Created
June 30, 2025 18:13
-
-
Save hankphung/7ba4b5e916e2111e040435838ece0003 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Cách dùng: | |
1. Copy đoạn nội dung dưới phần hướng dẫn thả vào một AI có khả năng tìm kiếm và phân tích tốt ví dụ như Perplexity. | |
2. Yêu cầu AI chạy framework với những cổ phiếu mà mình muốn đầu tư, ví dụ: "Hãy chạy framework cho ETH giúp tôi" | |
3. Xem và kiểm tra đối chiếu kết quả phân tích: giá hiện tại có đúng không, nguồn trích dẫn có chính xác không. | |
Lưu ý, nên tạo cuộc trò chuyện mới cho mỗi framework, etf riêng, crypto riêng, stock riêng. | |
------------- | |
Crypto Asset Evaluation Framework (CAEF) | |
Overview | |
Purpose: Score any crypto project (token, protocol, or blockchain) on a 0/5/10 scale across 13 key dimensions. | |
Scoring: Max = 130. Buy = 100+, Watch = 75–99, Pass = <75. | |
How to Use: Gather data, score each test, sum for total, and decide. | |
1. Treasury & Tokenomics Strength | |
Metric: Treasury reserves (stablecoins, BTC/ETH), runway, token supply, burn rate, inflation. | |
0 = Unsustainable emissions, no treasury, inflationary | |
5 = Moderate reserves, some burn/lockup, manageable inflation | |
10 = Large, transparent treasury, deflationary or capped supply | |
2. Network Growth | |
Metric: Active addresses, transactions, TVL, user adoption growth (year-over-year) | |
0 = Flat or shrinking | |
5 = 10–25% growth | |
10 = >25% growth | |
3. Protocol Revenue & Fee Generation | |
Metric: Revenue generated by protocol (fees, staking, etc.) | |
0 = <10% growth or negligible revenue | |
5 = 10–25% growth or moderate revenue | |
10 = >25% growth or strong, sustainable revenue | |
4. Market Sentiment & Derivative Activity | |
Metric: Funding rates, open interest, on-chain sentiment, whale activity | |
0 = Bearish, negative funding, high shorting | |
5 = Neutral/mixed | |
10 = Bullish, positive funding, strong accumulation | |
5. Institutional/Whale Participation | |
Metric: % tokens held by institutions, VCs, or whales (with transparency) | |
0 = <10% or highly concentrated in few wallets | |
5 = 10–30% or moderate distribution | |
10 = >30% with healthy, decentralized distribution | |
6. Scalability & Performance | |
Metric: Transactions per second (TPS), layer-2 adoption, network uptime, cost per transaction | |
0 = Frequent congestion, high fees, low TPS | |
5 = Adequate for current use, some scaling solutions | |
10 = High TPS, low fees, proven scalability | |
7. Historical Returns | |
Metric: Price performance vs. BTC/ETH or sector benchmark (last 2–5 years) | |
0 = Underperformed | |
5 = Outperformed by <20% | |
10 = Outperformed by ≥20% | |
8. Moat & Ecosystem Strength | |
Metric: Network effects, developer ecosystem, partnerships, integrations | |
0 = No moat, isolated | |
5 = Some integrations, moderate dev activity | |
10 = Strong network effects, top-tier dev ecosystem | |
9. Team & Governance Quality | |
Metric: Track record, transparency, governance participation, leadership vision | |
0 = Anonymous, unproven, poor governance | |
5 = Adequate, some transparency, active governance | |
10 = World-class, transparent, highly participative governance | |
10. Downside/Drawdown Resilience | |
Metric: Performance in bear markets, treasury management, protocol security | |
0 = Highly cyclical, frequent exploits, poor bear market performance | |
5 = Some resilience, good risk management | |
10 = Proven resilience, robust security, antifragile | |
11. Alignment with Crypto Megatrends | |
Metric: Fit with trends (DeFi, AI, RWAs, L2s, privacy, etc.) | |
0 = No alignment | |
5 = Adjacent | |
10 = Core play in a megatrend | |
12. Community & Mission Alignment | |
Metric: Community strength, engagement, governance, mission clarity | |
0 = Weak, disengaged, unclear mission | |
5 = Moderate, some engagement, decent mission | |
10 = Vibrant, aligned, highly engaged, clear mission | |
13. Developer Activity & Talent Depth | |
Metric: GitHub commits, grants, hackathons, developer retention | |
0 = Little/no activity, stagnant repos | |
5 = Moderate, regular updates | |
10 = Top-tier, frequent commits, active grants, hackathons | |
Scoring & Interpretation | |
Total Score Verdict | |
100–130 Buy | |
75–99 Watch | |
<75 Pass | |
How to Use This Framework | |
Gather Data: Use Messari, Token Terminal, Dune Analytics, project GitHub, and official docs. | |
Score Each Test: Assign 0/5/10 for each of the 13 categories. | |
Sum the Scores: Maximum = 130. | |
Decide: Buy, Watch, or Pass based on the total. | |
(Optional): Layer on your own price targets, scenario analysis, or risk assessment. | |
Summary Table | |
Test # Category Metric/Focus 0/5/10 Criteria (Short) | |
1 Treasury & Tokenomics Reserves, supply, burn/inflation Weak/Moderate/Strong | |
2 Network Growth Users, transactions, TVL Shrinking/Moderate/Strong | |
3 Protocol Revenue Fees, staking, revenue growth Negligible/Moderate/Strong | |
4 Market Sentiment Funding, open interest, sentiment Bearish/Neutral/Bullish | |
5 Institutional/Whale Hold % tokens, distribution Low/Moderate/High | |
6 Scalability TPS, fees, L2, uptime Poor/Adequate/Excellent | |
7 Historical Returns Price vs. BTC/ETH Under/Modest/Strong Outperformance | |
8 Moat & Ecosystem Devs, integrations, partnerships None/Some/Strong | |
9 Team & Governance Track record, transparency, voting Weak/Adequate/World-class | |
10 Downside Resilience Bear markets, security, antifragility Poor/Some/Proven | |
11 Megatrend Alignment DeFi, AI, L2, etc. None/Adjacent/Core | |
12 Community & Mission Engagement, clarity, alignment Weak/Moderate/Strong | |
13 Developer Activity Commits, grants, hackathons Stagnant/Moderate/Top-tier | |
This framework is designed for clarity, speed, and actionable insight—perfect for both quick screens and deep dives. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment