIP 1559 and the Ethereum Improvement Horizon" I’ve been thinking recently about post-apocalyptic wastelands. Specifically, about this scene from Mad Max: Fury Road, when the main c... (Idelto - https://t.co/j4IyaXO2zv) | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1273140476611375104 2020-06-16 23:28:38 -0700 <AlexMasmej> @danfinlay @palebluethdot @onewayfunction @Alexintosh Nice! But I hope this is temporary. Your EIP-1559 Figma design are great btw, and that, L2 and PoS should solve this problem | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1273142219084574729 2020-06-16 23:35:33 -0700 <AlexMasmej> @danfinlay @palebluethdot @onewayfunction @Alexintosh Oh ok. Actually EIP1559 will have predictable pricing right? So yeah that makes no sense. I thought I saw it from you though | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1273177301723893763 2020-06-17 01:54:57 -0700 <Dalwitter_> @nzlconcerto @notquitemaximal @k33ple4rn1ng @intocryptoverse Eip1559 | 2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1273178151665963010 2020-06-17 01:58:20 -0700 <dimahledba> @peter_szilagyi @Gary_Rong @etherchain_org I guess this protection will be removed when EIP-1559 will get included in a network upgrade. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1273211968887779329 2020-06-17 04:12:43 -0700 <UnitimesHQ> ✍️ The 1.x Files: #EIP1559 and the #Ethereum Improvement Horizon https://t.co/5Ov3bNqSQw ✍️ Chinese version >>「 Eth1.x 档案：EIP-1559 和 #以太坊 的改进之路」at https://t.co/L5tJGKAQIz >> https://t.co/lPjVvCvs7c @ethereum | 0 replies 2 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1273224633559343105 2020-06-17 05:03:02 -0700 <PJusername> @BTCMarkets I can't wait to see the scaling benefits. The world is ripe for such a solution, scaling ETH will really bring it home. EIP 1559 will also harden ETH as a money. So much to look forward to! | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1273224644074618882 2020-06-17 05:03:05 -0700 <LUKACACIC> @VitalikButerin EIP 1559 🙌 | 1 replies 1 retweets 29 likes | |
| 1273225958611472387 2020-06-17 05:08:18 -0700 <sniko_> @opinderpreet @realmubaris @VitalikButerin EIP 1559 promotes a base fee burn https://t.co/wCEXemgjIg https://t.co/xFk0HkNDVH | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1273233256834461697 2020-06-17 05:37:18 -0700 <desh_saurabh> https://t.co/YJvrmVOten This is the best analysis available for EIP-1559 by @hasufl and @gakonst Do you think that it perpetual subsidy of some sort is something bitcoin can also evaluate as a sustainable security model? | 2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes | |
| 1273245108973047808 2020-06-17 06:24:24 -0700 <FroggyFrogster> @btcmvmnt @OracularTitanes @realmubaris @VitalikButerin If you think that a supply cap represents the best monetary policy known to man, that's a very simple view of money. What can beat it? Ether, once Ethereum 2.0 and EIP-1559 are implemented. If you have an open mind, I encourage you to read this: https://t.co/U13JEg1WPo | 1 replies 1 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1273274857082351618 2020-06-17 08:22:36 -0700 <lastmjs> Ethereum's issuance for ETH has only gone down over time, starting at 5 ETH per block -> 3 ETH per block -> currently 2 ETH per block. From what I'm hearing the issuance will continue to drop as EIP1559/Escalator are implemented, and as we move to proof of stake | 0 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1273279327296270336 2020-06-17 08:40:22 -0700 <DaxTaran> @RedFromThe6 @JustinBennettFX @APompliano Ether (ETH) is the native/reserve currency of the Ethereum economy. Every action on the network requires Ether to be used, and in Eth2 (more specifically EIP1559), part of the transaction fee is burned, adding deflation to the ETH supply. https://t.co/Uq3L3R9r7E | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1273283451391750148 2020-06-17 08:56:45 -0700 <hasufl> @fnietom can you give me a concrete example where someone would pay fees out-of-band in Ethereum with EIP-1559? I have a feeling you misunderstand how it works | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1273297316297035777 2020-06-17 09:51:51 -0700 <CrespusMaximus> @VitalikButerin I whole heartedly agree. Stablecoins have helped smooth Volatility 1)In terms of securing ETH as a network,do u still see ETH being more valuable in USDas time passes(providing EIP1559, and 2.0) go thru?If stable coin adoption continues, this'll help eth become more scarce right? | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1273299340782690312 2020-06-17 09:59:54 -0700 <fnietom> @hasufl In the case of EIP-1559 burning fees doesn't create an incentive for out-of-band fee payments (in other cases it does), but it would destroy value by forcing some users to subsidize others' transactions. Did you read the linked thread? https://t.co/9EVBRD7SQD | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1273361018849280001 2020-06-17 14:04:59 -0700 <ColeGotTweets> I expect the market cap of $ETH to exceed $1 trillion in the coming years due to three primary drivers. - ETH locked in DeFi - Staking / ETH 2.0 - EIP-1559 $10k / ETH is starting to feel like a conservative price target. | 12 replies 39 retweets 197 likes | |
| 1273439568562446339 2020-06-17 19:17:07 -0700 <Talenter_io> EIP 1559 and the Ethereum Improvement Horizon #Ethereum via https://t.co/WNXsdqRBFm https://t.co/TDZOYsQ6D1 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1273444751761502208 2020-06-17 19:37:42 -0700 <shingen_crypto> 今後のETHインフレ率に関する話はこのスレを見ておけば大体把握出来るかと。 これはあくまでも検討中の計画だけど、こうした様な計画に沿って進められていくだろう。 逆に言えば”将来的なETHインフレ率”についてEIP1559を考慮しないで語る内容は考慮に値しない https://t.co/h8GDo3elXw | 0 replies 1 retweets 19 likes | |
| 1273568880116609026 2020-06-18 03:50:57 -0700 <Lanfra68> @mr_ligi From a liquidity perspective the migration to PoS also bound to EIP-1559 (fee burn) follows the stubborn pattern to a deflation. Eth will become a reserve of value just as btc is. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1273575731415650304 2020-06-18 04:18:10 -0700 <Lanfra68> @antiprosynth Proven by EIP-1559 where "network security" is never mentioned except in footnotes where the concern issues have been raised. | 2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1273584682073014273 2020-06-18 04:53:44 -0700 <Chloethedev> @Lanfra68 @antiprosynth Network security with minimum issuance is clearly the point of EIP-1559. The network is not secure if it is not efficient. Network security is the point of EVERY EIP... if it wasn't secure it wouldn't get implemented... Why would core devs need to mention something so obvious? | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1273594307384152065 2020-06-18 05:31:59 -0700 <Lanfra68> @MorganTBennett This is very true. But this also implies a crash in price of ETH would require an immediate action to restore a higher issuance. Unless PoS is fully activated EIP-1559 *and* an issuance reduction are too dangerous. Too much dormant hashing power can be revived. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1273600330912223234 2020-06-18 05:55:55 -0700 <iamDCinvestor> @MorganTBennett @VladZamfir I am not against people having a discussion on it- I'm simply highlighting why I think it may not be successful (or necessary from my POV). I'd much rather we keep attention focused on developing EIP-1559 and getting a version if it implemented. | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1273603163304742913 2020-06-18 06:07:11 -0700 <MorganTBennett> @iamDCinvestor @VladZamfir I like EIP-1559 for many reasons. But let's be honest, fee burning will have a very limited effect on inflation for now. An issuance reduction will be much simpler to implement and way more effective. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1273603846888132610 2020-06-18 06:09:54 -0700 <TheEther2077> @owocki @jbrukh We are going to have a leveling up/status symbol that allows users to earn XP for the amount of agrees they receive. For example, if you wrote an excellent argument why EIP 1559 should be implemented and receive many agrees, you will earn Core Dev XP. Business model is seperate | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1273606820456783873 2020-06-18 06:21:43 -0700 <Lanfra68> @iamDCinvestor @VladZamfir We "will" (if ever) see. Don't use past. EIP-1559 is still Draft | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1273618253705703424 2020-06-18 07:07:09 -0700 <edmundedgar> @paddypisa @IAmNickDodson Once you stop PoS it doesn't really matter, since the reward just goes to ETH holders anyhow (albeit provided they stake). And if you do EIP1559 or similar it becomes even less meaningful since total money supply then depends on fees, which are unpredictable. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1273660210637398017 2020-06-18 09:53:52 -0700 <0xEther> @cyber_hokie Definitely. But how are we going to fast track EIP-1559 and the binning of ProgPoW? | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1273814863740121088 2020-06-18 20:08:24 -0700 <joncursi> @RydesaurusRex @coinbase But this concern is offset by EIP1559, where it doesn’t matter *how* ppl get into DeFi... as long as we get them there, value starts to accrue back to $ETH | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1273846441199329280 2020-06-18 22:13:53 -0700 <DeFi_Dad> @intocryptoast @UniswapProtocol Agreed. We need EIP1559 please. | 0 replies 0 retweets 9 likes | |
| 1273851721358311425 2020-06-18 22:34:52 -0700 <econoar> Ethereum users are paying $500,000 a day to use the network, or 2,175 ETH. Annualized that is 793,875 ETH, much of which could be burned if EIP-1559 was in. | 17 replies 57 retweets 262 likes | |
| 1273859284544237568 2020-06-18 23:04:55 -0700 <MorganTBennett> @econoar Eip-1559 would have a very small effect on inflation if implemented today. Correct? | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1273891533473804291 2020-06-19 01:13:03 -0700 <precyz> Word that Ethereum's vastly undervalued is spreading across the web... Think of a barrel full of oil, knocked over--splattering as it spills out. Only takes one match to explode 💣 One spark💥 What's it gonna be? DeFi? Liquidity Mining? Staking? EIP 1559? ETH2.0? 🕚 | 1 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1273899812249878528 2020-06-19 01:45:57 -0700 <austerity_sucks> ETH people are intent on pumping their token by creating deflationary economics I don't understand it fully because it's meant to be a world computer where gas is not prohibitively expensive. EIP1559 is almost purely designed to pump the coin (aside from more efficient fee mkt) | 0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1273918883750129664 2020-06-19 03:01:44 -0700 <CrespusMaximus> @buddhacoiner @iamDCinvestor You're mentioning EIP 1559 this should happen this year. I'm expecting Q3 but rather them get it right than bugs. EIP 1559 will standardize gas fees across the board | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1273922591519105025 2020-06-19 03:16:28 -0700 <yahgwai> Does anyone else see this when they think of EIP 1559? https://t.co/ddbmVldGZw | 2 replies 1 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1273955828966490112 2020-06-19 05:28:33 -0700 <OisinKyne> @snir261a @antiprosynth @iamDCinvestor After EIP1559, WBTC's effect on Eth is to gradually reduce the supply of eth through the burning of tx fees. So I would consider it a positive for Ethereum. | 1 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1273962427508559873 2020-06-19 05:54:46 -0700 <pleyuh> @lemiscate @The3D_ Yes sure, onchain activity somewhat increases demand for ETH but unless EIP-1559 and PoS come online you expect these fees to get dumped eventually. (Santiment reports that ETH miners accumulate right now) Anyway, reading the data ETH doesn't behave like a defi index. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1273964446801592322 2020-06-19 06:02:47 -0700 <Chloethedev> @realLedgerwatch This point is the most important I think. The lower disparity is too great. Obviously ETH 2.0 solves some of these issues, so does EIP-1559, but there seems to be a larger consensus issue here? | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1273968529176485894 2020-06-19 06:19:01 -0700 <pleyuh> @RyanSAdams Supply & demand dynamics ICOs: fueled by ETH DeFi: fueled by stablecoins The current fee mechanism cannot convert on-chain activity into ETH appreciation. The only reasonable argument for an ETH pump right now would involve speculation on phase 0 or EIP-1559. | 1 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1273969610581295104 2020-06-19 06:23:19 -0700 <LiamJanssens> @RyanSAdams eip1559 that's why we need it. ethereum is being used but all the fees are going to miners who just sell it again. once ethereum network burns the fees + has staking that's when ether will shine atm ethereum is booming but in it's current form that doesn't help ether. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1273974999108345856 2020-06-19 06:44:43 -0700 <0xTycoon> @trent_vanepps @peter_szilagyi @gitcoin @VitalikButerin @dankrad Great question, if I may add may input on this too: EIP-1559 proposes to abolish gas limit voting, set a maximum gas limit of 20m, however, the "basefee" will automatically adjust to target 10m | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1273975409999335425 2020-06-19 06:46:21 -0700 <antiprosynth> @Foobazzler ETH has established itself as a crypto blue chip. The only cryptocurrency to ever achieve that after BTC. And there are plenty of theses to support ETH value accrual, especially taking into account the active efforts to optimize it (EIP 1559, PoS, ...). | 0 replies 1 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1273976259974819840 2020-06-19 06:49:44 -0700 <0xTycoon> @trent_vanepps @peter_szilagyi @gitcoin @VitalikButerin @dankrad So yes, there's already at least one proposal to abolish the gas limit voting. And probably would make sense to do so, considering that we are already reaching the theoretical maximum. Another reason for EIP-1559 i guess 😀 | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1273980611821174785 2020-06-19 07:07:01 -0700 <Teutonium> @Foobazzler @antiprosynth EIP1559 supposedly solves this... Usage = ETH burn = less supply + same demand = higher price 🤷♂️ | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1274013221519650818 2020-06-19 09:16:36 -0700 <lastmjs> @CrespusMaximus @buddhacoiner @iamDCinvestor EIP 1559, ETH 2, and rollups should all help with gas | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1274088982897295361 2020-06-19 14:17:39 -0700 <defiprime> When EIP-1559? 🤔 | 5 replies 9 retweets 59 likes | |
| 1274118644864176129 2020-06-19 16:15:31 -0700 <WestCoastWalka> @TrustlessState @CarpeNoctom @ledgerstatus I see this a lot. Folks criticizing Ethereum and defi, but they have little understanding of what’s happening...just like the other day on your podcast you had @Breedlove22 on and he had never heard of EIP 1559 😳... | 2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1274127056746369029 2020-06-19 16:48:57 -0700 <crypt0snews> @ama8999 @econoar Blockchains that rely only on transaction fees for security can run into problems when the block subsidy runs out. EIP-1559 seeks to untangle network security from transaction fees. Transaction fees are burned, & miners are incentivized by a more reliable perpetual block subsidy. | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1274130233105559554 2020-06-19 17:01:34 -0700 <MapleLeafCap> @iam__vance @jdorman81 Wen EIP1559 sir | 2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1274135084619055105 2020-06-19 17:20:51 -0700 <DegenSpartan> @RydesaurusRex @TwoGunFF yes i agree until EIP-1559 or ETH can reclaim back title of premier collateral, i dont actually see ETH benefiting fundamentally outside of exposure and frontrunning bets on EIP-1559 + PoS | 0 replies 0 retweets 6 likes | |
| 1274136590319677442 2020-06-19 17:26:50 -0700 <DegenSpartan> @RydesaurusRex @TwoGunFF i actually think EIP-1559 would be very significant the bullish part about staking isnt doing it directly, but how it gives ETH a latent yield even if you don't plan to stake it yourself https://t.co/qmOl06xzHu | 0 replies 0 retweets 7 likes | |
| 1274145961527275520 2020-06-19 18:04:04 -0700 <DegenSpartan> @TrustlessState imo, it is a trick unless EIP-1559 goes live https://t.co/SGKU6IBvEX | 3 replies 0 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1274147131083780096 2020-06-19 18:08:43 -0700 <Rando144> @jdorman81 @iam__vance @MapleLeafCap But EIP 1559 mr. Jeff | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1274181827624931333 2020-06-19 20:26:35 -0700 <digital_monad> Capped vs. uncapped issuance. As Ethereum and Bitcoin merge, people will question the value of both tokens highlighting this central point. Bitcoin is clear in halving to 0. EIP-1559 is unclear whether ETH will accept cap and burn or continue mining new coins indefinitely. /2 | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1274237371056222208 2020-06-20 00:07:18 -0700 <HashHubResearch> 「Ethereumガスシステムの未来と過去 Etherの資産性への影響」を配信しました。 Ethereumガスシステムの抜本的変更であるEIP1559が議論されていますが、これが導入されるとどのようになるかこれまでのEthereumの手数料形態についても改めて振り返りながら考察をしています。 https://t.co/Po7dVIdqPR https://t.co/f0OnVkOowx | 0 replies 3 retweets 21 likes | |
| 1274238210529509379 2020-06-20 00:10:38 -0700 <cryptofans_news> Проблема масштабируемости Ethereum решена - EIP-1559 https://t.co/BhjC5376LC Это предложение – EIP-1559. Оно обсуждается с апреля 2019 года и потенциально может кардинально изменить то, как работают комиссии на Ethereum. https://t.co/MG8QzxSbbt | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1274264825783218176 2020-06-20 01:56:23 -0700 <jydd93> BTC on Ethereum before EIP 1559 is better for the former than the latter because wrapped assets reduces asset on-exchange supply. Go figure | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1274331790174543873 2020-06-20 06:22:29 -0700 <brisket131> @zhusu @kyled116 even in the midterm the eth not capturing value thesis makes little sense. All value would accrue to defi tokens because of the potentiality of voting to redirect some of the earnings towards the token but somehow eth should not benefit from eip1559 and pos coming on the horizon. | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1274335634421960705 2020-06-20 06:37:45 -0700 <cburniske> @jdorman81 I believe demand for ETH in DeFi (locking it up, pulling it out of the float), is already ~on par with issuance. @RyanSAdams @TrustlessState @ethhub_io may be able to source that stat. PoS + EIP 1559 will make ETH deflationary, while BTC still disinflationary. | 1 replies 5 retweets 28 likes | |
| 1274343340910182401 2020-06-20 07:08:23 -0700 <iamDCinvestor> @therealwhodunit The value capture will eventually come from: 1) Coming retail DeFi hype 2) More use of ETH for speculation, and locking it to use as collateral 3) People buying more ETH for staking, allowing for income while speculating long term 4) If fee burn / EIP-1559 is implemented | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1274365407156039682 2020-06-20 08:36:04 -0700 <defiprime> @TokenArchitect I think this is the best article on EIP1559 https://t.co/nD9KIZA1GI | 0 replies 1 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1274401092663750658 2020-06-20 10:57:52 -0700 <iamDCinvestor> @DefiWoof @compoundfinance Over time, I believe this is quite possible, yes. The ultimate eth2 spec will include fee burning, and it is possible we'll see it implemented on eth1 late 2020 / early 2021 via EIP-1559. It's under review and analysis now. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1274445745916186625 2020-06-20 13:55:18 -0700 <DeFiDaJo> @lawmaster @QWQiao eip-1559 | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1274448381776138243 2020-06-20 14:05:46 -0700 <austerity_sucks> @QWQiao generally agree but don't you think EIP1559 and its agressive adaptations (burning entire tx fee) are just gimmicks to create deflationary economics which go against stated goal of being world computer for dapps? ("useful platform") ? | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1274484652309467136 2020-06-20 16:29:54 -0700 <isidoreducass> @kevinsekniqi @Arthur_0x EIP 1559 and eth 2.0 kido | 0 replies 1 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1274516547684319237 2020-06-20 18:36:38 -0700 <DeFi_Dad> @Christo76279555 @sss4321_s With Eth2 and EIP1559, hoping we get gas fees down in the future. Lotta light at the end of the tunnel. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1274522051764785153 2020-06-20 18:58:31 -0700 <BlockchainedX> EIP-1559 Implementers' Call #3 | https://t.co/LZApEYaK6R https://t.co/jjNUa9fjbd | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1274606666458247169 2020-06-21 00:34:44 -0700 <08xmt> @pleyuh Bearish short term, but bullish long term, especially with eip-1559 on the horizon. | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1274641822472499200 2020-06-21 02:54:26 -0700 <vjsingh102> #Ethereum transaction fees are currently too high for micro transaction executions of high gas using smart contracts. #EIP1559 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1274690368907489281 2020-06-21 06:07:21 -0700 <08xmt> Interesting to see the effect of the bitcoin halving vs. yield farming hype, on the percentage of total block reward paid in fees. I'm looking forward to seeing how EIP-1559 is going to impact this. @TrustlessState @sassal0x @RyanSAdams https://t.co/OO2uyDOj70 | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1274745846618370054 2020-06-21 09:47:48 -0700 <antiprosynth> @RydesaurusRex @g3nology Why are you holding ETH value accrual to such an absurdly high standard compared to pretty much all other assets, to the extent that you think it *needs* explicit mechanism design? EIP 1559 seems awesome, but I have no worry that value accrues to ETH through Ethereum's success. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1274751968574083073 2020-06-21 10:12:07 -0700 <antiprosynth> @RydesaurusRex @g3nology As do I. But many assets out there have far less reason to accrue value than ETH, yet they do. And ETH has firmly established itself as a blue chip crypto asset next to BTC. The fee burning part of EIP 1559 is a very-nice-to-have, not a need-to-have. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1274996075104022537 2020-06-22 02:22:07 -0700 <CHalexov2016> @econoar We need asap eip 1559 | 0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1275002253087133697 2020-06-22 02:46:40 -0700 <Metropolis1987> @antiprosynth @RydesaurusRex @g3nology You do a lot for Eth but you do have this one wrong. As an ETH bagholder the day I see EIP-1559 confirmed in the next upgrade is the day I consolidate even further into Ether. It’s also the day I’ll probably open an Eth/btc long. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1275024287599144961 2020-06-22 04:14:13 -0700 <AlexMasmej> 2017: ICO 2018: “Primitives” stage 2019: ETH is money 2020: Yield Farming The underlying fundamentals of those memes are getting stronger. 👹 For instance, ETH will be much more like money because of improved monetary policy (EIP1559 + PoS) than it was when this meme started. | 1 replies 3 retweets 14 likes | |
| 1275038395652124673 2020-06-22 05:10:17 -0700 <mrjasonchoi> Great piece on EIP1559 by @hasufl. Corollary - some model assets like $MKR by treating burns as dividends. If people model ETH based on value flow from BASEFEE burns (fraction of today's fees at same usage), will that diminish ETH's perceived value? https://t.co/lG30vTiw1Q | 3 replies 2 retweets 22 likes | |
| 1275040368749195264 2020-06-22 05:18:07 -0700 <Rewkang> @mrjasonchoi @richwgalvin @RyanSAdams @nic__carter @SpartanBlack_1 My valuation framework for $ETH (post EIP 1559) is as a commodity asset similar to how oil would be priced. It would be a function of supply & demand. But there are some differences. Production (supply) of oil can increase if price increases, but ETH emissions are constant | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1275041977147547649 2020-06-22 05:24:31 -0700 <RyanSAdams> @mrjasonchoi @richwgalvin @Rewkang @nic__carter @SpartanBlack_1 Ether isn't oil. (Oil is Ethereum blockspace. ) Ether is the petro-dollar. The way to price Ether is as a scarce monetary asset, the same way you'd price Bitcoin. EIP1559 just boosters ETH's scarcity game. | 1 replies 2 retweets 9 likes | |
| 1275087607920160768 2020-06-22 08:25:50 -0700 <SpartanBlack_1> @mrjasonchoi @RyanSAdams @Rewkang @richwgalvin @nic__carter On EIP-1559 specifically, to the extent that fees are burned to reduce ETH supply or inflation, assuming that ETH’s network value rises over time with economic activity, then most of that rise in value gets captured in the price of ETH vs being diluted by more units of ETH. | 0 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1275098187905236994 2020-06-22 09:07:52 -0700 <uriklarman> 2) In fact, usually fees are just 5% of miners revenues, and they don't optimize to increase it - they are trying to do what's right for ETH because the block reward is 95% of their revenues Also, with EIP 1559 on the table, trying to increase fees makes no sense | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1275102585284747265 2020-06-22 09:25:21 -0700 <elusivechad> @bilhandlaren1 @inmortalcrypto Oh it will happen, once we have EIP 1337, previously known as EIP 1559... | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1275123507765133312 2020-06-22 10:48:29 -0700 <AviFelman> 3. High gas fees on Ethereum reflect increased demand for blockspace. Whether ETH accrues value from this will be another debate that might capture mindshare. With EIP-1559 coming up this will only bring this narrative to more prominence and boldens the case for value accrual | 2 replies 3 retweets 25 likes | |
| 1275161766897446912 2020-06-22 13:20:31 -0700 <DefiMoon> @delitzer @RyanSAdams @TrustlessState Solid podcast. On ETH value capture off DeFi: staking in 2.0 + eth fee burn via EIP-1559. New DAI-like stablecoins with eth as collateral. | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1275177532837507072 2020-06-22 14:23:10 -0700 <BYOBBTC> @Bitcoinnwise @vakeraj @danny_knight But dont forget that with EIP 1559 and POS, the annual ETH issuance will be smaller than BTC | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1275200891922993152 2020-06-22 15:55:59 -0700 <MikeAbundo> "Gas" is the term for @Ethereum transaction fees. As network usage has risen over the last five years, gas prices have risen to over 30 gwei on most days. Here's hoping improvements like EIP-1559 and ETH2 help Ethereum's success scale. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1275214698087055360 2020-06-22 16:50:51 -0700 <ceterispar1bus> @panekkkk There are 4+ real, bullish catalysts all taking place in tandem. ETHE shares unlocking, DeFi boon, ETH 2.0 staking, and EIP 1559 are all fundamental, structural shifts that should create a strong bid for eth, more so than any other time. Asking for more is getting greedy. | 0 replies 1 retweets 8 likes | |
| 1275273957885632514 2020-06-22 20:46:19 -0700 <shutterbugsid> Why aren't we talking more about EIP 1559? Elastic gas limit on blocks seems fascinating but yet to deepdive into the cons of that approach. To get started this is a brilliant take: https://t.co/amojrmhHXs | 0 replies 3 retweets 20 likes | |
| 1275295294683402242 2020-06-22 22:11:06 -0700 <DecentralStn> @DegenSpartan @ASvanevik @Arthur_0x @1inchExchange @deversifi So that’s that! Despite so many L2 layers and tokens, nothing can be done here. Even if L2 layers are successful, it is helpful only if you maintain funds in the exchange contract/layer. So if you go in and out, still the gas is high. Let’s see what happens with EIP-1559! | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1275378768803069954 2020-06-23 03:42:48 -0700 <AFDudley0> @Arthur_0x EIP-1559 helps with this, as a side effect. | 1 replies 0 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1275380164885544961 2020-06-23 03:48:21 -0700 <AFDudley0> @_Ed1990_ The part I implied out is, it only makes sense to hit that contract if it's in a chain of other uniswap trades, otherwise other curves will be more gas efficient. and figuring out gas efficiency in this pre EIP-1559 world is really complicated. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1275381598951632896 2020-06-23 03:54:03 -0700 <vjsingh102> #Ethereum transaction fees are currently too high for average people to do average transactions. #EIP1559 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1275429629520740357 2020-06-23 07:04:54 -0700 <lightcoin> @bitchimlying @RyanSAdams this seems like a misunderstanding. under eip1559 only the basefee is burned. the premium is kept by miners. https://t.co/MBSrOa6WLl | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1275438299880947712 2020-06-23 07:39:21 -0700 <TimBeiko> EIP-1559 Implementers' Call #3 tomorrow 😁 We now have a page on ethereum/pm with past meeting notes 📝 https://t.co/1GQjo3IvPW Agenda for tomorrow 📆: https://t.co/9Y516rmKOe Livestream (first time!!)📺: https://t.co/OqdLgtINiz https://t.co/7WXeTH9J6a | 2 replies 10 retweets 40 likes | |
| 1275538170826891264 2020-06-23 14:16:12 -0700 <LUKACACIC> @OhhAudie @ethereum EIP 1559 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1275542297380368384 2020-06-23 14:32:36 -0700 <cypher_m00n> @farmerdefi EIP1559 is a meme that has been around for years. Never been included in any actual plans | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1275672964357410817 2020-06-23 23:11:50 -0700 <shenchristw> Buying stuff online with #crypto is acutally quite easy and fun. Many shops have intergrated @CommerceCB, which has a great UI. The @ethereum GAS fee is not so fun though. :( @VitalikButerin Any fixes, EIP-1559? https://t.co/hkOhOwpmth | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1275709766594166784 2020-06-24 01:38:04 -0700 <ethereumita> #GasMarket-#Eip1559- #Escalator #Algorithm @gichiba https://t.co/2TgxOaZ7Cv #ethereumitalia @ethereum #eth #blockchain | 0 replies 2 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1275733306634534915 2020-06-24 03:11:36 -0700 <DarkCryptoLord> $LTO +9% Hope you guys bought the retest! Adopting the EIP-1559 Based Fee Burner proposal for $ETH is an insanely smart choice, especially for coins like LTO which does ALOT of transactions More usage = more burn = more value p.s I'll 20x long ETH when EIP1559 gets implemented https://t.co/Jj1f8ws9pq | 0 replies 1 retweets 6 likes | |
| 1275752630946615296 2020-06-24 04:28:24 -0700 <FigoETH> As soon as EIP1559 is implemented DeFi usage directly impacts the supply and therefore the price of ETH. Few understand this. | 7 replies 20 retweets 116 likes | |
| 1275759107983753217 2020-06-24 04:54:08 -0700 <LiamJanssens> @FigoFinozeros @antiprosynth That's the problem "as soon as" the fact that the ethereum network is growing so rapidly yet ether doesn't move just shows how flawed the tokeneconomics are. Hope eip1559 comes soon to solve this. | 2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1275768240552267776 2020-06-24 05:30:25 -0700 <farmwell123> would be interested in regular status updates on EIP 1559 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1275795011863547904 2020-06-24 07:16:48 -0700 <b_d_thompson> Valuing Ether: Staking yields + EIP-1559(burned fees) provide direct value accrual to ETH holders/stakers. Block rewards, while necessary for security, detract from value accrual. Therefore ETH yield = staking yield%(or lend rate%) + fee burn%(and lost ETH%) - new issuance% | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1275795012744351744 2020-06-24 07:16:48 -0700 <b_d_thompson> Currently yield = negative ~4%. There is only new issuance and no staking yield or fee burns. Yield once POS + EIP-1559 are implemented assuming current fees and 30% of ETH is staked = ~3% (3.3% staking yield + 1% fee burn - 1% new issuance). | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1275799272093618176 2020-06-24 07:33:44 -0700 <RyanWatkins_> It is possible that within a couple years, ETH may not only be the most useful asset in crypto given its on-chain economy, but also crypto’s most credibly scarce asset given ETH 2.0 and EIP 1559. Only time will tell. https://t.co/IplOvSNtDz | 6 replies 17 retweets 72 likes | |
| 1275809861692002304 2020-06-24 08:15:49 -0700 <hasufl> Today, @gakonst and I continue our review of blockspace market proposals with EIP-2593, better known as “escalating bid algorithm”, or “escalator”. We analyze the idea that is hailed as an alternative to EIP-1559 and suggest a more appropriate framing. https://t.co/2WDQTtMEZ2 | 4 replies 51 retweets 142 likes | |
| 1275812658185453568 2020-06-24 08:26:55 -0700 <hasufl> If you followed the debate on EIP-1559 but don't know about the escalator yet: The proponents of this proposal like 1559's UX benefits for fee estimation, but find it too complex and difficult to implement. So they hope to capture some of the benefits with a much simpler change. | 1 replies 0 retweets 7 likes | |
| 1275821940293459969 2020-06-24 09:03:48 -0700 <tokenstate> Staking ETH yield, EIP-1559 & dramatic issuance reduction is what will make BTC lose it's lead imo. Remember these same Maxis told everyone staking was a 'scam' a few years ago. | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1275825733042966528 2020-06-24 09:18:53 -0700 <edmundedgar> @alexgausman @Foobazzler No, you're right and @Foobazzler is wrong. Miners get tips, but if it's is functioning as intended they'll be trivial, just enough to cover the increased orphan risk of including a tx. The money is being taken from miners, unless fees paid go up, which EIP1559 fans normally deny | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1275828076715429889 2020-06-24 09:28:11 -0700 <FigoETH> @LiamJanssens @antiprosynth I wouldn't say this. EIP1559 is just one pillar which does have an impact. Main other ones are: - Staking in ETH 2.0 (likely very attractive for institutional investors in a QE environment) - ETH locked up in DeFi as collateral | 2 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1275833436289200131 2020-06-24 09:49:29 -0700 <edmundedgar> @Foobazzler @alexgausman EIP1559 enthusiasts normally say, "with this EIP ETH could go deflationary", which implies fees are going to be bigger than block rewards. But either way, to get the same security you just need to print whatever you burn to make up. Tiny security loss = tiny hodler benefit. | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1275861335612538883 2020-06-24 11:40:21 -0700 <TimBeiko> Fee Market Implementers' Call #3 in 20 minutes! Packed agenda today, with the goal of hopefully coming to agreement on a combination of EIP-1559, escalator fees and possibly EIP-2718. Agenda: https://t.co/9Y516rEmcO Stream: https://t.co/4gpwVvCu9Q | 1 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1275876408456286208 2020-06-24 12:40:15 -0700 <FigoETH> @RyanTheGentry @jlppfeffer You sure you read the post to the end? Btw: ETH is locked in DeFi, burned with EIP 1559 and staked in ETH 2 --> soon better SoV than BTC. Gas is used to pay for txs and is denominated in ETH. Pfeffer does not understand this. https://t.co/IPadaEJyUG | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1275877442587148292 2020-06-24 12:44:21 -0700 <RyanTheGentry> @FigoFinozeros @jlppfeffer Neither EIP-1559 nor PoS are guarantees to happen at all, and are locks not to happen this year. Invalid. "Relegated to working capital" means used only for gas. Businesses ruthlessly minimize the amount of working capital on their balance sheet. Already happening via meta-txs | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1275878842297712641 2020-06-24 12:49:55 -0700 <FigoETH> @RyanTheGentry @jlppfeffer ETH 2 phase 0 is estimated for Q3/Q4. EIP 1559 either end of 2020 (rather unlikely) or 2021. Not invalid at all, you should do some research. ETH is not Gas. See explanation above. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1275881125337092096 2020-06-24 12:58:59 -0700 <RyanTheGentry> @FigoFinozeros @jlppfeffer The beacon chain does not solve this problem. It will only finalize miner-adjusted blocks. Data shards solve this problem, when are they projected for? Thank you for agreeing with me re: EIP-1559. Stop believing hypemasters. Think for yourself. | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1275884692861059073 2020-06-24 13:13:10 -0700 <FigoETH> @RyanTheGentry @jlppfeffer Point is: ETH is not working capital (which is Gas). ETH is a SoV. ETH 2 phase 0 is happening in Q3/Q4 and enables staking, leading to a reduced ETH supply --> ETH will become more scarce. If EIP 1559 happens in 2020 or 2021 is irrelevant. | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1275884953008574467 2020-06-24 13:14:12 -0700 <TimBeiko> 1️⃣ To Bundle or Not To Bundle - There was a lot of discussion of the impact bundling EIP-1559 and Escalator Fees would have on implementation complexity, user privacy, further analyses of the change, and, most importantly, the timeline at which the change could be deployed. | 1 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1275885902091386881 2020-06-24 13:17:58 -0700 <TimBeiko> 2️⃣ Testing, Testing, Testing EIP-1559/Escalator fees are a pretty sweeping change and we want to be sure we test it accordingly. Again, there was a lot of discussion on the call about how to best test things, ideally incrementally. | 1 replies 0 retweets 6 likes | |
| 1275897634872528907 2020-06-24 14:04:35 -0700 <on_ethereum> EIP 1559 Implementers’ Call #3 via @on_ethereum | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1275901543573630976 2020-06-24 14:20:07 -0700 <AlexSaundersAU> @iamDCinvestor EIP 1559 burning base fee will make this more tolerable | 2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1275919996812529664 2020-06-24 15:33:27 -0700 <TrustlessState> Really important thread on the updates to EIP1559 progress! Lots of good takeaways and next-steps in here! | 0 replies 10 retweets 37 likes | |
| 1275932613463560193 2020-06-24 16:23:35 -0700 <AFDudley0> @lightclients @TimBeiko With EIP-1559 there are two risks we need to be concerned with: 1. Changing transactions impacts nearly everything that interacts with Ethereum, we can't possibly test all of it before deployment. 2. The mechanism change itself may be unsafe. | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1275968007446114304 2020-06-24 18:44:13 -0700 <ariefaz> EIP 1559 and the Ethereum Improvement Horizon #Ethereum via https://t.co/OwIB0zQ3P0 https://t.co/B4Wz2NPxnV | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1276040289078124544 2020-06-24 23:31:27 -0700 <Crypto_Briefing> #Ethereum's native asset, Ether, has outperformed #Bitcoin by over 50% in 2020. With growth drivers in the form of DeFi, EIP 1559, and $ETH 2.0, this trend is likely to continue as investors start to price in ETH's fundamentals. https://t.co/LKIYlZRFIo | 0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1276043424228147202 2020-06-24 23:43:54 -0700 <webnowcompany> Ethereum&#8217;s native asset, Ether, has outperformed Bitcoin by over 50% in 2020. With growth drivers in the form of DeFi, EIP 1559, and ETH 2.0, this tr...Read more: https://t.co/Ds1jbQZlfr | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1276051636914438144 2020-06-25 00:16:32 -0700 <webnowcompany> #ETH #DEFI #BTC #STORM #GAS #NET Ethereum’s native asset, Ether, has outperformed Bitcoin by over 50% in 2020. With growth drivers in the form of DeFi, EIP 1559, and ETH 2.0, this trend is...Read more: https://t.co/5gZNCA0fdH | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1276059359664123904 2020-06-25 00:47:14 -0700 <CHalexov2016> #ethereum $eth chart by @CoinCap_io by @ShapeShift_io @ErikVoorhees looks great. I feel we will see new ATH as soon as full ETH2 will be live! So no more pow and only pos and 160k tps and i hope eip1559 in work 🪐😜🪐 https://t.co/PIaVRp9j4Z | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1276059902243246081 2020-06-25 00:49:23 -0700 <crypto_lamba> It is possible that within a couple years, ETH may not only be the most useful asset in crypto given its on-chain economy, but also crypto’s most credibly scarce asset given ETH 2.0 and EIP 1559. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1276071725348851712 2020-06-25 01:36:22 -0700 <ethereumita> EIP 1559 + DEFI + POS ---> 2020 is huge un crypto space #ethereum #defi #pos #eip1559 | 2 replies 10 retweets 41 likes | |
| 1276114571766509568 2020-06-25 04:26:37 -0700 <b_d_thompson> @0xEther Once we have fee burns (Eip-1559), I think it's clear what happens. | 1 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1276129733965733889 2020-06-25 05:26:52 -0700 <cburgdorf> TIL: The BASEFEE in EIP 1559 could be used as an on-chain oracle for congestion. That would be very useful for protocols like @MakerDAO et al. to adjust variables based on how congested the chain is. | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1276129843998887937 2020-06-25 05:27:18 -0700 <Gargant34260060> @TimBeiko It slows getting this implemented & 4 v minor added value. Better 2 implement the base eip1559 and of still needed then implement later as its complementary... but even then it should be considered against the principle of Ethereum that wants to keep unnecessary things off L1 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1276135737641938946 2020-06-25 05:50:43 -0700 <Gargant34260060> @TimBeiko If it’s not clear then yes let us all please read the deribit analysis and dans rebuttal ( which is not really rebutting the core insights- just justifying the original proposal for escalator - which seems a good complement to Eip1559 just not worth delaying over | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1276161391146283010 2020-06-25 07:32:40 -0700 <hasufl> @SomsenRuben @RainDogDance @zndtoshi @ercwl we can talk about EIP-1559 though if you want, because I don't understand the attack you described. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1276182763364708352 2020-06-25 08:57:35 -0700 <elusivechad> @sk_yy7 @WernerMS @galaxyBTC If EIP1559 and network activity led to ETH supply being deflationary, it could happen way faster than that. Maybe 2030 depending on burn rate. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1276195300609265665 2020-06-25 09:47:24 -0700 <imrane> @bradmillscan You do realize DeFi only kicked off a year ago right? You do know about EIP 1559? You do know about @baselineproto, @NexusMutual, @Dxdao_, and everything else on @EverestRegistry is being built on Ethereum If not, I don't think your opinion about ETH matters | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1276197378048090112 2020-06-25 09:55:40 -0700 <gakonst> ICYMI: This week @hasufl & I analyzed EIP-2593, aka the "escalator" proposal and compared it to EIP-1559. This piece concluded our research on Ethereum blockspace market proposals. Follow up pieces will be on past and future proposals for #Bitcoin | 0 replies 3 retweets 17 likes | |
| 1276231109207080967 2020-06-25 12:09:42 -0700 <stonecoldpat0> What is it about EIP-1559 that gets you excited? | 6 replies 13 retweets 18 likes | |
| 1276412019374092289 2020-06-26 00:08:34 -0700 <Gargant34260060> @nicksdjohnson @hasufl @danfinlay @dankrad @CurrencyTycoon @_prestwich @gakonst No the status quo doesn’t handle as well. Users currently have the headache of deciding a fee- that could be avoided when prices are stable w eip1559 | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1276412620950474752 2020-06-26 00:10:58 -0700 <Gargant34260060> @danfinlay @TimBeiko @hasufl Right so how much of the time would eip1559 do that? Because any time it does is an improvement on what we have today | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1276486089310703616 2020-06-26 05:02:54 -0700 <hasufl> @jadler0 @gross_bit @Mable_Jiang Btw, this is a great use case for congestion controlled mass-exit post EIP-1559! As long as chain congestion is provably >x, the exit period extends itself indefinitely until everyone who’s willing to pay y has had the chance to get their money out. | 2 replies 3 retweets 11 likes | |
| 1276487430036762625 2020-06-26 05:08:13 -0700 <hasufl> EIP-1559 can make mass-exit games viable because it is the first secure oracle for on-chain congestion. | 3 replies 10 retweets 37 likes | |
| 1276488183790927874 2020-06-26 05:11:13 -0700 <Chloethedev> @hasufl @jadler0 @gross_bit @Mable_Jiang Even with EIP-1559 and the ABILITY to have everyone exit in time, a solution needs to be provided that "actually" would allow every average joe user to exit within 48 hours at a click of a button. Maybe wallet providers could offer a *emergency exit* button for each protocol? | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1276493891315916801 2020-06-26 05:33:54 -0700 <Chloethedev> @dankrad @hasufl 1559 isn't Superwoman 🤷🏽♀️. Can't do it all. Yes, things go back to normal (as they have to) but it's better than without 1559. Mass exit is not a problem that can be "solved" and I definitely shouldn't have insinuated that something as simple as EIP-1559 could solve it. Sorry 🥰 | 0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1276510889194258432 2020-06-26 06:41:27 -0700 <TheCoinRadar_> New post: The 1.x Files: EIP 1559 and the Ethereum Improvement Horizon https://t.co/HAltkjt0TU | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1276520822375460865 2020-06-26 07:20:55 -0700 <desh_saurabh> EIP 1559 is needed. @shutterbugsid | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1276530262084648967 2020-06-26 07:58:25 -0700 <TimBeiko> @JHancock says if we were to require a certain threshold of client diversity to ship EIP-1559, we'd probably get a whole bunch of people running minority clients 😛 | 1 replies 0 retweets 7 likes | |
| 1276536657492226048 2020-06-26 08:23:50 -0700 <TimBeiko> I missed the implementation details (📺!), but some examples given by @lightclients are new txn type introduced by EIP-1559, EIP-2711 ( https://t.co/2LfcSy5G0P) which seems like a sort of meta-transaction, EIP-2733 ( https://t.co/fTPqyLM2rX), and even Account Abstraction 🎉 | 1 replies 2 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1276543681357647878 2020-06-26 08:51:45 -0700 <iamDCinvestor> @krugman25 @sassal0x It's possible, but given that marginal is already fairly low, I'd rather have comfortably "safe" issuance and instead focus all energy on getting EIP-1559 (for fee burning) or related into the protocol as soon as it is safe to do so. | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1276586638223826944 2020-06-26 11:42:27 -0700 <FigoETH> @RydesaurusRex @CerealTable @AriDavidPaul It not depends just on EIP 1559. Staking with ETH 2.0 (earning 3-5% interest) and DeFi lockup are similar important. All leading to ETH being a SoV. | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1276587921420648448 2020-06-26 11:47:32 -0700 <OliviaLovenmark> EIP 1559 (proposes better gas price efficiency) is a critical part of Ethereum’s economics & would better the user experience for sure, but not sure it’s make or break at this point | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1276588608523317254 2020-06-26 11:50:16 -0700 <spencernoon> @AriDavidPaul No major networks have anything that resembles EIP 1559 either. Does that mean they're all DOA too? | 0 replies 1 retweets 13 likes | |
| 1276591364667473920 2020-06-26 12:01:13 -0700 <iamDCinvestor> @hasufl @TimBeiko @AriDavidPaul This is also a reason why I think we should implement EIP-1559 or similar in eth1, even though the concept is already in the eth2 spec. It helps to offset this issuance reduction, and offers a credible "backup" with a "harder" ETH in case eth2 is not workable for some reason. | 0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1276591635707674624 2020-06-26 12:02:18 -0700 <iamDCinvestor> @JHancock @AriDavidPaul I believe it's basically the same mechanism for fee burning as EIP-1559. Maybe @dannyryan can clarify. | 0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1276598586902446082 2020-06-26 12:29:55 -0700 <TimBeiko> The EIP-1559 @Gitcoin Grant is up 🎉✨ https://t.co/l71AAx9i6p As mentioned on the last implementers' call, the goal is to use funds to both pay for multi-client development, testing/auditing, and for the community to signal its support for the EIP. | 4 replies 32 retweets 127 likes | |
| 1276600078011174912 2020-06-26 12:35:51 -0700 <iamDCinvestor> EIP-1559 is important, and represents a critical improvement to Ethereum. We need to do the research and get it done right. I've donated 500 DAI to help fund these efforts. And I hope you'll join me and donate even a few DAI to signal your support. | 3 replies 21 retweets 104 likes | |
| 1276608944970977280 2020-06-26 13:11:05 -0700 <econoar> I just gave $2,500 to the EIP-1559 Gitcoin Grant. If you're someone that wants to see this EIP happen, put your money where your mouth is and let's work together as a community to get it funded. https://t.co/FJuOqM6ZMy | 10 replies 44 retweets 266 likes | |
| 1276609137502232577 2020-06-26 13:11:51 -0700 <Thavash> @VitalikButerin @AriDavidPaul EIP 1559 is chocolate on the 2.0 ice cream | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1276611128798449666 2020-06-26 13:19:46 -0700 <meeseeking> EIP-1559 is one of the most important things on #Ethereum's roadmap. It improves UX greatly, it makes dealing with fees simpler, & it also burns $ETH supply. I gave 20 ETH to support the EIP-1559 @gitcoin grant to help actualize it. #publicgoods | 3 replies 38 retweets 195 likes | |
| 1276611130723631111 2020-06-26 13:19:46 -0700 <meeseeking> This next item on the roadmap, EIP-1559, directly helps the constraints that ETH 1.x is bumping against right now in terms of fee UX & gas estimation problems. The improved certainty it brings to the gas fee mkt should also help keep gas prices from spiking. Solves big problems. | 2 replies 0 retweets 12 likes | |
| 1276611131491135495 2020-06-26 13:19:46 -0700 <meeseeking> And it solves the big problems that Ethereum users are struggling with TODAY, the problems that #Ethereum's successes in finding product market fit has brought to the fore. I can not wait for EIP-1559, it's a game changer and a constraint reliever. | 1 replies 1 retweets 14 likes | |
| 1276611133068259332 2020-06-26 13:19:47 -0700 <meeseeking> The implementation of EIP-1559 is something that will make all their hard work shine. So supporting it with the limited ways I can makes sense. I gave 20 ETH. I can't wait to see the next thing that will unlock #Ethereum and ETH 1.x. I hope you agree and give what you can too. | 1 replies 2 retweets 12 likes | |
| 1276611813933608960 2020-06-26 13:22:29 -0700 <DeFi_Dad> @econoar If EIP1559 goes through, ETH may rise to $2500 anyways, so good ROI here. I’m dumbfounded why anyone wouldn’t support this. It really would secure ETH as the rightful premier, scarce collateral on #Ethereum. | 1 replies 2 retweets 40 likes | |
| 1276615414013976578 2020-06-26 13:36:47 -0700 <MrJ3NKS> @VitalikButerin @AriDavidPaul Is my thesis correct? EIP 1559 makes eth value rise due to pseudo hardcap resulting in a more secure PoS chain? | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1276620202877358080 2020-06-26 13:55:49 -0700 <spencernoon> Incredible! The EIP-1559 @gitcoin grant has already raised more than $10k USD in ~1 hour. The Ethereum community is unmatched. https://t.co/liKeGfBCWh | 1 replies 21 retweets 116 likes | |
| 1276621623156711429 2020-06-26 14:01:28 -0700 <OtherBright> Le @gitcoin grant de l'EIP-1559 a déjà atteint 10K $, après seulement 1h d'existence. Vous soutenez le réseau Ethereum, l'ETH et leur communauté ? Si vous le pouvez, vous devriez participer, même pour 1 $. | 0 replies 1 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1276623539664154625 2020-06-26 14:09:05 -0700 <TrustlessState> I just donated 350 DAI to the EIP1559 Gitcoin Grant https://t.co/JwgnoufZ0D I'm excited to see this EIP move into the stages of needing $ for real-world testing and auditing. Plus at the end of the day this money is just coming back to me from the fee burn ✊🔥👩🚒 DONATE | 3 replies 13 retweets 65 likes | |
| 1276629821821530113 2020-06-26 14:34:02 -0700 <iamDCinvestor> If you want to learn more about EIP-1559, I recommend reading this: https://t.co/o44w6MrZRK | 0 replies 0 retweets 7 likes | |
| 1276631096013266945 2020-06-26 14:39:06 -0700 <antiprosynth> @AriDavidPaul I think that very little is make or break for Ethereum at this point. Not even Ethereum 2.0. EIP 1559 seems like a promising improvement though. | 2 replies 2 retweets 29 likes | |
| 1276633640953196544 2020-06-26 14:49:13 -0700 <nouveaucapital> @VitalikButerin The marketing on this is bad. Why? EIP-1559 is too abstract for the ordinary joe ETH investor, heck, even the educated ones. Express value prop with concrete examples/numbers. Root it in the real world. UNICEF doesn't tell you about starving kids; they show you their ribcages. | 0 replies 1 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1276634729844883458 2020-06-26 14:53:32 -0700 <IoT_programmer> 最近のガス代を背景に？basefee(プロトコルでの自動決定)とtipによるEIP1559が最近もまた良く出てきますね。 4桁ETHのガス事件も防げそう？さすがにtipでミスる可能性の方が低いですよね。 | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1276636324355878912 2020-06-26 14:59:53 -0700 <LUKACACIC> Let's get this EIP 1559 on the road. @ethereum #eth2 Let's Burn some $ETH 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 https://t.co/wGjQm6XL0t | 0 replies 11 retweets 79 likes | |
| 1276637393144209410 2020-06-26 15:04:07 -0700 <LUKACACIC> @JTremback @danrobinson @DeanEigenmann @VitalikButerin he is not. we the community want eip 1559. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1276638418752040961 2020-06-26 15:08:12 -0700 <brad_eth> Just donated to the EIP-1559 grant on @gitcoin! If you want to help improve #ethereum UX and future economics, consider doing the same! | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1276640393082425345 2020-06-26 15:16:03 -0700 <natechastain> I don't think ConsenSys gets enough credit for the amount of value it brings to Ethereum through its funding of protocol development (PegaSys, EIP1559). It has its problems on the product front, but I've been consistently impressed by the caliber of protocol engineers here. | 0 replies 0 retweets 7 likes | |
| 1276645405057404933 2020-06-26 15:35:58 -0700 <anajolsson> I just voted for EIP-1559 via quadratic funding on @gitcoin => https://t.co/PO2aNO1Y9w | 0 replies 3 retweets 27 likes | |
| 1276647471914106880 2020-06-26 15:44:10 -0700 <cryptow1re> #ethtrader 🤖: EIP-1559 grant - Help to develop it sooner https://t.co/eHFp8bXLgH | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1276647507725103105 2020-06-26 15:44:19 -0700 <cryptow1re> reddit 🤖: EIP-1559 grant - Help to develop it sooner https://t.co/9hJHlcfqlE | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1276648274812788737 2020-06-26 15:47:22 -0700 <marek_> @econoar The Celo network has been running its PoS version of Ethereum with EIP-1559 implemented since April 22. Hopefully, this can be a good resource for the Ethereum community as they consider this great EIP https://t.co/7TwXpRUgxa | 0 replies 2 retweets 14 likes | |
| 1276648873239277568 2020-06-26 15:49:45 -0700 <edmundedgar> @MrJ3NKS @VitalikButerin @AriDavidPaul That doesn't work because the money you burn is taken from stakers, you're just shuffling money between different classes of ETH holders. The point of EIP1559 is to fix the fee market, it's a shame it's also attracted a deflation cargo cult. | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1276656327826300932 2020-06-26 16:19:22 -0700 <VitalikButerin> @edmundedgar @MrJ3NKS @AriDavidPaul The subtlety is that this is a second-order claim about where the *risks* (ie. variance) get shifted, and not a claim that EIP 1559 introduces new possibilities in terms of *expected values*. | 0 replies 0 retweets 6 likes | |
| 1276671866761932800 2020-06-26 17:21:07 -0700 <harithk17> @VitalikButerin @iquidus @gitcoin to create a "no EIP 1559" grant and compare results? 🙈 have a feeling we'll see lots of $1 trolls though... | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1276673005876244480 2020-06-26 17:25:38 -0700 <AFDudley0> @jemenger @natechastain @JHancock I don't consider this dangerous ground because I don't see a viable alternative. For all the shit people talk about EIP-1559, where is the money? Why has serious engagement taken so long? People took a wait and see approach... no debate without code, which is completely backwards | 1 replies 0 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1276675888717979648 2020-06-26 17:37:06 -0700 <veliko_test3> EIP-1559 Grant - Please participate and spread the word! https://t.co/ih1HL0MMEK | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1276676097296551937 2020-06-26 17:37:55 -0700 <cryptow1re> reddit 🤖: EIP-1559 Grant - Please participate and spread the word! https://t.co/rbcoB92054 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1276678495410597888 2020-06-26 17:47:27 -0700 <DeFipedia> If you want to be proactive on the DeFi front, and you've already funded DeFipedia, consider funding EIP-1559 next! https://t.co/y8ns4p3hIX | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1276726257745637376 2020-06-26 20:57:14 -0700 <r_Ethereum> EIP-1559 Grant - Please participate and spread the word! #Ethereum https://t.co/xFiG1OsImI | 0 replies 8 retweets 29 likes | |
| 1276732501499633664 2020-06-26 21:22:03 -0700 <charlesdhaussy> 👍to @gitcoin on constant UX improvement. - I just funded EIP-1559 Community Fund grant 💪 - 👏@poojaranjan19 @TimBeiko @EthCatHerders @danfinlay @TinManPiano joining @Consensys & @ethereum efforts https://t.co/ykRSVB1ncn | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1276737099371339778 2020-06-26 21:40:19 -0700 <prasad2011> I just funded these 1 grants on @gitcoin https://t.co/ibiDq9zdWu Lets make EIP1559 real soon(TM) @iamDCinvestor | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1276754044854419456 2020-06-26 22:47:39 -0700 <AnettRolikova> Thank you @meeseeking for being so generous 💛 And for putting up this amazing thread about EIP1559 and it's importance 🙏 | 0 replies 3 retweets 22 likes | |
| 1276778576101232641 2020-06-27 00:25:08 -0700 <DomainAddress4u> EIP-1559 Grant - Please participate and spread the word! via /r/ethereum https://t.co/A7utynRbp7 hot 🔥 in #reddit #ethereum #eth #crypto | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1276786942798159875 2020-06-27 00:58:23 -0700 <svantetobias> Let's get #EIP1559 going! 🚀 | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1276802497114337280 2020-06-27 02:00:11 -0700 <jemenger> @OaktreeInv @JHancock Time will tell, but the ProgPoW audit received US $50K I believe. Perhaps EIP-1559 will get to that level. Thinking about it though these two initiatives require two very different kinds of evaluation work, so the amounts raised should not be compared numerically. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1276814817165262848 2020-06-27 02:49:09 -0700 <hugofirefreire> 🔥EIP 1559🔥 I just funded these 1 grants on @gitcoin => https://t.co/i3HYYTrCu0 | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1276824188733526017 2020-06-27 03:26:23 -0700 <OtherBright> @coderdannn @gitcoin EIP1559 🙂 | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1276851097894891521 2020-06-27 05:13:19 -0700 <khalo_0x> I signaled support with 20 DAI for the now critical EIP-1559. https://t.co/3Ce0O4eNER | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1276861671257112578 2020-06-27 05:55:20 -0700 <mysticryuujin> What if I told you that there's so much demand for Eth block space that EIP-1559 isn't going to do shit. We're going to be in a high gas price world for a long time (until rollups / plasma / sharding / whatever are common). Y'all wanted adoption and use cases. We found em. | 11 replies 5 retweets 71 likes | |
| 1276862494884143105 2020-06-27 05:58:36 -0700 <mysticryuujin> I should note, I'll still probably support EIP-1559, fee burn is cool. I just don't think it's actually going to fix gas prices and suddenly free up block utilization. | 3 replies 0 retweets 8 likes | |
| 1276869785788112899 2020-06-27 06:27:34 -0700 <sassal0x> I just donated $1,000 to the EIP-1559 Community Fund. This EIP will bring much needed improvements to the #Ethereum fee market and it also adds a fee burning mechanism which will strengthen the value accrual properties of ETH. Go donate 👇 https://t.co/G9IDcWoftt | 14 replies 31 retweets 220 likes | |
| 1276874419030409217 2020-06-27 06:45:59 -0700 <Lanfra68> @mysticryuujin You got me wrong. I'm not going to fight for or against EIP-1559. I only wanted to know your opininion. Mine is that if it doesn't bring any good on gas costs and has "no negative effects" its utility is arguable. Nevertheless if someone wants to implement it then go ahead. | 1 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1276877849333501953 2020-06-27 06:59:37 -0700 <yulesa> @mysticryuujin EIP-1559 is not about reducing fees. It's about making them more predictable and improve ETH value preposition. Fees will be reduced in the same size of first auction inefficiency (which is not a big reduction). | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1276885620556734464 2020-06-27 07:30:29 -0700 <JimmyRagosa> @mysticryuujin Nobody sold EIP-1559 as a scalability solution. | 1 replies 0 retweets 9 likes | |
| 1276890281833447424 2020-06-27 07:49:01 -0700 <econoar> Official logo of eip-1559? 🔥 | 4 replies 6 retweets 89 likes | |
| 1276891051861651458 2020-06-27 07:52:04 -0700 <aliatiia_> To blunt these vectors: community donates to categories, not specific EIPs. E.g. an EIP1559 supporter donates to categ: "Monetary Policy Research" and/or "Control of Supply/Demand of Blockspace" Advancement of EIPs shd remain a boring/technical process https://t.co/yt4DPmhONq | 1 replies 3 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1276891474026811392 2020-06-27 07:53:45 -0700 <adamscochran> Even if you can't donate a lot to EIP-1559 (better UX and fee burning for Ethereum) donate 1 DAI to their Gitcoin campaign. A 1 DAI donation right now will be matched with $106. $106 of funding for you chipping in $1 - to get fee burning. No brainer. https://t.co/VhTALWmcCr | 0 replies 14 retweets 46 likes | |
| 1276897886156943361 2020-06-27 08:19:14 -0700 <econoar> EIP-1559 community fund grant is up to $25,000 in donations and is slated for an additional $9,000 in matching. Let’s keep it going. https://t.co/FJuOqM6ZMy | 4 replies 17 retweets 85 likes | |
| 1276905409626771456 2020-06-27 08:49:08 -0700 <Danny_Desert> I just funded these 1 grants on @gitcoin => https://t.co/KnYSLk2mul #EIP1559 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1276908394750902273 2020-06-27 09:00:59 -0700 <cryptow1re> reddit 🤖: Vitalik acknowledges contributing to the EIP-1559 grant as an effective way to show community support https://t.co/Nn0oUxLwl8 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1276908466641174528 2020-06-27 09:01:16 -0700 <cryptow1re> #ethtrader 🤖: Vitalik acknowledges contributing to the EIP-1559 grant as an effective way to show community support https://t.co/WIbzF4AvAL | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1276909316205731840 2020-06-27 09:04:39 -0700 <elusivechad> @Lanfra68 @mysticryuujin EIP-1559 is still great for the economics. This hilarious video explains: "They're going to out Austrian-economics us!" https://t.co/zMSrqrr5iQ | 0 replies 1 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1276928140174999553 2020-06-27 10:19:27 -0700 <owocki> Woah this "EIP 1559 community fund" @gitcoin grant came outta nowhere. 123 contributions in the last 2 days. https://t.co/D1JJH0ZWAb https://t.co/6uyb14IIFk | 0 replies 3 retweets 22 likes | |
| 1276928320073076739 2020-06-27 10:20:10 -0700 <Nkosi_Dlungwane> The EIP-1559 @Gitcoin Grant is up 🎉✨ https://t.co/bAvYXIYHby… As mentioned on the last implementers' call, the goal is to use funds to both pay for multi-client development, testing/auditing, and for the community to signal its support for the EIP. https://t.co/wNKX9PchJX | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1276928553859203074 2020-06-27 10:21:06 -0700 <PJusername> @CoinDeskData EIP1559 soon or we riot! 😂 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1276930427383689219 2020-06-27 10:28:32 -0700 <CHalexov2016> @VitalikButerin btw how much out of 300k + $eth #ethereum did you donate for eip1559 team ? 😇😜🪐 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1276936688971980800 2020-06-27 10:53:25 -0700 <rafdo> @joezabb This is why they need to implement EIP 1559, it would take the GAS guessing game out of the equation. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1276952381490475008 2020-06-27 11:55:47 -0700 <x_ETHeREAL_x> All #ETH holders should donate at least $1 for EIP-1559 on @gitcoin TODAY. This is the highest ROI you will ever get: even will $1 be matched up to 110x, and the gain in ETH value from this EIP will be HUGE. Publicly signaling EIP support is critical. https://t.co/Xk9oKDMjes | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1276955492414304263 2020-06-27 12:08:08 -0700 <LefterisJP> @bitfalls @antiprosynth Isn't ETH2 phase 0 kind of expected super soon? While EIP-1559 is still in not accepted/discussion phase? | 1 replies 0 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1276973636956467201 2020-06-27 13:20:14 -0700 <ncchan93> @mysticryuujin @antiprosynth Lol if we're complaining about high gas prices now... just wait until the bull market peak! EIP1559 just standardizes the gas fee for the ppl that don't care about timing. IMO its going to do more for the price of ETH, since it may lower eth1 issuance to 0. | 0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1276977860578869248 2020-06-27 13:37:01 -0700 <OtherBright> @Joss_do_it_BTC @Smartchain_ @lugaxker @_NicolasCantu Pour le mécanisme, cherche des infos vis à vis de l'EIP-1559, le plus vite ce sera fait, le mieux ce sera pour Ethereum, de mon point de vue. Et entre nous, Bitcoin pourrait subir, il me semble, ce genre de changement (je ne suis pas spécialiste du tout, je me méprends peut-être) | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1276979341096816652 2020-06-27 13:42:54 -0700 <Joss_do_it_BTC> @OtherBright @Smartchain_ @lugaxker @_NicolasCantu J'ai survolé EIP1559, ça parle de frais de gaz dynamique mais ça ne parle pas de brûler le gas pour faire diminuer la suply. EIP2559 ne semble pas proposer un déflation de la quantité de foin mais j'ai lu en diagonale | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1276984772154327042 2020-06-27 14:04:29 -0700 <CoinBlick> ⬆️ on Reddit: Vitalik acknowledges contributing to the EIP-1559 grant as an effective way to show community support https://t.co/toLrll4RSL | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1276988785415331840 2020-06-27 14:20:26 -0700 <latetot> @PhABCD If it was burning ETH post eip-1559, it would be a lot more tolerable. | 1 replies 0 retweets 6 likes | |
| 1277013781428633600 2020-06-27 15:59:45 -0700 <21stCenturyFarm> @AriDavidPaul @VitalikButerin Ari is right because traders/momentum matter. As we all saw with $COMP attention can be bought. EIP 1559 is buying more attention. Do it already. To not ruthlessly seek growth at all costs is to be a negligent leader @VitalikButerin and leaves you open to attack. | 0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1277047086022897664 2020-06-27 18:12:06 -0700 <ChainNewscom> 【以太坊开发者就 EIP1559 提案在 Gitcoin 上发起融资，现已筹集 2.5 万美元】链闻消息，以太坊开发者正就以太坊改进提案 EIP 1559 在开源软件资助平台 Gitcoin 上发起二次融资活动，向社区寻求资…… https://t.co/beKyHB2amJ | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1277052817396699136 2020-06-27 18:34:52 -0700 <TheCoinRadar_> New post: The 1.x Files: EIP 1559 and the Ethereum Improvement Horizon https://t.co/HAltkjt0TU | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1277053779611811840 2020-06-27 18:38:42 -0700 <Gargant34260060> @latetot @PhABCD This 👆... also wouldn’t it be nice if eip1559 included ability to detect ponzi type scams and redirect fees to a dev fund 😁 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1277065595545022464 2020-06-27 19:25:39 -0700 <ChainLinkGod> @bitconeeeeeeect People are sleeping on passive income from staking $ETH and EIP-1559 fee burning | 1 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1277069323853598720 2020-06-27 19:40:28 -0700 <BitcoinAddictTH> นักพัฒนา Ethereum เสนอให้ใช้ “EIP 1559” เพื่อหยุดยั้งปัญหาค่าธรรมเนียมที่สูงขึ้น https://t.co/bQYNSOEI3E | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1277101535197986816 2020-06-27 21:48:28 -0700 <sassal0x> @_webbstar88 @d_eleye @iamDCinvestor I will be writing about EIP-1559 for Monday's edition as well ;) | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1277131066579357697 2020-06-27 23:45:48 -0700 <nocturnalsheet> Weekend low gas, finally contributed to @gitcoin grants, wanted to limit it to my top 5 picks for this round. Also contributed in $ETH instead of $DAI. Say no to $DAI @DeFi_Dad @DefiantNews @1inchExchange @TornadoCash EIP-1559 community fund https://t.co/Xh0wcHyW8O | 5 replies 4 retweets 29 likes | |
| 1277145948234317824 2020-06-28 00:44:56 -0700 <blockchainlagos> Ethereum EIP 1559 will be the largest change to how users bid for blockspace in any of the major blockchains. https://t.co/CmZ07f2mOp | 0 replies 2 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1277159836451569664 2020-06-28 01:40:08 -0700 <realLedgerwatch> @LefterisJP @owocki And that is my main critique of this matching mechanism so far - everyone has to be play the same game against each other, even though they did not intend to. Example, I am sure none of EIP-1559 grant supported wanted to deprive other grants from CLR matching, but they have to | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1277164403561881600 2020-06-28 01:58:17 -0700 <DegenSpartan> @taha_zafar12 it slaves the BTCs and reinforces their second class citizenry relative to ETH, especially so if EIP-1559 rolls and and economic abstraction isnt possible anymore | 2 replies 0 retweets 8 likes | |
| 1277164581912145920 2020-06-28 01:58:59 -0700 <DegenSpartan> @molllliy i actually think it reaches a point where people will think "hmmm why don't i just have ETH on Ethereum rather than using BTC on Ethereum?" especially if fundamental milestones like EIP-1559 and 2.0 gets delivered still a long way to go for those to come though, haha | 1 replies 1 retweets 13 likes | |
| 1277168334719594501 2020-06-28 02:13:54 -0700 <OtherBright> @Joss_do_it_BTC @Smartchain_ @lugaxker @_NicolasCantu Bref EIP 1559 = exactement ton discours que pour Bitcoin, sauf qu'on pourrait même obtenir une déflation, et dans certains cas, si le réseau est peu utilisé, avoir de l'inflation (ce qui pour l'instant n'est pas pensable). | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1277169597297410048 2020-06-28 02:18:55 -0700 <taha_zafar12> @DegenSpartan EIP-1559 is a matter of when and not if. The Bitcoin block rewards are decreasing, the price isn't rising enough to match the miners costs and profit margins long term. And if migration continues in large numbers to Ethereum, its a major problem. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1277173392299511808 2020-06-28 02:34:00 -0700 <OtherBright> @Joss_do_it_BTC @Smartchain_ @lugaxker @_NicolasCantu Et ça va encore t'énerver, mais c'est un gros brouillon ce dont je viens de parler vis à vis de l'EIP 1559, et j'en rajoute une couche : même pour ce que j'ai présenté, ça n'est pas prêt d'être fixé. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1277179939708600320 2020-06-28 03:00:01 -0700 <TheDaoMaker> 📰Devs turn to the community to stop #Ethereum high fees 🔸#ETH devs turn to the #community to help fund ETH improvement proposal (EIP) 1559 🔸The EIP looks to check unwieldy #transaction fees 🔸Will this help with ETH’s recent $2.6 million fee “mistake”? https://t.co/nYydmcOv5u | 4 replies 46 retweets 50 likes | |
| 1277185822828052481 2020-06-28 03:23:23 -0700 <sassal0x> Want to learn more about EIP-1559 and its implications for the #Ethereum network? I'll be writing all about it in tomorrow's edition of The Daily Gwei! Subscribe so that you don't miss it 👇 https://t.co/nbSvkYlTul | 0 replies 11 retweets 43 likes | |
| 1277202439884718080 2020-06-28 04:29:25 -0700 <cryptow1re> reddit 🤖: Every person who donates just $1 to the progress of EIP-1559. $117 goes towards the fund. ELI5 - EIP-1559 r... https://t.co/O0FavGHHkt | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1277202609271721984 2020-06-28 04:30:05 -0700 <freebitcoindir> Every person who donates just $1 to the progress of EIP-1559. $117 goes towards the fund. ELI5 - EIP-1559 reduces... https://t.co/KH6cKfT4IS | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1277202972393394178 2020-06-28 04:31:32 -0700 <TokenJay> Every person who donates just $1 to the progress of EIP-1559. $117 goes towards the fund. ELI5 - EIP-1559 reduces the network fee significantly and adds a burn mechanic to the baselayer, improving the user experience and… https://t.co/TaCjCDRwvK #CryptoCurrency (from Reddit) https://t.co/2j3OXMnTzc | 0 replies 1 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1277203095689322497 2020-06-28 04:32:01 -0700 <iamDCinvestor> In the past 2 days, 165 unique contributors (@gitcoin record?) have opened their wallets to donate to EIP-1559 funding research & development. Have you? Even a small amount of tokens can help, via matching. And it adds your voice as a supporter. https://t.co/flWid6Dmvm | 4 replies 14 retweets 53 likes | |
| 1277203692429684738 2020-06-28 04:34:24 -0700 <cryptow1re> reddit 🤖: Every person who donates just $1 to the progress of EIP-1559. $117 goes towards the fund. ELI5 - EIP-1559 r... https://t.co/miTY2Q5tYU | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1277203879659212800 2020-06-28 04:35:08 -0700 <CryptoCryptoNe3> Every person who donates just $1 to the progress of EIP-1559. $117 goes towards the fund. ELI5 - EIP-1559 reduces the network fee significantly and adds a burn mechanic to the baselayer, improving the user experience and adding a deflationary ... - https://t.co/l4dPIQhbvi https://t.co/4DXnA0Djdn | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1277204431558324224 2020-06-28 04:37:20 -0700 <veliko_test3> Every person who donates just $1 to the progress of EIP-1559. $117 goes towards the fund. ELI5 - EIP-1559 reduces the network fee significantly and adds a burn mechanic to the baselayer, improving the user experience and adding a deflationary aspect to... https://t.co/ZXPQBQIzwB | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1277204622621450240 2020-06-28 04:38:06 -0700 <crypto___king> Every person who donates just $1 to the progress of EIP-1559. $117 goes towards the fund. ELI5 - EIP-1559 reduces the network fee significantly and adds a burn mechanic to the baselayer, improving the user experience and adding a deflationary aspect to ethereum. #cryptoking | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1277205501873291264 2020-06-28 04:41:35 -0700 <CryptoTraderPro> Every person who donates just $1 to the progress of EIP-1559. $117 goes towards the fund. ELI5 - EIP-1559 reduces the network fee significantly and adds a burn mechanic to the baselayer, improving the user experience and… https://t.co/87rYugKXvX ⟶ via https://t.co/Ko6HQzkpz1 https://t.co/0p21HCfOSd | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1277207271274053633 2020-06-28 04:48:37 -0700 <iamDCinvestor> Read more about EIP-1559 / fee burning in the following 3 links (1/3): https://t.co/MBEjsqEaRO | 1 replies 3 retweets 9 likes | |
| 1277209428115230723 2020-06-28 04:57:11 -0700 <r_Ethereum> Every person who donates just $1 to the progress of EIP-1559. $117 goes towards the fund. ELI5 - EIP-1559 reduces the network fee significantly and adds a burn mechanic to the baselayer, improving the user experience and adding a deflationary aspect to e… https://t.co/t1p6j2NQ7f | 3 replies 21 retweets 70 likes | |
| 1277211519659528193 2020-06-28 05:05:30 -0700 <CryptoNDaily> Every person who donates just $1 to the progress of EIP-1559. $117 goes towards the fund. ELI5 - EIP-1559 reduces the network fee significantly and adds a burn mechanic to the baselayer, improving the user experience and adding a deflationary aspect to e… https://t.co/ob9JGXpzgJ https://t.co/2BzgKfZmZP | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1277213775100284930 2020-06-28 05:14:28 -0700 <coincocoon> Every person who donates just $1 to the progress of EIP-1559. $117 goes towards the fund. ELI5 - EIP-1559 reduces the network fee significantly and adds a burn mechanic to the baselayer, improving the user experience and adding a deflationary aspect to e… https://t.co/ZHz60shkRk | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1277219569925369857 2020-06-28 05:37:29 -0700 <ashwathbk> @sassal0x @ASvanevik Oh wait. Is this net of EIP 1559 fee burns? | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1277222727091253248 2020-06-28 05:50:02 -0700 <x3tko> Every person who donates just $1 to the progress of EIP-1559. $117 goes towards the fund. ELI5 - EIP-1559 reduces... https://t.co/vMWrgDZnub | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1277225105387651072 2020-06-28 05:59:29 -0700 <blockchainbob4> @r_Ethereum @antiprosynth EIP 1559 looks like an over engineered wide sweeping centrally planned experiment to fix “fees are difficult to estimate” user problem. Bad engineering. | 1 replies 1 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1277237616132321281 2020-06-28 06:49:12 -0700 <sassal0x> Don't forget to check out the monthly Ethereum update with me and @AlexSaundersAU of @NuggetsNewsAU! We talk yield farming, Ethereum scaling, EIP-1559 and more. https://t.co/i7UwkTUPqv | 0 replies 9 retweets 39 likes | |
| 1277256779076972544 2020-06-28 08:05:21 -0700 <avonschulze> EIP-1559 just gained another unique funding address 😊 This is a HUGE proposal for $ETH and is definitely worth contributing to! Anything counts! That's to @gitcoin for making the process so seemless! | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1277261841408954372 2020-06-28 08:25:28 -0700 <QtBoris> Every person who donates just $1 to the progress of EIP-1559. $117 goes towards the fund. ELI5 - EIP-1559 reduces the network fee significantly and adds a burn mechanic to the baselayer, improving the user experience and adding a deflationary aspect to ethereum. … | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1277267916984135680 2020-06-28 08:49:36 -0700 <RyanSAdams> If stablecoins on Ethereum threaten the moneyness of ETH Why don't stablecoins on exchanges threaten the moneyness of BTC? If the first is true, so is the second And BTC doesn't have a scarcity mechanism like EIP1559 to protect itself | 2 replies 3 retweets 18 likes | |
| 1277275877370466304 2020-06-28 09:21:14 -0700 <RasJohnNjui> High #ETH fees on the #EThereum blockchain could soon be a thing of the past as the community raises 43 $ETH and more to fund the development of EIP1559. https://t.co/nBrL6Vbpv0 | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1277276854085353480 2020-06-28 09:25:07 -0700 <RyanWatkins_> @RyanSAdams I’m equally bullish on EIP 1559 and ETH 2.0 PoS issuance being very low. But right now these are promises of ETH not properties. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1277277842305437699 2020-06-28 09:29:02 -0700 <Zero____G> @AndrewDARMACAP Thanks for the reminder. I have EIP 1559 in the cart and some for Sassano. Would you suggest another one? | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1277278655144775683 2020-06-28 09:32:16 -0700 <webnowcompany> If you&#8217;ve been following Ethereum over the past few months, you&#8217;ve likely heard of EIP-1559. The post The Ethereum community is raising thousan...Read more: https://t.co/1mLGNYw80C | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1277280881217015808 2020-06-28 09:41:07 -0700 <CriptoNoticias> Escalator y EIP-1559: propuestas combinadas para bajar las comisiones de Ethereum #Tecnología https://t.co/YvpqQCUVe3 | 0 replies 1 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1277282973595901954 2020-06-28 09:49:26 -0700 <eudyzerpa> Escalator y EIP-1559: propuestas combinadas para bajar las comisiones de Ethereum #Tecnología https://t.co/NTs8s9q8Bp | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1277283991540785153 2020-06-28 09:53:29 -0700 <Libreinfo> Escalator y EIP-1559: propuestas combinadas para bajar las comisiones de #Ethereum https://t.co/0Cx2lsOc3W https://t.co/mBNo8saQ5S | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1277283993444970496 2020-06-28 09:53:29 -0700 <ClobigAnalyzer> Escalator y EIP-1559: propuestas combinadas para bajar las comisiones de #Ethereum https://t.co/oJnRDUJ8CX | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1277294961868730370 2020-06-28 10:37:04 -0700 <megustawaydn> Escalator y EIP-1559: propuestas combinadas para bajar las comisiones de Ethereum https://t.co/3SfIsFMvwn #criptomonedas https://t.co/f0OVPIhr2t | 0 replies 1 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1277303424321638400 2020-06-28 11:10:42 -0700 <RoganX4> I just funded EIP-1559 on @gitcoin (and you should too!) => https://t.co/qtEMAKXval | 0 replies 1 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1277311821234368513 2020-06-28 11:44:04 -0700 <the_crypto_feed> /r/ethereum: every person who donates just $1 to the progress of eip-1559. $117 goes towards the fund. eli5 - eip-1559 reduces the network fee significantly and adds a burn mechanic to the.. https://t.co/ykMuKOMiuD | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1277312510971064320 2020-06-28 11:46:48 -0700 <MorganTBennett> @r_Ethereum I cannot believe that after all this time #Ethereum is still at the “how do we fund this upgrade”-phase for EIP-1559 | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1277313233616089088 2020-06-28 11:49:40 -0700 <MorganTBennett> @r_Ethereum Why not splitting up EIP-1559 into two separate upgrades: 1. Fee burn upgrade (trivial to implement, yet more important) 2. Auctioning upgrade (not that trivial & less urgent). Also: subsidy reduction? 🙂 | 0 replies 1 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1277317180636327936 2020-06-28 12:05:21 -0700 <eudyzerpa> Escalator y EIP-1559: propuestas combinadas para bajar las comisiones de Ethereum https://www.criptonoticias.com/tecnologia/escalator-eip-1559-propuestas-combinadas-bajar-comisiones-ethereum/ #infosec #infosecurity #cybersecurity #security | 0 replies 3 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1277322762802077698 2020-06-28 12:27:32 -0700 <quixote_6> $ETH is not money, it's more akin to a CPU. $BTC is a CPU come SoV. Ethereum's best shot at value capture is not EIP 1559. It's joining #Bitcoin as an SoV. The next wave of true value in the space will derive from the chain-agnostic 'membranes', which will engulf the skeletons / | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1277330223139377152 2020-06-28 12:57:11 -0700 <Ch_Adamo> The #Ethereum #community has #crowdfunded 43 #ETH and $16,827 in #DAI towards the #development and #possible #implementation of #EIP1559. https://t.co/Ujm1obZrVk | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1277330230676525056 2020-06-28 12:57:13 -0700 <BitcoinNYSC> The #Ethereum #community has #crowdfunded 43 #ETH and $16,827 in #DAI towards the #development and #possible #implementation of #EIP1559. https://t.co/zenvTKGSCP | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1277331400467898370 2020-06-28 13:01:52 -0700 <Ch_Adamo> If you’ve been following #Ethereum over the #past few months, you’ve likely #heard of EIP-1559. EIP, of course, standing for #Ethereum #Improvement #Proposal, https://t.co/yvqbqdaqTM | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1277331406377672707 2020-06-28 13:01:53 -0700 <BitcoinNYSC> If you’ve been following #Ethereum over the #past few months, you’ve likely #heard of EIP-1559. EIP, of course, standing for #Ethereum #Improvement #Proposal, https://t.co/53BuPUGuB2 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1277333744244883461 2020-06-28 13:11:10 -0700 <hasufl> @uriklarman @TimBeiko @TheBlockBaron @Consensys I don't know anything about EIP-2718, this is the first time I hear about making EIP-1559 conditional on it. Regarding EIP-2593: It's nice to have, but not nearly important to warrant any delay in 1559. I would prefer to do it outside the protocol, in wallets. | 1 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1277346204586778624 2020-06-28 14:00:41 -0700 <franzvan> Escalator y EIP-1559: propuestas combinadas para bajar las comisiones de Ethereum https://t.co/HYok0H2IHQ | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1277369574732644352 2020-06-28 15:33:33 -0700 <CanalBitcoin> Escalator y EIP-1559: propuestas combinadas para bajar las comisiones de Ethereum https://t.co/2dCuYpbJjW https://t.co/iOGmvunGny | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1277416245587922944 2020-06-28 18:39:00 -0700 <kevin_weaver> Just funded a few grants on @gitcoin. EIP-1559 fund is currently matching $1 with $112 🤯 | 0 replies 0 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1277422377417142284 2020-06-28 19:03:22 -0700 <mjmoravec> Fund EIP-1559 now! @gitcoin => https://t.co/Pjafsum8uy | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1277426828865613824 2020-06-28 19:21:04 -0700 <tokendaily> 9/ Long Reads ⚡️ Where the NY Fed ‘Bitcoin Is Not New’ Blog Goes Wrong by @nic__carter 🔹 Analysis of EIP-1559 A detailed analysis by @hasufl and @georgios ◽️ The Hitchhiker’s Guide to Polkadot by @CryptiumLabs https://t.co/kXnu66O9T2 | 0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1277428857990270977 2020-06-28 19:29:07 -0700 <TheCoinRadar_> New post: The 1.x Files: EIP 1559 and the Ethereum Improvement Horizon https://t.co/HAltkjt0TU | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1277433754680770560 2020-06-28 19:48:35 -0700 <Stevie_Johnason> 9/ Long Reads ⚡️ Where the NY Fed ‘Bitcoin Is Not New’ Blog Goes Wrong by nic__carter 🔹 Analysis of EIP-1559 A detailed analysis by hasufl and georgios ◽️ The Hitchhiker’s Guide to Polkadot by CryptiumLabs https://t.co/5X88omhtFC | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1277461336465653760 2020-06-28 21:38:11 -0700 <CryptoEliteNews> Every person who donates just $1 to the progress of EIP-1559. $117 goes towards the fund. ELI5 - EIP... #ethereum #fee #network https://t.co/D4Rq5o3slP https://t.co/IqvcJR4RPR | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1277470932571996160 2020-06-28 22:16:19 -0700 <paveldcr> 💰 ✈️ 🥇 @zapper_fi @moonidapp & EIP-1559 Thanks @gitcoin for making batch transactions | 0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1277483198415400964 2020-06-28 23:05:03 -0700 <olguinmd> Escalator y EIP-1559: propuestas combinadas para bajar las comisiones de Ethereum https://t.co/OPhiO4hjnl https://t.co/Zcm7Wh1QZK | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1277502003732774914 2020-06-29 00:19:47 -0700 <jdetychey> I just funded these 1 grants on @gitcoin => https://t.co/nDOrhSX538 <3 GO EIP-1559 | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1277503201323991040 2020-06-29 00:24:32 -0700 <SCNGlobal> Ethereum developers are working on a Consensys-funded project called the EIP 1559, aimed at facilitating the automation of gas fee amounts set for each ETH transaction on the network. Full Story: https://t.co/LSB48d6wfn #Ethereum #Consensys #Gitcoin #EIP1559 #Gas | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1277503372162215936 2020-06-29 00:25:13 -0700 <DomainAddress4u> Every person who donates just $1 to the progress of EIP-1559. $117 goes towards the fund. ELI5 - EIP-1559 reduces the network fee significantly and adds a burn mechanic to the baselayer, improving the user experience and adding a deflationary aspect to ethereum. via /r/ether… | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1277508951324659713 2020-06-29 00:47:23 -0700 <CryptoBenelux1> Als je een fan van #Ethereum (ETH) bent, heb je waarschijnlijk wel eens gehoord van het verbetervoorstel EIP-1559. Lees hieronder meer ⬇️ https://t.co/JZ0cE89UGQ | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1277510243933708288 2020-06-29 00:52:31 -0700 <Teutonium> FA: And add to this the fact the $ETH EIP1559 and PoS 2.0 might launch in this time-frame, the bullishness of all of it only increases, PoS will probably reduce inflation to 0.5% and EIP1559 burns supply with each transaction! This means a HEAVY reduction in supply on the market! | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1277510755248726018 2020-06-29 00:54:33 -0700 <CryptoJournaal> EIP-1559 is één van de redenen waarom de Ethereum koers zal gaan stijgen, aldus analisten #Crypto_Journaal #Altcoin #Ethereum #ETH #Koers https://t.co/8SeLBfzMMI | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1277510955509956608 2020-06-29 00:55:21 -0700 <marioablancoa> Escalator y EIP-1559: propuestas combinadas para bajar las comisiones de Ethereum #Tecnología https://t.co/buE3xjIKMF Escalator y EIP-1559: propuestas combinadas para bajar las comisiones de Ethereum #Tecnología https://t.co/buE3xjIKMF — CriptoNoticias (CriptoNoticias) June … | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1277518424713728000 2020-06-29 01:25:02 -0700 <f2pool_official> #Ethereum proponents and developers launched a grant for EIP-1559 on the decentralized funding platform @gitcoin on Jun. 26. And a day after it’s launch, $25,000 has already been raised 🦾 @_Nick_Chong reporting in @CryptoSlate 👇 https://t.co/dVMHVOtZuC | 0 replies 0 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1277520393952264193 2020-06-29 01:32:51 -0700 <Economiaenllam1> las propuestas EIP-1559 y Escalator,los cuáles pretenden crear la figura de las propinas en Ether en el primero,y rangos de ofertas por transacciones en el segundo. ¿Cuajarán? Vemos que los ingenios se están poniendo a funcionar para encontrar soluciones en el mundo #blockchain | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1277528377306435584 2020-06-29 02:04:35 -0700 <SCNVietnam> Các nhà phát triển Ethereum đang làm việc với một dự án do Consensys tài trợ có tên EIP 1559, nhằm giúp tự động hóa số tiền phí gas được thiết lập cho mỗi giao dịch #ETH trên mạng. https://t.co/NsSyV7cxyn | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1277546397965877250 2020-06-29 03:16:11 -0700 <raise_hq> Give me EIP-1559 and let's 🚀 | 0 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1277555016774160384 2020-06-29 03:50:26 -0700 <CryptoVetXRP> Ethereum Community Raises Funds To Implement EIP-1559 - DC Forecasts via BTCnews on iOS https://t.co/akimB42sUi | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1277562389681057792 2020-06-29 04:19:44 -0700 <iamDCinvestor> In the past 3 days, an INCREDIBLE 265 contributors have donated to the EIP-1559 Community Fund- an incredible demonstration of community support for this initiative. Have you? There's still time to donate, and have it matched. Any amount is helpful. | 1 replies 13 retweets 35 likes | |
| 1277569483880751104 2020-06-29 04:47:55 -0700 <akropolisio> One of our next steps after the mainnet launch will be gas costs optimization, and we fully support EIP-1559 in their work! Already more than 250 people contributed towards ETH fees improvement - including our team. Make your voice heard and join us 🤓 https://t.co/bTCKr9po52 | 1 replies 14 retweets 43 likes | |
| 1277572040032124928 2020-06-29 04:58:05 -0700 <pleyuh> Just funded the EIP-1559 fund on @gitcoin Honestly, I don't care about fees. I always overpay sir Zhang and Wang to process my txs fast anyway. I signal my support for a mechanism that attaches $ETH price to on-chain activity. The community needs to plan for valuable ETH 🧑🔧 https://t.co/nR8mUx8Hfv | 1 replies 0 retweets 8 likes | |
| 1277582548353327105 2020-06-29 05:39:50 -0700 <Crypto_Chic_> If you’ve been following #Ethereum over the #past few months, you’ve likely #heard of EIP-1559. EIP, of course, standing for #Ethereum #Improvement #Proposal https://t.co/pxXy8m0pHF | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1277585569569058817 2020-06-29 05:51:50 -0700 <sassal0x> Today's edition of The Daily Gwei is all about the hotly anticipated EIP-1559 🔥 This EIP aims to greatly improve the current fee market on #Ethereum and add a fee burning mechanism that burns ETH. Read 👇 https://t.co/hyAvKogKiY | 3 replies 23 retweets 87 likes | |
| 1277586094222184450 2020-06-29 05:53:55 -0700 <iamDCinvestor> An accessible on quick-take on EIP-1559, in case you're wondering what everyone is talking about. | 0 replies 4 retweets 16 likes | |
| 1277589171540910082 2020-06-29 06:06:09 -0700 <gitcoin> More stats: The rise & rise of EIP 1559 Grant in the tech round https://t.co/Kq6vZyLc6a | 1 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1277597175753650177 2020-06-29 06:37:57 -0700 <iamDCinvestor> It's not hard to understand: Fee burning / EIP-1559 would take the unprecedented & growing demand to use Ethereum (observed through fees paid) and turn it into a fundamental value driver for ETH. This means possible price appreciation for ETH, and greater security for Ethereum. | 8 replies 21 retweets 150 likes | |
| 1277598934991503360 2020-06-29 06:44:57 -0700 <kartojal> Just funded EIP-1559 with 2 DAI, matching 115.18 DAI to the Community Fund grant. Feels great! #ethereum @gitcoin https://t.co/zZTMGWcUis | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1277599360151412737 2020-06-29 06:46:38 -0700 <CryptoCryptoNe3> Ethereum Community Raises Funds To Implement EIP-1559 CRYPTO CRYPTO NEWS - https://t.co/LBYOT4E9j6 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1277617826031779841 2020-06-29 08:00:01 -0700 <QuickNode> The @ethereum community crowdfunded 43 ETH and $16K in #DAI towards #EIP1559 for #Ethereum Improvement Proposal that aims at solving the issue of high transaction fees brought about by network congestion and erroneous large transaction fees inputted. https://t.co/sZNKJPqvGb https://t.co/FLVmUijHFf | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1277619371976908801 2020-06-29 08:06:09 -0700 <RyanSAdams> I just gave $500 to the EIP1559 grant I consider this a rational investment. I expect it to return 5-10x on my ETH after EIP1559 is successfully implemented If you are a citizen of the Ethereum Nation then make this investment with us Give $1 now 👇 https://t.co/vWt2uHhK90 | 10 replies 27 retweets 152 likes | |
| 1277624188979855361 2020-06-29 08:25:18 -0700 <chechuch1976> Now that fees in #Ethereum are growing and it is a problem for DeFi (present and near future) there are several ways to contribute to solve this. One is to help the #EIP1559 development as they are trying to solve this issue and balance the way the fees a… https://t.co/pMCloFPj9T | 0 replies 1 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1277624672696205312 2020-06-29 08:27:13 -0700 <GatheringGwei> @YellowBlock_io @CurveFinance @krakenfx L2 scaling coming quicker than most expected Future is looking bright, even without considerng ETH2 & EIP1559’s changes to the gas market The cool part is that the gains from sharding & L2 multiply together 🤠 https://t.co/EvbnIaAiow | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1277636202510745600 2020-06-29 09:13:02 -0700 <econoar> EIP-1559 Community Fund is now up to $60k in total funding. https://t.co/FJuOqM6ZMy | 4 replies 22 retweets 91 likes | |
| 1277651310305669122 2020-06-29 10:13:04 -0700 <TokenJay> Ethereum Developers Consider New Fee Model as Gas Costs Climb: With EIP 1559, Ethereum developers are proposing a dynamic pricing system to lower the blockchain network's current high gas fees. https://t.co/80jpTuevfk #Tech #Ethereum #EthereumMining https://t.co/3qcI34Ewtu | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1277652321879486465 2020-06-29 10:17:05 -0700 <roccodallas> Ethereum Developers Consider New Fee Model as Gas Costs Climb: With EIP 1559, Ethereum developers are proposing a dynamic pricing system to lower the blockchain network's current high gas fees. https://t.co/lPa2gJ9CVX #Tech #Ethereum #EthereumMining https://t.co/X5PWzXEC0K | 0 replies 1 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1277657175398256641 2020-06-29 10:36:22 -0700 <TimBeiko> @ph_lux @andrej_muzevic @realLedgerwatch I personally think EIP-1559 is less politically controversial, but harder technically, so the signal may be slightly better at convincing other core developers this is worth the technical lift, but, again, that's no guarantee. | 0 replies 0 retweets 13 likes | |
| 1277658451653599232 2020-06-29 10:41:27 -0700 <ccoinmarket> With EIP 1559, Ethereum developers are proposing a dynamic pricing system to lower the blockchain network's current high gas fees. "Ethereum Developers Consider New Fee Model as Gas Costs Climb" https://t.co/dlPTjMl5Z6 #Bitcoin #crypto | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1277659495263612928 2020-06-29 10:45:36 -0700 <AnettRolikova> This 🙌 The answer to why there's @gitcoin grant for EIP1559 | 1 replies 2 retweets 8 likes | |
| 1277660158437601281 2020-06-29 10:48:14 -0700 <adctrader> Ethereum Developers Consider New Fee Model as Gas Costs Climb https://t.co/9qbtwePepe #Crypto #CryptoFollower #share2steem #blockchain #Bitcoin #Ethereum #ETH #BTC #CoinDesk With EIP 1559, Ethereum developers are proposing a dynamic pricing system to lower the blockchain networ… | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1277660217522651138 2020-06-29 10:48:28 -0700 <webnowcompany> With EIP 1559, Ethereum developers are proposing a dynamic pricing system to lower the blockchain network's current high gas fees....Read more: https://t.co/SddkjaSNoa | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1277663661981609986 2020-06-29 11:02:09 -0700 <jennyclark20132> Ethereum Developers Consider New Fee Model as Gas Costs Climb With EIP 1559, Ethereum developers are proposing a dynamic pricing system to lower the blockchain network's current high gas fees. https://t.co/8npa7hQlUp | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1277669864287674368 2020-06-29 11:26:48 -0700 <MelissaBergmanz> #Ethereum Developers Consider New Fee Model as #Gas Costs Climb: With EIP 1559, Ethereum… https://t.co/QM678dAEcf | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1277672336024625152 2020-06-29 11:36:37 -0700 <RssBit> Ethereum Developers Consider New Fee Model as Gas Costs Climb With EIP 1559, Ethereum developers are proposing a dynamic pricing system to lower the blockchain network's current high gas fees. https://t.co/h6csOhwp5x | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1277686899037986816 2020-06-29 12:34:29 -0700 <BanklessHQ> Drop tribalism. Skip dogma. @hasufl is a free-thinker. He builds his crypto understanding from first principles. Enjoy this refreshing convo. Covered: - Why Bitcoin might not survive - How Maker is a central bank - Why EIP1559 is bullish ETH Listen: https://t.co/qhBtd85nTs | 1 replies 6 retweets 30 likes | |
| 1277688210508800001 2020-06-29 12:39:42 -0700 <TrustlessState> We had @hasufl on the @BanklessHQ to talk about some crucial themes current in crypto! - 'Body vs Spirit': Does the social contract of a system actually impact its manifestation? - Does a Bitcoin Standard break the Bitcoin Social Contract? - EIP 1559 https://t.co/Dn17VgFBpF | 1 replies 9 retweets 25 likes | |
| 1277689501255680000 2020-06-29 12:44:50 -0700 <CryptoCryptoNe3> Ethereum Community Raises Funds To Implement EIP-1559 CRYPTO CRYPTO NEWS - https://t.co/IuzENB1qlc | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1277704047840149505 2020-06-29 13:42:38 -0700 <joncursi> If #Ethereum adopts EIP1559, I think Ethereum will truly become the internet of value, with $ETH representing partial ownership of all things built on top. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1277713004268785664 2020-06-29 14:18:13 -0700 <spengrah> @auryn_macmillan @LefterisJP @JHancock @gitcoin i.e. somebody could create a "solutions to high gas fee" project, and then all funds contributed and matched for that project would become the matching pool for a CLR instance. Solution projects like EIP-1559 and EIP-2593 could then register for and get funding from that instance | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1277727623288958976 2020-06-29 15:16:19 -0700 <hasufl> @galloway_the @iamDCinvestor I agree with the thread as I'm also strongly opposed to raising the gas limit as well as giving miners the power to make that decision in the first place. But where's the connection to EIP-1559? | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1277728907941351424 2020-06-29 15:21:25 -0700 <hasufl> @galloway_the @iamDCinvestor Yes, they are the same. But EIP-1559 is independent of that, it simply enforces a block gas limit that someone else chose. In its current form, miners can choose the target block gas limit the same way they can today, so nothing changes. | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1277732010925178881 2020-06-29 15:33:45 -0700 <gweicz> Skvely newsletter, tentokrat popisujici co prinese upgrade Etherea : EIP-1559 - lepsi UX (basefee), paleni fees a dalsi... | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1277732762405892098 2020-06-29 15:36:44 -0700 <sassal0x> @K_mpec80 A good write-up of an alternative proposal that aims to address EIP-1559's shortcomings is below. In general, I think the main worry is that the 'tip' functionality would just revert the fee market back to what it is today. https://t.co/fHccmAN5SF | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1277741144475152385 2020-06-29 16:10:02 -0700 <CriptoNoticias> EIP-1559 básicamente busca reemplazar el modelo actual al ajustar la tarifa base de acuerdo a la demanda de la red. Con EIP-1559 se envía una única oferta de comisión por transacción⚙️⛓👇 #Ethereum #blockchain #ETH https://t.co/YvpqQCUVe3 | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1277744710115905538 2020-06-29 16:24:12 -0700 <eudyzerpa> EIP-1559 básicamente busca reemplazar el modelo actual al ajustar la tarifa base de acuerdo a la demanda de la red. Con EIP-1559 se envía una única oferta de comisión por transacción⚙️⛓👇 #Ethereum #blockchain #ETH https://t.co/NTs8s9q8Bp | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1277746985215438848 2020-06-29 16:33:15 -0700 <franzvan> Escalator y EIP-1559: propuestas combinadas para bajar las comisiones de Ethereum https://t.co/OqsHghZhrJ | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1277750802560413696 2020-06-29 16:48:25 -0700 <econoar> EthHub Weekly #119 Livestream: -EIP-1559 community fund on @gitcoin -PlusToken ETH on the move -Eth2 updates -@BalancerLabs launches BAL token -ArchiveNode launches -@ChainLinkGod risk appetite spectrum for DeFi -5 contrarian takes by @DegenSpartan https://t.co/rIdi2tZSMj | 3 replies 11 retweets 53 likes | |
| 1277768003002806272 2020-06-29 17:56:46 -0700 <TheCoinRadar_> New post: The 1.x Files: EIP 1559 and the Ethereum Improvement Horizon https://t.co/HAltkjt0TU | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1277771530684919810 2020-06-29 18:10:47 -0700 <PJusername> @econoar EIP-1559 appears to be a massive value proposition for ETH. Why aren't the whales funding the shit out of this? | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1277776758515744768 2020-06-29 18:31:33 -0700 <sassal0x> A cool thing about the EIP-1559 Community Fund on @gitcoin is that is acts as a way for community members (currently 297 of them) to *signal* support for 1559 with as little as 1 DAI. Additionally, Gitcoin is probably the best anti-sybil platform for this sort of stuff atm. https://t.co/rZXpn7cuPN | 4 replies 7 retweets 51 likes | |
| 1277777592599187456 2020-06-29 18:34:52 -0700 <sassal0x> @RydesaurusRex @gitcoin What makes it a "vital EIP"? There are issues with EIP-1559 that need to be researched to be further understood + not all developers are currently being paid for their work (the Vulcanize team being one of them). | 0 replies 0 retweets 6 likes | |
| 1277786378244255744 2020-06-29 19:09:47 -0700 <0xTycoon> @R_Tyler_Smith Agreed! Although I'd argue we don't need ETH 2.0 to take us to $1000 when we have have zkRollups available right now! ETH 2.0 phase 2 & EIP1559 may take to $10k 🤩 | 0 replies 0 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1277791286267908113 2020-06-29 19:29:17 -0700 <BestEvolve> The 1.x Files: EIP 1559 and the Ethereum Improvement Horizon https://t.co/Ao4agQU8q4 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1277800769228427264 2020-06-29 20:06:58 -0700 <precyz> "So what's needed for the next order of magnitude growth in users and network effects?" Why Ari Paul thinks upgrades like EIP 1559 are make or break for #Ethereum ♦️ | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1277818150273179648 2020-06-29 21:16:02 -0700 <htcexodus> An #Ethereum technical proposal called EIP-1559 will help address high fees by implementing a dynamic pricing system. If implemented, those that want to transact $ETH would pay the “base fee” to the network and a tip to miners. https://t.co/Tl95lt9DQL | 0 replies 1 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1277821099229634561 2020-06-29 21:27:45 -0700 <leokcheng> Help support these fantastic projects via @gitcoin grants today: @Meta_Cartel @wizardofdapps @MetaFam @RaidGuild @metagammadelta @PocketMoloch/@nowdaoit @lex_DAO @DAOSquare @1up_world @TheMetaFactory @Collab_Land_ @commonsstack @abridged_io EIP-1559, and Gitcoin itself. | 3 replies 1 retweets 24 likes | |
| 1277850592002662402 2020-06-29 23:24:57 -0700 <pcaversaccio> Interesting development: #Ethereum developers liked the idea of the #EIP 2593 so much that it is likely to be used in addition to EIP 1559 as a tweak to the latter’s "tipping" feature. https://t.co/iNUh48gFA2 | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1277851713903435776 2020-06-29 23:29:24 -0700 <BestEvolve> Ethereum Community Raises Funds To Implement EIP-1559 https://t.co/XkdiFKFLPo | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1277873410157223937 2020-06-30 00:55:37 -0700 <marioablancoa> EIP-1559 básicamente busca reemplazar el modelo actual al ajustar la tarifa base de acuerdo a la demanda de la red. Con EIP-1559 se envía una única oferta de comisión por transacción⚙️⛓👇 #Ethereum #blockchain #ETH https://t.co/buE3xjIKMF EIP-1559 básicamente busca reemplaz… | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1277886874040897536 2020-06-30 01:49:07 -0700 <Crypto_n_derivs> My vid on #EIP1559 which is closer than you think. #Ethereum fees have reached stupid levels. The #ETH improvement proposal will help a bit but it sneaks in massive deflationary fee burn mechanism much earlier than expected Lower fees and number go up! https://t.co/DkgrqoJVgT | 2 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1277897298069147648 2020-06-30 02:30:32 -0700 <j6sp5r> I know it sounds old and lame and maximalist. But high transaction cost DOES increase the pressure to innovate (2nd layer, roll-ups, sharding, EIP1559, ...) #Ethereum | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1277952690845134848 2020-06-30 06:10:39 -0700 <ETHPlanet> @TokenPocket_TP EIP 1559 👀 https://t.co/Uf3BqoY9ku | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1277965271127322624 2020-06-30 07:00:38 -0700 <sassal0x> @cburniske And with EIP-1559 there's a high chance that we'll eventually get to net negative issuance for Ethereum :) https://t.co/hyAvKogKiY | 0 replies 1 retweets 11 likes | |
| 1277975725648130056 2020-06-30 07:42:11 -0700 <4Tendies> @TypicalIndian12 @divinewind95 @VitalikButerin We are actually moving towards zero issuance with eip 1559 and staking. It will be closer to zero percent than bitcoin. But please keep talking | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1277983011166969857 2020-06-30 08:11:08 -0700 <TimBeiko> .@MessariCrypto shout of for the EIP-1559 grant 👀 https://t.co/dEuoSomdxT All sounds right, aside from the number of contributors, which is now over 300 😁 https://t.co/JdHVPHSW5c | 1 replies 0 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1277991993436758021 2020-06-30 08:46:49 -0700 <DecredDragon> I read the DeFi news and $ETH updates for PoS transition and EIP 1559 .. but at the eod, I just buy more $DCR. Feels more secure. ✊🏻 $DCR | 1 replies 1 retweets 23 likes | |
| 1277992423868600322 2020-06-30 08:48:32 -0700 <LUKACACIC> @scott_lew_is EIP 1559 ASAP | 1 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1278003690868105216 2020-06-30 09:33:18 -0700 <econoar> EthHub Weekly #120 -EIP-1559 community fund on @gitcoin -PlusToken ETH on the move -Eth2 updates -@BalancerLabs launches BAL token -ArchiveNode launches -@ChainLinkGod risk appetite spectrum for DeFi -5 contrarian takes by @DegenSpartan https://t.co/7dzLK6HlSf | 1 replies 10 retweets 25 likes | |
| 1278004689171296256 2020-06-30 09:37:16 -0700 <veliko_test3> EthHub Weekly #120: EIP-1559 community fund, PlusToken ETH on the move, Eth2 updates, Balancer BAL token goes live, ArchiveNode launches, risk appetite spectrum for DeFi and 5 contrarian takes by @DegenSpartan https://t.co/TdbAXZ5gGy | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1278009865508737037 2020-06-30 09:57:50 -0700 <cryptow1re> reddit 🤖: EthHub Weekly #120: EIP-1559 community fund, PlusToken ETH on the move, Eth2 updates, Balancer BAL token go... https://t.co/bfqYeYOmy5 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1278039507858870275 2020-06-30 11:55:38 -0700 <Hazelstar_> I'm late to the party, but that doesn't mean I don't care! Showed some 💜/💰 to 10 grants today on @gitcoin Grants: - @rotkiapp - @paraswap - @BanklessHQ - @mintbase - @DefiantNews - @TrustlessState - @DeFi_Dad - @defiprime - @BlackGirlsCode - EIP-1559 Community Fund ✊🏽 | 8 replies 7 retweets 24 likes | |
| 1278049674532880386 2020-06-30 12:36:02 -0700 <FigoETH> According to current progess #Ethereum will have the following properties in 2021: Scalability will reach 100k+ tps while remaining decentralized PoS with FFG will make ETH much more secure EIP 1559 will be live strengthening the value proposition of ETH | 3 replies 14 retweets 45 likes | |
| 1278062501188509702 2020-06-30 13:27:00 -0700 <jadler0> @PhABCD @twigwam Actually not a bad explainer of EIP-1559. Good job @MicahZoltu. Also, who says "nanoeth" jeeze. | 0 replies 0 retweets 7 likes | |
| 1278062924901343232 2020-06-30 13:28:41 -0700 <das_grasshopper> @marcomu_ Yo creo sería muy bueno hablar de Rollups en Ethereum, y también de EIP1559 para todo lo que se viene este año en escalabilidad en la red actual 1.x https://t.co/R8EiNewqP7 | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1278068832016490500 2020-06-30 13:52:09 -0700 <VitalikButerin> The original paper from 2018 that introduced EIP 1559: https://t.co/eav6Y1MtIR | 18 replies 65 retweets 242 likes | |
| 1278070389952954368 2020-06-30 13:58:21 -0700 <Blox_Staking> For everyone talking about EIP 1559... 💳 💰 | 0 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1278070405840998402 2020-06-30 13:58:24 -0700 <PredictionsExch> @nickbaes79 Idk when EIP-1559 goes live, but PoS is prob the more meaningful one here since it's direct revenue to token holders | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1278100707204358144 2020-06-30 15:58:49 -0700 <EthWinterfell> Ethereum tx fees last 30 days are 90k ETH, 60k without the 2 crazy transactions. That's 750k ETH every year, much more than the expected PoS issuance. With POS and EIP 1559, ETH can have negative supply growth! @econoar @sassal0x @Ethereum_CN | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1278184907676639232 2020-06-30 21:33:24 -0700 <Gargant34260060> @DeFiDude Yes 💯 agreed- Eg the eip1559 why haven’t any big players stepped up and supported | 0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1278246961741627392 2020-07-01 01:39:59 -0700 <0xTycoon> @danfinlay @Crypto_JoeRogan @VitalikButerin Btw, this is also addressed in the EIP1559 FAQ under the title "Won’t miners have the incentive to collude to push down the BASEFEE by making all their blocks less than half full?" https://t.co/x5fkosDpCD | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1278269667711188993 2020-07-01 03:10:12 -0700 <0xTycoon> @Cryptocito @kyled116 @sassal0x The gas would be burned, i.e. removed from the supply, making ETH more scarce. At the same time it addresses the "economic abstraction" problem. Meanwhile the UX enhancement is mainly a positive side effect of EIP1559. | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1278287563694977027 2020-07-01 04:21:19 -0700 <Danamin14> Is EIP 1559 “Make or Break” for Ethereum’s Future? https://t.co/ilKVasWuwy | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1278288526531088385 2020-07-01 04:25:08 -0700 <FxBookLTTG> https://t.co/eqKLpJRWl3 Is EIP 1559 “Make or Break” for Ethereum’s Future? | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1278297561238028289 2020-07-01 05:01:02 -0700 <desktrading> Is EIP 1559 “Make or Break” for Ethereum’s Future? - Finance Magnates https://t.co/ccIjlodmUv | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1278297647082876930 2020-07-01 05:01:23 -0700 <BobaBonanza> @graemeblackwood @alistairmilne this chart ignores the effect that EIP 1559 will bring | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1278298325004025857 2020-07-01 05:04:04 -0700 <0xEther> The last bastion of $ETH price irrationality falls with EIP-1559. https://t.co/o1aCQ7Rlmx | 1 replies 5 retweets 17 likes | |
| 1278304272120233984 2020-07-01 05:27:42 -0700 <wcryptocongress> Is EIP 1559 “Make or Break” for Ethereum's Future?: Ethereum Improvement Proposal 1559 may contain some critical changes to the Ethereum network. https://t.co/HzutRapQFN #wcc2020 #worldcryptonomiccongress #worldcryptonomicfoundation #gameplancapital https://t.co/bfbCNcZNSO | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1278304482921787392 2020-07-01 05:28:33 -0700 <BTCstJournal> Is EIP 1559 “Make or Break” for Ethereum’s Future? https://t.co/11j2Io3n7f #bitcoin @crypto_discuss https://t.co/DzFqEISFK3 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1278304737482338306 2020-07-01 05:29:33 -0700 <0xTycoon> #EIP1559 fixes this! | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1278309580435599360 2020-07-01 05:48:48 -0700 <QuantDatalytika> Is EIP 1559 “Make or Break” for Ethereum’s Future? https://t.co/WnByHbB6n2 #cryptotrading #binaryoptions | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1278309832823656449 2020-07-01 05:49:48 -0700 <trdrmtscdr> Is EIP 1559 “Make or Break” for Ethereum’s Future? https://t.co/BDlHmJlGSk | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1278312109835722757 2020-07-01 05:58:51 -0700 <cryptow1re> reddit 🤖: Is EIP 1559 “Make or Break” for Ethereum’s Future? https://t.co/5jK2R1BX5J | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1278312243214639106 2020-07-01 05:59:23 -0700 <cryptow1re> #ethtrader 🤖: Is EIP 1559 “Make or Break” for Ethereum’s Future? https://t.co/Is8BcUlOpp | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1278312481195163648 2020-07-01 06:00:20 -0700 <defivc> Is EIP 1559 “Make or Break” for Ethereum’s Future? https://t.co/ifTi51F8Xv #ethereum | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1278313159456104454 2020-07-01 06:03:01 -0700 <financemagnates> Is EIP 1559 “make or break” for Ethereum’s future? https://t.co/WVxi1V3Bxm #ethereum #ETH https://t.co/x7rpMRgkV5 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1278316569249153027 2020-07-01 06:16:34 -0700 <AguluNwoke> Is EIP 1559 “Make or Break” for Ethereum’s Future? https://t.co/yxRohTDoeR | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1278317444650561536 2020-07-01 06:20:03 -0700 <coindeskkorea> 7/1 오후브리핑: 이더리움 수수료 개선안, 삼성SDS: 이더리움 “높은 거래 수수료 낮출 새로운 수수료 모델 고려”최근 이더리움의 높은 수수료가 문제로 등장하면서 채굴 수수료 방식을 변경하는 '이더리움 개선제안서(EIP) 1559 코드'가 주목받고 있다. 이더리움 이용자들이… https://t.co/VOwQgVgSJc https://t.co/LSkATQCKoY | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1278320421360726018 2020-07-01 06:31:53 -0700 <sassal0x> The EIP-1559 grant on @gitcoin caused quite a stir in the Ethereum community over the last few days. In today's piece, I give a summary of the events and arguments/discussions that were had. Read 👇 https://t.co/gahe08UwPi | 1 replies 6 retweets 21 likes | |
| 1278342176200589313 2020-07-01 07:58:19 -0700 <myfxinfocom> Is EIP 1559 “Make or Break” for Ethereum’s Future? https://t.co/Q6iRktKxdB | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1278363224342052864 2020-07-01 09:21:58 -0700 <OliviaLovenmark> Is EIP 1559 "make or break"? I don't think so. But it would improve #Ethereum's monetary policy w a deflationary mechanism, make gas fees more efficient, lessen txn costs & improve overall UX. Thx for including me @RachelMcInt0sh https://t.co/F1TxUW2DLZ cc @AriDavidPaul @OKCoin | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1278373009607147522 2020-07-01 10:00:51 -0700 <TakeoWT> Take a deep dive into EIP 1559, the proposal from Etehreum developers to combat rising (Eth) gas fees. Great insights from @OliviaLovenmark #ethereum #eth #crypto | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1278374539785732096 2020-07-01 10:06:55 -0700 <SpartanBlack_1> @younieyounie2 That is not to say that $ETH is not a good investment, but it seems the drivers for $ETH are more related to ETH2.0 and EIP-1559 progress than direct correlation with DeFi. So if you want DeFi exposure the perp or individual tokens are a better bet. | 2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1278380884383666178 2020-07-01 10:32:08 -0700 <FigoETH> @QWQiao With increasing usage more ETH got burned when EIP 1559 is burned. Also when DeFi usage increases more ETH is locked up as collateral. Both leading to reduced / burned supply, making ETH more scarce. This is different to silver, isn't it? | 1 replies 1 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1278384041985748993 2020-07-01 10:44:41 -0700 <taha_zafar12> @purugyl @RyanSAdams @KyberNetwork @PrestonPysh I dont think that you understood that my post was in reference to your "centralized authority" argument, mate. Soon, the inflation rate of Ethereum would be lesser than Bitcoin, because of Eth2.0 and EIP 1559 proposals. If scarcity is the only argument, then its not much. | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1278384953999282182 2020-07-01 10:48:18 -0700 <purugyl> @taha_zafar12 @RyanSAdams @KyberNetwork @PrestonPysh See, BTC doesn't need something similar to ETH2.0 and EIP1559 to change the monetary policy. You should read The Bitcoin Standard, highly recommend it. BTC is currency, ETH is the protocol layer, finance would be automated maybe via BTC wrapped on ETH or elsewise. @APompliano | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1278389019433414657 2020-07-01 11:04:28 -0700 <tokenstate> @zooko @davidiach @Fiskantes @renprotocol @DefiantNews @0x_Lucas @CamiRusso If fees were micro & ETH was used as global settlement layer the base currency would still be worth trillions. There's also staking & EIP-1559 which is better than fixed supply can ever be. Shear demand > fixed supply Also, BTC isn't sustainable. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1278410426837897216 2020-07-01 12:29:32 -0700 <myetherwallet> Do you think there should be a better solution for gas fees on Ethereum, from the users' perspective? Could EIP 1559 become part of that solution? If you're not sure what we're talking about, check out this article and share your thoughts ⤵️ https://t.co/sJQHxaSvIw | 1 replies 2 retweets 9 likes | |
| 1278416102125522945 2020-07-01 12:52:05 -0700 <danielpsegundo> @RyanSAdams Patiently waiting for staking and EIP-1559 to be implemented... | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1278424929889685504 2020-07-01 13:27:09 -0700 <edmundedgar> @twobitidiot Attack profitability is related to the value of the assets *moving* not their total value at rest, if there were no transactions a reorg wouldn't do anything. PS value moved tends to correlate with fee revenue, this is why burning fees a la EIP1559 is probably unwise | 2 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1278431998131032070 2020-07-01 13:55:15 -0700 <hasufl> @JeremyRubin @twobitidiot FWIW, economic abstraction of ETH for txn fees (though not necessarily as a monetary asset) is made impossible by EIP-1559 | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1278437810379333633 2020-07-01 14:18:20 -0700 <callam99> https://t.co/iQnBPz7Dex Evening job done! Added funding to EIP-1559, thanks to the daily gwei project for highlighting its importance https://t.co/n1MIGPj6yc | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1278451917849538568 2020-07-01 15:14:24 -0700 <stellarmagnet> @MarkBeylin I think a mix of all... the EIP 1559 grant has definitely upped the bar as far as number of contributors needed to get a meaningful match... the last round I think if you had about 50 contributors you were matched a couple thousand, but now that gets more like a couple hundred? | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1278486422920368128 2020-07-01 17:31:31 -0700 <0xTycoon> @danfinlay @Crypto_JoeRogan @VitalikButerin That's a good question, one that would need to asked in the modeling/analysis of EIP-1559. Asking at what threshold it's more profitable to collude, does it change any selfish mining dynamics, risks for miners colluding. Also, define what "almost everyone" means in the FAQ. 😀 | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1278501104767119362 2020-07-01 18:29:51 -0700 <CryptoCryptoNe3> Ethereum Infochain: Is EIP 1559 “Make or Break” for Ethereum’s Future? CRYPTO CRYPTO NEWS - https://t.co/1OhTyoplT7 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1278510841998893056 2020-07-01 19:08:32 -0700 <SwiftXAgency> Is EIP 1559 “Make or Break” for Ethereum’s Future? https://t.co/LOnM7CbdLb https://t.co/Q9Y0egEHNu | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1278518778108624902 2020-07-01 19:40:05 -0700 <PJusername> @0xstark @sassal0x @ethereum @coinmetrics EIP1559 ftw! | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1278534685430214656 2020-07-01 20:43:17 -0700 <TheCryptoLark> @bittrio @sassal0x the economic model is different, yes, but dig your head in a bit more, staking, ice age, eip 1559. | 0 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1278577489321713664 2020-07-01 23:33:22 -0700 <elusivechad> @lastmjs Yeah, total fees collected over the course of a year and multiplied by 3-5. Due to the burn, I believe when EIP 1559 goes in the price of ETH will be very directly tied to the annual cost of L1 use for projects. The price can fluctuate, but I think it will be tied to burn rate. | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1278586320336621569 2020-07-02 00:08:28 -0700 <primetechfin> Is EIP 1559 “Make or Break” for Ethereum’s Future? Ethereum Improvement Proposal 1559 may contain some critical changes to the Ethereum network. https://t.co/1dGnOSqcOP | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1278607980544454657 2020-07-02 01:34:32 -0700 <makEitevAn> Is EIP 1559 “Make or Break” for Ethereum’s Future? https://t.co/TYDewL8ylT https://t.co/YqSWdZ5ott | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1278607981848879105 2020-07-02 01:34:32 -0700 <OHMar_s41nt> Is EIP 1559 “Make or Break” for Ethereum’s Future? https://t.co/k39T3dfXoI https://t.co/RR83EQTIeN | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1278607982117269504 2020-07-02 01:34:32 -0700 <maderpotter> Is EIP 1559 “Make or Break” for Ethereum’s Future? https://t.co/LdRfdUyO3Q https://t.co/piqjBBu9sN | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1278607982180184064 2020-07-02 01:34:32 -0700 <ElliotParisi> Is EIP 1559 “Make or Break” for Ethereum’s Future? https://t.co/SG3FfTp7Ex https://t.co/vqV7mY66HK | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1278607982184419334 2020-07-02 01:34:32 -0700 <faded_morty> Is EIP 1559 “Make or Break” for Ethereum’s Future? https://t.co/zT9YAlomCk https://t.co/iyPeEyOVtE | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1278607982280896514 2020-07-02 01:34:33 -0700 <archduke_katou> Is EIP 1559 “Make or Break” for Ethereum’s Future? https://t.co/jIXzLrRMb8 https://t.co/UlTV1zYaej | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1278607984801660928 2020-07-02 01:34:33 -0700 <FrabellJanina> Is EIP 1559 “Make or Break” for Ethereum’s Future? https://t.co/2EgKw8wgr5 https://t.co/xQSl3QyNaK | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1278613266407649282 2020-07-02 01:55:32 -0700 <midn9trader> Is EIP 1559 “Make or Break” for Ethereum’s Future? https://t.co/oAKz3BsL5c https://t.co/uqLOXxkf7y | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1278616288240136193 2020-07-02 02:07:33 -0700 <algogarden> Is EIP 1559 “Make or Break” for Ethereum’s Future? https://t.co/X1NXbAPUlh https://t.co/ADHwOMFwab | 0 replies 2 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1278633545397829633 2020-07-02 03:16:07 -0700 <NewsLynchburg> Is EIP 1559 "Make or Break" for Ethereum's Future? #Ethereum #blockchain via https://t.co/6vMl5HvR4J https://t.co/E8Pqsx0Ihm | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1278650673349853184 2020-07-02 04:24:11 -0700 <offworldertrade> @donar @ethereum pretty amped about eth2 and the implementation of EIP-1559. def the exact opposite of an ethereum hater! | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1278676977499738112 2020-07-02 06:08:42 -0700 <flash_espanol> ¿Será la propuesta EIP 1559 un momento de hacer o deshacer para Ethereum (ETH)? #eth #ethereum https://t.co/t1uk0ViCe8 | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1278684390428721153 2020-07-02 06:38:10 -0700 <FlashDeutsch> Wird der Vorschlag EIP 1559 für Ethereum (ETH) ein "make or break it moment" sein? #eth #ethereum https://t.co/DyHbjjb95G | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1278685916396163072 2020-07-02 06:44:13 -0700 <NewsFrancais> La proposition EIP 1559 sera-t-elle un moment décisif pour Ethereum (ETH)? #eth #ethereum https://t.co/uIU06st0G0 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1278690152316047365 2020-07-02 07:01:03 -0700 <desktrading> Will proposal EIP 1559 be a make or break it moment for Ethereum (ETH)? - Crypto News Flash https://t.co/H40ppGvD38 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1278698799305830402 2020-07-02 07:35:25 -0700 <fundswift> New post (Will EIP 1559 be a make or break it moment for Ethereum (ETH)?) has been published on FUNDSWIFT - https://t.co/HIFMd2LWEl https://t.co/tALx92XTZj | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1278708615369670659 2020-07-02 08:14:25 -0700 <cryptos4ever> Will EIP 1559 be a make or break moment for Ethereum? #crypto #blockchain #altcoins #ethereum #eth https://t.co/3SwB2cangl | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1278720426072555521 2020-07-02 09:01:21 -0700 <9vest> Will EIP 1559 be a make or break minute for Ethereum? https://t.co/P6f2XTx0hj | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1278722446116388867 2020-07-02 09:09:23 -0700 <FigoETH> Fallacy in this argument: High usage of Ethereum leads to it's aspiration as global settlement layer. This settlement layer is secured by the value of ETH, being a SoV due to - EIP 1559 - Defi lockup - PoS staking All this isn't true for stablecoins. | 1 replies 5 retweets 12 likes | |
| 1278735234427740160 2020-07-02 10:00:12 -0700 <Danamin14> Will EIP 1559 be a make or break moment for Ethereum? https://t.co/c52CnAsrY0 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1278742575730634753 2020-07-02 10:29:22 -0700 <BestEvolve> Ethereum EIP-1559 Will Be A Make Or Break Moment For ETH https://t.co/pHugMb4HmZ | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1278751154109808641 2020-07-02 11:03:27 -0700 <P2Pvalidator> 💫 6. EIP-1559 work: EIP-1559 Community Fund https://t.co/m7ZiBjUsy5 | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1278754101694738433 2020-07-02 11:15:10 -0700 <Fiskantes> @mattigags @MaciekLaskus Btw being long Ethereum ecosystem = holding not only ETH but also providing liquidity, yield farming, holding DeFi tokens...at least til staking and EIP1559 | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1278758483568005125 2020-07-02 11:32:35 -0700 <lpham2011> @RyanSAdams @RyanWatkins_ Stablecoins are a peg and BTC is a store of value. Cryto dollars are a threat cause it impacts demand for Eth on its on ecosystem. Ethereum 2.0 will fix the supply side and EIP 1559 will fix the demand side. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1278771937578070016 2020-07-02 12:26:03 -0700 <AYF_AI> Is EIP 1559 “Make or Break” for Ethereum’s Future?: For many, the beauty of blockchain is its immutable nature: blockchain networks are created and upheld through… https://t.co/HSfrj8GLer #artificialintelligence #ai #tech #internetofthings #technology #dataanalytics #ml #coding https://t.co/Ch6gd9Zuwt | 0 replies 2 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1278779731152965632 2020-07-02 12:57:01 -0700 <ScienceNFTs> @FintechJero @MessariCrypto Agreed on a utility front, but not for $ETH valuation. Not sure based on current emission from miners that we are increasing scarcity, thus driving up price based on gas demand. That's why EIP-1559 is so critical to $ETH's value prop. | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1278782232300314629 2020-07-02 13:06:57 -0700 <ScienceNFTs> @FintechJero @MessariCrypto @TrustlessState Agreed. @BanklessHQ also just pushed a podcast with @hasufl where they talk about EIP-1559 at the end, a really good listen. Overall, I think you are correct though. Definitely more usage on $ETH which is bullish - just gets muddy when $ETH valuation comes into the equation. 😊 | 1 replies 2 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1278786284853407744 2020-07-02 13:23:03 -0700 <precyz> @CryptoEcon_Li @LefterisJP @realLedgerwatch @koeppelmann It should because of higher transaction throughput -> less competition for blockspace. Also, the fee market should become more efficient once EIP 1559 is implemented. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1278828223564922880 2020-07-02 16:09:42 -0700 <iDecentralized> @blcurley Temporarily, one could argue it's parasitic until EIP 1559 get's activated. I don't necessarily agree with that argument, in the case of LINK. | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1278828606932897802 2020-07-02 16:11:14 -0700 <blcurley> @iDecentralized What affect will EIP 1559 have? | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1278829712899481606 2020-07-02 16:15:37 -0700 <TheCoinRadar_> New post: The 1.x Files: EIP 1559 and the Ethereum Improvement Horizon https://t.co/HAltkjt0TU | 0 replies 1 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1278850807920803840 2020-07-02 17:39:27 -0700 <CryptoCryptoNe3> Ethereum EIP-1559 Will Be A Make Or Break Moment For ETH CRYPTO CRYPTO NEWS - https://t.co/JEQL0kyUV9 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1278886462864277504 2020-07-02 20:01:07 -0700 <fx_plus> イーサリアム、手数料高騰でEIP1559に対する期待が高まる #仮想通貨 - https://t.co/E1FgZhkkOw | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1278948099910561793 2020-07-03 00:06:03 -0700 <nakajo> 最近 EIP1559の議論が活発なのはやっぱり、gas priceの高騰も受けてなのかなぁ。 元々の提案が、エコシステムに対しての利益とgasPriceに相関性がないことを是正しようっていう提案だし。。。。 | 0 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1278968291353124864 2020-07-03 01:26:17 -0700 <cryptotesters> We just funded a couple of our favourite projects in the Ethereum space. @TornadoCash 👋 @zapper_fi 🚀 @WalletConnect 📲 @1inchExchange 🧪 @prylabs 💰 @sassal0x 🇦🇺 @DeFi_Dad 🧪 @ethersjs 💪 BUT most importantly 25 DAI to the EIP-1559 Community Fund bc ETH is 💸💯 | 4 replies 15 retweets 44 likes | |
| 1278976337273815041 2020-07-03 01:58:15 -0700 <AnettRolikova> My super last minute contribution on @gitcoin goes to following grants: Tech: ether.js @ricmoo Turbo-Geth @realLedgerwatch Nethermind @tkstanczak @etherchain_org @TenderlyApp Community: @EthCatHerders EIP-1559 @TimBeiko @DeFi_Dad News: @benjaminion_xyz @sassal0x ✨🤗 | 4 replies 7 retweets 41 likes | |
| 1278999193491607552 2020-07-03 03:29:05 -0700 <TechFishNews> Ethereum Developers Consider New Fee Model as Gas Costs Climb: With EIP 1559, Ethereum developers are proposing a dynamic pricing system to lower the blockchain network's current high gas fees. https://t.co/IqHrpQWDXN #news #technews #technology https://t.co/r5P0ksyIfu | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1279067433484070914 2020-07-03 08:00:14 -0700 <Okcoin> Last week @RachelMcInt0sh published a @financemagnates article addressing a hot topic: will EIP 1559 make or break #Ethereum? (loosely quoting @AriDavidPaul) Here's Rachel's analysis with thoughts from our @OliviaLovenmark: https://t.co/lXCUcInatH $ETH | 0 replies 1 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1279104373646168064 2020-07-03 10:27:01 -0700 <EthereumCN> The 1.x Files: EIP 1559 and the Ethereum Improvement Horizon ETH1.X：EIP1559与以太坊改良之路 Chinese Read👉👉👉 https://t.co/9WXAducizK Posted by Griffin Ichiba Hotchkiss @gichiba https://t.co/X93vFoldTm | 0 replies 1 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1279128902489669632 2020-07-03 12:04:30 -0700 <ChainLinkGod> @haydenzadams This is kinda misleading, gas fee burning (EIP-1559) is not yet live yet, so that's the amount of fees paid to miners, not burnt | 1 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1279143074397138944 2020-07-03 13:00:48 -0700 <das_grasshopper> This is a good article about the possible protocol upgrade, and fix the Ethereum fee market, making it more efficient. I support this, and I hope to see it implemented this year. @econoar good job Eric! “Fixing the Ethereum Fee Market (EIP-1559)” https://t.co/QcKhMMh0mF | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1279160696849104896 2020-07-03 14:10:50 -0700 <DeFi_Dad> This included: @epnsproject EIP1559 @OurNetwork__ @mintbase @iearnfinance @paraswap @token_smart @EthCatHerders @podsfinan @austingriffith @fuellab @ethmag @ETHBerlin @msolomon44's Umbra @wearekickback @vyperlang | 1 replies 0 retweets 7 likes | |
| 1279178939961876482 2020-07-03 15:23:19 -0700 <the_ethernaut> @vittominacori @UniswapProtocol @ETHGasStation @etherscan 2/ * Gas price is basically a tip tou give to miners. Since so many txs are trying to make into a block, you have to bid higher for your tx to be mined. * There is a lot of work being done to solve this: layer 2 solutions like zk rollups, eip 1559, the whole of Eth 2.0, ... | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1279213477240987653 2020-07-03 17:40:34 -0700 <4Tendies> @RichardHeartWin @gitcoin @owocki @VitalikButerin Lol nice. Makes the 10 bucks I donated to eip 1559 look like peanuts 😂 | 0 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1279244878795476992 2020-07-03 19:45:20 -0700 <das_grasshopper> @muellerberndt ETH 1.x on rollups: about 2,000tps with EIP1559 ETH 2.0: 64 shards, each one with the capacity of ETH 1.x, so it will be about 128,000tps. I'd say that's enough to become the logical layer of the IoT and the M2M payment platform of 2025 and beyond 🔥✌️ | 1 replies 1 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1279267503856914432 2020-07-03 21:15:15 -0700 <TheCoinRadar_> New post: The 1.x Files: EIP 1559 and the Ethereum Improvement Horizon https://t.co/HAltkjt0TU | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1279274570743197696 2020-07-03 21:43:20 -0700 <DeFiDaJo> @tbr90 @antiprosynth With POS & eip-1559 net eth issuance can go negative while maintaining stronger security & economic models over btc it’s hardcap. | 0 replies 1 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1279425261306609665 2020-07-04 07:42:07 -0700 <patentlyGerman> @Stan_Kladko ...what would change with implementation of EIP 1559 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1279526499851403264 2020-07-04 14:24:24 -0700 <MapleLeafCap> (1) ETH is a digital commodity today powers and secures transactions and code execution, much like water powering watermills as a “recyclable” resource. EIP-1559, much like alchemy, transforms ETH from water to be more like oil. https://t.co/cORbVwbm8K | 4 replies 6 retweets 52 likes | |
| 1279586870746402816 2020-07-04 18:24:18 -0700 <richardchen39> "ETH is a digital commodity today powers and secures transactions and code execution, much like water powering watermills as a “recyclable” resource. EIP-1559, much like alchemy, transforms ETH from water to be more like oil." https://t.co/rjJTARubc5 | 0 replies 1 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1279705541376344064 2020-07-05 02:15:51 -0700 <SCBuergel> I'm all-in on #Ethereum🚀 Reality check though - these charts are NOT a moon case for $ETH: Daily fees of 0.5m (~180m annually) even at 10x multiple, "just" justify a 1.8bn valuation, not 25bn 🤔 The 🌕 case is: ETH used as DeFi collateral burned via EIP1559 staked in ETH2 | 4 replies 1 retweets 17 likes | |
| 1279705543972728832 2020-07-05 02:15:52 -0700 <SCBuergel> This also explains why big bag holders are more focused than the developers on EIP1559, ETH2 or lobbying for ETH as the primary token for everything Disclaimer: I do hold some ETH, but to me Ethereum is first and foremost the most amazing technology of my lifetime 😘 | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1279722212199739392 2020-07-05 03:22:06 -0700 <unvalueable2111> 3)The Ethereum EIP-1559 will increase the security of Ethereum 4).Introducing DerivaDEX: perpetual swap derivatives exchange, order book based, transparent off-chain | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1279804197299421184 2020-07-05 08:47:52 -0700 <MapleLeafCap> @cryptodigitals I think my view on $ETH is really nuanced. EIP1559 is a game-changer, all the scaling technology can't come soon enough, and ETH 2.0 likely a huge catalyst for highly idiosyncratic arbs. I think the setup for ETH is solid as a trade when capital rotates back from #DeFi. | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1279820025252069378 2020-07-05 09:50:46 -0700 <iDecentralized> @CTAR16865900 No, ETH will always be the value at the lowest part of the stack, giving it the most security and settlement insurances. Bitcoin will always rely on custodians and/or bridging systems, which add complexity. Furthermore, any Bitcoin derivatives drive value back to ETH (EIP-1559) | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1279849296167395329 2020-07-05 11:47:05 -0700 <semertzidis> EIP-1559 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1279852828018827264 2020-07-05 12:01:07 -0700 <chainlinkington> How long will it take to have EIP-1559 rolled out? $Eth #Ethereum | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1279921576620830721 2020-07-05 16:34:18 -0700 <TheCoinRadar_> New post: The 1.x Files: EIP 1559 and the Ethereum Improvement Horizon https://t.co/HAltkjt0TU | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1279963041778417664 2020-07-05 19:19:04 -0700 <Gargant34260060> So I like this take which is for the Floating escalator and implies best approach is to implement Eip1559 first and then if needed extend it with the floating escalator- hits all the right buttons and good analysis https://t.co/EhVsDyLovC | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1280014404830941185 2020-07-05 22:43:10 -0700 <CoffeeTimesTW> 今週分は - Matcha - DFINITY - EIP1559 - DerivaDEX - The Graph - cUSD - Omen - Sorare などです☕️ 短く読めると思うので、ぜひご覧ください https://t.co/9QMSRKPPp6 | 0 replies 3 retweets 23 likes | |
| 1280031605692776450 2020-07-05 23:51:31 -0700 <Crypto_n_derivs> #DeFi is great, projects are v interesting but some token valuations are too high. Most projects can be copied and improved. Experienced teams and established #dapps are valuable, but it's really easy to copy them & make them better The biggest winner may be #ETH after EIP1559 https://t.co/2Ep1o9HcoS | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1280040776332869632 2020-07-06 00:27:57 -0700 <Crypto_n_derivs> #EIP1559 Buy the rumour. Sell when it gets implemented. Can you imagine all the insane #ETH fees pumping your bags? *Testing and implementation might get accelerated by the recent Gitcoin grant https://t.co/es8SzFKM6v | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1280056994196381696 2020-07-06 01:32:24 -0700 <tomohiro_tagami> 今週も一生懸命Substack配信しました。 ・FATF国際会議/トラベルルール ・欧州ブロックチェーンレポート ・GraphがSAFTで資金調達 ・米国内国歳入庁(IRS)によるTxの追跡 ・EIP1559の新たなガス代モデル などです！ Special Thanks!! @TN98118032 @9dai_5 @shingen_crypto https://t.co/nfGc8Gkc5G | 0 replies 7 retweets 25 likes | |
| 1280087529840992258 2020-07-06 03:33:44 -0700 <_uiti> だからEIP1559のような、tx feeにかかわる機能はめちゃ大事。 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1280100792716922880 2020-07-06 04:26:26 -0700 <stonecoldpat0> Or is it because he dared question EIP-1559? https://t.co/sQN3w4nqhy | 2 replies 0 retweets 8 likes | |
| 1280108314555068417 2020-07-06 04:56:20 -0700 <OcNAxTJ0un4H7HT> イーサのガス代がずっと高いのってEIP1559とか関係してるのかな？ イーサ手数料の仕組み自体が変わるかもしれないからマイナーが安心してマイニング出来ない的な🤔 こんだけガス代高い期間続けばマイナーもさすがに掘ると思うんけど何か掘るに掘れない理由があるんだろうな。 #分からんけど https://t.co/HbbGI86n8X | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1280141261421244416 2020-07-06 07:07:15 -0700 <VentureCoinist> $ETH trying to move up after a sideways June. The narrative for bullish ETH action has been there (eth 2.0, deFi, EIP 1559) and the charts support that. https://t.co/AQOoIRYPOU | 12 replies 32 retweets 187 likes | |
| 1280150852234248199 2020-07-06 07:45:21 -0700 <krugman25> @kevingaspar @sassal0x I don't know enough about the technicals of mining to offer a solution, but if miners can artificially pump up the fees with little risk or recourse, that seems like a flaw, not a feature. My guess is EIP 1559 addresses this, but that is how far down the road? | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1280170724162809858 2020-07-06 09:04:19 -0700 <okite_neru> 抹茶の手数料が下がるなら多分普段使いにするなこれ。 使いやすいし、なんか目に優しい。 Matchaのローンチ / EIP1559がETHの価値を高める by @CoffeeTimesTW https://t.co/v67QuUNftS | 0 replies 1 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1280255207109128192 2020-07-06 14:40:02 -0700 <sassal0x> @krugman25 It could be legit behavior (miner payouts) even if its inefficient but you're right that the current fee mechanism on Ethereum pretty much encourages this behavior when the network is at capacity. We need EIP-1559! | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1280255938000293888 2020-07-06 14:42:56 -0700 <krugman25> @sassal0x My understanding of how EIP-1559 works is that it would 100% eliminate this possibility. Actually, this was the #1 issue that led me to donating on gitcoin. | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1280272542788456449 2020-07-06 15:48:55 -0700 <das_grasshopper> @RyanSAdams @VitalikButerin @BanklessHQ EIP1559, zk Rollups, VDF Alliance and Verifiable Delay Functions, secure multiparty computation (MPC), Cross-shard communication, and finally, thoughts on Leaderless BFT (Avalanche protocol)? | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1280287775678328833 2020-07-06 16:49:26 -0700 <bitcoiner2140> ETHの「使う時に買うから保有するとは限らない」問題は結構前から言われてたんだけど、EIP1559でインフレ率は下がるしEthereum2.0が始まればStakingが出来るからHODLする人は増えるような気もするんだけどね。むしろ他のプロジェクトより過小評価されてる気が... | 0 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1280426983042584578 2020-07-07 02:02:36 -0700 <GOXGOXGOX2> イーサリアムのEIP1559 現在は ユーザーがETH買う ↓ ユーザーが手数料払う ↓ マイナーが手数料受け取る ↓ マイナーがETH売る でマイナーとユーザーの間で行ききしてるだけの価値を基本料金burnでETH価値を高めるらしい dappsが活発になればなるほどburnされるからburn量は減らされるのかな | 0 replies 0 retweets 7 likes | |
| 1280464745024364546 2020-07-07 04:32:39 -0700 <pleyuh> @ASvanevik I believe it is from neutral to negative for a PoW, non-EIP1559 ETH as they do compete with ETH for payments. With PoS and coinburns online any onchain activity would increase ETH's value in some way pretty much. I also believe that PoS and coin burns are not priced in. | 0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1280501903739289601 2020-07-07 07:00:19 -0700 <CHalexov2016> @VitalikButerin @hasufl @dankrad Hey @VitalikButerin why you keep spending energy for that tweet about premine.... better spend more energy on deliver eth2 phase 0 staking and eip1559 and later full eth2.0 ... sometimes you spend energy for not important stuff i saw. Good luck. Maybe better take some vacation 🤝 | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1280519389054287873 2020-07-07 08:09:47 -0700 <TraderDefi> @RyanSAdams @VitalikButerin @BanklessHQ Eip 1559! Please, this is good for ethereums long term security. | 0 replies 1 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1280522132296998913 2020-07-07 08:20:41 -0700 <bittrio> I think 1 $ETH = 1 $USD. Still researching and looking for a counter to my argument. Staking (Bonds), Ice age (Makes eth less valuable and more like fiat, POW>POS), Eip 1559 (I like this, but doesn't counter the eth = fiat argument) #Ethereum = #DigitalFiat | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1280554832655417349 2020-07-07 10:30:38 -0700 <taoteh1221> Analysis of EIP-1559 - Deribit Insights https://t.co/WbTBroTmBD | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1280605596870250496 2020-07-07 13:52:21 -0700 <AFDudley0> @nnnnicholas @guest__user I worked on the first OmiseGo paper. I worked on EIP-1559. There are maybe a few other papers that are public with my name on them... I'd say I conceptualized the majority of FOAM PoL, but all of these works are team efforts. ah, I guess this paper isn't released yet... | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1280607724615512064 2020-07-07 14:00:48 -0700 <stkopt> @jdorman81 @MapleLeafCap But you did not elaborate on why ETH does not has value capture mechanisms. What about the scarcity games that are baked into the protocol? Or when ETH is locked in DeFi? Or staking? EIP1559? What about simply the narrative of these tokens are built on ETH = ETH price go up? | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1280666257612779520 2020-07-07 17:53:24 -0700 <AlexMasmej> If you agree please support EIP-1559 The more tx the higher the ETH burn rate Making ETH correlates to its growth | 1 replies 4 retweets 18 likes | |
| 1280668707887280129 2020-07-07 18:03:08 -0700 <edmundedgar> If you think EIP1559 makes for a better fee market and a nicer user experience, please support EIP1559. If you think you're going to make the number go up by printing block rewards with the left hand and and burning them with the right hand, go work on the next Fomo3D instead | 1 replies 1 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1280769848948207616 2020-07-08 00:45:02 -0700 <DastardlyDaniel> Adding a burn mechanic when making a TX might help bring up a tokens value, ETH is looking to add that in EIP1559. Again, ETH will just be one of many inter-linked chains. Sometimes a general purpose chain isn't what you need for a given app or project though. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1280789991996547075 2020-07-08 02:05:04 -0700 <sassal0x> @stardigrada @R_Tyler_Smith If apps have to move to layer 2 for scalability then that means layer 1 is clogged (like it is today) which means lots of ETH is being used to pay for gas. With EIP-1559, a lot of this ETH will be burned. | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1280810228079104006 2020-07-08 03:25:29 -0700 <anydotcrypto> We have put together an idea for a price sensitive challenge process and published it as EIP-2774: https://t.co/4Ae4LQv2Oi It leverages the BASEFEE from EIP-1559 as a gas oracle and extends the deadline if the price spikes. Useful for swift auctions, DAO voting mechanism, etc | 1 replies 2 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1280829202858737668 2020-07-08 04:40:53 -0700 <stonecoldpat0> Protocols that rely on a fixed deadline suffer when the network fee spikes. This proposal lets the blockchain self-inspect when the network fee spikes and then continuously extend the deadline until congestion disappears. It can be instantiated with EIP-1559 which is neat! | 1 replies 2 retweets 8 likes | |
| 1280831132787863552 2020-07-08 04:48:33 -0700 <willmorriss4> It’s not possible to send all of your ETH under #eip1559 | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1280928511323234306 2020-07-08 11:15:30 -0700 <farmerdefi> @econoar @coinmetrics when EIP-1559 tho? https://t.co/pJ8ufZfNp6 | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1280929319313784832 2020-07-08 11:18:42 -0700 <TrustlessState> With EIP 1559, those fees are burned. | 5 replies 9 retweets 61 likes | |
| 1280930692348739584 2020-07-08 11:24:10 -0700 <phil_eth> @farmerdefi @econoar @coinmetrics eip1559 wouldn't change anything in situations where blocks are almost full like now as it defaults to a first price auction mechanism. | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1280936058180505601 2020-07-08 11:45:29 -0700 <stonecoldpat0> @jadler0 i dunno they seem pretty excited by EIP-1559 and this can be bootstrapped off it | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1280947553958277121 2020-07-08 12:31:10 -0700 <PhABCD> In an Eth2.0 world where issuance is low, tx fees will account for a large % of Ethereum's security budget. EIP-1559 eats most of it, which means issuance could need to be increased to compensate. What minimum security budget is needed is unclear to me, but it can't be 0. | 3 replies 2 retweets 8 likes | |
| 1280948780645244933 2020-07-08 12:36:02 -0700 <DarehWinston> @iamDCinvestor True. $ETH has been a sleeping beauty so far. So much happening and almost impossible to keep up. The price will eventually follow. I am curious and worried about ETH 2.0 and how it will play out. Excited about EIP 1559 at the same time of course. | 1 replies 1 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1280949570160263168 2020-07-08 12:39:11 -0700 <PhABCD> On the other hand, I like to think of a security budget that is only based on issuance since fees have been historically more volatile than ETH's price. EIP-1559 will also make fee revenue significantly more predictable, which is appealing for analyzing the network's security. | 2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1280950671441719296 2020-07-08 12:43:33 -0700 <willmorriss4> @PhABCD EIP 1559 might eat none of it if miners collude to maximize their revenue | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1280954265385738240 2020-07-08 12:57:50 -0700 <haydenzadams> @PhABCD Yeah but security budget can theoretically be way lower in POS and still be secure I can imagine a world where fees burned by EIP-1559 are equivalent to ETH issuance and the remaining network ees are all thats needed to incentivize staking | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1280980016939978752 2020-07-08 14:40:10 -0700 <TarasBob> @MikeMcDonald89 @AugurProject That seems like a good metric to me, it’s a pretty good way to estimate demand. It measures how valuable block space is in a particular chain. In a few months these fees will be burned instead of given to miners in Ethereum when EIP 1559 gets implemented. Look it up. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1280985383334039553 2020-07-08 15:01:29 -0700 <iamDCinvestor> @stardigrada @UniswapProtocol It's still SUPER early. A lot is on the horizon here: 1) growth of ETH as censorship resistant collateral in DeFi apps 2) looming implementation of EIP-1559 (will burn fees) 3) arrival of staking soon, which will lock ETH 4) retail speculation in ETH, as a proxy for DeFi | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1280986401337683968 2020-07-08 15:05:32 -0700 <FixedNotStable> @iamDCinvestor @UniswapProtocol 1) Fair point. 2) EIP-1559 will likely take a few more months before being implemented, right? So the timing may be an issue here. 3) Soon™, and that has nothing to do with DeFi. 4) Definitely a fair point, but mostly because retail is uneducated. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1281007653984940032 2020-07-08 16:29:59 -0700 <willmorriss4> @PhABCD Increasing throughput doesn't necessarily result in more fees, for gas price could go down. Higher gas limits also increases their overhead, and move the deadline when older ASICs stop working. It seems the increase to 11m did increase fees, but EIP1559 would lower to 8m. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1281049101132419073 2020-07-08 19:14:41 -0700 <IAmBabyJesuz> @rtayag @deejfi @TuurDemeester @PeterLBrandt EIP 1559 and staking will make the price go up. The rest will fuel the fire. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1281049540120854528 2020-07-08 19:16:25 -0700 <rtayag> @IAmBabyJesuz @deejfi @TuurDemeester @PeterLBrandt I don't know what EIP 1559 is but I am familiar with staking. I'm not convinced it's going to keep things decentralized -- I think it will be a centralizing force, unfortunately. It certainly could raise the price, I don't see why it couldn't, but... | 2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1281050145857998849 2020-07-08 19:18:50 -0700 <IAmBabyJesuz> @rtayag @deejfi @TuurDemeester @PeterLBrandt EIP 1559 changes the fee structure. Also turns Ethereum into a deflationary asset. Where the total supply goes down not up. With fee burning. I recommend you look into it. Already has 70+ thousand dollars backing it by the community. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1281092722586202112 2020-07-08 22:08:01 -0700 <EthereumNetw> #Ethereum biweekly report from @Paradigm_fund: EIP-1559 on fire, Altona multiclient testnet launched, @0xProject releases @matchaxyz, @gnosisPM prediction markets are live, @SkaleNetwork is live, @AugurProject v2 will launch on July 28th, and much more! https://t.co/D4re4tBN57 | 3 replies 13 retweets 33 likes | |
| 1281281601553514496 2020-07-09 10:38:33 -0700 <PanvalaHQ> Since donated tokens in Panvala are removed from the circulating supply, it’s useful to compare our results with Ethereum’s EIP 1559. If the proposal to burn fees were in place today, the current supply of ETH would be 55,000 times the transaction fees removed from circulation. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1281281602417557504 2020-07-09 10:38:33 -0700 <PanvalaHQ> In comparison, the current supply of PAN was 130 times the donated tokens removed from circulation. That means that Panvala’s donors are currently removing much more PAN from circulation than EIP 1559 will do for Ethereum. https://t.co/M7qHfBKVNc | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1281319923319558145 2020-07-09 13:10:50 -0700 <TheCoinRadar_> New post: The 1.x Files: EIP 1559 and the Ethereum Improvement Horizon https://t.co/HAltkjt0TU | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1281559774467850242 2020-07-10 05:03:55 -0700 <LiamJanssens> @TrustlessState Eip 1559 and staking. I'll keep saying it. That's what ETH the asset needs if it doesn't want to depend on purely narratives. (not a bear, heavily long) but that's the harsh reality imo. | 1 replies 0 retweets 13 likes | |
| 1281591635537620992 2020-07-10 07:10:31 -0700 <TimBeiko> And we are on! First up on the agenda are a few EIPs to discuss. First up is EIP-1559. The two big updates are that we've started working on a 1559 testnet, which should be up in the next week or so, and that we're looking to get a formal analysis of the EIP to prove it works 😁 | 2 replies 0 retweets 7 likes | |
| 1281591875879628800 2020-07-10 07:11:28 -0700 <Arthur_0x> At least give us EIP-1559 if we can't get ETH 2.0 this year? | 7 replies 8 retweets 138 likes | |
| 1281592589565792257 2020-07-10 07:14:18 -0700 <davidiach> @Arthur_0x Indeed. I think the grant for EIP-1559 had the most contributors and the most amount of funds raised in the history of gitcoin grants. People really want this. And it can happen way before ETH2. | 0 replies 0 retweets 9 likes | |
| 1281594991048101888 2020-07-10 07:23:51 -0700 <iamDCinvestor> While it'll be cool to stake, eth2 Phase 0 will not do enhance Ethereum's current functionality. eth1x will evolve (and hopefully incorporate EIP-1559), and L2 scaling efforts will continue to take off. Regardless of eth2 , Ethereum is not stopping to take a breath. /end | 0 replies 0 retweets 7 likes | |
| 1281597048240902149 2020-07-10 07:32:01 -0700 <notgrubles> @MrHodl No that part is fine, I guess. I'm referring to EIP-1559 which (verbatim from the proposal) "ensures that only ETH can ever be used to pay for transactions on Ethereum, cementing the economic value of ETH within the Ethereum platform". | 3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1281603920050171910 2020-07-10 07:59:20 -0700 <FigoETH> @zooko @matt_bitcoin @haydenzadams BTC on Ethereum needs security guarantees. These increase with ETH price. More important to ETHs value propositions are imo - issuance reduction due to PoS - Staking in ETH 2.0 - Defi lockup - EIP 1559 Leading to ETH being a better SoV than Bitcoin | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1281617410508955649 2020-07-10 08:52:56 -0700 <0xKiwi_> @Arthur_0x Different teams entirely, but EIP1559 is definitely a priority ATM. Lots of people focusing to get it in this year. | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1281635338922921986 2020-07-10 10:04:11 -0700 <tokenstate> EIP-1559 activation would essentially start reducing ETH supply via fee burns 🔥 Making the asset more scarce than gold. more demand = less supply | 0 replies 2 retweets 12 likes | |
| 1281685708772605960 2020-07-10 13:24:20 -0700 <benjaminjwhitby> @twobitidiot TPS should be greatly increased - target 100k EIP1559 - flattens the issuance curve Staking locks up % of tokens issued already DApps and DeFi growth drives demand. Oh and #OneMillionDevs 😉 | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1281738909328855044 2020-07-10 16:55:44 -0700 <krugman25> @iamDCinvestor I think it needs to work both ways as well. Recently signalled my support for EIP-1559 through a gitcoin donation. | 0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1281767215025405952 2020-07-10 18:48:12 -0700 <GatheringGwei> @danheld @AlexSaundersAU @raiden_network The cool part about ETH is that it does not rely on fees for security - Security budget will vary between 0.17%-1.56% based on validator count Once EIP1559 is implemented, majority of fees will be burnt, bringing issuance down towards 0% or even deflationary depending on usage https://t.co/ixqgPkf03d | 0 replies 2 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1281862280955625473 2020-07-11 01:05:58 -0700 <PJusername> @cyounessi1 @sassal0x So true man. ETH 2.0 and EIP 1559 will be here before we know it. We will look back on how impatient we were and wished we just kept stacking ETH. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1281952662242553856 2020-07-11 07:05:06 -0700 <TraderDefi> @RyanSAdams We need eip1559 for it to really flow into eth long term | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1281992359874527233 2020-07-11 09:42:51 -0700 <poojaranjan19> Interesting conversation on EIP-2711, EIP-2718, EIP-1559, @Ethereum's network health, and more in ACD meeting 91, notes available. #blockchain #eip #network | 0 replies 1 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1282120557983481857 2020-07-11 18:12:16 -0700 <nouveaucapital> @preston_vanloon @prylabs @sigp_io @ethnimbus @PegaSysEng @ChainSafeth @ethereum Maybe instead of gambling on prediction markets, ETH supporters should donate their money to the devs or the EIP 1559 initiative?🤨 | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1282147057604726786 2020-07-11 19:57:34 -0700 <Shizcrey> @nouveaucapital @preston_vanloon @prylabs @sigp_io @ethnimbus @PegaSysEng @ChainSafeth @ethereum Didn't the EIP1559 initiative get a shit ton of money in the gitcoin grant? People can use their money however the hell want. | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1282178732254359557 2020-07-11 22:03:26 -0700 <sassal0x> @MarkyGoldstein Have you heard of EIP-1559? :) https://t.co/hyAvKogKiY | 1 replies 0 retweets 10 likes | |
| 1282201794559373313 2020-07-11 23:35:04 -0700 <thegezman> @ceterispar1bus I also think the EIP 1559 could be a catalyst for some ETH traction. | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1282282006244663297 2020-07-12 04:53:48 -0700 <ElaeIdentity> Will EIP-1559 be a make or break it moment for Ethereum (ETH)? https://t.co/bx8QXwC3XB | 0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1282390260752637952 2020-07-12 12:03:58 -0700 <alexgausman> @CTAR16865900 @Foobazzler @tokenterminal @defimarketcap Staking and EIP 1559 will help ETH accrue value from fees on Ethereum. This means, that in the worst case, ETH should be able to maintain a market cap of ~20x the annual fees spent on Ethereum. But the marketcap could be much, much higher if ETH is also used as an SoV and MoE. | 2 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1282437512028393473 2020-07-12 15:11:44 -0700 <lpham2011> @JunkoSu22993224 very bullish on eth and chainlink. These 2 togeather will be unstoppable. Eth maybe just gas now but once eth 2.0 and eip 1559 come out, its a all new game. | 0 replies 1 retweets 7 likes | |
| 1282493795582357506 2020-07-12 18:55:23 -0700 <ChainLinkGod> @albeit70428035 @4KTV @JWilliamsFstmed Theoretically yes, but in practice not until EIP-1559 and PoS | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1282583796500566017 2020-07-13 00:53:00 -0700 <mhass33> @ChainLinkGod @alexgausman @twobitidiot BTC has the strongest argument because of its hard governance and high decentralization. ETH is a step below and working on it, there are challenges with issuance policy and EIP1559 is an attempt to push things in the right direction. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1282584371258695680 2020-07-13 00:55:18 -0700 <mhass33> @ChainLinkGod @alexgausman @twobitidiot ETH is not a great example. EIP1559 is an admission of such. Who decides link issuance policy? Who decides payout policy? | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1282589430595846144 2020-07-13 01:15:24 -0700 <siamakmasnavi> @RyanWatkins_ @WilsonWithiam Also, this problem with high transaction fees is why EIP-1559 ( https://t.co/vgBkITMwPx), proposed by @VitalikButerin, @econoar, et al, and nicely described by @sassal0x in issue #17 of his "The Daily Gwei" newsletter ( https://t.co/CCdD6v4dF6), can't get implemented soon enough. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1282593994040586240 2020-07-13 01:33:32 -0700 <FixedNotStable> @intocryptoast I still don't get what will bootstrap the ETH bull cycle. Most DeFi protocols will move to layer-2 solutions, Polkadot is coming, fees are just SO expensive, EIP-1559 will likely take a few more months to come,... Nothing really bullish here. Any insights @intocryptoast? | 2 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1282682521843576833 2020-07-13 07:25:18 -0700 <TheCoinRadar_> New post: The 1.x Files: EIP 1559 and the Ethereum Improvement Horizon https://t.co/HAltkjt0TU | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1282740799776739329 2020-07-13 11:16:53 -0700 <CryptoADavid> @tokenstate I could see ETH going there at some point w/ eip 1559 | 1 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1282775503959724033 2020-07-13 13:34:47 -0700 <AlexMasmej> Ethereum is still quite secure, but DeFi liquidity mining is more incentivizing to users than ETH “public sentiment”. The “protocol to economy” ratio is shaped deterministically by blockchain economics. Yet another proof that PoS & EIP1559 are needed for an aquaponic system | 1 replies 2 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1282778694067654658 2020-07-13 13:47:28 -0700 <SasaJesic> @VladZamfir Governance? I will print ether transactions with eip 1559😜😜😜 https://t.co/qSFsOuvKWX | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1282816060752683008 2020-07-13 16:15:57 -0700 <least_nathan> @_prestwich Alright, how about "place where discussion about cross-shard communication is happening" ? Meanwhile, I guess I'll focus on reading EIP 1559 conversation for my next Ethereum study: https://t.co/Esif8uPGJV | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1282912836658720770 2020-07-13 22:40:30 -0700 <ChainLinkGod> @IslandHunting Gas price can often spike and wallets unusually don't catch up immediately, can't really blame the users here if that was the default UX offered EIP-1559 helps somewhat in this regard but not during congestion, meta-transactions are key, I feel like that's flown under the radar | 1 replies 0 retweets 7 likes | |
| 1283063032562610176 2020-07-14 08:37:19 -0700 <TimBeiko> @hasufl @MolochDAO FWIW, the grant raise we got for EIP-1559 (and various Eth2 client teams previous grants) is a good indicator that there is _some_ appetite by the community to fund this, but so far the funds have had to be heavily matched by orgs like CS and EF. | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1283167825679446018 2020-07-14 15:33:44 -0700 <moigottweets> @sassal0x Other assets accruing value is a sign of Ethereum becoming a platform and with eip1559 the free ride ends. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1283198587246002176 2020-07-14 17:35:58 -0700 <ChainLinkGod> @sassal0x @antiprosynth Particularly after PoS and EIP-1559 have been implemented | 1 replies 0 retweets 6 likes | |
| 1283208736241143808 2020-07-14 18:16:18 -0700 <sss4321_s> @sassal0x The value accrues as per token design. $ETH token design needs an overhaul and EIP-1559 will help | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1283245757366038529 2020-07-14 20:43:24 -0700 <degen_julian> lmfao - People really want some of that eth numba to go up. Get eip 1559 through and then we are talking. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1283273486534926336 2020-07-14 22:33:35 -0700 <Crypto_n_derivs> #DeFi shitcoins pumping is good. Ecosystem grows. #ETH will capture value after EIP1559 gets implemented. It turns ETH water into ETH oil that you need to buy and burn... | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1283317144625852416 2020-07-15 01:27:04 -0700 <Crypto_n_derivs> @kyled116 https://t.co/HHhaFp9ssA Maybe more tweeting about #EIP1559 will increase awareness? It's a neat fee optimisation front for a clever number go up scheme... 🔥 There is overwhelming support already, we just need work and testing. It will get implemented on ETH1, I guess within 1y | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1283325244149727232 2020-07-15 01:59:15 -0700 <Crypto_n_derivs> These protocols have to execute transactions. Just wait till #eip1559 makes every tx pump #eth! ...when are they moving to L2s? Ekhm... $lrc 😇... | 0 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1283328626721566720 2020-07-15 02:12:42 -0700 <sassal0x> @davidiach @kyled116 Not really - there are concerns around the current design of EIP1559 (in particular, the 'tip' mechanism). So we may see another EIP take its place that would still include BASEFEE/fee burning but include a better 'tip' mechanism. | 1 replies 0 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1283329518732808194 2020-07-15 02:16:15 -0700 <Crypto_n_derivs> If you don't know why #EIP1559 is a big deal for #Ethereum, check out my YouTube video. If you decide that it's an awesome #ETH proposal, donate some dust to the gitcoin grant to show support. Or donate moar to fund testing and hard work... https://t.co/HHhaFp9ssA | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1283329538978508801 2020-07-15 02:16:19 -0700 <sassal0x> @davidiach @kyled116 Of course it will be if that's the path that is chosen. You can watch previous EIP1559 implementer calls or read the notes to follow the discussions in the meantime. https://t.co/UYf1usHtdD | 0 replies 0 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1283353871319007233 2020-07-15 03:53:01 -0700 <ethstatus> EIP-1559 will help make transaction fees more predictable on the network, and ensure ETH’s economic value is enshrined at the protocol level. Read about it in our latest update. https://t.co/xRb6ZjGMGA | 10 replies 58 retweets 236 likes | |
| 1283383597332742145 2020-07-15 05:51:08 -0700 <ph_status> If you're paying 2-5 usd per transaction well that's not good. A #DeFi project find a solution on how this problem solve! Check out EIP-1559. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1283407109946781696 2020-07-15 07:24:34 -0700 <xccybasis> @TheCryptoCactus This prolonged low vol coil is going to rip at some point, just not sure the catalyst. Is POS, EIP1559 going to cause an inflow of outside capital? If so, huge tailwinds | 0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1283441967385309184 2020-07-15 09:43:04 -0700 <ameensol> How important is EIP 1559 to #Ethereum's long term sustainability? | 5 replies 7 retweets 27 likes | |
| 1283441968631001089 2020-07-15 09:43:05 -0700 <ameensol> What's stopping EIP 1559 from being implemented tomorrow? | 2 replies 1 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1283445288422838274 2020-07-15 09:56:16 -0700 <iamDCinvestor> @APompliano @RyanSAdams Because something is not defined does not mean it's infinite. Fee burn is highly likely to be implemented via EIP-1559 or similar in the next year, plus massive issuance reduction via full PoS after that. Also, 21M BTC is an unsustainable meme Bitcoiners will one day regret. | 0 replies 0 retweets 31 likes | |
| 1283446982980382720 2020-07-15 10:03:00 -0700 <PhABCD> @ameensol Why would someone consider this EIP as critical? Ethereum will fail without EIP-1559? I'm concerned by the amount of people considering *this* EIP as *critical*. | 1 replies 0 retweets 9 likes | |
| 1283447945443135489 2020-07-15 10:06:50 -0700 <AdamSophrosyne> @AFDudley0 After all, it is ethereum that enables all of this token activity in the first place, and ether to pay the computation. Much like the defi hype, there will be a staking hype, EIP1559 hype, etc. Momentum ebbs and flows. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1283452827701051413 2020-07-15 10:26:14 -0700 <PhABCD> @tonysheng @ameensol But ETH has been valued for billions for many years, valuation that did not involve EIP-1559. Plus wouldn't the staking and collateral be sufficient? Imo, when it comes to value, it's a nice to have indeed (ignoring security loss), but it's not necessary. | 1 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1283456457099411456 2020-07-15 10:40:39 -0700 <AttestantIO> EIP-1559: ETH Fee Market Change Proposal: 'If implemented, #Ethereum improvement proposal (EIP) 1559 will be the largest change to how users bid for blockspace in any major #blockchain.' https://t.co/A42hWDHQyT | 0 replies 2 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1283471377115353088 2020-07-15 11:39:56 -0700 <tokenstate> @MisterKeegan @musatheredguard @evan_van_ness 1/ Monies that can adjust supply to demand are sustainable. For example, ETH will easily burn supply away if demand is high under EIP-1559. (negative issuance) If demand is low security still remains high b/c of block rewards. | 2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1283481860278898688 2020-07-15 12:21:36 -0700 <wekabot> @ameensol @PhABCD It seems like the implied step here is "EIP 1559 will increase ETH price", which is a bit of a leap, to put it mildly. | 2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes | |
| 1283483253316493313 2020-07-15 12:27:08 -0700 <cryptow1re> reddit 🤖: EIP-1559: ETH Fee Market Change Proposal https://t.co/khPl9if5TR | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1283485897426690055 2020-07-15 12:37:38 -0700 <veliko_test3> EIP-1559: ETH Fee Market Change Proposal https://t.co/Duo6vqBTtb | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1283486892500021248 2020-07-15 12:41:35 -0700 <wekabot> @iamDCinvestor @ameensol @PhABCD Trying to optimise your protocol for price is a fool's errand and a terrible idea. Optimize for usability; then people will use it. This "EIP1559 because ETH moon" thinking makes me less likely to support it, not more. | 3 replies 0 retweets 8 likes | |
| 1283487728248795141 2020-07-15 12:44:55 -0700 <DeanEigenmann> where is the proof that EIP-1559 works as intended? | 7 replies 3 retweets 24 likes | |
| 1283487873468170241 2020-07-15 12:45:29 -0700 <PhABCD> @econoar @wekabot @ameensol I think me and Nick agree on this. This is why I personally don't consider EIP-1559 to be critical, but a nice to have. Current gas UX isn't perfect, but it's not going to kill Ethereum if it stayed this way. | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1283487921484562433 2020-07-15 12:45:41 -0700 <iamDCinvestor> @wekabot @ameensol @PhABCD I didn't say "it *will* increase the price." However, we should take reasonable steps to reinforce the economic value of ETH (not price), because it ties to security of the protocol. I at no point said "ETH moon" from EIP-1559. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1283489953792569345 2020-07-15 12:53:45 -0700 <iamDCinvestor> @wekabot @ameensol @PhABCD > This "EIP1559 because ETH moon" thinking makes me less likely to support it, not more. Also, this is a poor reason to support or oppose something. If you don't like the proposal, OK. If you don't like it because some people want it for a given reason, that's seems imprudent. | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1283490536427606023 2020-07-15 12:56:04 -0700 <iamDCinvestor> @wekabot @ameensol @PhABCD I can only respond to points I've made. That said, EIP-1559 seems to have broad interest among many stakeholders, with many viewing it as an important element of refining ETH's economic model and improving usability/UX from a fee experience perspective. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1283491507790655490 2020-07-15 12:59:56 -0700 <iamDCinvestor> @wekabot @ameensol @PhABCD Anyone saying EIP-1559 will moon ETH is lying. That probably won't happen, and certainly not quickly. But you don't think the expectation that 1559 will economically harden ETH is acceptable grounds for implementing it? | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1283493172618747904 2020-07-15 13:06:33 -0700 <acoindetective> EIP-1559: ETH Fee Market Change Proposal $ETH $CAG https://t.co/EnIh4AF2FN | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1283494496252997632 2020-07-15 13:11:48 -0700 <thegostep> @DeanEigenmann @econoar @ameensol Eip 1559 would stop it | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1283495822718578688 2020-07-15 13:17:04 -0700 <AlexMasmej> @AFDudley0 @ameensol @TimBeiko Definitely not done, that’s why they had a Gitcoin Grant right? I’d say it’s not “mission critical” since ETH can pump hard like it did in 2017, but it ranks just after that, maybe “must have”? EIP1559 is a network-wide negative liquidity mining for all Ethereum transactions ⚡️ | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1283496173354049542 2020-07-15 13:18:28 -0700 <AlexMasmej> EIP1559 is a network-wide negative liquidity mining for all Ethereum transactions It correlates transactions growth to its price ⚡️ | 0 replies 2 retweets 6 likes | |
| 1283506868564840451 2020-07-15 14:00:58 -0700 <wekabot> @iamDCinvestor @JHancock @ameensol @PhABCD I view EIP 1559's change to the cryptoeconomic model as a very marginal one. It's certainly far smaller than the other effects it has, and those should weigh much more heavily in considering it. | 2 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1283507919800143872 2020-07-15 14:05:09 -0700 <iamDCinvestor> @wekabot @JHancock @ameensol @PhABCD Only over the long term, I do think the changes it introduces from a economic value perspective are important. And there are other good reasons to implement EIP-1559 beyond the economic changes it introduces. However, we can agree that all potential effects should be analyzed. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1283510285890969600 2020-07-15 14:14:33 -0700 <alex_taghavi> @wekabot @iamDCinvestor @JHancock @ameensol @PhABCD Are there EIP's in your opinion that have more significance than EIP 1559? It comes across to me that most are mainly focussed on EIP-1559, while many other valuable features are in the pipeline. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1283552622780112896 2020-07-15 17:02:47 -0700 <AFDudley0> Since I cycle between using blockchains and making them, I didn't fully appreciate how crazy gas prices are right now. EIP-1559 is not going to magically fix this shit show, we need a lot more than that. | 5 replies 3 retweets 33 likes | |
| 1283563501764534272 2020-07-15 17:46:00 -0700 <scupytrooples> @APompliano @RyanSAdams This is disingenuous. Eth has a steady rate of emissions for now, but eth2 and EIP 1559 will change this dynamic to where the supply could see periods of expansion and periods of contraction. In all likelihood, emissions will be 0-1% of eth supply annually, a tiny amount. | 0 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1283567333928308736 2020-07-15 18:01:14 -0700 <taha_zafar12> 1. ETH supply doesn't have a hard cap, that doesn't make it infinite. It's supply is finite, at any given point in time. The issuance rate is low, likely to go down further or become deflationary) once EIP 1559 and Eth2 are deployed. 2. Scarcity is relative to demand. #Ethereum | 0 replies 0 retweets 6 likes | |
| 1283604461152169986 2020-07-15 20:28:46 -0700 <econoar> Yes. EIP-1559 is important because it brings UX that people expect. The current fee market is not user friendly, at all. | 3 replies 6 retweets 30 likes | |
| 1283642286035709953 2020-07-15 22:59:04 -0700 <wekabot> Has anyone examined what the pending transaction pool logic would have to look like in an EIP1559 world? To protect against resource-exhaustion DoS, it's vital that it's possible to efficiently evict transactions, but that seems problematic under 1559. | 5 replies 2 retweets 14 likes | |
| 1283736165821157378 2020-07-16 05:12:07 -0700 <cryptow1re> #ethtrader 🤖: EIP-1559: No More Stuck TX, ETH Gets Burnt Reducing Supply https://t.co/zweyK9JtQM | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1283736176583675904 2020-07-16 05:12:09 -0700 <cryptow1re> reddit 🤖: EIP-1559: No More Stuck TX, ETH Gets Burnt Reducing Supply https://t.co/khPl9if5TR | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1283762487167418368 2020-07-16 06:56:42 -0700 <hardhathen> @econoar to play devil's advocate... is there not a risk that the `TIP` market replicates exactly what we see with the current gas market? I'm not too familiar with eip-1559 beyond the basic concept of a base fee plus a tip, so excuse me if I'm missing a core mechanic | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1283798130488680448 2020-07-16 09:18:20 -0700 <rbin> I wrote about #Ethereum EIP-1559 in one of my latest articles! Check it out here! | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1283807317754957825 2020-07-16 09:54:51 -0700 <schin_tomar> @AFDudley0 Agreed though its also about how efficiently you are utilising current protocol. EIP-1559 if not a final solution, is a start in right direction. And with Eth 2.0 account abstraction and concept of transaction batching, you can actually save enough Gas on majority of txns. | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1283834431082573824 2020-07-16 11:42:35 -0700 <MorganTBennett> @TrustlessState More than pumping is needed. Ethereum needs to implement EIP 1559 fast and more urgently: reduce block subsidy. https://t.co/ff2TA9KFie | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1283894918377693184 2020-07-16 15:42:56 -0700 <lightclients> @jadler0 @wekabot @uriklarman @edmundedgar I think the general question is does EIP-1559 impose additional load on the mempool beyond what it currently handles. Nick is saying that we don't have to revalidate every tx after a new block, because of the nonces (true). | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1283895365733724161 2020-07-16 15:44:43 -0700 <lightclients> @jadler0 @wekabot @uriklarman @edmundedgar My point is that in the worst case, every account could only have a single pending tx and therefore each of those txs must be revalidated. So in the worst case given the current protocol, I'm not sure what additional load EIP-1559 would be imposing on clients. | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1283913763565920257 2020-07-16 16:57:49 -0700 <AlexSaundersAU> Recently I spoke to @preston_vanloon & @hudsonjameson on the history & future of @ethereum. It's part of a project I've been working on behind the scenes to educate people on the transition to ETH2.0. Few realise #EIP1559 will make $ETH more scarce than $BTC! 🤓🌐✅ #StockToFlow https://t.co/6dcR9eXI3d | 3 replies 10 retweets 48 likes | |
| 1283918829307879424 2020-07-16 17:17:57 -0700 <DeFi_Dad> @g3nology It was previously a concern of mine. With EIP1559 on the table to burn ETH in every txn and seeing the rise of #yieldfarming, it has reaffirmed that staking participation will be overwhelming, hence locking up even more ETH and effectively reducing available ETH supply. | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1283926056815058945 2020-07-16 17:46:40 -0700 <danielpsegundo> ETH may be in the early innings of a sustainable earnings expansion. Growth in network earnings may parallel the run in late 2017 from ICOs. Adding staking and EIP-1559 will be important. It aligns incentives between tokenholders and validators by making them equivalent. https://t.co/cW7cAnzarv | 1 replies 1 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1283939901231165442 2020-07-16 18:41:41 -0700 <JonPeyn> Can't believe I already spent $454 just by trading with DEXes. Can already buy a new laptop or a new iphone with that. 😂 We need you EIP-1559. https://t.co/Bfd1TB9kNb | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1283950087035424768 2020-07-16 19:22:10 -0700 <DerekWai> Is EIP-1559 going to be the catalyst for the next pump up? 🤔 | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1283953898525536257 2020-07-16 19:37:18 -0700 <garypalmerjr> EIP-1559: ETH Fee Market Change Proposal https://t.co/vPZStdERVd | #Ethereum $ETH #Blockchain #FinTech | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1283991976283525121 2020-07-16 22:08:37 -0700 <tarangkhaitan> @DeFi_Dad Once EIP-1559 goes live, ETH will burn a portion of the gas fees as well. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1284019719406678016 2020-07-16 23:58:51 -0700 <Zima_Crypto> @MorganTBennett Either way that ETH used for txs cycles back to the miners who dump on you again. Who are the long-term buyers and holders? In the future there will be staking, inflation, & EIP-1559, but once the staking % becomes normalized and inflation > token burn, where is the demand? | 2 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1284020146789474312 2020-07-17 00:00:33 -0700 <ph_status> 📰Hottest news this week at @ethstatus Part2🔥 Status released 6 blogs at https://t.co/6vEyPz5GjA 1. The case for running your own validator 2. What is POS - Eth 2.0 3. EIP-1559 Proposal 4. Status app notification on android 5. Nimbus Beacon Chain 6. UX and improvements v1.4.1 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1284046111271981061 2020-07-17 01:43:44 -0700 <TheCoinRadar_> New post: The 1.x Files: EIP 1559 and the Ethereum Improvement Horizon https://t.co/HAltkjt0TU | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1284048986605682688 2020-07-17 01:55:09 -0700 <edmundedgar> @Zima_Crypto @MorganTBennett Burning fees moves money from stakers to non-stakers, it's definitely not to your benefit as a staker. Originally it was in EIP1559 as an implementation detail of a UX improvement, but people with brains pickled by PoW built a deflation cargo cult around it. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1284118184828731399 2020-07-17 06:30:07 -0700 <RyanSAdams> ETH is the unit of security of Ethereum EIP1559 fee burn isn't intended to increase the price of ETH. It's intended to increase the security of Ethereum. Fee burn is a security upgrade. | 3 replies 24 retweets 104 likes | |
| 1284127327375503363 2020-07-17 07:06:27 -0700 <PhABCD> @iamDCinvestor @sassal0x I can agree with this. Though when it comes to EIP-1559, it's unclear to me whether the potential price increase will offset miners/stakers loss of revenue. This is why a price increase is a speculative consideration, hence is a weak argument in favor of this EIP in my opinion. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1284130937245175809 2020-07-17 07:20:48 -0700 <PhABCD> @iamDCinvestor @sassal0x FYI, i'm very much in favor of EIP-1559 for the fact that it improves gas UX and I hope it will lead to natural higher ETH prices, but the latter is a bonus to me. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1284144766775521280 2020-07-17 08:15:45 -0700 <EthLaboratory> Bordering on Blasphemy but I'll say it. $sxp has similar fundamentals to $eth Hear me out: -Burning of base fees (eip1559) -Staking coming soon -Gas for the network And remember @binance have purchased a stack in their acquisition so are incentivised to pump this bitch. | 0 replies 1 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1284150852593352704 2020-07-17 08:39:56 -0700 <BanklessFR> Bonsoir à tous les DeFiers 😃, En cette fin de semaine nous arrivons avec quelques questions épicées 🌶️ : Avez-vous entendu parler 👂 de l’EIP-1559 🔥 ? Qu’en avez-vous compris 💡 ? Qu’en pensez-vous 🤔 ? Bon week-end et à très bientôt 👋, - @OtherBright & @TokenBrice | 1 replies 2 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1284152102869061632 2020-07-17 08:44:54 -0700 <vjsingh102> I just wanted to do a transaction which uses max gas of 700,000 and now I can't because the trans fee at these gas prices will cost me $10. 🤦♂️ Need L2/L1 scaling, #EIP1559 and PoS. 🙏 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1284178287766511617 2020-07-17 10:28:57 -0700 <Crypto_n_derivs> @HatHatHatHa @DegenSpartan wait till EIP1559 or equivalent turns ETH water into ETH oil. Donate dust to the gitcoin grant to show support or donate moar to fund testing and dev | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1284220559782338560 2020-07-17 13:16:55 -0700 <econoar> @iamDCinvestor @wekabot It is, that's why eip1559 mechanism will be in eth2 ;) | 2 replies 0 retweets 8 likes | |
| 1284240891302084608 2020-07-17 14:37:43 -0700 <stonecoldpat0> @AFDudley0 @wekabot @realLedgerwatch @JHancock @lightclients @jadler0 @uriklarman @edmundedgar I noticed someone mentioned that miners will pick the largest tip first. I don't think this is necessary true. In today's world, we can easily sort all transactions by fee, then work top to bottom. In EIP-1559 world, the tip can shrink, if tip + basefee > feecap. | 3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1284251277090631681 2020-07-17 15:18:59 -0700 <mcutler> @austingriffith @wekabot 👋🏼Yes... the @Blocknative team has been contemplating how EIP1559 might impact client behavior under high congestion and/or mempool pressure – and DOS scenarios specifically. Spoiler alert: we are wrapping up a new blog post that investigates a relevant scenario. Pls stay tuned! | 0 replies 0 retweets 6 likes | |
| 1284255125121298433 2020-07-17 15:34:16 -0700 <AFDudley0> @TimBeiko @wekabot @JHancock @realLedgerwatch @paddypisa @lightclients @jadler0 @uriklarman @edmundedgar Regardless of what the intent was, when people complain about fees being high EIP-1559 comes up as a solution. | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1284301431189602305 2020-07-17 18:38:17 -0700 <DeFi_Dad> I still buy #ETH ⟠ as an index of #DeFi. I want to own the highway where all this value is accruing, and looking forward to EIP1559.🔥 Don’t forget about ETH as an index for DeFi. ⟠ ⟠ ⟠ ⟠ ⟠ ⟠ ⟠ ⟠ ⟠ ⟠ ⟠ ⟠ ⟠ ⟠ ⟠ ⟠ ⟠ ⟠ | 2 replies 7 retweets 58 likes | |
| 1284349450509594626 2020-07-17 21:49:05 -0700 <MorganTBennett> @priyeshugarg Since eth 2.0 is quite different from 1, I’d expect it will jump to a new trendline and the old will become invalid. (Like in case of Monero after bulletproofs). A similar thing might happen when eip-1559 is implemented. Will be interesting to watch. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1284361446609035265 2020-07-17 22:36:45 -0700 <fubuloubu> There's a lot of misunderstandings around ETH's issuance when Ethereum 2.0 launches 🤔 Things that have no concrete plans (yet): - EIP 1559 - PoS finalization of Ethereum (and subsequent issuance reduction) - Hybrid PoW/PoS of Mainnet | 1 replies 1 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1284532381504860162 2020-07-18 09:55:59 -0700 <elusivechad> @BitcoinCartoon @ThePatToner I'm a big fan of EIP1559 too. But from what I've seen, in a crisis you want to be hodling sToilet Roll tokens... | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1284559764538589184 2020-07-18 11:44:48 -0700 <DeFi_Dad> @DeFi_licious @ethereum @spencernoon @ChrisBlec @RyanSAdams Eth2 is coming (I know I know 😂 we all must be patient) and EIP1559🔥. 70 Gwei sucks. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1284649415244804096 2020-07-18 17:41:02 -0700 <GatheringGwei> @kyled116 In terms of ERC20 security Transaction size is more important than marketcap - although correlated Large ERC20 marketcaps are fine as long as they are making transactions than Ethereum can secure EIP1559 should help prevent further abstraction of ETH (asset) from the protocol | 0 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1284687792488902657 2020-07-18 20:13:32 -0700 <Op_Waifu> @RUDEMUDCRAB @rektkid_ Fee market supports ETH price. Great for investors with EIP 1559. Not so much for users lol. | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1284697067982434304 2020-07-18 20:50:24 -0700 <taarushv> @bradmillscan @1inchExchange Gas prices are more dependent on usage than the price of ETH. i.e If the price of ETH was low, but on-chain usage caused people to make more bids, the price would still be high. The problem is the broken auction design. EIP1559 is trying to fix that https://t.co/Q1DXLiEWwQ | 1 replies 1 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1284733771284197376 2020-07-18 23:16:14 -0700 <degentwister> Ehereum $Eth do not really capture value from defi tokens. But EIP 1559 can be a huge huge catalyst to its value. $Eth monetary value is likely to increase and could be giving a good run in compared to $btc as well. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1284844876241219584 2020-07-19 06:37:44 -0700 <StefanCoolican> @danielpsegundo @RyanSAdams @cburniske I'm arguing this is real yield, not a nominal yield where inflation could outweigh nominal yield (in the latter case, there's no incentive to stake!). Of course, lots of variables here incl. EIP 1559. We'll see how this all shakes out when ETH2 is live🙂 | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1284944980855984128 2020-07-19 13:15:31 -0700 <DaxTaran> @NukeGold EIP1559 will save us 🙏 | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1284946060482355200 2020-07-19 13:19:48 -0700 <TheCoinRadar_> New post: The 1.x Files: EIP 1559 and the Ethereum Improvement Horizon https://t.co/HAltkjt0TU | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1284985955972083712 2020-07-19 15:58:20 -0700 <MikeAbundo> EIP 1559's gonna reel in lots of retail from the long tail. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1285007778768056321 2020-07-19 17:25:03 -0700 <sss4321_s> @SpartanBlack_1 I agree the profits will get recycled but I don't think it goes to $BTC. $ETH maybe possible with EIP-1559. $BTC is now truly a boomer coin. It has also lost it's narrative as digital gold with the market correlations in the recent time frame. Also, old story. | 1 replies 1 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1285111504535080960 2020-07-20 00:17:13 -0700 <LongLongfld> @india21st @FabsinIOTA In Eth's EIP 1559, trx fee will be burnt, so it is not like dump coins into the same supply pool | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1285112633901961218 2020-07-20 00:21:42 -0700 <CryptoEcon_Li> @tomuky @kevingaspar What if EIP1559 is implemented? | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1285121132123824128 2020-07-20 00:55:28 -0700 <gichiba> @adrianmcli @balajis @BrendanEich @evan_van_ness @metamask_io @tomhschmidt And on the horizon are new opportunities to experiment with different browser-naitive UX with changes being worked on in #EIP1559 (h/t @danfinlay @barnabemonnot et al.) | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1285199536147832834 2020-07-20 06:07:01 -0700 <CryptoEcon_Li> @RyanSAdams EIP1559 should be the catalyst for $ETH. | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1285200966044745729 2020-07-20 06:12:42 -0700 <latetot> @wekabot @iamDCinvestor I support EIP-1559 because 1) overall goal is minimum viable issuance (including net 0 or <0 if possible). 2) security costs should be shared between users (tx fees) and holders (block award). 3) 1559 provides a dynamic, market-based balance between users/holders for security | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1285201902867812352 2020-07-20 06:16:26 -0700 <latetot> @wekabot @iamDCinvestor Tx fees may be able to pay for all of chain security for certain periods of time but systems with zero block awards are inherently unstable. eip-1559 enables security costs to shift dynamically between users and holders. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1285210857014726656 2020-07-20 06:52:01 -0700 <blockmit_com> Veamos si activan finalmente el EIP1559 para reducir el precio del gas, que ahora mismo esta en precios desorbitados. #Ethereum | 1 replies 1 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1285211442094972929 2020-07-20 06:54:20 -0700 <fixtheblock> @blockmit_com Como siga así, morirá de éxito @VitalikButerin when EIP 1559? 😥 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1285216154852691968 2020-07-20 07:13:04 -0700 <BobaBonanza> @sassal0x Yikes!, This is really getting annoying, a functional Eth 2 is years away, we need EIP 1559 asap. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1285247688846594049 2020-07-20 09:18:22 -0700 <CrypDork> Ethereum tx fees are gonna drive folks that are doing smaller transactions off of DEXes and on to CEXes, as well as push them out of DeFi participation. This is unfortunate, and I hope we soon see some EIPs get thru to avoid this inevitable result. EIP-1559 looks promising. (1/3) | 1 replies 1 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1285261880869576706 2020-07-20 10:14:46 -0700 <least_nathan> I'm especially interested to wonder what this users experience would have been like in a post-EIP-1559 world: https://t.co/E0DQEDbozo Any thought experimenters want to tell me a tale? | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1285264417844682752 2020-07-20 10:24:50 -0700 <vjsingh102> @bwertz @sassal0x High gas prices are both good and bad. Good because it means #Ethereum is being used, a lot. Bad because it makes it economically unprofitable for small value transactions using complex smart contracts. Eagerly looking forward to L1/L2 scaling, #EIP1559 & #PoS. 🙏 | 0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1285265934798725121 2020-07-20 10:30:52 -0700 <PaoloRebuffo> So many #etherians complaining about gas fee but so little funding for #eip1559 https://t.co/ghQz2OCAVY. Put your money were your mouth is! | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1285274504592269313 2020-07-20 11:04:55 -0700 <ConsenSysQuorum> #HyperledgerBesu has been one of the clients leading the implementation of EIP-1559, a major upgrade to Ethereum’s transaction fee market. The upgrade will allow better transaction fee estimation and faster transaction inclusion in periods of high demand. https://t.co/inVhQNQQpp | 1 replies 15 retweets 32 likes | |
| 1285333913150410753 2020-07-20 15:00:59 -0700 <TheCoinRadar_> New post: The 1.x Files: EIP 1559 and the Ethereum Improvement Horizon https://t.co/HAltkjt0TU | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1285335079552770055 2020-07-20 15:05:37 -0700 <realLedgerwatch> And then combine it with fee burn of "EIP-1559". This is where it becomes interesting | 2 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1285341648499572738 2020-07-20 15:31:44 -0700 <iDecentralized> Currently, @kava_labs is utilizing Ethereum in order to properly secure its Chainlink Oracles through $LINK. Once EIP-1559 is live, this parasitic relationship will become symbiotic. All are welcome to use the Golden Global Settlement Layer. | 1 replies 1 retweets 15 likes | |
| 1285352391685009408 2020-07-20 16:14:25 -0700 <_Checkmatey_> @Frenchy_DCR @antiprosynth @svitekpavel @she_dec @OfficialCryptos @DefiWoof @swack0 @latetot @el_captn_ @Th3Acist @sethisimmons @fluffypony @tokenstate @ethereum @iamDCinvestor @RyanSAdams @decredproject @VitalikButerin @TrustlessState @jz_bz Which suggests its value capture mechanism isnt great. Hence 2.0 and EIP1559 | 1 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1285366784028143618 2020-07-20 17:11:36 -0700 <edmundedgar> @MuteDialog @antiprosynth @IslandHunting @wekabot @iamDCinvestor Agree - and this is one of the things that makes me uncomfortable with the pumping of the EIP1559 shuffling game: There's a very simple, easy-to-understand value proposition for ETH, pumping a free lunch will spook people who know there are no free lunches https://t.co/fQNQCb4kCS | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1285367637715718144 2020-07-20 17:15:00 -0700 <wekabot> I will say, one thing that would be really nice about EIP 1559 or similar proposals is having on-chain information about the current gas price. That would be incredibly useful in some situations. | 2 replies 4 retweets 52 likes | |
| 1285397922436112384 2020-07-20 19:15:20 -0700 <wekabot> @willmorriss4 Right; the premise of my whole tweet is "if EIP1559 works". | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1285411597377101825 2020-07-20 20:09:41 -0700 <ChainlinkP> @tbr90 New fiat gateways straight to ERC20 tokens are happening more frequently, which is absolutely not good for ETH. Also, certain wallets are abstracting away gas as it is. EIP-1559 needs to come sooner rather than later for ETH to maintain it's "undervalued" status. | 0 replies 0 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1285443130574036992 2020-07-20 22:14:59 -0700 <CCassets> gas代の高騰が続いている。 Eth2.0始まったら解決する、って声があるけど、 フェーズ0が始まってもEth1.0は何も現状変化無し。 Eth2が動くのはフェーズ2からで約2~3年後が想定されているわけで。 Q3~4予定のベルリンHFでも多少の最適化はあれど、EIP1559のような大幅改善はないっぽい。 | 1 replies 0 retweets 7 likes | |
| 1285456959932559360 2020-07-20 23:09:56 -0700 <EvanStinger> @cryptoLEGEND_id this DeFi euphoria might delay it, a paradox. ETH up means higher gas fee, more DeFi volumes means more ETH demand 🤷 either this DeFi bubbles' blown up or EIP 1559 passed, BTC might only sleep in sideways. it's funny how those maxis being butthurt because of this | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1285460660822986752 2020-07-20 23:24:38 -0700 <4Tendies> @EthereumMemes After eip 1559 this will be even more true lol 🔥 | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1285484228239675393 2020-07-21 00:58:17 -0700 <5dayoldburrito> @wekabot @willmorriss4 Do you think there are more benefits or drawbacks to EIP 1559 compared to the current fee market mechanism? | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1285504364082331648 2020-07-21 02:18:18 -0700 <PaoloRebuffo> So many #etherians complaining about gas fee but so little funding for #eip1559 https://t.co/ghQz2OCAVY. Put your money were your mouth is! $ETH #gasfee #ethereum | 1 replies 12 retweets 20 likes | |
| 1285512365576839168 2020-07-21 02:50:06 -0700 <sassal0x> @hasufl Few reasons why ETH will appreciate eventually (imo): - Fresh money flowing in to buy ETH (most in DeFi already have heavy ETH bags I assume) - Staking will (hopefully) lead to more natural demand - EIP-1559 is a good value driver via narrative (if implemented) | 6 replies 4 retweets 34 likes | |
| 1285515884602068993 2020-07-21 03:04:05 -0700 <Arthur_0x> As much as I like to agree with this, I will have less than 5% ETH exposure in my portfolio until EIP-1559 is implemented. No room to hold ETH if there's so many things you can do with stablecoins. | 6 replies 1 retweets 47 likes | |
| 1285517008789024768 2020-07-21 03:08:33 -0700 <Broccolex> Very skeptical on $ETH being the most obvious long when everyone and their mother has been expecting it to go up because of Defi. That's not how good trades generally work. Underperformance until EIP-1559 is implemented? Will be interesting to watch this develop this year. | 1 replies 0 retweets 7 likes | |
| 1285519621764907009 2020-07-21 03:18:56 -0700 <cryptofluxfr> Ethereum met les gaz ! – Tout comprendre à l’EIP 1559 ➡️ 100% de l'actu crypto sur https://t.co/icNgRRB1qs https://t.co/TeNnJLuEWj #Cryptomonnaies #Bitcoin #Blockchain | 0 replies 1 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1285520528824926213 2020-07-21 03:22:32 -0700 <Jerome_nTech> Ethereum met les gaz ! – Tout comprendre à l’EIP 1559 https://t.co/IoDrKlIHPn https://t.co/XMOXEUJT9z | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1285521246894137344 2020-07-21 03:25:23 -0700 <Spicyfr> Ethereum met les gaz ! - Tout comprendre à l'EIP 1559 - Journal du Coin https://t.co/xup5T3FGxF | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1285524933716529152 2020-07-21 03:40:02 -0700 <RGhadamian> @Arthur_0x When will EIP1559 be implemented? | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1285528627317280771 2020-07-21 03:54:43 -0700 <cryptofrench3> Ethereum met les gaz ! – Tout comprendre à l’EIP 1559 https://t.co/Mhh59ps9Vf | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1285539787202592768 2020-07-21 04:39:04 -0700 <LiamJanssens> @AriDavidPaul @antiprosynth @alee @ameensol @hasufl Although i agree with the circle jerk. Don't forget these protocols become more and more useful with liquidity. Liquidity begets liquidity. This is just the start imo. ETH will benefit once staking and eip 1559 are live. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1285540096037367818 2020-07-21 04:40:17 -0700 <DegenSpartan> @dafacto that's called economic abstraction and it has been discussed before, especially a lot recently with eip 1559 | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1285540136814600193 2020-07-21 04:40:27 -0700 <BiggBillBrasky> @sassal0x @GODdotETH @hasufl I see a lot of back and forth on EIP 1559 about whether the burning will actually be worthwhile based on increased issuance. Is there a good source I can go to on why EIP 1559 will actually create a significant impact as opposed to a negligible one? | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1285541281205309441 2020-07-21 04:45:00 -0700 <LeJournalDuCoin> Tout, tout, tout, il vous dit tout sur l'#EIP1559 : suivez @MorganPhuc pour une découverte de cette proposition de modification du système de frais d'#Ethereum ! 👇 https://t.co/zBAZOuqQc4 | 0 replies 2 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1285547627451494401 2020-07-21 05:10:13 -0700 <crypto_news24> Ethereum met les gaz ! – Tout comprendre à l’EIP 1559 (blockblog) A fond les ballons – Le modèle de frais de transaction sur Ethereum va être amené à changer. Ce sont... https://t.co/2kp7nFpo2F #French | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1285553872958873600 2020-07-21 05:35:02 -0700 <CryptoActuFr> Ethereum met les gaz ! – Tout comprendre à l’EIP 1559 https://t.co/KOGxdlF4FD #bitcoin #altcoin #Cryptocurrency #cryptomonnaie #cryptonews #blockchain @LeJournalDuCoin | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1285559904670044161 2020-07-21 05:59:00 -0700 <cortino60> RT @pciccioni: RT @PaoloRebuffo: So many #etherians complaining about gas fee but so little funding for #eip1559 https://t.co/EnrDfszZPl. Put your money were your mouth is! $ETH #gasfee #ethereum | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1285572932698349571 2020-07-21 06:50:46 -0700 <Marcolevarato> @scupytrooples @cicnos1 @Walodja1987 @hasufl @DegenSpartan @stoicsavage Gas price is decoupled from the ETH, with the actual auction system maybe someone will pay more than due for a short amount of time(during an explosive pump of eth price) but the price of the gas will shortly return at the average. The EIP 1559 will fix this inefficiency | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1285589502342422536 2020-07-21 07:56:37 -0700 <0xJohnnyO> @maxkeiser @IAmNickDodson have you learned about EIP1559 max? i'm guessing you're smart enough to know the ratio will pop leading up to ETH2. You know pretty much crypto is just a synonym for ethereum now since everything is on ethereum now. Don't be a crypto boomer afraid to get off of myspace! | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1285593115672358912 2020-07-21 08:10:58 -0700 <VitalikButerin> Transaction fee revenue is now nearing half as high as block reward revenue. This actually risks making ethereum *less* secure because of https://t.co/Dase8SL30z. Fee market reform (ie. EIP 1559) fixes this; another reason why that EIP is important. https://t.co/eqU3tAMh67 | 90 replies 229 retweets 1093 likes | |
| 1285593652933406720 2020-07-21 08:13:06 -0700 <_anishagnihotri> @VitalikButerin Hi Vitalik, do you have thoughts on EIP-2593 with escalating bids? Both as a standalone EIP and potentially in conjunction with EIP-1559 for optimized first-price auctions? | 1 replies 0 retweets 6 likes | |
| 1285594829360181248 2020-07-21 08:17:47 -0700 <BitCoinN00b> @IamNomad Yeah only way for ETH to really capture the value is if they start burning fees with EIP-1559 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1285597120624578562 2020-07-21 08:26:53 -0700 <elusivechad> @cmsholdings If both camps agree on the economic activity then obviously EIP-1559 and staking will make the #1 folk right. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1285598431885635584 2020-07-21 08:32:06 -0700 <CletusCrypto> @VitalikButerin Whats the ETA on EIP1559? This should be prioritised | 0 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1285601935123521541 2020-07-21 08:46:01 -0700 <iamDCinvestor> This idea has long been discussed and enjoys support among users and many devs. The overwhelming reaction to the Gitcoin grant to fund dev & testing work demonstrates this. I'd love to see us coalesce around implementing EIP-1559 in the hardfork after next (i.e., after Berlin). | 1 replies 14 retweets 56 likes | |
| 1285602603175419908 2020-07-21 08:48:40 -0700 <CHalexov2016> @VitalikButerin Btw @VitalikButerin tell community eip-1559 coming in midle 2021... so 1 more year? Or faster? | 1 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1285602828162138113 2020-07-21 08:49:34 -0700 <Betacrypto59> 📢Ethereum met les gaz ! – Tout comprendre à l’EIP 1559 https://t.co/cKk6To1xpR | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1285603827375321090 2020-07-21 08:53:32 -0700 <PaoloRebuffo> @VitalikButerin https://t.co/yUVcyRADva A good way to push eip-1559 is gitcoin #gasfee $ETH | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1285608453562667010 2020-07-21 09:11:55 -0700 <Gargant34260060> Yes @VitalikButerin but all core devs calls simply don’t put the same priority on this eip, there seems no sense of urgency & senior figures even seem to doubt its value so we now probably won’t see eip 1559 happen for a long time or have I mis judged the sentiment @TimBeiko ? | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1285623685156614151 2020-07-21 10:12:26 -0700 <Gargant34260060> @dafacto @DegenSpartan In short eip1559 should improve UX as well as burning some Eth off tx fees | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1285630829646012419 2020-07-21 10:40:50 -0700 <MorganTBennett> @laurashin 2. Why EIP-1559, an upgrade that has had overwhelming support in the community, has not been implemented yet. | 0 replies 0 retweets 7 likes | |
| 1285632714515853313 2020-07-21 10:48:19 -0700 <tarangkhaitan> @laurashin What is the fastest way to get the EIP-1559 deployed. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1285637873178415107 2020-07-21 11:08:49 -0700 <Rando144> @laurashin When eip 1559 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1285654920876773377 2020-07-21 12:16:34 -0700 <webnowcompany> Higher fees on Ethereum represent a security risk in the long-term, co-founder Vitalik Buterin said. He calls for the implementation of EIP 1559. The post ...Read more: https://t.co/r1IJNIlSgN | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1285656156862582789 2020-07-21 12:21:28 -0700 <davidiach> @Godwill234 @RyanSAdams With the move to Proof of Stake and fee burns (EIP-1559 or similar), the fees will partly go to people who stake ETH and another part of the fees will be burned (like with stock buybacks). That will have a positive impact on price. Now it's negative because miners are sellers. | 1 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1285658361908862978 2020-07-21 12:30:14 -0700 <elusivechad> @GoodTexture @RyanSAdams EIP-1559 is a way. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1285659484820574209 2020-07-21 12:34:42 -0700 <FigoETH> @DegenSpartan Think it makes much sense as premium collateral / SoV in the next few years - Earning "riskless" interest in PoS (3-5 % when matured) - getting more scarce due to EIP 1559 and DeFi lockup, maybe even negative issuance Attractive risk/reward ratio imo. | 1 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1285662578157510661 2020-07-21 12:46:59 -0700 <bitcoin_eagle> @antiprosynth Especially if they implement eip-1559 to reduce inflation and switch to ETH 2.0 proof of stake the ones who hold high amounts of ether will gain substantial power over the network and also they will gain Cantillion insider status. That can never happen in Bitcoin | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1285665105326243843 2020-07-21 12:57:02 -0700 <dlancashi> EIP 1559 and other fee-smoothing approaches break badly once miners stop sharing inbound tx flow. Larger incumbents can manipulate fee levels to bankrupt smaller competitors. Research @ Ethereum basically: "first assume everyone pools their lunch money..." | 0 replies 1 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1285679749226954752 2020-07-21 13:55:13 -0700 <rick_liquity> @wekabot @VitalikButerin Simulation can be useful in uncovering stable regimes / equilibria, but formal guarantees would be desirable too. There's a lot under the hood to EIP1559, it's important to understand its consequences! | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1285682420071768064 2020-07-21 14:05:50 -0700 <VitalikButerin> @edmundedgar Isn't that just saying do EIP 1559 as a softfork? | 3 replies 1 retweets 6 likes | |
| 1285684088532279302 2020-07-21 14:12:28 -0700 <edmundedgar> @hasufl @VitalikButerin Yes, but you need some kind of EIP1559-like basefee thing to incentivize putting the money in the pool instead of taking the payment for each block out-of-band and keeping it for yourself | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1285684127614799880 2020-07-21 14:12:37 -0700 <IAmNickDodson> Bitcoiner: high gas prices are good, no need to do anything, carry on Etherian: this is horrible, fix this now, EIP1559.. fist waves | 1 replies 2 retweets 21 likes | |
| 1285694583444320260 2020-07-21 14:54:10 -0700 <o0ragman0o> Feeling cute... #EIP1559 so good I'm going to merge it with the Linux kernel scheduler | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1285695914259165187 2020-07-21 14:59:27 -0700 <cyber_hokie> @Matthia93105091 @VitalikButerin Weird considering EIP-1559 was only first proposed a year ago. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1285701251418726402 2020-07-21 15:20:40 -0700 <litocoen> @RyanSAdams And EIP-1559. Everyone's talking about it but no one knows the status/what's happening. | 0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1285703334230450179 2020-07-21 15:28:56 -0700 <Teutonium> @stunad620 @Taicon Ethereum is moving down to 0% inflation, EIP1559 and PoS make it so, which means there will be a sort of max supply. And the fees are high because it has a lot of utilization n the protocols are still making the SC more efficient and still need to adopt the L2 tech like ZKroolups | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1285725091402326016 2020-07-21 16:55:24 -0700 <MiguelCervera> @hasufl If you look at gas prices, I think that's where the value has gone, right? $ETH is just the token used to purchase space in the blockchain, the price of $ETH hasn't gone up, but the price of the space in Ethereum (gas prices) has gone up drastically. EIP-1559 is a potential fix. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1285731029848858625 2020-07-21 17:18:59 -0700 <PhABCD> @wekabot @VitalikButerin Ah, apologies. Closest thing to formal analysis on EIP-1559 I know of is https://t.co/Dl24THajRy | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1285772058564190208 2020-07-21 20:02:01 -0700 <saxemberg> @kusamanetwork It's been over a year since EIP 1559 was first proposed. Hopefully it will be passed after another year and two more gitcoin grants 🤡 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1285793861139173376 2020-07-21 21:28:40 -0700 <CCassets> 仮に、 このgas価格があと2年間続くとしたら？（EIP1559導入されるかEth2.0フェーズ2始まるまで。） ざわざわするよねｗ | 2 replies 1 retweets 7 likes | |
| 1285796732136312832 2020-07-21 21:40:04 -0700 <SoMuchInfoOk> Vitalik #Buterin Warns High Fees Threaten #Ethereum’s Security - https://t.co/6V7WQWdJRJ #CoinTelegraph #Crypto #Eip1559 #EthereumCommunity #EthereumImprovementProposal #VitalikButerin #Ethereum (ETH) co-founder Vitalik #Buterin has called for reform to the cryptocurrency’s # ... | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1285800966068076545 2020-07-21 21:56:53 -0700 <LocalCryptosEN> #Ethereum Do you think EIP 1559 (raising total network capacity to 16M gas) could solve Ethereum's current scalability issue? 🤔 ⬇️ Pick your choice and comment your reasons | 2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1285850137185656832 2020-07-22 01:12:17 -0700 <bittestan> بوترین، همچنین از طرحی تحت عنوان پروتکل EIP 1559، برای بهبود هزینههای شبکه این رمزارز نیز حمایت کرده است. | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1285850539134263296 2020-07-22 01:13:53 -0700 <bittestan> همچنین دیوید هافمن مدیر ارشد این طرح در پستی روی وبلاگ خود، EIP 1559 را پازل نهایی سیاست پولی کریپتوکارنسیها نامید و اظهار داشت که اگر این پروتکل عملی شود، اتریوم امنتر میشود. برای مشاهده متن کامل خبر به لینک زیر مراجعه کنید. https://t.co/8zJ17oNqov #بیتستان #اخبار | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1285904328176402432 2020-07-22 04:47:37 -0700 <CryptoEcon_Li> @avsa @evan_van_ness EIP1559 and RollUp are needed. | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1285916240394027008 2020-07-22 05:34:57 -0700 <cryptow1re> #ethtrader 🤖: Vitalik Thinks Tx Fees are Too High, Supports EIP-1559 Fee Burn https://t.co/9XUnRDACR3 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1285916415355228164 2020-07-22 05:35:39 -0700 <cryptow1re> reddit 🤖: Vitalik Thinks Tx Fees are Too High, Supports EIP-1559 Fee Burn https://t.co/b9SKEmqzaf | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1285940973546209280 2020-07-22 07:13:14 -0700 <Marian0V> @Mariandipietra @labitcoincheta Que avance EIP1559 https://t.co/JXnylB3kSz | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1285943127136591873 2020-07-22 07:21:47 -0700 <AFDudley0> Sadly, everything in Ethereum is extremely complicated. If you think EIP1559 is going to "fix fees", it won't. Fixing this https://t.co/Vgew0JkmCC will go much further towards improving the current fee crisis. Here is the proposed solution, https://t.co/EvbNBaqvpR | 3 replies 6 retweets 38 likes | |
| 1285948738792558592 2020-07-22 07:44:05 -0700 <dankrad> @paddypisa @AFDudley0 EIP1559 *can* solve the overpaying problem for those ok to wait a few minutes in the worst case. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1285948922452676610 2020-07-22 07:44:49 -0700 <dankrad> @AFDudley0 @paddypisa There is nothing vague and handwavy about EIP1559 at all. It's based on pretty solid economics. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1285950738292600832 2020-07-22 07:52:02 -0700 <AFDudley0> @dankrad @paddypisa How The Ethereum Community expects EIP-1559 to change their experience of using Ethereum. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1285959729571942407 2020-07-22 08:27:46 -0700 <Logicb0x> @VitalikButerin Great post, but i don't think is accurate to say that the funding of EIP 1559 have a double function. Could be some type of signal if we had the negative funding or other proposal in the same round. “As is” people are worry about the gas market more than the other projects. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1285959785817546752 2020-07-22 08:27:59 -0700 <RyanSAdams> Dear Eth1 devs, We really want EIP1559. Can you help? - Everyone | 9 replies 25 retweets 165 likes | |
| 1285965482885971968 2020-07-22 08:50:37 -0700 <Fronta1pha> @RyanSAdams A year from now EIP1559 will be lauded as a success for keeping gas under 200 wei. Things are getting wild. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1285972952677339136 2020-07-22 09:20:18 -0700 <blockmit_com> Les va a explotar en la cara como no hagan algo con las comisiones, cerca de 100 gwei y no parece que vaya a bajar. Vitalik sigue queriendo aplicar el EIP1559 pero siguen de debate #Ethereum https://t.co/3zKYb1rvkV | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1285973710617354245 2020-07-22 09:23:19 -0700 <fubuloubu> @Foobazzler I agree with that. Probably the only reason why I see value in EIP-1559, I think having a burn mechanism would be an extremely interesting way of producing "dividends" for holders. | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1285976352773087239 2020-07-22 09:33:49 -0700 <bakiii_ee> Great explanation about how broken and inefficient current blockchain fee mechanism are and upcoming EIP-1559. https://t.co/NfDed1TrUD | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1285996559117606912 2020-07-22 10:54:07 -0700 <Onchained> $ETH has increased in value, but right now that value is flowing to the miners instead of going to the ETH holders. Once EIP-1559 get's implemented the value of ETH will soar as the supply will diminish for every mined block. The value will go to the holders then. | 0 replies 1 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1285997724635222016 2020-07-22 10:58:44 -0700 <Marian0V> @santisiri The answer of his tweet is the same reason of eth gas is going up... Is because is used! A real good signal. That and good new ideas as EIP1559. | 1 replies 1 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1286005795398848515 2020-07-22 11:30:49 -0700 <vodietsche> @MeisterDope EIP 1559 #Ethereum | 2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1286007451435913217 2020-07-22 11:37:23 -0700 <diskandarcrypto> @RyanSAdams @IvanOnTech this could be like buying Google, Amazon as a VC 20 years ago, not an investment advice ... looks like they are going there especially with EIP 1559 implemented, $ETH might lose steam if gas prices not taken care/scaling and other catch up really fast, about 60% probability. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1286012058409017345 2020-07-22 11:55:42 -0700 <fubuloubu> @alexgausman @Foobazzler I don't think of 🥩 ether as that much more productive of an asset over ether used for speculation. Stakers earn rewards (inflation) based on their % 🥩 (consumerate w/ costs); but with EIP-1559, all network stakeholders are rewarded with deflation based on overall network usage. | 2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1286050024103780354 2020-07-22 14:26:34 -0700 <realLedgerwatch> @RyanSAdams @antiprosynth There are some eth1 devs working on this. The spec is not final, as far I know. What other help does "everyone" want? Surely "everyone" does not expect ALL eth1 devs to drop whatever they are doing and code up EIP-1559? There is other "shit" to work on, like performance | 1 replies 0 retweets 12 likes | |
| 1286068365812011009 2020-07-22 15:39:27 -0700 <OnurHSolmaz> 🚨 Ethereum PSA 🚨 EIP-1559 is *NOT* designed to: - Lower fees. - Stabilize gas price for longer than a few minutes. It *is* designed to: - Enable objective and real time price discovery. - Increase fee market transparency and efficiency. | 2 replies 2 retweets 7 likes | |
| 1286068371277123584 2020-07-22 15:39:28 -0700 <OnurHSolmaz> Nobody ever claimed that EIP-1559 will fix high fees. But that's OK. Econ is confusing. It's easy to conflate certain concepts. Retweet so that people are informed. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1286071657480835074 2020-07-22 15:52:31 -0700 <farmwell123> @musatheredguard price appreciation is legit value accrual only to people speculating on the price appreciation, not as a characteristic of the asset at least pre EIP1559 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1286106251320074241 2020-07-22 18:09:59 -0700 <krugman25> @fubuloubu I knew I had low balled it! Global debt + global monetary base + global real estate + global equities = 650 trillion. Add in $ETH deflation a la EIP-1559. We might need to add another zero to the end of that ETH market cap est. 😏 | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1286151147468648451 2020-07-22 21:08:23 -0700 <ivan_switcheo> Together with 70 gwei txns.. #defi is really a 🐳 game at the moment. Is $ETH's endgame no longer about inclusiveness, or is EIP-1559 the solution? And is that even coming? | 2 replies 0 retweets 20 likes | |
| 1286182729847992322 2020-07-22 23:13:53 -0700 <tylerdmace> So ready for EIP-1559. 45+ bucks to register at Ethlance? fuckouttahere. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1286185425074364416 2020-07-22 23:24:36 -0700 <MOSTAFANAZARMO1> @ivan_switcheo EIP 1559 doesn't lower tx fees it only make it more stable... also it burn fees which is good to lower ETH inflation if switcheo provided an exchange with good liquidity and almost free tx fees it will be huge | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1286218740393287681 2020-07-23 01:36:59 -0700 <TheCoinRadar_> New post: The 1.x Files: EIP 1559 and the Ethereum Improvement Horizon https://t.co/HAltkjt0TU | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1286316327167303685 2020-07-23 08:04:45 -0700 <IAmNickDodson> @evabeylin Accurate. Looks like EIP1559 discussions. | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1286335079069945857 2020-07-23 09:19:16 -0700 <econoar> A new Into the Ether is live! This week @danfinlay joins me to talk @metamask_io. Topics: -Original formation of MetaMask -Living through 2017 craze -Recent v8 release -Plans for social recovery, L2 and more -Current gas market -EIP-1559 + Elevator algo https://t.co/RgLPKWorDA | 2 replies 17 retweets 44 likes | |
| 1286357784850726913 2020-07-23 10:49:29 -0700 <LongShortFundin> EIP1559 to expand blocks ASAP please | 0 replies 0 retweets 6 likes | |
| 1286361752624664578 2020-07-23 11:05:15 -0700 <ETN_HODL> 100 GWEI for gas is too much money. This can't be the new normal! EIP 1559 has be rushed through asap. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1286363191254163457 2020-07-23 11:10:58 -0700 <AttestantIO> @etherchain_org ... EIP-1559 fixes this | 3 replies 0 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1286394064129187841 2020-07-23 13:13:39 -0700 <BobaBonanza> @ChainLinkGod EIP 1559 soon please | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1286418072757248001 2020-07-23 14:49:03 -0700 <NazzMass> Quadratic Funding as a powerful incentive protocol of free speech 💸📢, showing recent consensus on EIP 1559 implementation to reform #Ethereum fee market 👉"Money & Speech" #KERNEL 🌱 @gitcoin @owocki #Blockchain #QF #Grants https://t.co/jCmojOmC8q | 0 replies 3 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1286419517602750464 2020-07-23 14:54:48 -0700 <DaoChemist> @scott_lew_is thanks for sharing sir, I feel better with my one thousand. Still, L2 and EIP-1559 any day now. | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1286444616342962176 2020-07-23 16:34:32 -0700 <jonathanmarcus> @kyled116 By value accrual do you mean fee burning in EIP-1559? | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1286446926989275137 2020-07-23 16:43:43 -0700 <alexgausman> Given that EIP-1559 and staking will allow ETH holders to capture value from fees on Ethereum, this graph is quite relevant and bullish for ETH's price floor. h/t @tokenterminal https://t.co/CHKTlwFNEJ | 1 replies 11 retweets 50 likes | |
| 1286452147010383873 2020-07-23 17:04:27 -0700 <j_larrieux> @QWQiao - Eth staking reducing issuance to less than 1%, - EIP-1559. Would those 2 things be enough for you? | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1286488955441934337 2020-07-23 19:30:43 -0700 <cc_ninjaboys> EIP-1559がGas代見直しで推奨されているが、どこまで解消出来るかが見どころです。 マイナーは長期的に見て、Gasバブルが長引くよりも混雑の解消と適切な手数料でユースケースが正常化する事を望んでいます。 | 0 replies 2 retweets 6 likes | |
| 1286643715201740802 2020-07-24 05:45:41 -0700 <ReadReed> @TheCryptoLark Thoughts on EIP-1559? I can see the $ETH community struggling for next 6 months if there are no remedies soon. Right now I'm legit making choices to pay extreme gas on $SNX weekly escrow vs the future speculative value of the token. And yield farming transfers are painful too. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1286661086159278081 2020-07-24 06:54:42 -0700 <aniketpkate> @nadahalli @mminaeib @Hanakookie1 thread such as https://t.co/B26cGJx0nz uses that as an argument. Disclaimer: I do not know or have any opinion about EIP-1559. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1286682486634721280 2020-07-24 08:19:44 -0700 <TimBeiko> @peter_szilagyi says his concern is that if we introduce transaction versioning, we should introduce new transaction types as part of the same upgrade. Two candidates are EIP-2711 ( https://t.co/2LfcSxO4Cf) and EIP-1559, which would be easier to implement under EIP-2718. | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1286768116580732928 2020-07-24 14:00:00 -0700 <CryptoEcon_Li> The significance of #EIP1559 to #Ethereum's monetary policy. https://t.co/dYPvp4NPWl | 1 replies 7 retweets 29 likes | |
| 1286772881112866822 2020-07-24 14:18:56 -0700 <Ethereum_Dan> @RyanSAdams EIP 1559 is the way to go | 0 replies 0 retweets 6 likes | |
| 1286781752929693696 2020-07-24 14:54:11 -0700 <BillyLuedtke> @RyanSAdams We should get all the defi bros to join a coding bootcamp together and then usher in EIP 1559 | 0 replies 0 retweets 7 likes | |
| 1286788889667964929 2020-07-24 15:22:33 -0700 <Raullen> EIP1559: Gas = a dynamic basefee + tip to miners, where basefee is burned to allow $ETH to capture the value of its #DApps Eventually, a few dominant #DApps can afford gas => innovation may stop BurnDrop basefee can be interesting - burn to tax, airdrop to impel energetic apps | 1 replies 6 retweets 10 likes | |
| 1286824345495654402 2020-07-24 17:43:26 -0700 <CryptoEcon_Li> @duyong_lee @antiprosynth Apparently, #EIP1559 still needs more work before implementation. Given its importance, many Ethereans are funding this project via @gitcoin grants. Let us donate and ask others to do the same: https://t.co/6MZO9JqmpK | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1286837146939092992 2020-07-24 18:34:18 -0700 <alexgausman> @factcheckmypost @mikeinspace @bradmillscan As a dev it’s my personal opinion that Ethereum and other public, programmable blockchains enable a lot of cool stuff. Gross fees have also been going up and eip1559 will direct some of that value back to ETH holders. Definitely not a scam. You should do more research. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1286891367814160384 2020-07-24 22:09:46 -0700 <tarangkhaitan> @RyanSAdams EIP-1559 cant come soon enough, I wish there was a way to implement it right now :| | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1286923878426583040 2020-07-25 00:18:57 -0700 <santiagoroel> @DvdSchwrtz When EIP 1559? ⌛️ | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1287040198061125633 2020-07-25 08:01:09 -0700 <TraderDefi> @RyanSAdams EIP 1559 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1287060391147606020 2020-07-25 09:21:24 -0700 <TraderDefi> @Zack_Bennett @RyanSAdams Ethereum also issues coins, but with EIP 1559 it will also burn them. Two ways to secure the network. The problem with your views is that you don't understand Ethereum or why the burn is used. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1287063151293288448 2020-07-25 09:32:22 -0700 <TraderDefi> @Zack_Bennett @RyanSAdams Read EIP 1559 Must do for anyone really interested. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1287078160497090563 2020-07-25 10:32:00 -0700 <CryptoEcon_Li> @RyanSAdams Are you talking about EIP1559? | 1 replies 0 retweets 11 likes | |
| 1287121599787937792 2020-07-25 13:24:37 -0700 <krugman25> @szakacs_robert @DonDurrett High gas means there is high demand for the blockchain (bullish). On the flip-side, necessity is the mother of invention so there are already projects rolling out layer 2 solutions(zkRollups, batching, @loopringorg , etc.) Not to mention EIP-1559 and Ethereum 2.0... etc. etc. | 0 replies 2 retweets 15 likes | |
| 1287165880066027520 2020-07-25 16:20:34 -0700 <TheCoinRadar_> New post: The 1.x Files: EIP 1559 and the Ethereum Improvement Horizon https://t.co/HAltkjt0TU | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1287509062607876098 2020-07-26 15:04:15 -0700 <WPMonty> @pete_rizzo_ BTC is probably bird in hand. But if ETH2 and EIP1559 hit, staking rewards compound the position with an improved monetary policy. | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1287530739089543168 2020-07-26 16:30:24 -0700 <chubchubkun> @yuma300 @bigstonebtc EIP1559に変われば大分違うと思いますが。 | 1 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1287531080346529792 2020-07-26 16:31:45 -0700 <Samurai_ETH> @theog__ @DeFiDude Eth 2 phase 0-1-2 , layer 2 solutions, EIP 1559 and other EIPs, DeFi with tons of dApps. Thats just to name a few. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1287639598315614208 2020-07-26 23:42:58 -0700 <CryptoByKsquare> This is jst the beginning guys, I hope everyone has stocked enough #ether for a better future. With defi and scaling measure on verge of launch & EIP 1559, this will be huge. @ethereum @kunal_ksquare @NischalShetty @cryptokanoon @simplykashif @ThatNaimish @vijesh2901 @binance https://t.co/hXH0kD3OxK | 0 replies 1 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1287640797882413056 2020-07-26 23:47:44 -0700 <scupytrooples> @Darrko1921 @TheCryptoDog EIP 1559 and staking will be incredibly bullish for price. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1287699142467293186 2020-07-27 03:39:34 -0700 <0xCristiano> @goodfreephotos @zhusu So what do you suppose will happen once Eth 2.0 launches and EIP-1559 gets integrated? Automatic fee calculation combined with tps many orders of magnitude above its measly current 16 tps—seems like they could be a game changer whilst simultaneously boosting the chain's security. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1287761548287586312 2020-07-27 07:47:33 -0700 <cliff_eth> @swack0 @_Checkmatey_ @antiprosynth @NoahPierau @behindtext @Th3Acist @sethisimmons @fluffypony @tokenstate @ethereum @iamDCinvestor @RyanSAdams @decredproject @VitalikButerin @TrustlessState @jz_bz @coinbase @lukebp_ And, there is ZERO market validation. Decred could be out of the Top 100 in next couple months. No one cares about the $DCR asset. There is no demand for the $DCR asset. Sell $DCR and buy $ETH, before.. EIP 1559 PoS/staking ETH v2 upgrades Scalability | 1 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1287777682629865472 2020-07-27 08:51:39 -0700 <Danny_Desert> @RobotMan23 @diyen250 @RaoulGMI ETH2 testnet is launching Aug 4 and you guys should check out EIP-1559. https://t.co/8pjeN8sjuF | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1287778667024850944 2020-07-27 08:55:34 -0700 <ARKInvest> #ARKDisrupt | Issue 232 is now available! This week we cover ride-hailing as an opportunity for #Tesla, Tesla EPA range, #CashApp revolutionizing consumer finance, should Nvidia buy ARM?, EIP 1559 & #Ether, COVID-19 vaccine, & more! Read it now: https://t.co/M7csHTJMhh | 0 replies 24 retweets 98 likes | |
| 1287805655349329921 2020-07-27 10:42:49 -0700 <polymath_gray> @cz_binance EIP 1559, Ethereum users would now pay a set “base fee” to the network plus a tip to miners. One technical observer calls it “the biggest change to any blockchain post-release.” | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1287828733928386560 2020-07-27 12:14:31 -0700 <IAmNickDodson> So EIP1559 tomorrow everyone? | 5 replies 1 retweets 31 likes | |
| 1287830166643843072 2020-07-27 12:20:13 -0700 <AnettRolikova> @IAmNickDodson What about Wednesday ? @EthMagicians will host EIP1559 sessions on Wednesday too https://t.co/468a2tfOe1 | 0 replies 1 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1287871028836745217 2020-07-27 15:02:35 -0700 <TheCoinRadar_> New post: The 1.x Files: EIP 1559 and the Ethereum Improvement Horizon https://t.co/HAltkjbpvk | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1287892654898937856 2020-07-27 16:28:31 -0700 <SCBuergel> Stop thinking exclusively about fancy mechanisms (👀#EIP1559 👀) and start pushing harder for actually decentralized infrastructure that actual people actually use @AvadoCloud @DAppNode @nodl_it @POKTnetwork | 0 replies 3 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1287896364467142658 2020-07-27 16:43:15 -0700 <jemenger> @EthMagicians are hosting Summer Sessions for the community on Wed. July 29 at 3-6pm CET. Topics include social governance layer, EIPIP, and EIP-1559. Plus, a fun experiment! https://t.co/VUkDtzVHFm | 1 replies 3 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1288047961692233728 2020-07-28 02:45:39 -0700 <peterxing> #232: Ride-Hailing Is Overlooked as Opportunity for Tesla, Tesla Throws Down the Gauntlet, Cash App is Revolutionizing Consumer Finance, Should Nvidia Buy ARM, Will EIP 1559 Boost Ether’s Price, COVID-19 Vaccine Might Not Be Approved Until 2021 @ARKInvest https://t.co/x14JLoto7Q | 0 replies 1 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1288050076020084736 2020-07-28 02:54:03 -0700 <TheDeFiList> #Ethereum #Gas prices on the rise. With the rise of #DeFI & #NFT's, users are finding it hard to transact. Ethereum Developers Consider New Fee Model as Gas Costs Climb - EIP1559 🔗 https://t.co/ObWRHLrm2Y #Crypto #cryptocurrency $GWEI $WEI | 2 replies 1 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1288053034560389120 2020-07-28 03:05:48 -0700 <dmihal> @wekabot @ChainLinkGod @IAmNickDodson Hopefully better price discovery for gas prices? EIP1559 would provide gas prices at the protocol level, right now everyone is pretty much querying ETHGasStation & choosing fast/standard/slow | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1288077364384194560 2020-07-28 04:42:29 -0700 <drakefjustin> Burning ETH (on top of the EIP-1559 fee burn) is a simple incentive-aligned way for dApps to rally the Ethereum marketing machine for extra growth. Total Value Burnt (TVB) may become a prime DeFi metric alongside Total Value Locked (TVL). | 12 replies 50 retweets 291 likes | |
| 1288085207950618625 2020-07-28 05:13:39 -0700 <owocki> EIP 1559 | 3 replies 2 retweets 6 likes | |
| 1288106553669824513 2020-07-28 06:38:28 -0700 <mathew_corm> @owocki Surprisingly high number of "What's that". For those who would like to learn the basics of EIP 1559: https://t.co/EWF1c5u4kb | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1288145943213178880 2020-07-28 09:15:00 -0700 <0xTycoon> @BenDiFrancesco Thanks to the #defi & staking, more $ETH will be locked. Together with issuance dropping to under %1 in the future, and EIP-1559 burning the supply making $ETH more scarce. So, I it would be safe to say that all the pieces are there to make the flippening is almost inevitable. | 0 replies 1 retweets 8 likes | |
| 1288151014487490560 2020-07-28 09:35:09 -0700 <ivanacostarubio> EIP 1559 is the Ethereum version of Maximalism. What a joke. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1288210806321160193 2020-07-28 13:32:44 -0700 <trent_vanepps> @anisimov_andrei this appears to combine a few ideas, let me know if it's off base: MEV: miner extractable value, or the right to order tx in a block 2. EIP 1559 style "time to inclusion" tx pricing. "next block inclusion is x gas price" | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1288307720999907330 2020-07-28 19:57:50 -0700 <cryptoandfire> 🏗️ETH gas at really high levels for a long time pushes developers to move to other blockchain. Hope ETH resolves this through EIP-1559 soon. 🪂🚀 @ Los Angeles, California https://t.co/vtzhGoY1Vf | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1288330232429125633 2020-07-28 21:27:18 -0700 <0xTycoon> @IAN_HEXIL Once ETH 2.0 arrives, and 30m ETH is staking, then issuance would be below %1 (currently BTC is at 2% ). Together with EIP1559 which is a proposal to burn ETH, we may actually see the supply go down! | 1 replies 1 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1288354912246480897 2020-07-28 23:05:22 -0700 <jemenger> @EthMagicians will be hosting Summer Sessions 2020 today 3-6pm CET / 9am-noon EST, leading up to the Eth In Enterprise event on Thursday. 3pm → Social Governance 4pm → EIP Improvement 5pm → EIP-1559 All details are on the Forum. https://t.co/VUkDtzVHFm | 0 replies 3 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1288423996787236865 2020-07-29 03:39:53 -0700 <RyanBerckmans> In reality, transaction fees go to miners today, until Ethereum moves to proof of stake in Eth1.5. As well, EIP-1559 is awesome. It will burn transaction fees. This doesn't break the dividend model discussed in this thread. 6/6 https://t.co/E4eG6Boyv1 | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1288427464335806464 2020-07-29 03:53:39 -0700 <AnettRolikova> Join @EthMagicians Summer Sessions today 🏖️ Topics 🔥 Social Governance @TheEther2077 EIP Improvement Process @EthCatHerders EIP-1559 fee market change @barnabemonnot @TimBeiko @danfinlay RSVP https://t.co/ZbWpYMYnUm | 2 replies 10 retweets 42 likes | |
| 1288452071499464704 2020-07-29 05:31:26 -0700 <HafidFakhri> #Ethereum Burning ETH (on top of the EIP-1559 fee burn) is a simple incentive-aligned way for dApps to rally the Ethereum marketing machine for extra growth. Total Value Burnt (TVB) may become a prime DeFi metric alongside Total Value Locked (TVL). | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1288457250676277248 2020-07-29 05:52:01 -0700 <lililashka> Come join @EthMagicians gathering now to discuss about Social Governance, EIP Improvement Process group and EIP-1559 fee market change. Get your tickets ASAP https://t.co/oMobAn94Mc https://t.co/Tq0cytGua1 | 2 replies 5 retweets 25 likes | |
| 1288460902220673025 2020-07-29 06:06:32 -0700 <MOSTAFANAZARMO1> @ChrisBlec staking + EIP 1559 could make this a reality staking has proved several times to be a very potent catalyst for tokens price appreciation and EIP 1559 with current crazy fees trend can actually push eth inflation to be lower than BTC inflation | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1288492840721555459 2020-07-29 08:13:26 -0700 <CryptoEcon_Li> #Ethereum is congested. At 125 Gwei, my tx is still pending. 😭 We need to implement #EIP1559 ASAP! https://t.co/eTaxglN2yx | 1 replies 0 retweets 7 likes | |
| 1288494312154529793 2020-07-29 08:19:17 -0700 <jemenger> Amazing @EthMagicians discussion of EIP-1559 happening now. https://t.co/VUkDtzVHFm | 1 replies 11 retweets 24 likes | |
| 1288498488611762178 2020-07-29 08:35:53 -0700 <jemenger> Part of it was delving into examples from @barnabemonnot's EIP-1559 simulator, @danfinlay then explained a bit about his escalator alternative proposal, and now @cryptograthor asks for clarification with some white boarding. This is the greatest. https://t.co/uZraFeu1k8 | 2 replies 2 retweets 9 likes | |
| 1288504373333630977 2020-07-29 08:59:16 -0700 <JimmyRagosa> I'm of the same opinion: - L2 solutions never make it => #ETH L1 fees go 📈 - L2 solutions are widely used => #ETH L1 fees go 📈 I only see the ETH1<>ETH2 merger as a significant driver to reduce fees (EIP-1559 will only have a small impact on this). | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1288507218585772033 2020-07-29 09:10:34 -0700 <alexgausman> @ercwl Seems like the best way to measure user demand in terms of marketcap. Also, wit EIP-1559 and PoS, value from fees will get caputred for ETH holders (in the future). Based on this I can not imagine ETH's P/E (or P/F) dropping below 20 for a prolonged period. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1288531957995970567 2020-07-29 10:48:53 -0700 <VitalikButerin> @kevinsekniqi @gladstein I think the new narrative is "bitcoin is a sound money invention, that's what matters; the tech is at best a necessary evil to make sure the sound money keeps working" In that light of course ethereum looks illegitimate. (though that perspective underestimates PoS, EIP 1559...) | 5 replies 0 retweets 12 likes | |
| 1288615267917017090 2020-07-29 16:19:55 -0700 <GregusJakub> Can anyone run numbers how eip 1559 affect eth supply in current times? and it will rise for sure which is creating huge demand side for... eth tadaah. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1288618738179289088 2020-07-29 16:33:43 -0700 <TheCoinRadar_> New post: The 1.x Files: EIP 1559 and the Ethereum Improvement Horizon https://t.co/HAltkjt0TU | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1288662908142985216 2020-07-29 19:29:14 -0700 <SpartanBlack_1> @chewie_backa_ Launch of ETH2.0 will be a catalyst. EIP1559 implementation is another major catalyst. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1288829387752771587 2020-07-30 06:30:45 -0700 <crypto_no_flair> $ETH 2.0 is a huge fundamental change. It's gonna take a while, but phase 0 (staking) is launching this year. EIP-1559 will probably be implemented in 2021. A big change to the tokenomics of $ETH (burn, fees) 👉 https://t.co/X6G5eILS3P Incentives to buy and hold will increase. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1288847977700896771 2020-07-30 07:44:38 -0700 <seven7hwave> @annavladi Agreed! Ideally it should dynamically adjust and abstract the whole damn thing away. That's the best-case scenario. (EIP-1559 should help). The worst-case scenario is when you want to send a TX but are completely locked into what the wallet thinks. Too low, and it's a looong wait | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1288852918741827590 2020-07-30 08:04:16 -0700 <GitcoinFeed> . Staff • https://t.co/aJOO5caXu0 Bot@gitcoinbot contributed to EIP-1559 Community Fund /grants/946/eip-1559-community-fund | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1288932569636110336 2020-07-30 13:20:46 -0700 <fvictorio_nan> @pablowasserman The wishful thinking answer is that L2 solutions and EIP-1559 will improve things (I agree with this, for what it's worth) | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1288936674270105603 2020-07-30 13:37:05 -0700 <BobaBonanza> @ChrisBlec doesn't EIP 1559 fix that? | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1288943760861204484 2020-07-30 14:05:14 -0700 <GitcoinFeed> . Staff • https://t.co/aJOO5bTmCs Bot@gitcoinbot contributed to EIP-1559 Community Fund /grants/946/eip-1559-community-fund | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1288978787997114368 2020-07-30 16:24:25 -0700 <CryptoEliteNews> What if ETH had a fee burn 5 years ago? A thought experiment on the effects of EIP 1559 #eip #eth #fee #ethereum https://t.co/Jf7Q49FbHz | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1289127435896786945 2020-07-31 02:15:06 -0700 <maqstik> Anyone interested in understanding the difference between EIP-1559 and the new $ZIL tokenomics proposal? If there is enough interest, I will prepare a thread. | 18 replies 14 retweets 128 likes | |
| 1289136909487239169 2020-07-31 02:52:44 -0700 <prithivthanga> Have worked on Ed25519 pk signatures in bigchaindb, what is with EIP 1559 ? | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1289153495464058880 2020-07-31 03:58:39 -0700 <maqstik> EIP1559 vs new $ZIL tokenomics proposal a thread 👇 There are two key changes that EIP1559 proposes: 1.1) In the current model on Ethereum, users send transactions to the Ethereum network with a gas price of their choice and miners pick the ones with the highest bids. | 7 replies 35 retweets 103 likes | |
| 1289153505618534400 2020-07-31 03:58:41 -0700 <maqstik> 1.6) Otherwise, one miner may disagree with another and transactions will not be processed. The way the global minimum gas price in Zilliqa is decided is very similar to EIP-1559 and is dependent on network usage. | 1 replies 0 retweets 14 likes | |
| 1289153509514981376 2020-07-31 03:58:42 -0700 <maqstik> 2.1) The second key change in EIP-1559 is on burning. Any gas fee paid by the user as a part of a transaction will not go to the miner. Instead, it'll be burnt. There are several rationales behind burning. The main one being that burning keeps the inflation in check. | 1 replies 1 retweets 16 likes | |
| 1289197347684012032 2020-07-31 06:52:54 -0700 <AlexSaundersAU> @krugermacro That's all about to change once staking & EIP 1559 go live https://t.co/6jyGNZT7JP | 6 replies 0 retweets 21 likes | |
| 1289198245755797506 2020-07-31 06:56:28 -0700 <DeepBlueCrypto> @AlexSaundersAU @krugermacro Exactly EIP1559 is going to change #Ethereum scarcity forever. Staking is still a long way down IMO | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1289198724434935808 2020-07-31 06:58:22 -0700 <Asliajay_> @AlexSaundersAU @krugermacro Step1 : Create a highly pre-mined unscrupulous coin (which was infact never marketed as money) Step2 : EIP 1559. Lol | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1289215720761565186 2020-07-31 08:05:54 -0700 <FigoETH> @krugermacro A hard cap which is not sustainable due to longterm security problems is just marketing funny stuff. Really important metric imo is the longterm sustainable issuance. ETH is leading there (perhaps even negative with EIP 1559 and ETH lockup in DeFi) https://t.co/pAg8CC606x | 1 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1289232629800169473 2020-07-31 09:13:06 -0700 <Delphi_Digital> 1/ Within this report, we dive into all of the below topics and more! 🔹Gas & Fees 🔹DeFi Overview 🔹Stablecoins 🔹DEXs 🔹Staking Market Options 🔹Beacon Chain Phase 0 🔹Impact of ETH 2.0 on Token Economics 🔹EIP 1559 https://t.co/otys2XR8kY | 1 replies 1 retweets 25 likes | |
| 1289236462869852161 2020-07-31 09:28:20 -0700 <Kevin_Kelly_II> Our newest analyst @Alex_Ged crushed his first State of Ethereum report. If you read one thing this weekend, it's this. 🔹DeFi Overview 🔹Stablecoins 🔹DEXs 🔹Staking Market Options 🔹Beacon Chain Phase 0 🔹Impact of ETH 2.0 on Token Econ 🔹EIP 1559 https://t.co/kOqCSt8ngv | 0 replies 0 retweets 8 likes | |
| 1289243605358452738 2020-07-31 09:56:43 -0700 <barnabemonnot> A new notebook on stationary behaviour of EIP 1559. Users decide whether to send a transaction, depending on the current basefee level, following a simple bidding strategy. https://t.co/MiyIB7TYuv | 1 replies 8 retweets 21 likes | |
| 1289243610139914241 2020-07-31 09:56:44 -0700 <barnabemonnot> This follows a previous notebook on the mechanism of EIP 1559 with non-strategic users. https://t.co/XRJPTzYoKu | 1 replies 1 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1289281772677500930 2020-07-31 12:28:22 -0700 <anapheys> Wen eip-1559 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1289325609617772546 2020-07-31 15:22:34 -0700 <TimBeiko> Friday night updates on EIP-1559 simulation 👇🏻👀🔥 | 0 replies 1 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1289341788529074183 2020-07-31 16:26:51 -0700 <MapleLeafCap> @QWQiao The monetary policy of ETH is still utter garbage. No value accrual logically until EIP-1559 or variations of it. Betting on it now is akin to skating to where the puck is, betting on protocol upgrade turning water to oil. | 2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1289341946930933760 2020-07-31 16:27:29 -0700 <brad_eth> @QWQiao I feel ETH has a sufficiently credible narrative on monetary policy with 'Minimum Viable Issuance'. PoS + EIP-1559. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1289350754843734018 2020-07-31 17:02:29 -0700 <AlexMasmej> @josephdelong @TrustlessState If EIP-1559 existed these jokes would actually reduce ETH supply... we found a usecase for personal tokens! | 0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1289487719190560769 2020-08-01 02:06:44 -0700 <Gargant34260060> @paddypisa @mysticryuujin @ETHGasStation Wouldn’t this suggest that eip1559 plus escalator would have a positive effect even in these over heated times - usually its painted as not useful when already overheated situation | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1289543131868864512 2020-08-01 05:46:55 -0700 <hasufl> The biggest news hardly anyone in Bitcoin-land is talking about. Further, post-EIP-1559 most of these fees would be burned, creating deflationary pressure on ETH | 19 replies 96 retweets 363 likes | |
| 1289544537094856705 2020-08-01 05:52:30 -0700 <cryptochetty> @bradmillscan @AriDavidPaul back to your point around EIP-1559 | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1289608105228197888 2020-08-01 10:05:06 -0700 <CryptoSlate> Research firm: Ethereum 2.0 and EIP-1559 will boost ETH's long-term value proposition (via @n1ckchong) https://t.co/e1fCa8jRRV | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1289608827512397830 2020-08-01 10:07:58 -0700 <johnmorganFL> Research firm: #Ethereum 2.0 and EIP-1559 will boost #ETH’s long-term value proposition https://t.co/0iUgvHaFuY | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1289609409874636800 2020-08-01 10:10:17 -0700 <webnowcompany> Unlike Bitcoin, Ethereum has not earned the status of being a digital store of value. The post Research firm: Ethereum 2.0 and EIP-1559 will boost ETH&#821...Read more: https://t.co/CxjR1cfq93 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1289609605849341957 2020-08-01 10:11:04 -0700 <DevereWealth> Research firm: Ethereum 2.0 and EIP-1559 will boost ETH’s long-term value proposition https://t.co/Hxn88UQHgp #Analysis #ETH20 https://t.co/VutP4QgrBM | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1289609748833173505 2020-08-01 10:11:38 -0700 <Asliajay_> @hasufl Step 1: Create a highly pre-mined unscrupulous coin (which was never marketed as money) Step 2: EIP 1559. Lol | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1289614376949841921 2020-08-01 10:30:01 -0700 <CryptoNetDaily> Research firm: #Ethereum 2.0 and EIP-1559 will boost $ETH’s long-term value proposition https://t.co/rHes6bAcSE | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1289619923593859072 2020-08-01 10:52:04 -0700 <CRYPTO_KLV> $ETH Check this news: Research firm: Ethereum 2.0 and EIP-1559 will boost ETH’s long-term value proposition https://t.co/Q90tBtiig1 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1289620986719899648 2020-08-01 10:56:17 -0700 <thecryptorep> (Research firm: Ethereum 2.0 and EIP-1559 will boost ETH’s long-term value proposition) https://t.co/d8BbeVHRsL https://t.co/XyGwr4ab4I https://t.co/06wDxi9zH1 | 0 replies 1 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1289621154441777152 2020-08-01 10:56:57 -0700 <BRTcrpt> Research firm: Ethereum 2.0 and EIP-1559 will boost ETH's long-term value proposition | CryptoSlate https://t.co/YmHcSR6Z9d | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1289622239936012289 2020-08-01 11:01:16 -0700 <SoldForBitcoins> Research firm: Ethereum 2.0 and EIP-1559 will boost ETH’s long-term value proposition #bitcoin #trx #cryptocurrencymarket #cryptonews #dapp #decentralized #proofofwork #coinmarketcap https://t.co/iGXoRDRrb5 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1289622274090455047 2020-08-01 11:01:24 -0700 <CriptoPasion> Empresa de investigación: Ethereum 2.0 y EIP-1559 impulsarán la propuesta de valor a largo plazo de ETH - https://t.co/bQA9SrdwY3 #cryptocurrencies #criptomonedas #bitcoin #btc | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1289623422360645632 2020-08-01 11:05:58 -0700 <HodlersDigest> Research firm: Ethereum 2.0 and EIP-1559 will boost ETH’s long-term value proposition - https://t.co/iCRq1FzdG4 #Crypto #CryptoNews $BTC #ETH #Bitcoin | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1289626594630176768 2020-08-01 11:18:34 -0700 <cryptow1re> #ethtrader 🤖: Research firm: Ethereum 2.0 and EIP-1559 will boost ETH’s long-term value proposition https://t.co/Sk047mdKav | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1289626836868034560 2020-08-01 11:19:32 -0700 <cryptow1re> reddit 🤖: Research firm: Ethereum 2.0 and EIP-1559 will boost ETH’s long-term value proposition https://t.co/Df8JjKo6Td | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1289627211838959618 2020-08-01 11:21:02 -0700 <PaulESamson> Research firm: Ethereum 2.0 and EIP-1559 will boost ETH’s long-term value proposition - #Analysis #Eth20 #ETHUSD - https://t.co/GDua58VqMg https://t.co/B4IJhxHF8Y | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1289628852323483649 2020-08-01 11:27:33 -0700 <CryptoAbsorbed> Research firm: Ethereum 2.0 and EIP-1559 will boost ETH’s long-term value proposition https://t.co/nJZb44MneU | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1289630237131587585 2020-08-01 11:33:03 -0700 <ChainEXIO> Research firm: Ethereum 2.0 and EIP-1559 will boost ETH’s long-term value proposition https://t.co/okV2SeX7UK https://t.co/jeKwZL6RHC | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1289631624036929537 2020-08-01 11:38:34 -0700 <cliff_eth> @RyanSAdams Today, the $ETH asset is AT LEAST worth 10X its peak price in 2018. Based on fundamentals like dev community growth, maturity of projects, on-chain activity, etc. And we still have EIP 1559, staking, and v2 around the corner. $ETH is about to run more than $TSLA did. Much more. | 6 replies 6 retweets 64 likes | |
| 1289633382222057473 2020-08-01 11:45:33 -0700 <joedigitals> Research firm: Ethereum 2.0 and EIP-1559 will boost ETH’s long-term value proposition https://t.co/0SyDUImkHC | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1289641186764812289 2020-08-01 12:16:33 -0700 <CryptoGlazed> Research firm: Ethereum 2.0 and EIP-1559 will boost ETH’s long-term value proposition https://t.co/BAyWQ4G4DQ #Analysis #ETH20 #ETHUSD https://t.co/qE3zSgJKaJ | 0 replies 1 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1289641317492899840 2020-08-01 12:17:05 -0700 <das_grasshopper> EIP1559 and ETH2.0 will be total game changers. EIP-1559 represents an ultra low issuance of ETH in the near term, and the Serenity phase represents infinite scalability. We are truly in the presence of something of majestic scale being built #Ethereum https://t.co/0NHfqpKwRQ | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1289644406878822407 2020-08-01 12:29:21 -0700 <PumpMoonshot> Research firm: Ethereum 2.0 and EIP-1559 will boost ETH’s long-term value proposition - https://t.co/mpiLTQi9R8 Unlike Bitcoin, Ethereum has not earned the status of being a di... | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1289654090251739136 2020-08-01 13:07:50 -0700 <LeUnderground> @IslandHunting @antiprosynth @HODLHanger @lawmaster Yet Ethereum still can't fund EIP 1559 or decent bug rewards for ETH 2. https://t.co/wDqTSwnaRl https://t.co/WISD9uE382 | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1289654891749638144 2020-08-01 13:11:01 -0700 <rhbtoday> #Analysis #ETH20 #ETHUSD Research firm: Ethereum 2.0 and EIP-1559 will boost ETH’s long-term value proposition https://t.co/XPQnME4GHa | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1289660104594227200 2020-08-01 13:31:44 -0700 <LeUnderground> @IslandHunting @antiprosynth @HODLHanger @lawmaster It's all about selling your premine at the expense of your own buyers and supporters. Your whole point that the EF should have the money to fund things because of those 100M sold like EIP1559 without having to ask to the community. But instead the community still needs to fund it | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1289662141566316548 2020-08-01 13:39:49 -0700 <farmwell123> I'm long ETH calls till the end of the year so its important you know: -↑ Gas = ↑ WTP to use ETH by organic user base - ETH has tremendous value capture with advent of EIP1559 - ETH is the best L1 horse and its not close - Most promising developments all take place on Ethereum | 0 replies 0 retweets 7 likes | |
| 1289702373347082240 2020-08-01 16:19:41 -0700 <TheCoinRadar_> New post: The 1.x Files: EIP 1559 and the Ethereum Improvement Horizon https://t.co/HAltkjbpvk | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1289730131003494401 2020-08-01 18:09:59 -0700 <MRHRakib11> [Research Firm: Ethereum 2.0 And EIP-1559 Will Boost ETH's Long-Term Value Proposition] Delphi Digi... https://t.co/xeTX1TYBgA https://t.co/r4GuTy7eg5 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1289730188125691904 2020-08-01 18:10:13 -0700 <MRHRakib11> [Research Firm: Ethereum 2.0 And EIP-1559 Will Boost ETH's Long-Term Value Proposition] Delphi Digi... https://t.co/eGFOQXsB3K https://t.co/YrFAg8Qu1H | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1289746000421089281 2020-08-01 19:13:03 -0700 <cryptolincmag> EIP1559とは？イーサリアムの手数料モデルの抜本的変更の提案と価格への影響 https://t.co/icvjuXrwdX - Coin Choice #仮想通貨 #暗号資産 | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1289746369423392768 2020-08-01 19:14:31 -0700 <crypt_headline> EIP1559とは？イーサリアムの手数料モデルの抜本的変更の提案と価格への影響 https://t.co/NEbWxCA47U | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1289764554713509890 2020-08-01 20:26:47 -0700 <MorganTBennett> EIP-1559 contains two separate upgrades for #Ethereum: 1. Fee burn upgrade: - What it does: enshrine $ETH economic value at the protocol level. - Importance: mission-critical. - Implementation: trivial. | 2 replies 15 retweets 49 likes | |
| 1289764801963421696 2020-08-01 20:27:46 -0700 <virtualcoinjp> EIP1559とは？イーサリアムの手数料モデルの抜本的変更の提案と価格への影響 https://t.co/5xGnny1KKi | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1289774325235511296 2020-08-01 21:05:36 -0700 <scupytrooples> @kyled116 There will be even less to go around after EIP-1559 | 0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1289801674131779585 2020-08-01 22:54:17 -0700 <hooji2> @IamCryptoWolf BTC Halving: What if all the gold mines in the world cut production by 1/2. What would happen? ETH 2 + EIP 1559: What if all the gold mines in the world were permanently destroyed and 1/3 to 1/2 the world supply of gold were buried at the center of the Earth. What would happen? | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1289864026382467073 2020-08-02 03:02:03 -0700 <Crypto49ers> Ethereum 2.0 und EIP-1559 werden den langfristigen Wertbeitrag stärken https://t.co/QuNn5ug4PS | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1289865065974308864 2020-08-02 03:06:10 -0700 <degentwister> Defi and fees might not be bigger catalyst that proposed Eth 2.0 Phase 0. $ETH would have higher monetary premium post EIP-1559 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1289866141444132865 2020-08-02 03:10:27 -0700 <ICO_News_Blog> Ethereum 2.0 und EIP-1559 werden den langfristigen Wertbeitrag stärken https://t.co/bQVVJkZQwj | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1289866158020190209 2020-08-02 03:10:31 -0700 <coincornernews> Ethereum 2.0 und EIP-1559 werden den langfristigen Wertbeitrag stärken https://t.co/yBVAzqlN3O | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1289894545010724864 2020-08-02 05:03:19 -0700 <kwdnet> ほほぅ / “EIP1559とは？イーサリアムの手数料モデルの抜本的変更の提案と価格への影響 | CoinChoice” https://t.co/kBtNaX6cyb | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1289907003800748040 2020-08-02 05:52:49 -0700 <cryptow1re> #ethtrader 🤖: EIP-1559 will take this Moon mission to Mars https://t.co/7IU2P4uMtu | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1289907063351459840 2020-08-02 05:53:03 -0700 <cryptow1re> reddit 🤖: EIP-1559 will take this Moon mission to Mars https://t.co/aLLWnFXvDY | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1289957475848867840 2020-08-02 09:13:23 -0700 <arctechinc> @eip1559 ♥️ | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1289957858402922497 2020-08-02 09:14:54 -0700 <jansky_girl> @eip1559 You and me both! | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1289959051292442624 2020-08-02 09:19:38 -0700 <TrustlessState> The #Ethereum block that got mined right at the moment ETH price went from $415-$325 received 12.81 ETH in fees. The next subsequent blocks averaged ~6 ETH in fees each. With EIP1559, ETH price volatility will burn more ETH and Ethereum more secure | 10 replies 28 retweets 143 likes | |
| 1289959081596211200 2020-08-02 09:19:45 -0700 <nanexcool> @eip1559 @MakerDAO I'll try to add one. Won't be 100% accurate since anyone can update the OSM at the top of the hour and depends on how fast the tx is mined | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1289961017674326016 2020-08-02 09:27:27 -0700 <mymodl3> @eip1559 That’s how we started... with a Model 3. Just took delivery of Tesla #2 this week. Next goal is solar. #KeepingUpWithTheLockeFamily. | 1 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1289962168499109889 2020-08-02 09:32:01 -0700 <jansky_girl> @mymodl3 @eip1559 So many nice hashtags. | 1 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1289964495490527232 2020-08-02 09:41:16 -0700 <mymodl3> @jansky_girl @eip1559 Here’s another ... #LisaLockeismyidol because we know it takes two to make a #powercouple! | 2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1289966087132442626 2020-08-02 09:47:36 -0700 <jansky_girl> @mymodl3 @eip1559 Awww.♥️ | 0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1289966320235057152 2020-08-02 09:48:31 -0700 <arctechinc> @mymodl3 @jansky_girl @eip1559 https://t.co/yGASREEYSF | 0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1289967421030166528 2020-08-02 09:52:54 -0700 <teilocompany> @eip1559 :D | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1289971574624391169 2020-08-02 10:09:24 -0700 <tmccarthyv94> @TrustlessState Any idea on when this will be implemented? I think EIP1559 will make #ETH stronger. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1289973552829980672 2020-08-02 10:17:16 -0700 <realjohnmonarch> @adrianna_mdz @mdudas Fee is fine. It's a payment for a service - right now, to the miners. Later, to the staking nodes. EIP-1559 also changes the dynamic. | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1289975336902332422 2020-08-02 10:24:21 -0700 <Dalwitter_> @BitcoinScrooge @PaoloRebuffo Max supply is a meme.... EIP1559 will demonstrate how the inflationary model can be well managed by the governance of a blockchain | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1289977423413436416 2020-08-02 10:32:39 -0700 <cyber_hokie> Does anyone have an aggregate list of all the issues with ETH1 being worked on with some demonstrable progress (outside of ETH2 R&D). Things like eip-1559 (other fee market improvements), opcode repricing, state growth, (stateless Ethereum?), p2p improvements? Cc: @TimBeiko | 2 replies 2 retweets 9 likes | |
| 1289979118600085505 2020-08-02 10:39:23 -0700 <Crypt0Fit> @ReySantoscrypto Indeed. Also not many people know about the proposal EIP 1559... Burn, burn DYOR😉 | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1290001932279406593 2020-08-02 12:10:02 -0700 <NewsCryptoBot> Research firm: Ethereum 2.0 and EIP-1559 will boost ETH’s long-term value proposition https://t.co/0FY4ZvC4EF | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1290049612863033344 2020-08-02 15:19:30 -0700 <ChainLinkGod> @eip1559 @intocryptoast @iamDCinvestor How so? | 1 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1290050442731298816 2020-08-02 15:22:48 -0700 <ChainLinkGod> @eip1559 @intocryptoast @iamDCinvestor I'm talking about Compound, not Maker | 1 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1290051755552604160 2020-08-02 15:28:01 -0700 <ChainLinkGod> @eip1559 @intocryptoast @iamDCinvestor Compound is a money market, so yes you can get liquidated, they aren't exactly clear on what those values are, but they exist https://t.co/G3UYPe7hM3 | 1 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1290052544304001025 2020-08-02 15:31:09 -0700 <intocryptoast> @eip1559 @ChainLinkGod @iamDCinvestor @AzizJalel0 is this still up to date? https://t.co/oZxmPI6ma1 | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1290055924078370816 2020-08-02 15:44:35 -0700 <ChainLinkGod> @eip1559 @intocryptoast @iamDCinvestor Compound doesn't tell your liquidation price because you could be using multiple assets as collateral | 1 replies 0 retweets 7 likes | |
| 1290056547385487360 2020-08-02 15:47:03 -0700 <ChainLinkGod> @eip1559 @saixo_ Check out this article, staking isn't live yet but there is in-production usage today https://t.co/lOAZsranUT | 2 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1290056622858010625 2020-08-02 15:47:21 -0700 <ChainLinkGod> @eip1559 @saixo_ https://t.co/lLad2W2aCJ | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1290056684769968128 2020-08-02 15:47:36 -0700 <ChainLinkGod> @eip1559 @saixo_ This article is good as well to understand the scope https://t.co/HtWmxIFCM9 | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1290069578756890624 2020-08-02 16:38:50 -0700 <LefterisJP> @eip1559 @dmihal Well, like all choice it depends on what you did with what DAI. SAI won't work in many of the current DeFi protocols for liquidity providing, so if you used your DAI there you probably are more net positive than if you had held SAI. Plus ... if ETH falls so does SAI. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1290080619901272065 2020-08-02 17:22:42 -0700 <_Checkmatey_> @cryptoalpha_ @TrustlessState 21000 Gas at 1 gwei and $300 ETH is half the $ cost of the exact same transaction a at $600 ETH. If EIP1559 drives ETH price higher, surely this only amplifies the overall Tx cost for users? If no scaling can be achieved, this tells me data onchain is not long term feasible. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1290086475426455552 2020-08-02 17:45:59 -0700 <Crypto_Patoruzu> @eip1559 @ChainLinkGod @intocryptoast @iamDCinvestor The guys at @Instadapp give you liquidation price if you do it through their Dapp, one of the coolest ones ever. 👇🏾 https://t.co/nJc2mStyDE | 0 replies 0 retweets 7 likes | |
| 1290087547427622913 2020-08-02 17:50:14 -0700 <_Checkmatey_> @cryptoalpha_ @TrustlessState I never disputed this mate. Hence my original comment. Without scaling, EIP1559 burning ETH and pushing scarcity up makes transaction fees go UP not down. It makes the chain unuseable. Please reread my original question and get back to me. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1290102979794673664 2020-08-02 18:51:33 -0700 <btcjpyMarket> EIP1559とは？イ https://t.co/WSwJxxUqmV #btc #ビットコイン #bitcoin #仮想通貨 #cryptocurrency #jpy #暗号通貨 #ニュース | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1290152051243012096 2020-08-02 22:06:33 -0700 <CodingMark> @eip1559 @kkvr2823 @Tdot_hill @teslainvernon @TeslaGong @MFrunker @DriveTeslaca @trevlan006 @Kristennetten @TeslaMilton @WholeMarsBlog I use the frunk for smelly things. Everything else goes in the trunk. | 3 replies 1 retweets 14 likes | |
| 1290152310316777472 2020-08-02 22:07:35 -0700 <kkvr2823> @eip1559 @Tdot_hill @teslainvernon @TeslaGong @MFrunker @DriveTeslaca @trevlan006 @CodingMark @Kristennetten @TeslaMilton @WholeMarsBlog Yep im an Indian origin Canadian. Indian food is what i grew up on! Wont be giving that up | 1 replies 0 retweets 7 likes | |
| 1290152488595726336 2020-08-02 22:08:17 -0700 <TeslaGong> @kkvr2823 @eip1559 @Tdot_hill @teslainvernon @MFrunker @DriveTeslaca @trevlan006 @CodingMark @Kristennetten @TeslaMilton @WholeMarsBlog 🔥 | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1290152914472722433 2020-08-02 22:09:59 -0700 <TeslaGong> @CodingMark @eip1559 @kkvr2823 @Tdot_hill @teslainvernon @MFrunker @DriveTeslaca @trevlan006 @Kristennetten @TeslaMilton @WholeMarsBlog Same. Meat 🍖 🐟 and take away food go to frunk. Rest of grocery to the trunk . (We call the trunk - boot. Should we call frunk - Froot 😂 decisions and decisions !!) | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1290153067124465665 2020-08-02 22:10:35 -0700 <kkvr2823> @TeslaGong @CodingMark @eip1559 @Tdot_hill @teslainvernon @MFrunker @DriveTeslaca @trevlan006 @Kristennetten @TeslaMilton @WholeMarsBlog Lolol - frooti https://t.co/PoZoPojiEB | 2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1290153137039273984 2020-08-02 22:10:52 -0700 <TeslaGong> @kkvr2823 @CodingMark @eip1559 @Tdot_hill @teslainvernon @MFrunker @DriveTeslaca @trevlan006 @Kristennetten @TeslaMilton @WholeMarsBlog Ha ha ha ha ha | 0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1290154184671506432 2020-08-02 22:15:02 -0700 <teslainvernon> @CodingMark @eip1559 @kkvr2823 @Tdot_hill @TeslaGong @MFrunker @DriveTeslaca @trevlan006 @Kristennetten @TeslaMilton @WholeMarsBlog Same | 1 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1290154322903224320 2020-08-02 22:15:35 -0700 <kkvr2823> @teslainvernon @CodingMark @eip1559 @Tdot_hill @TeslaGong @MFrunker @DriveTeslaca @trevlan006 @Kristennetten @TeslaMilton @WholeMarsBlog Too new a vehicle to use frunk for smelly things yet | 1 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1290154590562705410 2020-08-02 22:16:38 -0700 <Kristennetten> @kkvr2823 @teslainvernon @CodingMark @eip1559 @Tdot_hill @TeslaGong @MFrunker @DriveTeslaca @trevlan006 @TeslaMilton @WholeMarsBlog I refuse to put smell things in my Tesla — what are you eating Mark?? | 4 replies 0 retweets 9 likes | |
| 1290154686343856128 2020-08-02 22:17:01 -0700 <kkvr2823> @Kristennetten @teslainvernon @CodingMark @eip1559 @Tdot_hill @TeslaGong @MFrunker @DriveTeslaca @trevlan006 @TeslaMilton @WholeMarsBlog Lolest | 0 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1290154828874706946 2020-08-02 22:17:35 -0700 <Kristennetten> @kkvr2823 @teslainvernon @CodingMark @eip1559 @Tdot_hill @TeslaGong @MFrunker @DriveTeslaca @trevlan006 @TeslaMilton @WholeMarsBlog Def not chapati | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1290154923334631428 2020-08-02 22:17:58 -0700 <teslainvernon> @Kristennetten @kkvr2823 @CodingMark @eip1559 @Tdot_hill @TeslaGong @MFrunker @DriveTeslaca @trevlan006 @TeslaMilton @WholeMarsBlog I consider any takeout food too smelly for the cabin therefore it goes in the frunk. | 1 replies 1 retweets 12 likes | |
| 1290155062317047808 2020-08-02 22:18:31 -0700 <Kristennetten> @teslainvernon @kkvr2823 @CodingMark @eip1559 @Tdot_hill @TeslaGong @MFrunker @DriveTeslaca @trevlan006 @TeslaMilton @WholeMarsBlog True ... | 1 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1290155103924547584 2020-08-02 22:18:41 -0700 <CodingMark> @Kristennetten @kkvr2823 @teslainvernon @eip1559 @Tdot_hill @TeslaGong @MFrunker @DriveTeslaca @trevlan006 @TeslaMilton @WholeMarsBlog Lol! I mean things like pizza, detailing towels, take out food, etc. 😅 | 1 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1290155261345165312 2020-08-02 22:19:18 -0700 <Kristennetten> @CodingMark @kkvr2823 @teslainvernon @eip1559 @Tdot_hill @TeslaGong @MFrunker @DriveTeslaca @trevlan006 @TeslaMilton @WholeMarsBlog Oh yes .. or Brussels sprouts | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1290157037444243456 2020-08-02 22:26:22 -0700 <CodingMark> @Kristennetten @teslainvernon @kkvr2823 @eip1559 @Tdot_hill @TeslaGong @MFrunker @DriveTeslaca @trevlan006 @TeslaMilton @WholeMarsBlog Unless it smells really good 😏, like croissants 🥐 or cookies 🍪 or coffee ☕. Those belong in the cabin. 🥰 | 3 replies 1 retweets 8 likes | |
| 1290158041753509888 2020-08-02 22:30:21 -0700 <Kristennetten> @CodingMark @teslainvernon @kkvr2823 @eip1559 @Tdot_hill @TeslaGong @MFrunker @DriveTeslaca @trevlan006 @TeslaMilton @WholeMarsBlog Croissants are delish | 0 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1290160166038454272 2020-08-02 22:38:48 -0700 <teslainvernon> @CodingMark @Kristennetten @kkvr2823 @eip1559 @Tdot_hill @TeslaGong @MFrunker @DriveTeslaca @trevlan006 @TeslaMilton @WholeMarsBlog Yes, definitely agree on those. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1290160195574759424 2020-08-02 22:38:55 -0700 <CaptainVoni> @CodingMark @Kristennetten @teslainvernon @kkvr2823 @eip1559 @Tdot_hill @TeslaGong @MFrunker @DriveTeslaca @trevlan006 @TeslaMilton @WholeMarsBlog Croissants usually don't make it back to the car, though. At least not for me... | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1290160314441273344 2020-08-02 22:39:23 -0700 <Kristennetten> @CaptainVoni @CodingMark @teslainvernon @kkvr2823 @eip1559 @Tdot_hill @TeslaGong @MFrunker @DriveTeslaca @trevlan006 @TeslaMilton @WholeMarsBlog They are kinda messy haha | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1290161175116701699 2020-08-02 22:42:48 -0700 <CaptainVoni> @Kristennetten @CodingMark @teslainvernon @kkvr2823 @eip1559 @Tdot_hill @TeslaGong @MFrunker @DriveTeslaca @trevlan006 @TeslaMilton @WholeMarsBlog Yes! It is totally their fault that they magically disappear between the store and the car! | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1290175573705109504 2020-08-02 23:40:01 -0700 <FigoETH> @zhusu Quite hard to understand these standpoints with ETH being the enabler of the DeFi cambrian explosion by providing necessary security guarantees. Benefiting now from DeFi lockup and speculation; soon from PoS (assume very attractive for institutions when matured) and EIP 1559 🤷♂️ | 1 replies 0 retweets 10 likes | |
| 1290178914099163136 2020-08-02 23:53:18 -0700 <chouruonna> ビットコインステーション : EIP1559とは？イーサリアムの手数料モデルの抜本的変更の提案と価格への影響 https://t.co/x2dGnkpV2P | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1290184281365635073 2020-08-03 00:14:37 -0700 <FigoETH> Simply explanation for ETH: USD on steroids. - very likely reserve currency of future global DeFi ecosystem providing necessary security guarantees - Earning interest in future PoS 3-5% - issuance 0,5 % around 2025, less with EIP 1559 - premium collateral within DeFi ecosystem | 4 replies 16 retweets 89 likes | |
| 1290184984116903937 2020-08-03 00:17:25 -0700 <JoeBGrech> EIP1559 is bullish for $ETH | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1290195813923082242 2020-08-03 01:00:27 -0700 <defitimes> @antiprosynth EIP 1559 will result in net negative issuance, while maintaining an extremely secure network. #Ethereum monetary policy is in theory the best humanity has ever come up with. | 1 replies 5 retweets 37 likes | |
| 1290197585563512832 2020-08-03 01:07:29 -0700 <defitimes> EIP 1559 will be a game changer. | 0 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1290212346426662918 2020-08-03 02:06:09 -0700 <CryptoMonday> 📰 Ethereum 2.0 und EIP-1559 werden den langfristigen Wert von ETH als Store of Value steigern https://t.co/Csbh0mru1a #EIP1559 #ETH #Ethereum #Ethereum20 #Stakting | 1 replies 1 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1290212495315963905 2020-08-03 02:06:44 -0700 <ICO_News_Blog> Ethereum 2.0 und EIP-1559 werden den langfristigen Wert von ETH als Store of Value steigern https://t.co/H7lHqqcgTZ | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1290212506879885312 2020-08-03 02:06:47 -0700 <coincornernews> Ethereum 2.0 und EIP-1559 werden den langfristigen Wert von ETH als Store of Value steigern https://t.co/AFdTEF8n1C | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1290222605958615040 2020-08-03 02:46:55 -0700 <OfficialABQ> @CodingMark @eip1559 @kkvr2823 @Tdot_hill @teslainvernon @TeslaGong @MFrunker @DriveTeslaca @trevlan006 @Kristennetten @TeslaMilton @WholeMarsBlog I use the frunk for everything that fits in the frunk. The trunk is secondary. The hooks are helpful to keep food and other loose items in bags from rolling around in the frunk. | 0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1290227759160188928 2020-08-03 03:07:23 -0700 <PaoloRebuffo> It's happening fast, #dex are skyrocketing, #DeFi is exploding, #eip1559 and #Eth2 are on their way. All that value on chain. #ethereumRulez and the flippening on $BTC is just obvious. More #soon than you think. | 0 replies 1 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1290244260336287745 2020-08-03 04:12:57 -0700 <AzizJalel0> @intocryptoast @eip1559 @ChainLinkGod @iamDCinvestor didn't update it in a while but should work perfectly | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1290247125125623813 2020-08-03 04:24:20 -0700 <etienne_here> @CryptoMonday Sinnloser Artikel. Die Kernaussage wird mehrfach wiederholt, ohne dass sie erläutert wird und ohne dass erklärt wird, was EIP-1559 beinhaltet. Vielleicht etwas mehr Mühe geben? | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1290249274458951680 2020-08-03 04:32:53 -0700 <JoeBGrech> @altugozturk @alex_dreyfus @binance Actually, Ethereum will likely have a burn mechanism very soon. Look at EIP-1559 :) | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1290255338416070657 2020-08-03 04:56:59 -0700 <hasufl> @MorganTBennett @danfinlay @JHancock @TimBeiko @peter_szilagyi @poojaranjan19 @econoar @VitalikButerin yeah, EIP-1559 is a hot mess in terms of complexity and how many parts of Ethereum it touches. we tried to explain the design rationale here (which imo does make sense, it just takes some chewing) https://t.co/YJOwcXe3DA | 1 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1290261451748159489 2020-08-03 05:21:16 -0700 <Crypto_Gone_> Research firm: Ethereum 2.0 and EIP-1559 will boost ETH's long-term value proposition | CryptoSlate https://t.co/ioTU7dZvAk | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1290281751562993665 2020-08-03 06:41:56 -0700 <AaronsTake> There is not a fixed amount of rain that can ever fall onto the Sahara desert, and yet, water there is scarce. Pass this on in hopes that a $BTC maximalist that you care about will better understand scarcity. #ETH #EIP1559 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1290288349161205760 2020-08-03 07:08:09 -0700 <hooji2> @IamCryptoWolf EIP 1559 + ETH 2 + DiFi is like: 1) Destroying all gold mines. 2) Putting 1/3-1/2 of existing gold back in the earth. 3) Releasing a microbe that gradually eats remaining gold. Price goes where? | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1290340808219033602 2020-08-03 10:36:36 -0700 <josephjpeters> @gaborgurbacs @TheStalwart More fees will lead to more ETH being burned (when EIP 1559 is implemented) putting pressure in the annual inflation rate. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1290345920463343616 2020-08-03 10:56:55 -0700 <hausbauss> @parman_the @eddmeadows 1) This inflation rate is roughly equivalent to that of BTC. 2) This figure does not account for EIP 1559 whereby a portion of tx fees are irreversibly burned Given that ETH already settles more value daily than BTC, it’s inflation will likely end up lower than BTC ...So yes. | 3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1290374447661187073 2020-08-03 12:50:16 -0700 <DlyCoin> Research firm: Ethereum 2.0 and EIP-1559 will boost ETH’s long-term value proposition https://t.co/Pcyyhdya3P | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1290382333149773825 2020-08-03 13:21:37 -0700 <alexgausman> @iamDCinvestor I'm not very adept w finance, but I'm of the opinion that quantitative evaluations should be rooted in earnings. So, for ETH I would start with PoS fee capture and EIP-1559 fee capture. From there we can say acceptable P/E for investors is about 50 these days... 1/x | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1290407650983739392 2020-08-03 15:02:13 -0700 <piyopiyo_crypto> EIP1559とは？イーサリアムの手数料モデルの抜本的変更の提案と価格への影響 https://t.co/pGEtSEwFfl @coin_choiceから | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1290411746616909830 2020-08-03 15:18:29 -0700 <panekkkk> @eip1559 https://t.co/TXWbqPcjBH | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1290412623465451525 2020-08-03 15:21:58 -0700 <panekkkk> @eip1559 At max there are 45.3k https://t.co/F45fVgDq9p https://t.co/drndc7Hs90 | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1290417940974710786 2020-08-03 15:43:06 -0700 <CryptoADavid> @hugofirefreire @TheCryptoDog @themaderfader Btc hits 100k, even eth at .03btc is $3000 🤫. Most likely .05+, $5000 $ETH price after pos goes live and if Eip 1559 hits loookouuttt | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1290424717065715714 2020-08-03 16:10:02 -0700 <NewsCryptoBot> Research firm: Ethereum 2.0 and EIP-1559 will boost ETH’s long-term value proposition https://t.co/0FY4ZvTG3f | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1290457851694022656 2020-08-03 18:21:42 -0700 <AlexMasmej> @econoar @iamtexture Do one where people burn ETH to get $ERIC EIP1559 Personal Tokens ftw | 0 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1290471006251950081 2020-08-03 19:13:58 -0700 <alexgausman> @Brad_Laurie Thanks Brad! I think ETH is great risk/reward. It's capturing over $1M/day in fees, which will be directed to ETH holders in the future with staking + eip-1559. Lots of potential, but would also hate to miss out on a defi-alt-coin moon shoot, so good to have some of both :) | 0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1290503521163501568 2020-08-03 21:23:10 -0700 <ChainNewscom> 【Vitalik Buterin：探讨二次方融资收入稳定性与合谋问题】第六轮 Gitcoin Grants 近七百个项目获得 40 万美元资金，EIP 1559 社区基金成为技术类别出乎意料的大赢家。 https://t.co/OazPmu2MWW | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1290555085387440128 2020-08-04 00:48:04 -0700 <Fiskantes> @_metagroove Ethereum is a widely adopted protocol. Ethereum generates fees. After EIP 1559 fees will accrue to ETH token holders. Am I missing something? | 2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1290572303038906368 2020-08-04 01:56:29 -0700 <_metagroove> @Fiskantes Let me clarify what I'm trying to say. I may have responded out of context and we're both actually on the same page. Firstly, I like EIP-1559 and it makes sense to me. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1290594927802347522 2020-08-04 03:26:23 -0700 <MarlinProtocol> Though EIP 1559 helps in adjusting the capacity of blocks to increase throughput during demand spikes by borrowing block space from future blocks, it is unclear if EIP 1559 alone can help with the high gas prices in the Ethereum network. | 0 replies 7 retweets 15 likes | |
| 1290611359755821057 2020-08-04 04:31:41 -0700 <degentwister> Most liquid coin with which most trades are executed on DEX is $ETH and still you think $ETH do not have monetary premium. EIP-1559 is cherry on the cake as it will significantly boost $ETH monetary premium. | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1290660633281781772 2020-08-04 07:47:28 -0700 <SkyHODL> ETH 2.0 and EIP1559 Staking coins with 4% to 10% earnings is huge. Add to that a coin supply burn and you get a huge ROI. 32 ETH is the minimum required to stake. Imagine ETH at $10,000, stakers need to buy up $32,000 worth of ETH causing ETH price to increase. #ETH #Ethereum | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1290692374834937856 2020-08-04 09:53:36 -0700 <TheCoinRadar_> New post: The 1.x Files: EIP 1559 and the Ethereum Improvement Horizon https://t.co/HAltkjt0TU | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1290700527903399936 2020-08-04 10:26:00 -0700 <CryptoEcon_Li> The #DeFi boom would directly benefit $ETH, esp. under #EIP1559. If a large #institutional investor wants exposure to #DeFi, it would likely buy $ETH, b/c: 1. DeFi market cap is still too small. 2. DeFi apps are still early, complicated and hard to pick winners | 0 replies 1 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1290701533676363780 2020-08-04 10:30:00 -0700 <EDCON_Official> Will EIP-1559 be able to solve the #Ethereum gas fee pressure? Meet Tomasz @tkstanczak from @nethermindeth at #EDCON2020 on August 10th, you will have the answer. Don't miss out >> https://t.co/LVdheFt09m #ETH #Blockchain https://t.co/r4dpwK3l1C | 0 replies 1 retweets 9 likes | |
| 1290704289027907584 2020-08-04 10:40:57 -0700 <Cryptodose_co> ETH 2.0 and EIP-1559 contributes to Ethereum's Long Term Value Proposition https://t.co/SMMYj7chDG | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1290758677452881922 2020-08-04 14:17:04 -0700 <iTrustCapital> @davidgokhshtein We heard that value accrues to ETH holders under PoS and EIP-1559 https://t.co/2Al7lhW9Q4 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1290812555334754305 2020-08-04 17:51:09 -0700 <DaxTaran> @Modernfarmer1 @evan_van_ness In Eth2 with EIP1559 implemented. Below 0.5% annual issuance, possibly 0% or even negative if there's enough economic activity burning ETH. | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1290862602390732800 2020-08-04 21:10:02 -0700 <NewsCryptoBot> Research firm: Ethereum 2.0 and EIP-1559 will boost ETH’s long-term value proposition https://t.co/0FY4ZvTG3f | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1290866265469353985 2020-08-04 21:24:35 -0700 <Crypto_Foo> @LNJunkies EIP 1559 | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1290906023423815680 2020-08-05 00:02:34 -0700 <coinyon> With EIP-1559 it will feel so much better to pay high ETH fees (as an ETH holder), because a portion of it will be burned. | 0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1290925529726685187 2020-08-05 01:20:05 -0700 <AttestantIO> @EthereumMemes @sassal0x ... EIP-1559 fixes this | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1290959080396382208 2020-08-05 03:33:24 -0700 <c771e2ee9be6448> @marcfriedrich7 Issuance of Ethereum will be below BTC after EIP 1559 implementation | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1290995644849676293 2020-08-05 05:58:41 -0700 <ZET_Tech> @Bentyn EIP 1559 already not implemented yet. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1291105052984135681 2020-08-05 13:13:26 -0700 <alexgausman> People have been waking up to the power of tokenomics like $SNX, $LINK, $RUNE, and even EIP-1559 all of which encourage feedback loops. And as a result, many teams are implementing new ways for token stakers to service users (such as Aave's proposed Safety Module). | 1 replies 0 retweets 9 likes | |
| 1291169901831389184 2020-08-05 17:31:08 -0700 <RyanTheGentry> @VitalikButerin @hasufl Not if you disagree with the hard fork but want to remain on the majority chain! What say do they have? What if the devs pushing the hard fork are wrong about the outcome and it goes sideways like the dissenters warned? I guess we'll see soon with EIP-1559... | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1291228751452233729 2020-08-05 21:24:58 -0700 <GroundFrost> @TheCryptoDog Not until EIP 1559 and Phase 0 imo | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1291356944779956224 2020-08-06 05:54:22 -0700 <Professor2234> @TronHODLSeattle @TruthRaiderHQ @VitalikButerin @justinsuntron @adam3us @Crypto_Bitlord @realmaxkeiser @KeiserReport @officialmcafee @SniperZero @gavinandresen @Blockstream @Excellion That’s what 2.0 is for EIP 1559... ETH isn’t going anywhere.. | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1291363790743719938 2020-08-06 06:21:34 -0700 <Badboybubby5> @DragonDeesSats @VitalikButerin In theory with proof of stake issuance and EIP1559 ethereum will be less inflationary then BTC . It may even decrease every year . | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1291373460556398593 2020-08-06 07:00:00 -0700 <EthMagicians> Recordings from our Summer Sessions are live! 📽️ Social Governance https://t.co/b7bdswzSyf @TheEther2077 EIP Improvement Proposals https://t.co/ORXmVud7AL @EthCatHerders @relativeread @poojaranjan19 EIP1559 https://t.co/JaxBAe3HxL @danfinlay @barnabemonnot @TimBeiko | 2 replies 9 retweets 8 likes | |
| 1291385958768795650 2020-08-06 07:49:40 -0700 <defitimes> Imagine the price effect of EIP 1559 😎 https://t.co/Lptlwl7Qub | 0 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1291464318412886017 2020-08-06 13:01:02 -0700 <EthMagicians> We are sorry we have technical issues with the EIP1559 recording. We will repost it again. We are sorry about it, we are working on this technical issues | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1291476775864799237 2020-08-06 13:50:32 -0700 <notgrubles> @NTmoney @taha_zafar12 Vitalik is a maximalist in practice. How many times has he claimed EOS or NEO or other projects are scams. The latest EIP-1559 (authored by Vitalik) is incredibly maximalist as well since it forces people to use ETH to pay for tx fees instead of say USDT. | 2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1291677944520282112 2020-08-07 03:09:54 -0700 <nethermindeth> #EDCON2020 is just days away 🥳 Have you reserved your ticket yet? Our Founder @tkstanczak's talk on #Ethereum Gas Price ⛽️ Markets with EIP-1559 is taking place Monday at 2:10 PM EDT. You'll want to tune in for this one! | 0 replies 3 retweets 14 likes | |
| 1291702568704516096 2020-08-07 04:47:45 -0700 <webnowcompany> #ETH #DEFI #BTC #STORM #GAS #NET Ethereum’s native asset, Ether, has outperformed Bitcoin by over 50% in 2020. With growth drivers in the form of DeFi, EIP 1559, and ETH 2.0, this trend is...Read more: https://t.co/5gZNCA0fdH | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1291767780690104321 2020-08-07 09:06:53 -0700 <TimBeiko> While we're on community calls, the next EIP-1559 Implementers' Call has been scheduled for Aug. 28th, 15:00 UTC 🔥 Agenda: https://t.co/3Pc24p0ihY It won't be live streamed but we'll post the zoom recording right after to the @ethereum YT channel 📺 | 0 replies 6 retweets 23 likes | |
| 1291795856765652994 2020-08-07 10:58:27 -0700 <taha_zafar12> All the graph shows is that Ethereum's issuance rate is going down. Once EIP 1559 is implemented, it can even become deflationary, in some cases. This is in line with the "minimum viable issuance" policy. #Ethereum | 2 replies 0 retweets 9 likes | |
| 1291848435713236993 2020-08-07 14:27:23 -0700 <shahmaul> @DonDurrett @RyanSAdams If EIP-1559 passes, ETH issuance will be extremely low and with a huge demand for ETH by dapps on ethereum network ... ETH is like silver that has industrial use and monetary properties | 0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1291872115008794624 2020-08-07 16:01:28 -0700 <taarushv> @udiWertheimer @VitalikButerin ETH fees burnt after eip 1559 > issuance inflation via PoS block reward, serving as a better indicator of chain security than 21M cap. (at least, my interpretation of the tweet) | 1 replies 0 retweets 12 likes | |
| 1291875863798087680 2020-08-07 16:16:22 -0700 <notgrubles> Well you could just modify the issuance rate or some other monetary knob for this to happen regardless -- which EIP 1559 is literally an example of -- so I think it's a nothingburger. | 1 replies 0 retweets 11 likes | |
| 1291904837060362242 2020-08-07 18:11:30 -0700 <Ethprofit> @VitalikButerin I think having EIP-1559 would incentivize everyone not just validators. But incentivize usage and reduce inflation. It's a win win for all. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1291907848234909696 2020-08-07 18:23:28 -0700 <VitalikButerin> @Excellion If the chain dies, the coin dies. So IMO ensuring a minimum level of security of the chain, through a minimum coin issuance (which can be clawed back with EIP 1559-like techniques if there's usage), is the correct path. | 10 replies 22 retweets 218 likes | |
| 1291909537285337088 2020-08-07 18:30:10 -0700 <AlexSaundersAU> BTC maxis are concerned about $ETH supply because #EIP1559 threatens their stock to flow scarcity crown. This is why it's important for $BTC to keep innovating. Schnorr, Taproot, MAST, Dandelion & other technical improvements are huge value add opportunities for #Bitcoin. 🤓🪙👑 https://t.co/woKVYdZJFj | 18 replies 16 retweets 130 likes | |
| 1291913988431912960 2020-08-07 18:47:52 -0700 <notgrubles> Who are we kidding. If there's an accounting error and more ETH was made than expected, Vitalik can just tell everyone to start burning some amount of ETH for transaction fees or something. Oh wait that's what EIP 1559 is? | 2 replies 0 retweets 27 likes | |
| 1291914211547914243 2020-08-07 18:48:45 -0700 <notgrubles> What if EIP 1559 is a stealth fix for silent inflation? @pierre_rochard | 2 replies 1 retweets 12 likes | |
| 1291916219470159872 2020-08-07 18:56:44 -0700 <Whyrusleeping> The next reset of the Filecoin testnet will include an implementation of EIP1559. I think its a critical improvement to the block space auction, very excited to see how it performs under real load. | 5 replies 42 retweets 219 likes | |
| 1291916219549798401 2020-08-07 18:56:44 -0700 <privateid_ntity> @AlexSaundersAU I read this analysis of #EIP1559 https://t.co/RVMP86PN4j and it seems like it just effects gas prices and has a variable blocksize. How does this relate to stock to flow? | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1291932307377422339 2020-08-07 20:00:39 -0700 <rajeshns87> @VitalikButerin When EIP 1559 done? | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1291932874317455360 2020-08-07 20:02:54 -0700 <digi_banc> @kevinsekniqi @SoundBenefit That is soon to be fixed within a year with EIP 1559, ETH2, zk rollups and then sharding. So devs would give up all the benefits provided by Ethereum for what? 1 year max of all these benefits at cheaper costs? Your business plan sucks! | 2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1291942146723938304 2020-08-07 20:39:45 -0700 <_jamiis> @notgrubles You're implying EF/developers know there is an inflation bug but aren't telling anyone so they came up with EIP-1559 to secretly fix it before people find out. No? | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1291943181584662528 2020-08-07 20:43:52 -0700 <notgrubles> @_jamiis Well I'm saying it's a possibility. Vitalik himself admits he only has a rough idea as to what the total supply is...despite authoring the supply cap proposal and more recently EIP 1559 which further alters the issuance rate. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1291953708217954306 2020-08-07 21:25:42 -0700 <econoar> Filecoin experimenting with eip1559. | 3 replies 11 retweets 98 likes | |
| 1291959605413568513 2020-08-07 21:49:08 -0700 <aeyakovenko> eip1559 is still building in a world where blockspace is scarce. Cost per message to the user should be a small multiple of (msg bytes * $50/terabyte * number of validators) (cont) | 2 replies 1 retweets 18 likes | |
| 1291961608898404353 2020-08-07 21:57:05 -0700 <DeFi_Dad> @eip1559 @cburniske Thanks guys. 🥰 | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1291962247489544192 2020-08-07 21:59:37 -0700 <CoffeeTimesTW> FilecoinテストネットでEIP1559の実装予定 手数料がバーンされるモデル | 0 replies 0 retweets 8 likes | |
| 1291969624301428736 2020-08-07 22:28:56 -0700 <udon_crypto> EIP1559はConstant Block Rewardとセット | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1291972820000366592 2020-08-07 22:41:38 -0700 <1407shakir> @Whyrusleeping @VitalikButerin When it will be implement things are going very very worst for gas fees....... This is really Unexpectable... Implementation of EIP 1559 soonest of the soonest.. | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1291973105754103810 2020-08-07 22:42:46 -0700 <1407shakir> @VitalikButerin When it will be implement things are going very very worst for gas fees....... This is really Unexpectable... Implementation of EIP 1559 soonest of the soonest.. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1291988065448157185 2020-08-07 23:42:13 -0700 <blueavm> Experiments with eip 1559. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1292023347698470914 2020-08-08 02:02:25 -0700 <genesisblock101> @eip1559 @IvanOnTech Ivan on pants 😂🤣 | 0 replies 0 retweets 7 likes | |
| 1292024302531801088 2020-08-08 02:06:13 -0700 <genesisblock101> @eip1559 @IvanOnTech We only see him wearing a T-shirt. 😂 Do you peeps think that he wear pants during live-streams? 🤔😝 | 1 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1292026690730897409 2020-08-08 02:15:42 -0700 <DaniMesqEN> @wekabot @_prestwich @mysticryuujin @JaEsf @Jack_Russell_UK Will it be used in EIP-1559? @1inchExchange does a similar approach to burn CHI gas tokens. I wish more contracts implements it. @argentHQ, when the wallets will have a upgrade to start using CHI? Pls read this very important thread: https://t.co/fpAAbQAn0I | 2 replies 1 retweets 7 likes | |
| 1292028681049841665 2020-08-08 02:23:36 -0700 <CushtyCrypto> @eip1559 @IvanOnTech PoBBP | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1292028952010268672 2020-08-08 02:24:41 -0700 <crypto_sjk> @eip1559 @IvanOnTech This guy is a freaking legend, love him | 0 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1292033570941423616 2020-08-08 02:43:02 -0700 <AlgorithmicBot> @VitalikButerin May I humbly ask someone to explain to me the part where Vitalik starts to talk about the tx fees? I am aware of EIP-1559 but hadn't dug deeper to thoroughly understand it, just yet. Thank you. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1292035808053137408 2020-08-08 02:51:56 -0700 <DaniMesqEN> @k06a @1inchExchange @wekabot @_prestwich @mysticryuujin @JaEsf @Jack_Russell_UK @argentHQ I also hope ppl forgets GST2; that makes me question: why the market sees more value on that than on CHI? Seems like they don't do the care it deserves, but with @emilianobonassi's thread it will become the standard. But yes, L1 need EIP1559, which will be bullish for ETH. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1292037257256407042 2020-08-08 02:57:41 -0700 <JohanPoyhonen> @eip1559 @IvanOnTech BBP for life. | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1292038131311681542 2020-08-08 03:01:10 -0700 <Vlada682> @eip1559 @IvanOnTech 😅😻😍😅😻😍 | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1292038411533070337 2020-08-08 03:02:16 -0700 <cryptochad1337> @knutsvanholm A portion of the fees will be burned if EIP 1559 gets into Ethereum 2.0 what he means is that more will be burned than created for the validators. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1292038644375662592 2020-08-08 03:03:12 -0700 <CryptoEcon_Li> #EIP1559 👀 🌈 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1292042357542653952 2020-08-08 03:17:57 -0700 <k06a> Would you trust @VitalikButerin if he would say #EIP1559 would fix everything? #DeFi | 4 replies 1 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1292042460600905732 2020-08-08 03:18:22 -0700 <stonecoldpat0> @wekabot @_prestwich @JaEsf @mysticryuujin @Jack_Russell_UK Does this mean if we reconfigured nodes to send fees to a predetermined contract address, then we could deploy eip-1559 without a hard fork? 😇eg send fees, periodically deploy and selfdestruct the contract (CREATE2). | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1292043906541064192 2020-08-08 03:24:06 -0700 <Johanolssonn> @eip1559 @IvanOnTech BIGBOOOOYPANTS! AMEN 🙌 | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1292045387126120450 2020-08-08 03:29:59 -0700 <SellDip> @eip1559 @IvanOnTech https://t.co/QzYzalYIoX | 0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1292045808091762688 2020-08-08 03:31:40 -0700 <HR92527699> @eip1559 @IvanOnTech He’s funny without trying to be | 0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1292060754099789824 2020-08-08 04:31:03 -0700 <TheCoinKing1980> @eip1559 @DabskiZIL @IvanOnTech That Ivan guy he's so cool and he got that cool.acxent ..kinda like Arnold Schwarnegger ...hurry get to the chopper https://t.co/LV95mqNWB2 | 0 replies 0 retweets 6 likes | |
| 1292061321316491265 2020-08-08 04:33:18 -0700 <MatthewdeKlerk1> @eip1559 @IvanOnTech BBP policy! We should get a #BBPPolicy trending 😂 | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1292068762091388928 2020-08-08 05:02:53 -0700 <austerity_sucks> @alistairmilne the thing that i find so surprising is that so many eth maxis are super pumped about EIP-1559 (i am too, because i hold ETH), but they are supposed to be in it for the tech, and expensive gas and pumping price is not good for "world computer for dapps" | 2 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1292069537425367041 2020-08-08 05:05:57 -0700 <jjjbtc> @austerity_sucks @alistairmilne PoS and EIP-1559 are the reasons I hold some Eth. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1292069929982857218 2020-08-08 05:07:31 -0700 <Butta_eth> @austerity_sucks @alistairmilne EIP 1559 is supposed to solve a UX problem and burning is the side effect. This part of EIP1559 hasn’t reached Crypto Twitter tho, ...you’d need to join and read the research chats. | 2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1292074270508625921 2020-08-08 05:24:46 -0700 <PacoLimited> @eip1559 @IvanOnTech https://t.co/Z2dPHAvajR | 0 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1292090517317189634 2020-08-08 06:29:19 -0700 <hausbauss> @parman_the @pierre_rochard @VitalikButerin This is tangential, but I’m genuinely curious here: What do you make of this estimation showing that with very high likelihood ETH (under both PoS and EIP 1559) will have formally negative inflation. Burned fees will be more than block rewards. https://t.co/FpRCSkviMM | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1292093720200978432 2020-08-08 06:42:03 -0700 <CidBeeyor> @eip1559 @IvanOnTech 😂 | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1292095287968829440 2020-08-08 06:48:17 -0700 <IvoZ3RO> @eip1559 @IvanOnTech a micro gesture at 0:39 tells he feel uncomfortable because of the lie. lol | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1292097243890278400 2020-08-08 06:56:03 -0700 <iamDCinvestor> Fee burning through EIP-1559 will reduce or practically eliminate reliance on forced dilution to pay for network security. Forced dilution on Bitcoin will end when issuance equals zero, but then what? Fees magically provide uninterrupted security? Makes no sense to me. 🤷♂️ | 2 replies 0 retweets 14 likes | |
| 1292099063870038019 2020-08-08 07:03:17 -0700 <Philastru> @iamDCinvestor When will eip-1559 be implemented? Is there a date-timeline? | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1292104852177379330 2020-08-08 07:26:17 -0700 <DoubleNSC> @Thomasl37778470 @pmrcunha @saurabhbhalla90 @APompliano @BTCCATTRADER I agree it is currently inflationary. However, based on current usage and the specifications for Proof-of-Stake / ETH 2.0, including EIP-1559 fee burn proposal, it will very likely be a deflationary currency. Increasing utility and constrained supply = $ETH 🚀 #Flippening🐬 | 1 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1292111359191191552 2020-08-08 07:52:08 -0700 <tantrumTNT> @eip1559 @IvanOnTech Big boy pants are must have. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1292117523140423680 2020-08-08 08:16:38 -0700 <CosmonautHex> @eip1559 @IvanOnTech #bbp are on all the way to #BPD #hex baby! #5555High | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1292120705149087744 2020-08-08 08:29:17 -0700 <DoubleNSC> @pmrcunha @Thomasl37778470 @saurabhbhalla90 @APompliano @BTCCATTRADER Right now: (1) ETH supply is increasing (inflationary at approx. 3.7%) (2) Current txn fees paid > 2k ETH/day since May Future with PoS and EIP1559: (1) Much lower inflation rate (0.5-1%) (2) Fees are burned Result = ETH likely deflationary $ETH https://t.co/1jcuDYHRKm | 1 replies 7 retweets 16 likes | |
| 1292126942854967300 2020-08-08 08:54:04 -0700 <CryptoChillbear> @VitalikButerin @antiprosynth @Excellion @VitalikButerin Just pass EIP 1559 already....feels like an $eth ernity 🤣 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1292128250135826432 2020-08-08 08:59:16 -0700 <dmihal> @econoar We really need a better name than "EIP-1559", especially as other projects start looking into it. "Deterministic fee markets"? | 2 replies 1 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1292133537735352320 2020-08-08 09:20:16 -0700 <rajeshns87> Analysis of EIP-1559 - Deribit Insights https://t.co/OwdzdeNR56 | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1292137955746877440 2020-08-08 09:37:50 -0700 <NetMaximalist> @eip1559 @IvanOnTech https://t.co/molxTMe74O | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1292139652565151752 2020-08-08 09:44:34 -0700 <DastardlyDaniel> EIP-1559 is 100% make or break for Ethereum. Inconsistent gas pricing is the main issue. You can submit a TX just for the network usage to spike and never see that TX confirm. | 1 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1292155750085779457 2020-08-08 10:48:32 -0700 <CryptoCoffee07> @eip1559 @IvanOnTech Ivan aka drama queen. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1292163104147755008 2020-08-08 11:17:45 -0700 <ErikSjoqvist> @eip1559 @IvanOnTech Is my new favourite concept, ”klockrent” | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1292163382485770240 2020-08-08 11:18:52 -0700 <TonyRod30997452> @eip1559 @IvanOnTech love it. Its true though. Gotta have those 🤣BIG BOY PANTS😂 | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1292163565088989185 2020-08-08 11:19:35 -0700 <Jose92796673> @eip1559 @IvanOnTech @IvanOnTech please confirm you have Big Boy pants and that you have free-claimed your $HEX! | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1292170466921074688 2020-08-08 11:47:01 -0700 <stormpking> @eip1559 @IvanOnTech His answer to my question 😂😂 | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1292192317328195584 2020-08-08 13:13:50 -0700 <notgrubles> @CarstenBKK @ljxie @RSKsmart It boils down to greed. No one cares about innovation. They care about what pumps ETH. EIP 1559 is a perfect example of that, in that it is a proposal to burn ETH and also(quoting the proposal) "cements ETH economically within Ethereum" so that no other asset can be used for fees | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1292218580512063488 2020-08-08 14:58:12 -0700 <stormpking> @SupiriMinisa @eip1559 @IvanOnTech Definitely not 😂😂 | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1292241652870868993 2020-08-08 16:29:53 -0700 <Nostranomist> @eip1559 @IvanOnTech Honestly I watch these episodes and I’m just dying | 1 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1292258678750486533 2020-08-08 17:37:32 -0700 <ZakionBitcoin> @eip1559 @IvanOnTech https://t.co/Fu7h9eDPfM | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1292287761752272896 2020-08-08 19:33:06 -0700 <DeFi_Dad> @rodrigopacini @APompliano @renprotocol You gotta check out EIP1559. Ethereum’s monetary policy has made huge strides the last few years. The markets finally realizing it. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1292292309720150016 2020-08-08 19:51:10 -0700 <DeFiDaJo> @QWQiao Negative issuance w/ eip-1559 & 2.0? | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1292296820610211841 2020-08-08 20:09:06 -0700 <digi_banc> @yunuska06294485 @kevinsekniqi @SoundBenefit Within 1 year ETH2 and EIP 1559 and zk rollups. Within 3 years Sharding. There you go | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1292302962233159686 2020-08-08 20:33:30 -0700 <Robacoin> @eip1559 @IvanOnTech I watch this show daily. The most important thing about it, it is not about crypto or crazy altcoin gains, I watch for motivation to build my own platform, grow my business. | 0 replies 1 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1292303681929478145 2020-08-08 20:36:22 -0700 <DeFiGod1> @QWQiao Short sighted to actually believe ETH won’t have a supply cap and be a true deflationary coin with negative inflation rate or very close to it. EIP 1559, PoS. It’ll be actually deflationary instead of dis-inflationary. | 2 replies 1 retweets 10 likes | |
| 1292328584439242760 2020-08-08 22:15:19 -0700 <Tetranode> @QWQiao Let them debate about how the beans are counted while DeFi, staking, and EIP-1559 cause #Ethereum $ETH to go vertical. We have no time to split hairs... if they don't get it, we don't have time for them... too busy building sorry | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1292331450054975488 2020-08-08 22:26:42 -0700 <flovanlieshout> @APompliano As you know or should know by now, Ethereum will *likely have negative (~0,6%) inflation after EIP1559 gets implemented in the Berlin fork. At that point Ethereum will have more sustainable economics than Bitcoin. | 0 replies 2 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1292352115185274880 2020-08-08 23:48:49 -0700 <nanexcool> @eip1559 @aantonop Unused gas is always refunded. If you send 300,000 gas for a tx that ends up costing 100,000 you'll get 200,000 back. https://t.co/eGeNNJTH8r | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1292355505856434177 2020-08-09 00:02:18 -0700 <johnmorganFL> Vitalik Buterin highlights the importance of EIP-1559 to #Ethereum’s supply https://t.co/9ydvLMS0Gn | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1292356034137337857 2020-08-09 00:04:24 -0700 <Fiskantes> @QWQiao I think we should care less about what the herd thinks really. Esp. with EIP1559 when value from fees will accrue to ETH. | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1292356194867335168 2020-08-09 00:05:02 -0700 <CryptoSlate> Vitalik Buterin highlights the importance of EIP-1559 to Ethereum's supply (via @n1ckchong) Insight via @VitalikButerin https://t.co/Ti5yS2eWfD | 0 replies 3 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1292356465722667009 2020-08-09 00:06:06 -0700 <HodlersDigest> Vitalik Buterin highlights the importance of EIP-1559 to Ethereum’s supply - https://t.co/ljFXZT9rUW #Crypto #CryptoNews $BTC #ETH #Bitcoin | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1292356826785181698 2020-08-09 00:07:32 -0700 <DevereWealth> Vitalik Buterin highlights the importance of EIP-1559 to Ethereum’s supply https://t.co/uN4RIAf0ra #Analysis #People https://t.co/RN9sB5hMXD | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1292358034547769345 2020-08-09 00:12:20 -0700 <flovanlieshout> @narek_gevorgyan @BTC_JackSparrow Come EIP1559 it actually has a decreasing supply. Get your facts straight. | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1292358595208712192 2020-08-09 00:14:34 -0700 <webnowcompany> There&#8217;s been much controversy over recent days over Ethereum&#8217;s supply. The post Vitalik Buterin highlights the importance of EIP-1559 to Ethere...Read more: https://t.co/tpVtaDXpUy | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1292360759826153472 2020-08-09 00:23:10 -0700 <cryptow1re> reddit 🤖: Vitalik Buterin highlights the importance of EIP-1559 to Ethereum’s supply https://t.co/sq2MxHuDeI | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1292361013657063424 2020-08-09 00:24:11 -0700 <cryptow1re> #ethtrader 🤖: Vitalik Buterin highlights the importance of EIP-1559 to Ethereum’s supply https://t.co/0QgshpdzLi | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1292361407640543233 2020-08-09 00:25:45 -0700 <PaulESamson> Vitalik Buterin highlights the importance of EIP-1559 to Ethereum’s supply - #Analysis #ETHUSD #People #Technology - https://t.co/4cK1HKv1bh https://t.co/B2ayGPyYOO | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1292362473580965888 2020-08-09 00:29:59 -0700 <defivc> Vitalik Buterin highlights the importance of EIP-1559 to Ethereum’s supply https://t.co/Vlk7fr5o19 #ethereum | 0 replies 1 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1292364077096996866 2020-08-09 00:36:21 -0700 <SchalkDormehl> @APompliano @TripMariana Ethereum will likely have a negative inflation after EIP1559 is implemented. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1292368793726070784 2020-08-09 00:55:06 -0700 <whalehitman> @QWQiao simply ETH is an infinite supply currency with 4% inflation. With the upcoming improvements it can be reduced to 0 (EIP1559 and POS) -Bitcoin's '21 million supply' is just a meme and not sustainable. Mining bitcoin is becoming more centralized each day | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1292369651784192001 2020-08-09 00:58:30 -0700 <myfxinfocom> Vitalik Buterin highlights the importance of EIP-1559 to Ethereum’s supply https://t.co/NzO9L6R7tA | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1292369761146474497 2020-08-09 00:58:56 -0700 <myfxinfocom> Vitalik Buterin highlights the importance of EIP-1559 to Ethereum’s supply https://t.co/NzO9L6R7tA | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1292376619542355969 2020-08-09 01:26:11 -0700 <thecryptorep> (Vitalik Buterin highlights the importance of EIP-1559 to Ethereum’s supply) https://t.co/d8BbeVZsRl https://t.co/xy33vZCoyZ | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1292382667879649281 2020-08-09 01:50:13 -0700 <DlyCoin> Vitalik Buterin highlights the importance of EIP-1559 to Ethereum’s supply https://t.co/iHwBsaGOmS | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1292385045265743872 2020-08-09 01:59:40 -0700 <paoloardoino> @eip1559 As an exchange or as a person? I think we all have to give some priority support for the coin that made all this possible. And the innovation continues both on L1 and L2. Everyone is entitled to like whatever they want, full freedom, but respecting #bitcoin should be an axiom | 3 replies 3 retweets 33 likes | |
| 1292385131529768967 2020-08-09 02:00:01 -0700 <CryptoNetDaily> Vitalik Buterin highlights the importance of EIP-1559 to #Ethereum’s supply https://t.co/kkOkRdEzsR | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1292385553921474560 2020-08-09 02:01:42 -0700 <CriptoPasion> Vitalik Buterin destaca la importancia de EIP-1559 para el suministro de Ethereum - https://t.co/z9cvIZSdWu #cryptocurrencies #criptomonedas #bitcoin #btc https://t.co/YyB76gYBZE | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1292389757951959040 2020-08-09 02:18:24 -0700 <_MartinTan> @paoloardoino @eip1559 Not just respecting coin but also people who resisted ICO gluttony and stayed to work exclusively on Bitcoin. They are my heros. | 0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1292393868978278401 2020-08-09 02:34:44 -0700 <HodlingBitcoin> Vitalik Buterin highlights the importance of EIP-1559 to Ethereum’s supply https://t.co/jRnPvrWsRn | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1292394448396021760 2020-08-09 02:37:02 -0700 <roccodallas> The Status of EIP-1559 to Ethereum’s supply, Emphasised by Vitalik Buterin https://t.co/VYhc3wqynK #CBuzz #Bitcoin #Cryptocurrency #Ethereum | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1292395583697641473 2020-08-09 02:41:33 -0700 <CryptoGlazed> Vitalik Buterin highlights the importance of EIP-1559 to Ethereum’s supply https://t.co/qtr7GXoEwG #Analysis #People #Technology https://t.co/bxmItnMxt0 | 0 replies 1 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1292398811751514112 2020-08-09 02:54:22 -0700 <paoloardoino> @eip1559 Then ⤴️ I care about #Bitcoin and I ensure Finex has enough resources to experiment and support it long term. We work on many other integrations but we do reserve resources for BTC and L2 on BTC | 0 replies 0 retweets 7 likes | |
| 1292403384721367040 2020-08-09 03:12:33 -0700 <rhbtoday> #Technology #Analysis #ETHUSD #People Vitalik Buterin highlights the importance of EIP-1559 to Ethereum’s supply https://t.co/J6SW3vtNnU https://t.co/740FZ3Hmfm | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1292403568880824320 2020-08-09 03:13:17 -0700 <BitBoxNews> The Status of EIP-1559 to Ethereum’s supply, Emphasised by Vitalik Buterin https://t.co/ssCKrWNbzx | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1292405104541413376 2020-08-09 03:19:23 -0700 <BeCrusaders> The Status of EIP-1559 to Ethereum’s supply, Emphasised by Vitalik Buterin https://t.co/PUwyCMKng3 | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1292409060457771010 2020-08-09 03:35:06 -0700 <sumiya_cle> @eip1559 @IvanOnTech lols | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1292410574786244609 2020-08-09 03:41:07 -0700 <RssBit> #Crypto #News: "The Status of EIP-1559 to Ethereum’s supply, Emphasised by Vitalik Buterin" https://t.co/4aN6fxjlMl | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1292411894477856768 2020-08-09 03:46:22 -0700 <bitcns> The Status of EIP-1559 to Ethereum’s supply, Emphasised by Vitalik Buterin https://t.co/zcO1INcKXd | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1292420101807931398 2020-08-09 04:18:58 -0700 <btcnewsapp> Vitalik Buterin highlights the importance of EIP-1559 to Ethereum’s supply - CryptoSlate via BTCnews for iOS https://t.co/SMqEHAigy1 | 0 replies 1 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1292426878549143552 2020-08-09 04:45:54 -0700 <cryptow1re> #ethtrader 🤖: Consensys-backed Filecoin will test EIP-1559 (Fee burn) https://t.co/o0JdZOgil3 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1292427008438304768 2020-08-09 04:46:25 -0700 <cryptow1re> reddit 🤖: Consensys-backed Filecoin will test EIP-1559 (Fee burn) https://t.co/MOpm9xzb3I | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1292430410920730624 2020-08-09 04:59:56 -0700 <defivc> Consensys-backed Filecoin will test EIP-1559 (Fee burn) https://t.co/KwngYlmjws #ethereum | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1292436526366851073 2020-08-09 05:24:14 -0700 <AlgorithmicBot> In EIP-1559 we have the GAS_PREMIUM field. The current issue is that no one knows what the gas price should be, and so we see very high gas prices. Wouldn’t GAS_PREMIUM lead to a similar problem? #Ethereum #ethereummining | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1292437020900560896 2020-08-09 05:26:12 -0700 <PumpMoonshot> Vitalik Buterin highlights the importance of EIP-1559 to Ethereum’s supply - https://t.co/6IYHDpY5Ry There’s been much controversy over recent days over Ethereum’s supply. As report... | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1292438720952578049 2020-08-09 05:32:58 -0700 <GODofETH> Vitalik Buterin highlights the importance of EIP-1559 to #Ethereum’s supply: https://t.co/1pBa4qJM2I | 0 replies 0 retweets 6 likes | |
| 1292462638954422277 2020-08-09 07:08:00 -0700 <EthereumNetw> Vitalik Buterin highlights the importance of EIP-1559 to #Ethereum's supply @vitalikbuterin https://t.co/0Jiy6sSx7i | 1 replies 9 retweets 31 likes | |
| 1292488389825040391 2020-08-09 08:50:20 -0700 <ICO_News_Blog> Vitalik Buterin unterstreicht die Bedeutung des EIP-1559 für Ethereum https://t.co/3oMBkg0UHp | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1292488405528477697 2020-08-09 08:50:23 -0700 <coincornernews> Vitalik Buterin unterstreicht die Bedeutung des EIP-1559 für Ethereum https://t.co/Hr6TDozKbw | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1292488690954940416 2020-08-09 08:51:31 -0700 <Crypto49ers> Vitalik Buterin unterstreicht die Bedeutung des EIP-1559 für Ethereum https://t.co/mobsm1hytN | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1292489263259381761 2020-08-09 08:53:48 -0700 <nathandoctor> @QWQiao If we see EIP1559 ETH has killer monetary policy - profitability. In the meantime being the base layer for DeFi is a strong narrative for the herd. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1292492717906247680 2020-08-09 09:07:31 -0700 <rajeshns87> @VitalikButerin Don't you think it's HIGH TIME to deploy layer 2+ EIP-1559 ??? https://t.co/tL7pabuEu6 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1292494770774798337 2020-08-09 09:15:41 -0700 <rajeshns87> @TrustlessState It's high time to execute EIP-1559 and/or layer 2 solns, isn't it? https://t.co/BCCqhCLHiK | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1292502840460611584 2020-08-09 09:47:45 -0700 <Crypto_n_derivs> https://t.co/IebRYwUavx allows me to see how inefficient ETH fee market is We really need EIP 1559 or equivalent.... | 1 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1292507201530023937 2020-08-09 10:05:05 -0700 <alexgausman> @musatheredguard Some ppl give me shit for using P/E (mcap/fees) as a blockchain metric. But with eip-1559 and PoS I think it is quite relevant. ETH's P/E is sub 100 now, which is pretty insane considering all the upside. Hands down best risk/reward in crypto imo https://t.co/mbGUrmazoy | 2 replies 1 retweets 13 likes | |
| 1292514069870776320 2020-08-09 10:32:22 -0700 <PumpMoonshot> Ethereum News Today – Headlines for August 9 - https://t.co/pNFOXRv2QD Ethereum’s founder highlights why EIP-1559 is crucial to the network’s supplyThe network’s current transaction model is inadequateThe Ethere... | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1292526513435410433 2020-08-09 11:21:49 -0700 <CryptoCryptoNe3> The EIP-1559 Is Extremely Important To Ethereum’s Supply: Buterin CRYPTO CRYPTO NEWS - https://t.co/ltTk9f7dk3 https://t.co/b47xUXnM0f | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1292530248366530560 2020-08-09 11:36:39 -0700 <Tudor_Holotescu> The world is anxiously watching! #flippening2020 #eip1559 #eth #btc https://t.co/2RbZOyOh63 | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1292547829261651968 2020-08-09 12:46:31 -0700 <dankrad> @ralexstokes Isn't that kind of blocked on EIP1559 implementation? | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1292552597203812353 2020-08-09 13:05:28 -0700 <watatata0108> Recently, about 13,000ETH are minted as block reward and about 5~7,000ETH are paid as tx fee for miners per day respectively. Based on this premise, if EIP-1559 was implemented the daily increase rate of ETH supply might go down roughly 50~75%. ETH would be less inflationary. | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1292570959245987841 2020-08-09 14:18:26 -0700 <PhABCD> Some more puzzling pieces for me: - ETH has EIP-1559 coming - ETH staking is much better defined and developed than LINK staking - I believe Chainlink fees will be subsidized by Chainlink team, reducing the demand for LINKs | 2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1292591262495838209 2020-08-09 15:39:06 -0700 <BTC_JackSparrow> If you are not buying the asset that powers the Uniswap craze, then what are you doing, especially considering EIP 1559? It’s like not being long on pickaxe companies during the gold rush | 19 replies 20 retweets 227 likes | |
| 1292612637730242560 2020-08-09 17:04:03 -0700 <CryptoCryptoNe3> The EIP-1559 Is Extremely Important To Ethereum’s Supply: Buterin CRYPTO CRYPTO NEWS - https://t.co/NJkSEZTCLm https://t.co/ospot4QxTX | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1292629217776214018 2020-08-09 18:09:56 -0700 <Ethprofit> I wanted to bring attention to EIP-1559 (Ethereum Improvement Proposals), as it opens Pandora's box for #Ethereum. Burning much of the #ETH in the transaction fee would greatly reduce inflation. Incentivizing network usage and hodlers. As the value of $ETH would be higher.🚀 | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1292629548018917377 2020-08-09 18:11:14 -0700 <Ethprofit> Here is a great article from @TrustlessState about EIP-1559 (Ethereum Improvement Proposals) https://t.co/zE0RwsCFYN | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1292663407963971585 2020-08-09 20:25:47 -0700 <GeistLight> @RubinhoISR @pierre_rochard @weaker I believe the current plan is to create value for eth by making it a utility token which must be used to pay fees. look up EIP 1559 for more info. https://t.co/RlFLTvA9dY | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1292682090450833408 2020-08-09 21:40:01 -0700 <Antmantime> @eip1559 @IvanOnTech If Ivan stood up you'd see that he is actually wearing tight little boy panties | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1292694576088715266 2020-08-09 22:29:38 -0700 <andrewriley777> @ernyx8 @VitalikButerin According to eip 1559 the transaction fees that are bid for each transaction get burned(destroyed) so Vitalik is saying here that more eth would be destroyed right now than would be created through block rewards. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1292718354302734336 2020-08-10 00:04:07 -0700 <ChainNewscom> 【Filecoin 将在下次测试网重置中实现 EIP1559，试图改进拍卖效率】链闻消息，分布式存储项目 Filecoin 的研发工程师 Jeromy Johnson 在推特上表示，Filecoin 的下一次测试网重置后将会…… https://t.co/SF6ZpmH2cH | 0 replies 1 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1292755781704704010 2020-08-10 02:32:51 -0700 <das_grasshopper> Wow FileCoin va a implementar el EIP1559, eso significa que contarán con un mecanismo de inflación negativa al quemar 🔥 cierta cantidad del Network token por cada transacción. Es como si fuera un recurso no-renovable con una emisión mucho muy controlada. Wow! @juanbenet | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1292763113163563009 2020-08-10 03:01:59 -0700 <dianduidian> 【点对点快讯】Filecoin将在下次测试网重置中实现EIP1559，试图改进拍卖效率 https://t.co/jDMNDQEZI4 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1292787998627516418 2020-08-10 04:40:52 -0700 <thegezman> @ljxie Most Ethereans could care less about the hard money thing. They are too busy making their Bitcoin generate some yield. The funny thing is ETH will likely reach a SoV acceptance faster that bitcoin if 2.0 staking and EIP 1559 go live. No guarantee with that happening though. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1292822037501796353 2020-08-10 06:56:07 -0700 <nethermindeth> Lots of exciting discussions already taking place at #EDCON2020! It's not too late to tune in 😉 @tkstanczak's talk on the highly anticipated EIP-1559 is happening today at 2:10PM EDT. Which other talks are you looking forward to catching? | 1 replies 11 retweets 41 likes | |
| 1292836571658346497 2020-08-10 07:53:53 -0700 <DeFi_Dad> @eip1559 🥳 But I’m pretty sure Chris has talked about insurance previously. If you read his book Cryptoassets it tells a nice history of of Bitcoin and Ethereum and once you know the history of the DAO Hack, you know firsthand how powerful #DeFi insurance for smart contract bugs is. | 1 replies 1 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1292840189774245888 2020-08-10 08:08:15 -0700 <KickEcosystem> The uncapped supply of #ether has become a point of contention for #Ethereum critics in recent days — one EIP-1559 could fix. How important are future controls over the $ETH supply, in your opinion? Let us know in the comments! #Crypto #markets https://t.co/BAHgcXsALY | 1 replies 1 retweets 38 likes | |
| 1292876066151739395 2020-08-10 10:30:49 -0700 <vjsingh102> @boxmining @ethereum @VitalikButerin No, it isn't. The "new supply" issuance remains the same. It will become deflationary (or at least less inflationary) after #EIP1559 when these gas fees start getting burned. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1292907772921565184 2020-08-10 12:36:48 -0700 <owocki> So... uh, when is EIP 1559 going into a fork? | 4 replies 5 retweets 45 likes | |
| 1292916433496625153 2020-08-10 13:11:13 -0700 <willmorriss4> @kacperwikiel @AFDudley0 EIP 1559 does not fix gas prices. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1292917142564876289 2020-08-10 13:14:02 -0700 <ioTalent_> @DCdoso @emurgo_io @eip1559 | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1292917152027217924 2020-08-10 13:14:04 -0700 <EDCON_Official> Up Next: @tkstanczak from @nethermindeth will be talking about “#Ethereum Gas Price Markets with EIP-1559” Watch now: https://t.co/IhyEyxY8L9 #EDCON2020 | 0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1292918649854889985 2020-08-10 13:20:02 -0700 <TrustlessState> A single application on #Ethereum is generating as much fees as the entire #bitcoin blockchain. That’s just ONE app What happens when: - there’s 10 of them? - transaction fees are burnt in EIP1559? - sharding enables 100x more capacity? $ETH at $400 is hilarious | 16 replies 46 retweets 253 likes | |
| 1292919148478160900 2020-08-10 13:22:00 -0700 <coinbureau> There is no doubt that next to ETH 2.0, EIP 1559 is one of the most exciting updates on the Ethereum blockchain. It will provide a much needed improvement in user experience, gas management. Needed now more than ever. https://t.co/Dktms2Xjro #Ethereum $ETH #crypto | 1 replies 1 retweets 14 likes | |
| 1292922728513769474 2020-08-10 13:36:14 -0700 <CryptoCryptoNe3> The EIP-1559 Is Extremely Important To Ethereum’s Supply: Buterin CRYPTO CRYPTO NEWS - https://t.co/U0mk04nYPD https://t.co/mdlEG6HvzX | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1292925551154470918 2020-08-10 13:47:27 -0700 <Teutonium> @JordanMWilhite @ZiggyMurphy69 @davidgokhshtein @sunshinelu24 More true than you might realize... ETH 2.0 is a change to PoS and shards, VeChain already has PoA which is even better at reaching consensus (got to check regarding the shards), Eth is also going to have EIP1559 which is fee burning, vechain has this since the beginning! | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1292927994533679107 2020-08-10 13:57:09 -0700 <PaoloRebuffo> Nice Video On EIP 1559 Status https://t.co/ffxs3cfmg2 | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1292936924437463040 2020-08-10 14:32:39 -0700 <tayvano_> @eip1559 @ercwl Honestly if I got that text id be like "do your thing, boy." Your tweet that gets 10k-100k impressions or @ channel shilling is not a convo with your buddy from high school. 1) they're asking 2) 1-on-1 is not 1-to-many 3) they can beat you up at your high school reunion 😂 | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1292938993714245632 2020-08-10 14:40:52 -0700 <josephjpeters> @Dogetoshi And ETH would be majorly deflationary with EIP1559 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1292949522885128192 2020-08-10 15:22:42 -0700 <jimmyjames198> @MsHodl @udiWertheimer The scarcity argument is brought up by proponents of EIP1559 and PoS who believe fee burn and smaller security costs would mean the issuance would be lower and make ETH scarce. But that’s dependent on a ton of other variables, unlike bitcoin where the chain revolves around 21M. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1292953741394677763 2020-08-10 15:39:28 -0700 <RyanBerckmans> @MorganTBennett @josephjpeters @owocki In my mind, we should focus our risk budget on the transition to EIP-1559, eth2, and growing layer2s, and try to avoid changing the proof of work rewards schedule. | 1 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1292961359827738624 2020-08-10 16:09:44 -0700 <RyanBerckmans> @cyber_hokie @alexgausman Changing the proof of work rewards schedule is extremely risky from a community point of view. I think we should spend our risk budget on the transition to eth2, EIP-1559, and layer2s, and try not to change proof of work. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1292967967206985728 2020-08-10 16:36:00 -0700 <cc_ninjaboys> FilecoinにEIP-1559の仕様を乗せてリリースするって本当なのか？ ただでさえローンチ伸びてるのに… | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1292980311542947842 2020-08-10 17:25:03 -0700 <AdelElmessiry> @VitalikButerin Totally, no one explains it like @aantonop ! What do you think of EIP1559 creating artificial equilibrium? | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1292988504507420672 2020-08-10 17:57:36 -0700 <tarangkhaitan> @VitalikButerin EIP-1559 cant come soon enough. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1292988707159515137 2020-08-10 17:58:25 -0700 <EthVegan> @eip1559 Thought the whole point was flipping off the “current financial world” not flippening it onto the blockchain (with the regulatory capture that INEVITABLY entails) — ??????? https://t.co/tqGV9nfRK8 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1292993108834045955 2020-08-10 18:15:54 -0700 <Perseverance311> [Vitalik Buterin: Sound Money Religion Cannot Happen Until ETH2, EIP 1559 Implemented] Vitalik Bute... https://t.co/LSmbuY7FSM https://t.co/eMFvFtcs8M | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1293021632684941312 2020-08-10 20:09:15 -0700 <iwearahoodie> @genesis_report I'm sure most of the defi noise is just mania right now, but there's actual real useful projects being built in amongst the hype. And EIP1559... there's a chance the monetary policy becomes even harder than Bitcoin's. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1293042049311072256 2020-08-10 21:30:22 -0700 <Mp24Rossi> @eip1559 @IvanOnTech Ivan is soo funny. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1293060024181223426 2020-08-10 22:41:48 -0700 <CB_Nielsen> @Breedlove22 @VitalikButerin EIP-1559 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1293060641465409537 2020-08-10 22:44:15 -0700 <ChihChengLiang> How would you name the mechanism described in EIP-1559? | 4 replies 1 retweets 8 likes | |
| 1293079888858165250 2020-08-11 00:00:44 -0700 <toptickcrypto> EIP 1559 is pretty cool! | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1293101110035509248 2020-08-11 01:25:03 -0700 <Extr0pia> @Ziya_Sadr @ponisha sure ... right now most fees might burn due to gas price. but habibi... eip1559... habibi progress... SHOW ME THE PROGRESS IN BTC in the last 2 years.... i show you some upcoming projects... also that Uniswap ..is ONE SINGLE application on ethereum netwrok. imagine 2 more... | 3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1293149981088653312 2020-08-11 04:39:15 -0700 <josephjpeters> @RickZabel_WNY Might want to read up on EIP1559. Though it’s primarily a fee market optimization it also has a side effect where it puts pressure on annual inflation. https://t.co/yKmupRAzNc | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1293152366175412225 2020-08-11 04:48:44 -0700 <josephjpeters> @IwanRabbinstein @tweet_stamp This also doesn’t include the impact of EIP1559 which will be part of ETH2 and likely added to ETH1. https://t.co/yKmupRAzNc | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1293169606501244928 2020-08-11 05:57:14 -0700 <flash_espanol> EIP-1559 podría hacer que Ethereum sea deflacionario - discusión sobre suministro se dispara #bitcoin #btc #eth #ethereum https://t.co/5BJA1Tpfou | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1293177171373162497 2020-08-11 06:27:18 -0700 <CryptoNewsFlas3> EIP-1559 could make Ethereum deflationary - supply discussion flares up #bitcoin #btc #eth #ethereum https://t.co/7eyaTnVogI | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1293178848196956166 2020-08-11 06:33:58 -0700 <flovanlieshout> @AlbaniaEos @zackvoell @ethereum BTC, halving until zero inflation, fees will have to cover mining costs. ETH EIP1559 burning BASEFEE negative inflation, blockreward + tips will have to cover validator costs. EOS inflation and no burn = subsidy forever. | 0 replies 0 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1293181166296502272 2020-08-11 06:43:10 -0700 <FlashDeutsch> Ethereum durch EIP-1559 deflationär? Supply-Diskussion flammt auf #bitcoin #btc #eth #ethereum https://t.co/8h26bch6tV | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1293183604214788101 2020-08-11 06:52:52 -0700 <NewsFrancais> EIP-1559 pourrait rendre Ethereum déflationniste - Discussion sur l'offre s'emballe #bitcoin #btc #eth #ethereum https://t.co/63z76YFpm1 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1293187965791830016 2020-08-11 07:10:11 -0700 <cryptos4ever> EIP-1559 could make Ethereum deflationary - supply discussion flares up #crypto #blockchain #altcoins #ethereum #eth https://t.co/qqzzZfM5NJ | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1293202967747874816 2020-08-11 08:09:48 -0700 <TrustlessState> - EIP1559 estimated Q1/Q2 of 2021 All these massive fees that Ethereum has been generating? Those get BURNT They don't get recirculated back into the ecosystem. Instead, EIP1559 issues a universal dividend by burning ETH, which adds to ETH scarcity and Ethereum security | 2 replies 4 retweets 17 likes | |
| 1293208986863378432 2020-08-11 08:33:43 -0700 <ArmandoKuroda> Virgencita plis que ya se implemente la EIP-1559. https://t.co/nBfWTYPKCD #Ethereum | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1293213112821149696 2020-08-11 08:50:07 -0700 <mrjasonchoi> @JonathanErlichL EIP1559 will make this thesis stronger, but technically ETH 2.0 does too (more reason to hold ETH longer than when needed for paying gas). | 0 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1293220898170961921 2020-08-11 09:21:03 -0700 <defitimes> @econoar It breaks my heart that EIP-1559 is not here yet.. | 1 replies 0 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1293221360445960192 2020-08-11 09:22:53 -0700 <tarangkhaitan> @econoar EIP-1559 cant come soon enough. | 0 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1293223027736342528 2020-08-11 09:29:31 -0700 <iwearahoodie> @econoar @antiprosynth What’s the timeline for implementing EIP1559? | 0 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1293223326635237382 2020-08-11 09:30:42 -0700 <lucadonnoh> @DeFiWorldHQ @econoar i heard @Filecoin uses an implementation of eip1559 | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1293223450199445507 2020-08-11 09:31:12 -0700 <Ethprofit> @econoar EIP-1559 SoonTM... Can't wait! #Ethereum #ETH $ETH | 0 replies 1 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1293229198291554304 2020-08-11 09:54:02 -0700 <safetyth1rd> @aliatiia_ i would choose the most technical one where you can provide the most unique insight. For instance, DeFi moats sounds like it might be non-technical, and others may be able to analyze it as well, but layer 2 race, or maybe eip1559 may be your unique strength. | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1293229281665888257 2020-08-11 09:54:22 -0700 <Gargant34260060> @sss4321_s @econoar Maybe the Eth heads who dong think eip 1559 matters because durr “Eth isn’t money” might finally realize that these things do matter just as much for them since now non financial apps plays second fiddle since have to pay for high value txs | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1293293484066078720 2020-08-11 14:09:29 -0700 <bneiluj> @eip1559 Getting stronger Is all about strengthening your weaknesses. https://t.co/Bue9rQ2hs9 | 1 replies 1 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1293298726753230849 2020-08-11 14:30:19 -0700 <yodaism> @eip1559 Only teach, Yoda can, those who are willing to learn. Follow Yoda, you must. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1293322499355074560 2020-08-11 16:04:47 -0700 <Mez_lol> @VitalikButerin @nethermindeth You proposed a limited supply for ETH to maintain its value, now we have eth 2.0, staking etc. But eth supply still rises? Don't need inflation if we have such a high degree of divisibility. Issuance of new ETH is higher than the inflation rate of the dollar. EIP 1559 seems good. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1293340087921582080 2020-08-11 17:14:40 -0700 <evan_van_ness> #MuchClicked * @dannyryan eth2 quick update * @VitalikButerin eth2 annotated spec * @JonnyRhea crawling Medalla stats * @darkforest_eth real time strategy game with SNARKs * @trailofbits bug found in @iearnfinance by @samczsun * @Whyrusleeping EIP1559 in latest @Filecoin testnet | 0 replies 10 retweets 62 likes | |
| 1293354022020296704 2020-08-11 18:10:02 -0700 <NewsCryptoBot> Vitalik Buterin highlights the importance of EIP-1559 to Ethereum’s supply https://t.co/EzuGA2bcTG | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1293370011537432576 2020-08-11 19:13:35 -0700 <theallinpod> @eip1559 https://t.co/kK0dotm82a | 1 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1293371450649464832 2020-08-11 19:19:18 -0700 <DaxTaran> @IvanovKLC We desperately need EIP-1559 and a fee escalator... | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1293377234066014208 2020-08-11 19:42:17 -0700 <danielpsegundo> @MapleLeafCap @gggonecrypto What do you think the practical odds of EIP-1559 being implemented are? People in the Ethereum community have been talking about this for a long time. Thank you. | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1293425204002136065 2020-08-11 22:52:53 -0700 <iwearahoodie> @CiscoisGold Your thoughts on EIP 1559 though? | 2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1293434151471919104 2020-08-11 23:28:27 -0700 <CHalexov2016> + #ethereum eip 1559 proposal will be a gas burn so for eth its will mean maxx approx 0.5% a year supply rise maxx 👌 this is real important! | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1293439691723812865 2020-08-11 23:50:28 -0700 <AlexMittermeier> #Ethereum kletterte zuletzt auf ca. 400 US-$ (+200% in 2020). Nicht nur der #DeFi Boom, sondern auch das kommende Upgrade auf Eth 2.0 sorgen für Optimismus. Mit dem EIP 1559 gibt es einen wichtigen Verbesserungsvorschlag, der #ETH voranbringen könnte https://t.co/EH2Jo5crKK | 1 replies 2 retweets 26 likes | |
| 1293440483222409216 2020-08-11 23:53:36 -0700 <iwearahoodie> @CiscoisGold Nah not that one. But the burning of gas fees on EIP1559 over a certain amount potentially creating deflation (reducing supply of coins). Would that make it even harder money that zec or BTC? And in a year or two, not 140 years? | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1293441039584366593 2020-08-11 23:55:49 -0700 <cryptow1re> reddit 🤖: EIP-1559 could make Ethereum deflationary - supply discussion flares up https://t.co/mAdNAQD5ib | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1293441353683210241 2020-08-11 23:57:04 -0700 <cryptow1re> #ethtrader 🤖: EIP-1559 could make Ethereum deflationary - supply discussion flares up https://t.co/VJxCJcVHm2 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1293466171933687809 2020-08-12 01:35:41 -0700 <GregJeanmart> 2/ EIP-1559 but still at the research stage and requires a lot of coordinations between all the actors (nodes, wallets) of the ecosystem | 1 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1293472838414991361 2020-08-12 02:02:10 -0700 <DastardlyDaniel> @BandSpy01 Between this man, EIP-1559 & $AVAX, the future is looking bright | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1293474332098863105 2020-08-12 02:08:07 -0700 <damivazbien> I love the innovation on Ethereum, the architecture of ETH2, L2, and EIP-1559 also, the possibility of reward community on each transaction https://t.co/AkKJvreQfo | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1293477735134908416 2020-08-12 02:21:38 -0700 <GuntisVitolins> Is this new @Ethereum gas standard @VitalikButerin . Transaction fees exceeding block rewards. When EIP 1559? https://t.co/ipBQTl934u | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1293501677123907586 2020-08-12 03:56:46 -0700 <EthLaboratory> @SwipeWallet eating: 💳Cryptocom (Cards) 👛Coinbase (SwipeWallet) 💰Compound (SwipeFi and Governance) 🦄Uniswap (SwipeSwap) 🏦Banking (SwipePay, SwipeCredit, SwipeSavings) $sxp supply is emitted and burned via fees until 100m capped. Think EIP1559 but on the app layer 🤯🤯🤯 https://t.co/X6w2qBrsbK | 4 replies 6 retweets 18 likes | |
| 1293504580475588610 2020-08-12 04:08:18 -0700 <Marian0V> @santisiri Puts some candles on EIP1559? 189Gwei atm Y_Y https://t.co/anmrTLVr3W https://t.co/xcs96Lmtyd | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1293505635615531009 2020-08-12 04:12:30 -0700 <shingen_crypto> その後ADSLで定額制が実現したんですが、これって順番で見ると強烈な需要があるから供給が出てくるって事なのではないかと。 つまり今回のガス代高騰が続く状況こそがL2実用化の引き金になると思ってます。今までは”そのうち必要だよね”位だったのが切羽詰まる訳です。 更にEIP1559系の案も進みそう | 1 replies 0 retweets 15 likes | |
| 1293507143430213632 2020-08-12 04:18:29 -0700 <MaurathMike> EIP-1559 could make Ethereum deflationary – supply discussion flares up https://t.co/zJkQ4urrT6 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1293529918270320645 2020-08-12 05:48:59 -0700 <dka218> If a great enough portion* of the supply supports EIP 1559, the net inflation rate* will be reduced, which may boost the price, causing the marketcap* to rise, even before the PoS* transition. *all of these require knowing the supply #SupplyGate | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1293539641262579713 2020-08-12 06:27:37 -0700 <JoeBGrech> @LayahHeilpern become a validator node in the network. Sharding will increase the transaction throughput of the Ethereum network dramatically. Also, we can see the introduction of EIP-1559, which will combat Etheruems inflationary supply, thus keeping supply stable. | 2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1293546505928945664 2020-08-12 06:54:54 -0700 <SCBuergel> How long would it take EIP1559 to burn this many ETH? Let's remember this narrative when this DeFi recklessness blows up: reduced circulating supply is good for (almost) all of us! | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1293551336395399168 2020-08-12 07:14:06 -0700 <SkyHODL> @kurtwuckertjr Imagine when ETH 2.0 launches the EIP1559. Those $3.7 million fees from transactions will be burnt. Decreasing the ETH supply. Per day. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1293575897518419971 2020-08-12 08:51:42 -0700 <BFreshHB> Ya boy just made a vid on EIP-1559, and the potential burning of ETH, let me know what ya think! $ETH #Ethereum https://t.co/KiUz7uzV0y | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1293586525079375873 2020-08-12 09:33:55 -0700 <cryptow1re> reddit 🤖: I just made a video on EIP-1559, Id love your feedback on it since I'm just getting started on YouTube! All... https://t.co/CPqkZwd6Ai | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1293587385566089216 2020-08-12 09:37:21 -0700 <veliko_test3> I just made a video on EIP-1559, Id love your feedback on it since I'm just getting started on YouTube! All criticism is welcome 😁 https://t.co/PfceACu5Mr | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1293608017263382528 2020-08-12 10:59:20 -0700 <santiagoroel> Gas prices where they are, if EIP-1559 gets introduced then $ETH may be the most undervalued on a P/E basis. | 0 replies 1 retweets 10 likes | |
| 1293608857059524608 2020-08-12 11:02:40 -0700 <DavidSteinrueck> EIP-1559 🙏 | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1293613698959933440 2020-08-12 11:21:54 -0700 <CrypDork> Alright #Ethereum dev community. EIP-1559 implementation needed stat. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1293613761434189825 2020-08-12 11:22:09 -0700 <Ethprofit> Can't wait for #Ethereum 2.0 & EIP-1559 (Ethereum Improvement Proposal) $ETH #ETH #Ethprofit #Bitcoin #BTC https://t.co/wOPn3sXbSk | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1293616396929241089 2020-08-12 11:32:37 -0700 <vodietsche> Where can I go margin long on the #Ethereum gas price? Asking for a friend. #EIP1559 can't come soon enough... Seems to be #DeFi projects that are causing this. Demand is definitely there! Meanwhile #ETH miners are getting rich AF. :) https://t.co/vquszWZJVx | 1 replies 0 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1293627510291419136 2020-08-12 12:16:47 -0700 <ggmesh> Haha! Many commenters out there opportunistically promoting alternative platforms with lower fees (and 0 traffic) Let's see what #EIP1559 brings | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1293643155942891521 2020-08-12 13:18:57 -0700 <BobaBonanza> @MattDavidKaye all ethereum needs it eip 1559, this lets anyone get in a low fee transaction within a few days on the pullback of the blocksize | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1293643607346278401 2020-08-12 13:20:45 -0700 <tarangkhaitan> @PhABCD @DuneAnalytics That's nice. Sadly EIP-1559 is still pretty far away 😢 | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1293651745361469440 2020-08-12 13:53:05 -0700 <Dominator0081> @econoar Should cancel EIP-1559 and replace with inflation! | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1293655090310643712 2020-08-12 14:06:23 -0700 <papa_raw> Is anything being done to fast track EIP-1559? What can we do as a community to accelerate this important feature? | 0 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1293658812210085892 2020-08-12 14:21:10 -0700 <WolfHodl> @glassnodealerts @VitalikButerin implement that EIP1559 asap -_- I can't even do staking without paying 40 dollars fee | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1293661582640152577 2020-08-12 14:32:11 -0700 <FrenchQGeek> @eip1559 @YamFinance @VitalikButerin FIX THIS PLZ -- Mr. Coder https://t.co/XCp7dBNcSB | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1293664134236647424 2020-08-12 14:42:19 -0700 <FrenchQGeek> @eip1559 @YamFinance @VitalikButerin @loopringorg Thanks for educating, appreciate the info but why aren't people jumping onboard? | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1293665156979929093 2020-08-12 14:46:23 -0700 <FrenchQGeek> @eip1559 @YamFinance @VitalikButerin @loopringorg FYI, it's 29$ gas fee just to register on https://t.co/zCtRupgeDF right now. f*ck that | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1293666733077733376 2020-08-12 14:52:38 -0700 <FrenchQGeek> @eip1559 @YamFinance @VitalikButerin @loopringorg good thing I bought a few Radeon VII last winter at least I'm cashing in with this while all my funds are frozen.... | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1293667547808751616 2020-08-12 14:55:53 -0700 <FrenchQGeek> @eip1559 @YamFinance @VitalikButerin @loopringorg I just wanted in on YAM... will pass I guess | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1293667884733009921 2020-08-12 14:57:13 -0700 <r_Ethereum> I just made a video on EIP-1559, Id love your feedback on it since I'm just getting started on YouTube! All criticism is welcome 😁 #Ethereum https://t.co/P5ABsCG9he | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1293668415731896323 2020-08-12 14:59:20 -0700 <FrenchQGeek> @eip1559 @YamFinance @VitalikButerin @loopringorg 500m+ in 24h, its more than when YFI launched. Wouldn't call it nothing. | 1 replies 1 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1293680140296155136 2020-08-12 15:45:55 -0700 <tzhen> @aliatiia_ EIP 1559 Also if your DM is open, would like to chat. I think we are both working on the same general direction. | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1293680601464266754 2020-08-12 15:47:45 -0700 <the_ethernaut> 260 gas safe low 😬 It's all good 👍🔥 Does anyone know when eip-1559 going live? Waiting for eth 2 is just not gonna cut it. | 1 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1293680940892319744 2020-08-12 15:49:06 -0700 <pythianism> @aliatiia_ Man these are all really good EIP1559 and L2 are my votes | 0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1293683777223315457 2020-08-12 16:00:22 -0700 <stormpking> @dantwany @eip1559 Hahaha everyone just assumes 2000😂 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1293684529241247744 2020-08-12 16:03:21 -0700 <Phil_Baxter1> @eip1559 @stevenmarkryan Actually it’s 2103.45 before the split. That’s the smoke a bowl point. | 0 replies 0 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1293696787362979840 2020-08-12 16:52:04 -0700 <MassiveKaizen> @eip1559 And then he announces taking TSLA private 😂 | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1293696852110393344 2020-08-12 16:52:19 -0700 <owocki> @scupytrooples @TrustlessState I think EIP 1559 and L2 are our biggest hope short term. Long term sharding and POS will also provide relief | 0 replies 0 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1293762513595555842 2020-08-12 21:13:14 -0700 <iwearahoodie> Once maxies read about and learn the implication of eip 1559, I think there's going to be even more people taking a serious look at ethereum. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1293763263142993924 2020-08-12 21:16:13 -0700 <fubuloubu> @wekabot One of the few reasons I like EIP1559, I think having a static block reward (or at the very least, a reward that tends towards a particular static value given a certain level of security) using inflation to pay for security balances nicely with demand-driven deflation. | 1 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1293767391072190465 2020-08-12 21:32:37 -0700 <WolfHodl> @RyanSAdams Man when EIP 1559? the fees are crazy rn | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1293779536375451648 2020-08-12 22:20:53 -0700 <sassal0x> @wekabot This is a popular opinion! I wrote about it here in the context of EIP-1559 :) https://t.co/hyAvKogKiY | 0 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1293783298892795904 2020-08-12 22:35:50 -0700 <PaoloRebuffo> The 2020 great #ethereum gas crisis is still on the rise. The Cure are: Fast: second layer adoption #zkProof, #statechannel, #Plasma Short term: more efficient client(s) and more #gaslimit x block #geth #TurboGeth Medium term: #Eip1559 Long term: #eth2 phases 1,2 https://t.co/d2OVMJeMCR | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1293788416652517377 2020-08-12 22:56:10 -0700 <PhABCD> 📉 We are now almost at -7,000 ETH a day, if EIP-1559 was implemented. If this was an average, it would result in a yearly deflation of the ETH supply by about 2%. https://t.co/GG9tBTt9pe | 10 replies 48 retweets 169 likes | |
| 1293820418118365185 2020-08-13 01:03:20 -0700 <PeterKallos2017> @eip1559 @kerooke @barrysilbert @Sonnenshein @michael_saylor @Grayscale Publicly traded companies must provide proof. If they falsely claim to have purchased BTC but in fact didn't then they'd be prosecuted. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1293842277811605505 2020-08-13 02:30:12 -0700 <CryptoScrub23> @VitalikButerin when EIP1559. The gas fees are becoming ridiculous. $eth gas fees are now not only eating into profits but becoming equal to the profit itself. If buying and selling an erc20 token on uniswap is going to cost 60 dollars people will prefer cex over dex eventually. | 3 replies 1 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1293842991082360832 2020-08-13 02:33:02 -0700 <CryptoScrub23> @enjin @witekradomski @AlexSaundersAU was EIP1559 discussed? | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1293864350751612929 2020-08-13 03:57:54 -0700 <Fiskantes> @zhusu If this is not product market fit I dont know what is. EIP 1559 can't come fast enough | 0 replies 1 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1293869653337366535 2020-08-13 04:18:58 -0700 <Arthur_0x> EIP-1559 can't come soon enough. | 4 replies 22 retweets 199 likes | |
| 1293875030603051010 2020-08-13 04:40:20 -0700 <DaxTaran> @Arthur_0x inb4 the "EIP1559 doesn't help with reducing transaction fees" crowd | 1 replies 0 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1293876633141747712 2020-08-13 04:46:43 -0700 <patentlyGerman> @gakonst @jadler0 @arjunblj EIP 1559 ? | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1293888757238624259 2020-08-13 05:34:53 -0700 <wekawork2> EIP-1559 can't come soon enough | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1293901384144756739 2020-08-13 06:25:04 -0700 <dmihal> @paddypisa ...just dreaming of EIP-1559 https://t.co/TiPAgJf2Nn | 0 replies 0 retweets 11 likes | |
| 1293908721001619459 2020-08-13 06:54:13 -0700 <hasufl> @VitalikButerin @wekabot @jemenger That's why I think EIP-1559 is an elegant solution. 1) ETH holders pay for security via inflation 2) everyone (incl. token holders) pay ETH holders via ETH burn | 2 replies 4 retweets 35 likes | |
| 1293922002437206018 2020-08-13 07:46:59 -0700 <ioTalent_> @cryptorangutang @eip1559 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1293926224679407616 2020-08-13 08:03:46 -0700 <nethermindeth> Missed @tkstanczak's talk on EIP-1559 earlier this week at #EDCON2020? Not to worry - the recording is available on YouTube 🙌 Tomasz' talk starts @ 30:00, but the full video is worth a watch w/ talks from @ethereum, @prylabs + @identhree 🙃 #Ethereum https://t.co/8uODnCX0Am | 0 replies 4 retweets 9 likes | |
| 1293926291243229186 2020-08-13 08:04:02 -0700 <coinbureau> Yield Farming gas guzzling. Those sky high APYs come at a cost: The broader practicality of the Ethereum network. While everyone is focused on ETH 2.0, there also needs to be an emphasis on other scaling solutions. EIP 1559? Plasma / Raiden? #Ethereum #yieldfarming #gas $ETH https://t.co/CYBBvjZTq4 | 3 replies 1 retweets 11 likes | |
| 1293954659959349252 2020-08-13 09:56:46 -0700 <cryptocasca> #defi needs $eth to adopt eip-1559 asap. | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1293960742597734403 2020-08-13 10:20:56 -0700 <VicUgochukwu> An interesting day it was yesterday when #Ethereum's transaction fees surpassed Block rewards for the first time. the fees per transaction have also risen high as we saw during the peak of the ICO mania of 2018. Perhaps EIP-1559 will come to the rescue https://t.co/f3Q3BmZR4G | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1293961166528675845 2020-08-13 10:22:37 -0700 <Alexintosh> @eip1559 @PieDAO_DeFi Months of preparation required for what is about to come. https://t.co/y5tlAiEjSS | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1294017284978155521 2020-08-13 14:05:37 -0700 <FinanceLeo> @hardhathen @crypt0snews Just tell your landlord that EIP-1559 is right around the corner I’m sure he’ll understand | 1 replies 0 retweets 13 likes | |
| 1294030627004530688 2020-08-13 14:58:38 -0700 <CB_Nielsen> @Breedlove22 For an even more aggressive supply policy see ETH and read EIP-1559. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1294058440336130048 2020-08-13 16:49:09 -0700 <AlexSaundersAU> @KaiAnsaari @NuggetsNewsAU @mwill_crypto - dozens of scaling solutions being implemented - better tech took short cuts. ETH will still win - #Stablecoin growth on ETH is a great thing - ETH2.0 is literally happening now - $ETH is more scarce than $BTC after #EIP1559 - ETH is outperforming majority $ALTS for a reason | 1 replies 0 retweets 11 likes | |
| 1294084385780760576 2020-08-13 18:32:15 -0700 <ethlongmusk> @evan_van_ness Let's get EIP-1559 and 2.0 up and running or the gas fees are gonna murder us. | 0 replies 0 retweets 6 likes | |
| 1294093123627425798 2020-08-13 19:06:58 -0700 <BTCbuddah> @eip1559 @bneiluj What platform is this one? | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1294161588178391040 2020-08-13 23:39:01 -0700 <KryptoArthur> When is EIP 1559 gonna be implemented on Ethereum? I am not paying $25 for a trade on Uniswap. I'm not a whale and for the size of the trade, it doesn't make any sense whatsoever. #DeFi was supposed to be for the small time guys as well. Not just for whales. $eth | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1294168117694869504 2020-08-14 00:04:58 -0700 <eitank> The race to fill the void is on: @cz_binance @justinsuntron @IOHK_Charles but also eip-1559 and @optimismPBC | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1294239122157076486 2020-08-14 04:47:07 -0700 <Crypto_schmust> Hey @VitalikButerin do you think EIP 1559 is a good solution to reduce the transaction fees until #Ethereum 2 is ready to launch? | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1294270076435206145 2020-08-14 06:50:07 -0700 <TokenVision99> @JustinBennettFX 10k was what I was projecting in 5 years, 100k welp.. that would be insane but I wouldn't complain. EIP-1559 could make Ethereum deflationary, so I don't doubt it at all, add in a bit of fomo and speculation anything is possible. 🙂 | 2 replies 0 retweets 7 likes | |
| 1294272900015575043 2020-08-14 07:01:20 -0700 <FigoETH> @EtherSchtroumpf @QWQiao @mrjasonchoi @JosephTodaro_ ETH value capture is clear: - DeFi lockup making ETH more scarce - PoS making ETH more scarce / generating interest 3-5% longterm (interesting for institutional actors in 5yrs+) - EIP 1559 translating usage in ETH burn, making it more scarce | 0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1294284813881335810 2020-08-14 07:48:40 -0700 <omynuts> @paddypisa Mad Props any.sender for pointing out this massive Tragedy of the commons thats going on with gas prices. I honestly feel that there is an opportunity to put out a EIP standard around this that wallets can implement ASAP while EIP-1559 is being worked on. | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1294290780362665988 2020-08-14 08:12:23 -0700 <omynuts> @paddypisa ERC, rather. @danfinlay keen to hear your thoughts on this. It seems that EIP-1559 is at least 12 months away and its going to be a while before Dapps can run on L2. | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1294347881915117569 2020-08-14 11:59:17 -0700 <DeFi_Dad> @eip1559 @dydxprotocol Winning ETH comes from others losing ETH. Is that all you’re asking or can I help more? | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1294350112907567109 2020-08-14 12:08:09 -0700 <andrewriley777> The #ETH move is different from the speculative mania of 2017 where people were only buying to see price go up. Now there are reasons to buy such as PoS rewards, access to an exploding defi market, long term sharing system, EIP1559 monetary policy / scarcity. | 2 replies 1 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1294355036282052608 2020-08-14 12:27:43 -0700 <DeFi_Dad> @eip1559 @dydxprotocol Check the funding rate. The 8hr funding rate is negative if the market is too short and hence we need to pay longs interest. If it’s positive, the funding rate pays shorts to incentivize more to short and bring mid market price down to what the oracle price says. | 2 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1294355352557821952 2020-08-14 12:28:58 -0700 <AntonioMJuliano> @eip1559 @DeFi_Dad @dydxprotocol There is always exactly the same short and long interest | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1294360734995034114 2020-08-14 12:50:21 -0700 <cryptow1re> reddit 🤖: EIP 1559 : difference between actual fees and tips ? https://t.co/nXm69DsILi | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1294363153975980033 2020-08-14 12:59:58 -0700 <CryptoCryptoNe3> EIP 1559 : difference between actual fees and tips ? CRYPTO CRYPTO NEWS - https://t.co/kil3bLOju4 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1294365021472985088 2020-08-14 13:07:23 -0700 <veliko_test3> EIP 1559 : difference between actual fees and tips ? https://t.co/Xuaw3B3qYG | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1294368534655459328 2020-08-14 13:21:21 -0700 <tarangkhaitan> @TrustlessState Side quest that needs to be complete asap :- EIP 1559 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1294377546671443968 2020-08-14 13:57:10 -0700 <r_Ethereum> EIP 1559 : difference between actual fees and tips ? #Ethereum https://t.co/YkHSpw1wMy | 0 replies 1 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1294382044026245120 2020-08-14 14:15:02 -0700 <x3tko> EIP 1559 : difference between actual fees and tips ? #reddit #ethereum #ETH #cryptocurrency https://t.co/S1XLeSfZIS | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1294436722428661760 2020-08-14 17:52:18 -0700 <illusioncrypto> @SatoshiBadger @hxrobtc Ethereum 2.0, EIP 1559 Burning, Staking Demand More Daps > More Contracts > More computations > More Gas Needed > More ETH Needed | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1294448103303417856 2020-08-14 18:37:32 -0700 <Rewkang> @eip1559 @chamath Chamath please publically launch Social Capital on @mooniswap | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1294450866313814021 2020-08-14 18:48:30 -0700 <illusioncrypto> @iwearahoodie @hxrobtc @antiprosynth Once both EIP-1559 and PoS are implemented, at 10mn total stake, the network would be issuing ~1550 ETH/day and burning ~1400 ETH/day. So, the network would be operating securely at near 0 issuance. | 1 replies 0 retweets 10 likes | |
| 1294527857268363265 2020-08-14 23:54:26 -0700 <chubchubkun> ガス代高い！だからフィーの仕組み変えるインセンティブが生まれる。今こそEIP1559が採用されやすい土壌が整った訳だ。 | 1 replies 1 retweets 11 likes | |
| 1294532394502901761 2020-08-15 00:12:28 -0700 <Yamaoka_btc> コロナが無ければ今のスケジュールで良かったんだろうけどね 取り敢えずEIP 1559が来たらかなり改善はされるはずなのでそこから先は楽しみしかない | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1294533431184035840 2020-08-15 00:16:35 -0700 <Davis224Jake> EIP 1559 : difference between actual fees and tips ? via /r/ethereum I was reading about EIP 1559 ( which seems very promising ) and didn't understand what keeps tips from climbing like actual fees.If we can prioritize our transaction with a high tip, why is this different f… https://t.co/0CSRDej2ok | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1294535607637676033 2020-08-15 00:25:14 -0700 <DomainAddress4u> EIP 1559 : difference between actual fees and tips ? via /r/ethereum https://t.co/LGtGumhpQj hot 🔥 in #reddit #ethereum #eth #crypto | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1294535832456462338 2020-08-15 00:26:08 -0700 <nakajo> @chubchubkun 現状はdefiの過熱による高騰なので、EIP-1559では結局tipの高騰に変わるだけで状況はそんなに変化しないようにも思います。 | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1294571664953372672 2020-08-15 02:48:31 -0700 <CryptoBlkChnTec> @hudsonjameson Wait until they take over a meeting demanding you implement EIP1559 in Berlin. It is coming and you will bow down once again to them. | 0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1294578924962250758 2020-08-15 03:17:22 -0700 <ITPragmatics> @TetotRemi Non-sovereign internet native money that backs a programmable non-sovereign emerging economic market. ETH2 staking ≈ ETH sovereign bonds. EIP-1559 will also establish ETH as a deflationary currency, or “super-sound money” | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1294582510207356928 2020-08-15 03:31:37 -0700 <PaoloRebuffo> My favorite scaling projects built for/on #ethereum 1- #TurboGeth 2- Eip 1559 3- zkStuff (e.g. @the_matter_labs #zync) 4- state/payment channels Stuff (e.g. @raiden_network) 5-sidechains (@poanetwork #xDai #Plasma Stuff) 6- ETH 2.0 phase 1 and 2 Exactly in this order | 1 replies 0 retweets 7 likes | |
| 1294585134662823937 2020-08-15 03:42:02 -0700 <harithk17> @kaiynne Maybe a 50/50 split for personal and social gains (still need to align some personal interest). Instead of farms by tokens (LINK, MKR, etc), we can do farms by goods/causes (EIP1559, climate change). NFT badges to those who fund consistently. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1294625891696484361 2020-08-15 06:24:00 -0700 <ETHPlanet> #Ethereum gas fees hit ATH this week. Do you think it's a good problem to have? Will EIP-1559 be able to solve the gas price problem? Let's hear what Tomasz @tkstanczak - the founder of @nethermindeth says about it: https://t.co/VKZ1E61UIy | 1 replies 1 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1294646951200165888 2020-08-15 07:47:41 -0700 <GabrielFox_1> @phil_eth Agreed something needs to be done about this DeFi mess. Eth needs real world use cases, otherwise it will lose to cosmos, near Solana and the rest of it's competition if this keeps up. EIP-1559 and 2.0 can't come soon enough. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1294703517089792000 2020-08-15 11:32:27 -0700 <sybilesystem> @crypt0snews @BitGlen Include to that EIP-1559 and stacking for future of Ethereum | 0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1294771038274768896 2020-08-15 16:00:45 -0700 <0xTycoon> @CosmicV @TBoehmCrypto @crypt0snews @BitGlen Bitcoin currently inflates at around 2% $ETH will be the first to drop this to under 1% once PoS is deployed. With the addition of EIP1559, which will burn ETH, we will see deflation of the supply. Meanwhile BTC will continue to inflate for many years to come. | 1 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1294806365647646720 2020-08-15 18:21:08 -0700 <redphonecrypto> Agreed. All this value will make its way to $ETH (with the caveat that they must get their shit together and make 2.0 happen this year. EIP-1559 will make ETH money, too. I haven’t yet ruled out a flippening.) | 2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1294823334341992450 2020-08-15 19:28:34 -0700 <4Tendies> @ColinTCrypto @Sameer478231 @CryptoLinky A coin on eth can be worth more than eth in the short term but in the long term when you have more coins and more transaction burns with eip 1559 eth will be higher | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1294925221376323584 2020-08-16 02:13:25 -0700 <Jad_Kobeissi> @BitGlen @crypt0snews Eth isnt unlimited.. its limited but uncapped. 3k tons of gold is mined yearly but gold is SoV. Scarcity is about demand/supply. Nevertheless, PoS + EIP1559 will make the coin deflationary. | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1295094547869990918 2020-08-16 13:26:16 -0700 <0xCristiano> @BatmanDeFi How relevant will these L2 solutions be when ETH's tps increases by multiple orders of magnitude and they implement EIP-1559? | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1295118733518790658 2020-08-16 15:02:22 -0700 <digital_monad> Ooof. We need to get EIP1559 in soon. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1295135399279497218 2020-08-16 16:08:36 -0700 <gdudg> @zoink @darkforest_eth Can someone remind me why EIP 1559 needs to wait til after ETH 2.0 launch? Fee burn this past week would have been amazing. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1295149865757028352 2020-08-16 17:06:05 -0700 <JasonH3ss> @DTAPCAP I thought Samson did a terrible job representing Bitcoin. Ethereum isn't finished yet but its ambitions are much larger than Bitcoin. Ethereum likely will become deflationary with EIP-1559. They both will have a place in the future, but I think ether has more upside | 0 replies 0 retweets 18 likes | |
| 1295151142914097152 2020-08-16 17:11:09 -0700 <iamDCinvestor> @pierre_rochard @DTAPCAP Are you familiar with the concept of fee burn being discussed as a part of EIP-1559? Are you aware that this would destroy the supply alongside issuance, possibly hitting periods of net negative issuance? And are you aware that PoS issuance is likely to be far less than PoW? | 2 replies 2 retweets 13 likes | |
| 1295174926060515329 2020-08-16 18:45:40 -0700 <Raullen> #Burndrop Ignite goes well as increasingly $IOTX staked everyday This gives us great confidence in the upcoming massive launch of #Ucam and activation of new economics scheme on-chain Burndrop and #EIP1559 share the same idea - let the protocol capture the value of #DAU https://t.co/UFFJC5qIL9 | 1 replies 8 retweets 16 likes | |
| 1295177778267131904 2020-08-16 18:57:00 -0700 <hudsonjameson> @BitsBeTrippin @VitalikButerin It seems like a pretty new EIP without obvious community support so I don't really have that much to comment on. I did inform the authors that it would be a good idea to consider the impact of the reduction combined with EIP 1559. | 3 replies 0 retweets 10 likes | |
| 1295190485502267393 2020-08-16 19:47:29 -0700 <owocki> Spent some time tonight hacking together a "Wall of Love" for each @gitcoin grant. 🧱❣️ Wall of Love = Leaderboard of comments paying contributors left 💰💬 Here is the EIP 1559 grant's "Wall of Love". Should we release this? 🤔 https://t.co/dAUyW72TMe | 1 replies 5 retweets 20 likes | |
| 1295221943474454528 2020-08-16 21:52:30 -0700 <fubuloubu> I like EIP1559 because it realizes a unique vision of Ether as a productive asset with continuous dividends in the form of a transaction fee burn. I hate nearly everything else about it. Wouldn't miners prefer including fee burns too, even if they lost those rewards? | 1 replies 1 retweets 8 likes | |
| 1295243233757474816 2020-08-16 23:17:06 -0700 <Thaddeus19> 7/ Dejar de buscar cual es mejor y unir fuerzas para poder salir adelante; no sabemos si la solución es lightning network, sharding, eip-1559, PoS, DPoS. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1295265793404526594 2020-08-17 00:46:44 -0700 <attug> @hudsonjameson @BitsBeTrippin @VitalikButerin what's the status of EIP 1559? when will the transition take place? | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1295298118649610243 2020-08-17 02:55:11 -0700 <FixedNotStable> @SecretSalsa_ IMO the crash for DeFi is near. I still have a decent position in $MFT though, but otherwise all in ETH. Besides, ETH has some strong fundamentals for this end of the year, with ETH 2.0's Phase 0 launch, as well as EIP-1559. Pretty bullish IMO. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1295307910730461185 2020-08-17 03:34:06 -0700 <Agusx1211> EIP1559 > EIP2878 | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1295317363190112258 2020-08-17 04:11:39 -0700 <IslandHunting> @hasufl Hasu, When EIP-1559 results in negative net issuance, will you no longer worry about this? | 1 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1295322741592268800 2020-08-17 04:33:02 -0700 <MorganTBennett> @josephjpeters @edmundedgar It *is* the future. But let's be honest, it seems to be the far future. I am concerned that EIP-1559 will not happen for a long time (multiple years) cause it'll break most stuff running on Ethereum right now. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1295357307560263684 2020-08-17 06:50:23 -0700 <zeroknowledgefm> 🔊 Last week, @AnnaRRose & @gakonst chatted with @hasufl about elastic block size proposals. Covering the history of these proposals in #Bitcoin, #Ethereum and the unique properties of EIP-1559! https://t.co/7hyjbyJyr8 Thanks to @LongBlackFlat for the transcript! | 1 replies 6 retweets 25 likes | |
| 1295365618099802113 2020-08-17 07:23:24 -0700 <hasufl> This podcast is a spinoff from that ongoing work similar to our articles on EIP-1559 and 2593. We explore - why blocks shouldn't be too large or too small - why the optimal size can change over time - the design space for changing the blocksize (cont) https://t.co/YJOwcXe3DA | 1 replies 0 retweets 14 likes | |
| 1295365619215413251 2020-08-17 07:23:25 -0700 <hasufl> - the history of blocksize proposals in Bitcoin - how to make elastic blocksize proposals work, with EIP-1559 as a case study - finally, a new proposal that we've been thinking about for Bitcoin I've enjoyed this discussion very much, thank you @AnnaRRose for hosting us! | 1 replies 3 retweets 12 likes | |
| 1295370521803137024 2020-08-17 07:42:53 -0700 <hasufl> Re: "we can burn fees without full EIP-1559": it's not actually possible to do basefee+tip without the elastic blocksize component that sets a protocol-enforced minimum fee. if you did that, no one would pay any basefee and hence nothing would be burned. all fees'd be in the tip | 4 replies 2 retweets 11 likes | |
| 1295370957280903174 2020-08-17 07:44:37 -0700 <hasufl> and if you do set a protocol-enforced minimum fee, then you really want it to be dynamic and not static. so there's no point in entertaining this idea, unfortunately (we have tried to find a way to break up EIP-1559 into smaller components - we just didn't find a way how) | 0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1295371148243468288 2020-08-17 07:45:23 -0700 <fubuloubu> @hasufl Doesn't that make it the perfect way to introduce it then? This way basefee can start at zero while EIP 1559 is being perfected, and we can test the theory that miners wouldn't accept burned fees because they're economically rational. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1295372027851878402 2020-08-17 07:48:52 -0700 <hasufl> @fubuloubu 2) in EIP-1559 miners don't "accept burned fees". they have to pay the minimum fee to include any txns at all, and if they're economically rational they recoup it from users. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1295373265893031938 2020-08-17 07:53:48 -0700 <fubuloubu> @hasufl This is what makes it interesting though, in the worst case it looks just like the current fee market. We might see some limited organic adoption of fee burning. Then we should see it work as expected when EIP-1559 is introduced, but all the tooling is already updated for that. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1295376421280534531 2020-08-17 08:06:20 -0700 <fubuloubu> @hasufl I think that since `basefee` is an addon to the transaction structure, it is unlikely anyone "intellectually disabled" would be knowledgeable enough to use it. It is up to tooling integrators to make use of the new field, and prepare for a future where EIP 1559 is real. | 2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1295389137307140102 2020-08-17 08:56:52 -0700 <cyber_hokie> @hasufl @realLedgerwatch Though @hasufl do you think taking into account EIP-1559 and fee burn is enough to offset that actual affects of the “added inflation” of ETH2 issuance? | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1295392656575660032 2020-08-17 09:10:51 -0700 <cyber_hokie> @hasufl @realLedgerwatch Sure. On paper I agree issuance ^ with addition of ETH2. But with EIP-1559 the impact of that is largely offset by the feee burn if consumption/demand remain unchanged. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1295458158631165958 2020-08-17 13:31:08 -0700 <fubuloubu> @wekabot @hasufl I think it can be the foundation of a sound technical decision, as it reduces the complexity of integrating EIP 1559 when it's ready. If we want to commit to that change, it needs to happy sooner than later. It's a very easy change now to add `basefee` and just have it set to 0. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1295510083737010177 2020-08-17 16:57:28 -0700 <shingen_crypto> EIP1559と2878は要注目。 とは言えL2＆Composability問題が解決しないと根本的な解決にはならないけど… | 0 replies 1 retweets 6 likes | |
| 1295544298830614528 2020-08-17 19:13:25 -0700 <owocki> EIP 1559; status: Draft ... https://t.co/phTCdmefiY | 1 replies 1 retweets 20 likes | |
| 1295572198531399681 2020-08-17 21:04:17 -0700 <nanexcool> @eip1559 @RuneKek @MakerDAO Yes. Much respect 💪 | 0 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1295639894337847297 2020-08-18 01:33:17 -0700 <iwearahoodie> A tipping point is coming where people will begin to understand the ramifications of EIP1559. | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1295640539602259969 2020-08-18 01:35:51 -0700 <iotacom> @iwearahoodie Hi. What is eip1559 ？ | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1295668414539866114 2020-08-18 03:26:37 -0700 <johnsmith3264> @AkadoSang Also inflation will be lower than $BTC when $ETH switches to PoS. Possibly deflationary under EIP 1559 with fee burn. https://t.co/lj5NY97MeV | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1295668694782291968 2020-08-18 03:27:43 -0700 <PaoloRebuffo> 7/n Also in preparation for #EIP1559 I hope that a scientific approach with an appropriate suite of measurements and tests with attack vector simulations to find out WHAT an acceptable #gaslimit per block is REALLY acceptable will be seriously considered. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1295678300942196736 2020-08-18 04:05:54 -0700 <AnettRolikova> @andrej_muzevic @wekabot @fubuloubu @hasufl So is EIP-1559 coming on chain (implemented) or not? Has someone dropped the sword or not yet? | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1295679659519221761 2020-08-18 04:11:18 -0700 <AnettRolikova> EIP-1559 has it's own twitter @eip1559 This really shows how this EIP is controversial Or maybe not | 3 replies 2 retweets 14 likes | |
| 1295689640498929666 2020-08-18 04:50:57 -0700 <DaniMesqEN> @AnettRolikova @eip1559 EIP-1559 will be bulish for the price of Ethereum; price, not value, bc was usability considered on its design? | 1 replies 1 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1295707820239675396 2020-08-18 06:03:12 -0700 <ETHPlanet> @AnettRolikova @eip1559 🔥🔥🔥 | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1295742730929283075 2020-08-18 08:21:55 -0700 <0xTycoon> @MesquitaDaniell @AnettRolikova @eip1559 yeah, it is postulated that EIP-1559 will improve UX since wallets will be able to predict gas prices more accurately. | 0 replies 1 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1295754990628347904 2020-08-18 09:10:38 -0700 <bneiluj> @eip1559 Same Fam, bro 😏 | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1295770507439112194 2020-08-18 10:12:17 -0700 <Chloethedev> @1inchExchange Eip-1559 and L2 solutions fighting for block space 👌🏽. Usable AND fun to watch 👀🍿. | 0 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1295888877001912325 2020-08-18 18:02:39 -0700 <AntonioMJuliano> @eip1559 @StarkWareLtd No, they will be on separate rollup chains | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1295948671687618560 2020-08-18 22:00:15 -0700 <Danny_Desert> @eip1559 @nanexcool @RuneKek @MakerDAO Respect | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1295952035276156929 2020-08-18 22:13:37 -0700 <jpr007> @eip1559 Thanks for the narrative Now how to translate that into a value or price for the shares in 2025 or 2030 ? | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1295953739900018688 2020-08-18 22:20:23 -0700 <jpr007> @eip1559 Bravo ! | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1295999102640160774 2020-08-19 01:20:39 -0700 <HewsonBrian> @eip1559 @jpr007 Not “scientific” but I like it ! | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1296002164758781952 2020-08-19 01:32:49 -0700 <jpr007> @HewsonBrian @eip1559 Perfectly “scientific” in its own empirical way Very difficult to argue whether it will prove to be more less accurate than some of the other methods employed | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1296002796244746240 2020-08-19 01:35:19 -0700 <jpr007> @HewsonBrian @eip1559 Its strength is that it captures the “sentiment” part of the market valuation along with the “scale” portion and perhaps the “profitability” portion That’s three pretty powerful proxies right there The purist’s complaint of course is that it does all that too indirectly | 1 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1296002935847923712 2020-08-19 01:35:53 -0700 <jpr007> @HewsonBrian @eip1559 But then maybe their alternative approaches have weaknesses of their own too | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1296033437657178113 2020-08-19 03:37:05 -0700 <nakajo> EIP-1559でgas feeが抑えられる仕組みがようやく理解できた。いくつか条件はあるもののほとんどの場合でfeeが抑えられそうかも？ | 2 replies 0 retweets 9 likes | |
| 1296066097536544768 2020-08-19 05:46:52 -0700 <CWilliamAshby> @eip1559 @jpr007 I just read this to my girl friend and she cheerily said "I hope you are right, but you all sound crazy!" Though I usually use, $amzn , $aapl and $googl 🤣 | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1296115336501055490 2020-08-19 09:02:31 -0700 <btc258> I just won a Above And Beyond Kudos by beating the 'Fixing the Ethereum Fee Market (EIP-1559) Quest' on @gitcoin quests. https://t.co/do6tH5jD1N | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1296123412335616000 2020-08-19 09:34:36 -0700 <twit_stanley> @eip1559 @jwangARK I’d like to know too. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1296134308210458624 2020-08-19 10:17:54 -0700 <_charlienoyes> @bergealex4 @BanklessHQ So similar to my views EIP-1559 and state rent in Ethereum's context, though obviously Bitcoin doesn't have the same parasitic application-layer incentive/MEV dynamics. Very interesting question. | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1296134388019650561 2020-08-19 10:18:13 -0700 <PRengganis27> @LID_Protocol @airdrop_op @Aditfsyah1 @Darma13126806 The dev tooling and ecosystem of Ethereum is far ahead of any other chain. That said, we need to see EIP1559 implemented soon or we will have to consider migrating due to the gas cost issue. TG: @RengganisOfficial #FutureisLID https://t.co/Uetk88KJ9p | 0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1296157780785520640 2020-08-19 11:51:11 -0700 <mccallios> @hasufl @devops199fan @YamFinance I really enjoyed the article and like the proof of work with proof of Steak". But I agree with above interesting twist, where a successful project will have the ability to build treasury from rebasing inflation. It is almost like eip 1559, but only if project is expanding | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1296186746288386051 2020-08-19 13:46:16 -0700 <SawyerMerritt> @eip1559 https://t.co/Z65fOZkVEP | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1296195184070234112 2020-08-19 14:19:48 -0700 <d24nOrg> The Decentralization Foundation has engaged Professor Tim Roughgarden @algo_class to give an economic analysis of EIP-1559 and the Ethereum price mechanism: https://t.co/QMhP1KMvuh | 1 replies 49 retweets 196 likes | |
| 1296288957714448385 2020-08-19 20:32:26 -0700 <btc258> I just won a Eth-future Kudos by beating the 'EIP 1559 Fee Market Quest' on @gitcoin quests. https://t.co/Ul1lCVi78v | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1296334181371240448 2020-08-19 23:32:08 -0700 <HaiderSF> How Will Ethereum 2.0 Staking & EIP-1559 Affect the Value of ETH? https://t.co/kgAyQsgcQL | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1296377437228597249 2020-08-20 02:24:01 -0700 <moazzamak> @EthereumNetw @makoto_inoue @antiprosynth Asking them if they have a certain bias and trusting their word is precisely what crypto wanted to avoid. IMO if Ethereum wants to retain long term interest it needs to make the token valuable via EIP1559 or similar mechanism. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1296451660588474368 2020-08-20 07:18:57 -0700 <EDCON_Official> @icebearhww gave us an introduction about eth2 phase 1. Hsiao-Wei said they’re planning to introduce an EIP-1559 style approach for the fee market to adjust the gas price. She also talked about crosslinking, custody games, shard networking, the challenges, and more. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1296511854265667584 2020-08-20 11:18:08 -0700 <OneWayToAll> How Will Ethereum 2.0 Staking & EIP-1559 Affect the Value of ETH? #Ethereum via https://t.co/0ydu6yLH1s https://t.co/TJ8T8FZkLL | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1296564926891192321 2020-08-20 14:49:02 -0700 <cburniske> @eip1559 @AragonProject @jmonegro said it better than I could have: https://t.co/WTjGh0rKJ2 We've both worked with the Aragon team for years now, Joel longer than myself. We've been impressed with their resilience, drive & commitment to evolve a DAO-protocol+Digital Jurisdiction to suit the times. | 4 replies 4 retweets 24 likes | |
| 1296565792172122112 2020-08-20 14:52:28 -0700 <RyanBerckmans> 2/ It may be a common misconception that validator rewards or EIP-1559's fee burn are revenue streams for the broader population of ETH holders. They are not. They may affect the price of ETH indirectly in all sorts of ways, but aren't revenue. | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1296585497494654976 2020-08-20 16:10:46 -0700 <stevenmarkryan> @eip1559 4 | 1 replies 0 retweets 7 likes | |
| 1296600678698225667 2020-08-20 17:11:06 -0700 <Ragazaga5> @eip1559 @stevenmarkryan Think he means if you divide 😂 but you are correct. The difference is calculated using subtraction. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1296621232553517057 2020-08-20 18:32:46 -0700 <austingriffith> @eip1559 Check out https://t.co/LdM8jLNL7H | 0 replies 0 retweets 11 likes | |
| 1296627549234171906 2020-08-20 18:57:52 -0700 <stellabelle> @Kica333 @eip1559 Sign me up | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1296633329844797440 2020-08-20 19:20:50 -0700 <Crypto_Plato> @cburniske @eip1559 @AragonProject @jmonegro Don't forget about scamming projects on their platform and dragging random people to the magic money 'Aragon court' against their consent. Shill those bags! | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1296674082079965184 2020-08-20 22:02:46 -0700 <PJusername> @AlexSaundersAU @100trillionUSD @RaoulGMI @ErikVoorhees @TrustlessState @RyanSAdams @VitalikButerin @sassal0x @kaiynne Alex serious question... What happens with h S2F if issuance becomes negative with #EIP1559? | 2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1296702258000912384 2020-08-20 23:54:44 -0700 <licuende> @cburniske @eip1559 @AragonProject @jmonegro Thanks Chris, it means a lot!! | 0 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1296702534300528642 2020-08-20 23:55:50 -0700 <Bifabu_china> @cburniske @eip1559 @AragonProject @jmonegro Thanks Chris, it means a lot!! | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1296714771794993154 2020-08-21 00:44:28 -0700 <William94029369> @eip1559 @austingriffith You can DM me, I can try and get you started. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1296814230637699072 2020-08-21 07:19:40 -0700 <ioTalent_> @AndreCronjeTech @eip1559 👀 | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1296830350648397831 2020-08-21 08:23:44 -0700 <GBogran> @RyanSAdams Congressman, the gas price is too damn high!! We need to pass EIP-1559 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1296857677457481728 2020-08-21 10:12:19 -0700 <gakonst> Last week @AnnaRRose & I chatted with @hasufl about Bitcoin’s security & block size. Topics: - Why block size matters - Past block size change proposals (incl. Flexcap!) - Block size change design space - EIP1559 - Future ideas https://t.co/YrUwFPab7B (transcript inside) | 1 replies 5 retweets 36 likes | |
| 1296882829494804485 2020-08-21 11:52:16 -0700 <iamDCinvestor> What's keeping us from doing a standalone fork to get EIP-1559 implemented ASAP? What needs to be evaluated, coded, tested, etc. at this point? Could/should we have a dedicated fork- separate from the "approx 1-2 fork per year" schedule? @JHancock @TimBeiko | 1 replies 11 retweets 101 likes | |
| 1296884612275359744 2020-08-21 11:59:21 -0700 <iamDCinvestor> Good overview thread from @TimBeiko on the status of EIP-1559, and what still needs to be done to turn it into reality 👇 | 0 replies 6 retweets 29 likes | |
| 1296885704379846656 2020-08-21 12:03:41 -0700 <meeseeking> @TimBeiko @iamDCinvestor @JHancock @barnabemonnot As usual, thanks for all that Tim. Similar to the OP, I think EIP-1559 is such an important relief for ETH 1.x right now and it helps alleviate a constraint which is acute now and is unlikely to abate ever again, until EIP-1559, L2's and ETH 2.0 help relieve the pressure. | 1 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1296886744831258624 2020-08-21 12:07:49 -0700 <TimBeiko> There haven't been tons of public EIP-1559 updates as of late (though there's an implementers' call next friday! https://t.co/3Pc24p0ihY), so I gave a tweet-sized one replying to @iamDCinvestor below 😁⬇️ | 1 replies 8 retweets 26 likes | |
| 1296889581342732290 2020-08-21 12:19:05 -0700 <RyanSAdams> A vegetable-emoji based DeFi ponzi game with 10% of each positive rebase going to support EIP1559 development and @peter_szilagyi's geth team | 6 replies 5 retweets 85 likes | |
| 1296889834452275201 2020-08-21 12:20:06 -0700 <jdetychey> When will we get a DeFi degen farming protocol that funnel a share of its yield to EIP-1559 ? | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1296920419778342912 2020-08-21 14:21:38 -0700 <0xMidnight> Very interesting to see: the Decentralization Foundation has engaged Columbia's Professor Tim Roughgarden, "a leading algorithmic game theorist", to perform economic analysis of EIP-1559. | 1 replies 11 retweets 22 likes | |
| 1296926885755199489 2020-08-21 14:47:19 -0700 <0xMidnight> @0xdanm Apparently this was discussed a while back in the EIP-1559 research channel, but I'm just learning about him today as well. He seems like a good fit: https://t.co/G172huJ8H3 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1296931023968538624 2020-08-21 15:03:46 -0700 <shemnon> @TimBeiko @mysticryuujin @greerso @JHancock Eip-1559 must test on a full scale POW network. Running in a network with a fixed block delay like clique is the easy part. Wait until there are 1 minute blocks and a wave of 2 second blocks. Irregular block production is what will really stress test it. | 0 replies 3 retweets 8 likes | |
| 1296933094121971713 2020-08-21 15:12:00 -0700 <KateMitselmakhe> In terms of Ethereum's monetary policy, EIP 1559 is the last remaining "puzzle piece" because it "establishes 'the market rate' for block inclusion and "burns the majority of the ETH in the transaction fee." Great insights! @TrustlessState @realtplatform https://t.co/XlgNjR5wls | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1296938736316551176 2020-08-21 15:34:25 -0700 <blockgod32> @eip1559 @MakerDAO Of course | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1296939534907772928 2020-08-21 15:37:35 -0700 <aturnis> @eip1559 @Gfilche @TeslaPodcast Who's Moe? Also, Raiden ruined Sons of Liberty for me. Cool character, but not what I came for. | 2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1296960613940432905 2020-08-21 17:01:21 -0700 <ChampionsCrypto> @eip1559 @schilmeister24 @CathieDWood rekt | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1296989883253190657 2020-08-21 18:57:39 -0700 <Crypto_Plato> @NickSzabo4 @notgrubles If there were no Vlad Zamfir, would you like ETH more? Do you know about EIP-1559? It plans to make ETH deflationary (possibly) What if we're in Genesis and it's day 3 of creation? Just a few more years and the Russian child god will step aside Crypto deism | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1296993941896572934 2020-08-21 19:13:47 -0700 <iwearahoodie> This seems like a somewhat important fix for anyone trying to get an understanding of EIP1559 #ethereum @hasufl @zhusu https://t.co/b1uZty8Z0L | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1297119330417680384 2020-08-22 03:32:02 -0700 <AnettRolikova> Amazing update on what's up with EIP-1559 🤩 Kudos to @TimBeiko for update and everyone who's working on make it happen & putting time and energy into it 🙏 | 0 replies 1 retweets 24 likes | |
| 1297143265234493440 2020-08-22 05:07:08 -0700 <realLedgerwatch> Please bookmark this new piece by Micah, "EIP-1559 51% Attacks: Should you live in fear?". It is written to be referenced every time someone new comes around and suggest mining coalition keeping BASEFEE down by mining empty blocks: https://t.co/1gfImBjEez | 4 replies 25 retweets 118 likes | |
| 1297173075763527680 2020-08-22 07:05:36 -0700 <cryptow1re> reddit 🤖: EIP-1559 51% Attacks: Should you live in fear? https://t.co/xO0Y5iVLU3 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1297173265543299072 2020-08-22 07:06:21 -0700 <cryptow1re> #ethtrader 🤖: EIP-1559 51% Attacks: Should you live in fear? https://t.co/AMQ9HR5LCa | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1297182747019141120 2020-08-22 07:44:02 -0700 <cryptow1re> reddit 🤖: Update on EIP-1559 https://t.co/82Fc5RNVjI | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1297188574257963008 2020-08-22 08:07:11 -0700 <veliko_test3> Update on EIP-1559 https://t.co/ZcuAQHijcn | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1297201157174108160 2020-08-22 08:57:11 -0700 <r_Ethereum> Update on EIP-1559 #Ethereum https://t.co/g0ANplQHvc | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1297224600376549377 2020-08-22 10:30:20 -0700 <JiiPee15> @ADAphant @AmateoRa Pure IQ 85 post Gas fees can easily be fixed (f.ex. OMG network, that just integrated tehter. Microfees) Also for that unlimited supply of yours, what is EIP 1559, btfo You should also know that thers like at least 5 differend solutions for transaction speeds, just lrn2googl | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1297262290098458624 2020-08-22 13:00:06 -0700 <wekabot> A good analysis of the profitability of colluding to drive down the miner fee in EIP 1559. I'd still like to see a formal analysis, but this is fairly persuasive. | 2 replies 5 retweets 56 likes | |
| 1297262620886499328 2020-08-22 13:01:25 -0700 <willmorriss4> @realLedgerwatch 1. EIP 1559 collusion does not put us back where we are now; it reduces the average block size which drives up gas fees. 2. The cartel doesn’t mine empty blocks; they mine blocks below the BASEFEE increase threshold, and uncle fuller blocks. | 2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1297315212111097861 2020-08-22 16:30:24 -0700 <cryptow1re> reddit 🤖: Update and roadmap for getting EIP-1559 live on mainnet https://t.co/KkwDIgDgVT | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1297315435982082050 2020-08-22 16:31:17 -0700 <cryptow1re> #ethtrader 🤖: Update and roadmap for getting EIP-1559 live on mainnet https://t.co/8pmnMiKXFB | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1297340936431603713 2020-08-22 18:12:37 -0700 <wekabot> @willmorriss4 @realLedgerwatch In fact, all the profits you could make as an eip1559 cartel can be made by a cartel now; forming a cartel afterwards gets you the same thing forming a cartel now would. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1297387253346349056 2020-08-22 21:16:40 -0700 <degen_julian> EIP 1559. | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1297417181345591296 2020-08-22 23:15:35 -0700 <FigoETH> @tbr90 @renprotocol @thorchain_org The main reasons I personally see for becoming ETH very valuable: - reserve asset for future global settlement layer - becoming more scarce with PoS, EIP 1559 and DeFi lockup (SoV) - staking in PoS with 3-5% likely very attractive longterm (2030) for institutional investors | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1297430574185947136 2020-08-23 00:08:48 -0700 <jjrtennis> @eip1559 @WholeMarsBlog @MunroAssociates Solid team over there :) | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1297432513774858240 2020-08-23 00:16:31 -0700 <Davis224Jake> Update on EIP-1559 via /r/ethereum https://t.co/mcYkkks7S1 https://t.co/80NLmLIuUM #Crypto #Ether #CoinOfferings https://t.co/UyopESdFZI | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1297434740232945664 2020-08-23 00:25:21 -0700 <DomainAddress4u> Update on EIP-1559 via /r/ethereum https://t.co/k5j14EfqLb hot 🔥 in #reddit #ethereum #eth #crypto | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1297437608096612353 2020-08-23 00:36:45 -0700 <0xTycoon> @QWQiao EIP1559 yo! | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1297438111052509184 2020-08-23 00:38:45 -0700 <ian_e_richards> @eip1559 @WholeMarsBlog @MunroAssociates Talking heads (who don’t know): Tesla has tech. but GM does too, no moat. Sandy (who really does know): Tesla is already 10 years ahead, they move at the speed of thought, nobody is as fast as Tesla. Legacy is not catching up they are falling further behind! | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1297444054225973250 2020-08-23 01:02:22 -0700 <_jeffreyr> @eip1559 @WholeMarsBlog @MunroAssociates And don’t forget Earl & Norman @28delayslater | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1297525354526121986 2020-08-23 06:25:26 -0700 <defitimes> @GoingParabolic Or #ETH, thanks to @eip1559 it will be deflationary in 2021 | 1 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1297543721089552384 2020-08-23 07:38:24 -0700 <sassal0x> All I want for Christmas is EIP-1559 🔥 | 13 replies 25 retweets 279 likes | |
| 1297545048431575040 2020-08-23 07:43:41 -0700 <sassal0x> Okay if I can't have EIP-1559 I will settle for a new ETH all time high. Maker it happen Santa. | 4 replies 0 retweets 45 likes | |
| 1297548037678661632 2020-08-23 07:55:34 -0700 <rbin> @sassal0x REMEMBER! We can all help this happen by donating to the EIP-1559 community fund! 👍🏼🤘🏼 https://t.co/sH97hg25KX | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1297571196289142786 2020-08-23 09:27:35 -0700 <yaron_velner> @sassal0x Wouldn't EIP-1559 help reduce the gas price only when there are bursts of transactions (e.g., when there are big movements in ether price and the network is congested)? In the current situation where the network is always congested, it is not clear if it will help with gas price. | 2 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1297606492900790281 2020-08-23 11:47:50 -0700 <Ethprofit> Interesting update on EIP-1559 (Ethereum Improvement Proposals) progress $ETH #ETH #Ethereum | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1297613020655321089 2020-08-23 12:13:47 -0700 <wekabot> @danfinlay @DanFinlay3 A cartel that communicates is equivalent before or after EIP 1559. You then suggested that it could be done *without* communication, which I agree is different (but unviable). | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1297625687365361664 2020-08-23 13:04:07 -0700 <Tetranode> @intocryptoast ETH 2.0's staking returns is a dynamic equilibrium... if stakers defect to DeFi then the returns rises... this can work in reverse too. Staking will bolster DeFi returns and vice versa. Don't forget EIP-1559. How is DeFi a threat to 2.0? I'm not following here... | 2 replies 1 retweets 20 likes | |
| 1297704648778952704 2020-08-23 18:17:53 -0700 <jason_rassett> @eip1559 @1478397vw @WholeMarsBlog @elonmusk @Tesla I just had to go there... I hated every second of it. Waiting for 3rd row Y to tradein my wifes CRV. Just yuck! | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1297706551432470529 2020-08-23 18:25:26 -0700 <sassal0x> @yaron_velner My thoughts on the benefits of EIP-1559 below :) https://t.co/hyAvKogKiY | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1297738194860089345 2020-08-23 20:31:11 -0700 <ShyCybertruck> @eip1559 @WholeMarsBlog 🙃 I mean even if it could not be more obviously named, people should go google it before bitching about how much money they’re going to lose 😂 | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1297742714688155649 2020-08-23 20:49:08 -0700 <ShyCybertruck> @eip1559 @WholeMarsBlog I don’t pay them any attention, but WholeMars is always mocking them so follow him for idiocy reactions haha | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1297801365746520064 2020-08-24 00:42:12 -0700 <GeistLight> @DeFiWorldHQ @GoingParabolic @eip1559 This is lies, our trust in you is broken. We will make you obsolete. You blew past your original supply cap of 100 million and exceeded it by 12% (and counting) before you decided on a new, more flexible supply cap with eip1559. You won't fool anyone this time. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1297803077009850368 2020-08-24 00:49:00 -0700 <0xTycoon> @coingecko EIP1559 | 1 replies 0 retweets 7 likes | |
| 1297816852421369858 2020-08-24 01:43:44 -0700 <300winner> @eip1559 @Gambiste1 You mean $qure 😉but your right $crsp, $edit, $beam and $ntla have the future! | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1297830885740425221 2020-08-24 02:39:30 -0700 <hasufl> It‘s hard to overstate how big this is for Ethereum & the EIP-1559 community. Prof. Roughgarden is one of the leading experts in mechanism design in the world. | 7 replies 49 retweets 286 likes | |
| 1297883106137890816 2020-08-24 06:07:00 -0700 <sassal0x> EIP-1559 is a major upgrade that many Ethereans are looking forward to seeing implemented on the Ethereum mainnet. For today's piece, I've collected all of the latest information I could find on EIP-1559 for your reading pleasure. Check it out 👇 https://t.co/9IMsIxQYlh | 10 replies 75 retweets 247 likes | |
| 1297884114096238592 2020-08-24 06:11:00 -0700 <CryptoEliteNews> An Update on EIP-1559 - The Daily Gwei #57 Tracking one of Ethereum's most important upgrades. #ethereum #upgrade #eip #testnet https://t.co/ImzMvwAGiT | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1297884829086674946 2020-08-24 06:13:51 -0700 <sassal0x> @AlexMasmej Most EIPs are quite boring and no one really cares about them outside of the most involved community members. I think EIP-1559 is an exception because it touches on two key "mainstream" Ethereum narratives - "fixing" the fee market and burning ETH = number go up. | 1 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1297885693851701249 2020-08-24 06:17:17 -0700 <dmihal> @AlexMasmej @sassal0x I'd love to see a new name be created for it, especially as the idea spreads beyond Ethereum. There was talk about Filecoin integrating it (which would be very symbiotic for helping Ethereum integrate it), but obviously they can't call it EIP-1559. | 2 replies 1 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1297886006683635712 2020-08-24 06:18:32 -0700 <sassal0x> @dmihal @AlexMasmej They did call it EIP-1559 because that is the name/brand that everyone recognises at this point ;) https://t.co/V0krP3Fqal | 4 replies 1 retweets 8 likes | |
| 1297886139739705345 2020-08-24 06:19:03 -0700 <on_defi> An Update on EIP-1559 – The Daily Gwei #57 via @On_DeFi | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1297886218596880388 2020-08-24 06:19:22 -0700 <mudgen> @sassal0x Do you think EIP-1559 will make gas prices go down? | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1297889339003662337 2020-08-24 06:31:46 -0700 <sassal0x> @gakonst Ah nope I have no issues with that post and thought it was really great! My piece today was just to go over the "latest" updates with EIP-1559 that I figured most people hadn't seen yet. Will update the post with your piece now though :) | 0 replies 0 retweets 6 likes | |
| 1297891964151627776 2020-08-24 06:42:12 -0700 <tipsysquid> Not up to speed on EIP-1559 and why it's important? Check out this great concise post about it and a best guess timeline. Im most excited to learn other networks are already testing this EIP. | 3 replies 2 retweets 11 likes | |
| 1297898097234849792 2020-08-24 07:06:34 -0700 <nic__carter> @VitalikButerin @CoinDesk now fees are being lionized with EIP1559. nothing wrong with evolving ones position over time. generally the trend (with regards to fees, scaling, governance, the native unit "as money") is ethereum becoming more bitcoin-like with time | 3 replies 0 retweets 7 likes | |
| 1297899942086709250 2020-08-24 07:13:54 -0700 <Arthur_0x> Agree with @hasufl here, excited to see the thorough analysis and suggestions of Prof. Roughgarden on EIP-1559. | 0 replies 11 retweets 111 likes | |
| 1297902552223285249 2020-08-24 07:24:16 -0700 <brrabski> @VitalikButerin @nic__carter @CoinDesk How can you say this with EIP 1559 in the pipeline? | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1297904635710144517 2020-08-24 07:32:33 -0700 <DONUT_ethtrader> 🤖 🗣 An Update on EIP-1559 - The Daily Gwei #57 👉 https://t.co/ypHnrgIbt5 👈 $DONUT 🍩 $ETH ⟠ #DeFi 🌾 https://t.co/bzaBvr7opg | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1297908095767781376 2020-08-24 07:46:18 -0700 <mdespo26> Hey @sassal0x - When is the earliest EIP-1559 could be implemented? Phase 1? Which, if things go smooth, would be about 6 months to a year after the phase 0 launch which could happen this November. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1297908655040294912 2020-08-24 07:48:31 -0700 <arctechinc> @eip1559 😆 | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1297929757921644544 2020-08-24 09:12:23 -0700 <danfinlay> Very eager to read Prof Roughgarden’s analysis of eip-1559 and the escalator algorithm, and so hoping he does come upon an “optimal” mechanism! | 0 replies 2 retweets 13 likes | |
| 1297951099291410435 2020-08-24 10:37:11 -0700 <CoastalDegen> @TrustlessState If anything this exposes how dumb the current fee markets for eth are. Wen eip 1559 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1297955779035701249 2020-08-24 10:55:47 -0700 <fubuloubu> @TrustlessState @0xdeadf4ce @BanklessHQ @_charlienoyes MEV means the profit vs. fees paid shrinks as novel opportunities become more widespread, since more competitive entities bid the fee up to capture that profit. EIP 1559 only attempts to solve the fact that miners win in the long term. | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1297959787351736320 2020-08-24 11:11:42 -0700 <DefiRadio> just added #2: Su Zhu and Hasu on EIP-1559 by Uncommon Core https://t.co/FOlcw27Nd5 #DeFi | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1297968114056007683 2020-08-24 11:44:48 -0700 <undefinedza> This is fantastic news for Ethereum 🥳 Having such rigour applied to the mechanism design behind EIP1559 is of huge significance as we move beyond simple gas price auctions! | 0 replies 5 retweets 27 likes | |
| 1298008523389972480 2020-08-24 14:25:22 -0700 <das_grasshopper> Esto es algo de lo que había querido explicar desde hace tiempo: la propuesta EIP-1559 es un cambio al protocolo en cuestión de "quemar" una cierta cantidad base de ether en cada bloque. (un thread sobre EIP-1559) https://t.co/lYj0uPlWam | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1298010082681266176 2020-08-24 14:31:34 -0700 <das_grasshopper> Básicamente EIP1559 involucra remover de la circulación una cierta cantidad de ETH (que fluctúa, y se denomina BURN_FEE), que hace una redistribución económica de incentivos en el precio de las transacciones en Ethereum. Te invito a que investigues más sobre esta propuesta 🤟😎 | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1298010647955935233 2020-08-24 14:33:49 -0700 <das_grasshopper> En términos realistas, #EIP1559 todavía está en una fase de análisis muy fuerte, y se explica el proceso de prueba. Asimismo, @Filecoin y @CeloOrg están implementando mecanismos parecidos que darán más certidumbre sobre el comportamiento económico de esta propuesta. https://t.co/s3VM0lqgfl | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1298021285440761857 2020-08-24 15:16:05 -0700 <iamtheidentity> @notgrubles > What’s the Ethereum supply? > Professor Roughgarden will give you an economic analysis of EIP-1559 and the Ethereum price mechanism. Fucking dicks. | 1 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1298055224943423490 2020-08-24 17:30:56 -0700 <TOCNYS> @eip1559 @RobinhoodApp No black cat please, I'm not superstitious... but I am a little stitious | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1298069179250151424 2020-08-24 18:26:23 -0700 <AnselLindner> This tells me two important things about EIP-1559; 1) #Ethereum folks are engaging in an appeal to authority instead of simple reasoning, 2) the average person is not meant to understand it. No need to ask questions, all of them have been answered by super smart people. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1298086073302691841 2020-08-24 19:33:31 -0700 <EVBite> @eip1559 @WholeMarsBlog In your Tesla account Manage > Edit Configuration. It’s free | 1 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1298095330173636609 2020-08-24 20:10:18 -0700 <kostagotclear> @EVBite @eip1559 @WholeMarsBlog Are you required to currently have a Tesla on your account to do this? I don’t have a Tesla yet, but I do have a Cybertruck reservation. This is what happens when I sign into the Tesla app. I can’t get passed this screen. https://t.co/klnYff8zka | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1298099049250328578 2020-08-24 20:25:05 -0700 <ChainNewscom> 【哥伦比亚大学教授 Tim Roughgarden 将对以太坊 EIP-1559 提案进行研究】链闻消息，权力下放基金会（Decentralization Foundation）邀请哥伦比亚大学计算机科学系教授 Tim Ro…… https://t.co/uQxwc6FYwf | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1298101098939588609 2020-08-24 20:33:14 -0700 <EVBite> @kostagotclear @eip1559 @WholeMarsBlog Tesla app is activated when you go pickup your car. But you can login to your Tesla account on their website | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1298101713023508482 2020-08-24 20:35:40 -0700 <kostagotclear> @EVBite @eip1559 @WholeMarsBlog Thank you! | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1298104509344780289 2020-08-24 20:46:47 -0700 <marek_> @sassal0x Thanks for citing @CeloOrg! EIP1559 is particularly useful for Celo because of the native stablecoin (cUSD) and the need for reliable oracle updates 😃 | 1 replies 2 retweets 10 likes | |
| 1298111887356260352 2020-08-24 21:16:06 -0700 <momack28> Very cool! I believe the @Filecoin Testnet is the first live implementation of EIP-1559 under significant real-world load. Very interested in hearing what my old Prof thinks of it! | 0 replies 1 retweets 8 likes | |
| 1298117586555531264 2020-08-24 21:38:45 -0700 <DegenSpartan> imo all burns are shit probably the only exception i can think of is EIP-1559 | 10 replies 0 retweets 40 likes | |
| 1298118282717720576 2020-08-24 21:41:31 -0700 <DegenSpartan> imo the best review of eip1559 is here by @hasufl and @gakonst https://t.co/lnZkDy1D5B and the latest update on its status is by @sassal0x in yesterday's daily gwei https://t.co/IqldrAJeVQ | 0 replies 4 retweets 26 likes | |
| 1298152225403879425 2020-08-24 23:56:23 -0700 <YourETHGirl> Just because I would no more have to decide on gas fee and gas limit while signing off eth txs, I fkn love EIP-1559 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1298195421240729600 2020-08-25 02:48:02 -0700 <4Tendies> @eip1559 I dunno I'd hold a m2 forever lol | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1298196864014209025 2020-08-25 02:53:46 -0700 <ethlongmusk> @eip1559 Indeed, I've been pricing used Tesla's and at least around here, it's like the GPU market during the mining heyday. Used prices are almost indistinguishable from new. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1298197713683714049 2020-08-25 02:57:08 -0700 <4Tendies> @eip1559 Guess I'm holding eth to the grave | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1298220393904316418 2020-08-25 04:27:16 -0700 <least_nathan> @hasufl, @AnnaRRose, & @gakonst on Elastic Block sizes, incl EIP 1559 :chefs kiss emoji: - economic abstraction, - UX benefits, Then it cuts off at 1:00:04 right before Hasu describes his secret project! Total cliff hanger. https://t.co/mPdJfMTVsC | 2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes | |
| 1298243075295281157 2020-08-25 05:57:23 -0700 <bneiluj> Tim Roughgarden @algo_class will work on EIP 1559. Mindblowing 🤯 | 1 replies 3 retweets 16 likes | |
| 1298319129493921792 2020-08-25 10:59:36 -0700 <followrene> 6/ Deep gratitude to the @ethereum community for making @CeloOrg possible! 🙏 Looking forward to more collaboration e.g. on things like EIP-1559 https://t.co/32CKZSlKUC | 1 replies 0 retweets 10 likes | |
| 1298322043876921344 2020-08-25 11:11:11 -0700 <hausbauss> @JackCarver420 @ReedWommack @CelsiusNetwork Not necessarily. ETH2 along with the adoption of EIP 1559 will likely make the the inflation of ethereum formally negative. (ie there are actually *less* coins in circulation year over year). The interest they have is based on the composability of the protocol. | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1298342401723990016 2020-08-25 12:32:05 -0700 <evan_van_ness> #MuchClicked * @hasufl YAM = Nakamoto Scheme * @benjaminion_xyz what's new in eth2 * @golemproject picks @zksync * @synthetix_io futures primer * @EF_ESP beyond grants * @MicahZoltu eip1559 and 51% attacks * @d24nOrg eip1559 study by @algo_class * @VitalikButerin chain validation | 1 replies 13 retweets 40 likes | |
| 1298538680328519681 2020-08-26 01:32:01 -0700 <EnsBot> eip-1559.eth was just registered for 1 year(s) at a cost of 0.01 ETH https://t.co/tvGzvmSik2 | 0 replies 1 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1298596656708026368 2020-08-26 05:22:24 -0700 <Odinalldaddy> @1e9petrichor @hodlonaut I belive eth will appreciate. It has huge nettwork effect, way beyond bitcoin's now. Everything is buildt on or with ethereum. It has "unlimited" supply, but might have a better economic incentive for node opperators in the Future. Specially when EIP1559 gets integrated. | 2 replies 1 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1298615009371516929 2020-08-26 06:35:19 -0700 <TeslaRobotic> @eip1559 @DirtyTesla Fomo makes you do drastic things. 🤖 | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1298636007135313924 2020-08-26 07:58:46 -0700 <BrianGriffo> @eip1559 Why? | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1298638735966257153 2020-08-26 08:09:36 -0700 <BrianGriffo> @eip1559 Love ethereum technology. Bitcoin maximalist until further research. | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1298639689176379392 2020-08-26 08:13:24 -0700 <tarangkhaitan> @RyanSAdams EIP-1559 will help with 5 immensely. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1298640750951858176 2020-08-26 08:17:37 -0700 <Danny_Desert> @eip1559 There are some really cool DAOs built on top of #DeFi protocols coming soon that look AWESOME. | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1298666528586584064 2020-08-26 10:00:03 -0700 <bitcoinPalmer> @eip1559 @nanexcool Very | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1298666584291061761 2020-08-26 10:00:16 -0700 <ssSuttonSss> @eip1559 @nanexcool Get rich or dai tryin confidence | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1298666744400293888 2020-08-26 10:00:54 -0700 <nanexcool> @eip1559 I just listed my top 3 bags. That's my level of commitment. | 2 replies 1 retweets 25 likes | |
| 1298668882136309762 2020-08-26 10:09:24 -0700 <2JohnGodden> @eip1559 @nanexcool certain | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1298728750687891458 2020-08-26 14:07:18 -0700 <BitsellX> The highly anticipated Ethereum (ETH) improvement proposal (EIP) 1559, which includes things like an automatic token burn mechanism for... Read More 👉 https://t.co/xYPH4r2B2a #BitcoinPrice #BitcoinTrader #BuyBitcoin #CryptoCurrencyExchange #EthereumNews | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1298731297230086144 2020-08-26 14:17:25 -0700 <Whyrusleeping> The Network Base Fee (EIP-1559) code in Filecoin appears to be doing its job! We got several spikes during congestion, with *very* little delay in messages making it into the chain (Need to record some stats on message wait times). https://t.co/x9j87V992B | 2 replies 20 retweets 95 likes | |
| 1298742636732440577 2020-08-26 15:02:28 -0700 <realLedgerwatch> @iamDCinvestor @AFDudley0 I can totally see why this sounds like an attack, but I am sure it was not meant to be, sorry. My suspicion is that the main challenge with EIP-1559 has not been made clear yet. I won't try to write it in tweets, because I'd be here all night, but it needs to be discussed | 1 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1298745135912677377 2020-08-26 15:12:24 -0700 <realLedgerwatch> @iamDCinvestor @AFDudley0 Not an existential problem, but an operational challenge. As it stands, Ethereum has a very low "change bandwidth" for various reason. EIP-1559 is easily the biggest change, so it will either take a lot of time to "get through", or the bandwidth needs to be increased | 2 replies 1 retweets 6 likes | |
| 1298757183820029952 2020-08-26 16:00:17 -0700 <TimBeiko> @realLedgerwatch @iamDCinvestor @AFDudley0 And whether people are willing to give it with an uncertain outcome! If EIP-1559 had a major flaw or just "not enough consensus" to make it on mainnet, will people be okay donating? | 1 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1298771414141423616 2020-08-26 16:56:49 -0700 <VitalikButerin> In case you missed it: recent writing on fee market reform (EIP 1559) * My FAQ: https://t.co/E9JvIUkazS * @MicahZoltu on safety: https://t.co/uNOEqSDNxV * @bluepintail on fairness: https://t.co/bJYJSR1b0o Oh and it seems to be working great on filecoin: https://t.co/sgWLPF1VXg | 20 replies 103 retweets 429 likes | |
| 1298777271122059270 2020-08-26 17:20:06 -0700 <CoffeeTimesTW> Vitalik Buterin のEIP1559に関するFAQ https://t.co/8OMs1oM4ch | 1 replies 1 retweets 9 likes | |
| 1298780415315062784 2020-08-26 17:32:35 -0700 <iamDCinvestor> @AFDudley0 @bvaivoda Rick, I wasn't talking to you in my initial thread, nor are you the PM of the entire EIP-1559 effort AFAIK. I'm offering to help get folks mobilized to contribute more money. Maybe "my $10K" wouldn't mean anything to you. What it if were paired with a bunch of other donations? | 2 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1298781521663291393 2020-08-26 17:36:59 -0700 <AFDudley0> Alexey is almost always in a better mood than I am. 😂 I'm not going to make any doom and gloom predictions about EIP-1559, just please understand it's a really difficult thing to do safely. We can spend x now, or we can spend multiples of x later. | 0 replies 1 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1298783066345951232 2020-08-26 17:43:07 -0700 <ChainNewscom> 【EthHub 联合创始人称以太坊改进提案 EIP-1559 可能会在 6 到 12 个月内推出】链闻消息，EthHub 联合创始人 Anthony Sassano 撰文称，「以太坊改进提案 EIP-1559 可能会在未来 …… https://t.co/KXplmp15w6 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1298784185935519746 2020-08-26 17:47:34 -0700 <AFDudley0> @iamDCinvestor @bvaivoda This is exactly what happened, over a year ago. As far as I was concerned EIP-1559 was dead because people didn't want to pay for it. Hopefully, the economic analysis that's being funded will result in a cogent feature set and the will to fund & deploy it. Time will tell. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1298784729777311744 2020-08-26 17:49:44 -0700 <AFDudley0> @iamDCinvestor @bvaivoda People need to understand how complex EIP-1559 is and extremely difficult it is to reason about its phased release nature. It's not just a flip a switch deployment, it's a series of hard forks, with the goal changing some of the core economic properties of the system. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1298792335866834944 2020-08-26 18:19:57 -0700 <imrane> Fantastic read on the fairness of EIP-1559 by @bluepintail 👏👏 https://t.co/Kx4STjBaQm | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1298792733562138624 2020-08-26 18:21:32 -0700 <arctechinc> @eip1559 @WholeMarsBlog @DriveTeslaca You have to be a resident of the US to pickup in the US. So cannot do that as a Canadian. | 2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1298794480342978561 2020-08-26 18:28:29 -0700 <DriveTeslaca> @arctechinc @eip1559 @WholeMarsBlog What he said 👆🙂 | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1298795555813052418 2020-08-26 18:32:45 -0700 <RyanSAdams> Just want two things in life. 1. World peace 2. EIP1559 | 15 replies 20 retweets 243 likes | |
| 1298796868969697281 2020-08-26 18:37:58 -0700 <ethGarin> Good information on EIP 1559 | 1 replies 0 retweets 9 likes | |
| 1298816259300024321 2020-08-26 19:55:01 -0700 <Cointelegraph> A long awaited change to Ethereum’s fee structure is closer than ever following successful EIP 1559 tests on Filecoin https://t.co/evw2fFmGeJ | 0 replies 19 retweets 70 likes | |
| 1298817087926702080 2020-08-26 19:58:19 -0700 <sassal0x> @VitalikButerin @MicahZoltu @bluepintail I also put together a piece with a bunch of info on EIP-1559 a couple of days ago :) https://t.co/9IMsIxQYlh | 1 replies 3 retweets 25 likes | |
| 1298818022069751808 2020-08-26 20:02:01 -0700 <eudyzerpa> A long awaited change to Ethereum’s fee structure is closer than ever following successful EIP 1559 tests on Filecoin https://t.co/F1GpE1XwNR#crypto #cryptocurrency #fintech #finance | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1298818428606787584 2020-08-26 20:03:38 -0700 <AdelElmessiry> @sassal0x @VitalikButerin @MicahZoltu @bluepintail I think EIP 1559 is the best way to achieve network Inflation equilibrium. | 0 replies 0 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1298827113244635136 2020-08-26 20:38:09 -0700 <webnowcompany> FIlecoin has been testing EIP 1559 which aims to tackle high network fees on Ethereum....Read more: https://t.co/PzKCiLxwR7 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1298836994710151168 2020-08-26 21:17:25 -0700 <ethGarin> - ETH is used to pay for gas - ETH is used as trustless collateral in the decentralized finance ecosystem - ETH issuance will be greatly reduced with staking - ETH issuance will be reduced even more with an improvement called EIP 1559 ...ect https://t.co/XD0QliCVyN | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1298854637726990338 2020-08-26 22:27:31 -0700 <newscryptobtc> Filecoin tests pave way for Ethereum fee restructure FIlecoin has been testing EIP 1559 which aims to tackle high network fees on Ethereum. A long anticipated Ethereum Improvement Proposal (EIP) which aims to tackle high network fees is currently being… https://t.co/17179DbthU https://t.co/HTtJzDw8si | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1298878209833005056 2020-08-27 00:01:11 -0700 <PaoloRebuffo> @realLedgerwatch @TimBeiko @iamDCinvestor @AFDudley0 How much to fund properly eip-1559 R&D per month? Glad to offer one. | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1298884068764004352 2020-08-27 00:24:28 -0700 <cryptotothemoo1> A long awaited change to Ethereum’s fee structure is closer than ever following successful EIP 1559 tests on Filecoin https://t.co/65fS6RnVqP | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1298888505846685697 2020-08-27 00:42:06 -0700 <CoffeeTimesTW> EIP1559のセキュリティについての考察 https://t.co/mEbYQeJLNt | 0 replies 2 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1298908802654191616 2020-08-27 02:02:45 -0700 <twigwam> Filecoin tests pave way for #Ethereum fee restructure 💾 #FIlecoin has been testing EIP 1559 which aims to tackle high network fees on Ethereum.🔔 #FIL #ETH #EIP1559 https://t.co/j4lqsLoW7h | 0 replies 1 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1298922542212644865 2020-08-27 02:57:21 -0700 <Nkosi_Dlungwane> @VusiThembekwayo Eth2.0 will offer both, now I just hope EIP 1559 actually follows to burn eth during transactions. That’s scalability which will result in the burning of eth to cut its circulating supply while also proving a good ROI. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1298924006813376517 2020-08-27 03:03:10 -0700 <ForkLog> Направленное на снижение комиссий в сети Ethereum предложение EIP 1559 проходит испытание в сети Filecoin. Об этом сообщил разработчик проекта @Whyrusleeping. https://t.co/3FWWBkgbnP | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1298927645422477312 2020-08-27 03:17:38 -0700 <ZurabPoletin> Направленное на снижение комиссий в сети Ethereum предложение EIP 1559 проходит испытание в сети Filecoin. Об этом сообщил разработчик проекта Джероми Джонсон. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1298933601241894912 2020-08-27 03:41:18 -0700 <jtrnkabr> EIP 1559 FAQ - HackMD https://t.co/Rj5h6OiPuM | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1298938484036710400 2020-08-27 04:00:42 -0700 <Crypto_n_derivs> ETH fee market is broken We need #EIP1559 or equivalent I thought it's just number go up + fancy techy gibberish It's not It's number go up and efficient gas limit flexibility | 1 replies 1 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1298964528449781760 2020-08-27 05:44:11 -0700 <Kha_Hachi> @eip1559 @WholeMarsBlog @DriveTeslaca @arctechinc Years ago yes, when 1$ CA was 0.98$US | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1298965815417614336 2020-08-27 05:49:18 -0700 <BTCstJournal> Filecoin Looks to Mitigate Ethereum Fees with EIP-1559 https://t.co/Jcadook7Je #bitcoin https://t.co/bU9BfIM7Dq | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1298966259338375169 2020-08-27 05:51:04 -0700 <roccodallas> #Altcoins #EIP1559 #ETH #Ethereum Filecoin Looks to Mitigate Ethereum Fees with EIP-1559 https://t.co/xi8MONgptb https://t.co/e99atFqXGH | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1298967891652620289 2020-08-27 05:57:33 -0700 <BloxliveTV> Greg from @DappUniversity believes that EIP-1559 and @Ethereum 2.0 could make $ETH scarcer over time. Learn more about his #blockchain developer perspective in this video 👇 https://t.co/aYwbwIAFK8 https://t.co/nps77xqvQR | 0 replies 1 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1298968054571896838 2020-08-27 05:58:12 -0700 <xbtmoney> Filecoin Looks to Mitigate Ethereum Fees with EIP-1559 https://t.co/Wn8BML5SWY #XBT #BTC #Bitcoin | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1298969157652885510 2020-08-27 06:02:35 -0700 <DONUT_ethtrader> 🤖 🗣 Ethereum fee market reform: EIP-1559 as a question of fairness 👉 https://t.co/ITyBvqtOrU 👈 $DONUT 🍩 $ETH ⟠ #DeFi 🌾 https://t.co/U7wUUrPkcS | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1298972967075024896 2020-08-27 06:17:43 -0700 <worlds24com> FIlecoin has been testing EIP 1559 which aims to tackle high network fees on Ethereum. A long anticipated Ethereum Improvement Proposal (EIP) which aims to tackle high network fees is currently being tested on the Filecoin network. https://t.co/nQGkzQGlg7 https://t.co/vLJ0hhRD7a | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1298975895986876416 2020-08-27 06:29:22 -0700 <meeseeking> EIP-1559 needs a hero to own it, manage it, & make it happen. It started as an #Ethereum idea & now is live on multiple other chains, more to come It's v powerful & a major upgrade. Are you the hero we need? If you're not, do you know her? We're looking for a hero. #Ethereum | 2 replies 22 retweets 71 likes | |
| 1298982916769251329 2020-08-27 06:57:15 -0700 <cryptoicamis> FIlecoin has been testing EIP 1559 which aims to tackle high network fees on Ethereum. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1298984013479071745 2020-08-27 07:01:37 -0700 <btc_manager> #Filecoin Looks to Mitigate #Ethereum Fees with EIP-1559 BY: Aisshwarya Tiwari https://t.co/G7SlqvToM2 #EIP1559 #ETH #EthereumGas https://t.co/nBoqvzLfGt | 0 replies 3 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1298986028473044992 2020-08-27 07:09:37 -0700 <BandhulBansal> @Filecoin has been testing EIP 1559- aims to tackle high network #fees on @ethereum. Check out the link for more information. https://t.co/UhdXuDv4BX #cryptonews #eth #Ethereum #Crypto https://t.co/q0dSFZ6g7U | 1 replies 4 retweets 8 likes | |
| 1298999056589443078 2020-08-27 08:01:23 -0700 <litocoen> @cyber_hokie @davidiach @meeseeking @rasliche @AlexanderFisher @econoar I think the closest to "owning" it is @TimBeiko @sassal0x did a great post on the state of EIP-1559 I would love to see more coordination on this initiative. Imo it should be no#1 area of focus after ETH2 and L1 solutions https://t.co/cTCLaEazVZ | 0 replies 0 retweets 8 likes | |
| 1299007247658319872 2020-08-27 08:33:56 -0700 <TimBeiko> EIP-1559 Implementers' Call #4 is tomorrow, 15:00 UTC 🔥 Agenda: https://t.co/3Pc24p0ihY The call won't be livestreamed, but uploaded to Youtube afterwards. I'll also post a TL;DR on twitter and we'll have a full transcript available in the day or two after the call 😁 | 0 replies 17 retweets 53 likes | |
| 1299009705553981441 2020-08-27 08:43:42 -0700 <HodlingBitcoin> Filecoin Is Currently Testing EIP 1559, A Proposal to Restructure Ethereum’s Gas Fees https://t.co/zxuwN32uAa | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1299010117720051713 2020-08-27 08:45:21 -0700 <bitcoinsguide> . #Filecoin Is Currently Testing #EIP1559, A Proposal to Restructure #Ethereum’s Gas Fees https://t.co/GvjYLqNiTm | 0 replies 1 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1299010523774713856 2020-08-27 08:46:57 -0700 <on_ethereum> Updated EIP 1559 FAQ by Vitalik Buterin https://t.co/A0NdJXcIHV via @on_ethereum | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1299014047879356419 2020-08-27 09:00:58 -0700 <CryptoAbsorbed> Filecoin Is Currently Testing EIP 1559, A Proposal to Restructure Ethereum’s Gas Fees https://t.co/Pfv5x9S2Jm | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1299028854288384002 2020-08-27 09:59:48 -0700 <cryptow1re> reddit 🤖: Filecoin Is Currently Testing EIP 1559, A Proposal to Restructure Ethereum's Gas Fees https://t.co/cNXIKZCjl8 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1299030077217419264 2020-08-27 10:04:39 -0700 <T_Nenninger> Nope😜 1. Eth 2.0 2. EIP1559 World peace comes naturally as a consequence of step 1 & 2🤗 | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1299030823572733954 2020-08-27 10:07:37 -0700 <veliko_test3> Filecoin Is Currently Testing EIP 1559, A Proposal to Restructure Ethereum's Gas Fees https://t.co/hwYg4vIkHW | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1299036213609771008 2020-08-27 10:29:02 -0700 <Samaren27953508> @VitalikButerin @MicahZoltu @bluepintail "EIP-1559" when will it come in ethereum ?? | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1299042086751219713 2020-08-27 10:52:23 -0700 <IvanOnTech> Ethereum might have negative inflation soon... Read about EIP1559 🔥🔥 (ETH below $400 is crazy) | 27 replies 40 retweets 408 likes | |
| 1299042481045209088 2020-08-27 10:53:57 -0700 <ZacharyDash> @IvanOnTech I am probably speaking out of context here ^ I am a fan of EIP1559. Would dis-inflationary be more accurate? Like Bitcoin? | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1299045106524344320 2020-08-27 11:04:23 -0700 <humoalex> @IvanOnTech @TrueCrypto28 Was EIP1559 accepted? Or Escalator? Its a doubt friend | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1299057148433797121 2020-08-27 11:52:14 -0700 <SantoshLonkar13> @RyanSAdams Please do EIP 1559 as soon as possible | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1299060663126568960 2020-08-27 12:06:12 -0700 <OneWayToAll> Filecoin Looks to Mitigate Ethereum Fees with EIP-1559 #Ethereum via https://t.co/0ydu6yLH1s https://t.co/S232WgqZqN | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1299061119651328009 2020-08-27 12:08:00 -0700 <EthereumNetw> EIP 1559 appears to be doing its job on an ongoing test on the #Ethereum network. https://t.co/WF9xWzunre | 0 replies 7 retweets 37 likes | |
| 1299075973489586179 2020-08-27 13:07:02 -0700 <Stepan_Kremzer> @eip1559 @WholeMarsBlog @elonmusk Yes, he's moving his business outta there and stopped supporting Democrats. | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1299118566529216512 2020-08-27 15:56:17 -0700 <smpalladino> In addition, EIP1559 allows for burning fees instead of giving them to miners. This will cause a reduction of the ETH supply, making it deflationary. | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1299128766908825600 2020-08-27 16:36:49 -0700 <SawyerMerritt> @eip1559 I’ll be driving a Tesla soon enough | 1 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1299138340441083904 2020-08-27 17:14:51 -0700 <jonpq21> @Stepan_Kremzer @eip1559 @WholeMarsBlog @elonmusk That was largely a bluff. They may move their HQ in the long term, but that’s several years down the line and who knows what the situation will be at that point. | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1299172794186387458 2020-08-27 19:31:46 -0700 <Mandeep71565733> Now due to the increased fee problem, Ethereum network has taken the support of Filecoin to help with the restructuring of Ethereum fee and bring EIP 1559. #cryptonews #eth #Ethereum #crypto | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1299199511076564993 2020-08-27 21:17:56 -0700 <etherealcapital> Ethereum fee market reform: EIP-1559 as a question of fairness by @bluepintail https://t.co/d5sje5H5qJ | 0 replies 1 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1299205582784610306 2020-08-27 21:42:03 -0700 <least_nathan> 3. @hasufl suggests EIP-1559 + indefinite issuance can successfully reinforce each other; seems to gloss over how the supply will evolve moving forward. Is this assuming some new issuance policy that doesn't exist yet? (How do we know issuance - BASE_FEE will be a good balance?) | 2 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1299205585494179840 2020-08-27 21:42:04 -0700 <least_nathan> Some references of Zcash-specific efforts: - A cousin proposal to EIP-1559: https://t.co/0kKr1PbG71 - ZIP Draft for User-Defined Assets: https://t.co/e6kh2Jsg3r - A design for a Cosmos sidechain which may support multiple assets: https://t.co/piBSkYPpsO | 2 replies 2 retweets 10 likes | |
| 1299209913206333441 2020-08-27 21:59:16 -0700 <TarunKu22779043> Vitalik Buterin expressed his concern regarding the increased Ethereum fee. Now due to the increased fee problem, Ethereum network has taken the support of Filecoin to help with the restructuring of Ethereum fee and bring EIP 1559. #cryptonews #eth #ethereum #crypto | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1299220040219320323 2020-08-27 22:39:30 -0700 <MosaicNFTArt> @eip1559 @zapper_fi @hiFramework @VENTURE_DAO @TheLAOOfficial @coinfund_io @coingecko @ZeePrimeCap @MichaelDunwort1 @kaiynne @nanexcool @sassal0x @Melt_Dem @stefanobernardi yes, that would be interesting... | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1299224731032444928 2020-08-27 22:58:08 -0700 <mrabino1> @ETH_Charly @mkalinin2 @APompliano Economically i don't think we will or should "set" it... rather, it will happen in due course with eth2 and eip 1559... in doing the above, the S2F economics go off the chart. | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1299278350461079552 2020-08-28 02:31:12 -0700 <CHalexov2016> Yeah 5 milion $eth #ethereum lock in #defi and 70-80% +/- will be lock in ETH2 phase 0 staking that coming November 2020! DYOR! Btw $eth have over 1 milion transaction a day! EIP 1559 gas burn also coming! 2020/2021 is @ethereum year! 🪐🕷🪐 Hope you stock few #Ethereum 🪐🕷🪐 | 1 replies 1 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1299279144962777088 2020-08-28 02:34:22 -0700 <CletusCrypto> @dnkta @sassal0x + fee burning in EIP1559... 😱 | 0 replies 0 retweets 7 likes | |
| 1299295619379425280 2020-08-28 03:39:50 -0700 <dianduidian> 【点对点快讯】Filecoin研发工程师：在网络测试中，EIP 1559代码“似乎正在发挥作用” https://t.co/Bn0sjjXc44 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1299303000175857665 2020-08-28 04:09:09 -0700 <stanly_jn> @dmihal Stablecoins are mostly the largest consumers of gas, IMHO removing eth from gas can diminish demand . Also I wonder how this will work with eip1559. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1299306399952928770 2020-08-28 04:22:40 -0700 <davidiach> @nanexcool @JohnLilic @eip1559 At the rate $YFI is getting repriced, it will soon end up being your no 1 bag. | 0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1299320576121516032 2020-08-28 05:19:00 -0700 <evan_van_ness> Fact: eip1559-style fee burn is going to happen in Eth2 and will likely make $ETH have negative issuance But don't take my word for it, check it out in the eth2 spec: https://t.co/6AYHuEIeBX | 3 replies 27 retweets 125 likes | |
| 1299337121069580288 2020-08-28 06:24:44 -0700 <0xTycoon> @evan_van_ness Are you sure? There doesn't seem to be "base fee" mentioned in there, only "base reward" - I don't think EIP1559 is in the ETH 2.0 spec yet 😓 | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1299354206415982594 2020-08-28 07:32:38 -0700 <ioTalent_> @RyanSAdams @AlexSaundersAU @eip1559 | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1299361093052018689 2020-08-28 08:00:00 -0700 <MonetSupply> could there be anything more poetic than a deflationary governance token (@SpaghettiMoney $PASTA) funding public good research on fee burning (EIP-1559)? h/t @gitcoin https://t.co/W68m9ORgQP | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1299363496879030272 2020-08-28 08:09:33 -0700 <terencechain> @CurrencyTycoon @evan_van_ness It's in the `decrease_balance` for `proposer_index`. The `gasprice` of the `shard_state` is equivalent to the basefee in EIP 1559 `compute_updated_gasprice` updates the `gasprice` (basefee) based on eip1559 formulas | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1299374068022476801 2020-08-28 08:51:33 -0700 <vgman94> @eip1559 SAAAAAME! Goddamn. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1299403282004111361 2020-08-28 10:47:38 -0700 <TimBeiko> The way EIP-1559 currently works is that it introduces a transition period of 800 000 blocks where both legacy and 1559-style transactions are valid. Block size doubles with 1559, so at first, the block space is split 50% between each type of transaction. | 1 replies 1 retweets 10 likes | |
| 1299409092881125377 2020-08-28 11:10:44 -0700 <cryptow1re> #ethtrader 🤖: EIP-1559 Status Update - Tim Beiko https://t.co/kdcZPmKPBE | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1299409339434889217 2020-08-28 11:11:43 -0700 <cryptow1re> reddit 🤖: EIP-1559 Status Update - Tim Beiko https://t.co/ThA9XQQH7g | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1299411505750986757 2020-08-28 11:20:19 -0700 <CHalexov2016> BTW can you imagine... EIP-1559 $eth gas burn + #defi $eth lock + #pos aka #staking lock $eth ... will there be maybe 5-10% #ethereum left in real circulation supply!? All this coming 2020/2021 🪐🕷🪐 its will be FOMO @ethereum @Consensys | 0 replies 0 retweets 10 likes | |
| 1299419462656024577 2020-08-28 11:51:56 -0700 <CHalexov2016> EIP 1559 Implementers' Call #4 https://t.co/nWPzvyNdjk via @YouTube | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1299420692606316545 2020-08-28 11:56:49 -0700 <on_ethereum> EIP 1559 Implementers’ Call #4 via @on_ethereum | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1299422790865608704 2020-08-28 12:05:10 -0700 <Hex_Capital> @TimBeiko What if the clients continued sorting the txpool by gasprice & timeReceived, but legacy transactions are sorted with some penalty, e.g. gasprice/2.0. Creates an incentive to switch to EIP 1559 that's not as confusing as allocating X% block space to each. @AFDudley0 | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1299425302582644736 2020-08-28 12:15:08 -0700 <LUKACACIC> EIP 1559 with phase 1 #eth2 early 2021 would be cool. Let's do it devethereans! Burn them $ETH diamonds! 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 | 1 replies 4 retweets 65 likes | |
| 1299434200685252613 2020-08-28 12:50:30 -0700 <OtherBright> This is really going fast 🚀! ETH locked in DeFi 🔐 + ETH in staking ✅ (+ hopefully EIP 1559 🔥) = Ethereum health/immune system ⚕️ oc higher is better 😃 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1299446743994515456 2020-08-28 13:40:20 -0700 <Hex_Capital> @AFDudley0 @TimBeiko Why do we need to distinguish between 1559 and legacy txs anyway? Starting with EIP1559, can't we just say legacy txs are interpreted as gasPrice = FEECAP and GAS_PREMIUM = FEECAP - BASE_FEE and then treat them the same as EIP1559 txs? | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1299449248761536512 2020-08-28 13:50:18 -0700 <TimBeiko> Unfortunately, because of EIP-1559 and other commitments, I've had to step back from doing EntEth updates for the newsletter. Spot is open for anyone who wants to dig into it 🕵🏻♂️ With INX, Baseline and the Quorum <> ConsenSys deal, there's a _lot_ here! Ping @spencernoon 👀 | 2 replies 2 retweets 11 likes | |
| 1299471410897788929 2020-08-28 15:18:22 -0700 <WhizWynn> @riddle_me_raven @Instadapp @AaveAave Until gas fees come down...via eip1559 or eth2.0 You have to sit out, suck it up, tx larger amounts so the fee is relatively smaller, or use a yield roll up/aggregator like YFI depending on what your goal is | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1299499697208524811 2020-08-28 17:10:46 -0700 <dge_dy> @eip1559 @coinbase spot on question, mate! | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1299499886220423168 2020-08-28 17:11:31 -0700 <MikeAbundo> @eip1559 Which became PayPal. 😊 | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1299502099504549891 2020-08-28 17:20:18 -0700 <dge_dy> @eip1559 @coinbase but actually, the post on medium informs that the fees still exist but they may be deducted directly on usdc for example. So, gasless means there's no need to have eth to pay for gas... But 'gas' will have be paid anyway... 🙂 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1299540702427144192 2020-08-28 19:53:42 -0700 <Tauras159> Can we get yETH Vault by @iearnfinance , EIP1559 and $ETH v2 by Christmas please? If yes, #ETH to the moon. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1299579025279475712 2020-08-28 22:25:59 -0700 <Tauras159> @Substreight Plus EIP 1559 -> Few understand. | 0 replies 0 retweets 10 likes | |
| 1299626959178289152 2020-08-29 01:36:27 -0700 <das_grasshopper> @harrycanuck @antiprosynth EIP1559 looks good in FileCoin. Negative issuance coming in ETH. This is going to get super interesting. Oh and TMobile making a play into DeFi providing oracle feeds for Chainlink! #bullrun #Cryptowinterisover | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1299635711071719424 2020-08-29 02:11:14 -0700 <FigoETH> @Inchhighprivate @ThinkingUSD ETH value proposition as SoV: - more scarce with EIP 1559, DeFi lockup, Staking in PoS (3-5 %) - Issuance reduced drastically with PoS (around 2025 0,5 % compared to 0,9 % BTC) - regulatory clarity since considered commodity by CTFC (along with BTC) - reserve asset of Ethereum | 1 replies 3 retweets 17 likes | |
| 1299738709424664579 2020-08-29 09:00:30 -0700 <defivc> EIP-1559 Status Update - Tim Beiko https://t.co/7k1O24cyVl #ethereum #DeFi | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1299740970376925184 2020-08-29 09:09:30 -0700 <poojaranjan19> EIP-1559 Implementers' Call 4 Notes https://t.co/uVNaAriL3C #EIP1559 @ethereum @EthCatHerders | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1299743555020300288 2020-08-29 09:19:46 -0700 <multibagger777> @eip1559 @WholeMarsBlog That'll be so funny though | 0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1299750503786528770 2020-08-29 09:47:22 -0700 <MooreJared0> $ETH is the most under-valued digital commodity in the world right now. EIP-1559, presale and DeFi lockups, ETH 2.0 BeaconChain launch all will contribute to an eventual ETH shortage. I suspect ETH/USD will surpass the value of BTC/USD. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1299915123910496258 2020-08-29 20:41:31 -0700 <nanexcool> @eip1559 Yes! | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1299944080571428871 2020-08-29 22:36:35 -0700 <chubchubkun> EIP1559はよしておくれ！唐突なGas Stormは勘弁して欲しいのである。 | 0 replies 0 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1299966327063412736 2020-08-30 00:04:59 -0700 <FulgorSedano6> Ethereum is undervalued. EIP 1559 + PoS + ETH yVaults will send ETH to $1,200 | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1300002011874721793 2020-08-30 02:26:47 -0700 <0xVoyta> Current daily tx fees ~8k $ETH, annualized this is ~2.9M $ETH or 2.5% of total supply (P/E ~40 ignoring further increases which are very likely. P/E already comparable to top yield dog $YFI but with lower risk). So I'd say pump is coming when PoS / EIP-1559 are visibly closer | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1300046514191032320 2020-08-30 05:23:37 -0700 <RyanSAdams> @ledgerstatus @loomdart Kind of, but not quite. Yes it is price to sales, but no you do not necessarily need to run validator hardware to receive the benefit from transaction fees that are burnt via EIP1559...just have to own ETH in Eth2 Additionally this does not include issuance rewards | 1 replies 1 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1300047046603309059 2020-08-30 05:25:44 -0700 <thelionshire> @RyanSAdams Need the eip 1559 and things will really take off 🚀! | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1300072474705620993 2020-08-30 07:06:46 -0700 <GrowthDefi> If you haven't read @bluepintail Medium articles you're missing out on learning about @UniswapProtocol AMM and EIP-1559. https://t.co/ee3J1kPUdd | 0 replies 3 retweets 14 likes | |
| 1300112502793990144 2020-08-30 09:45:50 -0700 <MassiveKaizen> @eip1559 Bruh that's like my portfolio 😂 | 0 replies 1 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1300119002979676161 2020-08-30 10:11:40 -0700 <nanexcool> @OurielOhayon Well, Uniswap fees go to liquidity providers. And hopefully with EIP-1559 the bulk of the miner fees will be burned, making ETH scarcer. | 1 replies 0 retweets 7 likes | |
| 1300178227915350019 2020-08-30 14:07:00 -0700 <SonnyGarza9> @eip1559 @WholeMarsBlog @GerberKawasaki @cburniske @DirtyTesla @nanexcool @elonmusk @bneiluj @SawyerMerritt Where's Pope | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1300271832717811715 2020-08-30 20:18:57 -0700 <DeFiStandard> @JBcryptS @GetOutOftheMind @Quantstamp Si, el gas está terrible estos días. Necesitamos urgentemente que se apruebe el eip-1559 y que se pongan en marcha ya soluciones de tipo layer 2. Hay varias de ellas, con token, prometedoras. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1300286885982621696 2020-08-30 21:18:46 -0700 <CounihanShannon> @eip1559 @DirtyTesla Whatssss in the ssssackiessss preciousssss???? | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1300298212150919173 2020-08-30 22:03:46 -0700 <tarangkhaitan> @sassal0x @iearnfinance This along with EIP-1559 will like rocket fuel for ETH price. | 0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1300309579255996421 2020-08-30 22:48:56 -0700 <cryptoandfire> I don't know how people are still interacting with such high gwei price. Works only for people with big capital. Get the EIP 1559 going before its too late. 💥Follow @cryptoandfire 🎊Link in… https://t.co/G32pQxj58n | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1300374297676931072 2020-08-31 03:06:07 -0700 <0xTycoon> EIP1559 halp! | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1300450849387315201 2020-08-31 08:10:18 -0700 <scott_lew_is> @koeppelmann @haydenzadams right now yes, maybe in the future. (depending on topology of blockchain usage. but whether it is a rent-seeking entity is still up in the air. getting eip-1559 to distribute fees to all holders, rather than just stakers, is key to keeping it not rent-seeking in the long run./ | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1300454547790258176 2020-08-31 08:25:00 -0700 <ioTalent_> @haydenzadams @UniswapProtocol @coinbase @eip1559 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1300480998233309185 2020-08-31 10:10:06 -0700 <tbr90> If you have a low time preference and I looking for a lower risk opportunity than Degen DeFi, you can’t sleep on $ETH. EIP-1559 will be revolutionary to ETHs value accrual | 5 replies 16 retweets 111 likes | |
| 1300484744510148614 2020-08-31 10:24:59 -0700 <PaoloRebuffo> Eip-1559 need probably 6 to 12 months to be implemented, so I strongly advocate for something simpler. Burn at leat 30% of the transaction fee, so that stakeholders that don't want or cannot partecipate to the #DeFi games (or gambling?) have some restoration. | 0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1300492287286288385 2020-08-31 10:54:57 -0700 <tarikbell> @tbr90 What are your thoughts on the competing interests of L2 scaling and EIP 1559? Seems like L2 integrations are ramping up...do you know latest timeline for 1559? I’ve noticed the community is hyped about L2s and the EIP but imo the former largely blunts the impact of the latter | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1300506571441610752 2020-08-31 11:51:43 -0700 <niran> @scott_lew_is @koeppelmann @haydenzadams The argument for #2, which I also believe, is that it legitimizes rent seeking in the community, so it makes it easier to gain support. Everyone hates high Ethereum fees now, but there would be a huge debate about keeping fees high if EIP 1559 was already in place. | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1300509928046690304 2020-08-31 12:05:03 -0700 <scott_lew_is> @niran @koeppelmann @haydenzadams so eip-1559 gives the minority of nay-sayers the best chance to win. and im in the nay-saying majority on rent-seeking! | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1300510514729152514 2020-08-31 12:07:23 -0700 <niran> @scott_lew_is @koeppelmann @haydenzadams I support EIP 1559, but I think we're going to lose the battle against a culture of rent seeking unless Vitalik intervenes. Regardless, interesting times! | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1300510960403316736 2020-08-31 12:09:09 -0700 <scott_lew_is> @niran @koeppelmann @haydenzadams we'll see. i already see the most active community members diversifying out all ETH... to ETH + high quality project tokens. the people are turning into net gas payers (if EIP 1559 was in place). it will be hard to form a consensus to change ethereum vision against their interest | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1300514893276295173 2020-08-31 12:24:47 -0700 <RealAllenHena> EIP-1559 + ETH2 staking + yETH vaults... Tell me again about your Ethereum inflation and demand concerns? https://t.co/zxIEdkCVcl | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1300524488749125632 2020-08-31 13:02:55 -0700 <krugman25> @iamDCinvestor Can't wait to get that EIP-1559 up and running so we can be burning some of that $ETH supply 🙂 | 1 replies 0 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1300530083699064836 2020-08-31 13:25:09 -0700 <2mizeen> @lemiscate @antiprosynth One eip 1559 is added then that's the end | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1300549286384381952 2020-08-31 14:41:27 -0700 <joshuahjohnson> There are two sides to the $ETH market. How will upcoming developments affect price? Demand side: yETH vault, ETH2.0 staking, DeFi collatoral Supply side: block reward - EIP1559 In an inelastic market the demand side takes supply off the market. Now add in reflexivity. 📈📈 | 0 replies 1 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1300555300781453312 2020-08-31 15:05:21 -0700 <ethwriter_> EIP-1559 holds the promise of: 1) drastically improving UX around ETH gas prices 2) making ETH a deflationary asset @OFernau walks you through why this proposal is such a big deal for #Ethereum going forward 🤯 https://t.co/dXrf7tpQoX | 0 replies 3 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1300559187957747715 2020-08-31 15:20:48 -0700 <marcheb2> @eip1559 @JamesHoffmann3 @WholeMarsBlog Lucid makes the batteries for formula e something tesla doesn't | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1300573138434977792 2020-08-31 16:16:14 -0700 <iter_nation> @Wealth_Theory Ethereum has concrete mechanics driving the upward price speculation that are still largely overlooked by investors - ~$8b ether locked as collateral - (WIP) eth staking in the phase 0 upgrade - (WIP) EIP-1559 transaction burns These are all organic demand drivers | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1300587513086578688 2020-08-31 17:13:21 -0700 <marshiecrypto> @haydenzadams EIP 1559 is much needed to ensure the DeFi ecosystem can continue to grow. Otherwise, the network value will be captured by alternatives such as $DOT @VitalikButerin | 0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1300590753068904448 2020-08-31 17:26:13 -0700 <TheCryptoLark> 8 - Ethereum will disrupt stock markets, bond markets, real estate markets, forex markets, and derivative markets 9 - Ethereum has not one, but about a dozen layer two scaling solutions being deployed 10 - EIP 1559 will introduce fee burning making ETH potentially deflationary | 2 replies 19 retweets 89 likes | |
| 1300645609079214082 2020-08-31 21:04:12 -0700 <2mizeen> Ethereum milestones I am looking forward to before the end of the year. Launch of the yeth vault and the effect it would have. Launch of deposit contract for eth 2. The eth 2 launch itself. EIP 1559 hard fork for eth 1. The full effects won't be felt for till next year but huuge | 1 replies 1 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1300656133070356480 2020-08-31 21:46:01 -0700 <Teutonium> @LightCrypto And, assuming that ETH2.0 is just around the corner, add to this the change to PoS coupled with a heavy reduction of inflation coupled with EIP1559. | 1 replies 0 retweets 6 likes | |
| 1300660054107058176 2020-08-31 22:01:36 -0700 <begcoins> @Teutonium @LightCrypto Few understand EIP1559 | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1300660673152790533 2020-08-31 22:04:04 -0700 <begcoins> If youre bullish on $eth and you haven't read what EIP1559 is, PREPARE TO HAVE YOUR HEAD EXPLODED. @IamCryptoWolf https://t.co/M5bUtJMX8H | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1300660817289867264 2020-08-31 22:04:38 -0700 <Tetranode> @eip1559 @nanexcool @AndreCronjeTech Vitalik is yearning for an automated MakerDao... | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1300663418450395141 2020-08-31 22:14:58 -0700 <AJITKUM44392531> @VitalikButerin any update sir eip 1559 please... Minear limit cross fee set this time | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1300672249666691072 2020-08-31 22:50:04 -0700 <_jamiis> @tarikbell @tbr90 They compliment one another. EIP1559 allows for better gas pricing but also enables fee burning; miners only get block reward. L2 (essentially) increases how many transactions can fit in a block. With both implemented it’s a multiplicative effect for burning ETH/reducing supply | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1300678164125949952 2020-08-31 23:13:34 -0700 <elusivechad> @lawmaster Imagine if EIP-1559 was in... https://t.co/dQSTItyNma | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1300681386853126144 2020-08-31 23:26:22 -0700 <RyanBerckmans> Today, Ethereum generated an annual run rate of $3B in fees. At what fee level should we consider, before EIP-1559, burning some fees to benefit ETH holders? | 2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1300691285498408965 2020-09-01 00:05:42 -0700 <AFDudley0> I'm worried Ethereum won't go back to "normal". The World Computer is dead. EIP1559 isn't going to help with this. I'm not even sure getting rid of gas completely will fix this. https://t.co/AYf0oKlrbf | 22 replies 15 retweets 115 likes | |
| 1300700125690572800 2020-09-01 00:40:50 -0700 <YasarKhan89> @cz_binance @binance we are listening from long time that @maticnetwork @omise_go @Polkadot EIP1559 is the solution but where is the implementation. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1300700731696054272 2020-09-01 00:43:14 -0700 <edmundedgar> @RyanBerckmans How would you do this without EIP1559? Do you just mean something like Skinny EIP1559 or is there a simpler way? | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1300705250710560771 2020-09-01 01:01:12 -0700 <Ethprofit> @begcoins @Teutonium @LightCrypto Few understand EIP1559, but many will benefit thanks to EIP1559. $ETH | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1300708922140102657 2020-09-01 01:15:47 -0700 <Ethprofit> Imagine if EIP-1559 was implemented? This would mean so much $ETH would be burned and transaction fees would be lower too. #ETH #Ethereum #Crypto #Cryptocurrency #Blockchain https://t.co/pDRep3MTyC | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1300727836534353921 2020-09-01 02:30:57 -0700 <CHalexov2016> Soon EIP-1559 will fix it! #Ethereum | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1300746982122688513 2020-09-01 03:47:01 -0700 <Yamaoka_btc> ETHの手数料がとか今更言い出してるのは単に開発状況を知らないで書いてるだけだと思う。 とは言え現状超高いし、 この需要が続く限り改善しないし EIP1559が来たとしてもガス代が安くなると言われているが需要が落ちない限り今度は反映に時間がかかるという状況になるんじゃないかと予想してる。 | 0 replies 1 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1300755738361556998 2020-09-01 04:21:49 -0700 <PaoloRebuffo> Just made an #Ethereum tx with 500 Gwei of gas cost. @etherscan is informing me that it could take about 14 minutes. For God's sake give us #EIP1559, a precise estimate of the cost of gas is absolutely necessary. @TimBeiko @MicahZoltu @VitalikButerin | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1300763078607343626 2020-09-01 04:50:59 -0700 <CCassets> 確かにぶっ壊れてるｗｗ EIP1559も準備されつつあるし、Eth2.0はシャーディングによってこの1/100程度のfeeになる試算だし、Eth2.0でEIP1559入れればもっと安定した低feeも可能になっていく。 手は講じている。 "今"ダメだからって、"もう"ダメではない。 | 2 replies 2 retweets 18 likes | |
| 1300781571662925826 2020-09-01 06:04:28 -0700 <PhABCD> If EIP-1559 was live, the current ETH daily supply change would be -13,380 ETH. Averaged over a year, this would result in an annual deflation of 4%. Now imagine with ETH demand for PoS, 64 shards at full capacity and reduction in block rewards 🙃. https://t.co/defZOGARnm https://t.co/rgufwLtV32 | 7 replies 57 retweets 193 likes | |
| 1300786419275829254 2020-09-01 06:23:44 -0700 <Teutonium> @iamDCinvestor DeFi use increases tx count which with EIP1559 burns the tx fees, and eth2 staking reward can be increased to reward stakers. So with lots of DeFi fee burning the supply can be set at a fixed rate or low inflation with high incentive and low risk for stakers Something like this? | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1300788024536707076 2020-09-01 06:30:07 -0700 <HeavyNodes> @iamDCinvestor I love how couple weeks ago.. everybody was FUD-aff over $ETH supply.. now, folks are realizing w/ 1) yETH vault 2) EIP 1559 .. 3) De-Fi lock up 4) ETH 2.0 launch 🚀 .. there's not enough to go around. #Crypto | 0 replies 3 retweets 13 likes | |
| 1300790471690776581 2020-09-01 06:39:50 -0700 <krugman25> @RickDeFi Hopefully soon. Toss in EIP-1559 and let's burn some of that $ETH supply. | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1300794840154808321 2020-09-01 06:57:12 -0700 <shatzakis> @VitalikButerin Or what about a "target gas fee" that adjusted (maybe inversely?) relative to max gas limits per block (short or long-term limits) or other variables that could act as a quasi-difficulty adjustment. Just throwing ideas out there, was just looking at EIP1559 (@gakonst thoughts?) | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1300804864960733184 2020-09-01 07:37:02 -0700 <cc_ninjaboys> 全てのマシン稼働含めてdailyで 20ETH近くpayoutされちゃうと、さすがに感覚おかしくなる… 月極の電気代消化ロックアップが気になるどころではない。 EIP1559実装とDefiバブル崩壊、2ndDAOのチキンレースが年内の目玉 | 1 replies 2 retweets 26 likes | |
| 1300808128703987712 2020-09-01 07:50:00 -0700 <_dmc> @eip1559 @bantg The keyword is “should be” - the strategy was whitelisted in Maker OSM, so it can access next hour feed price, meaning there is a 1-hour window where we can act by calling repay() | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1300810054648487937 2020-09-01 07:57:39 -0700 <0xTycoon> @DefiChad @crypto_fruit @zapper_fi Did thid on Sunday and paid around $20 in total. Today certainly isn't the best time. EIP1559 can't come any sooner! | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1300813585799475200 2020-09-01 08:11:41 -0700 <seanmmitchell> @eip1559 indeed but alas I did not indulge in the shorts buying frenzy. | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1300815437211381760 2020-09-01 08:19:02 -0700 <chubchubkun> @cc_ninjaboys この需要ならやはりEIP1559入れないとユーザーが死んじゃいますよね。 | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1300817651875291136 2020-09-01 08:27:50 -0700 <chubchubkun> @cc_ninjaboys まあ、そうなりますよね。今は狂気ではありますよね。でも、EIP1559で手数料ボラをブロックサイズ調整ボラに変化する能力はこの辺りの動きを緩和してくれると祈りたいw | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1300821801564426242 2020-09-01 08:44:20 -0700 <cc_ninjaboys> @chubchubkun 逆にEIP1559が見事にハマって、マイナーインセンティブとセキュリティを両立維持した場合、誰でも流動性が作れてしまって、とんでもないカオスになる予感がしますw そうなるとuniswapに代わる次世代のプロダクトが生まれてきそうです。 | 0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1300829282705371137 2020-09-01 09:14:03 -0700 <wsfoxley> to borrow from @nic__carter , Bitcoin has "bit the bullet" by addressing the fee market sooner rather than later. Ethereum options (EIP 1559, many rollup implementations) remain months away at best. | 0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1300833347724169217 2020-09-01 09:30:13 -0700 <owocki> waiting for EIP 1559 to be production ready && thinking wistfully about all the ETH 1x protocol developers out there, wishing we had treated them better. https://t.co/xzD0pLBrlt | 1 replies 1 retweets 12 likes | |
| 1300844714497728512 2020-09-01 10:15:23 -0700 <tweeettweetbitc> @Casteleah_E @Link__Stacker Please tell me how Pos (Less selling pressure no miners) + Staking (Tokens getting locked up, again less selling pressure) & EIP 1559 burn is going to bring the token price down? | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1300862811808169984 2020-09-01 11:27:17 -0700 <interfluidity> @stephenjudkins while leaving most characteristics and promises intact. (Really, the EIP-1559 et seq proposed alterations in fee structure/auction may be bigger changes from a user perspective than putative absorption into Eth2.) /fin | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1300893860781084672 2020-09-01 13:30:40 -0700 <CryptTano> @eip1559 @BanklessHQ @nanexcool It was golden | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1300905166405763072 2020-09-01 14:15:35 -0700 <iamDCinvestor> @cyphercanaan tx fees are an additional, and somewhat unrelated, source of demand for ETH. But if EIP-1559 is implemented and tx fees are burned, this will reinforce a deflationary store of value characteristic for ETH. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1300907526062563333 2020-09-01 14:24:58 -0700 <nanexcool> @eip1559 @RuneKek I owe Rune everything and I've said it to him many times! This is just a funny meme :) | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1300938692110942209 2020-09-01 16:28:49 -0700 <FulgorSedano6> @Yukiteru_Amano @KevinNegocios @elocadenas @EzioRed @ernestocontrer @anibalcripto @cristpereirag Para ETH 2.0 en su fase final y Sharding aun faltan minimo 3 años. La solucion a corto plazo para escabilidad depende de EIP 1559 y L2 Solutions como Plasma y zkRollups | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1300963526098464769 2020-09-01 18:07:30 -0700 <EthereumQuotes> "I'm worried Ethereum won't go back to "normal". The World Computer is dead. EIP1559 isn't going to help with this. I'm not even sure getting rid of gas completely will fix this." - @AFDudley0 https://t.co/RQcAQszB8G | 0 replies 0 retweets 8 likes | |
| 1300981031038717953 2020-09-01 19:17:03 -0700 <TarasBob> @MikeMcDonald89 Why are you not an ETH believer? 1. When @eip1559 is implemented, the total supply of ETH will begin to shrink. 2. A bunch of ETH will get locked up when proof of stake comes out later this year. 3 Ethereum is by far the most used blockchain in the world. https://t.co/uUOAWJ8biE | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1300982074824949761 2020-09-01 19:21:12 -0700 <adamscochran> It begins. This is the first big ETH blackhole. Then EIP1559. Then ETH2.0. | 0 replies 12 retweets 82 likes | |
| 1301026600545181696 2020-09-01 22:18:08 -0700 <DibyaMi90883637> @VitalikButerin Mr Vitalik what about implementing the EIP 1559 to burn the excess amount of gas fees to 10-20 gwei Please give us some updates about it Mr Vitalik. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1301028651756957696 2020-09-01 22:26:17 -0700 <tarikbell> @_jamiis @tbr90 Thanks for further explaining! My choice of words wasn’t very good. I meant they’re “competing” as in higher gas prices would result in EIP 1559 burning more ETH. So, in a world where L2s are heavily used and results in lower gas prices, the EIP will burn less overall | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1301028996990210054 2020-09-01 22:27:39 -0700 <tarikbell> @_jamiis @tbr90 Kinda unfortunate that both look to be landing at around the same time...EIP 1559 would be amazing right about now! | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1301034968886505478 2020-09-01 22:51:23 -0700 <0xVoyta> @jpxastor @PhABCD @sassal0x Block rewards. Ethereum is currently the same, the EIP1559 would burn part of the fees making it deflationary | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1301061251909537792 2020-09-02 00:35:49 -0700 <das_grasshopper> @vamosvigilante @kaiynne Gas fees= simple offer/demand theory. They could get even higher but with the current L2 solutions and EIP1559 are *current* viable scalability solutions. Kain has a Syntethix L2 version coming up 🔥🔥 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1301067243510550528 2020-09-02 00:59:38 -0700 <AltBitcoine> @TheCryptoDog @VitalikButerin When EIP-1559 ? | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1301068336453754880 2020-09-02 01:03:58 -0700 <cc_ninjaboys> 忠実なプロトコルを守ってきたマイナーが報われた。 世のUniswapersに施し返す恩返しこそ、EIP1559なのである。 | 0 replies 0 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1301081722705113091 2020-09-02 01:57:10 -0700 <LiamJanssens> @PhABCD the problem is how far is eip 1559 away. Because when i saw a short thread from one of the developers i wouldn't be suprised if the eip is still more than a year away. Now that amount is just a fat bonus to miners... | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1301125376542994433 2020-09-02 04:50:38 -0700 <brrabski> @maurelian_ Cool. However many eth devs would read this as implying that EIP1559 and fee burning need to come to the rescue. This isn’t necessarily a good conclusion. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1301140446358515712 2020-09-02 05:50:31 -0700 <nagolinc> @basedkarbon Aren't high gas prices bullish for ETH (from a "someday we'll get EIP-1559" perspective)? | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1301151333869912071 2020-09-02 06:33:46 -0700 <EthMagicians> @eip1559 is on fire again 🔥 https://t.co/BlIWEdRdVZ | 0 replies 1 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1301197792908513280 2020-09-02 09:38:23 -0700 <safetyth1rd> Since fees are crazy high today, I listened to Uncommon Core's podcast on EIP 1559. EIP 1559 changes Ethereum's fee mechanism: The network would auto-adjust a base fee to target an ideal traffic level. @hasufl explains this and its implications: https://t.co/W7ZdnWYF7x | 1 replies 0 retweets 7 likes | |
| 1301201153477283840 2020-09-02 09:51:44 -0700 <DaxTaran> @shatzakis @spencernoon @metamask_io Pretty sure this is part of EIP1559 (gas escalator function) | 2 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1301243072123219968 2020-09-02 12:38:18 -0700 <LiamJanssens> @mrjasonchoi Although i'm bullish on NXM and have been a holder since 2019. NXM can get competitors. Right now sure better index bet but long term with eip 1559 activated eth is the better index bet imo. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1301245430810935296 2020-09-02 12:47:41 -0700 <RealAllenHena> @DaxTaran @shatzakis @spencernoon @metamask_io Is there a target date for EIP1559? | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1301256133529788418 2020-09-02 13:30:13 -0700 <iamDCinvestor> @eip1559 @nanexcool @CmaganMason @bantg @koeppelmann @iearnfinance Yes, he stated that. I'm curious how far it has to fall below 200% before someone can call for a "rebalance." | 2 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1301256340438953984 2020-09-02 13:31:02 -0700 <iamDCinvestor> @eip1559 @nanexcool @CmaganMason @bantg @koeppelmann @iearnfinance Oh wow, already happened 😅 https://t.co/EoxugCsQlY | 2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1301263701819953154 2020-09-02 14:00:17 -0700 <deepcryptodive> @iamDCinvestor @eip1559 @nanexcool @CmaganMason @bantg @koeppelmann @iearnfinance It happened multiple times already 😅 https://t.co/1QOowVg7Zv (scroll down) | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1301267154822717442 2020-09-02 14:14:00 -0700 <shatzakis> @vitalik great explanation. How will solutions like the ZKP rollup that @Loopring is launching help users transacting smaller size tx's? (where the gas fee is a larger % cost). And is there a time-line to when EIP1559 will be implemented? | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1301276819832729606 2020-09-02 14:52:25 -0700 <razamobin> @eip1559 https://t.co/87e5naEMX5 | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1301284575214268418 2020-09-02 15:23:14 -0700 <SawyerMerritt> @eip1559 Oh shittt 🙌 | 2 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1301286682612957187 2020-09-02 15:31:36 -0700 <SawyerMerritt> @eip1559 nice! | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1301287392104636416 2020-09-02 15:34:25 -0700 <SawyerMerritt> @eip1559 My first Tesla will either be a Y or cybertruck | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1301302348451643392 2020-09-02 16:33:51 -0700 <Simp2win> @VitalikButerin money skeleton go brrrrr. when eip 1559? | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1301329449531715585 2020-09-02 18:21:32 -0700 <juliomoros> @LocalCryptosES si llega a implementarse el EIP-1559 (quemar el gas) todos seremos ganadores de jornadas como la de hoy | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1301331602493108225 2020-09-02 18:30:06 -0700 <oha_alex> @eip1559 @WholeMarsBlog Neuralink help us beat the algo | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1301331907435667456 2020-09-02 18:31:18 -0700 <0xTycoon> @dmihal @RyanSAdams EIP1559 support, please In the last few days, I'm always clicking "Advanced" and setting the gwei manually. The estimations are never accurate. | 1 replies 1 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1301346491899031552 2020-09-02 19:29:16 -0700 <ChrisLiMRX3> @eip1559 @WholeMarsBlog @CashApp I think he is talking about Facebook's payment system. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1301353951829331968 2020-09-02 19:58:54 -0700 <ChrisLiMRX3> @eip1559 @WholeMarsBlog @CashApp Yeah, same pretty much. Lol. I've never used venmo, but I have used paypal and CashApp. I prefer CashApp by far. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1301383307821813760 2020-09-02 21:55:33 -0700 <CHalexov2016> 6.7 milion $eth #Ethereum lock in #defi ! 10m lock coming before #pos with Eth2 phase 0 mainnet going live! This is huge! Can be 50% all ETH supply lock in #defi + #pos in 2021? This combination will push $eth price over 1000$ again. + there is gas burn eip-1559 coming. 🪐🕷🪐 https://t.co/bj1y2MnalF | 1 replies 1 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1301387991718350849 2020-09-02 22:14:10 -0700 <0xTycoon> @aliatiia_ Wouldn't EIP1559 help discourage this by smoothing out the gas price volatility? The refund is necessary because it encourages devs to clean up after themselves and free up unused space. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1301399505770819584 2020-09-02 22:59:55 -0700 <aliatiia_> @FrancescoRenziA Nope 😅 From discussions around it, it became clear to me the proposal must also spec out mechanisms for fee burning, block size elasticity, and dynamic bidding .. all under this tokenized gas scheme (meeting all what's expected of EIP1559) I hope to publish that soon! | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1301420920741883904 2020-09-03 00:25:01 -0700 <BillyLuedtke> wish we’d implemented EIP 1559 before all of this | 3 replies 6 retweets 40 likes | |
| 1301426060676886529 2020-09-03 00:45:26 -0700 <0xTycoon> @dmihal @RyanSAdams I know, but the UI for EIP1559 would be different too, and I think wallet devs play a critical role in championing for it. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1301530748659421184 2020-09-03 07:41:26 -0700 <WrongNebula> yETH + EIP 1559 Theory: The millions of ETH locked in Yearn $YFI are not moving, they are not participating in the total of transactions, which mean the amount of ether burned (under EIP 1559) will be lower, which mean yETH is both bullish and bearish for ETH. Am I correct? https://t.co/lG2snmhOmF | 6 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1301532725770240001 2020-09-03 07:49:17 -0700 <TrustlessState> @WrongNebula Just because lots of ETH is in the yETH vault doesn't impact the rate of eth burn in EIP 1559 tho. It's all about blockspace demand. | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1301536000120946689 2020-09-03 08:02:18 -0700 <nigeldollentas> I only see this as bullish. If I understand correctly, EIP 1559 will set a base fee that adjusts base on demand to help wallets predict gas fees. ETH being locked up reduces selling pressure (bullish), reduces network congestion (bullish), and makes other transactions | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1301559273873383427 2020-09-03 09:34:47 -0700 <StefanDGeorge> @BillyLuedtke @MarkBeylin Gas fees would still be super high with eip1559 as there is just not enough supply to cover demand but at least prices would be more balanced out. | 1 replies 0 retweets 7 likes | |
| 1301560020174344192 2020-09-03 09:37:45 -0700 <nethermindeth> The #Nethermind team is growing yet again🥳 This time we're looking for an Econometrist / #Ethereum Engineer to focus on EIP-1559 & the required implementations. Apply via the link below 👇- We look forward to hearing from you! #blockchain #dotnet https://t.co/MDdkWJhozX | 1 replies 14 retweets 44 likes | |
| 1301562313904779264 2020-09-03 09:46:52 -0700 <ioTalent_> @NeerajKA @eip1559 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1301565607318622209 2020-09-03 09:59:57 -0700 <0xEthereum_> What if it’s the miners are coordinating the attack? Theyve been stacking ETH for years. Now all of sudden they’re making ETH hand-over-fist in transaction fees AND they’ve got the most to lose when PoS/EIP1559 go live. Last ditch effort to steal ETH from us “first users”/retail? | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1301574318732832773 2020-09-03 10:34:34 -0700 <bneiluj> @eip1559 thanks for the kind words mate, I appreciate it. | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1301601199473426433 2020-09-03 12:21:23 -0700 <RyanSAdams> Idea: let's make the crazy high gas fees on Ethereum serve a greater purpose as a public good...say...a portion of the gas fee goes to fund Ethereum network security. .... .... .... Spoiler: that's EIP1559. | 4 replies 24 retweets 248 likes | |
| 1301627912651669504 2020-09-03 14:07:32 -0700 <b_d_thompson> @RyanSAdams @antiprosynth What is ETA of EIP1559? | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1301659428043673600 2020-09-03 16:12:45 -0700 <_eljee> @CanaanLinder @jbrukh Overvalued or not, DeFi users are paying thru nose but value not accruing to ETH. Vitalik's tweets about this reveal perhaps network is suffering from a disequilibrium, & perhaps a combo of EIP 1559 and transition to staking will help: https://t.co/vytMkdGsJw | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1301668037603467264 2020-09-03 16:46:58 -0700 <c4chaos> @eip1559 @WholeMarsBlog do tell 😂 | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1301671075843960832 2020-09-03 16:59:03 -0700 <c4chaos> @eip1559 @WholeMarsBlog yes, it’s possible that $TSLA could develop its own open #DLT #IoT protocol. but it would require a global consortium to standardize it. #IOTA is way ahead on that front. the only thing left is #coordicide😅 but hey, only time will tell 🤷🏻♂️ https://t.co/YQTXWhnFg9 | 1 replies 1 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1301677496195194880 2020-09-03 17:24:33 -0700 <c4chaos> @eip1559 @CashApp maybe. as i’ve said before, it’s possible for $TSLA to come up with proprietary protocol, then maybe open it up later like what they did with EVs. that said, the vision of #IOTA is a global DLT protocol. that’s why it’s working on standardization. but only time will tell 😅 | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1301690635930333185 2020-09-03 18:16:46 -0700 <willmorriss4> @wekabot @maurelian_ @PhABCD @aliatiia_ @onewayfunction A similar objection should hold for EIP1559, though currently block size is decided by miners. | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1301702884338196481 2020-09-03 19:05:26 -0700 <c4chaos> @eip1559 @CashApp sure. i’m following #IOTA like a hawk 😅 but hey, a non-standardized #DLT protocol will pose the same challenges as the Supercharging Network ⚡️ see: Double Edged Sword of Tesla's Supercharging Network https://t.co/V6FzEZNihE | 2 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1301706939265507328 2020-09-03 19:21:33 -0700 <_TomHoward> @eip1559 Nothing wrong with it, it’s all I’ve ever known! Funny to see it happening all over the industry right now. | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1301710142509965312 2020-09-03 19:34:17 -0700 <DaveLevine0com> @eip1559 Glad you pointed out my original error. :) | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1301718044318797825 2020-09-03 20:05:41 -0700 <AfMusk> @eip1559 @WholeMarsBlog Great channel. Wish they would make videos of Musk’s projects based on @waitbutwhy content | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1301728649633128448 2020-09-03 20:47:49 -0700 <_TomHoward> @eip1559 Haha I think its more that yield farming is going very well and people are building 6-7 figure nest eggs and realizing they don't really need to work any more Plus they can yield farm full time and maybe get up to 7-8 figure nest egg. | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1301734217500352513 2020-09-03 21:09:57 -0700 <HapaRekk> @c4chaos @eip1559 @CashApp He does | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1301754024085958656 2020-09-03 22:28:39 -0700 <nrryuya_jp> トランザクション手数料のオークションメカニズムは、現在Ethereumで使われているfirst price auctionではなく、採用が検討されているEIP-1559を用いています。 https://t.co/i1ZUCadZXZ | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1301755558874157056 2020-09-03 22:34:45 -0700 <vinami> We just released Shargri-La - a transaction-level sharding simulator for protocol testing against users' behavior on a sharded blockchain🎉 In the initial version, we simulated ETH transfers with EIP-1559. repo: https://t.co/vq7gLBtG9p post: https://t.co/Q6CtaIvZXI | 0 replies 9 retweets 13 likes | |
| 1301756289416982528 2020-09-03 22:37:39 -0700 <nrryuya> For the transaction pricing mechanism, we adopt EIP-1559, instead of the first price auction currently used. (The comparison of them with Shargri-La is a future work!) https://t.co/lIBDXrT2wu | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1301773727911358465 2020-09-03 23:46:57 -0700 <compass_mining> In the short-term, the trend of rising fees & revenue show no sign of reversing as the DeFi hypes continues. In the longer-term, EIP1559 and Ethereum 2.0 deployment will change the blockspace fee market on Ethereum if they are implemented. | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1301880940742885377 2020-09-04 06:52:58 -0700 <TimBeiko> Also, I'll be giving an update on EIP-1559 🔥 Everything significant is in this thread: https://t.co/AzNyzsIT3d Only other update is we managed to raise 48k$ to fund implementations on @nethermindeth (soon!) and @OpenEthereumOrg (a bit later). You can thank @etherealcapital 😁🙏 | 1 replies 4 retweets 14 likes | |
| 1301886678575927297 2020-09-04 07:15:46 -0700 <TimBeiko> Next up is EIP-2718 ( https://t.co/x9rSu7GEEr). The EIP was already marked eligible for inclusion and has been proposed in conjunction with many different EIPs (MetaTxs, Account Abstractions, EIP-1559). | 1 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1301903319078596608 2020-09-04 08:21:54 -0700 <MonetSupply> @scott_lew_is still hoping it becomes a mascot for EIP-1559 fundraising imo would be sorta poetic to fund fee burn research with a deflationary memecoin | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1301906364785192961 2020-09-04 08:34:00 -0700 <ETHPlanet> 📢 ATTN #engineers who want to work on EIP-1559: @nethermindeth is looking for for an Econometrist / #Ethereum Engineer to focus on EIP-1559 & the required implementations. 💼 Apply here>>> https://t.co/EM9UoBlOE3 #hiring https://t.co/3CKHuNFmxQ | 0 replies 2 retweets 7 likes | |
| 1301912802056122368 2020-09-04 08:59:35 -0700 <nagolinc> @RyanSAdams We're in this weird spot where high gas prices are bullish for $ETH long term and bearish short term. Short term: "gas is too expensive"/"Ethereum is broken" and miners dump fees to pay for electricity. Long term: staking + EIP-1559 If you're in for the long term, buy the dip! | 0 replies 0 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1301928662506311681 2020-09-04 10:02:36 -0700 <pc5408> @eip1559 @WholeMarsBlog There might be some antitrust people worried about that lol (I’m all for it too though) | 0 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1301938931311673345 2020-09-04 10:43:24 -0700 <SantoshLonkar13> @VitalikButerin @VitalikButerin When we get relief from Ethereum congestion, its so much delay please implement EIP-1559 fast | 0 replies 1 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1301944276847337473 2020-09-04 11:04:39 -0700 <StaniKulechov> @eip1559 You can borrow SNX against ETH or what so you mean? :) | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1301945423955767297 2020-09-04 11:09:12 -0700 <StaniKulechov> @eip1559 @kaiynne can sort you out | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1301953545814577152 2020-09-04 11:41:29 -0700 <maqstik> Summary of ZIP-11 (together with ZIP-9) for the $ZIL community and why you should care about it : 1. It comes along with a gas fee "burning" mechanism somewhat similar to EIP1559. More network usage => more tokens get locked out of circulation => Value accrual capture. | 4 replies 44 retweets 149 likes | |
| 1301977007685804034 2020-09-04 13:14:42 -0700 <nanexcool> @eip1559 Cryptozombies maybe https://t.co/ZatsKU2rnR | 1 replies 1 retweets 16 likes | |
| 1301999187861659653 2020-09-04 14:42:51 -0700 <Dulce_vird> @eip1559 @nanexcool Also there are Good tutorial to create dapp on YouTube. Doesn't matter where you start eventually you will need to read the documentation. Check @OpenZeppelin tutorials or @DappUniversity too | 1 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1302004639278268416 2020-09-04 15:04:30 -0700 <elusivechad> @tokenterminal @DegenSpartan Look at that... Why the hell isn't EIP-1559 priority #1? Seriously, fuck scaling. EIP-1559 goes in and ETH officially becomes digital gold in six months. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1302014406746927104 2020-09-04 15:43:19 -0700 <_jamiis> What really gets me all hot & bothered most about EIP-1559 is no longer having to explain adjusting gas price in metamask to crypto noob friends. It's one of if not the most cumbersome UX problem rn. Also people naturally understand the concept of tipping to jump the line. | 0 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1302028634492989440 2020-09-04 16:39:51 -0700 <jason_rassett> @eip1559 Oh I know. Im signed up! Im just looking for any bleeding edge info the community has | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1302029314880282629 2020-09-04 16:42:33 -0700 <etherealcapital> Gas Puts Breaks on ETH - EIP-1559 can't come soon enough https://t.co/QAWrihyPch | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1302046808311574528 2020-09-04 17:52:04 -0700 <RyanBerckmans> ETH is the only crypto asset that I'm confident is extremely underpriced. Because - eth's network effects are strong & growing - eth did $4B annual run rate of fees this week - fees accrue to ETH holders as of EIP-1559 or PoS, whichever launches sooner | 8 replies 7 retweets 87 likes | |
| 1302058655139807232 2020-09-04 18:39:09 -0700 <Blox_Staking> #DeFi is stretching ETH gas fees into 'unchartered territories'. The case for ETH2 and EIP-1559 has never been stronger. What will be the next "money game" to test the the network? https://t.co/2ZJFzNkUVF | 2 replies 0 retweets 10 likes | |
| 1302166438766096384 2020-09-05 01:47:26 -0700 <bneiluj> @eip1559 No it doesn't. | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1302249854601539584 2020-09-05 07:18:54 -0700 <MassiveKaizen> @eip1559 @TSLA Etsy is a great company. The eBay for home made products. Hot trend with support local. | 0 replies 1 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1302255616396726278 2020-09-05 07:41:48 -0700 <moreNmoreFunny> @JohnLilic Maybe the dump is from the miners, they had earned too much recently. When eip 1559? @sassal0x | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1302295652739813381 2020-09-05 10:20:53 -0700 <LUKACACIC> @manishbg @iearnfinance that was nothing. every big xchange will stake $ETH . Whales will stake $ETH. retail will stake $ETH. eip 1559 will burn $ETH. Do the math. | 1 replies 0 retweets 11 likes | |
| 1302344922427805696 2020-09-05 13:36:40 -0700 <cryptocasca> Way to manipulate $eth is take out a leveraged long and release EIP-1559. Instant millionaire. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1302388170449915905 2020-09-05 16:28:31 -0700 <PenserETH> @eip1559 @DeFi_Dad @ASvanevik @synthetix_io @kaiynne You need to understand how this works. When you buy a synthetic asset in synthetix you are just like betting on it, and the whole network take the loss (they increase their debt)if you make gains..you don't need the assets, just need the price feeds and everyone to agree about it | 2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1302392841415659522 2020-09-05 16:47:05 -0700 <PenserETH> @eip1559 @DeFi_Dad @ASvanevik @synthetix_io @kaiynne Because it always tradable back in synthetix exchange (which is backed by synthetix debt/collateral mechanism). It is ethereum we tokenize everything. We even tokenize gambling outcomes in prediction markets. | 2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1302393076217008128 2020-09-05 16:48:01 -0700 <PenserETH> @eip1559 @DeFi_Dad @ASvanevik @synthetix_io @kaiynne And these tokenized gambling outcomes (probability that trump will win the election) can then be used all other ethereum like any tokens | 0 replies 1 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1302395605201936386 2020-09-05 16:58:04 -0700 <PenserETH> @eip1559 @DeFi_Dad @ASvanevik @synthetix_io @kaiynne Yes indeed and you can and and everybody who hold snx need to keep their ratio with a 600% ratio. They can't claim weekly fee rewards if their ratio is not at 600 which incentivizes the whole network to keep every week the ratio at 600%. | 3 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1302395773993340928 2020-09-05 16:58:44 -0700 <PenserETH> @eip1559 @DeFi_Dad @ASvanevik @synthetix_io @kaiynne I recommend going to their discord as there will be people answer these questions much better than I do there. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1302396106635182080 2020-09-05 17:00:03 -0700 <PenserETH> @eip1559 @DeFi_Dad @ASvanevik @synthetix_io @kaiynne To keep the ratio high. The whole network not necessarily at 600. You can audit it on https://t.co/hTl1MQMgtO currently at 436% | 2 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1302397162551160832 2020-09-05 17:04:15 -0700 <PenserETH> @eip1559 @DeFi_Dad @ASvanevik @synthetix_io @kaiynne https://t.co/cFf2YS6MiR on the third line on the right you have active collaterization ratio | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1302397396207439874 2020-09-05 17:05:11 -0700 <PenserETH> @eip1559 @DeFi_Dad @ASvanevik @synthetix_io @kaiynne On desktop it s third line of the right..on mobile just scroll down till you find it | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1302401185589198849 2020-09-05 17:20:14 -0700 <larrylouiebear> @eip1559 @MKBHD How many KM do you drive yearly? | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1302412756948258816 2020-09-05 18:06:13 -0700 <JMayenTGU> @eip1559 @nanexcool @DeFiSaver Same question | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1302453982481145857 2020-09-05 20:50:02 -0700 <M157q_News_RSS> 觀點｜以太坊「gas 手續費市場」改革：EIP 1559 會引發公平性問題嗎？ https://t.co/Q1UTjK4ce5 以太坊社群已經針對改革手續費機制形成諸多討論，而 EIP 1559 提案引入了一種新的交易費機制，讓區塊的使用 […] | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1302542703939317760 2020-09-06 02:42:35 -0700 <Xtreme11z> @edwardmorra_btc What you think, how long will the bear market plays out? with the upcoming ETH 2.0 staking launch and EIP 1559 proposal being accepted? | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1302581300323389441 2020-09-06 05:15:57 -0700 <SelectaCrypto> @_Ed1990_ Hes been such a great Etherean lately. Auditing the supply for us, coming out in support of EIP1559. | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1302601720695001091 2020-09-06 06:37:06 -0700 <poodtroll> @SelectaCrypto @_Ed1990_ @pierre_rochard isn't aware of EIP1559 | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1302604163210268678 2020-09-06 06:46:48 -0700 <digi_banc> @Nicolas22594206 @VitalikButerin Tx fees drop when big red happens because people use less smart contracts there reducing the demand therefore reducing the cost. Economics 101 self governed. Work has been done (L2s, staking, eip 1559, sharding, etc...) to make these improve economics. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1302710872326975490 2020-09-06 13:50:49 -0700 <RyanBerckmans> @armaniferrante @Clam10609868 @KyleSamani @SBF_Alameda If you invest in cash flow producing companies, consider buying ETH. Ethereum will be a "cash flow producing company" when EIP-1559 or eth1.5 launches, whichever is sooner. | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1302718710491340801 2020-09-06 14:21:58 -0700 <fubuloubu> @eip1559 Yes, I am not good at this degen thing lmao | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1302775194004664320 2020-09-06 18:06:25 -0700 <CanaryInvest> FIlecoin has been testing EIP 1559 which aims to tackle high network fees on Ethereum. https://t.co/ynt9Soj6fk via @cointelegraph | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1302824974282100736 2020-09-06 21:24:13 -0700 <ChainNewscom> 【以太坊交易费市场改革：探讨 EIP 1559 费用分配公平性问题】以太坊区块空间是「公共土地」，矿工收取高昂交易费就好比是在 「公共土地」 上收取租金。 https://t.co/0zVFF99mu3 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1302865764840603648 2020-09-07 00:06:19 -0700 <FrancescoRenziA> @A_mplify Donate to eip 1559! Gotta improve that gas market | 1 replies 0 retweets 11 likes | |
| 1302951559857307648 2020-09-07 05:47:14 -0700 <cryptow1re> reddit 🤖: EIP-1559 (Fee burn latest update) is a matter of when, not if :) https://t.co/G9n7JC6SVs | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1302951601397739524 2020-09-07 05:47:24 -0700 <cryptow1re> #ethtrader 🤖: EIP-1559 (Fee burn latest update) is a matter of when, not if :) https://t.co/t5vFA1yr58 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1302962328909090821 2020-09-07 06:30:01 -0700 <dankrad> OK guys, good time to get back to buidling! We need * Layer 2 ready * EIP1559 * Eth2 running Then we can have a real party :) | 36 replies 78 retweets 630 likes | |
| 1302964573306265602 2020-09-07 06:38:56 -0700 <harsimranbansal> @eip1559 @WholeMarsBlog Oh shit, I completely zoned out and actually read that as “undervalued” instead of “overvalued.” | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1302968427246571522 2020-09-07 06:54:15 -0700 <0xTycoon> Quick! While everyone is distracted with all the #DeFi drama and $ETH price volatility, let's deploy EIP1559 | 0 replies 1 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1302983069486460928 2020-09-07 07:52:26 -0700 <JimmyRagosa> 🔴 EIP-1559 is not: - a solution to the high gas price issue - being deployed before Q2 2021 🟢 EIP-1559 is: - a gas price volatility dampener - a good counter-meme to 21M hard cap Please refer to this tweet before using EIP-1559's name in vain. | 3 replies 13 retweets 126 likes | |
| 1303028695641120770 2020-09-07 10:53:44 -0700 <TimBeiko> As mentioned on the last EIP-1559 call, we need to reach out to the community to better understand their constraints in implementing and deploying EIP-1559 🛠 Below is a first list of projects/teams we'd like to get in touch with. My DMs are open, please reach out 📩! | 1 replies 28 retweets 59 likes | |
| 1303034626026467328 2020-09-07 11:17:18 -0700 <EthMagicians> Stakeholders in the community impacted by EIP-1559: please reach out to @TimBeiko! There are threads on the Forum for public posting of feedback as well. 👇 | 1 replies 5 retweets 7 likes | |
| 1303035093708046336 2020-09-07 11:19:10 -0700 <itamarl> @TimBeiko @ETHGasStation @UniswapProtocol @Tether_to @1inchExchange @chainlink @synthetix_io @centre_io @circlepay @idexio @CurveFinance @KyberNetwork @AaveAave @0xProject @argentHQ @BalancerLabs @TimBeiko you can DM me or @jniset, happy to discuss about eip1559 and @argenthq | 0 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1303036039884230657 2020-09-07 11:22:55 -0700 <EthMagicians> Are there other stakeholder groups with needs, impacts, and constraints relating to EIP-1559? https://t.co/PK8pwHa9Ji | 2 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1303050405941669889 2020-09-07 12:20:00 -0700 <Tetranode> @Daryllautk I only count my profit in $ETH. Phase 0 is coming. EIP-1559 is coming. #Ethereum is money. https://t.co/4UlgZyfUjZ | 0 replies 0 retweets 14 likes | |
| 1303147035680407552 2020-09-07 18:43:59 -0700 <Danny_Desert> @eip1559 $SNX, $BOND, $LEND, $YFI | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1303152877859344384 2020-09-07 19:07:12 -0700 <golra03> Today, #ETH Gas price is 7.5 times higher as compared to the same day previous year. Gas tokens came to rescue the serious DApp businesses and hedge these fluctuations. #Ethereum May not be enough since the model has its side effects. EIP 1559 could be one solution? | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1303154862880772096 2020-09-07 19:15:05 -0700 <Victori76462546> @eip1559 @WholeMarsBlog Tesla is not a car company...it’s a technology company. There’s a difference. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1303206067556540423 2020-09-07 22:38:33 -0700 <tarunchitra> Curiously, optimizing the gas cost mechanism (e.g. EIP-1559, separating storage payments, etc.) as a way to cause ETH's price to be more of a submartingale is quite under studied, even in traditional finance / operations research ⚠️ But increasing X - E[X] also increases Var[X] | 1 replies 2 retweets 17 likes | |
| 1303225541990940673 2020-09-07 23:55:56 -0700 <antiprosynth> 🟢 EIP-1559 also is: - a way for usage of #Ethereum to more explicitly translate into $ETH value accrual | 2 replies 16 retweets 63 likes | |
| 1303256293243867136 2020-09-08 01:58:08 -0700 <MorganTBennett> @JimmyRagosa Bitcoin's 21M hard cap is a meme. Ethereum's EIP-1559 is an overdue and mission-critical patch. | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1303267440336404480 2020-09-08 02:42:25 -0700 <SantoshLonkar13> @dankrad @VitalikButerin 100℅ people's in the world are Waiting for ETH 2.0, LAYERS & EIP-1559 for better trust on ETH tomorrow | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1303316724415168512 2020-09-08 05:58:16 -0700 <EthereumMemes> Layer 2 + EIP-1559 + Eth2 = #Ethereum at super sonic speed https://t.co/bdrWGW6S60 | 6 replies 13 retweets 44 likes | |
| 1303345050840072192 2020-09-08 07:50:49 -0700 <RyanWatkins_> Of course EIP-1559 willl make it so most of these fees will be burned rather than rewarded to stakers. Moneyness is the ultimate prize. Burning rewards all ETH holders through increased scarcity. | 0 replies 3 retweets 31 likes | |
| 1303362335017373699 2020-09-08 08:59:30 -0700 <ethGarin> @RookieXBT ETH2 is flippening BTC in a few years. Just watch how quickly EIP1559 starts burning ether and becomes more of a deflationary asset. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1303382686589882373 2020-09-08 10:20:22 -0700 <GrennHouseGas> @eip1559 @laurashin @AndreCronjeTech This is very interesting, hope laura asks this | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1303382795293732866 2020-09-08 10:20:48 -0700 <ethstatus> .@rbin recently wrote an introductory article about EIP-1559 and the importance for the Ethereum Community. A lot has happened since then, so here is an update and breakdown of the proposal. https://t.co/XWk9T95Nkm | 3 replies 30 retweets 70 likes | |
| 1303384049801547776 2020-09-08 10:25:47 -0700 <ph_status> Tingnan ang artikulo na binuo ni @rbin patungkol sa EIP-1559. At basahin ang link sa ibaba. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1303387246205317121 2020-09-08 10:38:29 -0700 <wildixx> @eip1559 @laurashin @AndreCronjeTech This is actually one of the blockchain use cases. Not any project in particular but technology in general. | 0 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1303398460469764101 2020-09-08 11:23:03 -0700 <cryptow1re> reddit 🤖: EIP-1559: An Update & Breakdown of the Proposal https://t.co/uRT9D3oLYZ | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1303401296305836036 2020-09-08 11:34:19 -0700 <rbin> Check out my most recent article — an update about what's happening with EIP-1559! | 0 replies 1 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1303409360803168257 2020-09-08 12:06:22 -0700 <Davidutro> @eip1559 https://t.co/e4JrQbe4Z7 | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1303422157167435777 2020-09-08 12:57:13 -0700 <r_Ethereum> EIP-1559: An Update & Breakdown of the Proposal #Ethereum https://t.co/lRAaBb4vZI | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1303595315459690496 2020-09-09 00:25:17 -0700 <DomainAddress4u> EIP-1559: An Update & Breakdown of the Proposal via /r/ethereum https://t.co/7mkaX78h8c hot 🔥 in #reddit #ethereum #eth #crypto | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1303600637196865536 2020-09-09 00:46:26 -0700 <Davis224Jake> EIP-1559: An Update & Breakdown of the Proposal via /r/ethereum https://t.co/98uFwoZ4Zf https://t.co/PJyEbMisUz #Crypto #Ether #CoinOfferings https://t.co/0qOq49LPna | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1303604792732733441 2020-09-09 01:02:57 -0700 <alee> up until this point, crypto market caps were mostly just a proxy to investor community size and retail investor sentiment a LOT changes when POS & EIP1559 will be mechanisms that will help correlate platform adoption w/ $ETH value accrual 🌕 | 2 replies 5 retweets 20 likes | |
| 1303612210716061696 2020-09-09 01:32:25 -0700 <TeodorChirac> Check out the latest updates on EIP - 1559 - TLDR -> make transaction fees more predictable on the network *Recap *Implementers Call *Research & Implementation updates *EIP -2718 *Additional Development resources *Roll Out Plan/ Timeline *Conclusion | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1303615332427464705 2020-09-09 01:44:49 -0700 <ACryptoB1> EIP-1559: An Update & Breakdown of the Proposal https://t.co/8x0JHDmQPI | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1303630624801148928 2020-09-09 02:45:35 -0700 <RyanBerckmans> @udiWertheimer @RyanWatkins_ @tokenterminal @MessariCrypto With EIP-1559, a portion of fees are burned and accrue to ETH holders like a stock buyback. Burned fees contribute to earnings. eth2 is unlikely to lower total fees. Here's why: https://t.co/OFrp5ym3W2 | 0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1303639261539860480 2020-09-09 03:19:55 -0700 <rsmeman> @eip1559 @IvanOnTech Jerome Powell is not your uncle | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1303789128199225344 2020-09-09 13:15:26 -0700 <somi_teslagirl> @eip1559 Ooh I left already. Would have loved some breakfast! Next time!! | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1303795053194817540 2020-09-09 13:38:58 -0700 <Baz14587134> @eip1559 @jpr007 As a hodler you begin to enjoy those windy moments | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1303799218805460992 2020-09-09 13:55:31 -0700 <jpr007> @eip1559 Refreshing breeze Everything looks to be in much healthier condition now https://t.co/ktvaWXgj8Q | 1 replies 0 retweets 11 likes | |
| 1303803004395675650 2020-09-09 14:10:34 -0700 <voliswell> @eip1559 @jpr007 We dissected $TSLA just from market structure earlier...may be of interest... https://t.co/0FnI3U2RI8 | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1303804218848038913 2020-09-09 14:15:23 -0700 <BestGhostAudrey> @eip1559 Yeah 😊 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1303804615071334400 2020-09-09 14:16:58 -0700 <voliswell> @eip1559 @jpr007 https://t.co/WOq6wn3brG is what we use...app is brand new | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1303827735844982784 2020-09-09 15:48:50 -0700 <JeffsGarden> @eip1559 @jpr007 Lol😂 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1303838681510244352 2020-09-09 16:32:20 -0700 <harrycanuck> @DeFiGod1 Tbh I don't know how Link accrues value I know it's used for staking Link nodes, and used to pay them, but in my mind it runs into the utility token problem like BAT where the supply just gets recycled. There's no EIP1559 like mechanism I can see | 1 replies 0 retweets 9 likes | |
| 1303841225447858177 2020-09-09 16:42:27 -0700 <JoeyScarantino> @eip1559 Totally understandable! I love it too! https://t.co/Zlt2l9yUSw | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1303843212499410944 2020-09-09 16:50:20 -0700 <JoeyScarantino> @eip1559 No doubt ;) | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1304020698533306368 2020-09-10 04:35:36 -0700 <PJusername> @100trillionUSD @callidum101 @Breedlove22 @Grayscale @RyanSAdams @TrustlessState 2/2 I know the differences between their inflation schedules - BTC hard coded.. but with Ethereums massive utility, EIP1559, staking and yETH, we can't argue that inflation needs to be hard coded. The market forces of ETH's utility will, are determining its value... | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1304066184166416385 2020-09-10 07:36:21 -0700 <Fiskantes> @mrjasonchoi Longterm we have EIP 1559 etc. | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1304068424411295745 2020-09-10 07:45:15 -0700 <BanklessFR> Salut les Bankless 🏴 🎁 Aujourd’hui nous vous offrons un hors-série ! 🔥 Nous parlons ici de l’EIP 1559. Pour plus de détails, c’est par là : https://t.co/rOhlBvbxjB Bonne 📰 lecture et à très bientôt 👋 | 1 replies 5 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1304068992332713984 2020-09-10 07:47:30 -0700 <BCD_Guru> Let's meme EIP 1559 into a reality .. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1304069308931362817 2020-09-10 07:48:46 -0700 <gregthegreek> @realLedgerwatch @q9fmz We're not that crazy 🤪 But actually HF testing with swappable consensus to PoA for something as simple as EIP-1559 would be incredible. Simulations would be relatively easy. There are so many supporters, just redeploy sites with that network in mind and ask everyone to use it | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1304072056540147714 2020-09-10 07:59:41 -0700 <RealAllenHena> @iamDCinvestor Can't wait until someone yells that ETH isn't decreasing in supply because they don't know about EIP-1559 | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1304077845023674369 2020-09-10 08:22:41 -0700 <LeUnderground> @drakefjustin Inflation reduction and possibly deflation. How long has it been? Two years since EIP 1559 was first proposed? | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1304078912675360778 2020-09-10 08:26:56 -0700 <Iso_IX> @RyanSAdams Can we get EIP 1559? 🚀!! | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1304090559473225730 2020-09-10 09:13:12 -0700 <b33pityb00pity> @eip1559 Hello, fellow humans. I am not a robot. *human noise* | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1304110730954895360 2020-09-10 10:33:22 -0700 <BanklessFR> cc @eip1559 😎 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1304182296027652096 2020-09-10 15:17:44 -0700 <ioTalent_> @elonmusk @MonicaLewinsky @eip1559 🤣 | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1304208682599747584 2020-09-10 17:02:35 -0700 <tztokchad> @MohdHead @SalsaTekila Eip1559 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1304234537040228352 2020-09-10 18:45:19 -0700 <OG_Etherean> @JohnLilic @antiprosynth @tokenterminal EIP-1559🔥🔥🔥🔥 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1304284448570056709 2020-09-10 22:03:39 -0700 <Asliajay_> @swaaalla @drakefjustin This certainly explains bitcoin's money soundness and why it's so unique. (As for eth supply decrease, it's after the implementation of EIP1559, tokens locked onto Defi systems, staking after PoS etc.) | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1304306341759000577 2020-09-10 23:30:39 -0700 <sassal0x> EIP-1559 is cancelled | 16 replies 3 retweets 147 likes | |
| 1304341916843225088 2020-09-11 01:52:01 -0700 <bezantdenier> @giacomozucco Even if the footnote holds, changing the money in this matter sends a terrible signal. EIP 1559 does not make ETH 'harder', it makes it 'easier', yet they celebrate it. | 1 replies 1 retweets 8 likes | |
| 1304394791871041539 2020-09-11 05:22:07 -0700 <wwwjansli> @SPJ14228 @AwyeeDeaterBob @melikmanukyan @drakefjustin PoS adds the following Stakers get rewarded with blocks (6min) and with the transaction fee deflationary counter meassury proposed by Vitalik EIP-1559 want to burn transaction fees. All in all it will work like a central bank deflate and inflate to keep a base. | 3 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1304396577910423552 2020-09-11 05:29:13 -0700 <RealAllenHena> @Viejonazo89 @CryptoW49104301 @GreyWizard8 @Reuters @esaagar @jack Newsflash...Bitcoin is inflating too until 2140. Until 2140 the 21M theory can't be validated. Also with EIP-1559 ETH will actually be deflationary. I am sure you knew that though. | 2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1304398532292628480 2020-09-11 05:36:59 -0700 <RealAllenHena> @CryptoW49104301 @Viejonazo89 @GreyWizard8 @Reuters @esaagar @jack This BTC max supply is mythical. No one will know for sure until 2140. You're assuming people not even born yet are going to never change BTC's supply metrics. Also educate yourself about EIP-1559. Makes it deflationary. https://t.co/PNbwhWmcNv | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1304400446711357442 2020-09-11 05:44:35 -0700 <RealAllenHena> @CryptoW49104301 @Viejonazo89 @GreyWizard8 @Reuters @esaagar @jack BTC's circulating supply is increasing every year. When EIP-1559 gets implemented, at a certain point of utilization, supply declines lol | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1304406724049281026 2020-09-11 06:09:32 -0700 <TobbyKitty> @Kokook64718635 L2 EIP-1559 Sharding Plasma | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1304432253758582786 2020-09-11 07:50:59 -0700 <yangWao> @twigwam Yet EIP-1559 kicks-in. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1304435849854152704 2020-09-11 08:05:16 -0700 <poojaranjan19> Inviting @Ethereum #miners, #wallets, #exchanges, #DApps and other infrastructure providers to better understand their concerns in implementing and to update with the progress on #EIP-1559. DM me or @TimBeiko to set up a meeting or provide feedback with https://t.co/I7PkXc5PI3 | 1 replies 6 retweets 10 likes | |
| 1304474503498530816 2020-09-11 10:38:52 -0700 <DaveLevine0com> @eip1559 @Tesla @DirtyTesla only follow experts! Dirty Tesla doesn't look expert ish to me. For news on Tesla I listen to @elonmusk and @CathieDWood | 3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1304476093857046528 2020-09-11 10:45:11 -0700 <DirtyTesla> @DaveLevine0com @eip1559 @Tesla @elonmusk @CathieDWood I'm an expert I promise 😂 | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1304481738308026368 2020-09-11 11:07:37 -0700 <DaveLevine0com> @eip1559 @DirtyTesla @Tesla @elonmusk @CathieDWood There is zero info for "About" on his Twitter and Youtube. You can't qualify as an expert if you are invisible. And he is competing with Elon and Cathie Wood. I only follow 70 people on twitter. He might have to step it up a bit. | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1304489373937917955 2020-09-11 11:37:57 -0700 <DirtyTesla> @eip1559 @DaveLevine0com @Tesla @elonmusk @CathieDWood Idc I'm just kidding around :P | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1304528839498964992 2020-09-11 14:14:46 -0700 <dankrad> @ArthurB I think you missed the most important point of the EIP1559-style fee market. It burns the transaction fees, which will (hopefully) exceed the subsidies and make the cryptocurrency itself objectively valuable for the first time. https://t.co/sfXPDO7Gd5 | 2 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1304552298509668355 2020-09-11 15:48:00 -0700 <Teutonium> @Martijncvv Check out EIP1559, it's basically Ethereum trying to do what VeChain has been doing since the beginning, burning tx fees. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1304585441576796161 2020-09-11 17:59:41 -0700 <Tetranode> @bluekirbyfi This also means that $YFI pricing will also scale with $ETH #Ethereum. ETH Phase 0 deposit contract coming SOON. ETH EIP-1559 coming next year. High gas prices next year means high ETH prices. $YFI will be there to leverage those benefits. | 0 replies 1 retweets 13 likes | |
| 1304605857586515970 2020-09-11 19:20:49 -0700 <RJ_Kunz> @eip1559 @RyanSAdams This works because it functions as a browser and the DeFi activities do not happen in the app itself. TLDR; @Apple is stupid. | 0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1304666035828776960 2020-09-11 23:19:57 -0700 <cburgdorf> @StefanDGeorge How about rolling out EIP 1559 to xDAI? | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1304668712667021313 2020-09-11 23:30:35 -0700 <Tyler10502> @sassal0x Has eip 1559 been implemented? Any timeline? | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1304814632456998912 2020-09-12 09:10:25 -0700 <mattdwest> @sassal0x Is that with or without EIP-1559? 🤔 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1304823121095151632 2020-09-12 09:44:09 -0700 <tokenstate> $BNB is a much better investment than BTC since everyday BNB gets more scarce. @SpartanProtocol I can only imagine when EIP-1559 kicks in on ETH 🔥 decreasing supply > fixed supply | 0 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1304985933909958659 2020-09-12 20:31:06 -0700 <alexgausman> @eip1559 Please elaborate 🙏 | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1305096656376004608 2020-09-13 03:51:05 -0700 <davidiach> I wonder how many hundreds of millions of dollars will end up being wasted because we didn't implement EIP-1559 sooner. | 9 replies 8 retweets 67 likes | |
| 1305101189776801792 2020-09-13 04:09:05 -0700 <LiamJanssens> @davidiach Yep and everyone agrees and somehow there is still no timeline on it. Probably still a year away i fear. Flippening would have probably already happened if we had eip 1559 now. | 1 replies 1 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1305116917959598080 2020-09-13 05:11:35 -0700 <th_sat> フィーシステムを予測可能なものとする提案EIP-1559解説記事 https://t.co/GInGm1TPiv | 0 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1305218710723014656 2020-09-13 11:56:05 -0700 <RominaSejas92> @eip1559 Hi! Thanks for rt! You can read the original post in https://t.co/8jkrjVuqE9 I try to contribute to the latam crypto ecosystem with some translations from English to Spanish 😅 | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1305248001313705985 2020-09-13 13:52:28 -0700 <IsaacLatterell> @eip1559 @WholeMarsBlog @elonmusk As well as grammar issues | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1305306514496917504 2020-09-13 17:44:59 -0700 <DirtyTesla> @eip1559 @Tesla https://t.co/7gHWJ1clsh | 1 replies 0 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1305326025438564353 2020-09-13 19:02:30 -0700 <block_muncher> @PenserETH @eip1559 @DeFi_Dad @ASvanevik @synthetix_io @kaiynne Thx. Are these similar to options? | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1305343614910779393 2020-09-13 20:12:24 -0700 <Cryptoutsorcing> @davidiach Other than $STAKE, what other EIP-1559 projects do you suggest worth looking into? Looking to learn more thanks. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1305358087549845506 2020-09-13 21:09:55 -0700 <bantg> @eip1559 It's Binance's EVM-compatible chain. People are flipping burgers there or something, I'm out of the loop. | 1 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1305373705162371072 2020-09-13 22:11:58 -0700 <bantg> @eip1559 Me neither, I didn't even have any BNB to deploy a contract and had to ask ask around. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1305431480034713602 2020-09-14 02:01:33 -0700 <YahsinHuang> Le prochain événement en ligne aura donc lieu le 24 septembre, jeudi après-midi à 16 heures, heure de Taiwan. Les sujets traités sont la gouvernance Ethereum, EIP 1559, la sécurité, le Web3, la finance décentralisée, les solutions de couche 2 et plus encore. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1305453826669912064 2020-09-14 03:30:21 -0700 <LongShortFundin> I'm a hyper $ETH bull, but I do completely agree with @Rewkang here. However, the all-out shill comments from ETH-maxi makes me🤦♂️ EIP-1559 needs to be implemented for ETH to actually accrue value intrinsically. | 0 replies 0 retweets 4 likes | |
| 1305487841078718466 2020-09-14 05:45:30 -0700 <BruMo_Crypto> @eip1559 @JamesClear only if your bank acct is your ONLY requirement for "SUCCESS" | 2 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1305513201191325697 2020-09-14 07:26:17 -0700 <Unscrip24849698> @BruMo_Crypto @eip1559 @JamesClear It is! | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1305514389047451654 2020-09-14 07:31:00 -0700 <evan_van_ness> #MostClicked * @MyCrypto eth2 guide for users * @peterk https://t.co/2Qpwx9CYtT * @etherscan yield farming page * @iearnfinance's Maker competitor * @NomiChef gives back 38k eth * @TimBeiko eip1559 surveying interested parties * @NomicLabs: @github now autodetects @solidity_lang | 1 replies 10 retweets 23 likes | |
| 1305522458993319938 2020-09-14 08:03:04 -0700 <JimmyRagosa> Can we get some sort of progress feedback feature in @Gitcoin Grants, @owocki ? For example, I have given a few $DAI to the "EIP-1559 Community Fund" and would love to know how they've been spent so far. Funding public goods and accountability go very well together. https://t.co/VnhTemebmg | 1 replies 3 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1305539322477715457 2020-09-14 09:10:04 -0700 <tbr90> $PICKLE incentive design both works and is structured so that YFI and other hard-cap protocols won’t be able to compete in this lucrative niche. Incentivizing people to push stablecoins back to the peg requires an incentive, so it both mints & burns like ETH & EIP-1559. | 4 replies 3 retweets 46 likes | |
| 1305545673304088576 2020-09-14 09:35:19 -0700 <EthCatHerders> Ethereum Cat Herders Update #29 Medalla data challenge, YOLOv2 proposals, Peep an EIP, EIP-1559, breakout-room, hackathon, Gitcoin grant, and other community updates https://t.co/6Z8G3osZfe @ethereum #Updates #YOLOv2 https://t.co/lyQWxO4XIS | 0 replies 12 retweets 16 likes | |
| 1305546181389541381 2020-09-14 09:37:20 -0700 <kimpaquette> @eip1559 @seanmmitchell https://t.co/4tO5ketd2F | 0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1305569043252940807 2020-09-14 11:08:10 -0700 <tbr90> @diskandartweet Who, YFI? The system doesn’t work without rewards from the protocol. It’s a mint, buy & burn setup like ETH w EIP-1559. It’s incompatible w hard cap coins. Bc of it’s burn, total supply may go down as activity picks up. | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1305578740382986240 2020-09-14 11:46:42 -0700 <alexgausman> @eip1559 Perfect setup ;) https://t.co/men5ZpnRQJ | 1 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1305623304791830529 2020-09-14 14:43:47 -0700 <polina_marinova> @eip1559 @APompliano I APPRECIATE YOU LAUGHING!!!! (unclear if it was at my joke or @APompliano's face but still!) | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1305626787779543040 2020-09-14 14:57:38 -0700 <TimBeiko> Quick @gitcoin update for the EIP-1559 grant 🔥 We've decided to not have the grant be part of the next CLR matching round starting tomorrow. We still have the bulk of the funds raised last time and felt the CLR match would be best going towards other projects this time. | 2 replies 7 retweets 62 likes | |
| 1305630725912383488 2020-09-14 15:13:17 -0700 <polina_marinova> @eip1559 @APompliano :) never! | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1305634574123200512 2020-09-14 15:28:34 -0700 <TimBeiko> I am verifying my ownership of EIP-1559 Community Fund on Gitcoin Grants at https://t.co/DLWU223ms1. 🎉🎆⚡🎊🙌🎉 | 0 replies 0 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1305656901682827267 2020-09-14 16:57:17 -0700 <NexusVirtual> @eip1559 @DeFi_Dad @avichal https://t.co/5Y8Q9nBVIP | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1305663098888445952 2020-09-14 17:21:55 -0700 <Gfilche> @eip1559 trying to make sure it's ready b4 christmas. people need extra 💕 this year | 2 replies 0 retweets 26 likes | |
| 1305697120293273606 2020-09-14 19:37:06 -0700 <Tetranode> I'm going to counter-trade this. Recall farm tools back to the $ETH #ETHEREUM mothership. Phase 0 in November. EIP-1559 to rule DeFi next year. Phase 1 resulting in data availability for trustless rollup. Phase 1.5 cutting rewards to nearly zero. Phase 2 for execution. https://t.co/sJ6YZkh6jW | 1 replies 4 retweets 32 likes | |
| 1305701233504563202 2020-09-14 19:53:27 -0700 <DibyaMi90883637> @dankrad @VitalikButerin Mr Dankrad when will be Eip 1559 ready and Ethan 2.0 phase 1 on mainnet | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1305702906771828737 2020-09-14 20:00:06 -0700 <rande3p> @TylerDurden @eip1559 Lol cool thought but just isn’t true | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1305716759488425985 2020-09-14 20:55:09 -0700 <rande3p> @eip1559 @TylerDurden Yeah I understood I just don’t agree with it - of course it is the case with some people but not in my experiences with those that are “wealthy” and those that are not | 1 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1305718950957690885 2020-09-14 21:03:51 -0700 <rande3p> @eip1559 @TylerDurden I understand the tweet lol - yes it’s the case in some cases and not the case in others - that’s all. | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1305820746447384578 2020-09-15 03:48:21 -0700 <eyitemiegwuenu> @Gfilche @eip1559 Short sellers need double extra love; it hasn’t been easy for them. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1305830758532018179 2020-09-15 04:28:08 -0700 <MoonstonePubs> @DaveLevine0com @UniswapProtocol @coinbase We can only fulfil this timeline after EIP-1559, otherwise ETH's value accrual is subpar at the moment. | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1305906207740190720 2020-09-15 09:27:57 -0700 <chamath> @eip1559 @Opendoor Opendoor has 70% share and is 4.4x bigger than their next nearest competitor. | 5 replies 2 retweets 55 likes | |
| 1305911159648780288 2020-09-15 09:47:37 -0700 <jcobbz7> @eip1559 Internet, media and technology | 2 replies 1 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1305917932640243712 2020-09-15 10:14:32 -0700 <rande3p> @eip1559 @TylerDurden If we speak in generalizations then sure - if we are speaking in a nuanced way (which I understand most of the twitter world isn’t doing lol) then that’s where I see the fallacy in the statement lol - ✊🏽👍🏽 | 2 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1305927243521232898 2020-09-15 10:51:32 -0700 <JMacInvesting> @chamath @eip1559 @Opendoor Hey @chamath sent an email via Social Capital, trying to get you on the channel for an interview. I cover all things SPACs and since your the SPAC god..... https://t.co/upMgojyQPB | 2 replies 1 retweets 26 likes | |
| 1305927352103337984 2020-09-15 10:51:58 -0700 <Somethi45268535> @JMacInvesting @chamath @eip1559 @Opendoor That would be awesome! 👍🏻 | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1305930310010494976 2020-09-15 11:03:43 -0700 <jvrod14> @JMacInvesting @chamath @eip1559 @Opendoor LFG👍👍👍 | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1305931530473099264 2020-09-15 11:08:34 -0700 <Rajiv_KG> @jcobbz7 @eip1559 with the right leadership in place now they can be amazon of real estate and all the related services (so many possibilities). | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1305934235094495232 2020-09-15 11:19:19 -0700 <Kristennetten> @eip1559 I think it will be inevitable to participate in life without it. Once the AI become involved they will direct all paths that direction. | 1 replies 0 retweets 3 likes | |
| 1305934426296082432 2020-09-15 11:20:04 -0700 <DownwardDave> @eip1559 @chamath @Opendoor I think he is cherry picking stats. Zillow put their home buying on hold in Q2. Zillow IMO is way ahead. Zillow is doing a combination of what open door is trying to do while at the same time becoming the largest brokerage in the world with zillow flex. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1305941219579584513 2020-09-15 11:47:04 -0700 <stillstainless> @eip1559 @chamath @Opendoor Id assume homie is its trailing competition. They are only UT AZ NV, though market leader as far as I can tell in those markets | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1305963724944093184 2020-09-15 13:16:30 -0700 <pridesai> @eip1559 nimbooda nimbooda 🍋 | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1305968151478198272 2020-09-15 13:34:05 -0700 <AJamesMcCarthy> @eip1559 I have a gallery linked in my bio, I sell prints through imagekind! | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1305976424990269441 2020-09-15 14:06:58 -0700 <viveksworld> @DoctorSpac @chamath @eip1559 @Opendoor Pay 5% and take 4 months with no garauntee of actually selling or pay 5% and it’s done in 3 days. | 2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes | |
| 1305978051126153218 2020-09-15 14:13:25 -0700 <AJamesMcCarthy> @eip1559 Thank you!! | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1305979968011161600 2020-09-15 14:21:02 -0700 <lam600> @viveksworld @DoctorSpac @chamath @eip1559 @Opendoor Boom 🤯 | 0 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1305983511942266881 2020-09-15 14:35:07 -0700 <AnalyserOver> @eip1559 I do like index funds, but from what understand, no staking rewards (YFI, LRC, KBR, SNX) and an annual 0.95% fee. Great for low value passive investment DCA, but long term Hodl for higher values you may be better buying the 10 tokens. | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1305984195466940416 2020-09-15 14:37:50 -0700 <Shantp21> @chamath @eip1559 @Opendoor How is Social Capital going to be another Berkshire? How can I just get into Social Capital without having to invest in all these IPOB-IPOZ? | 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes | |
| 1305986968417832960 2020-09-15 14:48:51 -0700 <Venturinglist> @eip1559 @viveksworld @DoctorSpac @chamath @Opendoor It also reduces flip depreciation risk for open door. Transactional taxes are a hedge | 1 replies 0 retweets 1 likes | |
| 1306009248602742790 2020-09-15 16:17:24 -0700 <JusticeUnchaind> @eip1559 @danheld @jack @CashApp https://t.co/6nSV23o0rE | 0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1306029075362971656 2020-09-15 17:36:11 -0700 <Jack64128896> @chamath @eip1559 @Opendoor Zillow home segment revenue for 2019 is around $2.7 Billion. Opendoor is $4.7. So they are only 1.7x bigger in terms of revenue. Number of homes sold comparing to Zillow is 4.4x. Just want to add few more points | 1 replies 0 retweets 2 likes | |
| 1306033058445840385 2020-09-15 17:52:00 -0700 <viv |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment