-
Star
(183)
You must be signed in to star a gist -
Fork
(36)
You must be signed in to fork a gist
-
-
Save nocturnalgeek/1b8fa44283314544c487 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
| @binkmail.com | |
| @bobmail.info | |
| @chammy.info | |
| @devnullmail.com | |
| @letthemeatspam.com | |
| @mailinater.com | |
| @mailinator.net | |
| @mailinator2.com | |
| @notmailinator.com | |
| @reallymymail.com | |
| @reconmail.com | |
| @safetymail.info | |
| @sendspamhere.com | |
| @sogetthis.com | |
| @spambooger.com | |
| @spamherelots.com | |
| @spamhereplease.com | |
| @spamthisplease.com | |
| @streetwisemail.com | |
| @suremail.info | |
| @thisisnotmyrealemail.com | |
| @tradermail.info | |
| @veryrealemail.com | |
| @zippymail.info |
Yes, there is no way we should use legitimate email addresses online for anything except the most important resources we use (banking, social security, tax office). All the rest is too much at risk of being hacked or leaked, as webmasters do not properly maintain and apply security updates to their websites and forums. Not associating a real email to random website registration forms is a good security practice, as is a regular check on haveibeenpwned...
Be careful: willmedtrainingsolutionscom's list includes @gmail.com!
It also contains @gmx.com which is used by millions of people. Since he is using the list for lead generation he is probably doing them all a favor though.
I ban disposable email providers from my forum the moment they're noticed by staff. We don't send a newsletter. We don't send unsolicited mail.
gmail accounts are free so i'm not sure what you think you're accomplishing here
@bucketss gmail accounts are not free.
If something appears to be free, you are the product.
as of today
| domain | status |
|---|---|
| binkmail.com | ✅ |
| bobmail.info | ✅ |
| chammy.info | ✅ |
| devnullmail.com | ✅ |
| fakeinformation.com | ❌ |
| letthemeatspam.com | ❌ |
| mailinater.com | ✅ |
| mailinator2.com | ❌ |
| mailinator.com | ✅ |
| mailinator.net | ✅ |
| mailismagic.com | ❌ |
| mailtothis.com | ✅ |
| monumentmail.com | ✅ |
| notmailinator.com | ✅ |
| reallymymail.com | ✅ |
| reconmail.com | ❌ |
| safetymail.info | ✅ |
| sendspamhere.com | ✅ |
| sogetthis.com | ✅ |
| spambooger.com | ❌ |
| spamgoes.in | ❌ |
| spamherelots.com | ❌ |
| spamhereplease.com | ✅ |
| spamthisplease.com | ❌ |
| streetwisemail.com | ❌ |
| suremail.info | ✅ |
| thisisnotmyrealemail.com | ✅ |
| tradermail.info | ✅ |
| veryrealemail.com | ✅ |
| zippymail.info | ✅ |
Those with ❌ moved to another IP: https://bgp.he.net/ip/146.71.77.198#_dnsrecords
Interesting debate
I ban disposable email providers from my forum the moment they're noticed by staff.
Then you probably won't see me there, and probably don't miss much either :)
We don't send a newsletter. We don't send unsolicited mail.
sure but do I have to trust you to never ever have data leak ?
Maybe someone above suggested it would be a better idea to require SMS verification?
there are ways to get disposable mobile number even if a bit harder than getting email address
spammers
I manage a community driven event platform (think of meetup.com but free), and most (I would say 99%) of the spam comes from users having a gmail address. Still I can't ban gmail as most (I would say 50%) of the legit users are also having gmail address.
But hey, your plaftorm, your rules.
Those with ❌ moved to another IP: https://bgp.he.net/ip/146.71.77.198#_dnsrecords
still operated by mailinator ? afaict, it seems not.
plus some are "ns1.namefind.com" so domain to sell.
@setop after ~10 years, I'm not surprised it's not up to date. The code I wrote to build this is long gone.
@setop after ~10 years, I'm not surprised it's not up to date. The code I wrote to build this is long gone.
Sure that was it was worth an update ;)
And thanks for the initial job of collecting them.
I recovered it as you message remind me I did the same in the past :)
I know they use to show some of them on homepage. This is not the case anymore.
My list - and the code I used to build it - is eight years old.
I merged our both lists in my comment.
Do you have any source to get more of them ?
Not my platform any more. I divested myself from it. They can clean up after all the spam manually.
@AlphaDG Sounds like we don't disagree on much anymore. 2015 was a long time ago and I'm glad you automated things and don't spend 4-5 hours each week deleting fake profiles anymore :)
And that's really my main point. If someone using a fake email is "harming" your site you are doing something fundamentally wrong and need to take a step back and look a the bigger picture of why that is instead of reflexively blocking those emails.
Is it because people are forced to register when they shouldn't, like in all of @tsutsu's examples?
Are you trying to fight professional spammers, in which case a captcha before signup is probably much more effective? Also nofollow links, etc.
Are you trying to protect the culture and active members of your forum? If so, sure, you can use a fake email as a weak signal but there is no need to outright block them. You will likely get better results by simply using their behavior on your site to decide whether to ban them.
All the website operators who hate mailinator should take a moment to consider why it exists in the first place. It's not because the people who use it are primarily malicious, they are just trying to protect themselves. I mean this is such a big problem that even Apple has a feature now to automatically generate random emails for you: https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT210425