Infrastructure-as-Code is a principal that drives modern DevOps practice. I discuss the current state of Terraform and provide some basic guidelines/principles regarding how to structure it's usage for your project.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
/* bling.js */ | |
window.$ = document.querySelector.bind(document); | |
window.$$ = document.querySelectorAll.bind(document); | |
Node.prototype.on = window.on = function(name, fn) { this.addEventListener(name, fn); }; | |
NodeList.prototype.__proto__ = Array.prototype; | |
NodeList.prototype.on = function(name, fn) { this.forEach((elem) => elem.on(name, fn)); }; |
This document is a collection of concepts and strategies to make large Elm projects modular and extensible.
We will start by thinking about the structure of signals in our program. Broadly speaking, your application state should live in one big foldp
. You will probably merge
a bunch of input signals into a single stream of updates. This sounds a bit crazy at first, but it is in the same ballpark as Om or Facebook's Flux. There are a couple major benefits to having a centralized home for your application state:
- There is a single source of truth. Traditional approaches force you to write a decent amount of custom and error prone code to synchronize state between many different stateful components. (The state of this widget needs to be synced with the application state, which needs to be synced with some other widget, etc.) By placing all of your state in one location, you eliminate an entire class of bugs in which two components get into inconsistent states. We also think yo