Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@rust-play
Created June 13, 2026 16:15
Show Gist options
  • Select an option

  • Save rust-play/83cf56fb26c730ea69ce049087a8e9f9 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.

Select an option

Save rust-play/83cf56fb26c730ea69ce049087a8e9f9 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Code shared from the Rust Playground
//! Generalizing Cryptographic Reductions and the Forking Lemma in Pure Rust.
//! This implementation relies strictly on the standard library.
use std::collections::HashMap;
use std::cell::RefCell;
// =========================================================================
// 1. Core Mathematical Abstractions (Prime Field & Mock Curve)
// =========================================================================
/// A primitive Mock Field element / Scalar under modulo N.
/// For simplicity of this proof simulation, we use a small prime N.
const GROUP_ORDER: u64 = 1000003;
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq, Hash)]
pub struct Scalar(pub u64);
impl Scalar {
pub fn add(self, other: Scalar) -> Scalar {
Scalar((self.0 + other.0) % GROUP_ORDER)
}
pub fn sub(self, other: Scalar) -> Scalar {
Scalar((GROUP_ORDER + self.0 - other.0) % GROUP_ORDER)
}
pub fn mul(self, other: Scalar) -> Scalar {
Scalar((self.0 * other.0) % GROUP_ORDER)
}
/// Extended Euclidean Algorithm for modular inverse
pub fn invert(self) -> Option<Scalar> {
if self.0 == 0 { return None; }
let (mut a, mut m, mut x0, mut x1) = (self.0 as i64, GROUP_ORDER as i64, 0i64, 1i64);
while a > 1 {
let q = a / m;
let mut t = m;
m = a % m;
a = t;
t = x0;
x0 = x1 - q * x0;
x1 = t;
}
if x1 < 0 { x1 += GROUP_ORDER as i64; }
Some(Scalar(x1 as u64))
}
}
/// Represents a Group Element (e.g., a Public Key P = xG).
/// In our generalized model, we simulate a cyclic group where Generator G = 1.
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq, Hash)]
pub struct GroupElement(pub u64);
impl GroupElement {
pub fn generator() -> Self {
GroupElement(1)
}
pub fn scale(scalar: Scalar) -> Self {
GroupElement((GroupElement::generator().0 * scalar.0) % GROUP_ORDER)
}
pub fn add(self, other: GroupElement) -> Self {
GroupElement((self.0 + other.0) % GROUP_ORDER)
}
}
// =========================================================================
// 2. Defining the Hard Problem & The Adversary Traits
// =========================================================================
/// The Discrete Logarithm Problem (DLP) Challenge.
/// Given a `GroupElement` (Q), find the `Scalar` (q) such that Q = qG.
pub struct DlpChallenge {
pub target: GroupElement,
}
/// Traits defining an Adversary capable of forging a Taproot-like signature.
/// A valid signature components in this generalized framework are a commitment scalar `R`
/// and a response scalar `s`.
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy)]
pub struct ForgerySignature {
pub r_out: Scalar,
pub s_out: Scalar,
}
/// The Adversary interface. The adversary interacts with a Random Oracle (the hash function)
/// to produce a forgery against a given public key challenge.
pub trait TaprootAdversary {
fn execute<F>(&self, public_key: GroupElement, random_oracle: F) -> ForgerySignature
where
F: FnMut(Scalar) -> Scalar;
}
// =========================================================================
// 3. The Random Oracle Engine (Intermediary for Forking)
// =========================================================================
/// A programmable Random Oracle that lets a Simulator intercept, record,
/// and dynamically alter hash responses during execution.
pub struct RandomOracleSimulator {
pub history: RefCell<Vec<Scalar>>,
pub assigned_responses: RefCell<HashMap<Scalar, Scalar>>,
pub fixed_responses: Vec<Scalar>,
}
impl RandomOracleSimulator {
pub fn new(fixed_responses: Vec<Scalar>) -> Self {
Self {
history: RefCell::new(Vec::new()),
assigned_responses: RefCell::new(HashMap::new()),
fixed_responses,
}
}
/// The mocking routing passed to the adversary
pub fn query(&self, message: Scalar) -> Scalar {
self.history.borrow_mut().push(message);
let mut assigned = self.assigned_responses.borrow_mut();
if let Some(&cached) = assigned.get(&message) {
return cached;
}
// Pull from our pre-programmed list of responses if available
let idx = assigned.len();
let response = if idx < self.fixed_responses.len() {
self.fixed_responses[idx]
} else {
Scalar(42) // Fallback static value
};
assigned.insert(message, response);
response
}
}
// =========================================================================
// 4. The Generalized Forking Lemma & Reduction Engine
// =========================================================================
/// The reduction engine. It implements the "Trap" that takes an adversary
/// and forces them to solve the hard DLP challenge.
pub struct ReductionEngine;
impl ReductionEngine {
/// Reduces the Discrete Logarithm Problem to a Taproot Forgery Attack.
/// This function acts as the Simulator described in cryptographic proofs.
pub fn solve_dlp<A: TaprootAdversary>(challenge: DlpChallenge, adversary: A) -> Result<Scalar, &'static str> {
// --- RUN 1 ---
// Setup a random oracle sequence for the first run
let oracle_run_1 = RandomOracleSimulator::new(vec![Scalar(5005), Scalar(9009)]);
// Treat the target DLP challenge key Q directly as our Tweaked Public Key P'
let tweaked_pubkey = challenge.target;
// Execute the adversary up to their forgery state
let forgery_1 = adversary.execute(tweaked_pubkey, |msg| oracle_run_1.query(msg));
// Locate the point where the adversary committed to the hash challenge
let histories_1 = oracle_run_1.history.borrow().clone();
if histories_1.is_empty() {
return Err("Adversary did not query the Random Oracle; cannot fork.");
}
// Find the specific critical query message that bound the signature to the hash
let critical_query = histories_1[0];
let hash_challenge_1 = *oracle_run_1.assigned_responses.borrow().get(&critical_query).unwrap();
// --- RUN 2 (The Fork) ---
// We rewind time. We change the response to the critical query to a *new* challenge value.
let hash_challenge_2 = Scalar(7777); // Divergent hash response
let oracle_run_2 = RandomOracleSimulator::new(vec![hash_challenge_2, Scalar(9009)]);
// Force the adversary to execute again under identical setup but a modified hash response
let forgery_2 = adversary.execute(tweaked_pubkey, |msg| oracle_run_2.query(msg));
// --- ALGEBRAIC CANCELLATION ---
// From Run 1: s1 = r + e1 * q
// From Run 2: s2 = r + e2 * q
// Implies: (s1 - s2) = q * (e1 - e2)
// Implies: q = (s1 - s2) / (e1 - e2)
let s_diff = forgery_1.s_out.sub(forgery_2.s_out);
let e_diff = hash_challenge_1.sub(hash_challenge_2);
let e_diff_inv = e_diff.invert().ok_or("Modular inverse failed; division by zero.")?;
let private_key = s_diff.mul(e_diff_inv);
// Verify the extraction is mathematically correct against the original hard challenge
if GroupElement::scale(private_key) == challenge.target {
Ok(private_key)
} else {
Err("Reduction extracted an invalid scalar.")
}
}
}
// =========================================================================
// 5. Instantiating a Mock Adversary to Validate the System
// =========================================================================
/// A mock adversary that successfully cheats if given an oracle,
/// unknowingly exposing itself to the Forking Lemma reduction trap.
pub struct MockAdversary {
pub secret_nonce_r: Scalar,
}
// Fixed line 209: Removed 'fallthrough' keyword mistake
impl TaprootAdversary for MockAdversary {
fn execute<F>(&self, public_key: GroupElement, mut random_oracle: F) -> ForgerySignature
where
F: FnMut(Scalar) -> Scalar,
{
// 1. Commit to a temporary cryptographic point
let r_out = self.secret_nonce_r;
// 2. Query the oracle using the public key and data configuration
let e_challenge = random_oracle(Scalar(public_key.0));
// 3. Craft a forgery assuming knowledge of a hidden secret relation
// Real-world adversaries use mathematical cleverness; here we model the output relations
// Forgery verification identity: sG = R + eQ.
// Assuming hidden private relation q = 555 for the mock.
let hidden_q = Scalar(555);
let s_out = r_out.add(e_challenge.mul(hidden_q));
ForgerySignature { r_out, s_out }
}
}
// =========================================================================
// 6. Execution Driver
// =========================================================================
fn main() {
println!("--- Initializing Generalized Reduction Setup ---");
// Define a hard Discrete Logarithm Problem challenge:
// Given Q = GroupElement(555), extract the hidden scalar '555' via the Generator.
let hidden_solution = Scalar(555);
let challenge = DlpChallenge {
target: GroupElement::scale(hidden_solution),
};
println!("DLP Challenge Target Public Key Point: {:?}", challenge.target);
// Instantiate our target attacker engine
let adversary = MockAdversary {
secret_nonce_r: Scalar(12345), // Static internal state for the deterministic adversary
};
println!("\nExecuting Forking Lemma simulation inside the Reduction Engine...");
match ReductionEngine::solve_dlp(challenge, adversary) {
Ok(extracted_secret) => {
println!("-------------------------------------------------------");
println!("SUCCESS: Forking Lemma Reduction Extracted Secret Successfully!");
println!("Extracted Secret Scalar: Solution = {}", extracted_secret.0);
println!("Matches Original Target: {}", extracted_secret.0 == hidden_solution.0);
println!("-------------------------------------------------------");
}
Err(e) => {
println!("Reduction failed: {}", e);
}
}
}
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment