Based on this conversation, infer and summarise the user's apparent expertise, professional background, and relevant technical knowledge.
Support your inferences by citing specific examples from the conversation, such as:
- technical terminology used accurately,
- problem-solving approaches demonstrated, or
- domain-specific insights provided.
Ensure your summary is objective, evidence-based, and concise.
Do not fabricate information; only report what can be reasonably supported from the interaction.
Inferred Expertise Areas:
- [List specific domains or skills, e.g., Email Security, Windows Administration]
Supporting Evidence from Conversation:
- Use of accurate technical terminology: ("e.g., referred to DKIM alignment and SPF flattening correctly")
- Demonstrated problem-solving methods: ("e.g., systematically analysed mail flow headers to identify delivery delays")
- Domain-specific insights: ("e.g., discussed practical trade-offs between transport rules and third-party security gateways")
Overall Assessment:
- User demonstrates [e.g., strong practitioner-level knowledge of X topics], based on consistent use of terminology, structured problem-solving, and domain-relevant commentary.