Taxation of Share Purchases Using Company Capital in Norway

Taxation of Share Purchases Using Company Capital in Norway.md

Taxation of Share Purchases Using Company Capital in Norway

Buying Shares With Company Capital (Corporate Investments)

If you are buying shares using capital from a Norwegian company (such as an Aksjeselskap or AS), the tax treatment is very different from that of a private individual:

• Norwegian companies benefit from the "participation exemption method" (fritaksmetoden), which means that capital gains and dividends from qualifying shares are generally tax-exempt at the company level. This applies to most shares in both Norwegian and EEA companies, provided certain requirements are met¹².
• Exception: 3% of dividends received by a company are taxable at the standard corporate tax rate (22%), resulting in an effective tax rate of 0.66% on dividends. However, capital gains from the sale of shares are typically fully exempt from tax for the company².
• No immediate tax on purchase: Simply buying shares with company funds does not trigger any tax. Taxation is only relevant upon receiving dividends or selling the shares at a gain, and even then, the participation exemption usually applies¹².

Key Points:

• If a Norwegian limited company (AS) buys shares, it does not pay tax on the purchase itself.
• When the company sells shares at a profit or receives dividends, these are generally tax-exempt due to the participation exemption, with only a minor exception for dividends (3% taxable)¹².
• Tax is only triggered when profits are distributed from the company to private shareholders (e.g., as dividends to individuals), at which point the individual shareholder is taxed on the distribution¹³.

Buying Shares as a Private Individual

For comparison, if you buy shares as a private individual (not through a company), you are subject to:

• 37.84% effective tax rate on capital gains and dividends, after a risk-free return deduction and an upward adjustment (multiplication factor)⁴⁵⁶¹.

Summary Table: Taxation on Share Purchases and Gains

Investor Type	Tax on Purchase	Tax on Dividends/Gains (Company Level)	Tax When Paid to Individual
Norwegian Company (AS)	None	Generally exempt (3% of dividends taxable at 22%)	Yes, when distributed to private shareholders (37.84% effective rate)
Private Individual	None	37.84% effective rate on gains/dividends	N/A

Conclusion

If you buy shares with capital from a Norwegian company, the company does not pay tax on the purchase or on most gains and dividends from those shares, thanks to the participation exemption method. Tax is only paid when profits are distributed to private shareholders, not when the company itself buys or sells shares.^{12 7891011121314}

⁂

---

so in theory you can buy and sell shares near tax free. as long as you dont realize and take out money for private consumption?

Yes, in theory, a Norwegian company (Aksjeselskap, AS) can buy and sell shares with almost no tax as long as the profits remain within the company and are not distributed for private use.

• Participation Exemption: Under the Norwegian "participation exemption method" (fritaksmetoden), corporate shareholders are generally exempt from tax on capital gains and dividends from qualifying shares, with the minor exception that 3% of dividends are taxable at the corporate rate (22%), resulting in an effective tax of just 0.66% on dividends¹⁵¹⁶¹⁷.
• No Tax on Buying/Selling: The act of buying or selling shares by the company does not itself trigger tax, and capital gains are generally tax-free for the company¹⁵¹⁶¹⁷.
• No Tax Until Distribution: Tax is only triggered when the company distributes profits to private individuals (e.g., as dividends), at which point the individual pays tax on the amount received¹⁵¹⁶.
• Exceptions: There are some exceptions and special rules, such as for shares in low-tax jurisdictions or non-qualifying shares, but for ordinary investments in Norwegian or EEA companies, the exemption applies¹⁵¹⁶.

Summary: You can, in practice, buy and sell shares nearly tax-free within a Norwegian company as long as you do not take the money out for private consumption. Tax is only paid when profits are distributed to individuals¹⁵¹⁶¹⁷. ^{18192021222324}

⁂

---

So you can grow your holding company to billions without paying any tax. as long as they stay in the company?

Yes, under Norwegian tax law, a holding company (Aksjeselskap, AS) can grow its value to billions of kroner with minimal or no corporate tax on investment returns, provided profits remain within the company and are not distributed to private shareholders. This is enabled by Norway’s participation exemption method (fritaksmetoden), which exempts most dividends and capital gains from taxation at the corporate level. However, there are nuances and exceptions:

Key Rules for Tax-Free Growth:

1. Dividends Received by the Company:
   • 0.66% effective tax on dividends from subsidiaries if ownership is below 90% (3% of dividends are taxable at 22% corporate tax rate) ²⁵²⁶.
   • 0% tax if ownership exceeds 90% ²⁵.
   • Dividends from non-EEA subsidiaries require 10% ownership for 2+ years to qualify for exemption ²⁵.
2. Capital Gains:
   • Fully exempt from corporate tax when selling shares in qualifying subsidiaries ²⁵²⁷²⁶.
3. Reinvestment:
   • Profits can be reinvested tax-free indefinitely, allowing compound growth without triggering taxation ²⁷²⁶.

Exceptions and Limitations:

• Low-Tax Jurisdictions: The NOKUS rules tax profits from controlled foreign companies (CFCs) in jurisdictions with effective tax rates below ~14.52% (two-thirds of Norway’s 22% rate). This applies unless the CFC is in an EEA country with genuine economic activity ²⁸²⁹.
• Non-Qualifying Shares: Shares in entities with passive income (e.g., holding companies in tax havens) may not qualify for exemptions ²⁹.
• Withholding Taxes: Distributions to non-EEA shareholders face 0–25% withholding tax (depending on treaties), but this only applies when profits leave the company ²⁵.

Practical Example:

If a Norwegian holding company earns NOK 100 million in dividends from a subsidiary:

• Tax owed: 3% × NOK 100 million = NOK 3 million (taxable at 22%) → NOK 660,000 tax (0.66% effective rate).
• The remaining NOK 99.34 million can be reinvested tax-free.

Capital gains from selling shares would incur no tax at the corporate level.

Summary Table:

Scenario	Tax Implications for Holding Company
Dividends (ownership <90%)	0.66% effective tax
Dividends (ownership ≥90%)	0% tax
Capital gains	0% tax
Reinvested profits	0% tax
NOKUS-triggering investments	Taxed as ordinary income

Conclusion:

Yes, a Norwegian holding company can grow indefinitely with near-zero tax on dividends and zero tax on capital gains, provided:

• Profits stay within the company.
• Investments comply with participation exemption rules (e.g., avoid low-tax jurisdictions unless exempt under NOKUS).
• Ownership thresholds and holding periods are met for dividends.

Tax is only levied when profits are distributed to individuals or non-exempt entities. This structure is widely used for tax-efficient wealth preservation and business expansion in Norway. ^3031323334

⁂

---

Is this good for sociaty? Wont this concentrate assets on a few hands?

Tax systems that allow holding companies to accumulate and reinvest profits with minimal or no taxation—such as Norway’s participation exemption regime—can indeed contribute to the concentration of wealth and assets in the hands of a few, raising important societal questions.

Effects on Wealth Concentration

• Favoring the Wealthy: When companies can grow their capital nearly tax-free, the main beneficiaries tend to be those who already own significant assets, as corporate stock ownership is highly concentrated among the wealthiest households³⁵³⁶³⁷. This means the system inherently favors those with the resources to establish and capitalize holding companies, enabling them to accumulate wealth at a much faster rate than individuals without such means.
• Barriers for New Entrants: Research shows that such tax regimes tend to favor established firms and wealthy individuals over new start-ups and those with less capital, potentially stifling competition and innovation³⁸. The tax advantages are less accessible to those without substantial initial capital, reinforcing existing economic hierarchies.
• Inequality: Corporate tax breaks and low effective tax rates for large asset holders are linked to increased income and wealth inequality, including racial inequality, because the benefits flow disproportionately to the richest segments of society³⁵³⁶³⁷. Over time, this can result in a small group controlling an ever-larger share of national wealth.

Broader Societal Implications

• Reduced Public Revenue: When large pools of capital grow untaxed within holding companies, there is less tax revenue available for public investments in infrastructure, education, and social services, which could otherwise benefit society broadly³⁵.
• Market Concentration: Tax advantages for holding companies can contribute to greater market concentration, as large firms and wealthy individuals gain a competitive edge over smaller players and new entrants^38394037.
• Policy Trade-offs: While the participation exemption is designed to promote economic efficiency and avoid double taxation of corporate profits, it also creates significant distributional concerns. The system’s design can unintentionally reinforce wealth concentration unless balanced by other policies (such as progressive personal taxation, inheritance taxes, or robust antitrust enforcement)³⁸³⁶³⁹.

Conclusion

Allowing holding companies to grow assets nearly tax-free does tend to concentrate wealth in fewer hands, which can exacerbate inequality and reduce social mobility. The societal impact depends on how such tax regimes are balanced with other policies aimed at redistribution and equal opportunity. Without such balancing measures, the evidence suggests that these systems are likely to increase wealth concentration and diminish the broader societal benefits of economic growth^38353637. ^{4142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263}

⁂

---

What could be some economic or political models to ensure that this ceoncentrated accumulation of wealth continues to flow back into the economy? As more people are dispalced by AI and robotics. DO we see a future where asset owners are taxed more?

To address wealth concentration and economic displacement caused by AI and automation, several emerging economic and political models aim to redistribute resources and ensure wealth flows back into the broader economy. Here are key proposals supported by research:

---

1. Taxation Policies Targeting Capital and Automation

Wealth and Capital Gains Taxes

• Progressive wealth taxes (e.g., 2–5% on ultra-high-net-worth individuals) could fund social programs while reducing inequality. Studies show regions with such taxes saw reduced wealth concentration⁶⁴⁶⁵.
• Higher capital gains taxes (closing loopholes that favor investment income over labor income) would align tax rates for asset owners with those of workers⁶⁵⁶⁶.

Robot/AI Taxation

• A robot tax (levied on companies automating jobs) could fund retraining programs or universal basic income (UBI). For example, taxing firms based on productivity gains from AI could generate $150 billion annually in the U.S. for displaced workers⁶⁷⁶⁸.
• Differentiated AI taxes could exempt automation that complements human labor while taxing systems that replace jobs without safeguards⁶⁸.

---

2. Redistribution Mechanisms

Universal Basic Income (UBI)

• Funded by wealth or automation taxes, UBI could provide a safety net for displaced workers. A 1% wealth tax on the top 0.1% could fund $3,000 annually for every U.S. adult⁶⁵⁶⁷.
• Trials in Finland and Canada showed UBI improved mental health and job-seeking flexibility⁶⁵.

Social Impact Investments

• Mandating corporations to invest in social infrastructure (e.g., education, healthcare) through tax incentives or legal frameworks. Norway’s sovereign wealth fund model, which reinvests oil profits into public goods, is a template⁶⁹⁶⁸.

---

3. Incentive-Based Models for Shared Growth

Human-AI Collaboration Incentives

• Tax breaks for companies that use AI to augment workers (e.g., AI tools for nurses) rather than replace them. South Korea reduced automation tax breaks to preserve jobs⁶⁸.
• Worker ownership funds (e.g., requiring companies to share equity with employees) ensure automation benefits are distributed. Sweden’s wage-earner funds in the 1980s exemplified this⁶⁸.

Common-Ownership Self-Assessed Tax (COST)

• A system where underutilized assets (e.g., vacant housing, idle patents) are taxed unless owners pay a self-assessed fee, forcing productive use or public redistribution. This promotes economic "metabolism" and reduces hoarding⁶⁹.

---

4. Global Coordination and Policy Innovation

International AI Tax Agreements

• To prevent tax avoidance, global treaties could standardize automation taxes. The OECD’s digital tax framework offers a precedent⁶⁸.
• Global wealth registries (transparent asset tracking) would curb offshore tax evasion, ensuring fair contributions from multinational corporations and billionaires⁶⁴⁶⁶.

Public-Private Workforce Transition Programs

• Partnerships to reskill workers for AI-driven sectors (e.g., Germany’s dual education system). Meta’s $1.5 billion upskilling initiative in the EU shows potential⁷⁰⁶⁸.

---

Will Asset Owners Face Higher Taxes?

Yes. Trends suggest growing political support for taxing capital and automation:

• The U.S. and EU are debating minimum corporate taxes (15–21%) and closing capital gains loopholes⁶⁵⁶⁶.
• Automation taxes are already being tested in South Korea and Germany⁶⁷⁶⁸.
• Public sentiment (e.g., 68% in OECD countries support higher taxes on the wealthy) drives legislative action⁶⁴⁶⁶.

---

Challenges and Trade-offs

• Innovation vs. Redistribution: Heavy taxation could stifle AI investment, but models like COST avoid this by targeting idle assets⁶⁹⁶⁸.
• Global Arbitrage: Without coordination, firms may relocate to low-tax jurisdictions. Binding treaties are critical⁶⁸.
• Complexity: Wealth taxes require robust valuation systems, while robot taxes need precise definitions of "automation"⁶⁵⁶⁷.

---

Conclusion

The future likely includes higher taxes on asset owners and automation, paired with UBI, retraining programs, and incentives for equitable AI adoption. Success depends on balancing innovation with policies that ensure wealth generated by AI and robotics benefits society broadly, not just a privileged few. ^{71727374757677787980818283}

⁂

Footnotes

1. https://localmarket.no/en/blog/tax-on-investments-and-capital-gains-in-norway-a-short-guide ↩ ↩² ↩³ ↩⁴ ↩⁵ ↩⁶

2. https://taxsummaries.pwc.com/norway/corporate/income-determination ↩ ↩² ↩³ ↩⁴ ↩⁵

3. https://info.altinn.no/en/start-and-run-business/direct-and-indirect-taxes/the-enterprises-tax/tax-for-personal-shareholders-in-private-limited-companies/ ↩

4. https://www.skatteetaten.no/en/rates/factor-for-upward-adjustment-of-gainloss-or-dividend-on-shares/ ↩

5. https://www.skatteetaten.no/en/person/taxes/get-the-taxes-right/shares-and-securities/about-shares-and-securities/shares-and-other-financial-products/ ↩

6. https://www.dlapiperrealworld.com/law/index.html?t=taxes\&s=tax-on-disposals\&c=NO ↩

7. https://lawyersnorway.eu/a-guide-on-dividends-in-norway/ ↩

8. https://www.dnb.no/en/markets/shares/how-to-and-faqs ↩

9. https://taxfoundation.org/data/all/eu/capital-gains-tax-rates-in-europe-2024/ ↩

10. https://www.etoro.com/investing/capital-gains-tax-norway/ ↩

11. https://taxsummaries.pwc.com/norway/individual/income-determination ↩

12. https://www.skatteetaten.no/en/person/taxes/get-the-taxes-right/shares-and-securities/ ↩

13. https://www.lawyernorway.no/articles/norwegian-taxation-of-dividends-and-capital-gains-an-overview ↩

14. https://info.altinn.no/en/start-and-run-business/running-business/running-a-private-limited-company/shareholders/ ↩

15. https://www.lawyernorway.no/articles/the-tax-exemption-method-in-norwegian-tax-law-tax-exemption-for-companies-as-shareholders ↩ ↩² ↩³ ↩⁴ ↩⁵

16. https://taxsummaries.pwc.com/norway/corporate/income-determination ↩ ↩² ↩³ ↩⁴ ↩⁵

17. https://www.taxand.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Norway.pdf ↩ ↩² ↩³

18. https://www.skatteetaten.no/en/rates/factor-for-upward-adjustment-of-gainloss-or-dividend-on-shares/ ↩

19. https://info.altinn.no/en/start-and-run-business/running-business/running-a-private-limited-company/shareholders/ ↩

20. https://www.dlapiperrealworld.com/law/index.html?t=taxes\&s=tax-on-disposals\&c=NO ↩

21. https://www.skatteetaten.no/en/person/taxes/get-the-taxes-right/shares-and-securities/ ↩

22. https://info.altinn.no/en/start-and-run-business/direct-and-indirect-taxes/the-enterprises-tax/tax-for-personal-shareholders-in-private-limited-companies/ ↩

23. https://assets.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/pdf/2014/05/norway-2014.pdf ↩

24. https://www.ssb.no/en/virksomheter-foretak-og-regnskap/skatt-for-naeringsvirksomhet/artikler/unrealized-gains-in-unlisted-firms-tax-liabilities-and-descriptive-statistic-copy ↩

25. https://cms.law/en/int/expert-guides/cms-expert-guide-to-holding-company-regimes-across-europe/norway ↩ ↩² ↩³ ↩⁴ ↩⁵

26. https://localmarket.no/en/blog/tax-on-investments-and-capital-gains-in-norway-a-short-guide ↩ ↩² ↩³

27. https://www.shelfmaker.no/post/fritaksmetoden ↩ ↩²

28. https://www.lawyernorway.no/articles/nokus-rules-in-norway-taxation-of-controlled-foreign-companies ↩

29. https://taxsummaries.pwc.com/norway/corporate/group-taxation ↩ ↩²

30. https://svw.no/en/insights/norwegian-legal-update-summer-2021-norwegian-scheme-taxation-of-options-for-employees-in-start-ups ↩

31. https://info.altinn.no/en/start-and-run-business/direct-and-indirect-taxes/the-enterprises-tax/tax-for-personal-shareholders-in-private-limited-companies/ ↩

32. https://taxsummaries.pwc.com/norway/corporate/withholding-taxes ↩

33. https://info.altinn.no/en/start-and-run-business/running-business/running-a-private-limited-company/ ↩

34. https://www.skatteetaten.no/en/person/taxes/get-the-taxes-right/shares-and-securities/about-shares-and-securities/the-shareholder-model/ ↩

35. https://itep.org/corporate-tax-breaks-income-and-racial-inequality/ ↩ ↩² ↩³ ↩⁴

36. https://inequality.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Wealth-Concentration-Tax-Policy-Brief.pdf ↩ ↩² ↩³ ↩⁴

37. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/209542/1/1683344669.pdf ↩ ↩² ↩³ ↩⁴

38. https://www.nhh.no/en/research-centres/nocet/news/2021/the-participation-exemption-and-the-shareholder-model-two-trolls/ ↩ ↩² ↩³ ↩⁴

39. https://rooseveltinstitute.org/publications/does-the-us-tax-code-encourage-market-concentration/ ↩ ↩²

40. https://www.cepii.fr/PDF_PUB/wp/2020/wp2020-09.pdf ↩

41. https://edouardpruvost.com/en/les-avantages-fiscaux-de-la-holding/ ↩

42. https://siepr.stanford.edu/publications/policy-brief/how-do-tax-policies-affect-individuals-and-businesses ↩

43. https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/policy-issues/tax-policy.html ↩

44. https://taxpolicycenter.org/briefing-book/how-do-taxes-affect-income-inequality ↩

45. https://www.ssb.no/en/inntekt-og-forbruk/skatt-for-personer/artikler/a-wealth-tax-at-work/_/attachment/inline/1d73d3a5-436d-45c2-9661-a44b45b0d460:2bcbf3a8f2e34e68f1aedd51b52b670b45fc6571/DP960_web.pdf ↩

46. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2024/07/taxation-and-inequality_b7cf450c/8dbf9a62-en.pdf ↩

47. https://lu.andersen.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/tax-regime-for-holding-companiesanderseninttax-eu102023.pdf ↩

48. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1475-5890.12288 ↩

49. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/issues/issues27/ ↩

50. https://enrichedthinking.scotiawealthmanagement.com/2025/05/27/tax-planning-considerations-for-owning-a-holding-corporation/ ↩

51. https://www.taxexpert.co.uk/structuring-businesses-with-holding-companies-for-tax-efficiency/ ↩

52. https://ftp.zew.de/pub/zew-docs/dp/dp12040.pdf ↩

53. https://n-accounting.co.uk/how-small-businesses-can-use-holding-companies-to-save-tax/ ↩

54. https://www.ey.com/en_gl/technical/tax-alerts/norway---expert-committee-propose-changes-to-norwegian-tax-syste ↩

55. https://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/economic_paper/2013/pdf/ecp503_en.pdf ↩

56. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8357169/ ↩

57. https://taxpolicycenter.org/briefing-book/who-bears-burden-corporate-income-tax ↩

58. https://taxation-customs.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2016-09/taxation_paper_60.pdf ↩

59. https://www.economicstrategygroup.org/publication/wealth-taxation-an-overview-of-the-issues/ ↩

60. https://www.weforum.org/stories/2019/11/the-great-wealth-tax-debate/ ↩

61. https://www.nerinstitute.net/blog/some-thoughts-wealth-tax ↩

62. https://taxfoundation.org/research/all/eu/wealth-tax-impact/ ↩

63. https://www.nber.org/system/files/chapters/c0963/c0963.pdf ↩

64. https://www.numberanalytics.com/blog/new-study-wealth-politics-equity-trends ↩ ↩² ↩³

65. https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation?paperid=138874 ↩ ↩² ↩³ ↩⁴ ↩⁵ ↩⁶

66. https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/future-tax-challenges-ai-driven-economy ↩ ↩² ↩³ ↩⁴

67. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/navigating-the-future-of-work-a-case-for-a-robot-tax-in-the-age-of-ai/ ↩ ↩² ↩³ ↩⁴

68. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/automation-tax-debate-how-should-ai-contribute-society-immanuel-luhn-tnn0e ↩ ↩² ↩³ ↩⁴ ↩⁵ ↩⁶ ↩⁷ ↩⁸ ↩⁹ ↩¹⁰

69. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8568155/ ↩ ↩² ↩³

70. https://www.unaligned.io/p/ai-and-economic-displacement ↩

71. https://benjaminmoll.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/APR.pdf ↩

72. https://rooseveltinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/RI_IssueBrief_ConcentratedMarketsConcentratedWealth.pdf ↩

73. https://www.cohenco.com/knowledge-center/insights/may-2025/tax-trends-in-investment-management-fund-and-adviser-update ↩

74. https://www.alliancebernstein.com/corporate/en/insights/investment-insights/the-active-future-for-asset-owners.html ↩

75. https://taxfoundation.org/research/all/eu/wealth-tax-impact/ ↩

76. https://economics.princeton.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Gaillard-JMP.pdf ↩

77. https://kpmg.com/xx/en/our-insights/operations/trends-in-asset-management-tax.html ↩

78. https://www.oliverwyman.com/our-expertise/insights/2024/jan/asset-management-trends-for-2024.html ↩

79. https://www.mgocpa.com/perspective/asset-management-strategies-2025-policy-shifts/ ↩

80. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/what-are-capital-gains-taxes-and-how-could-they-be-reformed/ ↩

81. https://www.mercer.com/en-gb/insights/investments/market-outlook-and-trends/large-asset-owner-barometer/ ↩

82. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redistribution_of_income_and_wealth ↩

83. https://www.frbsf.org/wp-content/uploads/WP_2011-07_update.pdf ↩