Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@rjpower

rjpower/gemini-analysis.md

Created December 17, 2024 05:25
Show Gist options
  • Save rjpower/dedacca821de74e9103b98c0613f8827 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save rjpower/dedacca821de74e9103b98c0613f8827 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Download ZIP
Raw
gemini-analysis.md

Okay, let's analyze the errors and their root causes from the provided test results.

General Observations:

  1. Type Errors: A large portion of the failures are due to TypeError. The model frequently tries to use types incorrectly in the code generated (e.g., performing arithmetic operations on an int and a ComplexNumber, or passing a dictionary to a function expecting a string).
  2. Logical Errors: The model's code also suffers from logical errors. For example, the from_pov and path_to logic is flawed, leading to incorrect tree re-orientations. The two_bucket logic has an issue with switching buckets and not exploring all states. The change method's greedy algorithm fails at edge cases, the book_store code has pricing logic mistakes and the variable-length-quantity code has some issues with bit operations.
  3. Incorrect Input Parsing: Some tests fail because the model's code fails to properly parse the input data. These include issues parsing SGF format, handling numerical strings in wordy and correctly formatting phone numbers.
  4. Incorrect Logic in Iterations/Loops: Several errors arise from incorrect logic when handling iterations/loops (e.g. with format entries in the ledger, or not breaking the two_bucket loop correctly), and improper use of loop/iteration in other contexts (e.g. calculating the number of paths or appending to lists incorrectly).
  5. Missing Functionality: The model misses implementing functionality. This is present in the react, the forth, the bowling and many other cases where the function does not fully implement the logic.
  6. Incorrect Exception Messages: The errors raise ValueErrors but with the wrong error messages, or don't raise errors when they should. The model also has issues understanding how to use a custom Exception in the forth exercise. The tests are very strict with these messages and are specifically designed to be so.
  7. Incomplete Implementation of Classes: In many cases, the methods are not added to classes in the correct location which then leads to errors at runtime.

Now, let's analyze each file individually:

1. ./pov:

  • Errors:
    • test_can_find_path_from_nodes_other_than_x, test_can_find_path_to_cousin, test_can_find_path_to_sibling: The path_to method is unable to find paths because it's trying to re-orient the tree and then perform the search in the newly oriented tree which isn't correct. The initial code also misses out handling the duplicate node case.
  • Failures:
    • test_can_reroot_a_complex_tree_with_cousins, test_can_reroot_a_tree_with_a_parent_and_many_siblings, test_can_reroot_a_tree_with_a_parent_and_one_sibling: The from_pov method is not correctly re-orienting the tree, particularly with attaching the subtrees which lead to incorrect structures.
    • The test errors indicate failures from the incorrect implementation of path_to, and the test failures indicate issues with the from_pov and the attach_subtrees function.
    • test_errors_if_destination_does_not_exist, test_errors_if_source_does_not_exist, test_errors_if_target_does_not_exist_in_a_large_tree, test_errors_if_target_does_not_exist_in_a_singleton_tree: ValueError messages were not matching the required messages.
    • test_moves_children_of_the_new_root_to_same_level_as_former_parent: Children of the new root are not being moved to the same level as the former parent.
  • Root Cause:
    • The errors in path_to are obvious logic errors related to reorienting the tree and then searching in the re-oriented tree.
    • The errors in from_pov and attach_subtrees are more subtle, related to incorrect iterative logic when traversing the list of path.
    • The error messages were not implemented correctly.
    • The logic for re-attaching subtrees was flawed and caused a variety of errors related to incorrect placement of nodes.
  • Analysis: Mixed - Some were subtle and some were obvious.
    • The errors in the path finding were obvious.
    • The errors in from_pov and its subtrees were subtle.
    • The error in how the subtrees were added was subtle.

2. ./two-bucket:

  • Errors:
    • test_measure_using_bucket_one_of_size_2_and_bucket_two_of_size_3_start_with, test_measure_using_bucket_one_of_size_3_and_bucket_two_of_size_5_start_with (both with bucket one start and bucket two start): The measure function fails with a ValueError("No solution found") even when a solution should be found. The error comes from an incorrect bucket switching logic that prevents the program from exploring all possibilities. *test_measure_using_bucket_one_of_size_7_and_bucket_two_of_size_11_start_with, test_with_the_same_buckets_but_a_different_goal_then_it_is_possible: The test errors indicate an issue with the logic for switching buckets and not exploring all the possible states.
  • Failures:
    • All of the above test cases also fail as they cause the same ValueError.
  • Root Cause:
    • The issues in measure are subtle and stem from an incorrect conditional logic for switching the current bucket during pours. The code incorrectly switches the current bucket based on whether the source bucket was emptied or the destination bucket was full after a pour. This incorrect logic made it not explore all possible states leading to the "No solution found" error even though a solution exists.
  • Analysis: Subtle. The error is not immediately apparent in the logic.

3. ./book-store:

  • Failures:
    • All tests fail. The errors mostly indicated that the answers where float instead of integers.
    • Most of the assertions indicate incorrect return values and incorrect sorting in specific test cases.
  • Root Cause:
    • The primary error was that it was doing float calculations instead of integers for the prices, which was easy to fix.
  • However, there were several logical errors in how the best price is computed. It was using a greedy algo, which is not the correct way to solve this.
  • Analysis: Mixed.
    • The float error was an obvious and easy to fix error.
    • The logical errors in finding the best combination was more subtle.

4. ./variable-length-quantity:

  • Failures:
    • test_arbitrary_double_byte, test_arbitrary_quadruple_byte, test_arbitrary_quintuple_byte, test_arbitrary_triple_byte, test_largest_double_byte, test_largest_quadruple_byte, test_largest_triple_byte, test_many_multi_byte_values, test_maximum_32_bit_integer_input, test_smallest_double_byte, test_smallest_quadruple_byte, test_smallest_quintuple_byte, test_smallest_triple_byte, test_two_multi_byte_values: The encode function produces incorrect byte sequences. The error arises because the mask and shift operations are performed in the wrong order. The continuation bit logic is also incorrect.
  • Root Cause:
    • The issues are subtle and related to incorrect bit manipulation and conditional logic in the while loop during the encoding process.
  • Analysis: Subtle. The error is not obvious without detailed debugging the bitwise logic.

5. ./error-handling:

  • Errors:
    • test_return_none, test_return_tuple: The input data was a string instead of an integer which caused a TypeError.
  • Failures: * test_filelike_objects_are_closed_on_exception: The exception was not raised by the do_something method and therefore the test was failing.
  • Root Cause:
    • The TypeError is fairly straightforward, the input should be converted to an int before performing the division operation.
    • The test_filelike_objects_are_closed_on_exception fails because it expected an exception to be raised by the do_something method, but the original code doesn't raise an exception in that method.
  • Analysis: Obvious errors and some missing functionality.

6. ./change:

  • Errors:
    • test_another_possible_change_without_unit_coins_available, test_possible_change_without_unit_coins_available: Incorrect value of coins being returned for a specific combination of available coins.
  • Failures:
    • test_a_greedy_approach_is_not_optimal: The code fails because it's using a greedy approach, which does not lead to the optimal combination in this case.
    • test_cannot_find_negative_change_values: The code does not throw the right error message for a negative change target.
    • test_change_with_lilliputian_coins, test_change_with_lower_elbonia_coins: The greedy approach does not work with these sets of coins.
  • test_large_target_values, test_multiple_coin_change: The greedy approach again gives incorrect results.
  • Root Cause:
    • The main issue is the use of a greedy algorithm, which will not always produce the optimal solution.
    • The error message for a negative target was not correctly implemented, with a slightly different expected message.
  • Analysis: The greedy approach failure is obvious with the results provided, the error message is a subtle detail.

7. ./ledger:

  • Errors:
    • All tests produce errors related to IndexError: list index out of range.
  • Failures:
    • test_credit_and_debit and test_multiple_entries_on_same_date_ordered_by_description: The tests also fail, because they rely on the logic that is being performed when calling get_next_entry and adding entries.
  • Root Cause:
    • The IndexError is due to the main logic for processing the list of entries inside the while loop. The code attempts to pop items from this list while at the same time using it in another loop, which causes an IndexError.
  • Analysis: Obvious and subtle.

8. ./variable-length-quantity:

  • Errors:
    • Various tests (e.g. test_arbitrary_double_byte, test_arbitrary_quadruple_byte) are failing because of incorrect byte sequences.
  • Failures:
    • All the tests are failing.
  • Root Cause:
    • The byte construction logic was flawed and was doing mask and then shift, when it needed to do it the other way around.
  • Analysis: Subtle. The error was a subtle logical error related to incorrect bit manipulation.

9. ./proverb:

  • Errors:
    • All the errors show a TypeError: proverb() got multiple values for argument 'qualifier' or proverb() missing 1 required positional argument: 'items'.
  • Failures:
    • test_an_optional_qualifier_can_be_added and test_one_piece: The test was checking for the error messages which were not implemented correctly.
  • Root Cause:
    • The errors indicate that the way the method proverb is accepting the parameters is incorrect. The test suite is passing the items through a spread operator (i.e. *input_data), which has to be handled in the function definition.
  • The test failures indicate the exception messages where incorrect.
  • Analysis: Obvious. The code was misusing the keyword arguments and the test case provided enough evidence.

10. ./change:

  • Errors:
    • test_another_possible_change_without_unit_coins_available and test_possible_change_without_unit_coins_available`: Returns an incorrect change combination for a specific combination of coins available.
  • Failures:
  • All the test cases are failing, the code returns the wrong change combinations, or incorrect error messages.
  • Root Cause:
  • The code was using a greedy algorithm, which does not generate all solutions.
  • The exception messages were not being correctly implemented.
  • Analysis: Mixed. The issue with the algorithm is obvious from test failures, however the exception messages are very specific and require detailed attention.

11. ./book-store:

  • Failures:
    • All the tests are failing, indicating logical errors in calculation and incorrect sorting.
  • Root Cause:
    • There was a small error using the pricing values as floats instead of integers, and incorrect sorting.
    • However, the core logical problem is that the code was using a greedy approach instead of checking all valid combinations.
  • Analysis: Mixed. The pricing was obvious but the greedy algorithm was a subtle problem.

12. ./two-bucket:

  • Errors:
  • The code was throwing a ValueError("No solution found.") even when a solution was expected.
  • Failures:
  • All test cases are failing for the same reason.
  • Root cause:
  • The issue was in the incorrect logic in how the current_bucket variable was switched. The code was incorrectly setting the current_bucket which prevented it from exploring all possible states.
  • Analysis: Subtle. The code logic is not very verbose, and it's not obvious how the bucket is chosen when the tests fail.

13. ./variable-length-quantity:

  • Failures: All tests fail because of an incorrect encoding and decoding.
  • Root cause:
    • The code had errors in the bit masking and shifting logic, leading to incorrect encoding.
  • Analysis: Subtle. The incorrect encoding is not easily found from the test cases alone, but the bitwise logic is easy to pinpoint once you start to debug the code.

14. ./error-handling

  • Errors:
    • The tests test_return_none and test_return_tuple fail due to TypeError, indicating a mismatch between the types of input and the function arguments.
  • Failures:
    • test_filelike_objects_are_closed_on_exception: The do_something function was not raising an exception which caused a test failure.
  • Root cause:
    • The input is being passed as string instead of int for the methods handle_error_by_returning_none and handle_error_by_returning_tuple, but is being used in the division, which caused a type error. The test was asserting that an exception would be raised by the do_something method, which was not implemented in the original code.
  • Analysis: Obvious errors and some missing functionality.
    • The type error is obvious.
    • The missing exception is also fairly straightforward to deduce.

15. ./atbash-cipher

  • Failures: All the tests fail, due to an incorrect output.
  • Root cause: The core logic of applying the mask before the shift was incorrect.
  • Analysis: Subtle. The error is not obvious without examining the bit manipulation code.

16. ./book-store

  • Failures: Most tests fail due to a incorrect output and calculations, indicating incorrect prices or calculations.
  • Root cause: Incorrect calculation using float numbers and incorrect implementation of pricing logic.
  • Analysis: Mixed. The pricing error was easy to find, but understanding that a greedy implementation was wrong was subtle.

17. ./change

  • Errors:
    • The method did not account for the target being negative which it should have checked.
    • The algorithm would return incorrect combinations for specific scenarios.
  • Failures: All test cases were failing.
  • Root cause:
    • The algorithm used a greedy approach that does not provide all optimal answers.
    • The logic to check for an error was also slightly wrong, causing the tests to fail.
  • Analysis: Mixed. The greedy algorithm was a high level implementation issue, whereas the error message checking was subtle.

18. ./ledger

  • Errors: The code had an index out of range error.
  • Failures: The code had index out of range error and returned incorrect results.
  • Root cause: The main loop had an incorrect indexing logic. The while loop would loop while entries still had values, but within this loop was a for loop that would also pop values. The loops combined led to index errors when accessing specific elements from the entries list.
  • Analysis: Obvious. The indentation and for loop combination makes the error easy to find.

19. ./scale-generator

  • Errors: Several test cases were failing with the ValueError, and most of them indicating not in a list.
  • Failures: All test cases were failing.
  • Root cause:
    • The code was not handling the capitalization correctly when finding indexes in the notes list.
  • Analysis: Obvious. The code was not being careful with the inputs.

20. ./zipper:

  • Errors:
    • Multiple TypeError caused by functions that return None values, but the tests then immediately try to call a method on them.
  • Failures: * None of the tests passed because the errors caused issues with the rest of the test.
  • Root Cause:
    • The error was an incorrect usage of the methods and how None was returned, which caused the methods to crash when None was used.
  • Analysis: Obvious. The usage of methods was not correct.

21. ./connect

  • Errors: The tests were failing, indicating an error in logic
  • Failures: The tests were failing as it returned an invalid output (e.g. None or "" instead of 'X')
  • Root cause: The logic for checking the path was not correct and it was not returning the correct player if they won.
  • Analysis: Obvious. The errors were present due to incorrect method implementation

22. ./forth:

  • Errors: All tests fail due to a TypeError: expected string or bytes-like object error. This is because the evaluate() function was receiving a list of string instead of just a string for its input.
  • Root cause: The re.findall in evaluate was receiving a list instead of string.
  • Analysis: Obvious. The traceback and error provided enough evidence for an immediate resolution.

23. ./hangman:

  • Errors: The test, test_winning_on_last_guess_still_counts_as_a_win, fails due to a ValueError("The game has already ended."), which occurs when a winning guess is made on the last turn, indicating that the game state transition is not correct.
  • Failures:
    • The tests test_after_10_failures_the_game_is_over, test_feeding_a_correct_letter_twice_counts_as_a_failure, all fail due to incorrect updates of the game's state.
  • Root Cause:
    • The order of status changes in the guess function was incorrect. The status is checked before the guess is processed, which is wrong as the guess could be the winning guess.
    • The code was not correctly switching game states.
    • The code was also incorrectly decrementing the remaining guesses when the same letter was guessed again.
  • Analysis: Mixed. The error with the processing order is subtle, and the duplicate letter handling is also subtle.

24. ./transpose:

  • Failures: Many tests were failing. The errors indicated incorrect character positions in output.
  • Root Cause: Incorrect padding logic and how the transposed array is constructed.
  • Analysis: Obvious the error stems from a bad implementation in the character looping for padding and the transposed string.

25. ./killer-sudoku-helper

  • Failures: All the tests failed as the return values were incorrect.
  • Root cause: The code had multiple errors, first it returned strings, then it was not returning the correct values.
  • Analysis: Obvious. The errors where easy to spot from the failing tests.

26. ./ocr-numbers

  • Failures: Most test failures indicate that the ocr numbers cannot be decoded by the function and are marked as ?, also the tests for incorrect column or row counts fail, because the function does not handle these cases correctly
  • Root Cause: The convert function was not handling a variety of cases correctly. First, the logic for returning was incorrect, leading to tests failing. It then had more specific errors related to the different shapes of the number.
  • Analysis: Mostly subtle. The issue was that the code needed to handle a variety of edge cases, which is subtle to correctly implement, along with proper parsing and error messages.

27. ./food-chain

  • Failures: All test cases were failing due to an incorrect output, or not enough lines of output.
  • Root cause: The logic of adding the specific lines in the correct order was incorrect.
  • Analysis: Subtle. The errors stem from an incorrect implementation of how to add the correct lines in the correct verses.

28. ./grade-school

  • Failures: All the test cases fail, but there are different error messages for each. Some due to incorrect return types, and some due to incorrect addition or handling of repeated student.
  • Root cause:
    • The add_student method was incorrectly returning a dict instead of bools.
    • The roster method was also adding duplicate entries when the same student is added to multiple classes.
  • Analysis: Obvious. The return types for the functions were incorrect, and the duplicates were caused by a simple omission of a check.

29. ./complex-numbers

  • Errors:
    • Most tests failed due to an AttributeError: 'int' object has no attribute 'imaginary'. The type error indicates incorrect usage of int or floats as they where not being converted to complex numbers first.
  • Failures:
    • All test cases were failing.
  • Root Cause:
    • The code was not correctly handling cases where it needs to operate with ints/float instead of ComplexNumbers. The code also did not correctly implement reverse operators.
  • Analysis: Obvious. The lack of reverse operators and handling of ints instead of complex numbers are evident from the stack traces.

30. ./satellite

  • Failures: All the tests where failing and indicating that the output is not equal to expected output.
  • Root Cause: The core logic was correct for building the tree, however, the tests assert to the actual object (Node) instead of a dictionary.
  • Analysis: Obvious. The tests are checking the objects instead of a dict.

31. ./hangman:

  • Errors: The tests would fail with an error at the end when a win occurred.
  • Failures: Multiple tests fail due to incorrect state updates, and the error message is incorrect.
  • Root cause: The logic within the guess method was not ordering the updates correctly, which caused a ValueError at the end. The same method was not correctly handling the duplicate correct letters or when the number of guesses was zero.
  • Analysis: Mixed. The error related to the processing order is subtle, the status update and duplicate letter handling issues were obvious.

32. ./word-search:

  • Failures: All the tests fail due to incorrect position objects.
  • Root cause: The Point objects were being created once instead of being recreated on every new search. This resulted in incorrect object references and a failure in equality.
  • Analysis: Obvious. The code was reusing point objects which was causing the incorrect tuples.

33. ./forth:

  • Errors: All test cases fail due to a TypeError: expected string or bytes-like object.
  • Failures: All the tests were failing
  • Root cause: The code was passing a list to the evaluate function instead of a string, which the re findall does not accept, and causes the type error.
  • Analysis: Obvious. The stack traces make it apparent that there is a type mismatch.

34. ./food-chain:

  • Failures: All tests fail due to incorrect song verses.
  • Root Cause:
    • The generated verses had the lines "I don't know why..." and "She swallowed the ... to catch the..." in the wrong verses.
  • Analysis: Subtle. The verses are not created from a linear iteration but with specific conditional statements, which made it subtle to find the error.

In summary, there's a mix of issues:

  • Obvious Errors: Incorrect variable types in arithmetics/methods that expected certain
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment