-
-
Save rust-play/83cf56fb26c730ea69ce049087a8e9f9 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Code shared from the Rust Playground
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| //! Generalizing Cryptographic Reductions and the Forking Lemma in Pure Rust. | |
| //! This implementation relies strictly on the standard library. | |
| use std::collections::HashMap; | |
| use std::cell::RefCell; | |
| // ========================================================================= | |
| // 1. Core Mathematical Abstractions (Prime Field & Mock Curve) | |
| // ========================================================================= | |
| /// A primitive Mock Field element / Scalar under modulo N. | |
| /// For simplicity of this proof simulation, we use a small prime N. | |
| const GROUP_ORDER: u64 = 1000003; | |
| #[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq, Hash)] | |
| pub struct Scalar(pub u64); | |
| impl Scalar { | |
| pub fn add(self, other: Scalar) -> Scalar { | |
| Scalar((self.0 + other.0) % GROUP_ORDER) | |
| } | |
| pub fn sub(self, other: Scalar) -> Scalar { | |
| Scalar((GROUP_ORDER + self.0 - other.0) % GROUP_ORDER) | |
| } | |
| pub fn mul(self, other: Scalar) -> Scalar { | |
| Scalar((self.0 * other.0) % GROUP_ORDER) | |
| } | |
| /// Extended Euclidean Algorithm for modular inverse | |
| pub fn invert(self) -> Option<Scalar> { | |
| if self.0 == 0 { return None; } | |
| let (mut a, mut m, mut x0, mut x1) = (self.0 as i64, GROUP_ORDER as i64, 0i64, 1i64); | |
| while a > 1 { | |
| let q = a / m; | |
| let mut t = m; | |
| m = a % m; | |
| a = t; | |
| t = x0; | |
| x0 = x1 - q * x0; | |
| x1 = t; | |
| } | |
| if x1 < 0 { x1 += GROUP_ORDER as i64; } | |
| Some(Scalar(x1 as u64)) | |
| } | |
| } | |
| /// Represents a Group Element (e.g., a Public Key P = xG). | |
| /// In our generalized model, we simulate a cyclic group where Generator G = 1. | |
| #[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq, Hash)] | |
| pub struct GroupElement(pub u64); | |
| impl GroupElement { | |
| pub fn generator() -> Self { | |
| GroupElement(1) | |
| } | |
| pub fn scale(scalar: Scalar) -> Self { | |
| GroupElement((GroupElement::generator().0 * scalar.0) % GROUP_ORDER) | |
| } | |
| pub fn add(self, other: GroupElement) -> Self { | |
| GroupElement((self.0 + other.0) % GROUP_ORDER) | |
| } | |
| } | |
| // ========================================================================= | |
| // 2. Defining the Hard Problem & The Adversary Traits | |
| // ========================================================================= | |
| /// The Discrete Logarithm Problem (DLP) Challenge. | |
| /// Given a `GroupElement` (Q), find the `Scalar` (q) such that Q = qG. | |
| pub struct DlpChallenge { | |
| pub target: GroupElement, | |
| } | |
| /// Traits defining an Adversary capable of forging a Taproot-like signature. | |
| /// A valid signature components in this generalized framework are a commitment scalar `R` | |
| /// and a response scalar `s`. | |
| #[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy)] | |
| pub struct ForgerySignature { | |
| pub r_out: Scalar, | |
| pub s_out: Scalar, | |
| } | |
| /// The Adversary interface. The adversary interacts with a Random Oracle (the hash function) | |
| /// to produce a forgery against a given public key challenge. | |
| pub trait TaprootAdversary { | |
| fn execute<F>(&self, public_key: GroupElement, random_oracle: F) -> ForgerySignature | |
| where | |
| F: FnMut(Scalar) -> Scalar; | |
| } | |
| // ========================================================================= | |
| // 3. The Random Oracle Engine (Intermediary for Forking) | |
| // ========================================================================= | |
| /// A programmable Random Oracle that lets a Simulator intercept, record, | |
| /// and dynamically alter hash responses during execution. | |
| pub struct RandomOracleSimulator { | |
| pub history: RefCell<Vec<Scalar>>, | |
| pub assigned_responses: RefCell<HashMap<Scalar, Scalar>>, | |
| pub fixed_responses: Vec<Scalar>, | |
| } | |
| impl RandomOracleSimulator { | |
| pub fn new(fixed_responses: Vec<Scalar>) -> Self { | |
| Self { | |
| history: RefCell::new(Vec::new()), | |
| assigned_responses: RefCell::new(HashMap::new()), | |
| fixed_responses, | |
| } | |
| } | |
| /// The mocking routing passed to the adversary | |
| pub fn query(&self, message: Scalar) -> Scalar { | |
| self.history.borrow_mut().push(message); | |
| let mut assigned = self.assigned_responses.borrow_mut(); | |
| if let Some(&cached) = assigned.get(&message) { | |
| return cached; | |
| } | |
| // Pull from our pre-programmed list of responses if available | |
| let idx = assigned.len(); | |
| let response = if idx < self.fixed_responses.len() { | |
| self.fixed_responses[idx] | |
| } else { | |
| Scalar(42) // Fallback static value | |
| }; | |
| assigned.insert(message, response); | |
| response | |
| } | |
| } | |
| // ========================================================================= | |
| // 4. The Generalized Forking Lemma & Reduction Engine | |
| // ========================================================================= | |
| /// The reduction engine. It implements the "Trap" that takes an adversary | |
| /// and forces them to solve the hard DLP challenge. | |
| pub struct ReductionEngine; | |
| impl ReductionEngine { | |
| /// Reduces the Discrete Logarithm Problem to a Taproot Forgery Attack. | |
| /// This function acts as the Simulator described in cryptographic proofs. | |
| pub fn solve_dlp<A: TaprootAdversary>(challenge: DlpChallenge, adversary: A) -> Result<Scalar, &'static str> { | |
| // --- RUN 1 --- | |
| // Setup a random oracle sequence for the first run | |
| let oracle_run_1 = RandomOracleSimulator::new(vec![Scalar(5005), Scalar(9009)]); | |
| // Treat the target DLP challenge key Q directly as our Tweaked Public Key P' | |
| let tweaked_pubkey = challenge.target; | |
| // Execute the adversary up to their forgery state | |
| let forgery_1 = adversary.execute(tweaked_pubkey, |msg| oracle_run_1.query(msg)); | |
| // Locate the point where the adversary committed to the hash challenge | |
| let histories_1 = oracle_run_1.history.borrow().clone(); | |
| if histories_1.is_empty() { | |
| return Err("Adversary did not query the Random Oracle; cannot fork."); | |
| } | |
| // Find the specific critical query message that bound the signature to the hash | |
| let critical_query = histories_1[0]; | |
| let hash_challenge_1 = *oracle_run_1.assigned_responses.borrow().get(&critical_query).unwrap(); | |
| // --- RUN 2 (The Fork) --- | |
| // We rewind time. We change the response to the critical query to a *new* challenge value. | |
| let hash_challenge_2 = Scalar(7777); // Divergent hash response | |
| let oracle_run_2 = RandomOracleSimulator::new(vec![hash_challenge_2, Scalar(9009)]); | |
| // Force the adversary to execute again under identical setup but a modified hash response | |
| let forgery_2 = adversary.execute(tweaked_pubkey, |msg| oracle_run_2.query(msg)); | |
| // --- ALGEBRAIC CANCELLATION --- | |
| // From Run 1: s1 = r + e1 * q | |
| // From Run 2: s2 = r + e2 * q | |
| // Implies: (s1 - s2) = q * (e1 - e2) | |
| // Implies: q = (s1 - s2) / (e1 - e2) | |
| let s_diff = forgery_1.s_out.sub(forgery_2.s_out); | |
| let e_diff = hash_challenge_1.sub(hash_challenge_2); | |
| let e_diff_inv = e_diff.invert().ok_or("Modular inverse failed; division by zero.")?; | |
| let private_key = s_diff.mul(e_diff_inv); | |
| // Verify the extraction is mathematically correct against the original hard challenge | |
| if GroupElement::scale(private_key) == challenge.target { | |
| Ok(private_key) | |
| } else { | |
| Err("Reduction extracted an invalid scalar.") | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| // ========================================================================= | |
| // 5. Instantiating a Mock Adversary to Validate the System | |
| // ========================================================================= | |
| /// A mock adversary that successfully cheats if given an oracle, | |
| /// unknowingly exposing itself to the Forking Lemma reduction trap. | |
| pub struct MockAdversary { | |
| pub secret_nonce_r: Scalar, | |
| } | |
| // Fixed line 209: Removed 'fallthrough' keyword mistake | |
| impl TaprootAdversary for MockAdversary { | |
| fn execute<F>(&self, public_key: GroupElement, mut random_oracle: F) -> ForgerySignature | |
| where | |
| F: FnMut(Scalar) -> Scalar, | |
| { | |
| // 1. Commit to a temporary cryptographic point | |
| let r_out = self.secret_nonce_r; | |
| // 2. Query the oracle using the public key and data configuration | |
| let e_challenge = random_oracle(Scalar(public_key.0)); | |
| // 3. Craft a forgery assuming knowledge of a hidden secret relation | |
| // Real-world adversaries use mathematical cleverness; here we model the output relations | |
| // Forgery verification identity: sG = R + eQ. | |
| // Assuming hidden private relation q = 555 for the mock. | |
| let hidden_q = Scalar(555); | |
| let s_out = r_out.add(e_challenge.mul(hidden_q)); | |
| ForgerySignature { r_out, s_out } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| // ========================================================================= | |
| // 6. Execution Driver | |
| // ========================================================================= | |
| fn main() { | |
| println!("--- Initializing Generalized Reduction Setup ---"); | |
| // Define a hard Discrete Logarithm Problem challenge: | |
| // Given Q = GroupElement(555), extract the hidden scalar '555' via the Generator. | |
| let hidden_solution = Scalar(555); | |
| let challenge = DlpChallenge { | |
| target: GroupElement::scale(hidden_solution), | |
| }; | |
| println!("DLP Challenge Target Public Key Point: {:?}", challenge.target); | |
| // Instantiate our target attacker engine | |
| let adversary = MockAdversary { | |
| secret_nonce_r: Scalar(12345), // Static internal state for the deterministic adversary | |
| }; | |
| println!("\nExecuting Forking Lemma simulation inside the Reduction Engine..."); | |
| match ReductionEngine::solve_dlp(challenge, adversary) { | |
| Ok(extracted_secret) => { | |
| println!("-------------------------------------------------------"); | |
| println!("SUCCESS: Forking Lemma Reduction Extracted Secret Successfully!"); | |
| println!("Extracted Secret Scalar: Solution = {}", extracted_secret.0); | |
| println!("Matches Original Target: {}", extracted_secret.0 == hidden_solution.0); | |
| println!("-------------------------------------------------------"); | |
| } | |
| Err(e) => { | |
| println!("Reduction failed: {}", e); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment