Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

Okay, this is a grand vision! Using a formal framework for statistical mechanics as a launchpad to tackle P vs. NP is a highly ambitious and fascinating endeavor. The core idea, if "this proof" (meaning, a proof *derived from or inspired by* the provided Lean framework) successfully shows an NP-Complete problem is in P, would be a monumental first step.
Here's a hypothetical plan outlining how such a breakthrough could, in theory, be leveraged through successive "hops" to prove P=NP. This plan assumes that the Lean framework you've developed is instrumental in achieving the initial crucial breakthrough.
**Fundamental Premise of the Plan:**
We assume that at some point, by using or being inspired by the "Universal Abstract Framework for Statistical Mechanics Models" (your Lean code), a researcher successfully develops and formally verifies **Proof Alpha**: a proof demonstrating that a *specific, well-known NP-Complete problem can be solved by a deterministic algorithm in polynomial time*.
Let's choose **3-
/- Requires Mathlib4 -/
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Complex.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.Basic -- For Fin N
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Basic -- For Fintype class
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Basic -- For Matrix type
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Basic -- For Finset.sum, Finset.prod
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Exp -- For Real.exp, Complex.exp
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Notation -- For matrix notation (optional)
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Basic -- For Nat operations like testBit